Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa19605; 8 Aug 93 2:03 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA03058 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Sat, 7 Aug 1993 23:43:36 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA08355 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Sat, 7 Aug 1993 23:43:03 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1993 23:43:03 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308080443.AA08355@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #551 TELECOM Digest Sat, 7 Aug 93 23:43:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 551 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Is This Legal? (Gang Zhou) Re: Is This Legal? (Richard Osterberg) Re: Anonymous UUCP (was Re: 900 Numbers; FTC Rules) (Pierre Asselin) Re: Translation Help Needed with Telephony Terms in Spanish (Robt Morelos) Re: What is Category 5 (re: ISDN) (Fred R. Goldstein) Re: Push 1 to ... (Chris Ambler) Re: Dialing "1" First (Bob Goudreau) Re: Choosing LD Service (Jeff Miller) Re: Newton MessagePad Now Available From Apple (Monty Solomon) Re: Victory For 900 Users: FTC Rules Announced (Dave Levenson) Re: Looking For Information and Experience With LCI (Macy Hallock) Re: Movie: In the Line of Fire (Paul Houle) Re: Do We Have a Theme Song? (Scott Bridgewater) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: gzhou@pollux.usc.edu (Gang Zhou) Subject: Re: Is This Legal? Date: 7 Aug 1993 17:38:41 -0700 Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA In article mlevin@nyx.cs.du.edu, writes: > illegal? Must the school provide equal access even though these are ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > not real phone numbers or lines which can be dialed directly from > outside? If this is in fact illegal, how can I make the school let me > choose the carrier on a per-call basis (a la 10xxx)? Apparently the > equipment just doesn't allow 1+ or 0+ calls. My school, USC, explained that there are certain kind of buildings like hotel, prison, school residential buildings which are different as normal residential buildings, so they don't need to provide equal access to LD carriers. The lack of freedom of choosing LD carrier is the very reason for our very high LD rates. Is it true that the school dorms are in the same category of hotel, prison in regards of equal access? I was told that students of Stanford filed a law suit against the school. They lost in California, and now the law suit reached the Supreme Court. Gang ------------------------------ From: osterber@%husc8.harvard.edu Subject: Re: Is This Legal? From: osterber@husc8.harvard.edu (Richard Osterberg) Date: 8 Aug 93 03:08:06 GMT > If I were to recommend anything to the telecom department, it would be > to rebid their LD contract and get a better deal. As far as them > being responsible for unpaid LD calls, I would make arrangements to > hold the grades of any offender -- I can't imagine a University or > telecom department being responsible for any students unpaid bills!!! I was told last year by our campus telephone office (talked to the director himself) that the new ruling wouldn't force them to offer us anything different. Right now, Harvard gets an excellent rate from MCI ... they receive a 50% discount on all long distance calls. However, Harvard only passes a 5% discount onto students. In other words, 45% of what I'm paying in LD charges is going to Harvard. They claim that they need it to pay for things like directory assistance operators and switchboard operators. And -- I'm curious as to technical sides of the system. Our system is each phone line has an outside number (direct dial in). We dial 9+xxx-xxxx to get out, but can dial the last five digits within campus. (All numbers ar 617-49x-xxxx). What exactly would be the term for this type of system? Would it generally be capable of providing 10xxx access? Rick Osterberg osterber@husc.harvard.edu 617-527-6664 617-965-0370 [Moderator's Note: The name for your system is centrex. Yes, it can provide 10xxx dialing. PAT] ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Anonymous UUCP (was Re: 900 Numbers; FTC Rules) Date: 7 Aug 93 12:53:29 PDT (Sat) From: pa@verano.sba.ca.us (Pierre Asselin) > [Moderator's Note: But as pointed out by some, UUCP operates without > human intervention. So who is there to see the warning message? PAT] In practice, no one. In theory, the calling site could turn on debugging and the root user would later find the login banner in the logs, if he cares to looks. Of course it's too late by then. It's hard to imagine anyone "innocently" setting up the config files and dialing the 900 number by uucp. More likely, the warning is meant for unsuspecting browsers who try to dial in interactively. Pierre Asselin, Santa Barbara, California pa@verano.sba.ca.us ------------------------------ From: robert@ee4.eng.hawaii.edu (Robert Morelos) Subject: Re: Translation Help Needed with Telephony Terms in Spanish Organization: University of Hawaii, Dept. of Electrical Engineering Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1993 08:45:05 GMT In article myerston@qm.sri.com writes: >> I am badly in need of official (CCITT ?) Spanish language translations >> for the following terms: >> Echo Return Level >> Singing Return Loss >> and the ever present: TIP & RING. I know this varies from country >> to country. I have run into PUNTA, ANILLO, NUCA and "A & B". Any >> ideas? > I can propose the following translations: > Echo Return Level: nivel de retorno de eco > Singing Return Loss: perdida de retorno para el cebado > Concerning Tip & Ring, the official Spanish terms are tron y ron. ^^^^^^^ But, surely you mean Spain's Spanish and not Latin American Spanish. I have lived in Mexico must of my life and always had trouble understanding books written in Spain. May I propose the following: Singing Return Loss: perdida de retorno de oscilamiento Regards, Robert H. Morelos-Zaragoza, Research Associate Dept. of Information and Computer Sciences e-mail: Faculty of Engineering Science robert@ics.es.osaka-u.ac.jp Osaka University Toyonaka, Osaka 560 Japan +81 (6) 850-3060 ------------------------------ From: goldstein@carafe.tay2.dec.com (Fred R. Goldstein) Subject: Re: What is Category 5 (re: ISDN) Organization: Digital Equipment Corp., Littleton MA USA Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1993 03:49:00 GMT In article hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) writes: > Can anyone give a BRIEF description of the electrical coding > scheme on all these high speed twisted pair systems (such as ISDN)? I > haven't taken the time to research it at all. How many bits per baud > are being run? Is it a multi-level coding system or just two or three > level (such as positive/negative or positive/zero/negative). I've > always thought that on an analog medium, such as a pair of wires, we > should run as many levels as we can until noise starts making level > determination at the far end difficult, making the error correction > overhead exceed the data throughput benefit of running more levels. > Do such systems treat the twisted pair as a transmission line, > matching the characteristic impedance to prevent reflections? Do they > work full duplex using some sort of hybrid, or just go real fast half > duplex? Can we use these techniques over leased lines ordered from > the local phone company (like 3002 lines)? One of the little sound bites I like to throw into my Transmission class is that "at the bottom, all transmission systems are analog"! So it's not a simple answer to a very good question. I'll give a summary of ISDN. The BRI S/T interface (inside wire) uses Modified Duo-Binary (MDB) coding, which is a three-level code. A 1 is no voltage and a 0 is a positive or negative voltage pulse, each pulse the opposite of the last (with some exceptions). The coding used for the Primary Rate, that is to say T1 and E1, is Alternate Mark Inversion. That's sort of like MDB except that 0's are no voltage and 1's an alternating pulse, but note that the pulse shapes are specified quite differently for the BRI (Basic Rate 2B+D) and the PRI (T1/E1), among other details. At the U interface of the BRI (outside wire, local loop), the coding is now usually "2B1Q". This takes two bits from the scrambled data stream and encodes them as +2.5, +.7, -.7, or -2.5 (about) volts. So one pulse is two bits (thus 2 Bits one Quat). Don't quote me on the exact voltages; I don't have the spec handy. Again there's pulse shaping. To make all this work, impedance is specified, with very picky transformers needed for S/T to meet spec. S/T uses separate transmit and receive wires, thus a 4-wire interface. The BRI U uses one pair, so there's some fancy echo cancellation done inside the transceiver ("UBAT", in AT&T terms) chip. Real fancy. 3002 lines are utterly obsolete. Voice-grade is now used for dial-up, and the "state of the art" is being presented in the developing V.fast world. In lieu of 3002 most phone companies (in America at least) will sell you 56k service. THis could be provisioned using ISDN technology, but in practice there are cheaper purpose-built line drivers. Fred R. Goldstein k1io goldstein@carafe.tay2.dec.com Opinions are mine alone; sharing requires permission ------------------------------ From: cambler@cymbal.calpoly.edu (Chris Ambler -- Phish) Subject: Re: Push 1 to ... Organization: The Phishtank Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1993 04:05:59 GMT rupa@sugar.NeoSoft.Com (Rupa Schomaker) says: > I'm looking for a `voice mail' type system which would interface with > some sort of database. > Is there a such a system which is commercially available that can do > this? Ease of programming would be nice. While the system I've written won't do this out of the box, I do offer custom changes at very reasonable cost (to toot my own horn, since you asked :-)). The product, FSVMP, is essentially a voice BBS. It has normal voice mailboxes, announcement facilities, and up to 560 public topics which act like BBS areas (listen in chronological order, post, reply, or reply to voice mail). It runs on a Talking Technology PowerLine II card, which provides 2 lines. A multicard version (8 cards, 16 lines max) is in the works. This all runs on a PC under MS/PCDOS. The 2 line version will run on a 386SX with 640K even. Adding a feature like you ask would be very simple, as I've reserved a number of top-level choices for expansion and customization. If you want more information, I can be reached at (805) 542-0336, or send email and I can fax the information and spec sheet to you. Sorry if this sounds like a commercial. I've deliberately left out pricing and all that jazz to make it a bit more Usenet friendly :-) cambler@zeus.calpoly.edu | Christopher J. Ambler chris@toys.fubarsys.com | Author, FSUUCP 1.32 ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1993 17:58:42 -0400 From: goudreau@dg-rtp.dg.com (Bob Goudreau) Subject: Re: Dialing "1" First daveb%avatar@dsinet.dgtl.com (David Breneman) writes: > johnl@iecc.com (John R. Levine) writes: >> To tell a number like 802-5556 from 802-555-6789, there are >> two dialing plans in use in North America. In one plan, all calls >> within your area code are dialed with seven digits, whether they are >> local or toll. In the other, all toll calls are dialed with eleven >> digits, even within your area code. > There's also another dialing plan -- all toll calls are dialed with a > 1 first. If its inside your area code, you dial eight digits; if its > outside your area code, you dial 11 digits. This is the way it was in > 206 until last year when we were switched to 1-206 for all toll calls. You're completely missing John's point, which is that the scheme you describe (eight-digit dialing for intra-NPA long distance) is an old hack whose time has now gone. Eight-digit dialing only works well when no exchange in that area code matches some other area code. However, as you've seen recently in 206-land, quite a few areas have now been forced to introduce N0X and N1X exchanges (like John's 802 example), which causes the aforementioned ambiguities unless 8-digit dialing is replaced by 7- or 11-digit dialing. (The ambiguity can otherwise be resolved only by the ugly practices of using a time-out after the eigth digit, or (for touch-tone phones only) using a '#' tone as the number terminator.) And it will get even worse in 1995, when the first NNX area code (334 in Alabama) appears. By then, every area in the NANP should have eliminated eight-digit dialing. Bob Goudreau Data General Corporation goudreau@dg-rtp.dg.com 62 Alexander Drive +1 919 248 6231 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA ------------------------------ From: jmiller@afit.af.mil (Jeff Miller) Subject: Re: Choosing LD service Organization: Air Force Institute of Technology Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1993 23:00:48 GMT > You see, I don't care about price, quality, and all those > things because I know about 10XXX+ dialing. What I want to do is make > money by switching my long distance service, so I want to know which > carrier I should subscribe to to maximize my chance of getting a check > from another carrier to switch my service over. The impression I have > is that AT&T seems to send checks out to MCI subscribers, since this > happened to a friend of mine whose landlord broke his lease, kicked > him out, and changed the service on that line to MCI. [Don't ask how > we know that] He got a letter from AT&T offering him $70 to slam that > number, so he happily cashed it. Well, I'm a Sprint customer, and got a nice $75 check from AT&T a month ago. I've also been trying to decide if I should take them up on the offer, or use it to wangle some free calls out of Sprint. Seems to me we had a discussion on this three months ago or so ... perhaps the esteemed Moderator could give us a pointer to which issues in the archive apply? Jeff Miller, NH6ZW/N8, AFA1HE (ex WD6CQV, AFA8JM, AFA1DO) AFIT School of Engineering, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH [Moderator's Note: Not off hand I can't tell you which issues, although this discussion comes up from time to time. The way to find subjects or authors in back issues (volumes nine through twelve -- 1989 to 1992) is by getting the archives file 'index-vol.9-10-11.subj.Z' and/or the file 'index-vol.12.subj.Z'. These are compressed files, so pull them from the archives (anonymous ftp lcs.mit.edu) with the type set to 'I' for binary files. Uncompress them at your site -- not at the archives, thank you! heh heh! ... 'grep Intro ' for a help file built into the indexes. I suggest you be very liberal in your arguments to grep; ie don't check up/low case, and use wild cards frequently, etc. If you are too loose in your search, you will get flooded with subject titles or author names. If you are too tight, you will not get a hit, or not the hit you are looking for. Experient with it. You can search for author names in these indexes as well. These are called accelerated indexes: all they do is point to volumes and *groups of fifty issues* in which the subject line or author name can be found. You take the information gleaned from the indexes and then go back to the archives and pull the *file of fifty issues*. You get that to your site and you start your grep search all over within that group of issues. For volume 13 (this year) there is no index as of yet. I suppose I should work up one for the first half of this year, but it takes a bit of work. Prior to volume 9 (1989) no index is available as of yet ... just one more thing waiting for time to work on since the issues before that date were not in the same format as now and I have not yet figured out how to automatically create an index for those files. To get the information you want from this year until the index is prepared, grep the various back issues. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1993 22:57:47 -0400 From: Monty Solomon Subject: Re: Newton MessagePad Now Available From Apple > The words "Now Available" in the subject line are an exaggeration. I > spent yesterday rattling doors to try to buy one, and I'll share the > details with you. But NPR and other news sources say that unless you > snagged one of the several thousand units for sale in Boston at the > MacWorld Expo this week, you're out of luck until around Labor Day. Computer City, CompUSA, and Computer Town have them in stock. They also have many of the accessories. They all have the Newton Communications Kit. The Newton Professional Communications Kit is not available yet. Computer Town $797 603 893 8812 / 800 666 0004 Computer City $869 508 626 2800 CompUSA $899 508 875 8300 > But right now, there are a few flies in the ointment. Aside from the > delayed availability, the dealers who did have prices said they could > only sell it in bundled systems, the Newton Communications Kit and the > Newton Professional Communications Kit. Lechmere and Computer City sell the basic Newton MessagePad for $699. All of the Newton accessories are also available thru the Apple Catalog 800 795 1000. Monty Solomon / PO Box 2486 / Framingham, MA 01701-0405 monty%roscom@think.com ------------------------------ From: dave@westmark.com (Dave Levenson) Subject: Re: Victory For 900 Users: FTC Rules Announced Organization: Westmark, Inc. Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 02:05:45 GMT > [Moderator's Note: Maybe I am missing something here. Every UUCP-style > account I have ever seen requires that the host have a daemon-user by > I know (or am pretty sure) that UUNET has an anonymous > FTP-like thing running on a 900 number, but anonymous UUCP? How does > that work? How could the host possibly know how to hand out mail and > news under the circumstances? PAT] Anonymous UUCP is supported by most versions of UNIX -- not for delivery of addressed communications such as mail or news, but for file transfers (much like anonymous ftp). Anyone may enter a command like: uucp uunet!~/ftp/sources/something mysystem!~/my_dir/ and receive the file. If the user's system is recognized as a UUNET subscriber, then this call may be placed to their 800 or 703 or other telephone number. Otherwise, it may be placed to their 900 number. Dave Levenson Internet: dave@westmark.com Westmark, Inc. UUCP: {uunet | rutgers | att}!westmark!dave Stirling, NJ, USA Voice: 908 647 0900 Fax: 908 647 6857 ------------------------------ From: macy@fmsys.fmsystm.ncoast.org (Macy Hallock) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1993 23:20:18 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: macy@telemax.com Subject: Re: Looking For Information and Experience With LCI > Does anyone have any experience with LCI? I have a firend who is > thinking about useing some of LCI's services and he would like to know LCI does a fine job. I can reccomend them based on personal experience as a telecom engineer. A few notes that may be of interest: They are not a nationwide company, but connect to several other regional carriers (and all of the other major carriers) to handle their nationwide requirements. For switched dialup services, my experience with them has been first rate. I've got customers using them for substantial volumes of incoming and outgoing calls, with good results. Both 1+ customers and T-1 access clients like the service and the price, too. I'm a bit less happy with their leased line services that connect to other carriers (but I am pleased with leased line service wholly within their own system). I've had a couple of finger pointing episodes with LCI where they connected to another carrier for some lines going to southern states via a third carrier. (In every case the fault was _not_ LCI's, BTW). LCI is the only major carrier that will work with me on technical issues directly with Central Office people, who will change programming or configurations to immediatly repair, modify or alter a service to put a client back into service. Every other carrier gives me the run-around or ignorant droids, which I have to bypass in order to get things fixed. I use LCI for my personal and our company's services. I really like their Feature Group B access, which other companies are backing off on ... Regards, Macy Hallock N8OBG Voice= +1.216.723.3030 Fax= +1.216.723.3223 macy@telemax.com Telemax Inc. and F M Systems Inc. 152 Highland Drive Medina, Ohio 44256 USA [Moderator's Note: I've found regards Orange Card billing matters and such they are quite cooperative also. OC customer service goes through their office in Pennsylvania. PAT] ------------------------------ From: Paul.Houle@leotech.MV.COM (Paul Houle) Reply-To: houle@leotech.MV.COM Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1993 14:05:00 Subject: Re: Movie: In the Line of Fire > After reading this Digest for a couple of years, I'm kind of > skeptical of these ideas. It would have made sense to me if the > assassin had been calling through 1-900-STOPPER (though it would > have taken too much explanation to the telecom-illiterate), but > what do you other readers think? Is there reason to believe that > any end-user device could spoof ANI? Could a government agency > run a trace without telco assistance? (Let's exclude speculations > about the NSA, since we all know they're magic and can do > anything. ;-) I had some phriends who did some experimentation in the late 80's attempting to spoof ANI feeds; they had read some documents describing the protocols used to communicate between IXCs and local carriers. Using an analog interface, a sequence of MF tone pulses is used to transmit the calling and called numbers as well as some information about the calling station and class of call. Attempts were made with a number of carriers to transmit tones to both spoof and disrupt ANI transmissions during call setup, but these were unsuccessful. What they ~were~ able to do is send false packets to certain "third party" AOS services, the ones that blow you off with 2600 hz when you ask to speak to a local or AT&T operator. On some of these services, the IXC-local interface resets when this happens, and puts you through to a local operator when the trunk times out. They discovered that it was possible to send these guys a homemade ANI/called number packet, although there are a large number of countermeasures that could be put into this kind of system to prevent this. The bad guy in "In the Line of Fire" had a briefcase full of electronic equipment, which would be consistent with this kind of attack, which allows one to direct the ANI anywhere. Also, on some SxS switches, one could disrupt transmission of the ANI spill to the IXC by flashing the switchook an operator comes on the line and says "What number are you calling from?" and enters the ANI information by hand. To misdirect ANI, there are a number of approaches based on using somebody else's dialtone as well. This would include 1-900-STOPPER, climbing a telephone pole, and the abuse of PBXs and call-forwarding devices, all of which can be done without any additional props. However, the guy in the movie did seem to have the ability to transmit an arbitrary number for ANI, since the secret service busted in on an innocent family. BTW, what number do calls from 1-900-STOPPER appear to call from? What happens when "The Joker" sees this number? So far as running a trace without Telco "assistance", this has been done many times by people who gained unauthorized access to Telco computers. It wouldn't suprise me if certain government agencies had already made agreements with various carriers to make certain information availible; if one could get real-time access to switches, a smart "joker" could probably get through 1-900-STOPPR rather easily. Origin: NETIS (603)432-2517/432-0922 (HST/V32) (1:132/189) ------------------------------ From: scottyb@access.digex.net (Scott Bridgewater) Subject: Re: Do We Have a Theme Song? Date: 7 Aug 1993 19:27:53 -0400 Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA How about "Jocko Homo" on the touch tone telephone from the album "DEVOTEES"? If not... "Telstar" (!) sb ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #551 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id ab22386; 8 Aug 93 3:28 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA25266 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Sun, 8 Aug 1993 01:01:33 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA01532 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Sun, 8 Aug 1993 01:01:00 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 01:01:00 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308080601.AA01532@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #552 TELECOM Digest Sun, 8 Aug 93 01:01:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 552 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Radar Detectors (Cliff Sharp) Re: Radar Detectors (was Re: New AM Band Violates ...) (Dave Levenson) Re: Reflections on Hacker Sentencing (Michael Covington) Re: 950 Calling Cards (Marshall Levin) Re: PCPursuit Service Still Around? (Jon Carmichael) Ring Detector Circuit (John J. Butz) PacBell Call Return (Randy Gellens) New Use For Orange Cards (J. Philip Miller) Local Calls via LD Carrier? (Paul Theodoropoulos) Reccomendation For Caller-ID Box Requested (Jeff Wasilko) Is Fiber Coming to New Jersey? (Steve Kass) How Does Switched-56 Interwork With ISDN? (Daniel R. Kegel) Administrivia: Looking to the Week Ahead of Us (TELECOM Moderator) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Radar Detectors Date: Sat, 7 Aug 93 5:25:35 CDT From: Cliff Sharp I earlier wrote about radar detectors and offered a defense. TELECOM Moderator noted in reply: > [Moderator's Note: First, try that explanation around here and a lot > of Chicago police would be upside your head in a minute. Second, for True, but they'd do the same in any other matter where they tried to assert jurisdiction while having none. > all your knowledge of FCC regs, how come you failed to mention the one > which specifically says you are forbidden to act upon or profit from > transmissions you happen to overhear which are not intended for you? Well, first, you're not forbidden to act upon overhearing a transmission, you're forbidden to act upon its content. Similarly, you can't profit from the content, but there's no prohibition against profiting from knowing that someone's on the air (although I can't imagine too many other uses for that tidbit of information). > What you hear on WGN-Channel 9 is intended for you to act upon and > benefit from, i.e. the sponsor's messages. Radio transmissions in the > frequency range where RADAR (it is an acronym for something, I forget RAdio Detection And Ranging. > what right now) are *not* broadcasts. They are transmissions by > (presumably) licensed radio operators and/or their employees (the > police). They are not for your ears. There's a Supreme Court decision on that; I lost the papers during my last move, but the folks at Escort (formerly Cincinnati Microwave) are happy to send out their radar packet to anyone who asks, and it's cited in there chapter and verse. Paraphrased, the Supreme Court Justice who wrote the decision said something to the effect that if the police can use sneaky, surreptitious means to spy on your activities (and in most cases without probable cause), the citizen has every right to avail himself of any and all means to detect such spying. But radar transmissions are broadcasts anyway. They are rarely specifically aimed, but sent to bounce off many cars (whether or not the operator can see many cars in the beam path) and detect the greatest frequency deviation caused by the Doppler effect. I believe 47 CFR 90 defines them that way, but don't have a copy to refer to and can't confirm. This is because the police aren't transmitting to themselves or other officers, but transmitting to the vehicle(s) and monitoring the echo. > How do you act upon or benefit from what you overhear on RADAR? You > slow your car down don't you? You act in your own best interest to > avoid a ticket, don't you? That amounts to acknowledging that you > overheard something on the radio, which is illegal to do. You can't See the Supreme Court mention above; the Supremes don't agree. In any event, the primary reason I bought a radar detector wasn't to speed. First, my very first speeding ticket was a fraud, and only luck got me out of it; the officer who wrote it had been thrown off the force before I got to court, and the unofficial scuttlebutt was that some judge had noticed that all his tickets for any given day showed exactly the same speed. He was apparently getting one good reading and using the same reading all day without resetting his gun. Had I had a detector at that time, I could have asked the officer to repeat his performance of getting a reading on me without setting off my detector, and could have testified in court that he wasn't transmitting when I was within his range, had he not been caught at it. The second reason is that everyone (now, admit it) can get a bit heavy on the foot without realizing it from time to time. If I toss a gum wrapper on the sidewalk, seldom do I get more of a reaction than "Pick it up", i.e. I get a second chance to correct my "error". With radar I don't get that chance. The detector serves to remind me to check my speed and make sure I'm doing what I wanted to do, that is to stay within the limits (or at least with the speed of traffic). Finally, there are occasional reasons where I use the detector to speed with impunity. Most of them involve those clowns who do 75 to pass me and then slow down to 40 until I pass them again. Once I had a bleeding passenger who had to get to the hospital fast, and didn't need the aggravation of bleeding at 25 MPH or that of bleeding at 0 MPH while some officer wasted five precious minutes stopping me. > two-way radio transmissions then benefit from them is illegal. You > also seem somehow to think that a local police officer cannot detain > or arrest you for violations of federal law. They certainly can; they > can take cases to the US Attorney just as easily as they can take They can most certainly detain you in their capacity as duly authorized agents of the law, but they cannot confiscate property that does not cause an immediate danger to anyone or anything, and once the Feds are in on it their only recourse is to act as witnesses to the act. That takes the whole thing out of the purview of state law, which is the only place that radar detectors are banned. > cases to the local prosecutor. Most cops would tell you that you have > a smart mouth. PAT] With good reason, I might add. :-) But again, they'd do the same in any situation where they tried to assert jurisdiction or authority they didn't have. And there's always the alternative of building a 100 watt transmit- ter at 10.495 GHz and calling a Morse code CQ whenever I see a squad .. :-) I don't have the 800 number handy, but I believe Escort Corp. still sends out those "radar packets" free for those who'd like to see the court citations and quotes from the justice. ------------------------------ From: dave@westmark.com (Dave Levenson) Subject: Re: Radar Detectors (was Re: New AM Band Violates ...) Organization: Westmark, Inc. Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 02:35:35 GMT > frequency range where RADAR (it is an acronym for something, I forget > what right now) are *not* broadcasts. They are transmissions by RADAR = RAdio Direction And Rangefinding Dave Levenson Internet: dave@westmark.com Westmark, Inc. UUCP: {uunet | rutgers | att}!westmark!dave Stirling, NJ, USA Voice: 908 647 0900 Fax: 908 647 6857 [Moderator's Note: While your at it then, how about SONAR and LORAN and ELF? 'Radar' is one of those acronymns which has turned into a word on its own ... much like NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) and CARE (Committee on American Relief in Europe). Got any other examples of 'words' which are really acronymns instead? PAT] ------------------------------ From: mcovingt@aisun3.ai.uga.edu (Michael Covington) Subject: Re: Reflections on Hacker Sentencing Organization: AI Programs, University of Georgia, Athens Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 04:18:25 GMT Couple of quick points: (1) G. K. Chesterton's concept of the criminal as artistic prankster is a nice anticipation of one type of cracker. (See some of the Father Brown stories.) (2) There's more than one kind of cracker. (a) The "joyrider": - pure technological triumph; hacking to show what can be done - common before 1985 or so, becoming rare. (b) The "antihero": - wants to assume the social and cultural role of a "hacker"; - expects to be admired by someone; - may have little real interest in technology, and no originality of technique; - more destructive than type (a), simply because he wants to make an _impression_ rather than achieve a secret technical success; - post-1985, grew up on video games. (c) The truly malicious: (fortunately still rare). Michael A. Covington, Associate Research Scientist Artificial Intelligence Programs mcovingt@ai.uga.edu The University of Georgia phone 706 542-0358 Athens, Georgia 30602-7415 U.S.A. amateur radio N4TMI ------------------------------ From: mlevin@nyx.cs.du.edu (Marshall Levin) Subject: Re: 950 Calling Cards Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci. Date: Sun, 8 Aug 93 04:36:58 GMT dan.srebnick@islenet.com writes: > I work in a facility served by an ESS CO Centrex. The telephone > company has a toll restriction on most lines. Unfortunately, this > seems to restrict outgoing 800 calls as well as the ability to dial a > 0+ call. I'm looking for a carrier that offers 950 access on their > calling cards. I am not restricted from dialing 950-xxxx calls. In addition to being able to use the 800 number, I have found that I can use my MCI card with 950-1022 by dialing 950-1022 + destination number + card number. Hope that helps, Marshall ------------------------------ Subject: Re: PCPursuit Service Still Around? From: jon.carmichael@uplherc.upl.com (Jon Carmichael) Date: 7 Aug 93 19:12:00 GMT Organization: The Continuum PCBoard - Pasadena, CA - 818-441-2625 Reply-To: jon.carmichael@uplherc.upl.com (Jon Carmichael) > [Moderator's Note: PC Pursuit is still around, and operated by Sprint > over in (I think) Reston, VA. Try 1-800-TELENET but I am not certain. > I do not think however PC Pursuit is designed for quite the > application your associate has in mind. PAT] Acutally it is, ... they have a daytime version of the same (PCPursuit) network, where connect time is billed at 3.50 or 4.50 dollars per hour. You have a monthly minimum of $90.00, but for business day use. It is intended where speed is not important and saving money is. It's still a good deal. JONC The Continuum PCBoard -*- @9600+ call 818-441-2625 @2400- call 818-799-9633 ------------------------------ From: John.J.Butz@att.com Date: Fri, 6 Aug 93 11:50:16 EDT Subject: Ring Detector Circuit Help! Could someone reply directly to me with an answer to following: What are the specs for a ring signal, so I can build a simple circuit to latch on detection of a ring. Scanning the archives revealed liitle info to answer my question. J Butz ER700 Sys Eng jbutz@hogpa.att.com AT&T - CCS ------------------------------ From: RANDY@MPA15AB.mv-oc.Unisys.COM Date: 06 AUG 93 20:21 Subject: PacBell Call Return When I first started using Call Return, I noticed that if the returned call was toll, it would appear on my bill with the last four digits replaced by "****" (to prevent disclosure of the number, since CLID is not offered). On my most recent bill, however, there was a toll returned call, and the last four digits were displayed. The bill now identifies calls as "direct" or "return" and notes that on returned calls, 'private' numbers are not shown. Not sure what they mean by 'private' since normal usage would mean a CLID-suppressed number, but without CLID, that doesn't make sense. They may mean non-published. Randy Gellens randy@mv-oc.unisys.com A Series System Software [if mail bounces, please Unisys Corporation forward bounce msg to Mission Viejo, CA rgellens@mcimail.com] Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak only for myself| ------------------------------ From: phil@wubios.wustl.edu (J. Philip Miller) Subject: New Use For Orange Cards Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1993 18:37:56 -0500 (CDT) Here is Missouri we have finally gotten CallerID and I quickly signed up thinking that I could delete call return, call blocker, and select- ive ring. As I started thinking about it, it became clear that there was an aspect of loss of privacy that I had never heard discussed in the many years of reading the Digest -- now if I called home, or the office, they would know where I was! Normally this is, of course, no problem. Since all calls out of the medical center show the same, generic number, there is no problem with whether I am in my office or someone elses. I quickly did note that when I called from my cellular phone, it registered as "Out of Area." Now I do not know why that is, particularly since my cellular service is from the B carrier -- SWBT, the same one that provides the CallerID service. It quickly dawned upon me, that I could use my friendly Orange Card, kindly provided by the Moderator to also place an "Out of Area" call and the recepient could not tell where I was -- and at a rather reasonable cost even for a local call! J. Philip Miller, Professor, Division of Biostatistics, Box 8067 Washington University Medical School, St. Louis MO 63110 phil@wubios.WUstl.edu - (314) 362-3617 [362-2693(FAX)] [Moderator's Note: Yes, you can do that. You can also accomplis the same goal with Talk Tickets. For more info, see me after the show! PAT] ------------------------------ From: pt@crl.com (paul theodoropoulos) Subject: Local Calls via LD Carrier? Date: 7 Aug 1993 18:20:25 -0700 I have a fuzzy recollection of postings in the Digest some time back discussing ways to use one's long distance provider to make "local" calls. The reason of course is to save money on the outrageous amounts the local telcos sometimes charge (as I suffered this past month, calling a friend sixty miles away, and through the nose for the privilege). I also have very fuzzy recollection that there was some question as to the legality of it. Is my memory faulty, and on the off chance it *isn't*, can you provide more information? paul theodoropoulos pt@crl.com diogenes@well.sf.ca.us [Moderator's Note: Long distance carriers have to file tariffs with state regulatory agencies in order to handle local calls, which some of them do. Whether or not it is less expensive is an applications thing for each user. You certainly have to dial extra digits to send your calls that way. I think you will see in the next few years the distinction between 'local carrier' and 'long distance company' be- comes very blurred as the LD companies begin handling more and more local service. Most of them are happy to have calls terminated right at the subscriber's premises now rather than paying the local telco access fees. And programs like AT&T's Easy Reach 700 service allow calls to be placed within the local telco's LATA quite easily. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1993 22:52:35 -0800 From: jeffw@triple-i.com (Jeff Wasilko) Subject: Reccomendation For Caller-ID Box Requested I'm getting Caller-ID service, so I need a box. I remember a thread recently about a box with a hard to read display, so I'd like to know which one to get (and which ones to avoid). Thanks, Jeff Wasilko, Information International +1 617 275 7070 Application Support Specialist ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1993 23:26:33 -0400 (EDT) From: SKASS@DREW.DREW.EDU Subject: Is Fiber Coming to New Jersey? I have heard rumors in the neighborhood that my town, Madison, NJ, along with neighboring Chatham and Florham Park, will be equipped with a fiber optic telephone network, as a demonstration site, by the end of 1994. Can anyone verify this, give details (fiber right to my network interface?), or tell me what this will mean for me? Steve Kass/ Math and CS/ Drew U/ Madison, NJ 07940 201-514-1187/ skass@drew.drew.edu ------------------------------ From: dank@blacks.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Daniel R. Kegel) Subject: How Does Switched-56 Interwork With ISDN? Date: 7 Aug 93 22:54:36 GMT Organization: Image Analysis Systems Group, JPL Hi, I am trying to figure out what equipment I need to let a PC connect to a switched-56 line and transfer files to another PC connected to an ISDN line using the ZMODEM file transfer protocol. One thing that I can't figure out is how a 56 kilobit/sec line can talk to a 64 kilobit/sec line. Where do the rates get matched, and does either of the PC's have to know how to do/undo the rate adaptation? My ideal system would consist of a single plugin card for the PC at either end, and no separate DSU or TA. It would also have terminal emulation software for both ends that can do ZMODEM file transfers and provide a simple 'host mode' (a la procomm) that lets one PC act as a server which waits for phone calls, verifies username and password, then lets the caller select which directory they want to transfer files from/to. Dan Kegel ------------------------------ From: TELECOM Moderator Subject: Administrivia: Looking at the Week Ahead of Us Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1993 00:21:00 CDT Later this week marks the twelfth anniversary of the beginning of TELECOM Digest. August 11 is the day, if I can keeo things up and running until then ... :( The week ahead promises to be a difficult one where The Phone Company is concerned with bills due and past due, and TPC making their usual noises. The financial condition of the Digest is slowly improving and as the residuals come in from the various affinity programs offered, there is a light, oh so distant, at the end of the tunnel which began for me earlier this year. Telepassport is taking a bit of time each day, and the residuals from that are still about a month or more away. The Mutual of New York people (MONY) have a couple thousand dollars of my money which is also about six weeks away from arriving. Things loom so close, yet not close enough where TPC and others like it are concerned. Plans in the next few months include a reorganization of the Archives, more indexes and reference material and hopefully a dialup where the Archives and the Digest can be obtained by anyone calling in. There may possibly be a fax version of the Digest available as well. Please remember that TELECOM Digest production expenses including the phone lines, archives and editorial costs are met entirely by myself with the generous support of readers like yourself who want to see the Digest continue as a high-quality mailing list and moderated newsgroup. For a decade now, Usenet's comp.dcom.telecom newsgroup as been the gateway newsgroup to the Digest and the 'mainstream' newsgroup for telecommunications news, views and general discussion. Many readers have contributed handsomely and generously in the past; others have made modest but meaningful financial contributions within their means. If everyone who reads the Digest regularly and benefits from it sent one dollar *per year*, the financial burdens involved with production costs, phone bills, etc would vanish forever. As you feel it appropriate, support the Digest financially. There is no connection between what appears in the Digest and what benefactors choose to do or not do. I keep on being myself and sending this your way; you keep on reading/writing and helping as you see fit. There are no subscription fees required to be here with us; learning from us and teaching us. That's what its all about! Your donations appreciated, and they may be made payable to TELECOM Digest and sent to the office. Telecom Digest / 2241 West Howard Street #208 / Chicago, IL 60645 USA Thank you! PAT ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #552 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa08240; 8 Aug 93 14:28 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA25966 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Sun, 8 Aug 1993 12:11:39 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA12662 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Sun, 8 Aug 1993 12:11:05 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 12:11:05 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308081711.AA12662@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #553 TELECOM Digest Sun, 8 Aug 93 12:11:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 553 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Experience With USWest Phone Service (Joan Kroll) Cordless (Not Cellular) Modem Interface (Steven Hodas) PC Emulator For Teletel/Minitel/Videotext Needed (itsik@onyx.co.il) Re: T1, Internet Access (Barton Bruce) Re: T1, Internet Access (Brad Cox) Re: Modem/Data Tax - Technically Possible (David Lemson) Re: Modem/Data Tax - Technically Possible (Floyd Davidson) Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address (Ray Normandeau) Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address (Pat Turner) Re: L.A. Cellular Telephone Complaint (Steven H. Lichter) Re: Handsets For the Hearing Impaired (Nigel Allen) Re: Radar Detectors (was Re: New AM Band Violates ...) (Gregory M. Paris) Re: Need Sources/Info For Cheap Voicemail (Al Varney) Re: Area 205 to Split (Patton Turner) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Experience With USWest Phone Service From: cmptech!jkroll@csn.org (Joan Kroll) Date: Sun, 08 Aug 93 01:16:22 MDT Organization: Computech BBS at 719.260.6279 - Colorado Springs, CO We just left Houston for Colorado Springs about six weeks ago. Since then we have enjoyed the low crime and traffic, clean air and gentle people. It seems the only predator out here is our friendly telephone monopoly. I say friendly because the phone answerers (BOPs -- babes on phones as the teen boys say) ARE cordial -- they're just untrained and apt to take your instructions and forget, change, manipulate, mutilate, cancel them, ad infinitum ... Here's what happened the first week: 1. Ordered additional phone line to supplement the two we already had installed before we moved into our house. What did they do? The cut off our two lines and activated a third. We only found this out when our contacts called upset about the recording telling them that our numbers had been disconnected! We also requested UNLISTED numbers. Big mistake. These gals take this stuff personally, I guess. It took four weeks of calling directory assistance and getting our three phone numbers from the teledroids to convince USW that they hadn't done their jobs. Yet, all their documentation said it had been done, then double and triple checked!! By what??? Monkeys with keyboards? I won't go into the confusion, frustration and hyperventillation I suffered trying to get different services and long distance carriers for different lines! The people at USW ought to publish these incidents in their own TELEBLOOPERS DIGEST -- they'd make millions! Before I called them, I'd say a prayer and drink tequila shooters just to numb the pain I knew would be coming. I'm glad I never had to order anything SPECIAL from them cause it sure seemed that every request from fourth request for phone books to tenth requests to put my damned long distance carrier back on my line to my final mistake: ORDERING A FOURTH LINE! They lied about the installation date. (at least the guy showed up when I had proper clothes on -- the other guy banged at my dining room window and found half of us in our skivvies -- he could have rung our front door bell, but that would have required a few living brain cells) Then after it was finally installed at the demarc, it provided dial tone for a while then after a few hours, there wasn't even battery on the line. Two promised repair dates later they strung a wire from the demarc across the grass, behind the deck, across the neighboring field and to the telco box by the curb. In the process, they smashed flower pots and left the mess for you know who. But the line worked! Its been a month since they fixed line four, but the wire is still draped across my property out in the open. Its great to mow the lawn around your own phone line. But, I should have faith, after all they did promise to send out a work crew to bury the critter only three weeks ago! I don't want to go into the rest of it. All I can say is that in the move FUN WITH DICK AND JANE, I still cheer when they rob the phone company -- and now you know why! jkroll%cmptech.uucp@csn.org (Joan Kroll) This came from Computech BBS .... +1 719.260.6279 in Colorado Springs, CO. ------------------------------ From: hhll@stein.u.washington.edu (Steven Hodas) Subject: Cordless (Not Cellular) Modem Interface Date: 8 Aug 1993 08:13:33 GMT Organization: University of Washington Is there any reason you couldn't patch a modem into a standard handset from a cordless phone? What would it take? Steven Hodas School of Education University of Washington Leadership and Policy Studies 206.285.5734 hhll@u.washington.edu ------------------------------ From: cirs@aristo.tau.ac.il (Cirs account) Subject: PC Emulator For Teletel/Minitel/Videotext Needed Organization: Tel-Aviv University Computation Center Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 08:47:18 GMT We need an emulator for PC that runs the TELETEL terminal. We also need information about T100/T101 Standards. Please email me directly at: itsik@onyx.co.il. Thanks, Itsik ------------------------------ From: Barton.Bruce@camb.com Subject: Re: T1, Internet Access Organization: Digital Equipment Computer Users Society Date: 8 Aug 93 03:25:18 -0400 In article , MARK EARLE <73117.351@ CompuServe.COM> writes: > Maybe I'm calling/emailing the wrong folks, but so far no direct, > simple answers have come forth. Objective: Find out the costs to set > up a service which would offer dial up access to Internet facilities. > We envision something similiar to netcom.com. Callers dial with > "standard" modems over plain old telephone service. They get a unix > The 'Unix' part is easy to cost out. The unknowns are: How do I get an > "internet" connection? Where? Via what media? What does it cost, who Who are the active regional Internet access providers in your area? Failing them, try PSI, Alternet, or even (yuk) ANS. Sprint's SprintLink is also good. They are clean and professional - you are not cutting into their game. You are a GOOD typical potential customer now that they have decided who they need to sell to. From Sprint you will be able to resell even SLIP dialup service, but would ALSO need to be a CIX member to resell anything heavier. If you have $s to blow monthly, let Sprint supply a cisco and the FT1 csu/dsu. Far better BUY a cisco 2000 (should be enough for what you described, else get a 3000), and a FT1 csu/dsu. Sprint techs MUST have your cisco's password and be able to telnet or access it via SNMP. You can start low speed at maybe 128kb over the T1, and can change on a few days notice to the next speed for a nominal $250 processing fee. $s for bandwidth is more like for the log of the speed. t1 is about $2700 per month and 128 is probably ~ $1200 (without actually looking it up) + the T1 loop to their POP. Buy low and grow as needed despite the temptation to start big at 384 or 512kb. > Best way to get an initial batch of 50 lines and then have > expandability. Centrex, T1, and other things are mentioned. I can't > imagine 50 or 500 RJ-11's and that many external modems laying around. > Surely "something" exists that essentially takes t1 from the phone You bet something exists, but you probably can't afford it. The two vendors of T1 to modem to pad/terminal_server/slip_engine to router all in the same rack and all without a rats nest of wires want serious $s. Primary Access sells to AT&T, Sprint, UPS, Compu$werve class customers. Their traditional rack takes only 20 T1s and all 480 calls wind up lumped on x.25 lines off to someones antique x.25 net. They have noticed their market has changed and are rapidly redesigning for modern terminal servers rather than x.25 pads. LAT, Telnet, SLIP, CSLIP, PPP, should all be supported and the resulting ethernet should then go to your choice of router to some wan port -- possibly frame relay, ATM or FDDI for campus or remote POP use. For you, the ethernet will be fine. USR has noticed Primary Acceses unique spot in the market and is making a much newer design that in a 7" high box supports only two T1s (48 ports), but has some nice innovations. Four high speed busses, three actually initially used, do the work -- no rats nest. They have the modems on DSP cards, but the front end can be other cards for T1, or yet others for ISDN Basic or ISDN PRI, or even POTS phone lines. In many areas, telco T1 is a ripoff or not available. Use POTS front end cards. When telco wakes up, use T1. The actual modem or terminal server portion is unchanged. Neither company is so stupid as to try to reinvent terminal servers or routers, but will integrate from selected other vendors. Obviously, ISDN can be handled, too! As can voice or FAX applications. Note also that both support FG-B and FG-D as well as vanilla D4 format T1 signaling. This means that on equal access to POP situations (10xxx) or FG-B (950) they have not only what you dialed (DNIS) to get there (the same trunks might serve several access codes) as well as who you are (ANI), and they can very well selectively provide different services or just simply route you internally to the ethernet of the implied recipient where the IXC provides contract private labled services for several entities all out of the verysame rack of hardware. USR claims that at $1000/port minimum, they are 1/2 of Primary Access. So go buy a pile of USR Sportsters at $175 each, buy a DEC DS700 16 port job at 41% software developer discount off the $3200, and get a cheap rack and a barrel of West-Taiwanese rs232 cables from computer shopper at 95 cents each and you are in business. Get your phone lines delivered to a RJ21X block -- 66 punch in to 25 pair Amphenol out. Don't get ripped by telco for $125 for the block. FCC ruling allows YOU to provide it and it costs maybe $30 at Graybar. Do spend the BIG bucks for RJ21x in and out lightinig protector of serious grade. I have been using Porta Systems 581 blocks with their Delta Modules. These are SERIOUS CO grade protectors, but the 581 block no longer is available RJ21x in, but only out, so you have to punch down a cable on the 66 in side and actually its best to punch both sides as the 66 to 66 version is far cheapest. But now, ITW's Links division HAS a new protector series JUST available and has not only RJ21X in and out but has gender choice even. Rugged protection for all 25 pair. Anixter is their big stocking distributor. A short connectorized cable form the actual RJ21X block itself goes to protection, and then another longer cable (that otherwise would have gone immediately to the RJ21X block) goes from protection to the rack. Elcheapo 25 pair cable with connectors ($30 for a prefab 100 footer, less for shorter) gets you to your rack and lets you move or relocate things easily. At the rack, use a 25 port 'harmonica' to break out the cable to 25 RJ11 jacks. $200-$400 here is VERY well spent. Get a serious ground but one BONDED to the power ground so no potential difference exists between differnet wires entering your rack. Get serious power protection. too. Don't stack any think like modems more than three or four deep, and look for cheap easily mounted power strips for all the wall-warts. Each DS700 can run all 16 ports at 115.2kb and with the newest optional s/w does LAT, Telnet, SLIP, CSLIP, PPP, and can use Kerberos. Or look at Zyplex, Xylogics, Livingston, cisco, Telebit or many others. If some alternate carrier like Met Fiber or Teleport Systems is colocating with local telcos, and you want 'presence' in several areas to provide local dial access, see if you can cut a deal for a colocated rack in these guy's POP, or even contract for them to locate your stuff in telco's space! They may be able to get T1s to you cheap. For that type location, you WILL NEED Primay Access or the newer USR rack mount T1 fed systems, and possibly in the -48VCD rather than the 110VAC version! You may be able to resell Telnet access to other local BBSes out of your 'POPs'. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 07:39:55 -0500 From: bcox@gmu.edu (Brad Cox) Subject: Re: T1, Internet Access MARK EARLE <73117.351@CompuServe.COM> wrote: > Best way to get an initial batch of 50 lines and then have > expandability. Centrex, T1, and other things are mentioned. I can't > imagine 50 or 500 RJ-11's and that many external modems laying around. > Surely "something" exists that essentially takes t1 from the phone > company and gives me seperate sync or async lines that the unix system > can deal with. I'm responding to the group because I'm really not sure why Telnet, Tymnet, Sprintnet and so forth isn't this fellow's answer. Compuserve and America Online use them extensively, hiding whatever the cost to them is inside the subscriber's fee. The costs can't be *too* exorbitant, given that AOL's fee is only $9.50/mo. > I'm in Corpus Christi, TX if that makes any difference. Replies to > the Digest OK, or possibly, to my email and I'll summarize. Thanks! I don't understand why this shouldn't work for Unix systems too, especialy since it delivers connectivity via a local call from everywhere to anywhere. Brad Cox; bcox@gmu.edu; 703 968 8229 Voice 703 968 8798 Fax George Mason Program on Social and Organizational Learning ------------------------------ From: lemson@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (David Lemson) Subject: Re: Modem/Data Tax - Technically Possible Date: 8 Aug 1993 14:30:18 GMT Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Reply-To: lemson@uiuc.edu Christopher Zguris <0004854540@mcimail.com> writes: > I have service from MCI and I know they offer to code fax lines as fax > lines on the bill -- but they rely on me telling them which lines are > carrying data. I have two or three lines that carry data and/or fax I recommend against letting MCI know which lines are fax lines. About a year ago, I was sending a few overseas faxes from my home number and got a few wrong numbers in the batch. I called customer service to try to get them credited (even a one minute call is several dollars). At first I told them that I was making fax calls and when I finally got to a customer service person, they told me that their computers were down at the time but that they wouldn't issue credit for wrong numbers on fax calls anyway. I waited a day, called again, and told them that I was making regular voice calls and got wrong numbers and they cheerfully took them off the bill. (the computers were working properly this time) David Lemson (217) 244-1205 University of Illinois Computing & Comm Services Office System Administrator Internet : lemson@uiuc.edu UUCP :...!uiucuxc!uiucux1!lemson NeXTMail & MIME accepted BITNET : LEMSON@UIUCVMD [Moderator's Note: What do they have against giving credit for fax wrong numbers? PAT] ------------------------------ From: floyd@hayes.ims.alaska.edu (Floyd Davidson) Subject: Re: Modem/Data Tax - Technically Possible Organization: University of Alaska Computer Network Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 06:21:49 GMT In article Bruce Sullivan writes: > Now, before you all run off and flame me with YOUR PARTICULAR > exception, I didn't say there's no way to tell, ever. I take greater > issue with the "do" statement than the "can" statement. MCI, AT&T, et > al, are unlikely to know or care, unless it's some part of a pre- > existing business (usually) arrangement. I wouldn't expect them to > have any idea which calls from my home came from a modem, fax, or a > phone. I know of precisely two instances where the phone company (LEC, IXC, whoever) cares one hoot if it is a modem or a voice, and in neither case is it recorded in any way, nor is there even a mechanism to record it. Instance one is Echo Cancellors/Suppressors are disabled when a modem tone is present. Instance two is when any system that can compress the bandwidth required for a call is in use, it will be disabled for a modem. The last I knew (a couple years ago) there were NO long distance carriers using compression on domestic calls. (On many international calls you are in fact going to be compressed.) Floyd floyd@ims.alaska.edu A guest on the Institute of Marine Science computer Salcha, Alaska system at the University of Alaska at Fairbanks. ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address From: ray.normandeau@factory.com (Ray Normandeau) Date: 8 Aug 93 02:28:00 GMT Organization: Invention Factory's BBS - New York City, NY - 212-274-8298v.32bis Reply-To: ray.normandeau@factory.com (Ray Normandeau) > I decided to try the UnDirectory service mentioned by Blake Patterson > (900-933-3330). It successfully got (and pronounced) my brother's name and > address in Newton Highlands, MA. How much does the service cost? ------------------------------ From: turner@Dixie.Com Date: Sun, 8 Aug 93 11:59 EDT From: rsiatl!turner@rsiatl.UUCP Subject: Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address > number you have or address across the country. Remember, there is so > much information *publicly available* between courthouse records, library > criss cross books, post office box rental and forwarding address > records, voter registration offices, and more, that you don't have to > resort to illegal sources (for the public) such as NCIC. PAT] Pat, One day my mother mentioned to me that she had never been on a piece of timberland she owns since she bought it. Since we were passing through the county seat later that day, I asked her to stop at the courthouse for a minute. I walked up to the probate judges office and asked to use the map room. As usual they said "sure". We went into the map room, and I pulled the M-Z Alpha index (about 3" thick) and looked up my mother's name. There was only one parcel of land I didn't recognize so I recorded the map and plot number. Then on the other side of the room I pulled out the plot map and found the property. I wrote down the land description. After putting the maps back up, I went downstairs and borrowed a topo map from the SCS/ASCS people, copied it, and marked the property lines on it. Total time was about five to ten minutes. My mother was amazed. She thought I had done something illegal, and couldn't believe this was public information. Apparently a lot of people think this isn't public information. Ob Telecom tie: I got real good at this doing OSP construction, especially clearing land before plowing fiber. Telco tells you where the ROW is, but if you don't want to piss off the landowners who think they own the land you call ahead. Ten minutes of dozer work here, or a load of firewood there works wonders. Patton Turner KB4GRZ FAA Telecommunications turner@dixie.com [Moderator's Note: Your story is a good one. Yes, that's one reason that skip-tracers, private detectives, etc make such good money. They *know* about all the free, totally public information that's around and exactly where to go find it. Remember, court houses are public places as are criminal/civil trials, and by extension, all the paper- work generated as a result. Just help yourself! There are databases galore on the American public. Learn to use them. PAT] ------------------------------ From: co057@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steven H. Lichter) Subject: Re: L.A. Cellular Telephone Complaint Date: 8 Aug 1993 06:07:30 GMT Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA) I had an experence with them when I first go my phone. For some reason they wanted a huge deposit and was unable to tell me why since no credit report was ever done. I contacted PacBell Cellular and within an hour a tech from the local service company came out and programmed my phone and within 30 minutes it was working. When I replaced it with a handheld the dealer did it and again it was working within a very short time. Twice I have had to send phone in for service to them under the extended service warranty, which by the way does not cost anything as long as you keep the service for 12 months. Each time they sent a loaner out by Federal Express and it was working almost as soon as I called them as was it when I got my regular one back. Their service is very good and have not had any problems with it anywhere that I have traveled and the roaming works fine. Also they have opted to wait for the more advanced digital system where LAC has gone the other way. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Aug 93 08:30 EDT From: ndallen@io.org (Nigel Allen) Subject: Re: Handsets For the Hearing Impaired Organization: Internex Online - Toronto, Canada (416) 363-3783 In Canada, special telecommunications equipment for people with disabilities is available from the local telephone company. Bell Canada operates "Centres for People with Special Needs" in Montreal and Toronto, and other telephone companies have similarly-named offices which provide equipment to people with disabilities, and which may also arrange for other company services, such as an exemption from directory assistance charges for people who can't read the phone book. The Canadian Hearing Society also sells telecommunications devices for the deaf and other "special needs" telecom equipment. In the United States and other countries, "special needs" telecom equipment may be available from the local telephone company, charitable organizations that work with people with disabilities (the Canadian Hearing Society would be an example), mail-order companies like Hello Direct (telephone 1-800-HI-HELLO in the U.S. and Canada), and AT&T, which I think has a "special needs center" of its own. [Moderator's Note: For all their other foibles and complaints people have about them, the Bell Companies in the USA have always been very generous and imaginative at finding solutions for people with disabil- ities. Alex Bell was a teacher of deaf people, you know. PAT] ------------------------------ From: paris@merlin.dev.cdx.mot.com (Gregory M. Paris) Subject: Re: Radar Detectors (was Re: New AM Band Violates ...) Organization: Motorola Codex, Canton, Massachusetts Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 14:15:16 GMT > and CARE (Committee on American Relief in Europe). Got any other > examples of 'words' which are really acronymns instead? PAT] scuba -- self contained underwater breathing apparatus (invented by Jaques Cousteau, I believe). Greg Paris Motorola Codex, 20 Cabot Blvd C1-30, Mansfield, MA 02048-1193 [Moderator's Note: Wow! That is a new one on me! I like it. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Aug 93 09:22:00 CDT From: varney@ihlpe.att.com Subject: Re: Need Sources/Info For Cheap Voicemail Organization: AT&T Network Systems Dub Dublin,HOU281 2303,CTN-596-3199, (hwdub@chevron.com) wrote: > I need to find information about, and sources of *inexpensive* voice > mail systems. I need a fair amount of programmability (new voice > information service), so I'm assuming a PC-based system is my best > bet. If it's real cheap, .... > system soon. It's VERY important that the system be able to execute > arbitrary commands in the OS as a result of a user menu choice. If you're not tied to PC-hardware/software, Great Valley Products (GVP) offers a "PhonePak(tm)" system for any Amiga A2000/A3000 computer. Current mail order prices are $299 or less -- the A2000 is going for steep discounts in the <$1000 range with hard-drive. This is a combination voice mail system (multiple mailboxes) and fax store/print/forward/faxback system bundled with an internal script language and AREXX (Amiga REXX) interface. On lines with "transfer" capability, the system can transfer calls to other numbers based on caller input. An internal database for names, numbers and addresses is supplied, as is a scheduler for timed sending of faxes. The Amiga OS is multi-tasking, so the system can be doing other things while handling phone calls. The AREXX interface allows virtually any program to be run (and controlled) from the PhonePak software. If nothing else, this would make a cheap development/test machine; such applications are not always easy to debug ... GVP can be reached on (215) 337-8770 (FAX on 215-337-9922). Al Varney - just my opinion ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Aug 93 11:58 EDT From: rsiatl!turner@rsiatl.UUCP Subject: Re: Area 205 to Split Carl Moore writes: > I don't have this in front of me: is there a 205-334 exchange > anywhere? Are there any local calls across the future 205/334 > boundary? Sorry I took so long to respond. 334 acording to some SCB info I got a while back is actually in Georgetown, GA, a small town just across the river from Eufaula, AL. It looks like the split was made along LATA lines. I haven't been back to AL since the split was announced, so I'm not sure. As the LATA lines pass just south of my hometown, Alexander City, and north of Auburn University, I'll see about local calls on the east side of the state as soon as I see the maps. I think some Alltel area will be cut in half regardless due to their large north-south range. (Camp Hill to south of Ecletic for anyone familiar with that area.) There are some real crappy interconnects in Alabama, I feel sorry for their customers when they fail to update ARS tables. Patton Turner KB4GRZ FAA Telecommunications turner@dixie.com ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #553 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa02434; 8 Aug 93 21:10 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA16574 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Sun, 8 Aug 1993 16:13:43 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA31850 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Sun, 8 Aug 1993 16:13:14 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 16:13:14 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308082113.AA31850@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@delta.eecs.nwu.edu Subject: Would YOU Use a 'Voicemail Edition' of the Digest? Dear Readers, An opportunity has presented itself which seems to have some good merit to it, and I toss the idea out for quick yes/no/maybe answers to see if any interest is present. This will be a multi-line 'voice BBS' service for TELECOM Digest and comp.dcom.telecom participants. Best of all, it will mostly be FREE to participate in the message bases, etc. Private voicemail boxes will be available to friends of the Digest who have donated any amount of money at any time in the past or who have purchased services from the Digest. But *anyone* will otherwise be free to post messages in their own voice and listen to the replies from others. There will probably be three message bases: One : General telecom related comments and questions Two : Technical comments and questions Three: Conference/Seminar announcements; job postings; misc. Messages can be up to a minute in length; replies can be up to the same length. Participants can include their own name/address/phone in the messages or refer others to a voicemail box. Commercial messages for products and services can go in the third category above for some negotiable fee. Users with voicemail boxes will be able to use them for whatever purpose they wish, and all voicemail stuff will be *private and unmoderated* ... the public areas will be 'moderated' in the same way the Digest is now ... loosely, but with a goal toward keeping things running smoothly. Another category will be a series of helpful tutorial messages; a sort of FAQ which I hope volunteers will agree to fill for me. Naturally, you get to listen to comments about the Orange Card and Telepassport while in the announcement area! ... It might well be up and running in the next day or two, so I would like *quick* answers from readers, directed to my personal email address: ptownson@eecs.nwu.edu REMEMBER: If you have already assisted financially with the Digest or purchased any affinity services, you are *already entitled* to a free confidential voicemail box if you want one (provided this service does start). The message bases would be intended as a fast, quick turnaround for telecom related comments and questions. Your messages would stay 'on line' until the stacks filled up, then the oldest messages would be deleted automatically. Depending on usage, that could be anywhere between several days and three or four weeks. Please let me know when you read this, with the understanding there is no obligation whatsoever. If your company would be interested in having a slot for commercial messages, please contact me also. Thanks, Patrick Townson TELECOM Moderator   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa02606; 8 Aug 93 21:16 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA03393 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Sun, 8 Aug 1993 17:17:55 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA15002 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Sun, 8 Aug 1993 17:17:22 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 17:17:22 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308082217.AA15002@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #554 TELECOM Digest Sun, 8 Aug 93 17:17:20 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 554 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Lynx ExtraLine Voice/FAX/Modem Switch (Steve Diamond) Re: What is Category 5? (Patton Turner) Re: Movie: In the Line of Fire (Richard Osterberg) Re: Looking For Information and Experience With LCI (henryc@oar.net) Re: Is Fiber Coming to New Jersey? (shag@gnu.ai.mit.edu) Re: Area-Code Splits and State Capitols (Ken Rossen) Re: Valid Card Declared Invalid? (Brett Frankenberger) Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address (Elana Beach) Re: T1, Internet Access (Garrett Wollman) Re: Local Calls via LD Carrier (A.T. Furman) Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal (William J. Carpenter) ---------------------- TELECOM Digest is an e-journal devoted mostly -- but not exclusively -- to discussions on voice telephony. The Digest is a not-for-profit public service published frequently by Patrick Townson Associates. PTA markets a no-surcharge telephone calling card and a no monthly fee 800 service. In addition, we are resellers of AT&T's Software Defined Network. For a detailed discussion of our services, write and ask for the file 'products'. The Digest is delivered at no charge by email to qualified subscribers on any electronic mail service connected to the Internet. To join the mail- ing list, write and tell us how you qualify: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu. All article submissions MUST be sent to our email address: telecom@eecs. nwu.edu -- NOT as replies to comp.dcom.telecom. Back issues and numerous other telephone-related files of interest are available from the Telecom Archives, using anonymous ftp lcs.mit.edu. Login anonymous, then 'cd telecom-archives'. At the present time, the Digest is also ported to Usenet at the request of many readers there, where it is known as 'comp.dcom.telecom'. Use of the Digest does not require the use of our products and services. The two are separate. All articles are the responsibility of the individual authors. Organi- zations listed, if any, are for identification purposes only. The Digest is compilation-copyrighted, 1993. **DO NOT** cross-post articles between the Digest and other Usenet or alt newsgroups. Do not compile mailing lists from the net-addresses appearing herein. Send tithes and love offerings to PO Box 1570, Chicago, IL 60690. :) Phone: 312-465-2700. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 8 Aug 93 10:26:19 -0700 From: diamond@netcom.com (diamond) Subject: Lynx ExtraLine Voice/FAX/Modem Switch I've experienced an odd problem testing the Lynx ExtraLine Voice/FAX/Modem switch for which I'd appreciate some comp.dcom.telecom expertise. I'm attempting to use it to switch incoming calls between a modem and a FAX machine. What I liked about the Lynx was that it doesn't require any special modem setup or the FAX operator to enter any touch-tones, it's completely transparent. The ExtraLine is supposed to work like this in the modem/FAX mode: it routes incoming calls to the modem port, and if the modem answers and connects, the Extraline is done. If the modem doesn't answer or it times out (in 15 seconds with ATS7=15) because the call is a FAX call, the ExtraLine generates a simulated ringing signal to the FAX and then switches the call to the FAX port. My problem appeared in testing. If I call from my second line, the modem answers but the ExtraLine immediately switches to the FAX anyway before I even get answer tone from the modem. If I call from a cellphone however, everything works fine. Is there something different about a call originating from the same central office as the answering phone that would cause the answering line to see a call differently and thus somehow confuse the ExtraLine? And if so, is there a solution other than not being able to handle modem calls from within ones own central office? I tried unsuccessfully to explain this problem to the Lynx people, who of course found everything working fine when they called the modem/FAX line. I'd appreciate any suggestions! Steve Diamond diamond@netcom.com ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Aug 93 11:59 EDT From: rsiatl!turner@rsiatl.UUCP Subject: Re: What is Category 5 (re: ISDN) Harold Hallikainen writes: > Can anyone give a BRIEF description of the electrical coding > scheme on all these high speed twisted pair systems (such as ISDN)? I > haven't taken the time to research it at all. How many bits per baud > are being run? Is it a multi-level coding system or just two or three BRI ISDN uses 2B1Q line coding for the outside plant. Two bits per baud, with voltages of +-2.5 and +-.83 volts. PRI ISDN uses T1 like coding ( AMI or B8ZS) with P-P voltages of up to 6 volts. ISDN S interface (the inside wiring) uses 1 bit/baud, psuedoternary line codes, and +-.75V. > Do such systems treat the twisted pair as a transmission line, > matching the characteristic impedance to prevent reflections? Do they > work full duplex using some sort of hybrid, or just go real fast half > duplex? Can we use these techniques over leased lines ordered from Yes, most twisted pair transceivers use 100 or 130 ohms. The former seems to be the T1 standard. ISDN multidrop segments (S interface) use a terminating resistor. Everything else I am familiar with uses point to point links with the termination in the receiver. All of the American stuff I know of uses full duplex except for some ADSL and similar loops in very limited use, especially for anything faster than a DSO with secondary channel. Some other countries use a pingpong method to deliver ISDN. This decision was made before 2B1Q chips were available. Notice I left out 10BASET? I'll leave the LAN stuff to those more knowledgeable. Everything I mentioned was <= 1.544 mbps, and very compatible with PIC/old UTP cable. Patton Turner KB4GRZ FAA Telecommunications turner@dixie.com ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Movie: In the Line of Fire From: osterber@husc8.harvard.edu (Richard Osterberg) Date: 8 Aug 93 16:49:35 GMT > It wouldn't suprise me if certain government agencies had > already made agreements with various carriers to make certain > information availible; if one could get real-time access to switches, > a smart "joker" could probably get through 1-900-STOPPR rather easily. My guess is that when you're protecting the life of the president, *never* underestimate the power of government agencies. Rick Osterberg osterber@husc.harvard.edu 617-527-6664 617-965-0370 ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 14:06:23 -0400 From: henryc@oar.net Subject: Re: Looking For Information and Experience With LCI In article TELECOM Moderator mistakenly notes: > [Moderator's Note: LCI is the fourth largest long distance carrier in > the USA, coming behind only AT&T, MCI and Sprint in that order. Their > corporate offices are in Virginia. They are also the carrier handling > calls for the Orange Card, the affinity calling card program offered > to readers of this newsgroup and Digest. Their service is good. PAT] Ummm, LCI, formerly LiTel, is based in here in Columbus (OH). henry [Moderator's Note: When I talk to some of their people, they are always in an office in Virginia somewhere. Do they have a facility there as well? PAT] ------------------------------ From: birchall@pilot.njin.net (Shag) Subject: Re: Is Fiber Coming to New Jersey? Date: 8 Aug 93 18:22:55 GMT Organization: Screaming in Digital, the Queensryche Digest SKASS@DREW.DREW.EDU writes: > I have heard rumors in the neighborhood that my town, Madison, NJ, > along with neighboring Chatham and Florham Park, will be equipped with > a fiber optic telephone network, as a demonstration site, by the end > of 1994. Can anyone verify this, give details (fiber right to my > network interface?), or tell me what this will mean for me? First, to answer your subject line -- fiber's already here. NJ Bell has been targeting corporate, government, and institutional customers so far, and has gotten quite a bit installed. In aerial installation, look for thin black cables, with orange sleeves around them at the poles. Easy to spot. :) As for the demo towns -- I believe they're planning to fiber-ize two towns as demonstrations, one up your way and one down along the shore -- Ocean County, I think. This should mean ISDN for all the residential customers in those towns. I don't know if they'll be doing this for free, but I suspect they'll be nice about it, otherwise people would put up a fight. As for people elsewhere in the state, a friend of mine tells me that one _can_ now get residential ISDN in New Jersey, but that the first ISDN customer in the exchange foots the cost ($1800) of getting the ISDN card put into the ESS5 ... Shag shag@gnu.ai.mit.edu - birchall@pilot.njin.net - shag@glia.biostr.washington.edu PPI 14.4 FXSA - ShagNet, Burlington County NJ - GeoWorks Ensemble 2.0 GeoSadist ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Aug 93 14:20:40 EDT From: Ken Rossen Subject: Re: Area-Code Splits and State Capitols > Rhode Island is approximately 35 x 45 miles. I forgot to mention, > Acquidneck Island (Which is Newport and Jamestown) can't call BEYOND > the island without incurring a toll. Small correction: Aquidneck Island (which was at times called "Rhode Island" and which gave the state its name) has the towns Portsmouth, Middletown, and Newport on it -- but NOT Jamestown, which is by itself on the adjacent Conanicut Island, connected to Aquidneck by one bridge and to the Western bay shore by another. One hopes that Jamestown callers are not charged nonlocal rates for all off-island calls! KENR@SHL.COM ------------------------------ From: brettf@netcom.com (Brett Frankenberger) Subject: Re: Valid Card Declared Invalid? Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 19:30:57 GMT brettf@netcom.com (Brett Frankenberger) writes: > Stuff going through 10xxx is not verified by the local telco (Once you > get the MCI bong, it's MCI's call). Some LD companies, for whatever > reason, elect to only accept LEC cards on their 10XXX access. But > it't strictly up to them. I believe AT&T will accept its card or an > LEC card on their 10288. > > [Moderator's Note: Oh? Stuff going through 10xxx is not validated by > the local telco? Then how come when I wanted to change the PIN on my > AT&T Calling Card and had to ask twice to get it done, the second time > the rep at AT&T said "I will send a FAX to Illinois Bell right now and > ask what is the delay in processing this," ?? And how come she later > said IBT had lost the original order to do it? I believe that anything > dialed via 10xxx is first examined -- in its entirety -- by the local > telco, and then is handled, passed to a carrier, treated or whatever. > How come whenever I want to change calling plans or do anything with > my AT&T account the answer is always it will be done whenever Illinois > Bell gets around to it, etc.? PAT] My statement was open to mis-interpretation. First, I was referring only to 10XXX-0- ... (but I think you know that). What I should have said is that the validation is the responsibility of the IXC ... that is, the IXC gives the bong, uses it's DTMF receivers to capture what you dial, and then makes its own decision on whether or not to accept the call. It could decide to pass them all, reject them all, look in its own database, or whatever. Apparently in the case of AT&T, it looks in the database of LEC issued cards, which AT&T does not have access to change. AT&T could, if it wanted, check the LEC database, and if there was no match, then check its own database for AT&T issued cards. For whatever reason, AT&T has decided not to do this. If it isn't in the LEC database, they don't accept it, but it's the IXC that does the rejection (although said rejection may be made based on information received from an LEC maintained database). If you don't key in a number after the bong, you will be connected to an IXC operator, not an LEC operator. Brett (brettf@netcom.com) (formerly rfranken@cs.umr.edu) ------------------------------ From: elana@netcom.com (Elana Beach) Subject: Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 19:35:38 GMT > [Moderator's Note: Your story is a good one. Yes, that's one reason > that skip-tracers, private detectives, etc make such good money. They > *know* about all the free, totally public information that's around > and exactly where to go find it. Remember, court houses are public > places as are criminal/civil trials, and by extension, all the paper- > work generated as a result. Just help yourself! There are databases > galore on the American public. Learn to use them. PAT] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Great! But HOW? Where does one start to find out all the ways of becoming a do-it-yourself private investigator? What books to buy or what net.sources should I know about? ObTelecom: My Caller-ID box from US West does not yet identify callers from out of the US West territory, expecially long-distance. Anyone have any idea when this will change?? Elana [Moderator's Note: Well, there is a company called 'Computer Detective' which sells passwords to their system ... not inexpensively, I might add. Its something like $750 for a password and a usage fee of some- where above $20 per hour. In return you get access to drivers' records for 49 states; the records of criminal and civil litigation in about 85 percent of the county courthouses in the USA including civil judg- ments; tax assessments cross referenced by address; who owns the parcel of land; numerous telephone directories and criss-cross directories by telephone number and address; credit bureau files from the three major bureaus; whether someone has ever been in prison or not, and what for; I think they have about 200 'cooperating databases' they scan. You call them with your modem, identify the person you are dealing with as best you can, and the databases you want searched. Depending on how wide and varied the search, and how common the name, results come back in a few seconds or several hours later. You log off in that case and they send email with the search results. They are very ethical, i.e. they require a written form saying you have 'legitimate business reasons' before they will access the credit bureaus due to federal laws about same and they don't access 'non- public' databases like NCIC. They content themselves with staying totally within the law looking at *public* information. They also do 'box inquiry' with post offices to find out who belongs to given post offices boxes and the actual street address of same. PO Box info *is* public, you know, if you know who to ask and the phrases to use when you invoke Freedom of Information. Their service is used to find deadbeat parents owing child support money; locating people who owe money in general or to whom money is owed; for finding old classmates for a reunion, whatever. They encourage people to *resell* their service as a dealer, or information provider. I think they even sell franchises under the name 'Computer Detective' complete with helpful instruction manuals. In other words, people come to you looking for someone. You charge $50 per hour, take down the details, scan the databases and go back to your client the next day with the results and tell them it took you three hours! :) I would begin one of thier franchises immediatly -- or at least obtain a pass- word and become 'Internet Detective' if I had the damn $750 to start with! I'd probably set up a server to take requests and email back the answers, etc. PAT] ------------------------------ From: wollman@trantor.emba.uvm.edu (Garrett Wollman) Subject: Re: T1, Internet Access Organization: University of Vermont, EMBA Computer Facility Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 20:57:21 GMT In article , Brad Cox wrote: > I'm responding to the group because I'm really not sure why Telnet, > Tymnet, Sprintnet and so forth isn't this fellow's answer. In three words: "Because X.25 sucks." In many cases, depending on the system vendor, it is actually cheaper to install the sort of service that other people have described, then just to buy the software to make a system speak X.25. Furthermore, the PDN's X.25 PADs are generally limited to 9600bps maximum (and that's usually at the most expensive rate), and often have difficulty dealing with modern file-transfer and communications protocols. As other people have pointed out, if you go the route of getting T1 entrance facilities and an expensive modem rack, you make it possible for people to connect to you using other mechanisms besides modem; e.g., ISDN or Switched 56, and depending on the sort of connection you buy from telco, it may provide you with useful information about your callers which could be used to provide enhanced services. Back in the 1970s, there were two, parallel lines of networking development going on. One gave us the Internet. The other gave us Triple-X (X.25, X.121, and something else). Which one would you choose, today, knowing about the relative popularity of these two technologies? Garrett A. Wollman wollman@emba.uvm.edu uvm-gen!wollman UVM disagrees. ------------------------------ From: atfurman@cup.portal.com Subject: Re: Local Calls via LD Carrier? Date: Sun, 8 Aug 93 14:38:45 PDT Thus spake our Moderator: > I think you will see in the next few years the distinction between > 'local carrier' and 'long distance company' becomes very blurred as > the LD companies begin handling more and more local service. Most of > them are happy to have calls terminated right at the subscriber's > premises now rather than paying the local telco access fees. What carries the signal over the infamous Last Mile? If the density of the alternate carrier's subscribers is far below the density of subscribers to the by-appointment-to-their-majesties-the-Public- Utilities-Commission local exchange carrier, I would expect the cost per subscriber of installing their own local loops to be vastly higher. [Moderator's Note: The carriers will either go with T-1 or a satellite dish on the roof, or similiar. If it suits them better, they will still use local telco leased lines, etc, but if they do it will be transparent to the end-user. Consider now how AT&T is glad to terminate directly for these guys who run chat services, etc. If the carrier has to pay two pennies to the LEC for termination or a penny to the end user instead, why not terminate with the end user if he has the volume of traffic to warrant it. PAT] ------------------------------ From: bill@attmail.com Date: Sun, 8 Aug 93 21:43:08 GMT Subject: Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories [[Don't be fooled by where I work. I don't know nuthin bout buzzin no busies!]] I have a recollection of reading/hearing somewhere that a lot of thought and research went into the sound they chose for the ringer on a phone. The puzzle to solve was an optimization between using a sound urgent enough to make you want to answer pronto and not using a sound so annoying that you wouldn't want a phone. (My scrambled recollection of this may be confusing the original bells with today's popular electronic warblers.) It wouldn't surprise me to hear that the busy signal was chosen in a similar way. After all, since the billing model is that you don't pay for busy calls in the US, the phone company wants you to give up as soon as you know it's a busy. Bill@attmail.com billc@pegasus.ATT.COM or +1 908 576 2932, Fax x6406 William_J_Carpenter@ATT.COM AT&T Bell Labs / AT&T EasyLink Services LZ 3C-207 ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #554 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa16754; 9 Aug 93 6:25 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA12564 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Mon, 9 Aug 1993 03:59:54 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA32173 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Mon, 9 Aug 1993 03:59:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 03:59:16 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308090859.AA32173@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #555 TELECOM Digest Mon, 9 Aug 93 03:59:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 555 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Fire in Australian Telephone Exchange (David E A Wilson) FTP Sites Wanted for IEEE, CCITT etc Docs (Ross Douglas Alexander) People, Not Profits (A.T. Furman) Internet to Commerical E-Mail (Van H. Schallenberg) History of AT&T, The Day Dr. Bell Was Buried (Craig Myers) Another Look At Alex Bell (was Re: Hearing Impaired) (Kai Schlichting) LORAN -- LOng Range Aid to Navigation (Bert Roseberry) Radar and Acronyms (Cliff Sharp) Status of Cellular Data (Peter Lucas) Dial N'CERF (Gary Edwards) Pager Followup (Dan Reiner) Re: How to Change Pager Alert Sound? (Jacob DeGlopper) Re: Caller-ID Software Wanted (Dan Lawrence) Re: Borneo Malaysia Phones (John Gottschalk) Please Recommend a BRI ISDN Box (Carl Oppedahl) Re: T1, Internet Access (Brad Cox) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: david@cs.uow.edu.au (David E A Wilson) Subject: Fire in Australian Telephone Exchange Date: 9 Aug 1993 12:29:03 +1000 Organization: University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia. Last week the TV news reported a fire in the Kiama telephone exchange. It said that approximatly 20% of trunks were damaged (I think -- this is from memory) and a number of special services (ATMs and railway ticket machines) were out as well. The next day the local newspaper had the following (small) article: "Telecom fire linked to railway A recently installed railway automatic ticket machine may have caused a $300,000 fire in the Kiama Telecom building. Police said the fire caused extensive internal damage to the Manning St. building. State Rail employees noticed sparks coming from the ticket machine at Kiama station." Note that I have not yet seen any confirmation that the ticket machine was the cause. The fire brigade had to break into the building to put the fire out. David Wilson +61 42 213802 voice, +61 42 213262 fax Dept Comp Sci, Uni of Wollongong david@cs.uow.edu.au ------------------------------ From: rale1@cs.aukuni.ac.nz (Ross Douglas Alexander) Subject: FTP Sites Wanted For IEEE, CCITT etc Docs Organization: Computer Science Dept. University of Auckland Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 22:48:36 GMT I'm after networking documents for (specifically IEEE 802.6, SMDS) computer and telephony networks. The documents I am interested in a sort of the following IETF - I know these ones IEEE - ???.ieee.org CCITT - Bellcore - AT&T - ISO - Many thanks, Ross Alexander Computer Science Auckland University ------------------------------ From: atfurman@cup.portal.com Subject: People, Not Profits Date: Sun, 8 Aug 93 19:24:22 PDT No sooner had I submitted my response to the following example of capitalist-bashing: > CLOSING THE "VALUES-GAP": NREN Takeover Moves Ahead Unopposed > By Vigdor Schreibman > ...These > measures would authorize a takeover of the NREN by private industry to > serve its own interests guided by the morality of the market place and > the ethic of profit maximization... Than I found the following, in the Usenet newsgroup alt.internet.access. wanted, in an unrelated posting by Simon Poole (Zurich, CH), who is involved with Internet operations in Europe: >> considering that email service can be gotten from private >> corporations in North America for anywhere from $10-$30/month. > You forget that infrastructure costs are about one order of > magnitude higher in Western European countries than in the > states (a 64K leased line will roughly set us back the same ammount > a T1 link would in the states)... Permit me to summarize. Western Europeans may pay far more for communications bandwidth provided by their State-owned monopolies, but they are at least protected from the horror of "private industry" allowed to "serve its own interest." Therefore, we should keep data networking under the control of the folks who brought you the Clipper Chip. People, not profits. While privatization programs pick up momentum in Russia, Hungary, and Czechslovakia, and the Prime Minister of Poland puts her political career on the line to get a key privatization bill through Parliament, we in the USA are treated to Vigdor Schreibman. > guided by the morality of the market place and the ethic of profit > maximization. To speak of "morality of the market place" and "ethic of profit maximization," that is, to *qualify* the terms "morality" and "ethic" to serve notice that they are not being used in the same sense that decent, right-thinking people use them, is to presuppose that business is, in some sense, basically immoral. It is to imply that business- people should be presumed guilty. Better, instead, we should leave it all to the folks who brought you the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms? Bibliography: _The Road to Serfdom_ by Friedrich A. v. Hayek > Federal Information News Syndicate, Vigdor Schreibman, Editor & Publisher, > 18 - 9th Street NE #206, Washington, DC 20002-6042. Copyright 1993 FINS. Copyright? Imagine my surprise. Mr Schreibman couldn't POSSIBLY be serving his own interests here, could he? ------------------------------ From: u951007@unx.ucc.okstate.edu (u951007) Subject: Internet to Commerical E-Mail Organization: Oklahoma State University Computer Center, Stillwater OK Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 03:13:50 GMT Has anyone ever developed a list of the formats necessary to send internet electronic mail to commercial electronic mail services? If not, I would be interested in preparing such a list. The list should include only commercial electronic mail services, both in the United States and in other countries. Such a list would facilitate converting from the normal address for a user on the service to the internet format. For example, I have compiled the following listing: SERVICE FORMAT REMARKS AT&T MAIL xxxxxxx@attmail.com where xxxxxxx is service username EASYLINK nnnnnnnn@eln.attmail.com where nnnnnnnn is user number COMPUSERVE nnnnn.nnnn@compuserve.com where nnnnn.nnnn is user number with comma changed to a period MCI MAIL 000nnnnnnn@mcimail.com where nnnnnnn is user number If others would e-mail the internet format for other commercial services I would compile and post. Thanks, Van H. Schallenberg schallenberg@attmail.com u951007@unx.ucc.okstate.edu [Moderator's Note: There have been some of these tables written up before and in fact we have one in the archives at present although it is a couple years old. PAT] ------------------------------ From: craig@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu (Craig Myers) Subject: History of AT&T, The Day Dr. Bell Was Buried Organization: JHU/Applied Physics Laboratory Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 02:47:15 GMT This is a little late... > From the "Events in Telecommunications History" August 4, 1922 "Telephone service was suspended for one minute, just before sunset (6:25 to 6:26 PM) on the entire telephone system of the United States and Canada during the funeral service for Dr. Bell." [Moderator's Note: This is correct. Although in his later years Alex Bell had nothing to do with the Bell System (he really was not even active much after the first couple years of the company), he remained a major stockholder in AT&T as did his wife Mable. When he died about the first of August 71 years ago, Mable called the executives of the company to tell them of his passing and they agreed to that minute of silence as a tribute. It took a couple days to get the message out to the far flung branches of the company. There was not total silence since some independent telcos became silent in sympathy with AT&T but others did not. Numerous executives of the company attended the funeral service that August evening, even though a lot of them hated Alex Bell as much as he hated them when he was alive. Some people in the company liked him a lot though, and remembered the personal generosity of Mable and Alex several years earlier at the time of the ugly incident at the Western Electric Hawthorne Works employees picnic in Chicago when the boat on which the employees were cruising sank in the Chicago River at Dearborn Street, drowning some 812 persons who were trapped under the overturned boat. As a shocked Bell System grieved over the death of several hundred co-workers and members of their families at the annual company picnic and awards ceremony which had turned into a hideous nightmare, Alex and Mable came to Chicago to personally visit the survivors and to make personal gifts to the families of those who were killed in the disaster to (as Mable put it) 'help tide them over as they try to begin their lives again ...' When they visited Hawthorne Works three days after the incident, they sat with employees in work-rooms at which half the working places were empty -- co-workers who had lost their lives the Sunday afternoon before -- and Mable took copious notes of the names of those no longer living; their families received personal notes and gifts from Alex and Mable a few days later. Not everyone though agrees that Alex Bell was such a good guy. The next message in this issue tells a different version of things. PAT] ------------------------------ From: acorn@info2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (Kai Schlichting) Subject: Another Look at Alex Bell (was Re: Handsets ... Hearing Impaired) Date: 8 Aug 1993 23:31:15 GMT Organization: Newsserver, Comp.Center (RUS), U of Stuttgart, FRG > [Moderator's Note: For all their other foibles and complaints people > have about them, the Bell Companies in the USA have always been very > generous and imaginative at finding solutions for people with disabil- > ities. Alex Bell was a teacher of deaf people, you know. PAT] Some more information on Alex Bell: he had a deaf wife, but was not in favour of the deaf community at all. In fact, he wanted to destroy sign language, the only common denominator and centerpoint of culture deaf people have, by forcing and promoting deaf people (including his wife) to learn lipreading and have them go to oral school. If I am right, he even promoted laws that would forbid deaf people to marry (if both were deaf), to reduce the number of deaf people over all. (Sidenote: This is nonsense of course; there are more than 150 common causes for deafness, and only part of these are genetic reasons.) Alex Bell was not a teacher for the deaf, he was the centerforce of mainstreaming the deaf and destroying their unique culture, to clear up with a myth, if it ever was one. To the deaf, he was the ultimate person of intolerance and oppression. Bye, Kai (Hearing, but a proud husband of a deaf wife.) [Moderator's Note: Thank you very much for a challenging response on this 71st anniversary of Bell's death. Are there rebuttals to Kai's comments or validating remarks by other readers? Again, thanks. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1993 22:08:17 EDT From: Bert Roseberry Subject: LORAN -- LOng Range Aid to Navigation Organization: Digital Equipment Computer Users Society Pat, LORAN stands for LOng Range Aid to Navigation. LORAN is one of the Coast Guard's responsibilities. Although now most LORAN sites are becoming automated, the biggest threat for Coast Guard people for many years was sending someone to isolated duty on a LORAN station in the middle of no where. Back several years ago when President Reagan bombed Omar Quedaffi he fought back by trying to bomb the LORAN Station on Lampadusa, a small island off of Italy. The bomb fell short. So much for trivia. Bert Roseberry roseberry@eisner.decus.org or US Coast Guard bert@mailstorm.dot.gov ------------------------------ Subject: Radar and Acronyms Date: Sun, 8 Aug 93 18:01:53 CDT From: Cliff Sharp >> RADAR = RAdio Direction And Rangefinding > [Moderator's Note: While you're at it then, how about SONAR and LORAN > and ELF? 'Radar' is one of those acronymns which has turned into a > word on its own ... much like NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) > and CARE (Committee on American Relief in Europe). Got any other > examples of 'words' which are really acronymns instead? PAT] SONAR - SOund Navigation And Ranging LORAN - LOng RAnge Navigation ELF - Extremely Low Frequency (which is among the hierarchy: ELF - Extremely Low Frequency below 10 KHz VLF - Very Low Frequency 10 - 30 KHz LF - Low Frequency 30 - 300 KHz MF - Medium Frequency 300 KHz - 3 MHz HF - High Frequency 3 - 30 MHz VHF - Very High Frequency 30 - 300 MHz UHF - Ultra High Frequency 300 MHz - 3 GHz SHF - Super High Frequency 3 - 30 GHz EHF - Extremely High Frequency 30 -300 GHz ) Other acronyms: LASER - Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation MASER - Microwave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation (coherent microwave beams, just as lasers give coherent light) TASER - (before anyone asks) I think this is a made-up Trademark, but maybe it should be Telescoping Anti-personnel Shocker Emasculated by Rodney King :-) SEATO - SouthEast Atlantic Treaty Organization TANSTAAFL - There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch MAD - Mutual Assured Destruction (very apropos!) JEEP = G.P. - General Purpose vehicle WAC, WAVE, etc. SHAEF, COMSEC, CINCPAC, probably a zillion other military ones FUBAR SCSI (scuzzy) - Small Computer Systems Interface LATA - Lousy A**h*les Treating you Arrogantly :-) BELLCORE - BELL COmmunications REsearch UART - Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter MODEM - MOdulator/DEModulator CODEC - COder/DECoder VOCODER - VOice enCODER RAID - Redundant Array of Independent Disks Off the top of my head (that's all the barber could fit :-)... [Moderator's Note: The only one I will dispute with you is SEATO. The /A/ stands for 'Asia' -- not 'Atlantic'. PAT] ------------------------------ From: Peter Lucas Subject: Status of Cellular Data Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 22:23:47 -0400 Organization: Sponsored acct, H&SS Dean's Office, Carnegie Mellon, Pitts, PA Can anyone post an update on what's going on in the world of cellular data? I used to assume that wireless data connectivity would evolve out of alphanumeric pager service, but I gather that the cellular voice carriers are gearing up to soak up their spare bandwidth by providing cellular packet data. Is this right? How's it going? When can I expect to have affordable two-way email from my laptop? I know about Embarc et al, but it is SOOOO expensive. It currently appears to be far cheaper per byte to use a cellular phone and modem than to use the alpha-pager services and that seems crazy. Anybody know what's coming down in this area? ------------------------------ Subject: Dial N'CERF From: uttsbbs!gary.edwards@PacBell.COM (Gary Edwards) Date: 8 Aug 93 21:01:00 GMT Organization: The Transfer Station BBS, Danville, CA - 510-837-4610/837-5591 Reply-To: uttsbbs!gary.edwards@PacBell.COM (Gary Edwards) A friend living in Sacramento mentioned he was interested in Dial N'CERF. Does anyone have any information regarding this that they can share? Supposedly, my friend believes this Dial N'CERF to be "THE HOT SETUP!" The Transfer Station BBS (510) 837-4610 & 837-5591 (V.32bis both lines) Danville, California, USA. 1.5 GIG Files & FREE public Internet Access ------------------------------ From: dbr@world.std.com (Dan Reiner) Subject: Re: How To Change Pager Alert Sound? Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 00:55:22 GMT I recently asked for information on changing the alert sound of a Bravo-plus pager. This turns out to be under the control of the paging service, as I found out when I asked them a second time. The Bravo-plus is capable of at least four different sound patterns, depending on what is transmitted to it. Thanks to all who replied. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 23:26:19 -0400 From: Jacob DeGlopper Subject: Re: How to Change Pager Alert Sound? Dan Reiner writes: > My Motorola Bravo-plus pager signals an incoming page with a loud, > annoying "short-long, short-long" beep. Other same-make/model pagers, > I own my pager. Can I change its beep style by moving a jumper or > something like that? Or is this in firmware? The paging service If you look at the bottom of your pager, inside the battery compartment there are three gold contacts. All pager options are programmed via these contacts, so you need to find someone with a Bravo Plus programmer. I'm surprised your pager company wouldn't do it for you -- that should be part of the service. You either need to find a different paging compnay or a Motorola dealer with the right programmer. You can not only change the beep cadence, but also add features such as a priority alert that will make the pager beep even in silent mode for certain phone numbers. Jacob DeGlopper, EMT-A, Wheaton (MD) Volunteer Rescue Squad Case Western Reserve University - jrd5@po.cwru.edu LAN Administration, The Orkand Corporation ------------------------------ From: dan@halcyon.halcyon.com (Dan Lawrence) Subject: Re: Caller-ID Software Wanted Date: 8 Aug 1993 17:30:11 -0700 Organization: "A World of Information at your Fingertips" In article taylor@perlis.mcs.gvsu.edu (Steve Taylor) writes: > I am interested in computer software that displays incoming telephone > numbers on my computer screen. Caller-ID was just introduced in my > area and I'm interested in a package to utilize it. I am also looking for some CID software. I have a Supra fax modem and PC clone computer. We just got CID in the 206 area (US west) and I would like to have some software. Ideally it should log all calls, Display incoming number and name in BIG letters on the screen. It would be even better if it would announce the calling number over a sound card (I have a sound blaster). It would be nice if you could substitute a custom sound file for particular numbers so it might say "Dan's Calling!" instead of a number. I am about ready to write it myself but it would be nice to see what other peoples software does. ------------------------------ From: john@citr.uq.oz.au (John Gottschalk) Subject: Re: Borneo Malaysia Phones Organization: Prentice Centre, University of Queensland Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 03:10:41 GMT JVE%FNAHA@TRENGA.UniGate1.Unisys.COM writes: >>> Smartfon is a 100m range cordless phone, which you use near to a >>> posted transmitter. It's smaller than a cellular phone, which I think >>> may also be available. >> If this is the same as the System used in Singapore, then you can >> make only outgoing calls. All over Singapore are the little signs >> >> Very interesting concept -- I had not heard it being used anywhere else. > These CT2 phones are used quite widely around the world, only the > service name varies, usually it is a variation of 'Telepoint'. In > Europe I know that at least England, France and Finland have telepoint > services. In Australia the service offered by Telstra (AKA Telecom Australia) is called Talkabout. It allows incoming as well as outgoing calls. When the user of the cordless phone is not near a basestation the calls are recorded using voicemail, and when the user registers with a base station the recorded phone calls are played to them. While they are registered they can send and recieve phone calls. People can also buy (rent?) a base station for the home, and it can be used in offices. I hear that the cordless PABX technology is similar to the Talkabout technology. Regards, John Gottschalk, john@citr.uq.oz.au Project Manager, CiTR, +61 7 365 4321 (phone) The University of Queensland, 4072, +61 7 365 4399 (fax) Brisbane, Queensland, Australia ------------------------------ From: oppedahl@panix.com (Carl Oppedahl) Subject: Please Recommend a BRI ISDN Box Date: 8 Aug 1993 22:50:20 -0400 Organization: Oppedahl & Larson I am thinking of signing up with Basic Rate Interface ISDN from Nynex. To do so I need an interface box that connects with the two-wire BRI ISDN signal and provides "dial tones" and RS-232 connections. Can some kind soul recommend makes of BRI boxes, and suppliers? Thanks, Carl Oppedahl AA2KW (patent lawyer) 1992 Commerce Street #309 Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-4412 voice 212-777-1330 ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1993 23:37:32 -0500 From: bcox@gmu.edu (Brad Cox @ GMU/PSOL) Subject: Re: T1, Internet Access wollman@trantor.emba.uvm.edu (Garrett Wollman) wrote: > In three words: "Because X.25 sucks." > Back in the 1970s, there were two, parallel lines of networking > development going on. One gave us the Internet. The other gave us > Triple-X (X.25, X.121, and something else). Which one would you > choose, today, knowing about the relative popularity of these two > technologies? But I don't 'know' their relative popularity. It varies according to whose propaganda I read. I know internet is popular in universities, but America Online, GEnie, and Compuserve (and others) use X.25. Compuserve and Prodigy's propaganda makes them loom very large. I have no way of knowing for sure. Incidentally, they don't "have difficulty dealing with modern file-transfer and communications protocols" assuming you mean zmodem which I use routinely without difficulty. They do seem to be restricted to 2400 baud, but AOL keeps promising 9600 baud RSN. If anyone has recent information re: number of subscribers for all infoage services I'd be deeply grateful. I need it for a new book, "Taming the Electronic Frontier". Brad Cox; bcox@gmu.edu; 703 968 8229 Voice 703 968 8798 Fax George Mason Program on Social and Organizational Learning ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #555 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa16525; 10 Aug 93 2:21 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA23385 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Tue, 10 Aug 1993 00:03:56 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA30727 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Tue, 10 Aug 1993 00:03:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 00:03:21 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308100503.AA30727@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #556 TELECOM Digest Tue, 10 Aug 93 00:03:15 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 556 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Sprint Workers Fed Up, Start Unionizing (Nigel Allen) MCI PC Connect Plan (Eight Cents/Min Evening/Night/Weekend) (B.J. Guillot) Ringmate/CNID on Panasonic EMSS (Monty Solomon) Need Programming Information: Mitsubishi 1500 Cell Phone (Jim Miller) Hotel Rip-Off - is This a Record? (John Slater) Cell Phone Fraud and New Systems (Jon Allen) Information Request on PCN/PCS (Hans Kruse) Competition at the LEC Level (R. Shin) New Telecom Products in Sharper Image (Christopher Zguris) Re: Another Look at Alex Bell (Frank E. Carey) Re: Another Look at Alex Bell (Joel Upchurch) Re: Administrivia: Looking at the Week Ahead of Us (Michael Covington) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: ndallen@io.org (Nigel Allen) Subject: Sprint Workers Fed Up, Start Unionizing Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 20:00:00 -0400 (EDT) Organization: Echo Beach, Toronto New Liberation News Service posted the following story to misc.activism.progressive. I should mention that I've never worked for Sprint, and that I therefore have no first-hand information about the company. Perhaps someone from Sprint might care to comment on the information in the NLNS story. Sprint Workers Fed Up, Start Unionizing by Linda Greene, NLNS (NLNS)--Working at Sprint leaves a lot to be desired besides decent pay. Sprint requires its telemarketers, mostly women, to stay on the phone for precisely 6.7 hours a day and talk with each customer for exactly 150-210 seconds. A telemarketer has 10 seconds -- no more, no less -- between calls and must make a sale every 3.5 minutes. Mostly women also, operators and service representatives at Sprint make $6,000-7,000 less a year than others in the telephone industry, which is largely unionized. The work schedules of Sprint operators change completely every week. Ever try making a long-term child care arrangement with a work schedule like that? If a worker arrives a few minutes late or leaves a few minutes early six times in a year, she or he is fired. Flexibility for emergencies or child care problems? Not at Sprint. Supervisors eavesdrop electronically on Sprint workers and impose unrealistically high work standards and constant work speed-ups, causing employee burnout and high turnover. Each year, 25% of Sprint operators quit their jobs. Sex discrimination at Sprint? You bet. The wage gap between jobs that mainly men vs. mainly women hold at Sprint is 25% greater than at AT&T and the Bell companies. Sprint operators make $6,160 less a year than their unionized counterparts at AT&T. Customer service representatives make $9,235 less; technicians, $3,445 less. In '91, William T. Esrey, chair and CEO of Sprint, made $2.4 million, almost 100 times the average pay of his nonmanagement employees. Sprint is the third-largest long distance phone company in the U.S., with 10% of the market and revenues in the billions of dollars. It employs over 16,000 people and owns local telephone companies in 18 states, for a total of 29,000 employees, nearly half of whom belong to unions. Having merged recently with Centel, Sprint now owns cellular operations in 19 states, for another 1,080 employees, and also owns long distance services in 199 countries besides the U.S. That doesn't count its special data transmission and video teleconferencing services, marketed in over 100 countries. It's no wonder Sprint workers are ready to organize. Sprint management, however, isn't cooperating. Rather, it has a formal policy of busting unionizing activity and squelching free speech. For instance, all Sprint supervisors receive a manual on "union-free management," and the company holds meetings at which attendance is mandatory and only antiunion workers can speak. Sprint has even been known to prevent the posting and distribution of union leaflets in public areas outside the company's buildings. This year Sprint made the Coalition of Labor Union Women's "Hit List" of the nation's most sexist people and corporations, "for waging an anti-union campaign in the face of the organizing efforts of its mostly female workforce ..." Recently Sprint workers successfully forced the company to alter its policy on how workers should handle obscene phone calls. Other phone companies and police departments recommend hanging up immediately, but not Sprint management: it required operators to warn the caller twice -- and then thank him for using Sprint before hanging up! In March, Sprint agreed to let employees refer obscene calls to a supervisor. Whether or not you're a Sprint customer, you can support Sprint workers' efforts to unionize by joining Friends of Sprint Workers, Communications Workers of America, 501 Third St., NW, Washington, DC 20001-2797 (phone 202-434-1182, fax 202-434-1201). (Source: CWA). ------------- The New Liberation News Service (NLNS) is a project of the non-profit Institute for Social and Cultural Change that seeks to facilitate the sharing of news, opinion, experiences, support and solidarity among progressive, grass-roots media outlets. NLNS can be reached at PO Box 325, Kendall Square Branch, Cambridge, MA 02142; (617) 492-8316; nlns@igc.apc.org. ------------- Nigel Allen, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ndallen@io.org [Moderator's Note: There was a time when AT&T used to be a bunch of nasty old devils to work for also in the company's pre-union days in the early part of this century. People like Chicagoan Myrtle Murphy, a retired (for thirty year's now! That's longer than some of you are old and longer than any of you have worked for a living) operator at IBT who was the first union steward here back in the 1930's changed that. She recalls the other operators used to laugh at her and say stuff like, 'you will never organize Bell ... no one can organize the Bell'. The supervisors told the other workers to 'stay away from Myrtle; she is a trouble-maker and she will get you in trouble with the Company too', ... but she kept getting 'the other girls' to sign union cards and come to meetings. She was an operator for forty years. I am reminded of 'Mother' Emma Jones. You recall her don't you? When a reporter for a newspaper once asked her what was her occupation, she thought about it for a second and said, "...my occupation? I'm a Hell-Raiser." So was Myrtle and many of the other operators in the 1930's despite the fact that the Great Depression was on and like all companies, Bell had a hundred women in line at the Employment Office every day of the week ready to take a job and the food off the table of someone else at a minute's notice for the princely sum of fifteen dollars per week as an operator. Of course in those days five dollars took home three large bags of groceries from the Safeway and a month's rent was $20-25 for a nice apartment. PAT] ------------------------------ From: st1r8@elroy.uh.edu (B.J. Guillot) Subject: MCI PC Connect Plan (Eight Cents/Min Evening/Night/Weekend) Date: 9 Aug 1993 08:50 CDT Organization: University of Houston Passed along FYI to the group: Press Release 07/26/93 09:00 EDT Systems Solutions, the owner and operator of The Virginia Connection bulletin board system, the Washington, DC area's premier PCBoard BBS system located in Reston, VA announced today that The Virginia Connection is one of the first bulletin boards in the United States selected by MCI Telecommunications, Inc. to participate as an official startup BBS member of the MCI PC CONNECT computer telephone network. MCI PC CONNECT is an exciting new program being offered by MCI which provides computer modem users with low long distance rates for telephone calls made to bulletin boards from both intrastate and interstate calls. MCI PC Connect(sm) FEE/RATES: ============================= - $3.00 monthly fee (does not apply towards usage) - Includes calling to continental U.S. in addition to Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. PC Connect Customer to NON-PC Connect Customer: ----------------------------------------------- $0.22 during Day (Mon-Fri: 8am - 5pm) $0.10 during E/N/W (Mon-Fri: 5pm-8am: Sat/Sun: 24 hours) PC Connect Customer to PC Connect Customer: ------------------------------------------- $.176 during Day $.08 during E/N/W Friends & Family discount does not apply to fee For an additional $1.50 per month, MCI PC Connect customers can include in-state calls at the same MCI PC Connect plan rates as above. Available in the following states: ================================== Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin Not Available in the following states: ====================================== Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming It is important to remember that you must be a member of MCI PC CONNECT in order to receive these rates! The thousands of computer bulletin board users should immediately contact MCI and become members of this low cost calling service to take advantage of the low rate structure and the ability to reach the best bulletin boards in the country at the best long distance rates. The Virginia Connection BBS has been in operation since 1985 and serves thousands of users. This BBS supports most computers with features which include: 50,000 programs available for downloading, National and International E-Mail via FidoNet, SmartNet, MetroLink, and RelayNet International Message Exchange, 20 incoming telephone lines connected to computer modems capable of operating from 1200 to 14400 baud, and on-line games for individual and team players. This BBS is a member of The Capital Area SysOps Association, a group of over 200 metropolitan Washington, DC area bulletin board operators. MCI PC CONNECT will allow computer users from most of the United States to participate on these bulletin boards for very reasonable long distance rates. Now long distance callers will be able to utilize the quality and depth of this exceptional BBS as local computer bulletin board users have done for years. Modem users can reach The Virginia Connection BBS by dialing (703) 648-1841. In order to receive all information regarding this MCI PC CONNECT service, call 1-800-333-2511 and MCI operators will provide you with more details. Call now! Do not delay! Don't be satisfied with less! Take advantage of the service -- save money! The Virginia Connection BBS c/o Systems Solutions 11088 Thrush Ridge Road Reston, VA 22091-4722 Contact: Tony McClenny Voice: (703) 758-7984 Modem: (703) 648-1841 -------------- Regards, B.J. Guillot ... Houston, Texas USA ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 04:37:50 -0400 From: Monty Solomon Subject: Ringmate/CNID on Panasonic EMSS Will Ringmate (distinctive ringing) and/or CNID work with the Panasonic KX-T123211D EMSS? Thanks, Monty Solomon / PO Box 2486 / Framingham, MA 01701-0405 monty%roscom@think.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1993 11:53:03 -0400 (EDT) From: jmiller@wendy.bowlgreen.oh.US (Jim Miller) Subject: Need Programming Info: Mitsubishi 1500 Cell Phone Hi everybody, I have a Mitsubishi 1500 TPK transportable cell phone, and would like some information on it. First, I would like the programming information on this unit. I recently switched cellular carriers, and they changed one of the security codes (for local/long-d/incoming only restriction, among other things) to 0000. If you have programming information on this unit, I would be more than happy to pay duplication and postage costs, in order to receive a copy of it. Second, this unit has some type of option for a data port. I have not been able to find any information, specifications, or even a place to purchase the option. If you know anything about this port, I'd like to hear from you. Thank you very much! Jim Miller - PLEASE RESPOND TO: jmiller@cinnet.sdrc.com, not the From: address. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 93 19:09:23 BST From: John.Slater@UK.Sun.COM (John Slater) Subject: Hotel Rip-Off - Is This a Record? I have just had the dubious pleasure of staying for a couple of weeks at the Hyatt Regency Alicante in Anaheim, California. Being an avid TELECOM Digest reader, I went straight to the rate card by the phone even before I unpacked my case. Even by British hotel standards (typically 400% mark-up on BT's standard unit charge), the Hyatt was extortionate. Consider what they charge for international calls: Operator-assisted rates (even though the call is direct-dialled) PLUS a $2.50 access charge per call! PLUS 45c per minute!! Even a conservative estimate for a five or ten minute call weighs in at several hundred percent mark-up. To my regret I never did call the 1-800 number listed on the card to compare AT&T's operator-assisted and direct-dial call charges, and I never did collar the hotel management to chew them out for such outrageous pricing -- I was working and had better things to do. Can anyone put some rough figures on these items? The charge for 1-800 calls was 75c, but they only seemed to charge this for long-distance access numbers such as MCI (1-800-950-1022). Local calls were 75c too. Plain old 950-1022 was blocked. The card said that all LD traffic was carried by AT&T, incidentally, but I did use 1-800-950-1022 from the room once. The domestic long-distance rates were similarly structured, but with a lower access charge and a lower per-minute charge. (WHY? Why should they rip me off any more just because I'm dialing overseas? The cost to them is the same. I guess the answer is "because they can" :-( ). Fortunately I was travelling on business, so I used BT's UK Direct 1-800 number with a BT card that is billed to my company. Next time I'm in the US privately, I'll be using Telepassport. Who needs COCOTs when hotels rip us off so effectively? John ------------------------------ From: jrallen@devildog.att.com (Jon Allen) Subject: Cell Phone Fraud and New Systems Organization: AT&T IMS - Piscataway, NJ (USA) Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 21:49:39 GMT I just got home tonight and turned on channel 4 from New York to see a story on new types of cell phone fraud. It said that thieves are using an ESN reader to read the ESNs and phone numbers right off the air as people drive by (it said that the phones transmit this info to the cell regardless of whether or not a person is talking), and then program them into their own phones to rip people off. The interesting part is that they said that next year, Cellular One would be converting over to a digital system which would solve the problem. I am curious if anyone knows more about this specifically. There must be some way to phase in the digital system so as that both the old and new systems are active at the same time. Do they share the same radio frequencies? If so, the system must somehow recognize the different phones. Or is this whole story just media hype? I was thinking about buying a cell phone, but if the current phones will be obsolete in a year, it seems wise to wait. Jon Allen [Moderator's Note: Yep, ESN 'readers' are the latest thing in vogue for phreaks. It lets them hit up the cellular carriers for a few million per year with stolen ESN's which are sold to other unsavory types. PAT] ------------------------------ From: kruse@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu Subject: Information Request on PCN/PCS Reply-To: kruse@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu Organization: Ohio University Computing & Technology Services Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 17:12:45 GMT I have been asked to write a section of a report being compiled for state regulators on Personal Communication Systems/Networks. My specific area is the technical interconnection of the PCN/PCS to the public (landline) network, including routing and number assignment issues. If you have any information you feel should be covered/included, or can point me to sources of information, please send these to me. The deadline is short, so electronic and FAX routes are preferred. Hans Kruse McClure School of Communication Systems Management Ohio University 9 S. College Street Athens, OH 45701 614-593-4891 (voice) 614-593-4889 (FAX) kruse@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu Thanks! ------------------------------ Subject: Competition at the LEC Level From: R.SHIN@sysb.ftc.gov Date: 09 Aug 93 09:53:43 EDT I am doing a study examining the effect of competition and different forms of regulation on local exchange carriers' costs. To conduct this study, I need information on the status of competition at the local exchange level in various states. I need to know whether competition is allowed in the provision of intraLATA toll service or in local exchange service. I would like to know when such competition was allowed for a given state or a tier-1 local exchange company, and additional information on how long it took before a competitor actually entered the market would be useful. Please e-mail me at R.Shin@sysb.FTC.edu I will summarize the replies and posted here. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 93 20:06 GMT From: Christopher Zguris <0004854540@mcimail.com> Subject: New Telecom Products in Sharper Image I don't want this to sound like a commercial, but the new Sharper Image catalog (800-344-4444) has a three interesting telecom items (only available from the catalog): 1) Fone Link -- Use your cordless phone to control IR remote control devices. No specific details in ad blurb. 2) Hands Free Ear Phone -- A hands free phone without a mike boom, the mic is built into the ear piece, so you only wear a ear bud-type earphone. 3) Cellular Phone Scrambler, scrambles cellular calls -- This one is interesting. The blurb says you install the device (custom-wired for your phone) and then call Secure-Net's 800 number and are billed by Secure-Net. I'm guessing that you call them using your secure line, then they call your party on a land-line. Does anyone know about Secure-Net? Is this something new? Christopher Zguris 485-4540@MCIMail.com [Moderator's Note: Ah, don't worry about commercializing this newsgroup. As any idiot would tell you -- and many of them have told me -- the death of Usenet occurred back in February when I made a three dollar profit on an Orange Calling Card someone purchased from my office. Why, the Chairlady of the California Cowgirls Association herself pronounced the benediction and led the singing of the closing hymn at the funeral service, which is still going on actually, there being so many stanzas to sing, each with the old familiar refrain. Like the catsup people, the organist has 57 Variations on a Theme, each with its own massive fugue. I guess they take a break for the pause that refreshes now and then when the cowgirl goes off stage to change into a fresh pair of (Mormon-defined) Holy Underwear, or 'garments' as they are known by LDS insiders. Anyway, you committed a grievous sin: you failed to include prices in your message and put stars and borders around the text, ala VIC-20 phreak BBS messages. And next time, include the phrases 'final offer! and 'one week sale!' in your message if you expect me to accept a bribe for running it here. You surely don't expect me to run anything here but Talk Ticket messages for free do you? PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 93 10:16:51 EDT From: fec@arch2.att.com Subject: Re: Another Look at Alex Bell Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories There's a rather interesting view of the life of Alexander Bell available to visitors to the Bell museum in Baddeck, Nova Scotia. I visited it decades ago and seem to remember learning that: - he was swindled out of his invention and his company very early on; - he became so bitter he left the country and renounced his citizenship; - he abandoned his interest in telephony and worked on manned flight. The museum has lots of information and displays on his kite experiments. This does seem inconsistent with the reported visits to Hawthorne families, etc. Can anybody confirm my recollections of this long ago visit? Needless to say, we aren't exposed to this view in house. Frank Carey at Bell Labs f.e.carey@att.com [Moderator's Note: He kept his considerable shares of stock in AT&T until his death at which time the stock passed to Mable; that hardly seems a way to swindle a man out of his invention and his company. They did go to Canada to live, but he returned quite often to the USA on business matters. He did grow disinterested in telephony which was the main reason he did not take an active role in the company; that and he didn't like many of the executives running things. But I don't think he ever felt he had been cheated. PAT] ------------------------------ Subject: Another Look at Alex Bell From: aaahq01!upchrch!joel@uunet.UU.NET (Joel Upchurch) Date: Mon, 09 Aug 93 13:43:16 EDT Organization: Upchurch Computer Consulting, Orlando FL acorn@info2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (Kai Schlichting) writes: > Some more information on Alex Bell: he had a deaf wife, but was not in > favour of the deaf community at all. In fact, he wanted to destroy > sign language, the only common denominator and centerpoint of culture > deaf people have, by forcing and promoting deaf people (including his > wife) to learn lipreading and have them go to oral school. If I am > right, he even promoted laws that would forbid deaf people to marry > (if both were deaf), to reduce the number of deaf people over all. > (Sidenote: This is nonsense of course; there are more than 150 common > causes for deafness, and only part of these are genetic reasons.) > Alex Bell was not a teacher for the deaf, he was the centerforce of > mainstreaming the deaf and destroying their unique culture, to clear > up with a myth, if it ever was one. To the deaf, he was the ultimate > person of intolerance and oppression. It looks to me like Kai wants to retroactively apply nineties standards of political correctness to a century ago. I really doubt that efforts to mainstream the deaf and teach them lip reading would be viewed as oppression by the standards of Mr. Bell's era. As for discouraging deaf people to marry it seems to me that could simply be because a child without at least one hearing parent would have greater difficulties learning to talk. It also seems hard to fault Mr. Bell for not having available to him our medical knowledge of the causes of deafness. (If your mail bounces use the address below.) Joel Upchurch/Upchurch Computer Consulting/718 Galsworthy/Orlando, FL 32809 joel@peora.ccur.com {uiucuxc,hoptoad,petsd,ucf-cs}!peora!joel (407) 859-0982 [Moderator's Note: And thank you for adding to this thread. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 00:49:36 -0400 From: Michael Covington Subject: Re: Administrivia: Looking at the Week Ahead of Us Organization: AI Programs, University of Georgia, Athens > August 11 An auspicious day: a spectacular meteor shower is predicted. Michael A. Covington, Associate Research Scientist Artificial Intelligence Programs mcovingt@ai.uga.edu The University of Georgia phone 706 542-0358 Athens, Georgia 30602-7415 U.S.A. amateur radio N4TMI [Moderator's Note: That's right! God is putting on the show in honor of the twelfth anniversary of this Digest, one of the oldest, if not the oldest continuing newsgroup/Internet mailing list on the net. :) PAT] ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #556 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa18168; 10 Aug 93 3:20 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA31291 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Tue, 10 Aug 1993 01:10:03 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA03057 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Tue, 10 Aug 1993 01:09:28 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 01:09:28 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308100609.AA03057@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #557 TELECOM Digest Tue, 10 Aug 93 01:10:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 557 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Status of Cellular Data (Gregory M. Paris) Re: Status of Cellular Data (A.N. Ananth) Re: Status of Cellular Data (Jim Rees) Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address (Steven J. Tucker) Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address (Garrett Wollman) Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address (Tad Cook) Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address (Blake Patterson) Re: Central Office Tours? (Tad Cook) Re: Central Office Tours? (Harold Hallikainen) Re: Radar Detectors (Michael Covington) Re: Radar Detectors (Harold Hallikainen) Re: LORAN -- LOng Range Aid to Navigation (Garrett Wollman) Re: Valid Card Declared Invalid? (Mike King) Re: Do We Have a Theme Song? (Jim Haynes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: paris@merlin.dev.cdx.mot.com (Gregory M. Paris) Subject: Re: Status of Cellular Data Organization: Motorola Codex, Canton, Massachusetts Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 18:27:20 GMT > Can anyone post an update on what's going on in the world of cellular > data? I used to assume that wireless data connectivity would evolve > out of alphanumeric pager service, but I gather that the cellular > voice carriers are gearing up to soak up their spare bandwidth by > providing cellular packet data. By no means do I claim to be an expert on this topic, but at last week's USENIX "Mobile & Location-Independent Computing Symposium" I heard a presentation by Phil Karn of Qualcomm on an IP-over-CDMA digital cellular implementation they've been working on. Phil mentioned an effective data rate of 8 kbps for this digital cellular IP connection. At least one attendee claimed to be able to better that rate using PPP, a Cellblazer (or maybe he said a Q-blazer) modem, and a regular analog cellular connection. In any case, the data rate doesn't compare favorably with a "hard-fibered" connection, but it still sounds pretty cool to me. Of course, you have to wait for CDMA to come to your cell system before you can take advantage ... Greg Paris Motorola Codex, 20 Cabot Blvd C1-30, Mansfield, MA 02048-1193 ------------------------------ From: ananth@access.digex.net (A N Ananth) Subject: Re: Status of Cellular Data Date: 9 Aug 1993 22:40:37 -0400 Organization: Biligiri International, Ellicott City, MD USA In article Peter Lucas writes: > Can anyone post an update on what's going on in the world of cellular > data? > Is this right? Hows it going? Anybody know what's coming down in > this area? Even though you ask specifically about cellular data, I assume you really mean wireless datacom. At Westinghouse, we are involved in putting together a geosynchronous satellite network that will provide mobile datacom coverage to the entire North American continent. This is the MSAT program and it offers a mobile field unit with a dish the size of a frisbee and optional cellular interoperable voice and fax to boot. Brief details are: X.25/X.3 connectivity, custom protocols for broadcast/multicast traffic, 2400/4800 bps, connectivity to all manner of datanets and other prodigy-like services is planned. The project is under active development and is expected to be pressed into commercial service in 3Q/4Q 1994. ananth Work: (410) 765-9281 ------------------------------ From: Jim.Rees@umich.edu Subject: Re: Status of Cellular Data Date: 9 Aug 1993 16:18:33 GMT Organization: University of Michigan CITI In article , Peter Lucas writes: > Can anyone post an update on what's going on in the world of cellular > data? This is part of our area of research, so I'll take a stab at it. I'm afraid this will be a bit US-centric, since that's what I'm familiar with. We mostly use analog modems over voice cellular. This is the cheapest way to go right now. Bandwidth is around 6-8 Kbps, call setup times are very long (a minute or so including modem connect time), and roaming is a problem, but coverage is pretty good and it's relatively cheap. There are currently two cellular data service providers in the US, Ardis and RAM Mobile. These systems are sort of like the cellular phone systems, but are data only, and are not affiliated with cellular phone. They have limited coverage, mostly only in cities and suburbs. Bandwidth is around 10 Kbps, setup times are small, and cost is about ten times that of analog modem over voice cellular. These services are resold by various value-adders, such as PSI, mostly for email. On the horizon, there are three proposals for data over voice cellular. CDPD, or Celluplan II, puts data into unused "holes" in the current cellular allocations. It's intended to piggyback onto existing systems as a transition to full digital cellular (see below). I think it's being tested in a number of places, but I don't know of any production deployment yet. Qualcomm CDMA uses spread-spectrum technology for digital voice. Now that Phil Karn is working at Qualcomm, there is a good chance that any CDMA systems will include provisions for data, probably using tcp/ip/ppp. CDMA is being tested in San Diego (home of Qualcomm) but hasn't been deployed anywhere. TDMA is a time-division multiplexed digital voice system that preceded CDMA but is technically inferior. I don't know whether it makes any provision for data, but I suspect it does. I think it's being tested in a few places (probably Chicago, home of Motorola). Either CDMA or TDMA, but not both, will eventually be the successor to today's AMPS analog system. Any digital voice cellular system will probably have to include some provision for data, since you can't run a modem over one of these. The big question is whether the data services will be priced reasonably, or priced like Ardis. Peter Honeyman has said that some day we may look back on the early '90s as the golden age of cellular data communication. There's also NAMPS, an analog stopgap being deployed by some cellular service providers in congested areas. It doesn't do data, and in fact probably won't even carry modem traffic. Then there's GSM, the non-US digital cellular system of the future. It's been deployed in a few places, and I think it has provisions for data, but I don't know much more about it. It's unlikely to be deployed in the US, since it wasn't invented here and can optionally use encryption, which our government would like to outlaw. ------------------------------ From: dh395@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steven J Tucker) Subject: Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address Date: 9 Aug 1993 17:07:32 GMT Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA) Reply-To: dh395@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steven J Tucker) In a previous article, elana@netcom.com (Elana Beach) says: > [Moderator's Note: Well, there is a company called 'Computer Detective' > which sells passwords to their system ... not inexpensively, I might > add. Its something like $750 for a password and a usage fee of some- > where above $20 per hour. In return you get access to drivers' records Where can I get more information about/from this company? Steve [Moderator's Note: I refuse to say because maybe I will become a dealer/representative for them in the near future. ... then I can further commercialize the net by giving you my office address at the Metro Office Building on Howard Street when you want to snoop on your neighbors. If that doesn't cause the Friends of Cowgirl to insist that their chairperson wear clean, fresh LDS-approved Holy Underwear at all times, I don't know what will. :). PAT] ------------------------------ From: wollman@trantor.emba.uvm.edu (Garrett Wollman) Subject: Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address Organization: University of Vermont, EMBA Computer Facility Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 18:40:29 GMT In article , TELECOM Moderator noted in response to Elana Beach : > PO Box info *is* public, you know, if you know who to ask and the > phrases to use when you invoke Freedom of Information. Yet another reason to buy this service from a company like Mail Boxes Etc. (And you get the added benefit that alternative carriers like UPS and FedEx can deliver to these "boxes".) I should point out that a lot of people, reporters especially, like to try to bluster their way to getting the information they want by referencing FOIA. Sometimes they do themselves more harm than good; mentioning FOIA in a Federal courthouse isn't likely to get you anywhere since the courts are not subject to FOIA and the officials who work there know it. (I could go into some detail about this, but won't.) Garrett A. Wollman wollman@emba.uvm.edu uvm-gen!wollman UVM disagrees. [Moderator's Note: Years ago, Postal Form 1537 (authorization to deliver mail to an agent, complete with true name and address of the final recipient of the mail) was mandatory, and postal inspectors would quite often review the forms. The mail drop was not supposed to start accepting mail for a client until the Post Office verified the form, which they did by giving it to the route carrier for the address specified as the 'true' address of the client. The carrier had to see if there was a mailbox at the address specified with the name specified so for a couple weeks the client had to scotch-tape the name "Smith" or whatever on the front of his mailbox along with his own name so the carrier would see it when he came past. Most mail drops are nothing more than fraud-hives with a few legitimate customers among the ranks of the carpet baggers and deadbeats. Now the form is voluntary. PAT] ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address Date: Mon, 9 Aug 93 15:26:47 PDT From: tad@ssc.com (Tad Cook) elana@netcom.com (Elana Beach) writes: > Great! But HOW? Where does one start to find out all the ways of > becoming a do-it-yourself private investigator? What books to buy or > what net.sources should I know about? Check out these books. I found them in the online database at Seattle Public Library: AUTHOR MacHovec, Frank J. TITLE Private investigation : methods and materials / by Frank MacHovec. PUBLISHER Springfield, Ill., U.S.A. : C.C. Thomas, c1991. AUTHOR Akin, Richard H. TITLE The private investigator's basic manual / by Richard H. Akin. PUBLISHER Springfield, Ill. : Thomas, c1976. tad@ssc.com (if it bounces, use 3288544@mcimail.com) Tad Cook | Packet Amateur Radio: | Home Phone: Seattle, WA | KT7H @ N7DUO.WA.USA.NA | 206-527-4089 [Moderator's Note: Or, get any of those dreadful, gory {True Detective Story} magazines at your local newstand and read the ads. There are plenty of manuals offered in the classified ads, along with skip-tracing services, mail drops and similar services in-between the "She Cut Off Her Husband's Head and Shipped the Rest in a Suitcase to San Jose" and "He Cruised the Malls Looking For Little Boys He Could Multilate" tales. {The Christian Science Monitor} they ain't; but not nearly as boring either. Never an issue without at least one mutilation murder or sex crime, usually as kinky as they come. :) PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 93 12:13:56 EDT From: blake@hou2h.att.com Subject: Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address Organization: AT&T In article ray.normandeau@factory.com (Ray Normandeau) writes: >> I decided to try the UnDirectory service mentioned by Blake Patterson >> (900-933-3330). It successfully got (and pronounced) my brother's name and >> address in Newton Highlands, MA. > How much does the service cost? The UnDirectory national reverse directory costs $1 a minute. (Service sponsor: Clarity Inc, P.O. Box 8357, Red Bank, NJ 07701.) When I call the UnDirectory service I usually can get three lookups a minute, but to get that rate I have to interrupt the spoken prompts and punch in digits fast. If the names and addresses are long, three listings take longer than a minute. One unadvertised UnDirectory feature I've found that speeds lookups: When I make a mistake during number entry, I can press * to erase the last digit. The voice states the remaining last three digits so I know where I am in the ten-digit number. (Pressing # during digit entry erases everything and I have to begin again.) Do any phone companies allow midstream digit correction when placing a phone call? I've never heard of that option, but I'd pay for it. Blake Patterson ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Central Office Tours? Date: Mon, 9 Aug 93 15:28:32 PDT From: tad@ssc.com (Tad Cook) co057@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steven H. Lichter) writes: > The last time I can remember PacBell having tours was some years ago > when electronic switching was just getting installed. I'm sure you > could get into one of their offices if you were to contact a division > staff office or their main office in San Ramon. I know GTE gives tours > to groups at times, but not like it was years ago. But then there are > not a lot of people left that can take the time to work these things > and try and answer some pretty dumb questions. Some time back US West switched our local exchange from a combined 1AESS/#5XBAR to a new 5ESS. I called the telco about a tour, and was told there would be one for the neighborhood right after the cutover. Following the cut date they had some labor problems, so they postponed the tour. They never did reschedule one. I called several times, but never could talk them into doing it. A few years later I was talking to a neighbor who worked for US West as a DA operator. She said they had a DA office where she worked on the top floor of that exchange. When I mentioned my disappointment about the tour, she said "lets go over there now, and I'll give you one!" (this was Sunday afternoon). We walked over to the office, she let us in with her keys, and I got to roam through the whole place. What particularly impressed me was the amount of empty space left in the building now that the old switches had been scrapped. Judging by the number of prefixes served out of this building, it currently has a maximum capacity of 80,000 lines. There is another CO a couple of miles away in a much smaller building that also serves eight prefixes. The old switch room on the first floor was completely vacant. There was a big battery room in the basement, and a lot of trunks and fiber optic equipment. The switch was in a bunch of cabinets on an upper floor. It was totally unmanned, at least on this weekend. There wasn't really much to see. Tours in the old days were probably much more interesting, with those old steppers or crossbars making all that wonderful racket. Maybe that is another reason why they don't do as many tours anymore. tad@ssc.com (if it bounces, use 3288544@mcimail.com) Tad Cook | Packet Amateur Radio: | Home Phone: Seattle, WA | KT7H @ N7DUO.WA.USA.NA | 206-527-4089 ------------------------------ From: hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) Subject: Re: Central Office Tours? Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 03:05:05 GMT Within the past few years, I've been able to arrange group tours of the General Telephone CO in Santa Maria, CA and the AT&T undersea cable termination here in SLO (in a several story underground building mounted on springs). Pretty neat stuff! Harold ------------------------------ From: mcovingt@aisun3.ai.uga.edu (Michael Covington) Subject: Re: Radar Detectors Organization: AI Programs, University of Georgia, Athens Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 04:37:36 GMT You are quite right; the Electronic Communications Privacy Act only forbids obtaining the _content_ of a transmission (they are thinking in terms of modulated sound, picture, or data). Detecting the _presence_ of a signal on a frequency is permissible (and is necessary for many kinds of engineering work and troubleshooting). But the reason a state might have jurisdiction over radar detectors is this: although they don't control radio transmitters or receivers, they do control automotive safety. Lots of places won't let you have a TV set in the car visible from the driver's seat, because they consider it a safety hazard. Similarly, they could argue that a radar detector is a device that impairs the safety of driving. (I'm not claiming to _agree_ with them; merely pointing out the possible argument.) In response to the acronymns thread: Initialisms (initial acronyms): Laser - Light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation Maser - Microwave... (ditto) CMOS - Complementary metal-oxide semiconductor Syllable acronyms: Transistor - trans(fer) (re)sistor Fortran - for(mula) tran(slation) Recursive acronyms: Gnu - Gnu's Not Unix Mung - Mung Until No Good Michael A. Covington, Associate Research Scientist Artificial Intelligence Programs mcovingt@ai.uga.edu The University of Georgia phone 706 542-0358 Athens, Georgia 30602-7415 U.S.A. amateur radio N4TMI ------------------------------ From: hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) Subject: Re: Radar Detectors Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 04:09:01 GMT All the legal issues surrounding use of radar detectors is interesting, but I don't think I'd want to be in the business of making something whose chief purpose is to help people violate the law. I've seen ads about how radar detectors promote safe driving. Somehow I'm not convinced ... Harold ------------------------------ From: wollman@trantor.emba.uvm.edu (Garrett Wollman) Subject: Re: LORAN -- LOng Range Aid to Navigation Organization: University of Vermont, EMBA Computer Facility Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 19:20:08 GMT In article , Bert Roseberry wrote: > LORAN stands for LOng Range Aid to Navigation. Just to get a bit of telecom relevance here, one interesting thing about the LORAN system is that it can be used to derive a very accurate time signal. Dave Mills and crew at the University of Delaware have actually developed a timekeeper that listens to a LORAN chain and provides a very precise timecode which can then be injected into the NTP matrix to provide global time service. For those who are unaware, NTP is the Network Time Protocol, a protcol for deriving the correct (according-to-standard) time and setting same on hosts, while operating over an unstable network of unbounded delay on hosts which normally do something else. According to various authorities, NTP provides time service for PBS, Kennedy Space Center, and the University of Vermont (at my insistence), using sources including the standard time and frequency stations CHU, DCF, MSF, and WWV, as well as LORAN-C, GPS, and the Australian national time standard. It is discussed in the newsgroup comp.protocols.time.ntp. Garrett A. Wollman wollman@emba.uvm.edu uvm-gen!wollman UVM disagrees. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 93 08:58:05 EDT From: mking@fsd.com (Mike King) Subject: Re: Re: Valid Card Declared Invalid? In TELECOM Digest, V13 #547, Pat asked: > How come whenever I want to change calling plans or do anything with > my AT&T account the answer is always it will be done whenever Illinois > Bell gets around to it, etc.? Because IBT acts as the agent for AT&T, under contract. Regardless of the disclaimer on your bills, IBT can and does provide much of the data entry and collections support for AT&T in your area. My former employer had an AT&T pro-WATS account for a while, and even though the plan was through AT&T, and only discounted calls carried by AT&T, the monthly adminstration fee was shown on the Ohio Bell records. Nine years after divestiture is a short time to undo over a hundred years of tradition. Mike King * Software Sourcerer * Fairchild Space * +1 301.428.5384 mking@fsd.com or 73710.1430@compuserve.com * (usual disclaimers) ------------------------------ From: haynes@cats.ucsc.edu (Jim Haynes) Subject: Re: Do We Have a Theme Song? Date: 9 Aug 1993 20:13:03 GMT Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz In article daniel@nstn.ns.ca (Daniel MacKay) writes: > ELO tunes: "Telephone Line" and "Ma Ma Ma Bell". Which reminded me of the old and terrible pun: Q: What is the first name of the telephone company? A: Michelle (Remember the Beatles song that goes, "Michelle, Ma Bell,...") haynes@cats.ucsc.edu haynes@cats.bitnet ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #557 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa18702; 10 Aug 93 3:55 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA05204 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Tue, 10 Aug 1993 01:42:43 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA28721 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Tue, 10 Aug 1993 01:42:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 01:42:07 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308100642.AA28721@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #558 TELECOM Digest Tue, 10 Aug 93 01:42:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 558 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Another Look at Alex Bell (Kai Schlichting) Re: Another Look at Alex Bell (Jim Cobban) Re: Anonymous UUCP (was Re: 900 Numbers; FTC Rules) Re: Anonymous UUCP (was Re: 900 Numbers; FTC Rules) (John Macdonald) Re: Borneo Malaysia Phones (Harold Hallikainen) Re: What is Category 5 (re: ISDN) (Harold Hallikainen) Re: Busy Signal Strangeness (was Re: Revisit ..) (Jack Winslade) Re: How Does Switched-56 Interwork With ISDN? (Fred R. Goldstein) Re: ATT Truevoice (Ken Thompson) Re: Modem/Data Tax - Technically Possible (David G. Lewis) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: acorn@info2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (Kai Schlichting) Subject: Re: Another Look at Alex Bell Date: 10 Aug 1993 05:47:08 GMT Organization: Newsserver, Comp.Center (RUS), U of Stuttgart, FRG Joel Upchurch (aaahq01!upchrch!joel@uunet.UU.NET) wrote: > It looks to me like Kai wants to retroactively apply nineties > standards of political correctness to a century ago. I really doubt > that efforts to mainstream the deaf and teach them lip reading would > be viewed as oppression by the standards of Mr. Bell's era. As for > discouraging deaf people to marry it seems to me that could simply be > because a child without at least one hearing parent would have greater > difficulties learning to talk. It also seems hard to fault Mr. Bell > for not having available to him our medical knowledge of the causes of > deafness. If you knew a few people I usually communicate with, they'd tell you that I am as politically incorrect as can be. But that's another matter. You say it wouldn't be seen as oppression a century ago -- yes. And that is as true as to say slaves are no human beings and deserve to work (in 1830 maybe) or Indians are nothing but savages (90 years ago?). Oppression must be perceived from the perspective of the oppressed, not the oppressors. The reason not to allow deaf people to marry in order to protect a (prospective) child is entirely bullshit (sorry about rude language, but it's really hitting a nerve of mine): The brother of my wife happens to be hard of hearing in an all deaf family, and the last time I met him, he spoke pretty damn well! (There was external help, sure, but he attends a normal school, for example, and signs equally well. This is called BiBi in the deaf communities (Bilingual, Bicultural). To line it out once more: it was Alex Bells' announced goal to eliminate the deaf and the deaf community (which not existed in those times), and to prevent deaf people from forming such a community. I realize well that he was not really knowing what he was talking about when arguing against marriages of deaf people, as he probably wasn't even interested to take a look at the facts, in the form of statistics: 95% of all children of (both) deaf parents are hearing. 95% of all deaf children have hearing parents. These are statistics that were accessible,or could have been produced at that time. Recognizing oppression and working against it is a part of PC that I endorse, I will disagree on the means, though, that I see all around me. Bye, Kai ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 12:11:00 +0000 From: Jim Cobban Subject: Re: Another Look at Alex Bell Kai Schlichting writes: > Some more information on Alex Bell: he had a deaf wife, but was not in > favour of the deaf community at all. In fact, he wanted to destroy > sign language, the only common denominator and centerpoint of culture > deaf people have, by forcing and promoting deaf people (including his > wife) to learn lipreading and have them go to oral school. If I am ... > Alex Bell was not a teacher for the deaf, he was the centerforce of > mainstreaming the deaf and destroying their unique culture, to clear > up with a myth, if it ever was one. To the deaf, he was the ultimate > person of intolerance and oppression. It is not reasonable to condemn Bell for holding a philosophy with regard to the education of the handicapped which is still very widely held today. It was Bell's position that the deaf should not be limited to the deaf community. By learning lip reading and learning how to vocalize speech which could be understood by the non-deaf, he felt that the deaf could operate as full members of hearing society. To that end he, among other things, established the first integrated school for deaf and hearing students. Do not confuse your own opinion, or what you and your wife feel is best for her, with a universal belief, even within the deaf community. Many deaf people worshipped Bell. For example Helen Keller dedicated her auto-biography to him, because he was the first person, other than her own father, who treated her as a human being who could be taught to function in society. It was at Bell's instigation that Helen's father hired Annie Sullivan as a tutor for his daughter. However many deaf people resent the dogmatism and paternalism of the education system which was instigated and inspired by Bell. Lip reading and vocalization or signed exact speech are useful to a deaf person communicating with a hearing person, but they are frustratingly slow for communication within the deaf community. I know that in Canada the Canadian Hearing Society and other deaf advocacy groups have been contending with the educational institutions run by the provinces in a long battle to introduce ASL as the primary instruc- tional language. What was Bell doing, in insisting upon [signed] English as the primary language of instruction, and in insisting that the students respond to the teacher in [signed] English, that is any different than the insistence of our hearing educational systems that immigrants be educated in the primary language of the country? It seems to me it is the deaf advocacy groups which are out of touch. Every other handicap that I hear about has its advocacy group insisting upon mainstreaming. For example the Association for the Mentally Retarded, at least in Canada, has changed its name to the Association for Community Living! Bell may not have been a teacher "for" the deaf, but he definitely considered himself to be a teacher *of* the deaf first, and an inventor second. Jim Cobban jcobban@bnr.ca Phone: (613) 763-8013 BNR Ltd. bnrgate.bnr.ca!bcars5!jcobban FAX: (613) 763-2626 [Moderator's Note: My thanks to all who participated in this thread which, despite the side you come down on, presented a side to Alex Bell that most telephone/communication enthusiasts know very little about. It was fun. Thanks Kai, Jim, others. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Aug 93 22:20:28 -0600 From: ivgate!jsw@uunet.UU.NET Subject: Re: Anonymous UUCP (was Re: 900 Numbers; FTC Rules) You are correct that UUCP connections are normally set up between two cooperating sites, but Uunet's service is an exception to this. I can probably find a machine-readable copy of their blurb on this if you want it. Uucp users can be set up on a system in several ways. One is to provide each site with a unique login name, often times beginning with 'uu' by custom, but not by any mandate. Any normal-looking user name will work as long as the Permissions are correct and that the login shell for that user login is set to /usr/lib/uucp/uucico or the local equivalent. Many times a common login name will be used for several sites. This can be 'uucp' or 'nuucp' in many cases but in actuality can be about anything. In this case the remote site is identified with the S{sitename} packet in the UUCP handshake sequence. In most cases, the UUCP is set up to return the terse 'You are unknown to me' in the case of an unknown site, but it can be set to accept a connection from any site. Uunet's service is simply a raw file copy -- the classical purpose of uucp, and not really on the level of the mail, news, and other uucp applications that we're familiar with. Their Permissions are set to give rdefault read permission to anyone. As I said, if you want some promotional material on this service, I can probably find it if I dig around here. Good day. JSW ------------------------------ From: jmm@Elegant.COM (John Macdonald) Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 14:12:59 -0400 Organization: Elegant Communications Inc. Subject: Re: Anonymous UUCP (was Re: 900 Numbers; FTC Rules) In article : >> [Moderator's Note: But as pointed out by some, UUCP operates without >> human intervention. So who is there to see the warning message? PAT] > In practice, no one. In theory, the calling site could turn on > debugging and the root user would later find the login banner in the > logs, if he cares to looks. Of course it's too late by then. > It's hard to imagine anyone "innocently" setting up the config files > and dialing the 900 number by uucp. More likely, the warning is meant > for unsuspecting browsers who try to dial in interactively. Actually, practice is closer to what is above described as theory ... Whenever a person configures a new connection for uucp, it is quite likely that the first time that they use that connection it wil be with debugging turned on. There is just too much room for special requirements or problems -- a typo in entering the phone number or chat script, need for longer than normal delays for a particular destination, choosing the best/right configuration choice [PEP, V32, etc.]. So the login banner would likely be visible to a human in passing, who might read it closely enough to notice particularly obnoxiopus terms. On the other hand, after the connection is set up and working, it is likely that a banner message "our rates just changed from $0.50/min to $99.99/min" would not be read by a human and would cause a big surprize on the subsequent phone bill. In the case of uunet's 900 number, it has been around long enough and it is clearly uunet's major source of revenue but a source of publicity and a "win leader" (they aren't losing on it, but otherwise it is much like a "loss leader") that people can have a certain amount of faith that they aren't going to have that sort of trick played on them. Earlier, Pat mentioned that the need to find out the directory layout on uunet to be able to ask for the particular files you want means that a personal (voice) contact would need to be made first. In fact, uunet provides a ls-lR.Z file which is a compressed recursive listing of the archive -- so all that is required is for the user to request *that* file from the 900 dial-in number, read through it to find out the pathname of the file(s) he really wants, and then ask for them. (And possibly a few others that he hadn't known he wanted until he saw them listed in the ls-lR.Z file. :-) (Disclaimer -- I haven't actually used the 900 line service, since our company has an regular account with uunet.ca.) John Macdonald jmm@Elegant.COM ------------------------------ From: hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) Subject: Re: Borneo Malaysia Phones Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 03:23:12 GMT In article JVE%FNAHA@TRENGA.UniGate1. Unisys.COM writes: > In Finland the Finnish Telecom markets only Motorola CT2 phone (called > Silverlink 2000). It is essentially a cordless phone using > frequencies around 864 MHz. 40 channels, digital communication at > 38400 bps range from 300 - 50 metres. Telepoint service allows only > outgoing calls; if you have bought your own base station, you can use > it at home as a normal cordless phone. The home base station is kinda interesting. It seems that these could form microcells for people passing by, except that they'd end up making someone's home phone line busy. Still, it would be interesting if somehow it would "find" another talk path and turn everyone's cordless phone base station into a microcell. Harold ------------------------------ From: hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) Subject: Re: What is Category 5 (re: ISDN) Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 04:05:35 GMT In article goldstein@carafe.tay2.dec. com (Fred R. Goldstein) writes: > One of the little sound bites I like to throw into my Transmission > class is that "at the bottom, all transmission systems are analog"! > So it's not a simple answer to a very good question. > At the U interface of the BRI (outside wire, local loop), the coding > is now usually "2B1Q". This takes two bits from the scrambled data > stream and encodes them as +2.5, +.7, -.7, or -2.5 (about) volts. So > one pulse is two bits (thus 2 Bits one Quat). Don't quote me on the > exact voltages; I don't have the spec handy. Again there's pulse > shaping. I've gotten several mile local loops (for FM radio stations) with 70 dB or more of dynamic range. So, why do they only use 4 levels in the 2B1Q? Seems like a lot more would be available (stuffing more bps into a baud) before noise starts making it difficult to determine what the actual transmit analog level is. Or, is the problem intersymbol interference where the level of one quat has an effect on those surrounding it, making the level of this particular quat difficult to determine? > To make all this work, impedance is specified, with very picky > transformers needed for S/T to meet spec. S/T uses separate transmit > and receive wires, thus a 4-wire interface. The BRI U uses one pair, > so there's some fancy echo cancellation done inside the transceiver > ("UBAT", in AT&T terms) chip. Real fancy. It seems that if the characteristic impedance of the line is matched, there should be no "far end echo", or , at least, it should be substantially attenuated. The "near end echo" (side tone on POTS) seems like it could be cancelled pretty well if we precisely know the impedance the line presents to the interface. If the far end has indeed terminated the line with its characteristic impedance, then it seems the near end should have the same impedance. I haven't messed with long twisted pairs to play with the transmission line effects, but it would sure be fun. It seems like the throughput of a line is going to be limited by its analog dynamic range and the attenuation versus frequency. Is the attenuation versus frequency (frequency response) reversible with an equalizer? It seems that most equalizers that adjust the amplitude response also adjust the phase response (making it nonlinear). It also seems that a long twisted pair would have a linear phase response (propogation delay relatively independent of frequency). Can we feed a high speed multilevel pulse waveform in one end of a twisted pair and, with equalization, pull it back out the other end? > 3002 lines are utterly obsolete. Voice-grade is now used for dial-up, > and the "state of the art" is being presented in the developing V.fast > world. In lieu of 3002 most phone companies (in America at least) > will sell you 56k service. THis could be provisioned using ISDN > technology, but in practice there are cheaper purpose-built line > drivers. We sell transmitter control and telemetry equipment to radio and television stations. They are generally using a 3002 type circuit to send 1200 to 2400 bps full duplex data. I'm wondering what other sort of leased line circuits they could use, and how the data could be coded to go down that line. Harold Hallikainen ap621@Cleveland.Freenet.edu Hallikainen & Friends, Inc. hhallika@oboe.calpoly.edu 141 Suburban Road, Bldg E4 phone 805 541 0200 fax 544 6715 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-7590 telex 4932775 HFI UI ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Aug 93 07:31:18 CST From: Jack.Winslade@axolotl.omahug.org (Jack Winslade) Subject: Re: Busy Signal Strangeness (was Re: Revisit ..) Reply-To: jack.winslade%drbbs@axolotl.omahug.org Organization: DRBBS Technical BBS, Omaha In a message dated 04-AUG-93, Jack Decker writes: > I can't really explain why this happened in your case, but I do know > that GTE North in Michigan has always used a "supervising busy" signal > as a test number (generally the exchange prefix + 9999) on their Now that you mention it, I do seem to recall some test numbers that supervised and de-supervised at about the cadence of a busy signal, but without the tone. If you called these through a couple of tandems or (better ;-) some toll circuits, they had a very amusing series of clunks and beeps. I assume these were used simply to check (whatever) for the proper response to far end supervision. Good day. JSW DRBBS, Omaha (1:285/666.0) ------------------------------ From: goldstein@carafe.tay2.dec.com (Fred R. Goldstein) Subject: Re: How Does Switched-56 Interwork With ISDN? Organization: Digital Equipment Corp., Littleton MA USA Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 04:23:16 GMT In article dank@blacks.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Daniel R. Kegel) writes: > One thing that I can't figure out is how a 56 kilobit/sec line can > talk to a 64 kilobit/sec line. Where do the rates get matched, and > does either of the PC's have to know how to do/undo the rate > adaptation? The Switched 56 network interworks with ISDN by using a 7-out-of-8 bit mapping, within the network, which is also called V.110/56k. The way 56k normally works is that the network carries it in 7 out of 8 bits in a 64k channel; the low order bit carries signaling and is always "1" during an active call. ISDN can give you all 8 bits (signaling is on the D channel) but the call setup message can indicate that V.110/56k is in use, and thus you know that the low order bit of each octet is padding. The ISDN card or TA has to know how to do this, but it's pretty standard. Example: My Gandalf 5510 ISDN Bridge/TA can do 56k. I had to test some software against a router in France. I dialed up the call using AT&T's Accunet Switched 56 service and connected. Most American ISDN gear handles 56k just fine, since it's the only option available in some areas (even on ISDN since the inter-office trunks are sometimes old). But the French folks had to hunt around for an ISDN terminal adapter that could handle it, since everything there is 64k clear channel. Fred R. Goldstein goldstein@carafe.tay2.dec.com Opinions are mine alone; sharing requires permission ------------------------------ From: ken thompson Subject: Re: ATT Truevoice Date: 9 Aug 93 14:36:59 GMT Organization: NCR Corporation Wichita, KS Someone mentioned their impressions of Truevoice. Lows boosted and overall volumne increased. Is not bandwidth needed to transmit a signal related to the bandwidth of the information in that signal. And if they reduce the highs, and the bandwidth requirements, does not let them get more voice channels into a given digital transmition channel? Is not this marketing getting people ready for the distorted sound quality as this carrier crams more voices on a wire? Will not high speed modems have trouble with this distored channel, switch to slower speeds automaticaly and maybe unknown to the user, and spend more time connected to get their data through? Am I too cynical? Ken Thompson N0ITL Disk Array Hardware Development Peripheral Products Division NCR Corp. an AT&T company 3718 N. Rock Road Wichita,Ks 67226 (316) 636-8783 Ken.Thompson@wichitaks.ncr.com ------------------------------ From: deej@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (david.g.lewis) Subject: Re: Modem/Data Tax - Technically Possible Organization: AT&T Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 16:36:24 GMT In article roeber@cern.ch writes: > Well, yes. Your fax or modem is taking a slow digital signal (say, > 9600) and converting it to an analog signal. The phone company is > hardly going to take this analog signal, re-digitize it up to 56k and > waste an entire voice channel on it. It's much more economical for > telco to demodulate it back to the original 9600 signal, wrap it up > with a few others, and put them all on one 56k line. "Economical" if the driving force in your cost equation is bandwidth. At the limits, if bandwidth is infinitely expensive and processing is infinitely cheap, the carrier should do as much processing as possible to minimize bandwidth; if bandwidth is infinitely cheap and processing is infinitely expensive, the carrier should use as much bandwidth as necessary to minimize processing. Reality is somewhere in the middle, of course; however, with 1.7Gb/s fiber optic transport systems all over the place, I'd submit that bandwidth is sufficiently cheap -- for a carrier -- that the processing necessary to recognize a signal as data, determine which modem standard is being used, connect the line to a modem of that type, run that through a subrate mux/demux, and put the whole thing on a data network -- at both ends of the connection -- is nowhere near economical. David G Lewis AT&T Bell Laboratories david.g.lewis@att.com or !att!goofy!deej Switching & ISDN Implementation ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #558 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa24317; 10 Aug 93 6:40 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA11238 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Tue, 10 Aug 1993 03:41:01 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA11806 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Tue, 10 Aug 1993 03:40:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 03:40:16 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308100840.AA11806@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #559 TELECOM Digest Tue, 10 Aug 93 03:40:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 559 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Leftover Drops (Mark A. Cnota) Re: Is This Legal? (Danny Padwa) Re: 950 Calling Cards (Johnny J. Chin) Re: AT&T Spending $5(m) on Video Games (G. Deinstadt) Re: Traffic Calculator Wanted (Hans Kruse) Re: Tracking Incoming Calls (Al Varney) Re: Motorola Iridium (?) Satalite-Based Message Network (Hans Kruse) Re: Flow Control With Unixware (Steve Cogorno) Re: Zoom Hotshot (*67) Problem (Glen Ecklund) Inter-LATA Caller*ID Arrives in NJ (Dave Levenson) What is the Makeup of Caller ID Data? (Cliff Sharp) What is TOPMS? (Dave Grabowski) Looking For Low-Cost Voice Mail System (Steve Herman) How Calls Are Billed With the 'Carte France Telecom' (Jean-Bernard Condat) ---------------------- TELECOM Digest is an e-journal devoted mostly -- but not exclusively -- to discussions on voice telephony. The Digest is a not-for-profit public service published frequently by Patrick Townson Associates. PTA markets a no-surcharge telephone calling card and a no monthly fee 800 service. In addition, we are resellers of AT&T's Software Defined Network. For a detailed discussion of our services, write and ask for the file 'products'. The Digest is delivered at no charge by email to qualified subscribers on any electronic mail service connected to the Internet. To join the mail- ing list, write and tell us how you qualify: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu. All article submissions MUST be sent to our email address: telecom@eecs. nwu.edu -- NOT as replies to comp.dcom.telecom. Back issues and numerous other telephone-related files of interest are available from the Telecom Archives, using anonymous ftp lcs.mit.edu. Login anonymous, then 'cd telecom-archives'. At the present time, the Digest is also ported to Usenet at the request of many readers there, where it is known as 'comp.dcom.telecom'. Use of the Digest does not require the use of our products and services. The two are separate. All articles are the responsibility of the individual authors. Organi- zations listed, if any, are for identification purposes only. The Digest is compilation-copyrighted, 1993. **DO NOT** cross-post articles between the Digest and other Usenet or alt newsgroups. Do not compile mailing lists from the net-addresses appearing herein. Send tithes and love offerings to PO Box 1570, Chicago, IL 60690. :) Phone: 312-465-2700. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: mac@rci.chi.il.us (Mark A. Cnota) Subject: Re: Leftover Drops Organization: Ripco Communications Incorporated Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 22:29:49 GMT There is, and probably always will be, "multiple plant" in most urban areas. This means that the telco will terminate the same central office pairs in more than one place, so they can be used at either depending on where the need is. This is cheaper than providing everyone with their own separate pairs all the way back to the C.O., including what you can predict for "future use" which may or may not ever be used. I think we can agree that it's economically unfeasible to send a technician out to disconnect every unused drop or even to pull a jumper wire at an interface box or inside terminal when a line is disconnected. Pat's example above is a little extreme because not too many single family homes have direct central office counts in them. What is more common is for the drop wire (and the interface cross-connect if applicable) to stay in place after a line is disconnected so that if another line is ordered the same facilities can be re-used, saving manpower. Now if the same central office pair is in multiple with another interface or even direct to a distribution terminal, it may get used over there at any time. The result would be the appearance of dial tone in both places, including going all the way through the "saved" cross-connect and drop wires, and through to someone's black-yellow or whatever depending on house wiring. The bottom line is this is a wiring problem (detarriffed) and is the responsibility of the property owner. In a multi-tenant residential or business situation, the subscriber should NOT be hunting around on the 66 block, the TELCO's side of the NETPOP. All new terminal installations have the telco side and customer side clearly marked. And if you request, the telco MUST convert your existing service to Network Interface, which provides you with an RJ-11 jack or RJ-21X connecting block. This is a result of deregulation and some people still aren't used to the idea. As a general rule with the exception of wire maintenance plans, the telco can't be responsible for customer wiring and associated problems, including anything on the customer side of the demarcation point (NETPOP). The above paragraph only applies to my knowledge of tarriffs effective in Illinois Bell's serving area and might be different elsewhere. Mark A. Cnota (Ameritech Outside Plant Engineering) mac@rci.chi.il.us mcnota@interaccess.com [Moderator's Note: Are you suggesting that it is *my problem* if my phones are disrupted because in the building down the street some tenant decides to save the cost of a professional installation by doing it themselves and they park on my dial tone instead of their own? You are correct that not too many single family homes have direct central office counts in them, but Chicago is made up of lots and lots of older highrise buildings with a rat's nest of wiring in the basement for tenants and others to get into. Sure we have single family homes here but we also have a lakefront full of one highrise after another, many dating back years to when all those buildings had switchboard service in them with a front desk lobby clerk. Most of the old buildings got rid of their switchboards twenty years ago in lieu of the tenant having their own phone service. Where telco had previously had fifteen or twenty pairs come in and terminate on the switchboard as trunk lines serving maybe 100-120 apartments, when the board was yanked they had to come up with another hundred pairs or so from the street that they could 'wire through' the big terminal box in the basement to the house pairs into each apartment. Now where does customer premises wiring begin exactly? Just inside the four walls of my apartment, or at the house pair terminal box out in the hall, or in the basement at the big box, or where? In many big old buildings, even the house pairs are multipled between floors for gosh sakes! Do the house pairs belong to the building or are they part of telco plant? If the building, then the building janitor can work on them, right? If the wires inside my apartment are my responsibility and I refuse to have wire-maintainence, then if the yellow/black pair I am not using get shorted somehow is it my problem, the person living down the street's problem or telco's problem? When we had the big Chicago River flood last year, companies which got no flood-water at all still lost their phone service. Why? Because all their pairs showed up as multiples in the basement of the Pittsfield Building, two blocks away, under twenty feet of water, or in the basement of the Board of Trade Building under water. Whose fault is that? You are correct that people who live in the suburbs in ticky-tacky houses that all look just the same have a few pairs neatly put on the back of their house, and that is it. Not so in Chicago. The fire in the Paxton Hotel which killed 36 people several months ago also knocked out phones in splotches all over the neighborhood because everything in the big terminal box behind the Paxton switchboard got melted in the fire. Not to make light of the tragedy, but who do I sue if my phones are not working, the owners of the Paxton for the poor maintainence of their wires? Or would you say my wires in their custody, or? None of those big old wooden cabinets have locks on them; you just lift the wooden front up and out of the way. Most people do not even realize that between themselves and the CO may be five or six places the pair can be jumped -- just look in the basement of the building down the street. I should start a school and teach the general public about their phone service. Bell would hate me for it. :) PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1993 09:31:05 -0400 (EDT) From: padwad@psd.gs.com (Danny Padwa) Subject: Re: Is This Legal? > And -- I'm curious as to technical sides of the system. Our system is > each phone line has an outside number (direct dial in). We dial > 9+xxx-xxxx to get out, but can dial the last five digits within > campus. (All numbers ar 617-49x-xxxx). What exactly would be the > term for this type of system? Would it generally be capable of > providing 10xxx access? > [Moderator's Note: The name for your system is centrex. Yes, it can > provide 10xxx dialing. PAT] Is Centrex the only service that can provide this? Harvard recently (last three years) rebuilt its phone system (down to the local loops). It had been Centrex before, but when they were installing it their literature referred to the installation of their own 5ESS switch on Ware Street. This services the (617) 493, 495, and 496 exchanges At the same time that this went in, the student (not staff/faculty) numbers switched from the 498 to 493 exchange, and service (billing, changes, features, etc) switched from New England Tel to the campus folks. They also have an interesting system for billing calls ... any call that is chargeable (not "local" based upon the phone's calling plan) requires the input of your PIN. This allows making long-distance calls from other people's rooms, and also (they say) helps avoid roommate squabbles over phone charges, since everyone gets their own bill. It also opens a huge avenue for fraud (figure ~6.5k students, 5 digit PIN ... shouldn't take too many guesses), but now that the University runs the phones, phone fraud is a University offense, and grounds to be "required to withdraw". I know that Columbia has a similar policy of billing a person, rather than a phone, for LD calls. Is this common? Danny Padwa padwad@psd.gs.com (or padwa@husc3.harvard.edu) ------------------------------ From: jchin@panix.com (Johnny J Chin) Subject: Re: 950 Calling Cards Date: 9 Aug 1993 16:28:14 -0400 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC In article , Marshall Levin wrote: > dan.srebnick@islenet.com writes: >> I work in a facility served by an ESS CO Centrex. The telephone >> company has a toll restriction on most lines. Unfortunately, this >> seems to restrict outgoing 800 calls as well as the ability to dial a >> 0+ call. I'm looking for a carrier that offers 950 access on their >> calling cards. I am not restricted from dialing 950-xxxx calls. > In addition to being able to use the 800 number, I have found that I > can use my MCI card with 950-1022 by dialing 950-1022 + destination > number + card number. Does anyone know the 950-xxxx number for US-Sprint and AT&T? Oh, AT&T now has an 800 number (in case the 10288 or 10-ATT does not work): 800-321-0ATT 800-321-1288 Thanks for all replies. Johnny J. Chin (jchin@panix.com) LAN/WAN/PC Consultant Onesimus Enterprises Int'l Inc. ------------------------------ From: GVC.COM!GDeinstadt (Gord Deinstadt) Subject: Re: AT&T Spending $5(m) on Video Games Organization: Not officially GeoVision Systems Inc., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 17:27:06 -0400 In Paul Robinson writes: > A few years ago some other company did the same thing, e.g. allow > people to connect to a system and access video games and the > equivalent. The company went bankrupt because people couldn't see > paying a monthly fee for access to video games when you can purchase > them once. Access to other people might be more valuable, I'm not > sure. Nabu did this in Ottawa, and although the company failed they had no trouble selling consumers on the deal. In marketing trials something like 75 or 80 percent of customers signed up to pay after their free trial was over, an astonishingly high rate. Basically their kids wouldn't let them drop out. This was some years ago and the cost of video game cartridges and hard disks has dropped, while the bandwidth of cable (8 Mb/s in the Nabu system) no longer seems so great. But the main problem is that all the popular games are sewn up by the video-game makers and they seem oblivious to the possibilities for telcom. I do think that "access to other people" as you put it is worth a WHOLE lot; games are just games but other people are friends. Nintendo or a competitor could have set up a data network for long-distance game playing years ago. Their failure to do so, or even to provide cheap modems and support for them in their games, is IMO one of the great business blunders of the 20th century. (Right up there with Telex providers ignoring the advent of PCs.) Gord Deinstadt gdeinstadt@geovision.gvc.com <-- for the moment ad577@freenet.carleton.ca <-- permanent ------------------------------ From: kruse@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu Subject: Re: Traffic Calculator Wanted Reply-To: kruse@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu Organization: Ohio University Computing & Technology Services Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 16:46:34 GMT In article , mcharry@cwc.com (McHarry) writes: > At one time I had a neat little program for doing traffic calculations > on a PC. Does anyone know where to find another? It was a lot nicer > than using the tables. Telecom Library sells a traffic engineering handbook by Harder, Wand and Richards; they include a PC program to compute most (but not all) the tables in the book. Hans Kruse ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 93 11:57:43 CDT From: varney@ihlpe.att.com Subject: Re: Tracking Incoming Calls Organization: AT&T In article karenc@oakhill.sps.mot.com (Karen Conyngham) writes: > I work for a social service agency and we cannot answer all the > calls we receive. As a result, even though we put many people on > hold, we still have a number of abandoned calls. We can install a "Abandoned" calls in telephony terms are those that ring but are not answered. Calls that reach "busy" are not "abandoned". > We need a method of tracking the number of calls to a particular > number, versus the the number of calls that get answered. We do not > want our legislators calling in to an Automatic Call Director. Isn't such "special" treatment just another means of "spoiling" them??? That aside, most telephone companies are capable of performing all sorts of "line studies" to determine number of calls reaching busy, number answered, average call duration, etc. Even if you're on a PBX, some of those measurements are useful. If you are not paying "business" rates, they may be less eager to do the studies. If they thing it will result in new lines or service sales to you, the marketing group should be happy to discuss their measurement capabilities. Al Varney - just my opinion ------------------------------ From: kruse@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu Subject: Re: Motorola Iridium (?) Satalite-based message network ? Reply-To: kruse@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu Organization: Ohio University Computing & Technology Services Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 16:44:20 GMT In article , adykes@jpradley.jpr.com (Al Dykes) writes: > I recall that Motorola and a bunch of other companies announced plans to > build a network of low orbit satelites to do store-and-forward messaging. > This was a year or more ago. I have not heard anything since. An article in the August 2 {Wall Street Journal} says that the "first round of funding" has been completed, and gives some details of the project status (nothing really new, however). Hans Kruse kruse@ouvaxa.cats.ohiou.edu ------------------------------ From: cogorno@netcom.com (Steve Cogorno) Subject: Re: Flow Control With Unixware Date: Mon, 9 Aug 93 17:36:43 PDT > I've also seen a box marketed especially for computers, that allows > the computer to be off, and will power it up when a call comes in. It > monitors the modem connection, and will turn the power off again after > the user disconnects and a time delay elapses. So, if the computer > hangs, you just need to disconnect and stay off for the time delay > period. May not work too well for systems with multiple users, or if > you would rather leave the system powered up all the time. The cost > of this particular switch was just under $200. Greg, If this is for a Mac, there is a box called PowerUP that costs about $35. Works great. As soon as a ring is detected, a Power On Signal is sent through the ADB (Apple Desktop Bus -- the port you plug your keyboard in) and the Power Supply (which is constantly monitoring for this signal) fires up the Mac. Steve cogorno@netcom.com ------------------------------ From: glen@slate.cs.wisc.edu (Glen Ecklund) Subject: Re: Zoom Hotshot (*67) Problem Organization: U of Wisconsin Madison - Computer Sciences Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 04:15:05 GMT davep@carson.u.washington.edu (Dave Ptasnik) writes: > Based on recent discussion here, I went out and bought a Zoom Hotshot > Dialer from the local Graybar office. It was less than $50 and was > very straight forward to set up. > I set it to send a *67 one second after hearing a dialtone the first > time on every call and it works like a champ. > The problem: the unit apparently interferes with my modem. Calls at > 14.4 will no longer connect to any other site, including the Practical > Peripherals BBS. Calls at 9600 or slower seem to be OK. I suggest that you get one of those $6 (I think) gizmos which are sold to cut off the answering machine when a phone is picked up. Rig it to cut off the Hotshot when the modem is active. This might not work, however, depending on your wiring configuration, as you might not be able to make it cut off the Hotshot for the modem without cutting it off when a phone set at another location is used. Before I got my second line, I had the gizmo set to disconnect all phones when the modem was in use, so that no one would accidentally interfere with my modem connection. Glen Ecklund glen@cs.wisc.edu (608) 262-1318 Office, 262-1204 Dept. Sec'y Department of Computer Sciences 1210 W. Dayton St., Room 3355 University of Wisconsin, Madison Madison, Wis. 53706 U.S.A. ------------------------------ From: dave@westmark.com (Dave Levenson) Subject: Inter-LATA Caller*ID Arrives in NJ Organization: Westmark, Inc. Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 01:27:24 GMT In early July, we began seeing area codes other than 908 and 201 on our Caller*ID display. For the first time since the service was offered in the state, we also began seeing an occasional "PRIVATE NUMBER" display. Some experimentation has shown that inter-LATA calls carried by Cable & Wireless to our 800 number are the only ones that deliver these out-of-area numbers. Calls dialed to our 908 number via AT&T, MCI, and US-SPRINT still arrive as OUT OF AREA. Calls placed over Cable & Wireless to our 908 number also show OUT OF AREA if they are billed using the C & W calling card. If there's anybody out there who is not in the Northern New Jersey LATA, and who uses Cable & Wireless without a calling card (as a dial-1 carrier, or who can select it with 10223) who would like to call us on our 908 number, we can see if that works. It would appear that the arrival of 800 portability coincided (approximately, at any rate) with the arrival of intra-LATA Caller*ID on 800 calls. Is this a coincidence or not? (Note: We also get 800 service from Telecom*USA, and they do not yet deliver Caller*ID to New Jersey Bell.) Dave Levenson Internet: dave@westmark.com Westmark, Inc. UUCP: {uunet | rutgers | att}!westmark!dave Stirling, NJ, USA Voice: 908 647 0900 Fax: 908 647 6857 ------------------------------ Subject: What is the Makeup of Caller ID Data? Date: Mon, 9 Aug 93 13:26:18 CDT From: Cliff Sharp While we're on the subject of CNID software, does anyone have the data on the actual data format of the CNID data transmitted down the telephone line between rings 1 and 2? I'm looking for bit-by-bit breakdown. Of course it's available from Bellcore, but my present state of poverty precludes any such luxury. If anyone would be willing to share the information, I'd appreciate it. Don't know if the net is interested in such, so unless a Moderator's note below suggests otherwise, email might be prudent. Cliff Sharp clifto@indep1.chi.il.us OR clifto@indep1.uucp WA9PDM Use whichever one works ------------------------------ From: dcg5662@hertz.njit.edu (Dave Grabowski) Subject: What is TOPMS? Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 05:17:56 GMT The subject says it all. What is TOPMS? A friend of mine works for some company that does surveys for AT&T PBX System customers, and this TOPMS thing keeps coming up. He wants to know what the heck it is (and now I wanna know, too!) Dave dcg5662@hertz.njit.edu 70721.2222@compuserve.com ------------------------------ From: sjh@philabs.philips.com (Steve Herman) Subject: Looking For Low-Cost Voice Mail System Organization: Philips Laboratories, Briarcliff, New York Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 16:36:46 GMT I am looking for an inexpensive, stand-alone voice mail system. It should have at least one incoming mail box to record sequences of incoming messages. It needs to have several (four or more) outgoing mail boxes which can be accessed by phone callers in response to verbal prompts ("For information about foo1 press 1 on your touch tone telephone.") I know that I can get this (and much more) with PC add-on cards. However, I do not want to run a PC 24 hours a day. Therefore, I am looking for a stand alone unit. Any hints would be appreciated. Thank you, Stephen Herman ------------------------------ From: cccf@email.teaser.com (Jean-Bernard Condat) Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 09:11:10 GMT Subject: How Calls Are Billed With the 'Carte France Telecom' Since July 1st, France Telecom is pleased to announce the new 'Carte France Telecom' in place of the old 'Carte Pastel'. Two types of card are available: (1) 'Carte France Telecom selection' with ten pre-dial phone numbers. You can give it to your children with only the possibility to dial your private and businness numbers; (2) 'Carte France Telecom' that give you the opportunity to phone without any coins: * from a public phone: the calls are bill all five calls directly on your phone bill associated with the card; * from any public or private line via the automatic 3610 service (in France) and 'France Direct' service in all major countries (same billing process). The card possess an electronic encoding device with a 13-digit number on it ... and a four-digit secret code (send by separate mail as soon as you order the card). The new services already offer is the possibility to phone from the TGV ("train a grande vitesse") in France and the possibility to ask directly for a translator help between you and a foreigh corres- pondant. Yesterday, I was in a great hotel and I have use my Carte France Telecom for my work. My surprise was to discover that the hotel had bill me 4 U (1 UT=FF.73 and is the minimal billing unit in France) for the use of the free 3610 service. This night I have phone 45 times for zero FF ... but I will bill FF 131.40 for having use the hotel's phone :-) Jean-Bernard Condat General Secretary Chaos Computer Club France, B.P. 155, 93404 St-Ouen Cedex, France Private Address: P.O. 8005, 69351 Lyon Cedex 08, France Phone: +33 1 40101764, Fax: +33 1 47877070 InterNet: cccf@altern.com or cccf@email.teaser.com ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #559 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa26976; 11 Aug 93 1:51 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA13358 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Tue, 10 Aug 1993 23:22:39 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA20990 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Tue, 10 Aug 1993 23:22:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 23:22:00 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308110422.AA20990@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #560 TELECOM Digest Tue, 10 Aug 93 23:22:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 560 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson CPSR and the NII (Mark Boolootian) Error Rates For 2400 Baud Modems (Dave Mc Mahan) ADSI-Protocol (Arnaud Leene) Desperate SWF Needs Help! (Margaret Labrecque) Re: Is This Legal? (Donald R. Sailer) Re: Is This Legal? (Bonnie J. Johnson) Re: Is This Legal? (Marc Unangst) Re: LORAN -- LOng Range Aid to Navigation (Floyd Davidson) Re: An Experience With the AT&T Language Line (Christian Weisgerber) Telecomics - Just Like a COCOT (David Leibold) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: booloo@framsparc.ocf.llnl.gov (Mark Boolootian) Subject: CPSR and the NII Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 12:28:44 -0700 (PDT) Passed on to the group FYI: Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 09:43:40 PDT From: Nikki Draper Subject: CPSR and the NII COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS ADD SOCIAL CONSCIENCE TO NATIONAL NETWORK DEBATE Palo Alto, Calif., August 6, 1993 -- At a recent meeting in Washington D.C., board members from Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR) were challenged by top level telecommunications policy experts to craft a public interest vision of the National Information Infrastructure (NII). The experts at the roundtable discussion included Mike Nelson from the President's Office of Science and Technology, Vint Cerf from the Internet Society, Jamie Love from the Taxpayer's Assets Project, Ken Kay from Computer Systems Policy Project, and Laura Breeden from FARnet. "We were excited to discover that CPSR is in a position to play a key role in shaping NII policy," said CPSR Board President, Eric Roberts. "The commercial sector is already in the thick of the debate, but there has been little coordinated response from the noncommercial constituencies. After talking about the issues and CPSR's role, the Board committed to meeting this challenge." So far, the debate about the NII has centered around fiber versus ISDN, cable companies versus telephone companies, research versus commercialization, and so on. These are real questions with important implications. However, CPSR believes that a better starting point is a set of guiding principles as the context for all these more detailed questions about "architecture," technical standards, and prime contractor. Before arguing over bits and bytes, it is crucial to clarify the vision and values that underlie a major endeavor like the NII. As individuals in the computing profession, CPSR's membership knows that new technologies bring enormous social change. CPSR's goal is to help shape this change in an informed manner. Key issues discussed in the paper will include: o ensuring that the design remains both open and flexible so that it can evolve with changing technology. o ensuring that all citizens have affordable network access and the training necessary to use these resources. o ensuring that risks of network failure and the concomitant social costs are carefully considered in the NII design. o protecting privacy and First Amendment principles in electronic communication. o guaranteeing that the public sector, and particularly schools and libraries, have access to public data at a reasonable cost. o seeking ways in which the network can strengthen democratic participation and community development at all levels. o ensuring that the network continues to be a medium for experimentation and non commercial sharing of resources, where individual citizens are producers as well as consumers. o extending the vision of an information infrastructure beyond its current focus of a national network, to include a global perspective. The national membership of CPSR brings a unique perspective to the overall conception of the NII. Throughout CPSR's history, the organization has worked to encourage public discussion of decisions involving the use of computers in systems critical to society and to challenge the assumption that technology alone can solve political and social problems. This past year, CPSR's staff, national and chapter leadership have worked on privacy guidelines for the National Research and Education Network (NREN), conducted a successful conference on participatory design, created local community networks, organized on-line discussion groups on intellectual property, and much more. To ensure that its position paper is broadly representative, CPSR will work in concert with other public interest groups concerned about the NII, such as the newly established coalition in Washington D.C., the Telecommunications Policy Roundtable. CPSR chapters are will be conducting a broad based public campaign to reach out beyond the technical experts and producers -- to people who will be affected by the NII even if they never directly log on. CPSR will begin distributing its completed paper to policy makers on October 16th at its annual meeting in Seattle, Washington. The meeting will bring together local, regional and national decision makers to take a critical look at the NII. Founded in 1981, CPSR is a national, non-profit, public interest organization of computer scientists and other professionals concerned with the impact of computer technology on society. With offices in Palo Alto, California, and Washington D.C., CPSR works to dispel popular myths about technological systems and to encourage the use of computer technology to improve the quality of life. For more information on CPSR's position paper , contact Todd Newman, CPSR board member, at 415-390-1614. For more information about CPSR, contact Nikki Draper, Communications Director, at 415-322-3778 or draper@csli.stanford.edu. ------------------------------ From: mcmahan@netcom.com (Dave Mc Mahan) Subject: Error Rates For 2400 Baud Modems Organization: Dave McMahan @ NetCom Services Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 18:18:57 GMT Dear Telecom Modem Users, I am currently trying to design yet another phone modem protocol that is capable of handling some unique requirements of my product. After looking at the various standard modem protocols out there, I have found that none will be able to fulfill all the objectives I need. This is mainly due to lack of efficiency (Kermit and XMODEM fall into this category) or inability to pass data in two directions at the same time (ZMODEM falls into this category). To make a long story short, a unique protocol is required. I have specified a protocol that will do the job. My problem lies in the fact that I don't have good data on types of errors that occur when going through the public telephone network. This means I can't pick the optimal message packet size to trade off protocol efficiency versus retransmit probability. I would like input from you as to where I can find this data. Ideally, I'd like to get something in print so that I can justify selection of various parameters in my protocol. A publication, magazine, or book would be ideal. If the information exists at an FTP site or one some network like CompuServe, I would like to get a reference so I can go look it up. If you only have information locally due to your past experience or testing, I'd also like to get that. Please e-mail me directly with your references or info, as I don't normally read all the newsgroups I'm posting this to. Information I'm Trying To Find: I'd like to get specific answers the following questions. In most cases, I'm looking for hard numbers such as "AT&T guarantees a bit error rate of 1e-5 or better for 99% of the time". I don't need to get answers such as "Your protocol should still work even if you get an error once in a while." My specific environment is using a 2400 baud modem running the CCITT V.22bis modulation scheme. The link will be using standard dial-up voice quality lines available in North America and Europe. A variety of long distance carriers could be used (AT&T, MCI, Sprint, etc.), so please feel free to differentiate based on the specific carrier if you have that type of information. I will be using modems that are compliant with the Hayes-AT command set. One side of the link will be a custom embedded product. The other side will be an MSDOS clone running custom software for this application. Both sides will be using custom software and can be adjusted for optimal conditions. 1) What types of errors usually occur? Can I assume random errors due to background noise (thus giving me a normal distribution of errors) or are errors most probably going to occur in bursts? 2) What are the specific probabilities of the various error mechanisms? (I'd like numbers such as 1 error in 100,000 for 98.5% of the time). 3) What are the general worst-case error probabilities I am likely to encounter? 4) What are the effects of Call-Waiting on my carrier? Will I always lose carrier if Call-Waiting interruption occurs, or can I set my modem parameters to be more tolerant of such errors? If I do make such changes, what side effects am I likely to see? Thanks for helping me out on this. Once again, please e-mail information and references directly to me rather than posting to the newsgroup. Dave McMahan mcmahan@netcom.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 11:58:56 +0000 (GMT) From: A.Leene@research.ptt.nl (Arnaud Leene) Subject: ADSI-Protocol Organization: PTT Research, The Netherlands I am currently looking at the ADSI-protocol. This protocol is meant to make the users of CLASS-services happier. ADSI allows for the mixing of data and voice. Thus the access to information services will be much user friendlier than for instance the videotex-protocol. In order to use ADSI the customer needs specific CPE, such as a Smart Phone. It is unclear to me what the status of ADSI is at the moment. I have the following questions: - Is ADSI alreay a (Bellcore) standard? - Will ADSI be implemented by the RBOC's? When? - Are there any pilots in the U.S.? - Who will deliver Customer Premises Equipment? If you have an answer or can tell me where I can get an answer, many thanks. Dr. Arnaud Leene PTT Research Tele-informatics Post: P.O. Box 15000, 9700 CD Groningen. Fysical: Winschoterdiep OZ 46, 9723 AC Groningen Voice: +31 50 821086 Fax: +31 50 122415 Email (Internet): A.Leene@research.ptt.nl Email (X.400): C=NL;A=400Net;P=PTT Research;S=Leene ------------------------------ From: octela!!margaret@uunet.UU.NET (Margaret Labrecque) Subject: Desperate SWF Needs Help! Organization: Octel Communications Inc., Milpitas Ca. Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1993 01:50:13 GMT Help! I'm in marketing hell. Former engineer (MIT MSEE '89) is in between 1st and 2nd years of Stanford MBA program and naively fell into a summer job which demands that she get a bunch of surveys filled out. "I'm desperate; my brain is becoming mush; cold-calling just isn't my forte ... PLEASE HELP!" This information will be used to evaluate the compatibility of technologies that could integrate your computer and telephony communication systems (voice-mail, E-mail and Fax) and will not be made available to any parties outside of the surveying organization. If you have any questions, call Margaret LaBrecque at (408) 321-3783. Please give answers for your site only and fill this out only if your company uses VOICE-MAIL. Name: Title: Company Name/Division: Street Address: City: State: Zip: Telephone: Fax: 1. Which of the following characterizes your computing environment? Check all that apply ( ) Host/terminal ( ) Client/Server ( ) Networked PCs ( ) PCs without LAN If you check Client/Server or Networked PCs in question 1, please answer the following questions. Otherwise, skip to question 11. Note: Questions 2 through 5 seek to differentiate between LAN backbone(s) and attached networks AT THIS SITE. 2. NUMBER OF MAJOR LAN BACKBONES, a backbone being defined as a high- speed link joining together several networks which may or may not run the same protocols: 3. For this (these) backbone(s), how many support ( ) a single common protocol (TCP/IP, IPX/SPX, AppleTalk, X.25, DecNet, OSI, SNA, etc.) present protocol: planned protocol: ( ) multiple protocols present protocols: planned protocols: 4. NUMBER OF MAJOR NETWORKS, a network being defined as a group of desktop computers running the same protocol and connected by the same physical media present: planned: 5. On how many of the above networks are you running each of the following? ( ) TCP/IP ( ) Novell IPX/SPX ( ) AppleTalk ( ) X.25 ( ) DecNet ( ) MAP/TOP ( ) OSI ( ) SNA ( ) Other 6. If you are running different protocols on different networks, do they communicate with each other via routers (Yes/No/Some do, some don't) ? present: planned: 7. LAN ENVIRONMENT (4M/16M Token Ring, Ethernet thick/thin/10BaseT /twist, StarLan, ArcNet, LocalTalk, X.25, FDDI, ATM, Frame Relay, etc.) present: planned: 8. LAN Network Management Platforms (IBM NetView, SunNet, HP OpenView, DEC EMA, etc.) present: planned: 9. Server Operating Systems (Novell Netware, Microsoft Lan Manager, MAC O/S, LAN Server--IBM, PC LAN Program--IBM, Vines--Banyan, UNIX--Solaris 1, 2.x, 4.x, HP, DEC, BSD, AT&T, DEC PathWorks, 3Com--3+, 3+Open, etc.) present: planned: 10. Server Platform(s) (HP, Sun, IBM, Apple, DEC, SGI, Other) present: planned: 11. Estimate number of desktop computers at your location present: planned: 12. PRESENT Desktop Operating Systems (Estimate percentages) ( ) Apple System 7 ( ) Prior Apple Systems ( ) MS Windows ( ) DOS only ( ) Windows NT ( ) OS/2 ( ) UNIX ( ) Other: 13. PLANNED Desktop Operating Systems (Estimate percentages) ( ) Apple System 7 ( ) Prior Apple Systems ( ) MS Windows ( ) DOS only ( ) Windows NT ( ) OS/2 ( ) UNIX ( ) Other: 14. E-Mail Software Applications (Microsoft Mail, CC: Mail, SMTP, SendMail, etc.) present: planned: 15. FUTURE plans for desktop multimedia capabilities (fill limited/fairly extensive/widespread penetration) sound: video capture: fax/modem: voice recording: voice recognition: other: Thanks, everyone one of these gets me closer to freedom! ------------------------------ From: SAILER@ucsvax.ucs.umass.edu (DONALD R SAILER) Subject: Re: Is This Legal? Date: 10 Aug 1993 13:17:40 GMT Organization: UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS - AMHERST In padwad@psd.gs.com writes: > They also have an interesting system for billing calls ... any call > that is chargeable (not "local" based upon the phone's calling plan) > requires the input of your PIN. This allows making long-distance > calls from other people's rooms, and also (they say) helps avoid > roommate squabbles over phone charges, since everyone gets their own > bill. It also opens a huge avenue for fraud (figure ~6.5k students, 5 > digit PIN ... shouldn't take too many guesses), but now that the > University runs the phones, phone fraud is a University offense, and > grounds to be "required to withdraw". We have a similar policy here at the University of Massachusetts and when we switched from billing to the phone to billing the individual a few years ago, our students applauded the move; they do not get into the hassles with roomates over the phone bill anymore. Some universities use 'station specific' authorization codes so a code works from only one phone. This is more secure, but more inconvenient for the students. Even if the number is guessed, the SMDR (Station Message Detail Record) includes the phone number of the phone used to place the call. Most places have no 'public' student phones, so it is fairly easy to track down a hacker. At UMass, it is also a violation of the code of student conduct to use someone elses auth code. I believe Harvard is using New England Telephone Centrex service. It can seem almost like a PBX, even for students. Randy Sailer University of Massachusetts Randy.Sailer@OCIS.UMass.edu ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Aug 93 11:19:52 EDT From: Bonnie J Johnson Subject: Re: Is This Legal? I've been away for a couple of days and will try to answer some more of the questions which have come in on the issue of equal access. One person stated that he was told by the telecom office that certain "buildings" don't need to provide equal access, and they point to hotels, prisons, etc.. "Universities are in the same class as hotels, airport phones and we ARE, by FCC definition, aggreators". We (colleges and universities) must provide equal access. Some schools because of older switch technologie were given more time than others to comply with equal access. If some schools, by older switch design can not provide basic 10xxxx access, they CAN provide basically the same freedom by obtaining the 800 number for major carriers and advertising that number to its customers, i.e. faculty, staff and students. Right after the ruling came down, good old AT&T sent a message to the higher ed institutions offering to "make them compliant for free". I suspect, don't know for sure, that their 800 number access to LD was the way they were going to accomplish this. The guy who wrote from Harvard and said the telecom Director told him the new ruling wouln't require them to do anything just might want to give the telcom director a copy of the FCC ruling. Concerning his switch, and dialing 9 to get out, this has less to do with the ability to provide 10xxxx than does the switch type, i.e. 4600 gtd, 5ESS, Intel, DMS, so forth. For those individuals who say they don't have 10xxxx, ask the telecom department for the 800's for access to the major carriers. If anyone else wants a copy of the FCC ruling, give me your snailmail address. [Moderator's Note: Bonnie, would you want to just send that FCC ruling along for inclusion here? I would print it, and everyone involved could give it to their telecom departments. Have you an easy way to get the file on line and to the Digest? PAT] ------------------------------ From: mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) Subject: Re: Is This Legal? Date: 10 Aug 1993 11:32:06 -0400 Organization: The Programmers' Pit Stop, Ann Arbor MI padwad@psd.gs.com (Danny Padwa) writes: > I know that Columbia has a similar policy of billing a person, rather > than a phone, for LD calls. Is this common? Carnegie Mellon has a similar setup. According to the information I've received so far, telephone service is provided through a Centrex, with long-distance provide by ACUS (AT&T College and University Systems). Internal numbers are dialed with the five-digit Centrex extension number. Outside local calls are 9 + 7D. Long-distance calls are 9 + NPA + 7D, followed by your eight-digit PSC (Personal Security Code). Calls are billed by PSC, not by line. Interestingly enough, the materials I've gotten mention in several places that I shouldn't sign up for calling plans like Reach Out America or Reach Out World, because they "are not compatible with [the] campus telephone service". There are also no mentions of equal-access; it will be interesting to see if 9 + 10XXX + 1 + NPA + 7D works like it should. Marc Unangst, N8VRH mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us ------------------------------ From: floyd@hayes.ims.alaska.edu (Floyd Davidson) Subject: Re: LORAN -- LOng Range Aid to Navigation Organization: University of Alaska Computer Network Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 07:27:18 GMT In article wollman@trantor.emba.uvm. edu (Garrett Wollman) writes: > In article , Bert Roseberry Eisner.DECUS.Org> wrote: >> LORAN stands for LOng Range Aid to Navigation. > Just to get a bit of telecom relevance here, one interesting thing > about the LORAN system is that it can be used to derive a very > accurate time signal. Dave Mills and crew at the University of > Delaware have actually developed a timekeeper that listens to a LORAN > chain and provides a very precise timecode which can then be injected > into the NTP matrix to provide global time service. For many years now the LORAN-C station at Tok, Alaska has been the source for syncronizing the station clock at the Fairbank Toll Center. For the past two years it has been the secondary source but before that is was primary for at least a dozen years. The equipment we use to obtain a time base takes up most of a six foot rack, and is all fairly old technology by today's standards. But this piece of equipment worked without flaw for about a decade. And then one day it failed ... red lights, bong-bong alarms, the whole bit. And our old superviser (since retired, bless his heart) was quickly on the spot, looking things over, and like all the rest of us that had no idea how it worked: we were all dumbfounded. But then, we heard (distinctly! I heard it myself!) "Who went to school on this thing?" I just happened to be facing the a direction where the door to the parking lot was visible. I swear, honest, that when someone said "Doug!", that I saw Doug, with coat in hand heading through the door about as fast as he could move! The boss never did find out what happened, but Doug ain't no dummy. He had been to school on it when it was installed and ten years later had no more idea than anyone what to do with it. The boss was going to expect him to fix it NOW. Not finding him, it was ok if the rest of us took awhile to figure it out and fix it slowly in an hour or so. Darn thing has been breaking every six months since then ... Floyd floyd@ims.alaska.edu A guest on the Institute of Marine Science computer Salcha, Alaska system at the University of Alaska at Fairbanks. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1993 14:20:46 +0200 From: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org (Christian Weisgerber) Reply-To: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org Subject: Re: An Experience With the AT&T Language Line In is written: > Several weeks ago I phoned the AT&T Language Line and asked for some > details about their service. The marketing rep told me about their > 140 languages available 24 hours/day, and offered to mail me some ^^^ Does anybody have a list of those available? 140 languages sounds like a lot to cover the globe ... I mean, we're talking about business languages here, aren't we? I took a look at a map of Europe and started writing down languages, came up with about forty and there's probably a dozen more (depending on where you draw the European border probably dozens). Although I don't think there would be much need for having an interpreter for, say, Provencal or Frisian. Let's say about 30-35 languages for Europe ... that still leaves a lot for Africa and Asia. Hmm. Do we have readers in those parts of the world, who could comment? Christian 'naddy' Weisgerber, Germany naddy@ruessel.sub.org ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Aug 93 23:25 EDT From: djcl@io.org (woody) Subject: Telecomics - Just Like a COCOT Today's episode of the Ernie comic started with someone with a broken vehicle wanting to use the phone in the "Piranha Club", an association dedicated to sleazy tactics for those not familiar with the running gags of this strip. The punch line (!spoiler!) in the last panel, where the "payphone" is, goes: A: "How does this thing work?" B: "Two plums and a watermelon or three cherries and your call goes through." (What's so phunny about a standard Las Vegas COCOT? :-)) David Leibold ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #560 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa27729; 11 Aug 93 2:09 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA04778 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Tue, 10 Aug 1993 23:49:43 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA09032 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Tue, 10 Aug 1993 23:49:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 23:49:06 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308110449.AA09032@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #561 TELECOM Digest Tue, 10 Aug 93 23:49:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 561 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Internet to Commercial E-Mail (Mike King) Re: Internet to Commercial E-Mail (dbuerger@cup.portal.com) Re: Internet to Commercial E-Mail (Stan Hall) Inter-Network Mail Guide (was Re: Internet to Commercial) (Many Readers) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 93 18:06:29 EDT From: mking@fsd.com (Mike King) Subject: Re: Internet to Commercial E-Mail In TELECOM Digest, V13 #555, schallenberg@attmail.com (Van H. Schallenberg) wrote: > Has anyone ever developed a list of the formats necessary to send > internet electronic mail to commercial electronic mail services? If Use anonymous ftp and connect to csd4.csd.uwm.edu. Scott Yanoff has collected many different inter-service formats into a document called internetwork-mail-guide in the directory /pub. The latest version I have is dated 8/1/93. Scott also creates the excellent "SPECIAL INTERNET CONNECTIONS" list (inet.services.txt in the same directory) which he updates every two weeks. It's a great resource for finding stuff on the 'net. The latest is 8/2/93. Finger yanoff@csd4.csd.uwm.edu for further information. Mike King * Software Sourcerer * Fairchild Space * +1 301.428.5384 mking@fsd.com or 73710.1430@compuserve.com * (usual disclaimers) [Moderator's Note: Actually, he won't have to FTP, nor will any readers since I have attached the file at the end of this issue. PAT] ------------------------------ From: dbuerger@cup.portal.com Subject: Re: Internet to Commercial E-Mail Date: Mon, 9 Aug 93 06:56:52 PDT For instructions on sending email between various commercial services (i.e. how to get the addressing syntax right), see David Strom's article, "How to Make E-Mail Gateways Work," Network Computing, January 1992, p. 83 and 86. ------------------------------ Subject: Internet to Commercial E-Mail From: kilgore@wuntvor.pillar.com (Stan Hall) Date: Mon, 09 Aug 93 10:58:13 CDT Organization: The Eternal Apprentice BBS, Oklahoma City, Ok u951007@unx.ucc.okstate.edu (u951007) writes: > Has anyone ever developed a list of the formats necessary to send > internet electronic mail to commercial electronic mail services? If There are two lists that I know of. The first one is maintained by Scott Yanoff (yanoff@csd4.csd.uwm.edu) and is posted at least once a month to the folling newsgroups: comp.mail.misc, alt.bbs.lists, alt.internet.services, comp.misc, news.answers The subject heading is: Subject: Updated Inter-Network Mail Guide The second list is the "Internet Mailing Guide" maintained by Ajay Shekhawat (ajay@cs.Buffalo.EDU). The latest version I have is dated 04/15/1992 (Version 1.2). If anyone is interested in either of these lists I will be happy to send a copy via email. kilgore@wuntvor.pillar.com (Stan Hall) The Eternal Apprentice BBS, Oklahoma City, OK -- +1 405 942 8794 [Moderator's Note: People may want to see the guide by Ajay, but the other one is attached next in this issue so all the mailing list people can have a copy as well. PAT] ------------------------------ From: Several Readers Subject: Inter-Network Mail Guide (was Re: Internet to Commercial E-Mail) Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 20:24:56 CDT [Moderator's Note: We have a copy of this in our archives although not as recent as the version attached below. My thanks to the dozen of you who sent this identical posting to my attention today. No names are needed, you all know who you are. Thanks to all. PAT] * INTER-NETWORK MAIL GUIDE: Last Update: 8/1/93 * Further modifications and (C) 1993 by Scott Yanoff (yanoff@csd4.csd.uwm.edu) Inter-Network Mail Guide - Original Copyright (C) 1992 by John J. Chew This guide is available via anonymous ftp to: csd4.csd.uwm.edu INTRODUCTION This file documents methods of sending mail from one network to another. It represents the aggregate knowledge of the readers of comp.mail.misc and many contributors elsewhere. If you know of any corrections or additions to this file, please follow the instructions in the section entitled 'HOW TO FORMAT INFORMATION FOR SUBMISSION' and then mail the information to me: Scott A. Yanoff . HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE If you just want to browse the guide manually for information, this is what you need to know. The guide is organized as a list of entries. Each entry tells you how to get from one network to another. Here is what a typical entry might look like: #FROM: mynet #TO: yournet #RECIPIENT: youraddress #CONTACT: contactaddress #INSTR: send to 'youraddress@thegateway' This means that to send mail FROM a network called 'mynet' TO a RECIPIENT address 'youraddress' on a network called 'yournet', you should follow the INSTRUCTIONS shown and address your mail to 'youraddress@thegateway'. Names and descriptions of the possible FROM and TO fields: N: aol ; America Online; America Online, Inc.; commercial; N: applelink ; AppleLink; Apple Computer, Inc.; in-house; N: arcom ; X.400; ?; ?; N: att ; AT&T Mail; AT&T; commercial; N: bitnet ; BITNET; none; academic; N: bix ; Byte Information eXchange; Byte magazine; commercial; N: bmug ; ? ; Berkeley Macintosh Users Group; in-house; N: compuserve ; CompuServe; CompuServe Inc.; commercial; N: connect ; Connect Professional Information Network; ?; commercial; N: easylink ; Easylink; AT&T; commercial; N: easynet ; Easynet; DEC; in-house; N: envoy ; Envoy-100; Telecom Canada; commercial; X.400 N: fax ; Facsimile document transmission; none; none; N: fidonet ; FidoNet; none; bbs; N: genie ; GEnie; GE Information Services; commercial; N: geonet ; GeoNet Mailbox Systems; - Geonet Mailbox Services GmbH/Systems Inc.; commercial; N: gold-400 ; GNS Gold 400; British Telecom; commercial; X.400 N: goldgate ; GoldGate Telcom Gold; Net-Tel Computer Systems; ?; N: greennet ; GreenNet; Soft Solutions Ltd; commercial; N: gsfcmail ; GSFCmail; NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center; in-house; N: ibm ; VNET; IBM; in-house; N: internet ; Internet; none; academic; N: keylink ; KeyLink; Telecom Australia; commercial; X.400 N: mailnet ; X.400; ?; ?; N: mausnet ; Mausnet; Mausnet; non-profit; N: mci ; MCIMail; MCI; commercial; N: nasamail ; NASAMail; NASA; in-house; N: nsi ; NASA Science Internet; NASA; government; - Dual-protocol: instructions given here pertain only to NSI-DECnet addresses - (NSI-TCP/IP addresses should be treated as shown for 'internet') N: omnet ; OMNET; OMNET; commercial; N: peacenet ; PeaceNet; Institute for Global Communications; - non-profit; N: prodigy ; PRODIGY; commercial; ?; N: sinet ; Schlumberger Information NETwork; ?; ?; N: sprintmail ; SprintMail; Sprint; commercial; formerly Telemail N: thenet ; Texas Higher Education Network; University of Texas; - academic ; N: wwivnet ; WWIVnet; WWIVnet; non-profit; The 'RECIPIENT' record gives an example of an address on the destination network, to make it clear in subsequent lines what text requires subsitution. The 'CONTACT' record gives an address for inquiries concerning the gateway, expressed as an address reachable from the source (#FROM:) network. Presumably, if you can't get the gateway to work at all, then knowing an unreachable address on another network will not be of great help. The 'INSTR' records, of which there may be several, give verbal instructions to a user of the source network to let them send mail to a user on the destination network. Text that needs to be typed will appear in double quotes, with C-style escapes if necessary. If the instructions consist simply of mailing to a certain address, this will be indicated by the words 'send to' followed by a quoted address. If there are alternative addresses, they will be marked 'or to' instead. HOW TO FORMAT INFORMATION FOR SUBMISSION Here is what I really want in the way of information. If you are adding a new network to the list, tell me what its official name is (pay attention to capitalization), what the name of its responsible organization is, and what kind of a network it is (academic, commercial, government, in-house or non-profit). If this isn't clear, look at the examples above. For each connection, give me an entry that looks something like: #FROM: foonet #TO: barnet #RECIPIENT: baraddress #CONTACT: contactaddress #INSTR: send to 'baraddress@thegateway' Note that 'contactaddress' must be an address expressed in foonet's native format, and not that of barnet, since if a user is having trouble accessing barnet, giving him/her an address on that net to contact for help is not productive. If there is no contact/postmaster address, please tell me. If there are more complicated instructions, use additional #INSTR: lines. Once you've got all the information together, send it to me in an e-mail message with the words 'INMG update' in the Subject: line. You can in general expect an answer back from me within a week. #FROM: aol #TO: applelink #RECIPIENT: user #CONTACT: Internet #INSTR: send to 'user@applelink' #FROM: aol #TO: compuserve #RECIPIENT: 71234,567 #CONTACT: Internet #INSTR: send to '71234.567@cis' #FROM: aol #TO: genie #RECIPIENT: user #CONTACT: Internet #INSTR: send to 'user@genie' #FROM: aol #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #CONTACT: Internet #INSTR: send to 'user@domain' #FROM: applelink #TO: bitnet #RECIPIENT: user@site #INSTR: send to 'user@site.bitnet@internet#' #FROM: applelink #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #INSTR: send to 'user@domain@internet#' (address must be < 35 characters) #FROM: arcom #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: fred@Domain.dd.uu.us #INSTR: send to C=CH,A=ARCOM,P=SWITCH,ORG=us,OU1=uu,OU2=dd,OU3=Domain,S=fred #FROM: att #TO: bitnet #RECIPIENT: user@site #INSTR: send to 'internet!site.bitnet!user' #FROM: att #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #INSTR: send to 'internet!domain!user' #FROM: bitnet #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #INSTR: Methods for sending mail from Bitnet to the Internet vary depending on #- what mail software is running at the Bitnet site in question. In the #- best case, users should simply be able to send mail to 'user@domain'. #- If this doesn't work, try 'user%domain@gateway' where 'gateway' is a #- Bitnet-Internet gateway site nearby. Finally, if neither of these #- works, you may have to try hand-coding an SMTP envelope for your mail. #FROM: compuserve #TO: fax #RECIPIENT: +1 415 555 1212 #INSTR: send to '>FAX 14155551212' #INSTR: not transitive - message must originate from a CompuServe user #INSTR: for calls outside the NANP, use '011' as the international prefix #FROM: compuserve #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #INSTR: send to 'INTERNET:user@domain' (only from CompuServe users) #FROM: compuserve #TO: mci #RECIPIENT: 123-4567 #INSTR: send to '>MCIMAIL:123-4567' (only from CompuServe users) #FROM: connect #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #INSTR: send to 'DASN' #- and set the first line of message: '"user@domain"@DASN' #FROM: easynet #TO: bitnet #RECIPIENT: user@site #CONTACT: DECWRL::ADMIN #INSTR: send to 'nm%DECWRL::"user@site.bitnet"' (from VMS using NMAIL) #INSTR: send to 'user@site.bitnet' (from Ultrix) #INSTR: or to 'user%site.bitnet@decwrl.dec.com' (from Ultrix via IP) #INSTR: or to 'DECWRL::"user@site.bitnet"' (from Ultrix via DECN) #FROM: easynet #TO: fidonet #RECIPIENT: john smith at 1:2/3.4 #CONTACT: DECWRL::ADMIN #INSTR: send to 'nm%DECWRL::"john.smith@p4.f3.n2.z1.fidonet.org"' #- (from VMS using NMAIL) #INSTR: send to 'john.smith@p4.f3.n2.z1.fidonet.org' #- (from Ultrix) #INSTR: or to '"john.smith%p4.f3.n2.z1.fidonet.org"@decwrl.dec.com' #- (from Ultrix via IP) #INSTR: or to 'DECWRL::"john.smith@p4.f3.n2.z1.fidonet.org"' #- (from Ultrix via DECN) #FROM: easynet #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #CONTACT: DECWRL::ADMIN #INSTR: send to 'nm%DECWRL::"user@domain"' (from VMS using NMAIL) #INSTR: send to 'user@domain' (from Ultrix) #INSTR: or to 'user%domain@decwrl.dec.com' (from Ultrix via IP) #INSTR: or to 'DECWRL::"user@domain"' (from Ultrix via DECN) #INSTR: or to 'user@domain @Internet' (using ALL-IN-1) #FROM: envoy #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #CONTACT: ICS.TEST or ICS.BOARD #INSTR: send to '[RFC-822="user(a)domain"]INTERNET/TELEMAIL/US' #INSTR: for special characters, use @=(a), !=(b), _=(u), #INSTR: any=(three octal digits) #FROM: fidonet #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@machine.site.domain #INSTR: convert to 'user@machine.site.domain ON 1:1/31 #FROM: fidonet #TO: wwivnet #RECIPIENT: number@node #CONTACT: Kevin C. ON 1:100/215 #INSTR: convert to '#number @node ON 1:100/215' #INSTR: WWIVgate; LOW TRAFFIC SITE, USE SPARINGLY.. Gateway is modem-based, #- they absorb cost of long distance connects to pick-up and deliver. #- Keep messages under 10K, use infrequently, do NOT use mail-lists or #- file/list-server commands. #FROM: genie #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #CONTACT: postmaster@genie.geis.com #INSTR: send to user@domain@INET# #FROM: geonet #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #INSTR: send to 'DASN' #INSTR: set subject line to 'user@domain!subject' #FROM: gold-400 #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@host #INSTR: send to '/DD.RFC-822=user(a)host/O=uknet/PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=GB/' #INSTR: for special characters, use @=(a), %=(p), !=(b), "=(q) #FROM: gsfcmail #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #CONTACT: cust.svc #INSTR: send to '(SITE:SMTPMAIL,ID:)' #INSTR: or to '(C:USA,A:TELEMAIL,P:SMTPMAIL,ID:)' #INSTR: or send to 'POSTMAN' #- and set the first line of message to 'To: user@domain' #INSTR: Help is also available by phoning +1 800 858 9947. #FROM: gsfcmail #TO: nsi #RECIPIENT: host::user #CONTACT: cust.svc #INSTR: send to '(SITE:SMTPMAIL,ID:)' #INSTR: or to '(C:USA,A:TELEMAIL,P:SMTPMAIL,ID:)' #INSTR: or send to 'POSTMAN' #- and set the first line of message to 'To: user@host.DN.NASA.GOV' #FROM: internet #TO: aol #RECIPIENT: A User #CONTACT: postmaster@aol.com #INSTR: send to auser@aol.com (all lower-case, remove spaces) #INSTR: msgs are truncated to 32K (8K for PCs), all characters except newline #- & printable ASCII characters are mapped to spaces, users are limited to #- 75 pieces of Internet mail in their mailbox at a time. #FROM: internet #TO: applelink #RECIPIENT: user #INSTR: send to 'user@applelink.apple.com' #FROM: internet #TO: arcom #RECIPIENT: (G:John, I:Q., S:Smith, OU:ORG_UNIT, O:Org, P:PRMD, A:ADMD, C:CA) #INSTR: send to: #- /G=John/I=Q/S=Smith/OU=ORG_UNIT/O=Org/P=PRMD/A=ADMD/C=CA@chx400.switch.ch #FROM: internet #TO: att #RECIPIENT: user #INSTR: send to 'user@attmail.com' #FROM: internet #TO: bitnet #RECIPIENT: user@site #INSTR: send to 'user%site.bitnet@gateway' where 'gateway' is a gateway host #- that is on both the internet and bitnet. Some examples of gateways #- are: cunyvm.cuny.edu mitvma.mit.edu. Check first to see what local #- policies are concerning inter-network forwarding. #FROM: internet #TO: bix #RECIPIENT: user #INSTR: send to 'user@bix.com' #FROM: internet #TO: bmug #RECIPIENT: John Smith #INSTR: send to 'John.Smith@bmug.fidonet.org' #FROM: internet #TO: compuserve #RECIPIENT: 71234,567 #INSTR: send to '71234.567@CompuServe.com' #INSTR: Ordinary Compuserve account IDs are pairs of octal numbers #FROM: internet #TO: compuserve #RECIPIENT: organization:department:user #INSTR: send to 'user@department.organization.compuserve.com' #INSTR: This syntax is for use with members of organizations which have a #- private CompuServe mail area. 'department' may not always be present. #FROM: internet #TO: connect #RECIPIENT: NAME #INSTR: send to 'NAME@connectinc.com' #FROM: internet #TO: easylink #RECIPIENT: user mail number 1234567 #INSTR: send to: 1234567@eln.attmail.com #FROM: internet #TO: easynet #RECIPIENT: HOST::USER #CONTACT: admin@decwrl.dec.com #INSTR: send to 'user@host.enet.dec.com' #INSTR: or to 'user%host.enet@decwrl.dec.com' #FROM: internet #TO: easynet #RECIPIENT: John Smith @ABC #CONTACT: admin@decwrl.dec.com #INSTR: send to 'John.Smith@ABC.MTS.DEC.COM' #INSTR: this syntax is for sending mail to ALL-IN-1 users #FROM: internet #TO: envoy #RECIPIENT: John Smith (ID=userid) #INSTR: send to 'uunet.uu.net!att!attmail!mhs!envoy!userid' #FROM: internet #TO: envoy #RECIPIENT: John Smith (ID=userid) #CONTACT: /C=CA/ADMD=TELECOM.CANADA/ID=ICS.TEST/S=TEST_GROUP/@nasamail.nasa.gov #INSTR: send to #INSTR: '/C=CA/ADMD=TELECOM.CANADA/DD.ID=userid/PN=John_Smith/@Sprint.COM' #FROM: internet #TO: fidonet #RECIPIENT: john smith at 1:2/3.4 #INSTR: send to 'john.smith@p4.f3.n2.z1.fidonet.org' #FROM: internet #TO: genie #RECIPIENT: user #CONTACT: postmaster@genie.geis.com #INSTR: send to user@genie.geis.com #FROM: internet #TO: geonet #RECIPIENT: user at host #INSTR: send to 'user:host@map.das.net' #INSTR: or to 'user@host.geomail.org' (known to work for geo2) #INSTR: known hosts: geo1 (Europe), geo2 (UK), geo4 (USA) #FROM: internet #TO: gold-400 #RECIPIENT: (G:John, I:Q, S:Smith, OU: org_unit, O:organization, PRMD:prmd) #INSTR: send to 'john.q.smith@org_unit.org.prmd.gold-400.gb' #INSTR: or to #- '"/G=John/I=Q/S=Smith/OU=org_unit/O=org/PRMD=prmd/ADMD=gold 400/C=GB/" #- @mhs-relay.ac.uk' #FROM: internet #TO: goldgate #RECIPIENT: 10087:CQQ061 #INSTR: send to '10087.CQQ061@goldgate.ac.uk' #INSTR: or to '/G=10087/S=CQQ061/P=uk.ac/O=GoldGate/C=GB/' #FROM: internet #TO: greennet #RECIPIENT: user #CONTACT: support@gn.apc.org #INSTR: user@gn.apc.org (or user@gn.uucp if mailing from JANET) #FROM: internet #TO: gsfcmail #RECIPIENT: user #CONTACT: naic@nasa.gov #INSTR: send to 'user@gsfcmail.nasa.gov' #INSTR: or to '/PN=user/ADMD=TELEMAIL/PRMD=GSFC/O=GSFCMAIL/C=US/ #- @x400.msfc.nasa.gov' #FROM: internet #TO: ibm #RECIPIENT: user@vmnode.tertiary_domain (syntax?) #CONTACT: nic@vnet.ibm.com #INSTR: send to 'user@vmnode.tertiary_domain.ibm.com' #INSTR: To look up a user's mailbox name, mail to nic@vnet.ibm.com with #- the line 'WHOIS name' in the message body. #FROM: internet #TO: keylink #RECIPIENT: (G:John, I:Q, S:Smith, O:MyOrg, A:Telememo, C:au) #CONTACT: aarnet@aarnet.edu.au #INSTR: send to John.Q.Smith@MyOrg.telememo.au #INSTR: for keylink Private Mail Domains such as #INSTR: (G:John, S:Smith, O:MyDept, P:AusGov, A:Telememo, C:au) #INSTR: send to John.Smith@MyDept.AusGov.telememo.au #FROM: internet #TO: mausnet #RECIPIENT: hans schmidt @ box #CONTACT: sysop@k2.maus.de #INSTR: send to 'hans_schmidt@box.maus.de' #FROM: internet #TO: mci #RECIPIENT: John Smith (123-4567) #INSTR: send to '1234567@mcimail.com' #INSTR: or to 'JSmith@mcimail.com' (if 'JSmith' is unique) #INSTR: or to 'John_Smith@mcimail.com' (if 'John Smith' is unique - note the #- underscore!) #INSTR: or to 'John_Smith/1234567@mcimail.com' (if 'John Smith' is NOT unique) #FROM: internet #TO: nasamail #RECIPIENT: user #CONTACT: naic@nasa.gov #INSTR: send to 'user@nasamail.nasa.gov' #INSTR: Help is available by phoning +1 205 544 1771 or +1 800 858 9947. #FROM: internet #TO: nsi #RECIPIENT: host::user #CONTACT: naic@nasa.gov #INSTR: send to 'user@host.dnet.nasa.gov' #INSTR: or to 'user%host.dnet@ames.arc.nasa.gov' #INSTR: or to 'user%host.dnet@east.gsfc.nasa.gov' #INSTR: Help is also available by phoning +1 800 858 9947. #FROM: internet #TO: omnet #RECIPIENT: user #CONTACT: naic@nasa.gov #INSTR: send to 'user@omnet.nasa.gov' #INSTR: or to 'user/omnet@omnet.nasa.gov' (?) #INSTR: or to '/DD.UN=user/O=OMN/ADMD=TELEMAIL/C=US/@Sprint.COM' #INSTR: Help is available by phoning +1 800 858 9947 #FROM: internet #TO: peacenet #RECIPIENT: user #CONTACT: support@igc.org #INSTR: send to 'user@cdp.igc.org' #FROM: internet #TO: prodigy #RECIPIENT: user #CONTACT: admin@prodigy.com #INSTR: send to 'user@prodigy.com' For example: abcd12a@prodigy.com #- Please note that this service is still currently being tested! #FROM: internet #TO: sinet #RECIPIENT: node::user or node1::node::user #INSTR: send to 'user@node.SINet.SLB.COM' #INSTR: or to 'user%node@node1.SINet.SLB.COM' #FROM: internet #TO: sprintmail #RECIPIENT: John Smith at SomeOrganization #INSTR: send to #- '/G=John/S=Smith/O=SomeOrganization/ADMD=TELEMAIL/C=US/@Sprint.COM' #FROM: internet #TO: thenet #RECIPIENT: user@host #INSTR: send to 'user%host.decnet@utadnx.cc.utexas.edu' #FROM: internet #TO: wwivnet #RECIPIENT: number@node #CONTACT: faq-request@tfsquad.mn.org or bryen@tfsquad.mn.org #INSTR: convert to 'number-node@wwiv.tfsquad.mn.org' #INSTR: WWCPgate; LOW TRAFFIC SITE, USE SPARINGLY.. Gateway is modem-based, #- they absorb cost of long distance connects to pick-up and deliver. #- Keep messages under 10K, use infrequently, do NOT use mail-lists or #- file/list-server commands. #FROM: keylink #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: John Smith #CONTACT: (G:CUSTOMER, S:SERVICE, O:CUST.SERVICE, P:telememo, C:au) #INSTR: send to '(C:au, A:telememo, P:oz.au, "RFC-822":"John Smith #- ")' #INSTR: special characters must be mapped: @->(a), %->(p), !->(b), "->(q) #FROM: mausnet #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #CONTACT: sysop@k2 #INSTR: send to 'user@domain' #FROM: mci #TO: compuserve #RECIPIENT: John Smith (71234,567) #CONTACT: 267-1163 (MCI Help) #INSTR: at the 'To:' prompt type 'John Smith (EMS)' #INSTR: at the 'EMS:' prompt type 'compuserve' #INSTR: at the 'Mbx:' prompt type '71234,567' #FROM: mci #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: John Smith #CONTACT: 267-1163 (MCI Help) #INSTR: at the 'To:' prompt type 'John Smith (EMS)' #INSTR: at the 'EMS:' prompt type 'INTERNET' #INSTR: at the 'Mbx:' prompt type 'user@domain' #FROM: nasamail #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #CONTACT: admin #INSTR: send to '(site:smtpmail,id:)' #INSTR: Help is also available by phoning +1 205 544 1771 and at 'admin/nasa'. #FROM: nasamail #TO: nsi #RECIPIENT: host::user #CONTACT: admin #INSTR: send to '(site:smtpmail,id:)' #INSTR: Help is also available by phoning +1 205 544 1771 and at 'admin/nasa'. #FROM: nsi #TO: gsfcmail #RECIPIENT: user #CONTACT: naic@nasa.gov #INSTR: send to 'east::"user@gsfcmail.nasa.gov"' #INSTR: or to 'east::"/PN=user/ADMD=TELEMAIL/PRMD=GSFC/O=GSFCMAIL/C=US/ #- @x400.msfc.nasa.gov' #INSTR: Help is also available by phoning +1 800 858 9947. #FROM: nsi #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #CONTACT: east::"naic@nasa.gov" #INSTR: send to 'east::"user@domain"' #INSTR: or to 'dftnic::"user@domain"' #INSTR: or to 'nssdca::in%"user@domain"' #INSTR: or to 'jpllsi::"user@domain"' #INSTR: Help is also available by phoning +1 800 858 9947. #FROM: nsi #TO: omnet #RECIPIENT: user #CONTACT: omnet.service #INSTR: send to 'east::"user@omnet.nasa.gov"' #INSTR: Help also available by phoning +1 617 244 4333 (OMN customers only) #FROM: nsi #TO: sprintmail #RECIPIENT: John Smith at SomeOrganization #CONTACT: east::"naic@nasa.gov" #INSTR: send to #- '/G=John/S=Smith/O=SomeOrganization/ADMD=TELEMAIL/C=US/@Sprint.COM' #INSTR: Help is also available by phoning +1 800 858 9947. #FROM: omnet #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #CONTACT: omnet.service #INSTR: Enter 'compose manual' at the command prompt. Choose the Internet #- address option from the menu that appears. Note that this gateway #- service charges based on the number of 1000-character blocks sent. #INSTR: Help also available by phoning +1 617 244 4333 (OMN customers only). #FROM: sinet #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #INSTR: send to 'M_MAILNOW::M_INTERNET::"user@domain"' #INSTR: or to 'M_MAILNOW::M_INTERNET::domain::user' #FROM: sprintmail #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #INSTR: send to '(C:USA,A:TELEMAIL,P:INTERNET,"RFC-822":) DEL' #INSTR: Help available within the United States by phoning +1 800 336 0437 and #- pressing '2' on a TouchTone phone. #FROM: sprintmail #TO: nsi #RECIPIENT: host::user #INSTR: send to #- '(C:USA,A:TELEMAIL,P:INTERNET,"RFC-822":) DEL' #INSTR: Help available within the United States by phoning +1 800 336 0437 and #- pressing '2' on a TouchTone phone. #FROM: thenet #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@domain #INSTR: send to 'UTADNX::WINS%" user@domain "' #FROM: wwivnet #TO: fidonet #RECIPIENT: First Last ON zone:node/fnet #CONTACT: 1@3469 #INSTR: convert to 'First Last ON zone:node/fnet @656' #INSTR: WWIVgate; LOW TRAFFIC SITE, USE SPARINGLY.. Gateway is modem-based, #- they absorb cost of long distance connects to pick-up and deliver. #- Keep messages under 10K, use infrequently, do NOT use mail-lists or #- file/list-servers commands. #FROM: wwivnet #TO: internet #RECIPIENT: user@machine.site.domain #CONTACT: faq-request@9702 or 1@9702 #INSTR: convert to 'user#machine.site.domain@506' #- If 'user' begins with digits, begin address with a quote. #INSTR: WWCPgate; LOW TRAFFIC SITE, USE SPARINGLY.. Gateway is modem-based, #- they absorb cost of long distance connects to pick-up and deliver. #- Keep messages under 10K, use infrequently, do NOT use mail-lists or #- file/list-server commands. ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #561 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa02709; 11 Aug 93 23:34 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA21613 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Wed, 11 Aug 1993 20:54:37 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA30185 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Wed, 11 Aug 1993 20:54:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1993 20:54:01 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308120154.AA30185@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #562 TELECOM Digest Wed, 11 Aug 93 20:54:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 562 Inside This Issue: This Concludes 12 Years of It! Re: Is This Legal? (James Olsen) Re: Is This Legal? (Gang Zhou) Re: Is This Legal? (H. Peter Anvin) Re: Valid Card Declared Invalid? (Jon Kimbrough) Re: Valid Card Declared Invalid? (Steve Cogorno) Re: Leftover Drops (Alan Boritz) Re: Leftover Drops (Dave Carpentier) Re: AT&T Spending $5(m) on Video Games (John Schroeder) Re: Caller-ID Across LATAs? (Bob Snyder) Re: Radar Detectors (Eric N. Florack) Re: Sprint Workers Fed Up, Start Unionizing (David Boettger) Re: Radar and Acronyms (M. Otto) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 11:34:47 -0400 From: olsen@hing.LCS.MIT.EDU (James Olsen) Subject: Re: Is This Legal? I summarized the FCC action on call blocking two years ago, when the rules were issued. Full details are available in the Federal Register of August 16, 1991 (vol. 56, no. 159), pages 40793-9 and 40844-7. Here are the main points: - As of March 16, 1992, all operator service providers (OSP's), including AT&T, have to provide "800" or "950" access numbers. - Also as of March 16, 1992, all COCOT's have to unblock 10XXX access code calls. - Also as of March 16, 1992, all non-payphone call aggregators (such as hospitals, hotels, and colleges) must unblock 10XXX calls if their equipment can safely do so. - All aggregator equipment made or imported into the US after April 16, 1992 must unblock 10XXX calls as soon as it is installed. - As of March 16, 1993, all non-payphone call aggregators must unblock 10XXX calls if they can safely do so at a cost of no more than $15.00 per [inside] line. - By April 17, 1997, all call aggregators must unblock 10XXX calls. This means that hotels, colleges, prisons, and similar 'call aggregators' must not block 10XXX access codes unless - Their switching equipment was made or imported before April 16, 1992, and - Their equipment cannot safely unblock 10XXX calls, and - Changing the equipment to safely unblock 10XXX calls would cost more than than $15.00 per inside line. If all three of these criteria are met, then the aggregator has until April 17, 1997 to unblock 10XXX calls. ------------------------------ From: gzhou@pollux.usc.edu (Gang Zhou) Subject: Re: Is This Legal? Date: 11 Aug 1993 10:25:42 -0700 Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA In article Bonnie J Johnson writes: > If some schools, by older switch design can not provide basic 10xxxx USC is setting up the phone system right now, so it must be a new system, but they don't provide basic 10xxxx. > access, they CAN provide basically the same freedom by obtaining the > 800 number for major carriers and advertising that number to its We can use the calling card via the 800 number for major carriers. It seams that USC has done its part of "equal access", right? But it's still not fair, or equal, because calling card bears a surcharge .75/1.75 for every call. Gang ------------------------------ From: hpa (H. Peter Anvin N9ITP) Subject: Re: Is This Legal? Reply-To: hpa@nwu.edu (H. Peter Anvin) Organization: Hierarchial directory structure Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1993 16:45:54 GMT In article of comp.dcom.telecom, padwad@psd.gs.com (Danny Padwa) writes: > I know that Columbia has a similar policy of billing a person, rather > than a phone, for LD calls. Is this common? Northwestern has a similar policy/system. The students here hate it because although the University made a bug fuzz about the "discounts" we would get on long-distance calls, we got our *local* calls hiked to business rate! In Illinois Bell territory that means that even if you are calling across the street you pay a per-minute charge, while residential rates pay a nickel-a-call. They make it even sneakier by sticking the monthly service bill on the University tuition/housing bill that gets sent to the *parents*, so it looks like a bargain on the bill (no monthly charge -- wow) but in fact it is billed differently. My main complaint about the system, however, is that they have licensed AT&T to handle billing. These people are incredible. They shut my phone service off and refused to reinstate it *for a week* because of *their mistake*. Their only excuse was "we are doing billing on your university and our records are unavailable". Uh-huh. hpa INTERNET: hpa@nwu.edu FINGER/TALK: hpa@ahab.eecs.nwu.edu IBM MAIL: 36073 at IBMX400 NeXTMAIL: hpa@speedy.acns.nwu.edu ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Aug 93 13:51:43 EDT From: jkimbro@hercii.lasc.lockheed.com (Jon Kimbrough) Subject: Re: Valid Card Declared Invalid? In article 7@eecs.nwu.edu, our Moderator notes: > [Moderator's Note: Oh? Stuff going through 10xxx is not validated by > the local telco? Then how come when I wanted to change the PIN on my > AT&T Calling Card and had to ask twice to get it done, the second time > the rep at AT&T said "I will send a FAX to Illinois Bell right now and > ask what is the delay in processing this," ?? And how come she later > said IBT had lost the original order to do it? I believe that anything > dialed via 10xxx is first examined -- in its entirety -- by the local > telco, and then is handled, passed to a carrier, treated or whatever. > How come whenever I want to change calling plans or do anything with > my AT&T account the answer is always it will be done whenever Illinois > Bell gets around to it, etc.? PAT] Hey, the people at AT&T aren't stupid! Why take the blame when you can pass it off on someone else? Actually, I can see where changing your calling plan or other _billing_ related issues would be handled through IBT, since, as your local telco, they handle the billing of your AT&T account. Jon Kimbrough jkimbro@lasc.lockheed.com Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein, either stated or implied, are solely my own and do not reflect Lockheed's views in any manner. ------------------------------ From: cogorno@netcom.com (Steve Cogorno) Subject: Re: Valid Card Declared Invalid? Date: Tue, 10 Aug 93 22:55:54 PDT > Stuff going through 10xxx is not verified by the local telco (Once you > get the MCI bong, it's MCI's call). Some LD companies, for whatever > reason, elect to only accept LEC cards on their 10XXX access. But > it't strictly up to them. I believe AT&T will accept its card or an > LEC card on their 10288. > [Moderator's Note: Oh? Stuff going through 10xxx is not validated by > the local telco? Then how come when I wanted to change the PIN on my > AT&T Calling Card and had to ask twice to get it done, the second time > the rep at AT&T said "I will send a FAX to Illinois Bell right now and > ask what is the delay in processing this," ?? And how come she later > said IBT had lost the original order to do it? I believe that anything > dialed via 10xxx is first examined -- in its entirety -- by the local > telco, and then is handled, passed to a carrier, treated or whatever. > How come whenever I want to change calling plans or do anything with > my AT&T account the answer is always it will be done whenever Illinois > Bell gets around to it, etc.? PAT] Pat, I am not speaking from experience, but I would think that card numbers are not processed by the local telco because my cardnumber works when I am in NYNEX Territory even though I am a PacBell customer. I suppose the LECs could share the card info, but why would they go through extra work to make this happen when AT&T has the definative lists on their card numbers? AT&T could do it. Steve cogorno@netcom.com ------------------------------ Date: 11 Aug 93 07:53:01 EDT From: Alan Boritz <72446.461@CompuServe.COM> Subject: Re: Leftover Drops mac@rci.chi.il.us (Mark A. Cnota) writes: > There is, and probably always will be, "multiple plant" in most urban > areas. This means that the telco will terminate the same central > office pairs in more than one place, so they can be used at either > depending on where the need is. This is cheaper than providing > everyone with their own separate pairs all the way back to the C.O., > including what you can predict for "future use" which may or may not > ever be used. I don't know about you, but I don't have party-line service here. Since I pay for individual line service I expect performance equal to, or better than, that of any other individual line subscriber. If NJ Bell has any bridge-taps on my circuits they're getting away with it only because I haven't discovered service degradation. > I think we can agree that it's economically unfeasible to send a > technician out to disconnect every unused drop or even to pull a > jumper wire at an interface box or inside terminal when a line is > disconnected. No, I don't think we can agree on that issue. If a telco can't afford to perform competent work, they shouldn't be in business. > The bottom line is this is a wiring problem (detarriffed) and is the > responsibility of the property owner. In a multi-tenant residential or > business situation, the subscriber should NOT be hunting around on the 66 > block, the TELCO's side of the NETPOP. Granted that a tenant should not be poking around where he has no business (no pun intended ;), but neither should a building owner unless if he owns the backbone wire. A tenant's demarc is *in his demised space, not in any common area of the building*. > [Moderator's Note: Are you suggesting that it is *my problem* if my > phones are disrupted because in the building down the street some > tenant decides to save the cost of a professional installation by > doing it themselves and they park on my dial tone instead of their > own? In a matter of speaking, YES. You (Mr. Tenant) have the responsibility of insuring that the problem is not on YOUR side of the demarc, and to get telco working on it. One sure thing is that I (Mr. Building Owner) have no responsibility to you or Mr. Telco in any respect unless if I own the backbone wire, provide the dialtone, or physically damage the tenant's or telco's facilities. > Most of the old buildings got rid of their switchboards twenty years > ago in lieu of the tenant having their own phone service. Where telco > had previously had fifteen or twenty pairs come in and terminate on > the switchboard as trunk lines serving maybe 100-120 apartments, when > the board was yanked they had to come up with another hundred pairs or > so from the street that they could 'wire through' the big terminal box > in the basement to the house pairs into each apartment. The scenario you've described is the exception, rather than the rule, for typical New York City muli-tenant buildings. However, if telco haphazardly used former switch cabling for individual co lines it is clearly THEIR responsibility to deal with the consquences of poor facilities management later (assuming that someone hasn't purchased it or taken it by legal means). > Now where does customer premises wiring begin exactly? No question about it: inside of a tenant's demised space. A tenant has no business dealing with, and has no legal rights to, wire in any common area of the building without the building-owner's explicit permission. Telco's wire between the street and common areas of the building is *backbone* wire and is treated differently than inside wire, *Inside* wire begins at the customer's demarc inside of the tenant's space. > Do the house pairs belong to the building or are they part of telco > plant? If the building, then the building janitor can work on them, > right? Yes, the janitor could conceivably perform that function. Backbone wire ownership is governed by local property laws, consistent with the FCC docket on the wire detariffing issue. As long as telco continues to supply dialtone through the facilities, they still own it. Once they abandon the cable, it belongs to the building. For example, Western Union once provided direct service to customers in the Empire State Building through their own underground and backbone cables. Years ago they discontinued service, and abandoned the cables in place. I had WU fire-stop their conduit from the street (containing only a pull-string), and the other conduits they had running from their right-of-way (in the street) was cleared and re-used for Teleport fiber cables. All of their backbone wiring (still shown on their plant drawings) now belongs to ESB. WU literally gave up a treasured (and valuable) plant facility running though some of the most expensive business real estate. MCI (who purchased WU's rights-of-way) now owns empty pipes into the basement (and some well-preserved, but useless plant facility plans), and has no legal rights to go any further. > If the wires inside my apartment are my responsibility and I > refuse to have wire-maintainence, then if the yellow/black pair I am > not using get shorted somehow is it my problem, the person living down > the street's problem or telco's problem? Your responsibility extends to your demarc. If you have bridges on YOUR side of the demarc it's YOUR problem. However, if the pair is shorted, how do you know that there's someone else involved? > Most people do not even realize that between themselves and the CO > may be five or six places the pair can be jumped -- just look in > the basement of the building down the street. And most people couldn't care less, until their service is disrupted. It's clearly telco's responsibility. Just like hap-hazard fiber service deployment, they will deal with the consequences sooner or later, but how soon (or if at all) depends upon good (independent) telecom people to make them answer for poor plant management. Alan Boritz 72446.461@compuserve.com ------------------------------ From: dave.carpentier@oln.com Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 18:44:33 -0400 Subject: Re: Leftover Drops mac@rci.chi.il.us (Mark A. Cnota) writes: > depending on where the need is. This is cheaper than providing > everyone with their own separate pairs all the way back to the C.O., > including what you can predict for "future use" which may or may not > ever be used. Up here, this becomes somewhat less of a problem with the use of the SAC (service area concept) system. The plant is dedicated directly to the SAC box from the CO, and any outgoing plant cannot be multipled (at least in theory) . > What is more common is for the drop wire (and the interface > cross-connect if applicable) to stay in place after a line is > disconnected so that if another line is ordered the same facilities > can be re-used, saving manpower. Now if the same central office pair We call these situations "mail-outs", and the girls in assignment get plenty upset when we try to steal one to patch-up another trouble. It's policy to disconnect the old drop if a mail-out is to be assigned elsewhere. I suppose it does cost more, though. > business situation, the subscriber should NOT be hunting around on the 66 > block, the TELCO's side of the NETPOP. All new terminal installations have > the telco side and customer side clearly marked. And if you request, the I find the new BIPS and BEPS to work fine for this problem, they are sealed and can even be locked to keep curious fingers out (and flames in.). Course, building one of these out to a BIX system kinda makes it moot, as the wires can again be accessed by John Q. We don't use 66 blocks anymore because of the hazards of fire and metal broomhandles. Dave [Moderator's Note: When Illinois Bell guys are working on the pole or in some basement and they can't get a working pair, they just rip off some other pair and let someone else worry about it. :) One day my second line went dead but my first line was okay. I look out the window and see telco guy on the pole in the alley. I called Repair Service then and there and said to the lady please call the guy on the pole and tell him to undo whatever he just did. She gives me all this sass about how do I know its not in my own equipment and if they have to send smmeone out they will charge me, etc. I told her, look, I took a course in logic in college, my phone is working fine five minutes ago and now it is dead. I see a phone guy on the pole outside and you want to tell me to check my instruments? I told her if I had to go outside to see the man on the pole myself I would break his fingers so he would never be able to work on telephone wires again in his life! :) I guess they told him, because a couple minutes later I picked up my second line and heard him talking to somebody in the office about trying to get a good pair 'somewhere'. A long time ago I had a line which was one-way incoming, thus only battery and no dial tone on that line if you went off hook otherwise. The guys were really fond of using that one whenever they came up short somewhere else. When they heard no dialtone on it, they 'just assumed' it was an idle pair. PAT] ------------------------------ From: oracle@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Schroeder) Subject: Re: AT&T Spending $5(m) on Video Games Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 15:42:52 GMT GVC.COM!GDeinstadt (Gord Deinstadt) writes: > In Paul Robinson > writes: >> A few years ago some other company did the same thing, e.g. allow >> people to connect to a system and access video games and the >> equivalent. The company went bankrupt because people couldn't see >> paying a monthly fee for access to video games when you can purchase >> them once. Access to other people might be more valuable, I'm not >> sure. Actually, Sierra Inc. has a gaming BBS with interactive-online gaming. They've been running it for over two years, if I remember the ads correctly, and apparently are doing well. The BBS, from what I under- stand is about 80% gaming and 20% customer service -- selling games over the bbs and technical support type things. I don't belong myself, but know some people who do belong. I've not heard of anyone else doing this, but Sierra has stated in thier magazine that they do fairly well and I'm sure that part of it is the novelty of interactive gaming with people you don't know seeing VGA battles over your phone line! > I do think that "access to other people" as you put it is worth a > WHOLE lot; games are just games but other people are friends. > Nintendo or a competitor could have set up a data network for > long-distance game playing years ago. Their failure to do so, or even > to provide cheap modems and support for them in their games, is IMO > one of the great business blunders of the 20th century. (Right up > there with Telex providers ignoring the advent of PCs.) Well, maybe some other game companies will get on the bandwago if Sierra doesn't pack it all in in a few years! BTW: from an article in the last Sierra Newsletter, Sierra was one of those companies hard-hit from the drop in cartridge prices -- Almost wiped them out of business! John G. Schroeder oracle@unomaha.edu University of Nebraska @ Omaha Omaha, Nebraska, USA The Oracle/NetSeer The Oracle of the Heart ------------------------------ From: snyderra@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder) Subject: Re: Caller-ID Across LATAs? Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 07:51:11 -0400 (EDT) In article : > First, it is conceivable that a local telco is handling the whole > call, if an interLATA corridor has been authorized between the two > area codes. For example, New York Telephone is authorized to carry > traffic from 212 to most of 201, even though that is interLATA, > apparently because it convinced the FCC to honor some historical > corridor. Such a corridor does exist, but must be used explicitly, and does not reach 201. There is a corridor between the Philadelphia area of 215 and the New Jersey counties near Philly (Camden, Burlington, and I believe Glouster counties) in the 609 area code. Access is via 10NJB on the NJ Bell side and 10BPA on the Bell of Pennsylvania side. I believe the same thing exists between NYC and northern NJ counties. > If this is how the 215-to-201 call was handled, then maybe that > explains how the caller ID info got onto your screen. I could imagine > such a corridor for New Jersey Bell or for Bell of PA. No caller ID information comes across this corridor. At least, none that I have seen, and I know I get called using 10BPA from Philly because I do it to check my machine. Bob ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 05:18:06 PDT From: Eric_N._Florack.cru-mc@xerox.com Subject: Re: Radar Detectors In #557,Harold Hallikainen writes about how he wouldn't want to be in the business of making something that allowed people to violate the law. Pardon me, Harold, but it seems to me that several other things qualify as that. SCanners can be used for that, as well, yet these have legal purposes. SO can guns. So can computers. Any of thousands of things I might name. And further, (To tie this back to telcom) I view this in the same light as a subject I recall popping up in this list a couple years ago ... that being extension phones. Remember it used to be against the law to have extension phones not installed by the telco? I recall (still have it on file someplace) a rather lengthy post from someone in Michigan on just this subject. Took a whole Digest, as I recall it. In both cases, the only harm being caused is the larger group, loses a revenue source, regardless of the other (bogus) arguments presented. Which, in fact, is the primary purpose of traffic radar ... a revenue source. /E ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 07:34:00 +0000 From: David (D.) Boettger Subject: Re: Sprint Workers Fed Up, Start Unionizing Oh, puh-leeze let's not start a pro/anti-union debate. This is NOT the place for it. (You should know that, Mr. Moderator.) David Boettger boettger@bnr.ca I don't speak for my employer. [Moderator's Note: Certainly this is not a newsgroup to debate the pros and cons of union membership, but when large telecom companies find themselves in the middle of a debate on same by their employees it does become newsworthy. No one can seriously say that unions have greatly influenced the way AT&T has operated over the years. Good or bad? That's a topic for elsewhere I guess, but the changes are very plain to any historian of the company in the past hundred years. PAT] ------------------------------ From: otto@vaxb.acs.unt.edu Subject: Re: Radar and Acronyms Organization: University of North Texas Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 21:06:28 GMT Cliff Sharp writes: > LASER - Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation > MASER - Microwave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation > (coherent microwave beams, just as lasers give coherent light) > TASER - (before anyone asks) I think this is a made-up Trademark, but > maybe it should be Telescoping Anti-personnel Shocker Emasculated > by Rodney King :-) It's Thomas A. Swift's Electric Rifle; the inventor(s) came up with the acronym to make it fit in with laser, maser, and the like even though the principle has nothing to do with radiation. > FUBAR Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition. > LATA - Lousy A**h*les Treating you Arrogantly :-) What does it really stand for? I'm a newcomer to this list/newsgroup; is there a FAQ for frequently seen acronyms like the one that sci.space and sci.astro has? M. Otto otto@vaxb.acs.unt.edu "A virtual prisoner of UNT's VAX" [Moderator's Note: Local Area Transport something ... yes we have acronym files. All readers should have copies at hand for reference. Go to the archives and pull all the files which begin with the word 'glossary'. Use anonymous ftp lcs.mit.edu. PAT] Further note: This issue concludes the twelfth year of publication of TELECOM Digest. May year thirteen bring good luck to all of us! PAT] ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #562 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa23890; 12 Aug 93 13:25 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA30073 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 10:40:24 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA02444 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 10:39:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 10:39:44 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308121539.AA02444@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #563 TELECOM Digest Thu, 12 Aug 93 10:40:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 563 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson NSA Seeks Delay in Clipper (Dave Banisar) Analysis of Bell Atlantic Cellular (Paul Robinson) GSM Roaming Experiences (Juha Veijalainen) Motorola 8000H Mail Order? (William F. Quinn) Checks From IXC's (was "Toner Phoners") (Ole C. Hellevik) *69 as Caller-ID? (Rob Hansen) Jabra Earphone (was Sharper Image Products) (Brian Hess) About Caller-ID blocking in Virginia (Paul Robinson) FCC Docket 91-35 (Bonnie J. Johnson) Copyright Law FAQ (Terry Carroll) Talking Thermometer (Paul Cook) Bell Canada Prepay Card Trial (David Leibold) Motorola Jobs (Gary Sanders) Starting Another Year Here (TELECOM Moderator) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Organization: CPSR Washington Office From: Dave Banisar Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 9:37:14 EST Subject: NSA Seeks Delay in Clipper NSA Seeks Delay in Clipper Case The National Security Agency (NSA) has asked a federal court for a one-year delay in a lawsuit challenging the secrecy of the government's "Clipper Chip" encryption proposal. The suit was filed by Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR) on May 28 and seeks the disclosure of all information concerning the controversial plan. In an affidavit submitted to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on August 9, NSA Director of Policy Michael A. Smith states that NSA's search for records responsive to [CPSR's] request is under way, but is not yet complete. Because the Clipper Chip program is a significant one involving the participation of organizations in four of NSA's five Directorates and the Director's staff, the volume of responsive documents is likely to be quite large. Moreover, because the Clipper Chip program is highly complex and technical and is, in substantial part, classified for national security purposes, the review process cannot be accomplished quickly. CPSR called for the disclosure of all relevant information and full public debate on the proposal on April 16, the day it was announced. While NSA has insisted from the outset that the "Skipjack" encryption algorithm, which underlies the Clipper proposal, must remain secret, the Smith affidavit contains the first suggestion that the entire federal program is classified "in substantial part." In the interest of obtaining timely judicial review of the agency's broad classification claim, CPSR intends to oppose NSA's request for delay in the court proceedings. In another case involving government cryptography policy, CPSR has challenged NSA's classification of information concerning the development of the Digital Signature Standard (DSS). The court is currently considering the issue and a decision is expected soon. CPSR is a national public-interest alliance of computer industry professionals dedicated to examining the impact of technology on society. CPSR has 21 chapters in the U.S. and maintains offices in Palo Alto, California, and Washington, DC. For additional information on CPSR, call (415) 322-3778 or e-mail . David L. Sobel CPSR Legal Counsel ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 08:42:01 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM Subject: Analysis of Bell Atlantic Cellular From: Paul Robinson Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA A co-worker of mine obtained a cellular phone with service provided via Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems (BAMS). Bell Atlantic is the parent company of C&P Telephone {of Washington DC, Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia}. I had the opportunity to read the introductory pamphlet they send out and take notes. I thought this might be interesting: There is a "cute" thing: the page numbers at the bottom side are telephone buttons: page 5 consists of a button with rounded sides that says "5 JKL". Page 12 has two buttons on it, and so on. If your call is made to a number in the same area code, dial seven digits. If the number is in another area code, dial it plus the seven digit number. Dialing 1+ is not needed even for long distance calls. International calls must be made by dialing "0". Only calls to AT&T Long Distance will appear on the BAMS bill; all other carriers will bill separately. Airtime charges begin when the "send" key is pressed. Each partial minute of usage is billed as a full minute. Airtime charges include calls to opeator but do not include calls to busy numbers. Automaic Call Delivery is available in Philadelphia, New Jersey, and Metro New York. Follow Me Roaming (FMR) is also available, by dialing *18 to activate and *19 to cancel. FMR automatically cancels at midnight. The pamphlet also states that "Follow Me Roaming is a registered trademark of GTE Telecommunications Services." The usual services on a home phone including Call Waiting and Call Forwarding, among others, are available. (Call Waiting is toggled using the SEND key in place of the switch hook.) Airtime is charged for calls forwarded plus tolls and landline termination if sent to a wire phone. One feature mentioned is "Contact Line" which refers to "the most advanced wireless service ever launched commercially in the U.S., assigns a phone number to a person, not a place. Your number will follow you anywhere -- you decide where your number will ring and which calls you'll take ..." and it comes in four flavors. Want to bet it's more expensive than an AT&T 700 number and you pay for all incoming calls? Some dialable features include: *BAM - Customer Service (No airtime charge) *ITG - "Info To Go" (Airtime plus toll if applicable.) Horoscopes, Ski Conditions, Soap Opera updates and so on. You can get this for a local call on a wired phone by dialing the free (non surcharged) number from the competitive Yellow Pages or the C&P pages. *JAM - Connects you to a traffic consultant who will find alternate routing around traffic backups. Billing Indications also include: * - Call Crosses a rate period between peak and off-peak # - Call via call-waiting @ - Call via 3-way & - Call Forwarded call Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ------------------------------ From: JVE%FNAHA@TRENGA.UniGate1.Unisys.COM Date: 12 AUG 93 08:46 Subject: GSM Roaming Experiences Two weeks ago I had a chance to use my Finnish registered GSM phone in England. In general I was quite happy with it. Here are some notes: * first difference I noticed that registering to a network (in my case Vodafone) took longer time than at home, some 20 - 30 seconds instead of 5 - 10 seconds back home. * calls were connected almost immediately, no difference between local or international calls * GSM network coverage in central London was surprisingly patchy. For example Oxford street had several places were there was no network visible for my handheld phone (Ascom Crystal with small 1/8 (?) antenna). * despite earlier information, roaming foreign customers pay the normal or almost normal rate for local (within UK) calls. On the other hand, international calls were at significantly higher rates than back in Finland. * some functions were not available. For example, inquiring various call forwarding setups always returned a 'network error' message. * normal office phones in England seemed to be very sensitive to GSM transmission. I had to stay several metres away from _any_ phones; otherwise people would not have been able to use them, all they would have heard was a loud buzz. My own phone at home and my office phone are not so sensitive. GSM phone antenna needs to be within centimetres of the phone before you can hear any interference. Anyone got an explanation? Lax EC phone/electrical standards... ;-) Juha Veijalainen 4ge system analyst, tel. +358 0 4528 426 Unisys Finland Internet: JVE%FNAHA@trenga.tredydev.unisys.com >> Mielipiteet omiani ** Opinions are PERSONAL, facts are suspect << ------------------------------ From: quinn@austin.ibm.com (William F. Quinn) Subject: Motorola 8000H Mail Order? Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 08:15:28 GMT Reply-To: quinn@austin.ibm.com Organization: IBM Austin Anyone know of a discount mail order company specializing in celluar phone hardware? Thanks. ------------------------------ Subject: Checks From IXC's (was "Toner Phoners") Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 22:43:19 PDT From: ole!linqdev!oleh@nwnexus.wa.com Stephen Friedl (friedl@mtndew.Tustin.CA.US) and David Breneman (daveb@jaws.engineering.dgtl.com) both seem to complain that they receive checks from various LD carriers. Not only are businesses complaining that expected checks are not received, some even complain of unwanted checks! Stop whining and make sure you read incoming mail before you act upon it. USMail is not a secure channel. This goes for checks and whatever else you might receive. ~~:-( I received a $75 check from AT&T approx three or four months ago with the same 'endorse = switch' small print, but threw it away because I like my current carrier (MCI). A month or so later I received another check, and this time I called MCI customer service ("I really love you, but this is seventy-five bucks!), acting on a posting on c.d.t. Their customer-service person asked me to mail her the check (with her name as attention), and I received a thank-you-for-telling-us note a little while later. Last Friday I got my last USWest phone bill and it included three credit items from MCI, $75 (the AT&T check), $10 (I don't remember what for) and $6.something (they had a different number for my second international Friends and Family). Result: my total bill for this month was 11.03C (that is credit), i.e.: MCI paid even my local phone bill for that month. I'm one happy phone customer, just hoping to receive more checks in the mail. If I can use them I'll cash them, otherwise I will throw them away. Ole C. Hellevik oleh@linqdev.com I do not speak for anyone but myself. ------------------------------ From: hansen@inference.com (Rob Hansen) Subject: *69 as Caller-ID? Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 07:59:12 PDT As you probably know, Caller-ID is not available in California. However, Priority*Ring (distinctive ring when someone on your personal list calls you) and Call*Return are both available. I personally use Priority*Ring, and have used it as a form of Caller-ID. When I suspected a certain individual was making annoying calls to me, I deleted everyone else from my list and was able to confirm or deny my suspicions. I do not have Call*Return. My question is this: If I call "John Doe" who uses Call*Return on me, will the system read my number back to him? Assuming it won't and isn't allowed to, what happens if I'm far enough away from John that I the call costs him money? Will my number show up on his phone bill? If it will, isn't this a violation of the rules? Curious ... Rob ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 23:32:49 -0400 From: bnh@active.com (Brian Hess) Subject: Jabra Earphone [Re: Sharper Image products] > 2) Hands Free Ear Phone -- A hands free phone without a mike boom The company that makes these has the euphonious name "Jabra" (onomotopoeic for "jabber" to me :-). They claim that the microphone *does* pick up some room sounds, but it's not too annoying. They also make an earbud/mic combination for Macs so you can plug into the mic/speaker on the back of your machine. Their president said something about hoping for a cordless version someday soon, and was describing a thing somewhat smaller than the size of their current base unit, that would be tucked in your shirt pocket. And then she went on about R&D for a bone-conduction microphone instead of the hole-in-the-earbud model. Who knows ... Anybody have any actual use data on these babies? They certainly look cute, but who can tell without having been on both sides of the conversation with one. (For example, I saw people here talking about comparing some cordless digital thing with the Tropez. Well, the Tropez is just *awful* IMHO, doing low-res digitization and clipping off the front of your speech (perhaps as a result of the res). You don't know this of course, until a friend on the other end of the line asks if you have a cold or something!) Come on, fess up, you gadget freaks who bought one as soon as you saw it -- inquiring minds want to know! Brian Hess Active Ingredients, Inc. bnh@active.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 08:23:12 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM Subject: About Caller-ID Blocking in Virginia From: Paul Robinson Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA I was visiting my sister in Arlington, Virginia and wanted to check something. Since I "knew" that Caller-ID blocking is not available in Virginia, and my sister is not a police officer or someone with special permission, I decided to dial the *67 code to see what the recording was for someone not authorized (in Maryland I'd get a stutter dial tone meaning it was accepted.) So I dialed *67 expecting a recording. What I got was a STUTTER DIAL TONE! I don't know anyone who has a Caller-ID box to try and ask them if this works, but it makes me wonder: has C&P Telephone simply programmed all of their switches in the Washington, DC area the same way (and thus installed Caller-ID blocking in the Virginia suburbs even though it's not required) or is it a mistake of some kind? Or are they simply implementing Caller ID block even though they don't have to do so? I don't want to ask the phone company in case it's a mistake, (then again, some of them might read this column anyway ...) I want to find out if this is a "real" block or just the switch accepting *67 and then ignoring it. Can someone who has (or knows someone who has) Caller-ID block blocking in the Washington, DC Area (Montgomery & Prince George's Counties in Maryland; Washington, DC; Arlington, and Fairfax Counties and the independent cities of Fairfax, Alexandria, Vienna and Falls Church, VA) give me a number to check that would refuse blocked calls? I used to have one but I can't find it. Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 08:49:02 EDT From: Bonnie J Johnson Subject: FCC Docket 91-35 Sorry Pat, I wish I could find an easy way to FTP but my source right now is only hard copy-they are working on a version for the Mac, but that wouldn't help. Sorry, bj [Moderator's Note: Then as you volunteered earlier, people who want a copy will need to contact you directly with their mail address. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 23:55:24 EDT From: Terry Carroll Subject: Copyright Law FAQ In case anyone cares about this type of thing, I've written a fairly extensive FAQ on U.S. copyright law, which is available via ftp from charon.amdahl.com, /pub/misc.legal/Copyright-FAQ. I've noted a lot of erroneous statements on copyright law on the net, so I decided to do my part to try to clarify it. For most assertions of law, the FAQ contains citation to statutes, regulations, or cases for support. Terry Carroll, Santa Clara, CA Internet: tjc50@juts.ccc.amdahl.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 15:27 GMT From: 0003991080@mcimail.com Subject: Talking Thermometer Can anyone help me find a talking thermometer? It would help if it were rugged enough for continuous commercial use, read out in degrees C, and even better if it had a telephone line interface, although this is not an absolute necessity. Paul Cook 206-881-7000 Proctor & Associates MCI Mail 399-1080 15050 NE 36th St. fax: 206-885-3282 Redmond, WA 98052-5378 3991080@mcimail.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 23:17 EDT From: djcl@io.org (woody) Subject: Bell Canada Prepay Card Trial [from Bell News (Bell Canada / Bell Ontario) 9 August 1993] Bell to conduct market trial for prepaid LD cards. Bell, joined by BCTel and AGT, will conduct a market trial of a new product that will allow customers in Canada without Calling Cards [tm], credit cards or coins, to call virtually anywhere in the world. Called HELLO! [tm] Phone Pass, the card is designed to help international and domestic travellers in Canada. The trials are scheduled to take place from September 20, 1993 to March 31, 1994. The HELLO! [tm] Phone Pass will become available on a Stentor-wide national basis in spring 1994, pending the outcome of the trial. Bell and the other Stentor phone companies are the first major long distance carriers in Canada to test this new product. The HELLO! [tm] Phone Pass service is just one of the many new services we are rolling out for the benefit of our customers. Convenient and easy to use, the HELLO! [tm] Phone Pass will be about the same size and shape as a Calling Card [tm], and will be available in denominations of $20 for the duration of the trial. The cost of the card includes applicable federal and provincial taxes. Eventually the HELLO! [tm] Phone Pass will be available in larger and smaller denominations. Customers will initially be able to purchase the cards at selected Bell Phonecentre [tm] stores, or at vending machines in certain high traffic areas. Over time, the cards would become available through other convenient channels. The cards will initially be available in English, French, Cantonese and Japanese. Other languages may be available in the future. To use the card, a customer simply dials 1-800 to reach an automated multi- lingual voice response system. The customer then inputs a 12 digit card number found on the back of the card, followed by the long distance number desired. Once the number is dialed, the system determines the value remaining on the card, and states the allowable number of minutes for that particular call. The call may continue until the funds ont the card reach zero, or until the caller wishes to terminate the conversation. The voice system informs the caller when the call is within one minute of reaching zero funds. Additional features will be added to the HELLO! [tm] Phone Pass service as it evolves over time. [end of article] -------------------- DL: Some things come to mind in the above: 1) how did Bell Canada pull off the trademark on the word HELLO??? 2) Talk Tickets seem to be similar (and perhaps even more advanced) to the service Bell is trying here; 3) aren't there more digits after one "simply dials 1-800"?; 4) are Talk Tickets (the apparent inspiration for this new Bell Canada venture) available to Canadians and/or usable from Canada?) [Moderator's Note: In David's message above he referred to 'AT&T Talk Tickets' and I removed the 'AT&T' part since that company is the carrier for the Talk Ticket traffic but not the owner of the card other than through very indirect connections with their largest reseller and aggregator, etc. I don't know which debit card came first; Western Union started with them about the same time as Talk Ticket I believe. Everyone seems to have gotten the idea at the same time as there are now several competing brands. Mine are still 39 cents per minute when purchased in quantity at a discount, but I don't have nearly the distribution network of the big players. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 07:34 EDT From: gws@n8emr.cmhnet.org (Gary Sanders) Subject: Motorola Jobs I posted a note several weeks ago about the Motorola Iridium program starting because I received a call from head hunters. I received many email messages and a couple phone calls from people wanting the head hunters info. At the time I didn't have it because I wasn't interested in the job and just round filed the info. I received a followup letter from them. Here's the information. I have nothing to do with the company; I am just passing on the info. CCS Consultants 908-264-8300 I talked with Pamela Lamb. Gary W. Sanders gws@n8emr.cmhnet.org, 72277,1325 N8EMR @ N8JYV (ip addr) 44.70.0.1 [Ohio AMPR address coordinator] HAM BBS 614-895-2553 (1200/2400/V.32/PEP) Voice: 614-895-2552 (eves/weekends) ------------------------------ From: TELECOM Moderator Subject: Starting Another Year Here Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 10:03:00 CDT TELECOM Digest started on August 11, 1981 so the list has completed twelve years of publication and starts year thirteen at this time. The list has grown tremendously since the beginning, and now the Digest is circulated not only through its own mailing list and on Usenet (where it appears as comp.dcom.telecom) but also on just about every email system in the world -- wherever people ask to subscribe -- and numerous independent bulletin board systems. Readers on GEnie and Compuserve receive it as to readers on America On-Line, Prodigy and quite a few other places. From one issue of the Digest every two or three days in the beginning, the volume of mail has grown to the point that several issues per day are needed to keep up with the flow most days, and several hours per day of time are required to edit the submissions, circulate them, and maintain the mailing list, among other duties. My thanks are given to the many readers who have sent notes of congratulations and encouragement in the past few days marking this anniversary. Please remember that TELECOM Digest is financially supported through the generous gifts of readers and the sale of telephone services and products on an affinity and ongoing residual basis. Your help is very important -- more important than ever -- as year thirteen gets under way here. Our office address is: Telecom Digest / 2241 W. Howard St. #208 / Chicago, IL 60645 Patrick Townson ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #563 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa02541; 12 Aug 93 19:25 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA10546 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 16:40:20 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA23573 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 16:39:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 16:39:43 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308122139.AA23573@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #564 TELECOM Digest Thu, 12 Aug 93 16:39:30 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 564 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Country Code Reverse List (Paul Cook) Call for Papers IFIP SEC'94 Caribbean (fortrie@cipher.nl) Bidirectional and 7-Bit Zmodem (Paul Robinson) Instream Inaccurate Digit Correcton (Paul Robinson) Unrequested Remote Call Forwarding (Paul Robinson) Cellular Phone With Mac Powerbook (Brandy N. Justice) Looking For Information: ISDN Data Modules (Kurt Kokko) A Converter From Pulse to Tone (Vittorio Mischi) ---------------------- TELECOM Digest is an e-journal devoted mostly -- but not exclusively -- to discussions on voice telephony. The Digest is a not-for-profit public service published frequently by Patrick Townson Associates. PTA markets a no-surcharge telephone calling card and a no monthly fee 800 service. In addition, we are resellers of AT&T's Software Defined Network. For a detailed discussion of our services, write and ask for the file 'products'. The Digest is delivered at no charge by email to qualified subscribers on any electronic mail service connected to the Internet. To join the mail- ing list, write and tell us how you qualify: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu. All article submissions MUST be sent to our email address: telecom@eecs. nwu.edu -- NOT as replies to comp.dcom.telecom. Back issues and numerous other telephone-related files of interest are available from the Telecom Archives, using anonymous ftp lcs.mit.edu. Login anonymous, then 'cd telecom-archives'. At the present time, the Digest is also ported to Usenet at the request of many readers there, where it is known as 'comp.dcom.telecom'. Use of the Digest does not require the use of our products and services. The two are separate. All articles are the responsibility of the individual authors. Organi- zations listed, if any, are for identification purposes only. The Digest is compilation-copyrighted, 1993. **DO NOT** cross-post articles between the Digest and other Usenet or alt newsgroups. Do not compile mailing lists from the net-addresses appearing herein. Send tithes and love offerings to PO Box 1570, Chicago, IL 60690. :) Phone: 312-465-2700. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 18:35 GMT From: Proctor & Associates <0003991080@mcimail.com> Subject: Country Code Reverse List Sometimes I get a fax from overseas and there is no clue as to where it is from. I decided I needed a reverse list of country codes in numerical order, after I wearied of paging through the AT&T International Telecommunications Guide. Here is one that I just sorted. If there isn't one already in the Telecom Archives, maybe this could go there. Country Country Country Country Code Code 7 Armenia (C.I.S.) 350 Gibraltar 7 Azerbaijan (C.I.S.) 351 Azores 7 Belarus (C.I.S.) 351 Madeira Island 7 Georgia (C.I.S.) 351 Portugal 7 Kazakhstan (C.I.S.) 352 Luxembourg 7 Kyrgyzstan (C.I.S.) 353 Ireland 7 Lithuania (C.I.S.) 354 Iceland 7 Moldova (C.I.S.) 355 Albania 7 Russia (C.I.S.) 356 Malta 7 Tajikstan (C.I.S.) 357 Cyprus 7 Turkmenistan (C.I.S.) 358 Finland 7 Ukraine (C.I.S.) 359 Bulgaria 7 Uzbekistan (C.I.S.) 372 Estonia (C.I.S.) 20 Egypt, Arab Rep. 374 Latvia (C.I.S.) 27 South Africa 500 Falkland Island 30 Greece 501 Belize 31 Netherlands(Holland) 502 Guatemala 32 Belgium 503 El Salvador 33 Andorra 504 Honduras 33 France 505 Nicaragua 33 Monaco 506 Costa Rica 34 Canary Islands 507 Panama 34 Spain 508 St. Pierre/Miquelon 36 Hungary 509 Haiti 38 Yugoslavia 590 Guadelope 39 Italy 591 Bolivia 39 San Marino, Rep. 592 Guyana 39 Vatican City 593 Ecuador 40 Romania 594 Cayenne (Fr.Guiana) 41 Liechtenstein 594 French Guiana 41 Switzerland 595 Paraguay 42 Czechoslovakia 596 French Antilles 43 Austria 596 Martinique (Fr.Ant.) 44 United Kingdom 597 Suriname 45 Denmark 598 Uruguay 46 Sweden 599 Curacao (Neth.Ant.) 47 Norway 599 Netherlands Ant. 48 Poland 599 Saba (Neth.Ant.) 49 Germany 599 St. Eustatius 51 Peru 599 St. Maarten 52 Mexico 642 Antartica 53 Guantanamo Bay 670 Mariana Is. (Saipan) 54 Argentine Rep. 670 Saipan 55 Brazil 671 Guam 56 Chile 672 Antartica 57 Colombia 672 Christmas Island 58 Venezuela 672 Cocos Island 60 Malaysia 672 Norfolk Island 61 Australia 673 Brunei 62 Indonesia 674 Naura 63 Philippines 675 Papua (New Guinea) 64 New Zealand 676 Tonga 65 Singapore 677 Solomon Islands 66 Thailand 678 Vanuatu 81 Japan 679 Fiji Islands 81 Okinawa 680 Palau 82 Korea 681 Wallis & Futuna 84 Vietnam 682 Cook Islands 86 China, People's Rep 683 Niue Island 90 Turkey 684 American Samoa 91 India 685 Western Samoa 92 Pakistan 686 Gilbert Islands 93 Afghanistan 686 Kiribati 94 Sri Lanka 687 New Caledonia 98 Iran 688 Tuvalu 212 Morocco 689 French Polynesia 213 Algeria 689 Tahiti 214 Algeria 691 Micronesia 215 Algeria 692 Marshall Islands 216 Tunisia AC 809 Anguilla 218 Libyan Arab Rep. AC 809 Antigua 220 Gambia AC 809 Bahamas 221 Senegal AC 809 Barbados 222 Mauritania AC 809 Bermuda 223 Mali Republic AC 809 British V.I. 224 Guinea AC 809 Cayman Islands 225 Ivory Coast AC 809 Dominica 226 Burkina Faso AC 809 Dominican Republic 227 Rep. of Niger AC 809 Grenada (W.I.) 228 Togolese Rep. AC 809 Jamaica 229 Dahomey (Benin) AC 809 Montserrat 230 Mauritius AC 809 Nevis 231 Liberia AC 809 St. Croix 232 Sierra Leone AC 809 St. Kitts 233 Ghana AC 809 St. Lucia 234 Nigeria AC 809 St. Thomas 235 Chad AC 809 St. Vincent 236 Cent. Afr. Republic AC 809 Trinidad/Tobago 237 Cameroon AC 809 Turks/Caicos 238 Cape Verde Islands AC 809 Puerto Rico 239 Principe 852 Hong Kong 239 Sao Tome 853 Macao 240 Equatorial Guinea 855 Cambodia 241 Gabon Republic 871 Inmarsat (E. Atl.) 242 Congo 872 Inmarsat (Pacific) 243 Zaire 873 Inmarsat (Indian) 244 Angola 874 Inmarsat (W. Atl.) 245 Guinea-Bissau 880 Bangladesh 247 Ascension Island 886 China, Taiwan 248 Seychelle 886 Taiwan (Rep of China) 250 Rwanda 960 Maldive Islands 251 Ethiopia 961 Lebanon 253 Djibouti 962 Jordan 254 Kenya 963 Syrian Arab Republic 255 Zanzibar (Tanzania) 964 Iraq 256 Uganda 965 Kuwait 257 Burundi 966 Saudi Arabia 258 Mozambique 967 Yemen(Arab Republic) 260 Zambia 968 Muscat 261 Madagascar 968 Oman 262 Reunion Island 971 Abu Dhabi (UAE) 263 Zimbabwe 971 Ajman (UAE) 264 Namibia 971 Dubai (UAE) 264 Southwest Africa 971 Fujairah (UAE) 265 Malawi 971 Ra's Al Khaymah (UAE) 266 Lesotho 971 Sharjah (UAE) 267 Botswana 971 Umm Al Qaiwain (UAE) 268 Swaziland 971 United Arab Emirates 269 Comoros 972 Israel 269 Mayotte Island 973 Bahrain 290 St. Helena Island 974 Qatar 297 Aruba (Neth.Ant) 975 Bhutan 298 Faeroe Islands 976 Mongolia 299 Greenland 977 Nepal Paul Cook 206-881-7000 Proctor & Associates MCI Mail 399-1080 15050 NE 36th St. fax: 206-885-3282 Redmond, WA 98052-5378 3991080@mcimail.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 01:45 +0100 From: fortrie@cipher.nl Subject: Call for Papers IFIP SEC'94 Caribbean Call for Papers IFIP SEC'94 - updated information August 1993 C A L L F O R P A P E R S Technical Committee 11 - Security and Protection in Information Processing Systems - of the UNESCO affiliated INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING - IFIP, announces: Its TENTH INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION SECURITY CONFERENCE, IFIP SEC'94 TO BE HELD IN THE NETHERLANDS ANTILLES (CARIBBEAN), FROM MAY 23 THROUGH MAY 27, 1994. Organized by Technical Committee 11 of IFIP, in close cooperation with the Special Interest Group on Information Security of the Dutch Computer Society and hosted by the Caribbean Computer Society, the TENTH International Information Security Conference IFIP SEC'94 will be devoted to advances in data, computer and communications security management, planning and control. The conference will encompass developments in both theory and practise, envisioning a broad perspective of the future of information security. The event will be lead by its main theme "Dynamic Views on Information Security in Progress". Papers are invited and may be practical, conceptual, theoretical, tutorial or descriptive in nature, addressing any issue, aspect or topic of information security. Submitted papers will be refereed, and those presented at the conference, will be included in the formal conference proceedings. Submissions must not have been previously published and must be the original work of the author(s). Both the conference and the five tutorial expert workshops are open for refereed presentations. The purpose of IFIP SEC'94 is to provide the most comprehensive international forum and platform, sharing experiences and interchanging ideas, research results, development activities and applications amongst academics, practitioners, manufacturers and other professionals, directly or indirectly involved with information security. The conference is intended for computer security researchers, security managers, advisors, consultants, accountants, lawyers, edp auditors, IT, adminiatration and system managers from government, industry and the academia, as well as individuals interested and/or involved in information security and protection. IFIP SEC'94 will consist of a FIVE DAY - FIVE PARALLEL STREAM - enhanced conference, including a cluster of SIX FULL DAY expert tutorial workshops. In total over 120 presentations will be held. During the event the second Kristian Beckman award will be presented. The conference will address virtually all aspects of computer and communications security, ranging from viruses to cryptology, legislation to military trusted systems, safety critical systems to network security, etc. The six expert tutorial workshops, each a full day, will cover the following issues: Tutorial A: Medical Information Security Tutorial B: Information Security in Developing Nations Tutorial C: Modern Cryptology Tutorial D: IT Security Evaluation Criteria Tutorial E: Information Security in the Banking and Financial Industry Tutorial F: Security of Open/Distributed Systems Each of the tutorials will be chaired by a most senior and internationally respected expert. The formal proceedings will be published by Elsevier North Holland Publishers, including all presentations, accepted papers, key-note talks, and invited speeches. The Venue for IFIP SEC'94 is the ITC World Trade Center Convention Facility at Piscadera Bay, Willemstad, Curacao, Netherlands Antilles. A unique social program, including formal banquet, giant 'all you can eat' beach BBQ, island Carnival night, and much more will take care of leisure and relax time. A vast partners program is available, ranging from island hopping, boating, snorkeling and diving to trips to Bonaire, St. Maarten, and Caracas. A special explorers trip up the Venezuela jungle and the Orinoco River is also available. For families a full service kindergarten can take care of youngsters. The conference will be held in the English language. Spanish translation for Latin American delegates will be available. Special arrangements with a wide range of hotels and appartments complexes in all rate categories have been made to accommodate the delegates and accompanying guests. (*) The host organizer has made special exclusive arrangements with KLM Royal Dutch Airlines and ALM Antillean Airlines for worldwide promotional fares in both business and tourist class. (**) (*)(**) Our own IFIP TC11 inhouse TRAVEL DESK will serve from any city on the globe. All authors of papers submitted for the referee process will enjoy special benefits. Authors of papers accepted by the International Referee Committee will enjoy extra benefits. If sufficient proof (written) is provided, students of colleges, universities and science institutes within the academic community, may opt for student enrollment. These include special airfares, appartment accommodations, discounted participation, all in a one packet prepaid price. (Authors' benefits will not be affected) INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS Five copies of the EXTENDED ABSTRACT, consisting of no more than 25 double spaced typewritten pages, including diagrams and illustrations, of approximately 5000 words, must be received by the Program Committee no later than November 15th, 1993. We regret that electronically transmitted papers, papers on diskettes, papers transmitted by fax and handwritten papers are not accepted. Each paper must have a title page, which includes the title of the paper, full names of all author(s) and their title(s), complete address(es), including affiliation(s), employer(s), telephone/fax number(s) and email address(es). To facilitate the blind refereeing process the author(s)' particulars should only appear on the separate title page. The language of the conference papers is English. The first page of the manuscript should include the title, a keyword list and a 50 word introduction. The last page of the manuscript should include the reference work (if any). Authors are invited to express their interest in participating in the contest, providing the Program Committee with the subject or issue that the authors intend to address (e.g. crypto, viruses, legal, privacy, design, access control, etc.) This should be done preferably by email to < TC11@CIPHER.NL >, or alternately sending a faxmessage to +31 43 619449 (Program Committee IFIP SEC'94) The extended abstracts must be received by the Program Committee on or before November 15th, 1993. Notification of acceptance will be mailed to contestants on or before December 31, 1993. This notification will hold particular detailed instructions for the presentation and the preparation of camera ready manuscripts of the full paper. Camera ready manuscripts must be ready and received by the Program Committee on or before February 28, 1994. If you want to submit a paper, or you want particular information on the event, including participation, please write to: IFIP SEC'94 Secretariat Postoffice Box 1555 6201 BN MAASTRICHT THE NETHERLANDS - EUROPE or fax to: IFIP SEC'94 Secretariat: +31 43 619449 (Netherlands) or email to: < TC11@CIPHER.NL > Special request to all electronic mail readers: Please forward this Call for Papers to all networks and listservices that you have access to, or otherwise know of. Sincerely, IFIP TC 11 Secretariat ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 12:57:36 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM Subject: Bidirectional and 7-Bit Zmodem From: Paul Robinson Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA I'd like to find people interested in either a Bidirectional version of Zmodem or in one which will operate on a 7-bit link. (Current Zmodem implementations use 8 bits.) Those who are interested in: (1) the idea; (2) the concepts; (3) in defining the specifications; (4) in making suggestions; (5) in writing code; are requested to write to me and if there is much interest, I'll set up a mailing list to handle it. Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 12:11:38 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM Subject: Instream Inaccurate Digit Correcton From: Paul Robinson Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA In an article titled " Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address", Blake Patterson , writes: > Do any phone companies allow midstream digit correction when > placing a phone call? I've never heard of that option, but > I'd pay for it. I don't see how you can do it now. Unless we make the * key the delete key at any point *except* as the first character of the dialed number to allow for feature requests such as *70 or *67. Since ** might be used for some features, a * could not be used to edit a star code either. The answer is to buy a phone that has on-hook dialing with a display so you can do that. We have two very nice laser fax machines at my office, both have the capacity to read a fax in and store it and send it out after reading it, so you can load one or more faxes into memory while a fax is being sent or received. There is a "clear" key on the front panel that if you push it, it backspaces one digit off the dialed number (unless you are dialing directly, then, of course it can't.) It is a *very nice* feature, especially on overseas calls where a number can be misread. I wish the feature was more widely available. I like the capability of fixing a number before dialing it. Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 11:20:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul Robinson <0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM> Reply-To: Paul Robinson <0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM> Subject: Unrequested Remote Call Forwarding Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA A posting on the Risks list discussed how an inmate at a state penetentiary was able to get some private party's phone to be enabled with Remote Call Forwarding (RCF), AND got someone from the phone company to give them the security code over the phone. I just thought about this. A while back I had two additional phone lines installed in my house to add to the two I already had. At the request of the person who wanted the extra line, I put "Ultra Call Forward" (C&P Telephone's name for RCF) on one of the lines. It just occurred to me, if I'm not mistaken, that the clerk did give me the information (800 number if long distance; local number if local) to set up the service and passcode) at the time I requested the service change even though he did not ask me for any personal identification when I placed the order. It's been said on TELECOM Digest several times that inmates in prisons make calls that have to be made collect only. Are they referring to the phones provided by the correctional facility or are the pay phones set up so they cannot place calls other than collect? If prison pay phones can only call collect, then the person that did this had to have an outsider do this, or they had to be calling an 800 number (can prison phones call 1-800 numbers? If not, how do they call their lawyer if he has one?) Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1993 12:11:20 -0400 (EDT) From: brandy n justice Subject: Cellular Phone With Mac Powerbook I'm attempting to hook up a Mac Powerbook with my cellular phone in hopes of accessing the Internet. The Powerbook has an internal modem... Global Village, I think. I'm not sure if I need a different phone or what. Any suggestions? Do you know if I need any special equipment or anything of that sort? Thanks for your help, because I know nothing about this. Brandy N. Justice Furman University Freshman (615) 435-4572 ------------------------------ From: kokko@esca.com (Kurt Kokko) Subject: Looking for info -ISDN Data Modules Organization: ESCA Corporation, Bellevue WA Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 16:38:28 GMT I am looking for info on availible ISDN "data modules" (RBOC's term.) I need a device to provide access to both B channels from a V.35 port, and to support ACU (V.25 bis) dialing. Our RBOC wants $1,100 per B channel. Thanks, kokko@esca.com Kurt Kokko (206) 822-6800 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1993 19:10:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Vittorio Mischi Subject: A Converter From Pulse to Tone I am looking for a device that converts pulse signals into tone signals. I believe there must be circuits around. I am looking for something that can be plugged into a PC as any modem board and can be used on a bank of lines concurrently (that is from different users at the same time). It should be able to fill up a buffer and then spit out the sequential string of tones quickly. I also have a question on the conversion: are there any unique strings of pulse signals that can be translated into the #,*,A,B,C,or D Tone? Any comment, reference or offer for help is very appreciated. Thanks, Vittorio Mischi Carnegie Mellon University (standard disclaimers apply) ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #564 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa03262; 12 Aug 93 19:57 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA26817 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 17:21:18 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA26570 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 17:20:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 17:20:41 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308122220.AA26570@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #565 TELECOM Digest Thu, 12 Aug 93 17:20:40 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 565 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: What is Category 5 (re: ISDN) (Al Varney) Re: What is Category 5 (re: ISDN) (Fred R. Goldstein) Re: Is This Legal? (Jim Rees) Re: Is This Legal? (Gary L. Dare) Re: Is This Legal? (Atri Indiresan) Re: Is This Legal? (Paul Joslin) Re: Hotel Rip-Off - Is This a Record? (Ken Thompson) Re: Hotel Rip-Off - Is This a Record? (Greg Abbott) Re: Error Rates For 2400 Baud Modems (David Leibold) Re: Error Rates For 2400 Baud Modems (Paul Robinson) Re: Another Look at Alex Bell (Derek Andrew) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 17:49:34 CDT From: varney@ihlpe.att.com Subject: Re: What is Category 5 (re: ISDN) Organization: AT&T In article hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) writes: > In article goldstein@carafe.tay2.dec. > com (Fred R. Goldstein) writes: > I've gotten several mile local loops (for FM radio stations) > with 70 dB or more of dynamic range. So, why do they only use 4 > levels in the 2B1Q? Seems like a lot more would be available > (stuffing more bps into a baud) before noise starts making it > difficult to determine what the actual transmit analog level is. Or, > is the problem intersymbol interference where the level of one quat > has an effect on those surrounding it, making the level of this > particular quat difficult to determine? I've written about loop plant characteristics in the "comp.dcom.isdn" a few times, and won't repeat all the stuff here. Much of my meager knowledge is based on the book "Digital Transmission Systems and Networks", Vol. II, M. J. Miller & S.V. Ahamed, Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD, 1988. A sub-chapter is headed "The major limitations for loop data transmission" and details the following imperfections of subscriber loops and their effects on ISDN data rates: Physical: - 1 or more guage changes between CO and subscriber (each of these junctions can be a reflection point, and obviously alter the overall loop characteristics) - Bridged taps (open circuit cable sections tapped off the "main" loop) (these provide reflections of transmitted signals, and attenuation of signals from the far end, as well as major shifts in impedance. Imagine a quarter-wave unterminated circuit bridged onto your loop at one or more arbitrary points -- a reflected pulse will return just in time to occupy the next bit position.) - Loading coils, used on loops longer than about 18000 ft (5486 km) (these suppress high frequencies to the point that everyone just says these won't support the "U" interface) In the US in 1973, such loops accounted for 24% of subscriber loops. This number has certainly gone down due to DLC, etc. deployment. - Open wire (inductive 60 Hz coupling/crosstalk and impedance changes with weather). - Temperature (can change reactive component of impedance significantly). Electrical: - Crosstalk (including crosstalk from adjacent T1 lines;) - Lightning surges; - EMF; In a 1973 loop survey of (pre-divest) AT&T loops, the average loop was 7748.63 ft. long (2.262 km), had 4 sections and 1.64 bridged taps. The average tap was 922.42 ft. (0.282 km). Loops of less than 1000 ft. had taps averaging 1333 ft. in length. Characteristic impedance toward the CO is markedly different than toward the subscriber on the same loop. >> To make all this work, impedance is specified, with very picky >> transformers needed for S/T to meet spec. S/T uses separate transmit >> and receive wires, thus a 4-wire interface. The BRI U uses one pair, >> so there's some fancy echo cancellation done inside the transceiver >> ("UBAT", in AT&T terms) chip. Real fancy. > It seems that if the characteristic impedance of the line is > matched, there should be no "far end echo", or , at least, it should > be substantially attenuated. The "near end echo" (side tone on POTS) > seems like it could be cancelled pretty well if we precisely know the > impedance the line presents to the interface. If the far end has > indeed terminated the line with its characteristic impedance, then it > seems the near end should have the same impedance. I haven't messed > with long twisted pairs to play with the transmission line effects, > but it would sure be fun. See above -- remember that ISDN deployment SHOULD be possible without doing fancy impedance matching on loops, and SHOULD continue to work as the loop plant changes with weather, time, repairs, etc. > It seems like the throughput of a line is going to be limited by its > analog dynamic range and the attenuation versus frequency. Is the > attenuation versus frequency (frequency response) reversible with an > equalizer? It seems that most equalizers that adjust the amplitude > response also adjust the phase response (making it nonlinear). > It also seems that a long twisted pair would have a linear phase > response (propogation delay relatively independent of frequency). Can > we feed a high speed multilevel pulse waveform in one end of a twisted > pair and, with equalization, pull it back out the other end? The trickest part for ISDN seems to be handling echo since the 2-wire line is both sending and receiving at the same time (in the 2B1Q version). You seem to be looking at a uni-directional signal on a two-wire pair. The four-wire version of ISDN will work over dozens of miles, since this is essentially a low-speed verison of a T1 (1.544MHz) line. Al Varney - just my opinion ------------------------------ From: goldstein@carafe.tay2.dec.com (Fred R. Goldstein) Subject: Re: What is Category 5 (re: ISDN) Organization: Digital Equipment Corp., Littleton MA USA Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 05:19:03 GMT In article hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) writes: Sheesh! I post a glib answer and somebody comes back with a substantive reply! :-) > I've gotten several mile local loops (for FM radio stations) > with 70 dB or more of dynamic range. So, why do they only use 4 > levels in the 2B1Q? Seems like a lot more would be available > (stuffing more bps into a baud) before noise starts making it > difficult to determine what the actual transmit analog level is. Or, > is the problem intersymbol interference where the level of one quat > has an effect on those surrounding it, making the level of this > particular quat difficult to determine? The four-level signal was selected over a couple of three-level proposals. Remember they have to reliably distinguish an attenuated signal in the presence of crosstalk. The bit rate is 160 kbps, the baud rate (symbol rate) is 80 kbps, and the energy peak is 40 kbps. That's a lot higher than FM music, thus the shorter range. >> To make all this work, impedance is specified, with very picky >> transformers needed for S/T to meet spec. S/T uses separate transmit >> and receive wires, thus a 4-wire interface. The BRI U uses one pair, >> so there's some fancy echo cancellation done inside the transceiver >> ("UBAT", in AT&T terms) chip. Real fancy. > It seems that if the characteristic impedance of the line is > matched, there should be no "far end echo", or , at least, it should > be substantially attenuated. The "near end echo" (side tone on POTS) > seems like it could be cancelled pretty well if we precisely know the > impedance the line presents to the interface. If the far end has > indeed terminated the line with its characteristic impedance, then it > seems the near end should have the same impedance. I haven't messed > with long twisted pairs to play with the transmission line effects, > but it would sure be fun. The NEXT (near-end cross talk) is easy. The FEXT isn't terribly tough. What kills things is the junk in the middle. While ISDN lines are not supposed to have bridge taps (little stubs off the middle), the reality is that bridge taps happen. And a little bit of bridge tap creates whopping echo somewhere, which the chip tries to cancel. We actually verified (unwanted!) bridge taps on lines which were still sort of working, but not working well enough to be useful. > We sell transmitter control and telemetry equipment to radio > and television stations. They are generally using a 3002 type circuit > to send 1200 to 2400 bps full duplex data. I'm wondering what other > sort of leased line circuits they could use, and how the data could be > coded to go down that line. If all you need is remote control and telemetry, low-speed analog is fine. Most datacomm can use 56k though, especially at the same price. Digital lines are not like 3002s; they don't have the same terminators and may have different repeaters. And no bridge taps :-). Fred R. Goldstein goldstein@carafe.tay2.dec.com Opinions are mine alone; sharing requires permission ------------------------------ From: Jim.Rees@umich.edu Subject: Re: Is This Legal? Date: 12 Aug 1993 16:53:35 GMT Organization: University of Michigan CITI In article , olsen@hing.LCS.MIT.EDU (James Olsen) writes: > I summarized the FCC action on call blocking two years ago, when the > rules were issued. Full details are available in the Federal Register > of August 16, 1991 (vol. 56, no. 159), pages 40793-9 and 40844-7. I found a gopher server that has a link to the Federal Register, but the link doesn't point at anything. So someone probably has this online but I don't know how to get at it. The gopher is at gopher.netsys.com, port 2001, if anyone wants to pursue it. ------------------------------ From: gld@jambo.cc.columbia.edu (Gary L Dare) Subject: Re: Is This Legal? Date: 12 Aug 1993 17:02:37 GMT Organization: The Bloomingdale Insane Asylum (now Columbia University) padwad@psd.gs.com (Danny Padwa) writes: > Is Centrex the only service that can provide this? Harvard recently > (last three years) rebuilt its phone system (down to the local loops). I'm of the impression that "centrex" is a genericized term much like "kleenex" (i.e., after a successful brand name, starting with a capital letter). You can get excellent technicals from using PABX systems made by, say, Northern Telecom ... > They also have an interesting system for billing calls ... any call > that is chargeable (not "local" based upon the phone's calling plan) > requires the input of your PIN. > I know that Columbia has a similar policy of billing a person, > rather than a phone, for LD calls. Is this common? Yes, it's called a calling card. (-; Seriously, types of calling cards are proliferating at a wild pace and having internal ones is not that much different from using your MCI card or getting your credit card converted to an MCI card (as recently discussed). Gary L. Dare gld@columbia.EDU gld@cunixc.BITNET ------------------------------ From: atri@eecs.umich.edu (Atri Indiresan) Subject: Re: Is This Legal? Date: 12 Aug 93 15:14:11 Organization: University of Michigan In article olsen@hing.LCS.MIT.EDU (James Olsen) writes: > I summarized the FCC action on call blocking two years ago, when the > rules were issued. Full details are available in the Federal Register > of August 16, 1991 (vol. 56, no. 159), pages 40793-9 and 40844-7. [details of conditions for aggregators to provide 10XXX access deleted] I enclosed this information to the head of the U. of Michigan Telecom (UMTEL), along with this: " I have been gathering information on the legal aspects of our telephone service restrictions, and would like to know if UMTEL is in compliance with these "equal access" regulations. My understanding is that we have a rather modern switch, and there are no technical bars to providing 10xxx service, at least to the major carriers. " In his reply, he totally avoided the issue of whether the conditions of the ruling, as posted by James Olsen, were met. He said: " Yes, we have fully complied with all aspects. This provides for equal access for 0+ calls which we have always allowed. This does not refer to direct dial access. We have legal representation on this issue and adhere to all state and federal laws and tariffs. " Do the FCC regulations say anything specific about 10XXX access, or, is there legal opinion/agreement around that implies that 0+ access is good enough? 0+ access is not equal to 10XXX, but is it equal enough to satisfy the FCC? Atri ------------------------------ From: pjoslin@mbvlab.wpafb.af.mil (Paul Joslin (Sverdrup)) Subject: Re: Is This Legal? Date: 12 Aug 1993 12:57:17 GMT Organization: Model Based Vision Lab, Wright Laboratory In article , Gang Zhou (gzhou@pollux.usc. edu) wrote: > In article Bonnie J Johnson > writes: >> If some schools, by older switch design can not provide basic 10xxxx > USC is setting up the phone system right now, so it must be a new > system, but they don't provide basic 10xxxx. >> access, they CAN provide basically the same freedom by obtaining the >> 800 number for major carriers and advertising that number to its > We can use the calling card via the 800 number for major carriers. It > seams that USC has done its part of "equal access", right? But it's > still not fair, or equal, because calling card bears a surcharge > .75/1.75 for every call. Another interesting change is that Universities may have to file tariffs. Apparently, AT&T filed suit against the FCC, saying that the FCC policy requiring only the "dominant" carrier (i.e. AT&T) to file tariffs was illegal. A court agreed with them, and MCI was also forced to file tariffs. AT&T sued MCI and the FCC, saying the MCI tariffs were vague, and succeeded in forcing MCI to file more detailed tariffs. According to Network World, the result of the suit may be that all providers, from MCI and Sprint through aggregators, hotels and universities, may have to file. The FCC is challenging the ruling. Paul R. Joslin +1 513 255 1115 ------------------------------ From: ken thompson Subject: Re: Hotel Rip-Off - Is This a Record? Date: 12 Aug 93 13:26:00 GMT Organization: NCR Corporation Wichita, KS John.Slater@UK.Sun.COM (John Slater) writes: > I have just had the dubious pleasure of staying for a couple of weeks > at the Hyatt Regency Alicante in Anaheim, California. Being an avid > Who needs COCOTs when hotels rip us off so effectively? The phoney companies need rate approvals for their charges. ( Why they call them trariffs still I do not understand.) How can the hotels get away with what they do? It seems as if consumer agencies would go after them. Ken Thompson N0ITL Disk Array Hardware Development Peripheral Products MPD-Wichita NCR Corp. an AT&T company 3718 N. Rock Road Wichita,Ks 67226 (316) 636-8783 Ken.Thompson@wichitaks.ncr.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 12:40:03 CST From: Greg Abbott Reply-To: gabbott@uiuc.edu Subject: Re: Hotel Rip-Off - Is This a Record? John.Slater@UK.Sun.COM (John Slater) wrote: > I have just had the dubious pleasure of staying for a couple of weeks > at the Hyatt Regency Alicante in Anaheim, California. Being an avid > TELECOM Digest reader, I went straight to the rate card by the phone > even before I unpacked my case. > Even by British hotel standards (typically 400% mark-up on BT's > standard unit charge), the Hyatt was extortionate. Consider what they > charge for international calls: > Operator-assisted rates (even though the call is direct-dialled) > PLUS a $2.50 access charge per call! > PLUS 45c per minute!! Just as a side note, I recently complained to the Chicago Hilton Towers regarding their policy to charge $1 for each local and 800 number call. I received a telephone call from their Telecommuni- cations Manager to inform me that she had forwarded my complaint to someone at the corporate level. It seems they had been receiving numerous complaints regarding this policy. Based on these complaints, a new policy was issued by corporate to eliminate this charge. I guess it does do some good to complain occasionally! GREG ABBOTT E-MAIL: GABBOTT@UIUC.EDU 9-1-1 COORDINATOR COMPUSERVE MAIL: 76046,3107 VOICE: 217/333-4348 METCAD FAX: 217/384-7003 1905 E. MAIN ST. PAGER: 800/222-6651 URBANA, IL 61801 PIN # 9541 ------------------------------ From: djcl@io.org (woody) Subject: Re: Error Rates For 2400 Baud Modems Date: 12 Aug 1993 02:42:27 GMT Organization: Internex Online - Toronto, Canada (416) 363-3783 In article mcmahan@netcom.com (Dave Mc Mahan) writes: > I am currently trying to design yet another phone modem protocol that > is capable of handling some unique requirements of my product. After > looking at the various standard modem protocols out there, I have > found that none will be able to fulfill all the objectives I need. > This is mainly due to lack of efficiency (Kermit and XMODEM fall into > this category) or inability to pass data in two directions at the same > time (ZMODEM falls into this category). To make a long story short, a > unique protocol is required. There are protocols available in the BBS world that will send data in both directions concurrently. The first well-known one was Bi-Modem, and the recent protocol (with an open approach to protocol specs) is Hydra. With Bi-Modem, and I think also Hydra, there is even an added facility to allow for a "chat" channel while the transfer is taking place; ie. a fraction of the bandwidth can be dedicated to on line communication between a user and sysop, say. I believe the file transfer activity is fairly continuous in both directions, akin to Zmodem. However, these may not be the only protocols, and hopefully the protocol you specified will be useful for the task at hand. David Leibold ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 12:37:28 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM Subject: Re: Error Rates For 2400 Baud Modems From: Paul Robinson Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA > I am currently trying to design yet another phone modem protocol > that is capable of handling some unique requirements of my product. > After looking at the various standard modem protocols out there, I > have found that none will be able to fulfill all the objectives I > need. This is mainly due to lack of efficiency (Kermit and XMODEM > fall into this category) or inability to pass data in two > directions at the same time (ZMODEM falls into this category). To > make a long story short, a unique protocol is required. Have you checked on the Bimodem protocol? It's either from Vern Buerg or S.H. Smith, I forget which. > I have specified a protocol that will do the job. My problem lies > in the fact that I don't have good data on types of errors that > occur when going through the public telephone network. This means > I can't pick the optimal message packet size to trade off protocol > efficiency versus retransmit probability. I would like input from > you as to where I can find this data. Find a copy of Chuck Forsberg's 1987 specifications and source code (both in the public domain) explaining how Zmodem works and why it was developed. What you do is pick an 'optimum' size buffer based on how much data would be transmitted in a stream and how fast the receiver can handle it. At 300 baud, it might be 128 bytes; at 1200, 1K; 2400, 2 or 4K; and at 9600, 8K. If there is an error, you tell the receiver to back up to some point earlier in the transmission which is 'known good'. This is done by a CRC. You keep count of the number of errors. If the number of errors starts to rise above a 'threshhold' then you reduce the number of bytes sent in a packet to a smaller amount, e.g. you 'throttle down' the packet size. If the errors stay low, you can try slowly increasing the size of the packet until you start getting errors. Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 06:56:47 GMT From: andrew@herald.usask.ca (Derek Andrew) Subject: Re: Another Look at Alex Bell (was Re: Handsets; Hearing Impaired) Reply-To: andrew@herald.usask.ca Organization: University of Saskatchewan > Alex Bell was not a teacher for the deaf, he was the centerforce of > mainstreaming the deaf and destroying their unique culture, to clear > up with a myth, if it ever was one. To the deaf, he was the ultimate > person of intolerance and oppression. I took a sign language course recently and the instructore explained the debate about 'deaf culture' to me. The pro-deaf culture stance is that there is a unique culture among the deaf which is propogated by being with other deaf people and using sign language. It is a culture as powerful as any racial culture. They want to keep it. The anti-deaf culture stance is that by continuing to promote sign language rather than teaching lip reading, we are isolating the deaf from the hearing culture. It prevents the deaf from integrating into the larger hearing culture. Imagine if you only spoke Spanish and tried to function in an English only environment, but were not capable of learning even a few English words (like STOP or DANGER). The politics were highlighted during the recent closing of the only school for the deaf in this city. The students were distributed to regular schools and given aids to assist in learning how to function in the hearing community. The main discussions did not concentrate on the benefits to the students, but rather on the loss of the centre of the deaf community. It was the adults that were going to suffer, not the students! I wanted to send in this submission to show that there is another side to destroying the deaf culture -- and it can be considered positive. Derek.Andrew@USask.CA ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #565 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa04313; 12 Aug 93 20:51 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA04176 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 18:06:24 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA18068 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 18:05:45 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 18:05:45 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308122305.AA18068@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #566 TELECOM Digest Thu, 12 Aug 93 18:05:45 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 566 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Status of Cellular Data (Robert Rosenberg) Re: Status of Cellular Data (Erik Ramberg) Re: Status of Cellular Data (Lynne Gregg) Re: Modem/Data Tax - Technically Possible (John R. Levine) Re: Modem/Data Tax - Technically Possible (Jan Ceuleers) Re: Modem/Data Tax - Technically Possible (Vance Shipley) Re: ATT Truevoice (David G. Lewis) Re: ATT Truevoice (Al Varney) Re: NXX Report: July 1993 (Trenton del Rey Gallowglass) Re: Who/What Determines Call (Vance Shipley) Re: Leftover Drops (Richard Thomsen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 17:10:14 EDT From: Robert Rosenberg Subject: Re: Status of Cellular Data > Can anyone post an update on what's going on in the world of cellular > data? I used to assume that wireless data connectivity would evolve > out of alphanumeric pager service, but I gather that the cellular > voice carriers are gearing up to soak up their spare bandwidth by > providing cellular packet data. > Is this right? How's it going? When can I expect to have affordable > two-way email from my laptop? I know about Embarc et al, but it is SOOOO > expensive. It currently appears to be far cheaper per byte to use a > cellular phone and modem than to use the alpha-pager services and that > seems crazy. Anybody know what's coming down in this area? Our recent study of wireless data transport suggests that cellular is indeed live and well, but there are a number of technology options that must be assessed. Specialized mobile radio (SMR) is being developed as a digital cellular-telephone technology. Though some industry experts maintain that data business opportunities are less pressing than those for voice, others are moving aggressively to provide data services or combined voice and data services via SMR frequencies. The reality is that in 1993 more cars and trucks have SMR than have cellular telephones-though this a service that is arguably lower in quality than cellular (measured by both transmission quality and fraction of call attempts that are blocked because of no available channels), lower in functionality (limited connectivity to the public switched telephone network as well as to other customers), but also lower in cost. Wireless data communications will find a market using SMR frequencies, as a packet-radio overlay technology atop voice services. We expect to see dial-up cellular-telephone modems become increasingly popular as a cellular telephone with dial-up data and fax modem becomes a standard option on laptop or notebook PCs. The costs associated with building wireless modems will slide down the cost curve-in part because of the trend toward nomadic computing and growth in the cellular-telephone network. These devices will function on either a wireline or a wireless network, though the typical applications will be to fax or to dial into a terrestrial wireline network. However, Insight analysis suggests that the cost of dial-up cellular-telephone service could make more cost-effective packet-radio services the preferred mode for wireless data communications in the next five years. Packet-radio maps beautifully to data communications: it involves sharing a scarce resource-radio spectrum-among many different users. The packet-radio paradigm is assumed to be relatively bursty-typically, an interactive terminal/host session actually will send or receive information only 0.1 percent of the time or less. The business question is will packet radio evolve via standalone networks-such as Ardis and Ram Mobile Data, which employ SMR frequencies to handle data alone-or will it piggyback off the capital-equipment outlay for voice wireless network. If piggybacking makes the better business case, will packet radio evolve using guard bands in cellular network frequencies or via transmission over unused frequencies in the cellular analog voice network, as adopted by the backers of the cellular digital packet data (CDPD) protocols? The key issue here is ease of use, which in part translates into coverage. Cellular-telephone networks already have greater geographic coverage than SMR networks; hence the lower cost approach to wireless data is to share costs with a voice cellular-telephone service providers. Because of the open nature of the CDPD consortium formed by McCaw, GTE Cellular, Sprint, and six of the seven RBOCs, the willingness to publish an architecture, and to make the technology available to all interested parties, Insight's analysis suggests success for the CDPD consortium. Open systems rewrote the rules in the computer industry in the 1980s and will continue to dominate computing and telecommunications the 1990s. By way of contrast, those backing cellular data via guard bands expect to reap profits from locking customers into proprietary technologies and interfaces, an approach out of step with present realities. Bob Rosenberg Insight Research Corporation bob@insight-corp.com ------------------------------ From: esl!SMTP!erik_ramberg@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Erik Ramberg) Subject: Re: Status of Cellular Data Date: 12 Aug 93 21:24:38 GMT Organization: ESL Inc. In article , Jim.Rees@umich.edu wrote: > Then there's GSM, the non-US digital cellular system of the future. > It's been deployed in a few places, and I think it has provisions for > data, but I don't know much more about it. It's unlikely to be > deployed in the US, since it wasn't invented here and can optionally > use encryption, which our government would like to outlaw. Of more importance is the fact that GSM is not working at full capacity due to technical problems..this includes the frequency hopping portion of the protocol. Supposidly the problems are most pronounced in large valleys. (i.e. multipath) FYI GSM is not rated to be of higher capacity than the current US AMPS standard. The government is not totally opposed to encryption...take alook at the CDMA system ... it uses encryption. hmmmmm ... Erik Nothing that I say can be construed as the opinion of my employer. ------------------------------ From: Lynne Gregg Subject: Re: Status of Cellular Data Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 10:00:00 PDT Aside from work on CDPD (cellular packet data communications), cellular networks are used extensively for voice, data, and fax communications. You'll find a range of PC modems that are designed for use with cellular networks (containing added error correction and compression). If you have specific Q's on using cellular for your voice, data, or fax communications -- AND optimizing communications, I'd be happy to help. Regards, Lynne P.S. This was brought to you over McCaw's North American Cellular Network (Cellular One) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 12:33 EDT From: johnl@iecc.com (John R Levine) Subject: Re: Modem/Data Tax - Technically Possible Organization: I.E.C.C. Hey, aren't we all missing what the point of the "modem tax" was? The FCC has a well-defined set of connection protocols between local telcos and long distance carriers, known as feature groups A through D. All normal long distance carriers use them, and pay per minute charges for both origination and termination of about five cents per minute. The 1987 proposal simply was going to treat long haul data carriers like Telenet and Compuserve (which is as much a network company as an on-line service) the same way as long haul voice carriers. People got very upset, since the locals telcos would be charging a couple of dollars an hour for incoming calls, same as they do to AT&T or Sprint. The FCC backed off, so data networks hook up like business POTS customers, not like long distance carriers. There was a small fully of excitement a few months ago about whether local telcos should be compelled to provide new features to data carriers at the lower rate. The answer seems to be no, but they can keep their POTS lines forever. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, {spdcc|ima|world}!iecc!johnl ------------------------------ From: Jan.Ceuleers@k12.be (Jan Ceuleers) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 18:23:22 Subject: Modem/Data Tax - Technically Possible Organization: K12 Belgium (S-Team) I quote david.g.lewis: > I'd submit that bandwidth is sufficiently cheap -- for a carrier -- > that the processing necessary to recognize a signal as data, determine > which modem standard is being used, connect the line to a modem of > that type, run that through a subrate mux/demux, and put the whole > thing on a data network -- at both ends of the connection -- is > nowhere near economical. And I'd submit that it's also impossible or at least impractical. Many modems don't emit the CNG tone (a tone produced by automatic equipment after dialing and while waiting for carrier; such as fax machines), so that the carrier would have to listen for the 2100 Hz answer tone. (Admittedly, this is already done for the purpose of disabling echo cancellers). However, at that time, it doesn't yet know whether this is a fax or a modem call. Even assuming you know it's a modem call, you don't know which protocol until it's fully negotiated. And still, how do you know the protocol is fully negotiated? For example, HST modems first connect using V.22bis and then switch to HST mode (I think). The carrier would then have to break the speech path and introduce modems at either end, already in the 'connected' state, without causing loss of carrier. This *might* be possible, but I think it'd cause more grief than it'd be worth. Jan Origin: Experimenter Board, Antwerp, Belgium (2:292/857) ------------------------------ From: Vance Shipley Subject: Re: Modem/Data Tax - Technically Possible Organization: XeniTec Consulting Services, Kitchener, Ontario Canada Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 01:22:16 GMT In Canada to avoid paying contribution charges which only apply to voice networks a carrier must have a mechanism in place to detect, and disconnect a voice call. Unitel have used this for years on their "Facsroute" service. If there is no carrier tone on the line within 70 seconds they will disconnect the call. I used to get calls from users of their Broadband service that would consistently be disconnected. The CRTC's regulations at the time only allowed for private line use of Broadband for voice. You could however make a PSTN bound call and be tarrifed under Facsroute. The PBXs were supposed to keep the voice users from accessing Facsroute. In these cases a routing problem in their PBX was allowing their voice calls on to the Broadband lines and out to Unitel's (then CNCP) PSTN access. Vance Shipley, vances@xenitec.on.ca ------------------------------ From: deej@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (david.g.lewis) Subject: Re: ATT Truevoice Organization: AT&T Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 17:38:02 GMT In article ken thompson writes: > Someone mentioned their impressions of Truevoice. Lows boosted and > overall volumne increased. > Is not bandwidth needed to transmit a signal related to the bandwidth > of the information in that signal. And if they reduce the highs, and > the bandwidth requirements, does not let them get more voice channels > into a given digital transmition channel? You're confusing frequency with amplitude. The bandwidth required to transmit a signal is a function of the overall bandwidth of the signal, not the amplitude of the signal at any given frequency. If you increase or decrease the amplitude across the frequency band or a subset of the frequency band without affecting the overall bandwidth of the signal, you don't change the transmission bandwidth required (provided you don't exceed the limits of the channel in any other way, such as boosting the signal level beyond the capacity of the channel to handle it). Furthermore, I don't think anyone has claimed that TrueVoice (TM) is *reducing* anything, even amplitude; although boosting the level at the low end of the frequency range will make the high end sound relatively quieter, that's perceptive acoustics, not actual volume reduction ... > Is not this marketing getting people ready for the distorted sound > quality as this carrier crams more voices on a wire? No, because you don't cram more voices on a wire -- you're getting the same digital trunk you always got. > Will not high speed modems have trouble with this distored channel, > switch to slower speeds automaticaly and maybe unknown to the user, > and spend more time connected to get their data through? No, because (a) as we've established (which I note CommWeek picked up on a few weeks ago), the tone to disable echo control will disable TrueVoice, and (b) the same bandwidth is available anyway. > Am I too cynical? Yes. David G Lewis AT&T Bell Laboratories david.g.lewis@att.com or !att!goofy!deej Switching & ISDN Implementation ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 14:00:45 CDT From: varney@ihlpe.att.com Subject: Re: ATT Truevoice Organization: AT&T Disclaimer: I know nothing about AT&T TrueVoice(sm) implementation except what I've read in the public press and non-proprietary news releases. In article ken thompson writes: > Someone mentioned their impressions of Truevoice. Lows boosted and > overall volumne increased. > Is not bandwidth needed to transmit a signal related to the bandwidth > of the information in that signal. And if they reduce the highs, and > the bandwidth requirements, does not let them get more voice channels > into a given digital transmission channel? If you want to throw out fifteen years worth of digital transmission equipment in order to re-slice the 1.544MHz T1 line channels, I guess this would be possible -- but the cost would probably be greater than the cost of just running more fiber. I don't believe most large carriers need more voice channels -- the trade press believes there's plenty of fiber out there ... One thing to remember about digital switches is that they are all "tuned" to switch 64Kbps PCM signals. Since one of the major savings of such switches is the ability to directly terminate DS1 and higher rate signals, and switch the individual channels internally. In order to "re-slice" the signals without replacing the switches ($$$$$$), some form of "front-end" would have to sit between the switch and the fiber/transmission network, reshuffling the "compressed" bit stream into switch-compatible DS1 signals. This would cost $$$ and also eliminate much of the advantage of the direct DS1 interface. And even more important, you took the phrase "lows boosted" and seemed to assume that implied 1) highs were reduced and 2) less bandwidth was needed. This is incorrect, as I understand it. Instead, think of it as just selectively amplifying voice using the existing bandwidth. Similar things happen in Dolby(tm) noise reduction and "graphic" equalizers in automobiles, or in radio station equipment that puts more "punch" in their limited bandwidth. There are many ("purists"??) that object that all of the above alter voice/music in ways that "distort" natural sound. Remember the vinyl vs. CD debate? The transistor vs. tube amplifier debate? > Is not this marketing getting people ready for the distorted sound > quality as this carrier crams more voices on a wire? But 80% of one consumer test group "preferred" the TrueVoice enhanced sound quality. So far as I can tell, there is no "cramming" of more voices on a wire. If that's what they wanted to do, why not just keep the same "sound"? > Will not high speed modems have trouble with this distored channel, > switch to slower speeds automaticaly and maybe unknown to the user, > and spend more time connected to get their data through? I've been told that non-voice (modem, FAX, etc.) signals will not be affected. Just one aside: I seen some state that Tom's (you know, Mr. Selleck) voice for the TrueVoice demo was recorded through microphones/special equipment to make the difference sound even better. NOPE. He made a trip to record his voice at Bell Labs in Holmdel, NJ (not a studio). He spoke through a "regular consumer telephone set" over a regular AT&T switched network connection into an AT&T Conversant(tm) voice response system. You hear, as close as possible, what Tom would sound like if he called you over a TrueVoice connection. (summarized from Bell Labs News article.) > Am I too cynical? Hard to say -- do you think OS/2(tm) is a plot to sell memory chips? Do you think UNIX(tm of BTL/AT&T/USL/????) is a plot to sell memory AND hard drives? That "multi-media"(tm unknown) is a plot to sell memory/ hard drives/CPUs/monitors AND lots of peripherals? Al Varney - just MY OPINION, not anything official ------------------------------ From: trenton@netcom.com (Trenton del Rey Gallowglass) Subject: Re: NXX Report: July 1993 Organization: The Monastary for Reclusive Monks Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 22:20:37 GMT David Esan (de@moscom.com) wrote: > This is no longer our procedure. The information in FCC #10 is now > detailed enough that we no longer need to order the tape from BellCore > and are using FCC #10 for our V&H information. What is FCC #10? Trenton trenton@netcom.com ------------------------------ From: Vance Shipley Subject: Re: Who/What Determines Call Organization: XeniTec Consulting Services, Kitchener, Ontario Canada Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 00:56:33 GMT In article tim gorman <71336.1270@Compu Serve.COM> writes: > If you actually have an ISDN phone that is showing a name, it would be > interesting to see how it is being implemented. I have a Meridian 5209 set on my desk. This is a DMS centrex business set with several lines and display. It is part of a large centrex my company has in downtown Toronto. The other day I called a friend at Northern Telecom in Mississauga and lo and behold his first and last name popped up on my phone! I had never seen a name on the phone before, only trunk group identifiers. I wouldn't have been so impressed if I didn't know their setup. I would have assumed he was also a centrex user. The real situation is that he has an extension on a Meridian 1 PBX with a primary rate access to the CO (Bell Canada's MegaLink service). Apparently the PBX is sending the CPND, (Northern's Calling Party Name Display) across the PRA to Bell. OK so this wasn't exactly 'an ISDN phone' but it's close :) Incidently Bell Canada has "Number Replacement" available which allows you to specify which number to send as the Calling Line ID. You may use the number of any line you have in the same NXX. How you would normally use this is by having all the outgoing trunk lines of your PBX send the main listed number of your PBX as the CLID. This actually makes CLASS features like Call Return work with PBXs. There is no recurring charge for Number Replacement and no setup charge if you order it when you order your lines. Remember to ask for this when ordering lines in the future! Vance Shipley, vances@xenitec.on.ca ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 08:57:14 -0600 From: rgt@spitfire.lanl.gov (Richard Thomsen) Subject: Re: Leftover Drops In an article about "multiple plant" in urban areas, Pat says: > None of those big old wooden cabinets have locks on them; you just > lift the wooden front up and out of the way. Most people do not even > realize that between themselves and the CO may be five or six places > the pair can be jumped -- just look in the basement of the building > down the street. I should start a school and teach the general public > about their phone service. Bell would hate me for it. :) PAT] Most of us poor fools are at the mercy of the telephone company. I keep hearing stories of people getting fraudulent calls on their bills, and TPC says "It must be your call, as it is your wire." Is there any definitive evidence that someone can post or something to help us fight fraudulent calls on telephone bills? Something to take to the PUC or court or whatever, so that when TPC uses its "direct wire" argument, it can be countered? Of course, I suppose this "evidence" can be used to fraudulently get out of paying for legitimate calls, so it could work both ways. I have no answers, but do have sympathy for the innocent party on either side. I have not (yet) been victimized by this, but I can see these big green posts sticking up all over my area that I know contain all the wires for the telephone system. It would be trivial to open one of these, attach clip wires to a line, and make telephone calls. And I would not even have to go to a neighbor's house to use the wires where they enter. Richard Thomsen Los Alamos National Laboratory rgt@lanl.gov ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #566 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa05492; 12 Aug 93 21:48 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA10305 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 19:23:41 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA16571 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 19:23:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 19:23:02 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308130023.AA16571@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #567 TELECOM Digest Thu, 12 Aug 93 19:23:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 567 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Cell Phone Fraud and New Systems (David Boettger) Re: Reflections on Hacker Sentencing (Anonymous-3) Re: Unrequested Remote Call Forwarding (Danny Burstein) Re: MCI PC Connect Plan (Eight Cents/Min Evening/Night/Week) (Hallikainen) Re: MCI PC Connect Plan (Eight Cents/Min Evening/Night/Week) (A. Gallatin) Re: Caller-ID Software Wanted (Paul Robinson) Re: Caller-ID Across LATAs? (John R. Levine) Re: Inter-LATA Caller*ID Arrives in NJ (Paul Guthrie) Re: *69 as Caller-ID? (Arthur Rubin) Re: About Caller-ID Blocking in Virginia (John Boteler) Caller-ID in Kentucky (Baron Chandler) Re: 800 Alternatives and Billing (Mike King) Re: Central Office Tours? (Steven H. Lichter) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 07:58:00 From: David Boettger Subject: Re: Cell Phone Fraud and New Systems Jon Allen writes: > The interesting part is that they said that next year, Cellular One > would be converting over to a digital system which would solve the > problem. I am curious if anyone knows more about this specifically. > There must be some way to phase in the digital system so as that both > the old and new systems are active at the same time. Do they share > the same radio frequencies? If so, the system must somehow recognize > the different phones. Or is this whole story just media hype? I was > thinking about buying a cell phone, but if the current phones will be > obsolete in a year, it seems wise to wait. Your analog phone will be useful for a long time. 'Converting over' to digital is really not what is going to happen. 'Phasing in' is more like it. TDMA digital cellular (IS-54B) uses the same frequencies that AMPS does. A cell could potentially use certain channels in digital mode and certain channels in analog mode simultaneously (a 'hybrid' cell). In fact, that's probably the way it will normally work. (Ob. plug for employer: The Northern Telecom Dual-mode Radio Unit can switch from analog mode to digital mode and back on-the-fly.) I believe that Cellular One uses Ericsson stuff, so analog cell radios will have to be replaced with digital-only ones, thus preventing an analog user from ever using that frequency in that cell. All TDMA mobile phones are dual-mode: They can switch between analog and digital modes on a per-call basis. Though the same frequencies are allocated for analog and digital cellular, the two have totally different modulation schemes; of course the system recognizes the different phones. Fraud protection is much better in TDMA cellular. Privacy is also better, but if you want secure communication, don't go wireless. David Boettger boettger@bnr.ca The preceding opinions are my own and not the opinions of Northern Telecom or Bell Northern Research. ------------------------------ From: Anonymous-3 Subject: Re: Reflections on Hacker Sentencing Organization: Not Relevant Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 15:51:48 GMT Pat, I'm not sure how to handle this -- I'd like to respond as below to the original poster, but wouldn't like to let some of the information out. If someone read the below and knew my company, the identity of the "cracker" would be clear, and I wouldn't like to be responsible for the treatment of him following that ... If it can be posted anonmously please do so, else please don't post at all. [Moderator's Note: Okay, one last time around on this. Here we go. PAT] In article Anonymous (telecom@eecs. nwu.edu) writes: > I'm done with probation and my community service (computer-related, of > course), and I'm going to be entering my third year of college -- > majoring in computer engineering. I don't know how I'm ever going to > find a job, with this felony looming in my past. I'm unsure if I'll be > able to get it expunged, because there is no precident. What > corporation would want to hire a convicted felon as an engineer? I might. I have on my staff a fellow that was popped for cracking a system, and for causing damage to files on that system when being hunted by some sysadmins. I figured that he had done his time and paid the price, and since he's a talented programmer I've given him a job. I suspect that most of the duties here have been interesting enough to occupy his time, and he's not engaging in cracking any longer. 'Course, if I find out he's still cracking I'll come down on him so hard he'll wish he'd never heard of cracking ... Anyway, sufficient talent and some demonstration of a willingness to work can overcome a lot of old problems. BTW: when he came here he thought we'd never heard of his past cracking experiences -- I'd heard enough of them to understand that it was mostly a case of raging hormones that got out of control, and likely something I could've done myself. I can't give much more detail or give away the whole thing, but the only cost was some sysadmin time and some pulled hair. I'd not be likely to hire someone that caused serious damage or loss. > Who was the real criminal in all of this? Yes, I committed a crime, > and it appears that I may have to pay for it for the rest of my life. > Meanwhile, the person who works for Equifax who initially released the > account information that let us IN the system in the first place is > probably still working there. (No, I have no idea who this person > was). Personal note: stay away from this train of thought -- it's too close to the "blame someone else" thinking that seems to pervade much of society anymore, and close to the "he left the door unlocked" argument used by burglars. It doesn't wash. ------------------------------ From: dannyb@panix.com (danny burstein) Subject: Re: Unrequested Remote Call Forwarding Date: 12 Aug 1993 18:49:25 -0400 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC In Paul Robinson <0005066432@MCIMAIL. COM> writes: > A posting on the Risks list discussed how an inmate at a state > penetentiary was able to get some private party's phone to be enabled > with Remote Call Forwarding (RCF), AND got someone from the phone > company to give them the security code over the phone. > It's been said on TELECOM Digest several times that inmates in prisons > make calls that have to be made collect only. Are they referring to > the phones provided by the correctional facility or are the pay phones > set up so they cannot place calls other than collect? > If prison pay phones can only call collect, then the person that did > this had to have an outsider do this, or they had to be calling an 800 > number (can prison phones call 1-800 numbers? If not, how do they > call their lawyer if he has one?) When I first saw this note on Risks-Digest, I caught quite a few problems in it (and sent off a respnse to them as well.) Highlights: the posting is a reprint of an article in a newspaper, and in it, the homeowner states that he became suspicious when his phone would give lots of "single rings." Usually when he picked it up, all he got wa a dial-tone. However, on one occassion he was quick enough and got a recording saying something like: "collect call from xyz prison, this call will be monitored, do you accept ..." Problems with all of this: a) the single ring durign call forwarding is ONLY an alert that call forwarding is in effect. Picking up the phone, even at that instant, will NOT hook you into the call. b) The aformentioned bit about the prisoners not being able to reset the RCf since they can't make the calls. c) All such RCF commands are stored by the telco. While it may not be up to the standards of legal/criminal proof, it is certainly adequate for screening purposes. BTW, there is one possible addition to all this. (Assuming any of this stuff is true), the inmates could have had someone on the outside setting up the rcf, with the instructions being that "Jim" calls out at 15:00-15:15, "Tom" at 15:30-15:45, etc. This -might- explain the abilityoto pick up the call (i.e., if "Tom" called a few minutes early ...) Take care, dannyb@panix.com ------------------------------ From: hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) Subject: Re: MCI PC Connect Plan (Eight Cents/Min Evening/Night/Weekend) Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 03:47:59 GMT Am I correct in guessing that MCI is demodulating the modem data at the first opportunity, then dropping it into their network as digital data instead of digitized audio which was previously modulated with a digital signal? If so, I'd suspect rates should be more bit sensitive and less connect time sensitive (other than tying up their modem ports), but maybe they just have a modem connect time charge and are giving away the data transport? Also, what shows up at the member BBS? Do they get a bunch of POTS lines with remodulated modem data? Seems like they otta get a single digital circuit (DS0 on up) with all the user data packetized and muxed down the one circuit. This would save the BBS from having to put in all those modems and serial ports. Harold ------------------------------ From: amg@acpub.duke.edu (Alan M. Gallatin) Subject: Re: MCI PC Connect Plan (Eight Cents/Min Evening/Night/Weekend) Date: 12 Aug 93 13:06:20 GMT Organization: Duke University; Durham, North Carolina USA In a previous article, st1r8@elroy.uh.edu (B.J. Guillot) wrote: > MCI PC Connect(sm) FEE/RATES: > ============================= > - $3.00 monthly fee (does not apply towards usage) > PC Connect Customer to NON-PC Connect Customer: > ----------------------------------------------- > $0.22 during Day (Mon-Fri: 8am - 5pm) > $0.10 during E/N/W (Mon-Fri: 5pm-8am: Sat/Sun: 24 hours) > PC Connect Customer to PC Connect Customer: > ------------------------------------------- > $.176 during Day > $.08 during E/N/W > Friends & Family discount does not apply to fee > For an additional $1.50 per month, MCI PC Connect customers can include > in-state calls at the same MCI PC Connect plan rates as above. This is a nice deal, but really nothing special to MCI dial-one customers. MCI currently as a normal plan called "Easy Rate" which runs $3/month and, like above, charges $.22/min day, $.10/min E/N/W -- the discount charges to a PC Connect Customer seems to take the place of a F&F discount as the quoted rates are 20% less. Now, if someone called more than 20 BBS's which were PC Connect, that would be great as a F&F list would not get strained. The real question here is: if you get PC Connect, does F&F still apply to your voice calls? If not, it is time to start working out the tradeoffs -- if so, then people using Easy Rate should just simply switch. Also, for all interested people (as a side note): MCI recently launched a new dial plan without any significant advertising. "Any Time" is a variation of AT&T's "Any Hour." $9.90/month gets you $.20/min day and $.11/min E/N/W -- The $9.90 gets you an hour which takes day calls first. There are exactly three differences between this and AT&T: 1) AT&T's plan costs $10 (instead of $9.90) for same rates 2) MCI will give F&F discounts on calls under this plan 3) AT&T offers an additional $2 calling card option which gives a flat 20% off of calling card calls. Hope this helps! Alan M. Gallatin Personal Student, Duke Law School UJA or AJIN Durham, NC USA Jerusalem 1 ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 08:29:55 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM> Subject: Re: Caller-ID Software Wanted From: Paul Robinson Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA Steve Taylor writes: > I am interested in computer software that displays incoming > telephone numbers on my computer screen. Caller-ID was just > introduced in my area and I'm interested in a package to utilize > it. I have received many posts as to hardware like Supra's modem > that displays it, but I'm interested in software. Thanks for your > help. And exactly how are you getting the information? Generally you need some form of hardware to deliver it to a computer. Since the caller-id information is sent as a data signal, the usual device that reads it is a modem. Therefore the most common way is as a set of characters delivered to a serial port on a PC. Any program that can obtain information from the serial ports on a PC will be able to read it. Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 10:33 EDT From: johnl@iecc.com (John R Levine) Subject: Re: Caller-ID Across LATAs? Organization: I.E.C.C. > Such a corridor does exist, but must be used explicitly, and does not > reach 201. There's a corridor between New York City and most of 201 just like the one between Phila and the Camden area. You use 10NJB or 10NYT. Most telco payphones have been programmed to stuff 10NJB on applicable calls unless overridden by a customer 10XXX. I have no idea if CLID is passed to or from NYC. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, {spdcc|ima|world}!iecc!johnl ------------------------------ From: pdg@access.digex.net (Paul Guthrie) Subject: Re: Inter-LATA Caller*ID Arrives in NJ Date: 12 Aug 1993 11:57:24 -0400 Organization: The League of Crafty Hackers In article dave@westmark.com (Dave Levenson) writes: > In early July, we began seeing area codes other than 908 and 201 on > our Caller*ID display. For the first time since the service was > offered in the state, we also began seeing an occasional "PRIVATE > NUMBER" display. > Some experimentation has shown that inter-LATA calls carried by Cable > & Wireless to our 800 number are the only ones that deliver these > out-of-area numbers. Calls dialed to our 908 number via AT&T, MCI, > and US-SPRINT still arrive as OUT OF AREA. This information, while normally available in the IXCs network because of CCS, is not transfered to the terminating operating company simply because the IXC has no incentive to, not because of any technical restrictions. Bellcore is currently soliciting stakeholders from interested parties to petition the FCC to force the IXCs to provide this information to the terminating operating companies. Seemingly C&W has seen the way of things to come and has started passing this info along. > It would appear that the arrival of 800 portability coincided > (approximately, at any rate) with the arrival of intra-LATA Caller*ID > on 800 calls. Is this a coincidence or not? 800 portability forced the IXCs to connect their CCS networks with the RBOCs and independants. If C&W was not previously so connected, then this might have been the driving force. Certainly, CCS connectivity in the big three was very widespread even before portability. Paul Guthrie pdg@vorpal.digex.net paul@nsacray.chi.il.us ------------------------------ Subject: Re: *69 as Caller-ID? From: a_rubin%dsg4.dse.beckman.com (Arthur Rubin) Date: 12 Aug 93 17:54:59 GMT Reply-To: a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (Arthur Rubin) In hansen@inference.com (Rob Hansen) writes: > As you probably know, Caller-ID is not available in California. > I do not have Call*Return. My question is this: If I call "John Doe" > who uses Call*Return on me, will the system read my number back to > him? Assuming it won't and isn't allowed to, what happens if I'm far > enough away from John that I the call costs him money? Will my number > show up on his phone bill? If it will, isn't this a violation of the > rules? According to PacBell's insert, the last four digits of the number will be X'd out on (his) phone bill. (John Higdon reported he would refuse to pay that portion of the phone bill. I have not heard anything else from him.) Arthur L. Rubin: a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (work) Beckman Instruments/Brea 216-5888@mcimail.com 70707.453@compuserve.com arthur@pnet01.cts.com (personal) My opinions are my own, and do not represent those of my employer. ------------------------------ From: bote@access.digex.net (John Boteler) Subject: Re: About Caller-ID Blocking in Virginia Date: 12 Aug 1993 17:00:33 -0400 Organization: Express Access Public Access UNIX, Greenbelt, Maryland USA 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM writes: > Since I [thought] that Caller-ID blocking is not available in Virginia, Caller*ID blocking has been available in Virginia for over two months. bote@access.digex.net (John Boteler) ------------------------------ From: Baron Chandler Subject: Caller-ID in Kentucky Date: 12 Aug 93 13:45:06 CDT Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY After getting off the phone with SouthCentral Bell, I find that they have enabled long-distance connections with caller ID. Louisville, KY, and Frankfort, KY (same area code, about 60 miles apart) have been merged as well as a few other smaller areas. Rather amazing, for Kentucky -- but our governor has decided that we'll have a state-wide fiberoptic network in place within 18 months ... (I am biting my tongue but I am not holding my breath!) I did get a very strange fluke one day -- recieved a 212 area code call "supposedly" anyway. But it wasn't at all. We were somewhat surprised to see an area code on the 'box'... but it was just a neighbor calling. Wonder how it got thru the error checking? Also, some 800 numbers are able to retrieve your phone number. General Motors (1800-4-a-buick) for example. Could someone explain how this is achieved. Is this what is known as ISDN Source Telephone Recognition, or am I totally ignorant and way-off-base? Thanks! Baron Chandler chandbl@wkuvx1.bitnet ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 17:04:09 EDT From: mking@fsd.com (Mike King) Subject: Re: 800 Alternatives and Billing In TELECOM Digest, V13 #548, Pat noted: > [Moderator's Note: Back in the days when AT&T controlled all 800 > numbers (well, let's say in the 1970's - 1980's) 800 numbers did not > work like they do now. Now, your carrier gets the number dialed, > translates it to a regular number and dials it back out. In other > times, your 800 number was a number unto itself with a physical wire > pair which came to you and an instrument upon which you spoke. It was > a separate and distinct thing. Now you get 800 on your regular line; > then you had to have a separate instrument and wires. On the phone > sitting there (which usually had a flat plastic piece across where the > dial would go -- like an old manual service line -- since you could > not dial out on it anyway; picking it up you'd hear battery but no > dialtone) a little number sticker actually referred to it as 800-xxx-xxxx. Ah, yes, I had well forgotten how much things had changed. Now I remember that Ohio Bell required that an 800 number had to be terminated with TWO lines, minimum. Of course, we assumed that if the published 800 number was 800-xxx-1234, the second line was 800-xxx-1235. But things didn't work that way. ;-) I remember the lack of dialtone when going offhook. I also remember that 800 prefixes were allocated according to territory and whether the 800 number was in-state or out-of-state. 800-762 was in-state Ohio, terminating in the 513 area, while 800-543 was out-of-state terminating in Cincinnati. > Where before AT&T handled the In-WATS call to the telco and said 'here > is a call, who is it locally? Translate it and deal with it ...' now > the carriers do the translations and simply hand telco a call to be > completed to an already defined (by the LD carrier) number before the > local telco even sees it. Am I correct for once, someone? PAT] Yes, you're correct. I humbly apologize for doubting you. Mike King * Software Sourcerer * Fairchild Space * +1 301.428.5384 mking@fsd.com or 73710.1430@compuserve.com * (usual disclaimers) [Moderator's Note: And 800-621 was Band 6 Interstate terminating in Illinois. Now and then I still see someone in Chicago with an 800-621 number and I realize they've probably had it for ten years or more. When divestiture occurred, AT&T kept the lion's share of the 800-xxx prefixes since they had all those 'banded' interstate and intrastate billing plans in place in each state, each plan requiring its own one or more of the 800-xxx numbers. The unassigned 'xxx' at that point were the ones handed out to MCI, Sprint and other carriers. PAT] ------------------------------ From: co057@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steven H. Lichter) Subject: Re: Central Office Tours? Date: 12 Aug 1993 11:09:39 GMT Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA) Yes the step equipment was a lot more interesting. We had mockups of switch trains that would let the tours see how the calls went through, and there were also contests for free long distance calls. I know it was fun to work those tours. We got paid for it and had a lot of fun. But then in those days the job was fun; today all I can think of many days it getting out of there or vacation. Had I been offered a package I'm sure I would have taken it. I do my job the way I was trained, but the stress level at times is really something. Steven H. Lichter GTECalif COEI ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #567 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa06673; 12 Aug 93 22:46 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA23748 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 20:29:48 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA10678 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 20:29:09 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 20:29:09 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308130129.AA10678@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@delta.eecs.nwu.edu Subject: Toronto Free-NET FAQ I got this a couple days ago, and although it is a bit long, I thought it important enough to share with readers here. I like the concept of Free-Net, which is something we really need here in Chicago; I guess it is one more thing I'll have to spend money on when I win the Illinois State Lottery or get lucky -- *real* lucky -- with those little pull tabs McDonald's puts on the French Fry containers giving prizes away. :) PAT] Date: Tue, 10 Aug 93 21:06:35 EDT From: Rick Broadhead Subject: Toronto Free-Net FAQ To: Telecom Digest Pat, This document is obviously too long for inclusion in the Digest, but I'd appreciate if you could consider sending it out as a separate issue (or item). Free-Nets are on the leading edge of telecommunications, and this document has had a very favourable reception on the Net. We want to get the whole world excited about this! Just take a look at the list of cities with Free-Net organizing committees! 45 cities around the world and growing every month! The FAQ has already been distributed on the net-happenings mailing list, but TELECOM Digest would be a more appropriate spot. Regards, Rick --------------------- Q. What city is missing from this list? Dillon, Montana Buffalo, New York Cleveland, Ohio Denver, Colorado Peoria, Illinois Elyria, Ohio Medina, Ohio Ottawa, Ontario Tallahassee, Florida Cincinnati, Ohio Victoria, British Columbia Columbia, Missouri Youngstown, Ohio Wellington, New Zealand A. Toronto ********************************************************************* * * * * * COMING MARCH 31, 1994.....THE TORONTO FREE-NET * * * * * ********************************************************************* News/Weather local, provincial, national, and international news headlines, weather forecasts.... Transportation road and highway conditions, TTC route and fare information, VIA schedules and ticket prices, GO Transit route and fare information, airline schedules.... Travel and Tourism convention and visitor information, travel and tourist information, hotel/motel directories, sightseeing information, information on tourist attractions in Toronto, information from foreign embassies and consulates, travel advisories... Education directory of school trustees, public and separate school directories, college and university program information, alternative education information, information on continuing education programs.... Employment job listings, union activities, employment standards information, job training information.... Legal legal aid services, general legal information Library Information We expect that the Toronto Free-Net will provide on-line access to public library catalogues across Metropolitan Toronto. Our goal is to make it possible for Free-Net users to search the library holdings of all six municipal library systems in Metro from the Toronto Free-Net. Library representatives from East York, Etobicoke, North York, Scarborough, Toronto, and York are working closely with the Toronto Free-Net Committee. The Metropolitan Toronto Reference Library is also involved in the discussions. We also hope to link the Toronto Free-Net to university library catalogues around the world. The Toronto Media Ottawa's daily newspaper, the Ottawa Citizen, uses the National Capital FreeNet to post guides to community events, the Arts, sports, dining, and entertainment. The Ottawa Citizen also has a mailbox on the National Capital FreeNet so that users can electronically submit a letter to the Editor. We hope that the Toronto media will participate on the Toronto Free-Net in a similar fashion. The media could use the Free-Net to receive suggestions and comments, letters to columnists/broadcasters, and other items for publication/broadcast. In addition, radio and television stations could place their broadcast schedules on the Toronto Free-Net. Here's just one example of how the media can use Free-Nets to disseminate information to the community. Shortly after Prime Minister Kim Campbell announced her new cabinet, the Ottawa Citizen posted the list of new ministers on the National Capital FreeNet. Callers to the FreeNet were able to review the ministerial line-up on-line and download (transfer) the list to their personal computers. Who Will Pay For the Operation of the Toronto Free-Net? Free-Nets depend on the generosity of the community. It is expected that the operating costs of the Toronto Free-Net will be covered by grants and donations from the government, businesses in the community, and from the users themselves. By far, our greatest expense will be the phone bill. To help us offset this cost, businesses and organizations will have the opportunity to sponsor phone lines. Callers who receive a sponsored line will see the name of the sponsor on the screen. How Do I Become a Member of the Toronto Free-Net? In order to have full use of the facilities on the Toronto Free-Net, users will be required to complete and mail a registration form. There is no fee to register, except for the cost of a postage stamp. The registration form will be available on the Free-Net itself, as well as at public libraries throughout Metro Toronto. Anyone will be able to access the Toronto Free-Net as a guest, and look around, but only registered users will be given an account, and allowed to use all of the services on the Free-Net. When you register with us, you become a member of the Toronto Free-Net. You'll be assigned a personal account name and a password. An account is necessary in order to send and receive electronic mail. Is There a Time Limit on my Free-Net Session? Yes. To give everyone an opportunity to use the system, all users will be subject to a limit of one hour on their Free-Net session. However, there is no limit on the number of sessions that a Free-Net user can have on any given day. How Will I Access the Toronto Free-Net? Anyone with a computer, a modem, and a telephone line will be able to access the Toronto Free-Net by dialing a central telephone number in Toronto. The Toronto Free-Net will be menu-driven. Once you connect to the Free-Net, you'll be able to move around the system by selecting options from menus on the screen. Is Computer Literacy a Prerequisite to Use the Toronto Free-Net? No. Our committees are working hard to develop a system that is easy to use, regardless of the user's level of computer experience. The Toronto Free-Net is a community computer system, and the community must be able to use it. When resources permit, we intend to develop manuals and run training sessions to ensure that our users are able to make optimal use of the system. Ease of use is one of our most important priorities. Where Will the Toronto Free-Net be Located? The Toronto Free-Net's administrative offices and its physical facilities (i.e. the Free-Net computers) will be located in Metropolitan Toronto; precise locations have not yet been determined. Will the Toronto Free-Net Require Any Paid Personnel? Yes. While the Toronto Free-Net will be largely run by volunteers, the size and scope of the system will make it necessary for us to hire some staff. A typical Free-Net will have a full-time Project Manager or Executive Director, a system manager, a system administrator, and clerical and technical support staff. What If I Don't Have a Computer? Public access terminals will be established at libraries throughout Metropolitan Toronto for those people who don't have the capability of calling the Toronto Free-Net from their home or office. We expect that community centers, schools, and hotels will want to provide public access terminals as well. Public access terminals can be established virtually anywhere in the city. Are Free-Nets Interconnected? Yes. The Toronto Free-Net will be connected to other Free-Nets around the world. This means that users of the Toronto Free-Net will be able to access the information on other community computer systems across the United States and around the world. The Toronto Free-Net will be part of a growing network of community computer systems. Here's How It Works: On the Toronto Free-Net, there will be a list of all the participating Free-Nets in the world. To go to another Free-Net, you select that Free-Net from the menu, and the connection is made automatically. When the connection is in place, you will be physically connected to the other Free-Net computer, just as if you were living in the host city, and dialling the Free-Net locally. As more and more Free-Nets come on-line, the list of cities that you can electronically "travel" to will grow. It's conceivable that every major metropolitan city will eventually have a community computer system of its own. From the Toronto Free-Net, you'll be able to access organizations, individuals, and local information, just about anywhere in the world. Just think of the possibilities! In order to have full use of the services on another Free-Net, you'll have to register with them first, just as you have to register with us to have unrestricted access to our facility. But most Free-Nets will accept registrations from outside their local calling area, so you don't have to be a local resident to use the system. Bear in mind that registration isn't necessary if all you want to do is read the information on another Free-Net. Most Free-Nets will permit people to use their system as a "guest". A guest is a term for an unregistered user, or a non-member. Guests are free to look around the system and view the databases, but they can't send or receive electronic mail. Naturally, the Toronto Free-Net will be accepting connections from users on other Free-Nets, just as other Free-Nets will accept connections from our users. We will also be accepting registrations from anywhere in the world. You don't have to be a Toronto resident to use the system, or become a member of the Toronto Free-Net, but the information on the Free-Net will be local and community-based. Many of the people that connect to the Toronto Free-Net from around the world will be using our system as a guest. But we also expect to have many international users register with us, and become members. You will be able to connect to the Toronto Free-Net via the Internet, or by dialing a Toronto telephone number (area code 416). How Will the Toronto Free-Net Impact Tourism? While the Toronto Free-Net's primary focus is to serve the local community, it will have an international audience. The information on the Toronto Free-Net will be available to thousands of people around the globe, since it will be possible for anyone on the global Internet to tap into the Toronto Free-Net and browse our databases. The Toronto Free-Net is already attracting international attention, and once we open our doors to the public, people from all over the world will be able to use the Toronto Free-Net to discover what Toronto has to offer the visitor. Without question, our tourism industry will benefit from the exposure that the city will receive as a result of the Toronto Free-Net's presence on the Internet. We expect that Free-Net terminals will be placed in hotel lobbies across Toronto so that tourists and other visitors can use the system to get information about the city. Tourists could use the Toronto Free-Net to: * find a taxicab * get public transit information * get a list of tourist attractions, their operating hours and entrance fees * obtain a list of restaurants in the city * get the addresses of consulates and embassies in Toronto * get general facts about Toronto (population, history, etc.) Are Free-Nets Independent? Each Free-Net is run autonomously, but all Free-Nets are affiliates of the National Public Telecomputing Network (NPTN), based in Cleveland, Ohio. The NPTN distributes the software needed to run a Free-Net, provides support to existing Free-Nets, and promotes the development of community computer systems. The NPTN also organizes an annual meeting, which brings together representatives from all its affiliates. The term "Free-Net" is a registered servicemark of the NPTN, so only affiliates of the NPTN are allowed to call themselves a Free-Net. Who Will Benefit From a Toronto Free-Net? Residents Residents are given free access to a wealth of community-related information. By removing economic and social barriers to information, the Toronto Free-Net will make information more accessible to the public. Because the Toronto Free-Net will be connected to the Internet, Toronto Free-Net users will be able to correspond electronically with municipal, provincial, and federal government offices that use the Internet. The Toronto Free-Net will make it easier for officials at all levels of government to communicate with their constituents. It is projected that by the end of 1995, all Federal Government officials will have e-mail. And by the end of this year, all Ontario Government electronic mail accounts are expected to be conencted to the Internet. The Community Because the Toronto Free-Net is a volunteer effort, it provides new and exciting opportunities for individuals to become more involved in their community - by providing information to the Free-Net, starting a Special Interest Group, serving on a Free-Net committee, or simply by interacting with other Toronto Free-Net users. Clubs and community groups will benefit from the Toronto Free-Net's electronic messaging facilities, which will expedite communications and make it easier for groups to share information, coordinate their activities, and liaise with the public. The Toronto Free-Net has tremendous potential to draw the community closer together. Community/Professional Associations and Government Clubs and community groups will enhance their public relations by participating on the Toronto Free-Net as an information provider. Community organizations that establish an electronic mailbox on the Free-Net will increase their accessibility and visibility to the general public. At any time of the day or night, Free-Net users can leave messages for participating organizations and access information on government and community services. The Toronto Free-Net will provide an innovative and powerful way for community organizations to communicate with the public. The government will find that the Toronto Free-Net provides a fast, effective, and efficient way to distribute important information to the community. Seniors and People With Disabilities Senior citizens and people with disabilities will be able to access and exchange information easily and at no charge, without leaving their home. Teachers and Educators The Free-Net will provide a cost-effective means for public and secondary schools to teach telecomputing to their students. Teachers and students will be able to communicate with their counterparts around the world, using the Free-Net's electronic mail system. Many public and secondary schools in the U.S. and Canada already have some connection to the Internet. Another Benefit: Increased Computer Literacy Computer literacy will increase in the community as people learn how to use the Toronto Free-Net to gain quick and easy access to information resources electronically. Because the Toronto Free-Net will give its members access to modern telecommunications facilities, users will develop an understanding and an appreciation of the role and importance of electronic communications and information technology. How Will the Toronto Free-Net Affect Employment? The Toronto Free-Net has the potential to create new employment opportunities in community and government organizations that actively participate on the system. Once organizations realize the benefits of being involved with the Free-Net, they may assign personnel to serve as the organization's liaison with the Free-Net. These people would update the organization's information on the Free-Net and manage the organization's Free-Net mailbox. They would also be responsible for finding new ways for the organization to use the Toronto Free-Net to improve its relations with the public. How Will the Free-Net be Different from Bulletin Board Systems and Commercial Services? * The Toronto Free-Net will be free to the user, unlike commercial systems which charge for their services. * The Toronto Free-Net will not be suitable for heavy commercial traffic * The Toronto Free-Net has a mandate that is community-oriented, unlike many large commercial systems and small bulletin board systems, which have a much narrower focus, and appeal to users with specific interests. The Toronto Free-Net will have dozens of community databases. We'll have something for everyone! * Many bulletin board systems are chat or message-oriented, and are designed for the computer hobbyist. The Toronto Free-Net will be information-oriented, and it will be designed with the community user in mind. No computer experience required! * The Toronto Free-Net will not have software archives or offer computer programs. The one exception may be off-line mail readers. * The Toronto Free-Net will be funded by government and business donations * The Toronto Free-Net will be very easy to navigate and use It is not our intention to compete with commercial and smaller, private systems. The Toronto Free-Net will actually expand the market for commercial services and bulletin board systems by increasing computer literacy in the community. We want to work with operators of bulletin board systems and the larger commercial systems to promote their use and make the general public aware of their existence. When Will the Toronto Free-Net Be Operational? The official launch date is March 31, 1994, but our rate of progress depends on the amount of support we receive from the community. Who Can Participate? Everyone in Metro Toronto is invited to participate. This is a community effort, and there is an opportunity for everyone in the city to get involved. Does the Toronto Free-Net Committee Need My Help? Yes! We are actively seeking volunteers to help with public relations, fund-raising, hardware and software issues, organizational matters, and information collection. We need clubs, community and professional associations, and the government to contribute information to the Free-Net. How can your organization participate? We are looking for institutions that are interested in being a public access site for the Toronto Free-Net. We need financial support to cover the costs of phone lines and hardware/software. How Can I or My Business or Association Get Involved? Please contact anyone on the Board of Directors or one of the Committee Chairs to find how you or your organization can contribute to the development of the Toronto Free-Net. We need volunteers from the commmunity, as well as the involvement of businesses and community associations to help the Toronto Free-Net achieve its true potential. For further information on the Toronto Free-Net, contact: Rick Broadhead ysar1111@VM1.YorkU.CA (Internet) Faculty of Administrative Studies ysar1111@yorkvm1 (Bitnet) York University ...!bitnet!yorkvm1!ysar1111 (UUCP) Toronto, CANADA --------------------- [TELECOM Moderator's Note: Isn't that a mouth-watering proposition? But you know who else is missing from the list of cities? Chicago. And we are going to desparately need the 'school house' programs offered by Free-Net since it is pretty well established that our public school system here will not be operational for some period of time during the school year starting later this month. I have corresponded with the Free-Net people in Ohio to see what, if anything can be done here, but where the money will come from I have no idea at this point, and of course a year or better is needed to even operate the humblest of sites. My first thought on seeing this message earlier this week was to get set up with on line terminals in every public library and school in Chicago. "Dream on, Moderator," was the answer one person sent me in email. Sigh ... sad, and true. And what about your city? Is it on that list above? If not, why not? If you think a Free-Net is needed in your town as much as I think one is needed here, then do this: First -- use anonymous ftp to nptn.org. Pull the several files in the /pub/info.nptn directory. Read them closely, then for more information write to: info@nptn.org My thanks to Rick Broadhead for passing along the FAQ on Toronto. Best wishes in getting the site actually up and running! Patrick Townson   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa08054; 12 Aug 93 23:49 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA20978 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 21:37:39 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA12201 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Thu, 12 Aug 1993 21:37:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 21:37:00 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308130237.AA12201@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #568 TELECOM Digest Thu, 12 Aug 93 21:37:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 568 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Call Tracker Device (Hindra Irawan) Re: When Will General Computing Conquer Telecom Switching? (Randy Gellens) Re: Radar Detectors (Dave Carpentier) Re: Radar Detectors (Cliff Sharp) Re: Radar Detectors (David Breneman) Re: Radar Detectors (Paul Robinson) Re: Radar and Acronyms (Dave Levenson) Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address (Justin Greene) Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address (wizzy!andyr@hp-col.col.hp.com) Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address (Jack Decker) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: irawan@netcom.com (Hindra Irawan) Subject: Re: Call Tracker Device Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 19:10:37 GMT Hindra Irawan (irawan@netcom.com) wrote: > Does anybody know of a device that would do the following: > - record the number called (tone and/or pulse dialing); > - record the time and day of the call made; > - record the duration of the call; > - dump the data collected to a PC or Mac; > - capable of handling multiple lines. > The reason I asked this is because in the country where I am going > (Indonesia) there are no such thing as itemized phone bill. I need to > use this as an analysis tool. Hopefully so that I can work on my own > as telecom consultant. > If you have information on where to get such device and how much, > please send it to my email address (irawan@netcom.com). Apparently my inquiry generated quite an interest among other netters, so here is the summary of all the email I have received until today. Some responses are edited for the sake of conciseness. Thank you very much for all of you that have responded. Cheers, Hindra At 2:06 PM 8/9/93 -0700, Jim Gottlieb wrote: If you're going to have more than one line anyway, pick up a Panasonic KX-T308 PBX. It will do this for you and a lot more. They are sold in Indonesia. Best to find a wholesale distributor. I had one name in Surubaya but not with me now. You could buy one in the U.S. and take it with you, but it would be a 110V version. Best to buy it over there. Jim Gottlieb E-Mail: jimmy@denwa.info.com In Japan: jimmy@info.juice.or.jp V-Mail: +1 310 551 7702 Fax: 478-3060 Voice: 824-5454 At 2:28 PM 8/9/93 -0500, Warne, John wrote: The company Moscom makes a tip and ring scanner that will do most of the things you want. The disadvantage is it comes in 48 line increments and costs around $4,000.00. It's a Model 548. MOSCOM Corporation, 300 Main Street, East Rochester, NY 14445, 716-385-6440. I'd appreciate a summary of any other units you hear about. I'm looking for something in a smaller, less expensive package. John Warne Voice: 904-336-3522 FAX: 904-336-3744 Telecommunications Manager I-NET: 19064001@sbacvm.sbac.edu School Board of Alachua County CIS: 76424,2220 Fred C. Sivia, Jr. Support Center 3700-B NE 53rd Avenue Gainesville, Florida 32609 At 2:38 PM 8/9/93 -0700, Herb Jellinek wrote: Hindra yth, Mencobalah "Hello Direct"; nomornya 1-800-HI-HELLO (1-800-444-3556). Mereka tersediah banyak devisi seperti itu. [translation] Try "Hello Direct", their number is 1-800-HI-HELLO (1-800-444-3556). They have a lot of that kind of a device. At 5:18 PM 8/9/93 -0700, Steve Cogorno wrote: I think you need a CAT or a Call Accounting Device. AT&T sells them with their popular Merlin, System 75 and SPIRIT systems. If this is for home use, you might want to get a Merlin Plus - not too expensive, but is very full featured. Also, just about every phone system should have some typew of CAT that it supports. AT&T's CAT also is programmed with your local tariffs (I don't know if this would work in Singapore :-). So you can also get per-call costs on each call (to bill departments and the like.) You can also specify a percent to mark-up calls to account for system maintenence. Steve cogorno@netcom.com At 4:42 AM 8/9/93 -0400, Jack Decker wrote: Among other devices you may hear about, I know that the Mitel Smart-1 dialer can do all of the above, more or less. I say more or less because it will unquestionably do the first three. It will do number four (dump the data) in REAL TIME to a printer or other device connected to its serial port. In other words, it doesn't have any onboard memory to hold call detail - if the printer or computer isn't hooked up to the Smart-1's RS-232 serial port at the time that a call is placed, the detail for that call won't be recorded. And you can buy Mitel Smart-1 dialers in one, two, or four port (line) models... to handle more lines, you add more dialers, which can be chained together. However, I suspect that an "obsolete" XT class computer (which could be dedicated to the task of recording call detail) connected to a Smart-1 might cost less than a unit designed specifically for call detail recording. I'm not sure but I think you can pick up Smart-1's on the used market for $200 to $400 dollars (that's a guess, but I suspect I'm pretty close... a single line unit might be even less). If you get Telecom Gear magazine, look for ads from Square One Electronics (U.S. 800-666-4300, International Sales 314-651-3162) or King Technologies (800-489-7372). Both sell refurbished Smart-1's. The following paragraphs were lifted from an article about dialers in general (referred to as "call controllers" here), and will give you a little better idea of what else these units are capable of: In addition to Call Detail recording, call controllers allow you to deny (block) calls to certain phone numbers, telephone exchanges, or area codes. They allow you to route calls via particular long distance carriers, possibly selecting the least expensive carrier for any given call, and automatically (and transparently) adding any necesary digits to complete the call (for example, you might dial 1 plus a number; the call controller might translate that to dial into a carrier's switch, then dial an account code and the desired number. While this method of long distance access isn't used much anymore, it's clearly within the call controller's capabilities). And, some call controllers allow you to assign an identification code to each employee, and may even allow the assignment of project codes. This, someone dialing a toll call would have to enter their ID code, which would identify who placed the call (or restrict the call if an invalid code is dialed), and then perhaps a project code that would specify at the time of the call to which account the call is to be rebilled! Those in certain professions (e.g. attorneys and accountants) find the ability to tag each call with a project code to be invaluable. Most call controllers have speed dial capability, allowing you to store frequently called numbers in memory, and dial them using just two or three buttons on your phones. While many phones have speed dial capabilities these days, the advantage of putting speed dial numbers in a call controller is that the speed dial feature can then the used from every phone in the building, even older "dumb" phones with no memory. Many call controllers can even do esoteric functions like allowing you to use touch tone phones on a rotary dial line (nice if you're on an older exchange, or don't want to pay the phone company an extra monthly charge for touch-tone service). One final capabability that deserves special mention is the ability to insert special dialing prefixes for calls to selected numbers, or all numbers. For example, you could automatically dial the code to cancel call waiting whenever a toll call, or an international call is placed. If you don't want your phone number showing up on the displays of telephone customers who have Caller-ID service, you could prepend the *67 blocking code to all outgoing calls. You could also do number translation on certain calls (for example, if your community doesn't have 911 service yet, you can set it up so that when someone dials 911, the local police number is called instead). [End of material from article.] In your situation, I think that the Smart-1 has a couple capabilities that might be of interest to you. One is "cloning"... you set up one unit with a "default" configuration, then as you program units for new clients, you can "clone" the program from your master unit into your client units. Or, alternately, you can program the units using a computer connected via the serial port. Also, the Smart-1 accepts either touch tones or dial pulses and output whatever the line will accept. If your client wants to use touch tone phones on a rotary exchange, no problem. Or, if your client has some rotary phones but you want to send touch tones to the phone company or a LD carrier (e.g. via a "country direct" number), you can do that. For example, if you have a client that calls the U.S.A. often, you could program the dialer to look for calls to the international dialing prefix and country code "1", and the dialer might then dial the U.S.A. direct number, listen for "boing" tone, dial the U.S.A. part of the number, dial an account code, and then cut through. It would be transparent to callers; they would never know anything unusual had happened. Well, that's about all I can tell you, and I just got a call that I have to attend to, so I have to go. Hope this helps. Jack Decker | ao944@yfn.ysu.edu or ac388@freenet.hsc.colorado.edu At 1:28 AM 8/10/93 -0500, - - wrote: I'm working on such a device now. Let me know if you find anything else. bailey@casbah.acns.nwu.edu ------------------------------ From: RANDY@MPA15AB.mv-oc.Unisys.COM Date: 12 AUG 93 01:31 Subject: Re: When Will General Computing Conquer Telecom Switching? > So my answer to when General Purpose Computing will overcome Telecom > Switching: never. There is simply no way that the general purpose > computing community is ever going to bear the cost of the reliability > that we consider mandatory for switching. I'm not so sure. One of the areas in which my company specializes is mission-critical systems [no, those aren't sarcastic system which make fun of your company's mission :-) ]. For example, an airline reservation system, or a core on-line transaction processing system. If an airline can't get at its reservation system, it loses money big-time. If a company which sells over the phone (such as a TV shopping channel) can't get at its database, it is shut down. Companies are demanding ever-increasing reliability for their mainframe systems. What is acceptable for a single-user PC is not OK for a machine on which your business depends. As for vulnerability to viruses, a system can be open and still be more resistent than most. Open means the ability to run applications with a standard API (such as Posix), it is not a synonym for Unix. Our A Series systems, for example, are already very open and getting more so all the time. The underlying hardware is object-oriented, and uses tags to differentiate types of data. So, it knows the difference between an executable instruction and an operand. It knows about arrays and pointers, and dosn't permit indexing out of bounds or pointing into an invalid area. Coupled with the operating system security, executable files cannot be created or modified except by trusted compilers. The absolute highest level of security is required to mark a compiler as trusted. There is no assembler (no need for one because the high-level languages are fast and powerful, since they match the hardware archetecture). So, any program which tried to infect other programs would fail, unless it has already totally bypassed system security (not an easy feat). The point of all this is that general-purpose computers are becoming much more failure-resistant, and it is possible to have systems which are open and resistant to viruses. I would not rule out using general purpose systems for switches, although the main problem I see is that the operating systems are usually not ideal for real-time applications (although the A Series is a very nice interrupt-driven hardware and software archetecture). Randy Gellens....................|.............randy@mv-oc.unisys.com A Series System Software.........|...........[if mail bounces, please Unisys Corporation...............|..............forward bounce msg to Mission Viejo, CA................|..............rgellens@mcimail.com] Opinions are personal;...facts are suspect;...I speak only for myself ------------------------------ From: dave.carpentier@oln.com Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1993 18:44:31 -0400 Subject: Re: Radar Detectors hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) wrote: > All the legal issues surrounding use of radar detectors is > interesting, but I don't think I'd want to be in the business of > making something whose chief purpose is to help people violate the > law. I've seen ads about how radar detectors promote safe driving. > Somehow I'm not convinced ... I suppose it could be likened to 'flashing' the golden-three to an oncoming car to warn of a radar trap. If caught, you could say that you were just trying to prevent someone from breaking the law. Of course, the police could say that you were creating a hazard by flashing your lights. Dave ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Radar Detectors Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 5:19:19 CDT From: Cliff Sharp In article , hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) writes: > All the legal issues surrounding use of radar detectors is > interesting, but I don't think I'd want to be in the business of > making something whose chief purpose is to help people violate the > law. I've seen ads about how radar detectors promote safe driving. > Somehow I'm not convinced ... Darnit, I can't find the stuff, but part of the package I received from Escort (formerly, and apparently still, Cincinnati Microwave) contained an article from a major newspaper citing a traffic study showing that people who used radar detectors were safer drivers, with fewer accidents and more likely to use seat belts. I believe they even said such drivers were less likely to speed (although if they did, this could be colored by the fact that such drivers could be less likely to get caught). I do notice, however, that most drivers who _really_ speed (i.e., 20+ MPH over the limit) do not have a radar detector visible. And as I mentioned in a previous posting, I have mine for totally different reasons than speeding. I'd like to hear from anyone who's been driving for more than a month who hasn't found himself unintentionally over the limit at some time or another, and who wouldn't want a "second chance" to correct this before getting ticketed for it. I strongly suggest to anyone with even a marginal interest in this subject that they call Escort at 1-800-543-1608 and request their free packet on radar. Cliff Sharp clifto@indep1.chi.il.us OR clifto@indep1.uucp WA9PDM Use whichever one works ------------------------------ From: daveb%jaws@dsinet.dgtl.com (David Breneman) Subject: Re: Radar Detectors Date: 12 Aug 93 19:59:32 GMT Organization: Digital Systems International, Redmond WA Harold Hallikainen (hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu) wrote: > All the legal issues surrounding use of radar detectors is > interesting, but I don't think I'd want to be in the business of > making something whose chief purpose is to help people violate the > law. I've seen ads about how radar detectors promote safe driving. > Somehow I'm not convinced ... Oh! And here I thought you were talking about radar *guns*. Let's see -- warrantless search without probable cause ... yeah, that's breaking the law alright. Manufacturers say they promote safety ... Yup. There is nothing noble in blind obedience to unjust laws. David Breneman Email: daveb@jaws.engineering.dgtl.com System Administrator, Software Engineering Services Digital Systems International, Inc. Voice: 206 881-7544 Fax: 206 556-8033 (Typical disclaimers vis a vis my employer, since somebody is *bound* to find that last sentence controversial; and more's the pity.) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 12:19:58 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM Subject: Re: Radar Detectors From: Paul Robinson Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA Harold Hallikainen , writes: > All the legal issues surrounding use of radar detectors is > interesting, but I don't think I'd want to be in the business of > making something whose chief purpose is to help people violate the > law. I've seen ads about how radar detectors promote safe driving. > Somehow I'm not convinced ... This ignores the question about whether the law is right or not. The alleged purpose of the 55 MPH speed limit was to save gasoline during a supposed oil shortage (which was caused by government allocation rules). When this oil shortage ended, the low limit stayed for a long time therafter and is still in effect in some areas including my alleged "Freestate" of Maryland. No one ever asked the public whether they wanted this law; it was imposed upon us (and usually over general public opposition.) If there was a vote I wonder what the result would be, since most people who drive vote against the law by the speed they use. As with the ban on cellular receivers, it was imposed on the public without regard as to whether it was right or moral to do so or whether it was even necessary or even if it would work. It is one thing to have a law to punish those who commit crimes against others; this is the legitimate purpose of a government. Punishing toll fraud is a valid activity. Laws prohibiting giving out the contents of private communications over radio are probably reasonable but that's borderline. Going beyond that which is the legitimate purpose of government and using police power to define what non-injurious conduct is acceptable gets into excess government interference in the lives and property of the citizens and is usually arbitrary and often capricious. Also, when government gets involved in these things, it is always to the detriment of its legitimate responsibilities. Time spent tracking down people who owned illegal receivers, if enforced, would take away from resources which could be used to detect telephone fraud. I can give other examples where the government gets involved in things it has no business getting into and thus causing the legitimate functions of government such as police protection to suffer, but they are not germane to the subject of telecommunications. Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ------------------------------ From: dave@westmark.com (Dave Levenson) Subject: Re: Radar and Acronyms Organization: Westmark, Inc. Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 21:38:53 GMT In article , Cliff Sharp writes: > LORAN - LOng RAnge Navigation > ELF - Extremely Low Frequency (which is among the hierarchy: and lots more, to which I would like to add: NTSC - National Television Standards Committee " - Never Twice the Same Color Dave Levenson Internet: dave@westmark.com Westmark, Inc. UUCP: {uunet | rutgers | att}!westmark!dave Stirling, NJ, USA Voice: 908 647 0900 Fax: 908 647 6857 ------------------------------ From: jgreene@nyx.cs.du.edu (Justin Greene) Subject: Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept. Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 19:55:56 GMT > Yet another reason to buy this service from a company like Mail Boxes > Etc. (And you get the added benefit that alternative carriers like > UPS and FedEx can deliver to these "boxes".) [Deleted stuff] > [Moderator's Note: Years ago, Postal Form 1537 (authorization to > deliver mail to an agent, complete with true name and address of the > final recipient of the mail) was mandatory, and postal inspectors > would quite often review the forms. The mail drop was not supposed to [Deleted] > of the carpet baggers and deadbeats. Now the form is voluntary. PAT] I think it is still required. The mailhouse is supposed to turn these in to the PO so that they have it in their files. I have looked up private mail house boxes at the main post office. The trouble is that most private houses do not file the forms so the post office doesn't have them and nobody cares (did I say problem ;-) ). Justin Greene Finger for PGP 2.x public key [Moderator's Note: According to the Mailing Requirements Division at the Chicago Main Post Office, the form is now voluntary. PAT] ------------------------------ From: wizzy!andyr@hp-col.col.hp.com Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 17:18 MDT Reply-To: andyr@wizzy.com Organization: W.Z.I. Subject: Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address In article , TELECOM Moderator noted: > [Moderator's Note: Years ago, Postal Form 1537 (authorization to > deliver mail to an agent, ..... Now the form is voluntary. PAT] I have a mailbox, (and no, I neither bag carpets, beat deads nor have any penniless ex-wives) and was recently required to fill out one of these forms. They also asked for *two* forms of identification (a credit card being acceptable as one!). The owner was most apologetic, but said that the PO required it. I only gave one -- my green card from the INS. I figure nobody has a database indexed by that ... Cheers, Andy [Moderator's Note: Individual agents can operate their maildrops by whatever legitimate rules they choose. Some have gotten so tired of seeing the postal inspectors they just make the form mandatory for their own records and then when the customer complains, blame it on the post office for requiring it. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 23:43:17 EDT From: ao944@yfn.ysu.edu (Jack Decker) Subject: Re: Phone Number -> Name/Address In message , wollman@trantor.emba.uvm.edu (Garrett Wollman) wrote: > In article , TELECOM Moderator noted in > response to Elana Beach : >> PO Box info *is* public, you know, if you know who to ask and the >> phrases to use when you invoke Freedom of Information. > Yet another reason to buy this service from a company like Mail Boxes > Etc. (And you get the added benefit that alternative carriers like > UPS and FedEx can deliver to these "boxes".) [remainder of Mr. Wollman's message deleted] And then Pat made this comment in response: > Most mail drops are nothing more than fraud-hives with a few > legitimate customers among the ranks of the carpet baggers and > deadbeats. Pat, I think you really need to get out of Chicago for a while; you're becoming overly suspicious of everyone's motives. The fact is that out here in the hinterlands, many smaller post offices simply don't have enough P.O. Boxes to meet the demand, so if you want a box without waiting for weeks or months, you go to one of the independents. (Some- how, I have to speculate that the downtown Chicago P.O., built in an era when folks weren't as afraid to go downtown, has more than enough boxes to go around). Other reasons to use such a service: Better location, or cheaper price for the size box you want to rent, or perhaps just less government red tape. Also, the fact that U.P.S. and similar carriers can deliver to these drops is no small thing, and some of these places will even receive incoming FAXes or telephone messages for you and place them in your box. And there's one other possible advantage -- you receive less junk mail (since you don't get the mail addressed to "boxholder" that you'd get in an official P.O.Box). What I don't understand is why you'd be more suspicious of someone renting a private P.O. Box as opposed to someone renting a regular P.O. Box? A lot of scams have been pulled off using "official" P.O. boxes, and in the event that there is serious mail fraud, I'm sure the private P.O. box outfit could be compelled to disclose whatever info they may have about the box renter. I doubt it is any less mail fraud just because a private mail drop is used. Perhaps you're just a bit steamed because those in the private investigation business can't easily get information about private mail drop users? Jack Decker | ao944@yfn.ysu.edu or ac388@freenet.hsc.colorado.edu [Moderator's Note: This issue is getting full, so I will respond in some detail in the next issue. I'll tell you in some detail about the post office known as Loop Station Lockbox, 60690. There is too much for a note here. PAT] ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #568 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa12693; 13 Aug 93 3:15 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA09370 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Fri, 13 Aug 1993 00:49:47 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA14328 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Fri, 13 Aug 1993 00:49:08 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1993 00:49:08 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308130549.AA14328@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #569 TELECOM Digest Fri, 13 Aug 93 00:49:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 569 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Chicago Post Office, Mail Drops, etc. (TELECOM Moderator) Interesting 800 Number Response (Chris Ambler) NPA Saturation (Yue-shun E. Ho) Promotional Calling Cards? (Peter Kaminski) ATT Sued by Centigram Over TrueVoice Name (Les Reeves) ANAC Codes by NPA (Les Reeves) Looking For DISCRETE MODEM Technology (S/W Modem Will Do) (Ajay Sanghi) I-405 Construction Hotline (Cellular Dial #405) (Ben Delisle) EasyReach Service Changes (John J. Butz) Prototype Unified Areacode Database Now Available by FTP (Graham Toal) Telecom Feature Interactions (John Adams) What Are the Cable Differences? (Yee-Lee Shyong) Cannot Share T1? (Ed Ellesson) More Three-Character 'From' Locations (Orange Card) (Carl Moore) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 23:26:03 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Subject: Chicago Post Office, Mail Drops, etc. Jack Decker commented on my remarks about maildrops: > Pat, I think you really need to get out of Chicago for a while; you're > becoming overly suspicious of everyone's motives. You don't have to live in Chicago to feel that way, but indeed, I'd love to leave Chicago anytime, for good. The city is a dirty, rotten, nasty, terrible place to live or visit. What other city can boast of 96 people violently murdered in the month of July alone, 18 of whom were children under twelve years of age in gang related violence? You may have heard or read in your newspaper that our public schools here will not be in operation some or most of the school year which begins later this month. But I digress; let's go on ... > The fact is that out here in the hinterlands, many smaller post > offices simply don't have enough P.O. Boxes to meet the demand, so if > you want a box without waiting for weeks or months, you go to one of > the independents. You have to wait 'weeks or months' here also for a PO Box depending on the post office you go to. The two majors downtown (60680 and 60690) are always full with a waiting list. And remember, you have to wait at least a few days while the application you fill out is given to the street carrier for your route. The carrier is supposed to verify that your name is on a mailbox at the street address you put on your form. > (somehow, I have to speculate that the downtown Chicago P.O., built > in an era when folks weren't as afraid to go downtown, has more than > enough boxes to go around). Not really. The post office in the central part of downtown opened in 1974. I had my box at the old courthouse and post office on the same location beginning in 1967; when they tore it down to build the new post office (and a seperate federal building across the street) we boxholders got shuffled off to a makeshift storefront place a block down the street for the two years the construction went on. Once the new place opened -- with about ten thousand boxes -- my box number turned out to be a smaller size box than it had been in the old place. I kept it so I could keep the number (I've had the box number 26 years) and wound up paying less rent since now it was a smaller box. For maybe a year they had lots of boxes available. But now, with the big problem in many major cities of theft from mailboxes (in apartment entrances, etc) many tenants in bad neighborhoods -- like mine for example -- prefer to have some security for the mail so they use boxes at whatever nearby post office has them. You are correct that the downtown area in Chicago is totally deserted after about 6 PM plus all day Saturday and Sunday, but downtown workers get their mail on the way home. Physically located at 210 South Clark Street, 60604, the lock boxes are zip 60690. That post office is open 24 hours per day, seven days per week in the box area, although the retail windows are closed. I go in at 3 AM and get my mail if I happen to be in that area. > Other reasons to use such a service: > Better location, or cheaper price for the size box you want to rent, > or perhaps just less government red tape. I agree you can get boxes faster from the private agents and usually at a size you prefer rather than what the PO has available. > Also, the fact that U.P.S. and similar carriers can deliver to these > drops is no small thing, and some of these places will even receive > incoming FAXes or telephone messages for you and place them in your > box. This is true, and the fact that the parcel services deliver to them is one fact which makes them conducive to fraud. Let's say a company will not usually ship merchandise on open account credit to a post office box, or because they use UPS they can't ship to one. Many con-artists will show their address as ' Suite 139' rather than 'Box 139', leaving the creditor thinking it is a legitimate company in 'Suite 139'. > What I don't understand is why you'd be more suspicious of someone > renting a private P.O. Box as opposed to someone renting a regular P.O. > Box? I never said that. There are legitimate users of both services and lots of illigitimate users of both services. > A lot of scams have been pulled off using "official" P.O. boxes, Certainly. Quite a few years ago, a chap took Diner's Club for about $8000 in unpaid bills. They mailed the credit card to what he claimed was his office address: 434 West Van Buren, #17, Chicago IL 60607. It so happens 434 West Van Buren is the Main Post Office, and window 17 was for General Delivery; the boxes and windows are 60680. > and in the event that there is serious mail fraud, I'm sure the private > P.O. box outfit could be compelled to disclose whatever info they may > have about the box renter. Most of the agents don't have to be 'compelled'. The postal inspector shows up, the agent gives him the records. Its no skin off his nose, and he is not going to jail for his customers. Quite a few drops even say in their service agreement that they cooperate with the Bureau of Inquisition and other federal agencies if it comes to that. > I doubt it is any less mail fraud just because a private mail drop is > used. No, you are correct. Fraud is fraud. If you deposit something in the United States mail (or cause someone else to deposit something in the mail such as a credit card mailed to you by a company) with the intent of committing fraud, it is a federal crime. Some maildrop agents themselves have scams going they blame on their customers, but then post office clerks are not all honest either. 60690 has had some really strange people working there over the years (about 60 full time people work in lockbox during the day, and a dozen or so overnight). The postal inspectors spy on the workers at 60690 to catch them stealing from the mail. It used to be if you got a lot of cash money in the mail in your box at 60690, God help you if the sorting clerks found out about it. Now the sorting clerks in the basement or at the loading docks have to wear coveralls with no pockets. But about ten years ago they hit up the Missionary Fathers (that's a con in itself, the outfit which sends you the free calendar or some cheesey pencil as your 'free gift from the Indian children in the orphange; won't you send us money to help support the orphans, etc; they had many boxes at 60690 for years) for about $50,000 in cash over a year's time. Postal Inspectors 'salted' Missionary Fathers' mail with marked cash and used hidden cameras to watch the employee's restroom as mail sorters, counter clerks and even one supervisor would help themselves to a few M.F. remittance envelopes, disappear into the restroom and come out a few minutes later with a twenty dollar bill in their pocket they did not have when they went in and the rest of the evidence flushed away down the toilet. Some had the nerve to go back for a second or third helping! On another occassion, a credit card fraud ring hit Amoco/Standard Oil for about a hundred grand; all the members of the fraud ring had boxes at 60690 of course -- but four of them worked there as well in the sorting room, all on the midnight shift. The postal inspectors knew it was partly an inside job. Interestingly, the credit applications they filled out had them 'living' at 170 West Harrison in a few cases and 'working' at the same address in others -- it is a mail drop. I went down to get my mail one night and everyone in the place was new except for a couple people. All the other employees got fired in mass the night before. Then after the Missionary Fathers mess, the inspectors cleaned the place out again. Remember the clerk in the post office in Toronto who worked on Oral Roberts for several years and about a half-million dollars before they caught the guy? So to respond to your statement, large urban area industrial size post office box facilities can be and are many times fraud-hives also, and its not just the postal patrons in all cases. :). As we used to say at Amoco/Diners Club credit card office when I worked there twenty years ago, 'cash in the mail attracts undesirable strange hands'. At least after I sued First National Bank in Small Claims Court several years ago I got the pleasure of seeing them fire half their mail room and remittance processing clerks -- 18 people -- in one day who were caught stealing money after a two week investigation. Mail fraud, credit card fraud and financial crimes in general are at higher levels than they have ever been in this country. Too many people on drugs need money. > Perhaps you're just a bit steamed because those in the private > investigation business can't easily get information about private mail > drop users? It doesn't matter to me, Jack. As you pointed out, if the fraud ceases being petty, the heat gets put on the private agents by postal inspectors and others. For further protection, credit card issuers and other credit grantors attempt to verify applications sent to them and a criss-cross directory will list a mail drop for what it is. Generally that throws up a red flag for a credit grantor, at least in a big urban area like Chicago. Say! Did you say I could move out of Chicago and come to live at your house, or least put in a change of address and get my bills all sent out there? :) PAT] ------------------------------ From: cambler@cymbal.calpoly.edu (Chris Ambler) Subject: Interesting 800 Number Response Organization: The Phishtank Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1993 02:54:57 GMT I just called an 800 number for an electronics supplier. After one ring, I got, "Thank you for calling. Our office is now closed. Please call back during normal business hours" ... and then after about 10 seconds (I noticed that it did not disconnect me, so I hung on to see what would happen) I got, "We're sorry, your call could not be completed. 213-xxx" ... the first message, interestingly enough, was the same female voice that seems to do all of the "Thank you for calling Pacific Bell" recordings when you call the phone*company here. Anyone know what this was? A Pacific*Bell service? cambler@zeus.calpoly.edu | Christopher J. Ambler chris@toys.fubarsys.com | Author, FSUUCP 1.32 ------------------------------ From: yho@netcom.com (Yue-shun E. Ho) Subject: NPA Saturation Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 21:08:26 PDT I wonder what is the maximum number of user-dialable NPA that the current rules allow. Does someone here has all the published rules? I believe the rule about the second digit can only be '0' or '1' will soon be broken. Any official estimation (from Bellcore) about when this will happen? Also, is there a rule about the second and third digits cannot be the same? Thanks much in advance. Yue-shun yue-shun e ho +1 416 272 1322 (home) +1 416 452 4934 (work) yho@utcc.utoronto.ca or yho@netcom.com (personal) yho@bnr.ca (business) [Moderator's Note: Early in 1995 is the changeover date. Zero or one have to be the second digit now, and x11 or x00 combinations are not used. 700, 800, and 900 are service codes rather than area codes. You should be able to do the math and figure out the rest. PAT] ------------------------------ From: kaminski@netcom.com (Peter Kaminski) Subject: Promotional Calling Cards? Organization: The Information Deli Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 20:39:30 GMT Social acquaintances of ours have commemorated a special occasion by mailing out a "have a call on us" calling card, with a photo of the occasion on one side, and an 800 number, PIN, and dialing instructions (for North America or international) on the back. Is this the wave of the future? Are the PIN(s) likely to be allocated per promotion/occasion, or per card (looks like it is a series of 150 cards in this case)? Do they still pay per hour for these kinds of things, or is it perhaps some sort of flat rate deal with an upper limit on use? Ever more interesting doth telephony get, Pete ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 18:44:11 -0400 (EDT) From: LESREEVES@delphi.com Subject: ATT Sued by Centigram Over TrueVoice Name * Centigram Communications, based in San Jose, California, said it has filed a lawsuit against AT&T for trademark infringement. Centigram, which manufactures voice processing telephone equipment, said it uses TruVoice to signify the quality of its voice technology. The company said AT&T has been using TrueVoice in its advertisements placed in connection with its long distance services. Centigram said it has sought a temporary restraining order to block AT&T from using the trademark and "AT&T has agreed to stop placing any new advertisements using the mark 'TrueVoice'." AT&T, however, said it has not made such an agreement. A court hearing is set for Friday, in which AT&T expects "to prevail on the merits of the issue." (Communications Daily, 8/11/93) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 18:46:19 -0400 (EDT) From: LESREEVES@delphi.com Subject: ANAC Codes by NPA Area Code / ANAC # to dial Area Code / ANAC # to dial 201 / 958 205 / 908-222-2222 212 / 958 213 / 114 213 / 1223 213 / 61056 214 / 970-xxxx 215 / 410-xxxx 217 / 200-xxx-xxxx 217 / 290 305 / 200-222-2222 309 / 200-xxx-xxxx 312 / 1-200-5863 312 / 290 312 / 200-xxx-xxxx 313 / 200-222-2222 317 / 310-222-2222 317 / 743-1218 401 / 222-2222 403 / 908-222-2222 404 / 940-xxx-xxxx 407 / 200-222-2222 408 / 300-xxx-xxxx 409 / 970-xxxx 414 / 330-2234 415 / 200-555-1212 415 / 211-2111 415 / 2222 415 / 640 415 / 760 415 / 760-2878 415 / 7600 415 / 7600-2222 502 / 997-555-1212 509 / 560 512 / 200-222-2222 512 / 970-xxxx 516 / 958 517 / 200-222-2222 518 / 997 518 / 998 602 / 593-0809 602 / 593-6017 602 / 593 7451 604 / 1116 604 / 116 604 / 1211 604 / 211 612 / 511 615 / 830 616 / 200-222-2222 617 / 200-xxx-xxxx 617 / 220-2622 618 / 200-xxx-xxxx 618 / 290 713 / 970-xxxx 714 / 211-2121 716 / 511 718 / 958 806 / 970-xxxx 812 / 410-555-1212 815 / 200-xxx-xxxx 815 / 290 817 / 211 817 / 970-xxxx 906 / 200-222-2222 914 / 1-990-1111 914 / 99 914 / 990 914 / 990-1111 915 / 970-xxxx 919 / 711 ------------------------------ From: ajay@rahul.net (Ajay Sanghi) Subject: Looking For DISCRETE MODEM Technology (S/W Modem will do) Organization: a2i network Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 23:34:02 GMT I am looking for a discrete modem technology; by this I mean the old modem technology when maybe just the OPAMS were used to build modems rather than custom chips. Specifically what I want to achieve is to be able to change the carrier frequencies, play with different modulation schemes and filter characteristics keeping intact the telephone line electrical characteristics. I don't know if there are software modules out there where all the above mentioned parameters can be changed. Most probably, these software modules would be written to be executed over a DSP. 1200bps speed, full-duplex is sufficient for me. This request may sound primitive and weird, but trust me, I have a good reason to do so. I thank you for your consideration and help. Please email me your replies. Ajay Sanghi Tel: 408 984-7559, email: ajay@rahul.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 19:24:39 -0700 From: delisle@eskimo.com (Ben Delisle) Subject: I-405 Construction Hotline (Cellular Dial #405) Organization: Eskimo North 206-For-Ever | Public Access Internet & Unix U S West Cellular helps keep drivers moving during construction on I-405. U S West Cellular and the Washington State Department of Transportation are joining forces to help drivers deal with summer construction on Interstate 405 in the Bellevue area, which is expected to cause heavy congestion and lengthy delays. By dialing #405 on their USWC phones, drivers can access the Department of Transportation Hotline and receive up-to-the-minute reports on I-405 traffic conditions. The service begins August 6 and will remain operational throughout the planned 20-day lane closure period. Calls placed to "#405" will be toll and airtime free. Callers can also access the line from the comfort of their home or office by dialing (206)-948-KARS. delisle@eskimo.com ------------------------------ From: John.J.Butz@att.com Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 10:23:53 EDT Subject: EasyReach Service Changes A new EasyReach release cut over this past weekend. I suppose marketing will be sending out brochures to current subscribers to highlight the new features. I'd like to tell you all about one feature that I think is pretty cool. A Subscriber can get back inside the EasyReach subscriber main menu after calling home or calling the forwarding number by pressing "*R" on pre-answer or post-called-party-disconnect conditions. This feature is similar to sequence card calling, in that it saves the subcriber the steps of hanging up, redialing the 700 number, and re-entering the Master PIN. J Butz ER700 Sys Eng jbutz@hogpa.att.com AT&T - CCS ------------------------------ From: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal) Subject: Prototype Unified Areacode Database Now Available by FTP Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 18:33:38 +0000 I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that I was putting together an areacode database in machine-usable form; a first prototype of this is now available for ftp from src.doc.ic.ac.uk:usenet/uk.telecom/ area-codes/areacode.* The file currently covers only those areas in the zone.* files on the telecom archives; Canada isn't covered and Michael Shiels is currently preparing much more detailed listings for the USA. However at 600K already it's worth using as it stands, and I'll be updating the copy on src.doc as regularly as I can. I'd really like people who use areacode info online to fetch this and adapt your own programs to use it -- feed back to me any changes you need in the data format, and pass on any programs that use it for me to add to the archive. Apologies to everyone who has been waiting for this -- there's too many of you to mail individually -- this is the promised announcement. I'm trying to get my own ftp server in place so that subsequent updates will be more timely. Graham PS Anyone sending me big files by mail, *don't* send them to the above address please -- I've set up a user 'ftp@an-teallach.com' that will accept big files without forwarding them to my home machine like my ordinary ID does. (Down an expensive BT phone line...) ------------------------------ From: jadams@athens.cc.bellcore.com (adams,john) Subject: Telecom Feature Interactions Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 15:29:19 GMT Yesterday's snail mail brought (unshredded for a change) concurrent issues from the IEEE highlighting research into a growing topic of concern within the industry, Feature Interaction within the public network. Appropriately, the IEEE Computer Magazine's cover chose a "house of cards" illustration to bring attention to the seriousness of the potential problem. Having read the guest editor's introductions and the two tutorial articles, I'm inclined to believe that there isn't much practical information beyond these. It's a shame that the editor's couldn't have included some of the practical initiatives underway within the industry. The Internetwork Interoperability Test Program (IITP) is making very strong contributions to insuring the integrity of the underlying SS7 network in the US. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 18:07:01 From: apollo@n2sun1.ccl.itri.org.tw (Yee-Lee Shyong) Subject: What Are the Cable Differences? Can anyone tell me what's the difference of cables using in Local Loop (POTS), HDSL, ADSL, and T1? ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 17:07:04 EDT From: ellesson@vnet.IBM.COM Subject: Cannot Share T1? I have been told that SW Bell will not allow a T1 line to be shared across both public switched access and private line services. That is, I am told that they will not permit you to subscribe to one T1 line with, say, 14 channels for dialup POTS service from the local CO switch, and the other 10 dedicated to leased line service for data. Does anyone know why a telco would not consider this to be a reasonable service to offer? (Especially since these services are available from SW Bell over separate T1's.) I would have thought offering such a mixed service would be a simple matter of a few DACS configuration entries. Do all RBOCs have a similar policy? Perhaps this is a matter of regulatory jurisdiction? Ed Ellesson Emerging Technologies IBM Networking Systems Architecture (Standard Disclaimer: IBM may or may not agree) PO Box 12195, C70/673 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 email: ellesson@vnet.ibm.com Phone: 919-254-4115 ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 13:53:02 EDT From: Carl Moore Subject: More Three-Character 'From' Locations (Orange Card) My latest Orange Card bill has several different three-character location codes in the FROM part. Aside from BAL and MAK (I can't figure out what MAK has to do with Delaware), I got the following: 800, for calls from the 717 area; For two calls from 814 area: BED (Bedford?); For calls from Washington County, Md. (area 301): FRD (Frederick?); For one call from Harpers Ferry, W. Va.: MAR (Martinsburg?); For one call on U.S. 340 in Virginia just east of Harpers Ferry, W. Va.: LEE (Leesburg?); From the 215 area: FTW (Fort Washington, Pa.? That's near Philadelphia.) For one call from 908-996 in Frenchtown, NJ: CLI, which I also got from an earlier call from the Clinton, NJ exchange. ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #569 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa18879; 13 Aug 93 7:05 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA27112 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Fri, 13 Aug 1993 02:12:38 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA31776 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Fri, 13 Aug 1993 02:12:00 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1993 02:12:00 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308130712.AA31776@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #570 TELECOM Digest Fri, 13 Aug 93 02:12:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 570 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: How to Change Pager Alert Sound? (Vance Shipley) Re: Writing VoiceMail Program: Any Suggestions? (Paul Robinson) Re: How Does Switched-56 Interwork With ISDN? (Paul Robinson) Re: Flooding in the Midwest (Richard Thomsen) Re: Local Calls via LD Carrier? (Clarence Dold) Re: An Experience With the AT&T Language Line (Jim Rees) Re: Why do I Often Get "Off-Hook" Telco Message on Ans Machine (Ben Burch) Re: Traffic Calculator Wanted (Martin Weiss) Re: 950 Calling Cards (James R. Saker Jr.) Re: CPSR and the NII (Brad Hicks) Re: CPSR and the NII (Michael Peirce) Re: Analysis of Bell Atlantic Cellular (Carl Moore) Re: Analysis of Bell Atlantic Cellular (Jim Rees) Re: Toronto Free-Net FAQ (Rick Broadhead) Last Laugh! Why Light a Candle if You Can Curse the Darkness? (G. Gilder) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Vance Shipley Subject: Re: How to Change Pager Alert Sound? Organization: XeniTec Consulting Services, Kitchener, Ontario Canada Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 11:53:07 GMT In article Jacob DeGlopper writes: > You can not only change the beep cadence, but also add features such > as a priority alert that will make the pager beep even in silent mode > for certain phone numbers. I have a Motorola Advisor alphanumeric pager. I can change the alert with the menu on the pager but what I would like to do is have priority and none priority pages. I want to have my email forwarded to the pager as well as having emergency calls. I would want the emergency pages to use a long, loud alert while the email pages should be either the short beep or the vibrator. Can the Advisor support multiple numbers? Where can I find out what the capabilities of this thing are? Vance Shipley, vances@xenitec.on.ca ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 08:34:26 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM Subject: Re: Writing VoiceMail Program: Any Suggestions? From: Paul Robinson Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA Having used several voice mail systems, I'll mention some features that I have used and liked: 1. Time Stamp: It says the time of the message and if not today, when. For example, today is Wednesday when I wrote this message. A message sent today would be marked "2 47 am..." A message sent to me on Tuesday would be marked as "Yesterday, 4 14 pm...". A message sent Monday would come in "Monday, 3 0 4 am..." A message sent last week would come in "August 3rd, 12 noon..." 2. Timed Call Back: I can tell the system that if I get a message between 10am and 2pm, to call me at a certain number and ask me if I want the message, and all I have to do is input my password, and it will act exactly as if I had called it, giving me the regular prompts and so on. However, any message coming in between 2:01pm and 9:59am is held until 10:00am. The nice thing about this is you can't miss messages. If I call in and retrieve my messages, and there are none left, the system doesn't call me. 3. Help: If I wait too long after a prompt - usually 5 seconds or so - the system will tell me what my options are at that point, like "Press P to play your message again, S to save it and go on to the next message, D to discard, B to back up to the previous message." When using administrative features (such as changing numbers for dial out, passwords, etc.) it prompts for the entries. 4. Variable Help and Type-Through: If I know the system I can set the help level low so that I only get help if I have a problem or are using an unfamiliar feature, but if I don't use the system much, I can leave it on full help and it will walk me through. Also, I can "type ahead" in which I can press keys to do the options at any time when any prompt or announcement is on. 5. Remail and non-remail. I can forward a message to another mailbox on the system or I can mark a message as private so it cannot be forwarded. (Useful for mailboxes used by a group.) 6. Spoken Name: Each mailbox is identified by number until I give it a "spoken name". In addition to the message, I can record a permanent identifier for the mailbox and this identifier is given out for messages from me. 7. Send to others: I can send a message to someone at another telephone number and it will call them and attempt to deliver the message, asking for them by name and asking them to press "1" if they want the message, and allowing them to record a reply. Or I can send a message to another mailbox user. It will put my spoken name on the message unless I don't create a spoken name, in which case it will use the mailbox number. 8. Identify mailbox messages: If a message is from another mailbox user, it will say, before the date, "From " and then the user's own spoken name. 9. Distribution List: I can create a distribution list so that I can enter one identifier and all the people on the list are called and given the message. 10. Broadcast and mixed addressing: I can create a message to be sent to multiple recipients, including users on the system, external users and distribution lists. Just consider any feature available on E-Mail and it is probably useful on voice mail. Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 08:38:36 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM Subject: Re: How Does Switched-56 Interwork With ISDN? From: Paul Robinson Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA > My ideal system would consist of a single plugin card for the PC > at either end, and no separate DSU or TA. > It would also have terminal emulation software for both ends that > can do ZMODEM file transfers and provide a simple 'host mode' (a > la procomm) that lets one PC act as a server which waits for phone > calls, verifies username and password, then lets the caller select > which directory they want to transfer files from/to. As for this, a good choice is a program called "Telemate". Has built-in Zmodem, a script language as powerful as many programming languages, plus a prewritten host script that you can customize for your own interests. Telemate will access a port either (1) via the ROM-BIOS (2) via direct computer-computer connection (3) via a modem (4) via a fossil driver. It should be able to handle most any connection with one of these capabilities. Telemate version 4.00 is on many BBS systems including the SIMTEL-20 mirrors as "TM400-1.ZIP" through "TM400-4.ZIP" in (obviously) four parts. Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 23:26:14 -0600 From: rgt@spitfire.lanl.gov (Richard Thomsen) Subject: Re: Flooding in the Midwest Pat, Last year, during Hurricane Andrew, you posted requests for supplies and such to be sent to help the victims. This year, you have posted articles on the flooding, but no names and addresses of groups for sending help. Do you have any particular groups you recommend or have heard that are doing some real good? It may be nice to post the addresses. By the way, I know of someone who sent some money to the American Red Cross to help out after the hurricane. He was inundated with letters from them ever since asking for more money. He got so miffed at this, that I suspect he will never again send them anything. I did not get inundated with requests, but I did get letters saying "Some neighbors of yours in {northern New Mexico community} are still suffering the result of Hurricane Andrew, and still need your help." I guess I did not realize how extensive the damage was! Richard Thomsen Los Alamos National Laboratory rgt@lanl.gov [Moderator's Note: Yeah, didn't you know that Hurricane Andrew stormed in to New Mexico with a huff and a puff like a Big Bad Wolf and blew down the house where the three pigs lived? Mama Pig stuffs the envel- opes, Baby Pig licks the stamps, and Papa Pig drives to the post office to mail the latest appeal and pick up what money arrived in their post office box the day before that the Post Office Pigs have not yet found out about to steal. Since as any {TV Guide} telemarketing droid could explain to you New Mexico is not part of the United States, it will be necessary for the Pigs to appeal to the Mexican government for help. Regards the unfortunate people around Des Moines and the upper part of the river which flooded first, has the water gone down any at all? The last picture I saw a few days ago showed the same water sitting in the same fields, covering up the same houses, etc. Now the government is saying it is the most costly natural disaster in our history. I guess they are still talking about buying up all the land and having the people move elsewhere. If you have money to spare, send it to the Red Cross in your local community, noting it is for midwest flood victims. Apparently they do not need food, nor clothing, nor ordinary household supplies this time around: just money. So send money to the Red Cross, not to the Pig family post office box! :) PAT] ------------------------------ From: dold@unislc.slc.unisys.com (Clarence Dold) Subject: Re: Local Calls via LD Carrier? Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 15:49:09 GMT paul theodoropoulos (pt@crl.com) wrote: > I have a fuzzy recollection of postings in the Digest some time back > discussing ways to use one's long distance provider to make "local" Assuming you are properly registered with the carrier, which is certainly true if you have selected them as your equal access LD carrier, you can force intra-lata calls to be carried by them, rather than your default regional carrier, by pressing the access code prior to placing any (all) phone call. 503-555-1212 would be routed to your selected LD carrier, 525-1212 would probably be handled by your local carrier. 10288#525-1212 would force the call to be passed to AT&T for handling, rahter than allowing your local carrier to decide whether to handle or pass. Intra-Lata calls currently support the cost of providing "the last mile", so I expect this price break to dissappear in the next several months, as inra-lata traffic is also deregulated. Clarence A Dold - dold@tsmiti.sj.Unisys.COM ...pyramid!ctnews!tsmiti!dold ------------------------------ From: Jim.Rees@umich.edu Subject: Re: An Experience With the AT&T Language Line Date: 12 Aug 1993 16:15:19 GMT Organization: University of Michigan CITI In article , naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org (Christian Weisgerber) writes: > Does anybody have a list of those available? 140 languages sounds like > a lot to cover the globe ... I mean, we're talking about business > languages here, aren't we? I believe India alone has over 100 mutually incomprehensible languages. But Language Line doesn't limit itself to the mutually incomprehensible. A recent message here indicated that it lists both Czech and Slovak, for example. If you include such "close but different" languages, I think India has about 800, China has several hundred, Africa has hundreds, and even the US has several dozen. ------------------------------ From: Ben Burch Subject: Re: Why do I Often Get "Off-Hook" Telco Message on Ans Machine? Organization: Motorola, Inc. Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 17:16:49 GMT In article TELECOM Moderator noted in response to Edward Zotti (ezotti@merle.acns.nwu.edu): > [Moderator's Note: The caller has to hang up sort of in the middle of > the ring the machine is going to answer on. Also, I have seen some machines that don't supervise a ring properly, and they believe they have been rung during line testing. Not too hard a mistake to make. I did several phone answering devices for NT, and it took a bit of work to supervise and count rings correctly in the face of the several different ring cycles defined in the Handbook. Most machines don't do this as they are usually programmed to answer on ring two or above. "I don't speak for Motorola; They don't speak for me." Ben Burch | Motorola Wireless Data Group: Ben_Burch@msmail.wes.mot.com | Good PDAs go EVERYWHERE. ------------------------------ From: mbw@icarus.lis.pitt.edu (Martin Weiss) Subject: Re: Traffic Calculator Wanted Organization: University of Pittsburgh Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 17:37:21 GMT In article , mcharry@cwc.com (McHarry) writes: > At one time I had a neat little program for doing traffic calculations > on a PC. Does anyone know where to find another? It was a lot nicer > than using the tables. I wrote a little C program that computes Erlang-B and Erlang-C recursively. If enough people are interested, I can post it. Martin Weiss University of Pittsburgh Telecommunications Program Department of Information Science ------------------------------ From: jsaker@cwis.unomaha.edu (James R. Saker Jr.) Subject: Re: 950 Calling Cards Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1993 03:57:44 GMT mlevin@nyx.cs.du.edu (Marshall Levin) writes: > dan.srebnick@islenet.com writes: >> I work in a facility served by an ESS CO Centrex. The telephone >> company has a toll restriction on most lines. Unfortunately, this >> seems to restrict outgoing 800 calls as well as the ability to dial a >> 0+ call. I'm looking for a carrier that offers 950 access on their >> calling cards. I am not restricted from dialing 950-xxxx calls. > In addition to being able to use the 800 number, I have found that I > can use my MCI card with 950-1022 by dialing 950-1022 + destination > number + card number. Something you might want to investigate is utilizing a smaller interexchange carrier for your 950 traffic. From my investigation of feature group B service offerings in Nebraska, I discovered that the large carriers typically seem uninterested in residential 950 access (and typically don't have products for it). For example, when I lived just 25 miles north of Omaha (until 2 months ago!), I explored 950 access since I lived in an area serviced by a tiny independent local exchange carrier with a state-wide reputation of excessively charging its customers. (Note: Nebraska's PUC does not regulate local exchange carriers on rates and product offerings). My findings were as follows: AT&T: Sales/customer service folks did not have information available on 950 products. Offered 800 calling card instead (at travel card rates -- much higher than feature group B should be!!!) Sprint:Rep didn't even know what 950 access was. Told me I could 10xxx or be pic'ed to Sprint "since Sprint filed tariffs in your state". I encouraged the rep to try placing a pic on my line, being in a non-equal access prefix! MCI: Actually has a 950 product available (that the sales folks were aware of). However, the product is rated the same as their 800 calling card. LDDS: Not behind our 5ESS at the time (to my knowledge) so not included in the exercise. However, several of the smaller IXCs doing service in our area had competitive feature group products (oriented towards dialer customers actually) which were $0.05 to $0.10 cheaper than calling card products. For those who don't know why 950 access beats the heck out of 800 access from a strict costing perspective, here's a brief explaination of the difference from a interexchange carrier's point of view. A caller originating on feature group B (950) incurs per minute network charges equivelent (or slightly less) than a feature group D (1+, only in equal access areas). In dollars, we're looking at a charge ranging between $0.028/min in larger BOC areas (PACBELL, Bell South) at lower mileage to $0.12/min for tiny independents many miles from the access tandem. Compare this with your 800 access charges (Sprint/AT&T/MCI/WILTEL) which can range anywhere around $0.10 on up and you have a considerable cost differential. So, if you're interested in keeping costs down, negotiate with some of the smaller interexchange carriers on a 950 product. If you can get them down to $0.14/min day and $0.10/min offday, you're doing good! Jamie Saker jsaker@cwis.unomaha.edu Systems Commando Business/MIS Major Telenational Communications Univ. Nebraska at Omaha MyLine: (402) 255-1111 fax: (402) 391-7283 Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are mine and not my employers, nor the University of Nebraska at Omaha's. ------------------------------ From: mc/G=Brad/S=Hicks/OU=0205925@mhs.attmail.com Date: 12 Aug 93 16:53:18 GMT Subject: Re: CPSR and the NII > o ensuring that all citizens have affordable network access and > the training necessary to use these resources. ... > o guaranteeing that the public sector, and particularly schools > and libraries, have access to public data at a reasonable cost. Whenever the CPSR, or any other group, starts talking like this, I get nervous. Very, very nervous. The 64-kilobit question is this: WHO defines "reasonable cost"? The provider or the customer? If "all citizens have affordable network access" then they can't price NII any higher than phone service ... which means one of two things, (a) running it at a loss (hah), or (b) holding a gun to my head again and demanding that I fork over yet more dough. Sigh. Wasn't it Tom Foley who just the other day said that the Democrat tax increases send "a clear message" to the American people: "Stand and deliver"? ("Stand and deliver" is obsolete slang for "stick 'em up, then give me all your dough.") The 30%+ of my gross income that I'm paying in one tax or another isn't good enough, now you want me to pay more, to subsidize every po'bucker and Welfare brat's access to the Internet? You think I'm being mean-spirited? Even after the second-largest tax increase in American history, and even if you believe that Congress will keep its word on the promised cuts (and they never have, so if you do, you're a fool), and even if economic growth does live up to the Clinton administration's estimates, then after five years of increasingly tough "deficit reduction" we'll still be outspending our income by close to a trillion dollars per year. I submit that whatever the benefits of granting Internet access to the poor, they don't justify going further into debt at a time when the US can't make more than token payments on its principal. Internet access already costs a fraction of what it did ten years ago. Leave it alone for ten more years, and it =will= be affordable to everyone. If you screw with it, you'll break it. NII: The liberals' answer to SDI. J. Brad Hicks Internet: mc!Brad_Hicks@mhs.attmail.com X.400: c=US admd=ATTMail prmd=MasterCard sn=Hicks gn=Brad ------------------------------ From: peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org (Michael Peirce) Subject: Re: CPSR and the NII Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 14:50:23 PST Organization: Peirce Software Reply-To: peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org (Michael Peirce) In article , booloo@framsparc.ocf.llnl. gov wrote: > "We were excited to discover that CPSR is in a position to play a key > role in shaping NII policy," said CPSR Board President, Eric Roberts. It may (or may not) be well and good that the CPSR can lobby its way into getting to influence policy in Washington, but is there anyone out there besides me that get's ticked off when they start sounding like they represent all "computer professionals"? They sure don't represent me, nor most of the "computer professionals" that I know, and I resent their attempt at coming across as such. They should least change the title of their press released to say "Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility add social concience to national network debate". Michael Peirce peirce@outpost.sf-bay.org Peirce Software Suite 301, 719 Hibiscus Place San Jose, California USA 95117 Makers of: voice: +1.408.244.6554 fax: +1.408.244.6882 Smoothie -- AppleLink: peirce & America Online: AFC Peirce ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 12:16:22 EDT From: Carl Moore Subject: Re: Analysis of Bell Atlantic Cellular Seven digits within the same area code; area code + seven digits if calling a different area code; Where is this being used from? What about time-outs or N0X/N1X prefixes or the coming of NNX area codes? ------------------------------ From: Jim.Rees@umich.edu Subject: Re: Analysis of Bell Atlantic Cellular Date: 12 Aug 1993 17:08:18 GMT Organization: University of Michigan CITI In article , Paul Robinson writes: > Airtime charges begin when the "send" key is pressed. As anyone who has seen a cellular phone bill can tell you, the "SND" key is short for "SpeND," not "SeND." ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 23:33:58 EDT From: Rick Broadhead Subject: Re: Toronto Free-Net FAQ Pat, The Toronto Free-Net FAQ that was posted on TELECOM Digest is an abridged version. Anyone who would like a complete copy is welcome to e-mail me. Rick Broadhead Internet: ysar1111@vm1.yorku.ca Director, Toronto Free-Net ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Aug 93 00:16 GMT From: George Gilder <0004091174@mcimail.com> Subject: Last Laugh! Why Light a Candle if You Can Curse the Darkness? Surely Pan Am Telecom (PAT) will soon begin service delivering dark fiber communications now that the FCC has ruled that the RBOCs must also accomodate the forces of darkness. [Virtual Moderator responds: Ahem ... did I just hear my name taken in vain? Well George, its like my pastor, the Reverend Bob Dobbs of the Church of the Sub-Genius once said, "--ck 'em if they can't take a joke ..." Stick around with us for awhile, okay? This newsgroup gets almost as hysterical as some of the things I used to read in dear old Malcomb's magazine before he departed this vail of tears. PAT] ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #570 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa26444; 13 Aug 93 15:02 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA24132 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Fri, 13 Aug 1993 10:26:53 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA30904 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Fri, 13 Aug 1993 10:26:13 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1993 10:26:13 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308131526.AA30904@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #571 TELECOM Digest Fri, 13 Aug 93 10:26:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 571 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson The Information "Free"way (Rob Slade) Re: Radar and Acronyms (A. Padgett Peterson) Re: Radar and Acronyms (Michael Jennings) Re: Radar Detectors (John Stanley) Re: LORAN -- LOng Range Aid to Navigation (Jack Winslade) Re: Valid Card Declared Invalid? (Andy Sherman) Re: Bell Atlantic Mobile Cell Features (Lee Sweet) Re: Pay-Phone Wanted -- Where to Get? (Michael G. Katzmann) Re: Un-directory (Ray Normandeau) Re: What is Category 5 (re: ISDN) (Al Varney) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: roberts@decus.arc.ab.ca (Rob Slade) Subject: The Information "Free"way Date: 12 Aug 1993 15:58:59 -0500 Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway Hannen Swaffer, about 1928: "Freedom of the press in Britain is freedom to print such of the proprietor's prejudices as the advertisers don't object to". Currently popular "siggy" and tagline quote on the nets: "Freedom of the press belongs to those who own one". From an article in the Vancouver Sun of August 3, 1993 (originally by John Duncan and Nick Pront in the Toronto Star): "Computer information networks free to the general public have been carrying chatter about Karla Teale's manslaughter trial, including details that fall under the judge's publication ban". (I should, for those few non-Canadians on the mailing list, give a brief resume of the case. Karla and Paul Bernardo have been charged with the murders, sex related, of school aged girls. They are being tried separately. Their marriage has apparently broken up. Paul Bernardo legally changed his name to Paul Teale; Karla is being referred to as Teale as well. Paul has not yet stood trial. Karla has, has been convicted, and the judge imposed a publication ban on the trial.) I won't go into detail on the Sun article. Some of the text is reasonable; some is incorrect. The important thing is the fact that information banned from publication in the press is available on computer networks and conferencing systems. There is one other absolutely fascinating aspect: according to an expert media lawyer quoted in the article the posters are probably not breaking the law. Apparently the publication ban covers only material obtained from the court. Publication of the same information, if obtained from other sources, is permissible. Let us look first at the gathering and dissemination of the information itself. This is only the latest of many recent examples of information distribution being better served by the mere existence of the technology than the efforts of the media. Although the relative numbers of those involved with computer networks are relatively small, in comparison with either the general population or the professional media, the technology allows for much more effective management of information. Information can be accessed or restricted by subject, date and even author. In contrast, the professional media may give you some slight sorting by broad topical outlines, but you only get today's events, unless you make extra efforts to create your own archives, and rarely know who wrote or researched a piece. A system like Usenet, therefore, can generate the equivalent of fifty to one hundred fat novels *per day*, and still remain accessible. This allows for the discussion of quite limited and specialized interests, without the need for censorship on the basis of topic. (I will freely admit that there *is* a desperate need for censorship on the bases of grammar, style and coherence ...) As well, the networks, unlike the professional media, are directly interactive. In the case of the Sun article, I might wish to correct the reference to BBSes as "information highways", since that term has only recently come into use as a specialized reference to an upgraded "backbone" for research institutions. Were such an article to be posted on a computer network, I could immediately do so, either sending a reply to the author, or, if I felt that my trivial detail was of sufficient interest to the world as a whole, "posting" a reply in that particular "conference", "newsgroup" or "echo". If I wish to reply to the printed article, I have to find the mailing address for the Sun, generate a physical letter, find an envelope and stamp and take it to the post office. Then, assuming the editors of the Sun can stop laughing long enough, *they* have to find the address of the Toronto Star and forward it on. In the unlikely event that anyone at either the Sun or the Star thought it worthwhile, my article might be printed in a few of the papers to print the original article, about a month after everyone had forgotten that there even was an original article. Now, I have an unfair advantage in critiquing the Sun article: this is a specialized field and I am a specialist. Very few of the general populace even *care* that electronic bulletin board systems are not called "billboards". Journalists, after all, are selected on the basis of journalism degrees, which does tend to cut down on the number of other specialties one can acquire. "online" computer users, on the other hand, are selected only on the basis of possession of a computer, a telephone and a modem. This doesn't really exclude all that many people, and very few "classes" of people. (The very poor, perhaps. They can borrow, as many of us do.) This means that there is a very broad diversity of background available to the net as a whole. Another advantage the net has is dispersion. Most computer networks have connections in most of the developed world, and some in large parts of the developing world as well. Individual workers in the professional media may have a few contacts in scattered places that they can call by phone, but only a select few have the ability to travel as they please. Even these few media stars do not, and cannot, have the constant, even daily, interaction that "net" workers have with dozens of contacts in other countries and continents. In common with anyone in the "online community" I have friends that I found through mutual interests, and have developed over the years. However, were I to select new fields of interest, I would likely be able to obtain twenty to fifty valuable contacts within the first week of joining a new topic. It is this diffused nature of the net that leads to the legal aspects briefly discussed on the article. The media is prevented from publishing any material obtained directly from the trial itself. The professional media, however, cannot afford to develop arcane contacts simply for this one story, and therefore the trial goes unreported. The net, on the other hand, already has more arcane contacts than you can shake a stick at. In addition to those directly on the net, there are "friends of friends" which extend its reach greatly. The population of the net can be estimated (no one knows its true size with any certainty) at about two million people. Given that the average person has about two thousand acquaintances, the number of people in indirect contact with the net approaches the total population of the earth. (This estimate, of course, neglects a great many factors, not least the duplication of friendships. Still, it is a figure to give one pause.) The net, then, as an entity, has contacts that the most lavishly funded media outlet can only dream of. The publication ban which the courts can impose on the media is meaningless in the context of the net. The law, and most governments, are completely unaware of the scope of the net in this regard. Politicians, fortunately or unfortunately, are too busy devoting their efforts to getting elected to keep abreast of such recent technological advances as the move from vacuum tubes to transistors. All sarcasm aside, however, only those with direct experience of computer networks can even partially understand their breadth and reach. Governments may be blissfully unaware of the developing cyberspace, or they may take panicked and ineffectual action against some imagined threat. Or, should some of the leadership come to the beginnings of an understanding of the nature of "inter"networking, they might start to use the powers of the net for the better governance of regions and nations; assessing the mood of the populace, interoffice communications, research and so forth. (The nets are woefully ineffectual as propaganda tools, but you can't have everything.) I have throughout this editorial contrasted, in a sense, the computer networks with the established order. This contrast is highly unnecessary. As just noted, established institutions ignore the new technology at their peril. They need not, however, fear it in all cases. Already some few of the professional media are doing research on the nets for articles which then appear in print and on the electronic media. Class assignment for next week: would it be illegal for a paper to research the Bernardo/Teale trials through the computer networks, and publish that material? Would it be illegal for a reporter to research the trials through the nets and thus have a head start on the competition once the publication ban is lifted? copyright Robert M. Slade, 1993 Vancouver ROBERTS@decus.ca Institute for Robert_Slade@sfu.ca Research into rslade@cue.bc.ca User p1@CyberStore.ca Security Canada V7K 2G6 ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 09:24:56 -0400 From: padgett@tccslr.dnet.mmc.com (A. Padgett Peterson) Subject: Re: Radar and Acronyms otto@vaxb.acs.unt.edu wrote: >> FUBAR > Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition. Actually this is a "dual use" acronym probably invented by the military containing a local meaning (among equals) and an "official" meaning (subordinate to superior or vica-versa e.g. son to mother). Pronouncing acronyms is old hat for Americans dating at least back into the 1800s (Wobblies for IWW members) and was picked up early by the military (during WWI the Curtis model JN was immediatelly dubbed the "Jenny" and when a General Purpose vehicle was designed by for the Army, with some influence by a "Popeye" character of the time, it became the "Jeep". The first multiple definition acronym that I am aware of was SNAFU duning WWII or "Situation Normal, All F...ed Up" from this was derived, FUBB (F...ed Up Beyond Belief), FUBAR (above), and, in the Air Force the B-52 became BUFF (Big Ugly Fat F....er) in this case the "public" translation was "Fellow". The most creative one I know of is IHTFP which, often posted in public ares was "officially" translated as "I Have Truely Found Paradise" and in private as "I Hate This F...ing Place". Since military technicians often became civilian technicians and engineers, this tradition has carried forward in RTFM and RTFM-P ("Read The F...ing Manual" and "Read The F...ing Manual - Please !") though pronunciation is not easy. Of course in E-Mail, pronunciation is unnecessary 8*). Warmly, Padgett ------------------------------ From: M.J.Jennings@amtp.cam.ac.uk (Michael Jennings) Subject: Re: Radar and Acronyms Organization: University of Cambridge, DAMTP Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1993 03:39:37 GMT In article dave@westmark.com (Dave Levenson) writes: > In article , Cliff Sharp chi.il.us> writes: >> LORAN - LOng RAnge Navigation >> ELF - Extremely Low Frequency (which is among the hierarchy: > and lots more, to which I would like to add: > NTSC - National Television Standards Committee > " - Never Twice the Same Color > And whilst we're at it, the two competing TV systems: PAL - Phase alternation line - Picture always lousy SECAM - (Something in French I can't remember) - System even crappier than American method Michael ------------------------------ From: stanley@skyking.oce.orst.edu (John Stanley) Subject: Re: Radar Detectors Date: 13 Aug 1993 04:44:48 GMT Organization: Coastal Imaging Lab, College of Oceanography In article Cliff Sharp writes: > I do notice, however, that most drivers who _really_ speed (i.e., > 20+ MPH over the limit) do not have a radar detector visible. I have noticed here in Oregon, when I get a chance to use I-5, that most people who speed do not have radar detectors. Even those who are 20 over. I know. I have been watching carefully. Especially the really fast ones. I bought a Gunn microwave emitter at Dayton last year. The fast ones would be the most fun. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Aug 93 05:37:24 CST From: Jack.Winslade@axolotl.omahug.org (Jack Winslade) Subject: Re: LORAN -- LOng Range Aid to Navigation Reply-To: jack.winslade%drbbs@axolotl.omahug.org Organization: DRBBS Technical BBS, Omaha > Although now most LORAN sites are becoming automated, the biggest > threat for Coast Guard people for many years was sending someone > to isolated duty on a LORAN station in the middle of no where. Years ago I spent time at the LORAN stations at Orote Point, Guam and Saipan, about 100 miles north of Guam. These were not nearly as bad as some of the other, such as Tern Island, French Frigate Shoales or Attu Island in the Aleutians. > Back several years ago when President Reagan bombed Omar Quedaffi > he fought back by trying to bomb the LORAN Station on Lampadusa, > a small island off of Italy. The bomb fell short. If I remember my LORAN trivial correctly, MEDSEC (Coast Guard) had a LORAN station in Libya up until a political p*ssing incident in the early 1970's. I forget any details of that incident. When I was involved in LORAN, the older LORAN-A was being phased out and the newer (now standard) LORAN-C was being phased in. Other than the fact that C was more accurate, it had a much greater range, thus fewer stations were needed for any given coverage area. Obtelecom: In 'another conference' there has been some recent discussion on using LORAN signals (derived from an atomic frequency standard) to calibrate oscillators in T1 (and similar) equipment, thus making it more resistant to sync slips. Good day, JSW Happy Birthday TELECOM Digest -- Happy Birthday DRBBS (1:285/666.0) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 22:41:17 EDT From: andys@internet.sbi.com (Andy Sherman) Subject: Re: Valid Card Declared Invalid? In article 7@eecs.nwu.edu, Pat the Moderator notes: > [Moderator's Note: Oh? Stuff going through 10xxx is not validated by > the local telco? Then how come when I wanted to change the PIN on my > AT&T Calling Card and had to ask twice to get it done, the second time > the rep at AT&T said "I will send a FAX to Illinois Bell right now and > ask what is the delay in processing this," ?? And how come she later > said IBT had lost the original order to do it? I believe that anything > dialed via 10xxx is first examined -- in its entirety -- by the local > telco, and then is handled, passed to a carrier, treated or whatever. > How come whenever I want to change calling plans or do anything with > my AT&T account the answer is always it will be done whenever Illinois > Bell gets around to it, etc.? PAT] Pat, you're confusing a lot of different interactions between IXCs and LECs, and assuming that they're all connected. a) When you dial 10xxx+number, the end office switch waits to get the entire number you are dialing before routing the call, so they can grab inter-LATA calls, make sure you don't try to carrier-select an 800 call, etc. Once they route the call to the IXC, they are out of the DTMF interpretation business. You get the bong from the IXC switch, and it gets your digits. b) If Illinois Bell had to execute the PIN change on your card, I would assume it was the old-style card using your real phone number plus a PIN. In that case, the LEC was the number issuer, not AT&T. These days, AT&T will still validate any LEC issued card number for an AT&T call. AT&T also provides validation services to the LECs for local calls billed to the new style CIID numbers issued by AT&T. c) The reason why IBT is in the loop on your calling plan changes is that IBT is still providing billing service for AT&T. That has nothing to do with how the network does routing and card verification, but has everything to do with how AT&T still does its measurement, rating, and billing. Andy Sherman Salomon Inc - Unix Systems Support - Rutherford, NJ (201) 896-7018 - andys@sbi.com or asherman@sbi.com ------------------------------ From: decrsc!leesweet@uunet.UU.NET (Lee Sweet) Subject: Re: Bell Atlantic Mobile Cell Features Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1993 13:51:26 -0400 (EDT) One correction, I believe ... the latest bill has a flyer that implies that follow-me roaming is now *automatic* for BAM customers. It says you can disable this, but not permanently ... i.e., like the way follow-me used to be, you have to enable it (then) or disable it (now) daily. Anyone have more details/experience with this? Seems like it would have to be permanently-disable-able, like call-waiting and three-way calling. (These are an extra monthly charge [automatically applied to your bill!] if you didn't/don't call BAM and say "don't want it!".) Lee Sweet Internet *lists* - leesweet@datatel.com Chief Systems Consultant Internet *e-mail* - lee@datatel.com Datatel, Inc. Phone - 703-968-4661 4375 Fair Lakes Court FAX - 703-968-4625 Fairfax, VA 22033 (Opinions are my own, and only my own!) ------------------------------ From: slc1!vk2bea!michael@uunet.UU.NET (Michael G. Katzmann) Subject: Re: Pay-Phone Wanted -- Where to Get? Date: 12 Aug 93 17:23:37 GMT Reply-To: slc1!vk2bea!michael@uunet.UU.NET (Michael G. Katzmann) Organization: Broadcast Sports Technology, Crofton. Maryland. In article hudel@waterloo.hp.com (Christopher Hudel) writes: > I'd like to put one of those old (or not so old) pay-phones in my > apartment as a "novelty" item and wonder if anybody knows where I can > pick one up and approximately how much I should expect to pay. I picked up an unused COCOT (WECO housing / Elcotel electronics) at a hamfest for $100. (I think they normally go for around $1000) M H Z electronics in Phoenix, which is a second hand electronics outlet had some GTE phone co (dumb) and WECO wall mount (like at the airport) phone co phones, when I was there last. Might be worth a call. Michael Katzmann Broadcast Sports Technology Inc. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Crofton, Maryland. U.S.A NV3Z / VK2BEA / G4NYV michael@vk2bea.UUCP ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Un-directory From: ray.normandeau@factory.com (Ray Normandeau) Date: 12 Aug 93 17:11:00 GMT Organization: Invention Factory's BBS - New York City, NY - 212-274-8298v.32bis Reply-To: ray.normandeau@factory.com (Ray Normandeau) > When I call the UnDirectory service I usually can get three lookups a > minute, but to get that rate I have to interrupt the spoken prompts and > punch in digits fast. If the names and addresses are long, three listings > take longer than a minute. You could pre-program them in temporary memory locations of a memory dialer for even more speed. One unadvertised UnDirectory feature I've found that speeds lookups: When I make a mistake during number entry, I can press * to erase the last digit. The voice states the remaining last three digits so I know where I am in the ten-digit number. (Pressing # during digit entry erases everything and I have to begin again.) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 18:51:29 CDT From: varney@ihlpe.att.com Subject: Re: What is Category 5 (re: ISDN) Organization: AT&T In article goldstein@carafe.tay2. dec.com (Fred R. Goldstein) writes: > In article hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu > (Harold Hallikainen) writes: > The NEXT (near-end cross talk) is easy. The FEXT isn't terribly > tough. What kills things is the junk in the middle. {You bet -- and unfortunately without the middle, you got no loop!!} > ... While ISDN lines are not supposed to have bridge taps (little > stubs off the middle), the reality is that bridge taps happen. And a > little bit of bridge tap creates whopping echo somewhere, which the > chip tries to cancel. We actually verified (unwanted!) bridge taps on > lines which were still sort of working, but not working well enough to > be useful. [...] Hmmm! Assuming your idea of an ISDN "line" is the same as mine (2B1Q U interface outside customer prem.), then howcome there's something like 16 test configurations that a "U" interface has to handle, and most have multiple bridge taps and multiple cable guages??? One has, if I recall correctly, a bridge tap off of a bridge tap. Are you saying ISDN wasn't reliable over a 2B1Q two-wire interface with a bridge tap? Or were you talking about the S/T interface (four-wire)? Even the pre-ANSI AT&T U interface would handle 12000 ft. with a bridge tap or two. > Digital lines are not like 3002s; they don't have the same terminators > and may have different repeaters. And no bridge taps :-). Maybe you are talking "T1" (DS1 rate) lines with taps -- they can be a problem only because there's no echo-canceling at the bipolar level on these four-wire circuits. For ISDN, the TELCos do NOT want to have to "groom" every BRI line to remove all the lint. :) Al Varney - just my opinion ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #571 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa00873; 13 Aug 93 19:12 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA12998 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Fri, 13 Aug 1993 16:35:30 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA16418 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Fri, 13 Aug 1993 16:34:50 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1993 16:34:50 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308132134.AA16418@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #572 TELECOM Digest Fri, 13 Aug 93 16:34:45 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 572 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Review of HyperACCESS/5 (Rob Slade, DECrypt Editor) Hearing Impairment (was Another Side of Alex Bell) (A. Padgett Peterson) New Directory Assistance Charges in Canada (David Leibold) Any Use For Dead ATT 510 Console? (Andy Meijers) Positions Available at the University of Arizona (Walt Moody) Wiring/Schematics/Info on Merlin? (Gregory J. Nelson) New Jersey Pulls the Plug on Computer-Dialed Calls (Thomas Hinders) Caller ID Box With Serial Port From AT&T (Russell Kroll) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 13 Aug 93 14:44 -0600 From: Rob Slade, DECrypt Editor Subject: Review of HyperACCESS/5 This is a series on antiviral programs, right? So what am I doing reviewing a terminal emaulation program? Well, HyperACCESS/5 is both. I first heard about HA5 several years ago when I first started doing antiviral reviews. I have only recently, though, been able to get a copy. Without further ado, then: PCHA5.RVW 930809 Comparison Review Company and product: Hilgraeve Inc. 111 Conant Ave., #A Monroe, MI 48161 800-826-2760 313-243-0576 fax: 313-243-0645 BBS: 313-243-5915 HyperACCESS/5 3.0 Rating (1-4, 1 = poor, 4 = very good) "Friendliness" Installation 1 Ease of use 2 Help systems 2 Compatibility 3 Company Stability 2 Support 2 Documentation 2 Hardware required 2 Performance 3 Availability 2 Local Support 1 General Description: Feature rich communications and terminal emulation program, but definitely for the advanced user. Comparison of features and specifications User Friendliness Installation I was surprised to find, given Hilgraeve's emphasis on virus detection, that the disks, five 360Ks and three 720Ks, were shipped unprotected. Installation, interestingly, is not covered in the manual. Amongst the ads for Compuserve, Dow-Jones, NewsNet, OAG and other goodies, is a flyer labelled "Quick Install Guide". The only information on the installation is that you run the INSTALL program. (Installation apparently makes no attempt to add to your "path": you are directed to change to the HyperACCESS directory before running the program.) The manual does, however, list the files supplied, and their functions, in Appendix J. Installation, due to the fact that files are shipped compressed, is a fairly lengthy process, taking 45 minutes on the old XT test machine. It is not very dependable, either, missing some of the options that it specifically asked me about during the process. The only information about the disk space needed is a comment on the card that you could install it to a 1.2 meg or larger floppy. The INSTALL program at one point gives you the option of a "full" installation taking up 1.1 megs of space, or a 400K minimal installation. Unlike some other programs which allow this kind of customization, you are only offered these two options, with nothing in between. In any case, it turns out to be nonsense. The program will not install if there is less than 1.5 megs of disk space available. I thought this might have been due to decompression needs, but, in fact, this is the size needed for a full install. Therefore, you *cannot*, in contradiction to both the documentation and the INSTALL program, install to a floppy disk. I am not sure what the minimal installation might be after you have deleted extraneous files, but I estimate it to be about 1 meg. Ease of use While beginners will find HyperACCESS reasonably easy to use, it is likely to be the "Power User" who is really interested in this program. There are a range of fascinating features, such as the ability to use the mouse to choose options from the screen, even on strictly text based systems. Hilgraeve obviously sees PROCOMM as the competition, and has followed, to a certain extent, the "one key command" philosophy. Not entirely; many of the HyperACCESS functions must be chosen from a menu. In certain cases, however, HyperACCESS has chosen a better route. Many of the "one key" commands are more intuitive (Alt-H for help, for instance) and the menu and screen layouts are more comprehensible. Unfortunately, many of the screens and functions are much less intuitive, and the program takes some getting used to. Once you start getting into the settings for various functions, this is definitely for experienced users only. One example: sending ASCII text. This is a fairly normal function, in that many users will compose a message "offline", and then send it to the BBS, email or text editing systems they are using on the "host" computer. Many "host" systems will present a "prompt" at the beginning of each line, and it is best to "wait" before sending the next line. HyperACCESS/5 has a feature to do so, and it is unthreateningly called "wait for this character after sending each line". However, the prompt character to wait for must be entered as a hexadecimal representation. (An "ASCII" character chart is provided. As usual, it covers not only the "proper" 7 bit ASCII characters but the 8 bit IBM PC graphics characters as well.) The script language, HyperPilot, is extensive and seems to owe much to the C language. The table of contents alone for the language reference chapter is three and a half pages of very dense type. Chapter eleven, however, does give a briefer overview of the more common commands. Once again, this is a compiled script situation. Scripts that have not been pre-compiled with be so after the first usage, if the proper files are all available. Help systems Alt-H is a "universal" help key, but this is another program where if you don't know the answer already, you are going to have a hard time finding it in the help system. Compatibility An interesting feature is the ability to "import" a Procomm dialling directory file. The program is also available for OS/2 and, in fact, is shipped with both versions on disk. VT terminal emulation is generally good. File transfer protocols are generally good, although there is a problem with Kermit uploading. Company Stability Hilgraeve, and HyperACCESS 5, has been around for a while. They have not obtained a great "presence" in the communications software industry. Company Support The usual. Documentation The documentation consists of one manual, plus the easily overlooked "Quick Install Guide" flyer. In general, the manual is clear and well laid out. (Small boxed "marginal notes" are sprinkled throughout the manual, and are generally very helpful hints and points.) However, it is at this point that the package deserts the "Power User". While the general information on how to use the program is all there, the details on many of the more interesting points are lacking. Many times, in reading the manual, I just got to the point where I felt the next few pages would give me an explanation of a particularly intriguing aspect of HyperACCESS/5, only to find that the next page was a new topic or chapter. The intermediate user will be easily able to grasp and use the basic functions of the terminal program; the advanced user is left wondering whether the experimentation necessary is worth the effort to see if a specific advanced feature lives up to its billing. System Requirements Must install to a hard disk. May be able to run from HD floppies if copied over. Performance HyperACCESS has a number of features not normally associated with terminal emulation programs. As mentioned previously, some of these, such as the ability to "choose" menu options, on "text only" systems, with a mouse, are minor but handy. HyperACCESS/5, like PROCOMM, has a "host" mode. The menus provided to the caller are not as pretty as those of PROCOMM, but the functionality is all there. Again, since it is "built-in", there is no need for programming on the part of the HyperACCESS user. The security aspects are also much better on HyperACCESS/5: there are multiple options which can be allowed or denied. One proviso - the program ships with an "unlimit" password which, as it implies, allows unlimited access. The "unlimit" password does not require a specific "account" name. I would strongly recommend that all purchasers delete this entry, even if they do not plan to use the "host" option. The most bizarre of HyperACCESS's features is virus checking. This is intended to catch viral programs, or infected files, as they are being downloaded. Note that there are the same limitations with this virus checker as with any other: compressed or archived files, or files otherwise manipulated for transmission, may "hide" viral infections. (HyperACCESS/5 does implicitly recognize this: another function is the ability to "unzip" ZIP format archives. This only works with PKZIP 1.1 format archives.) The READ.ME documentation states that HyperACCESS *is* able to find viral infections "inside" ZIP files, and I was able to generate a virus detection alarm with some very common infections that had been compressed with the PKZIP 1.1 format. The default, by the way, is that virus checking is off. I strongly suspect that "uploading" is not checked. (Hilgraeve used to "advertise" HyperACCESS/5 with a virus checking "copy" program called HCOPY. This is apparently still available on the Hilgraeve BBS, but I have not seen it on other boards.) A chapter is devoted to the additional benefits of "HA5 to HA5" communications; in other words, calling another HyperACCESS/5 equipped computer. This is primarily concerned with promoting the proprietary HyperProtocol file transfer protocol. Some mention is made of "time delayed" and "automatic" calls, but this can also be done with "normal" systems and the script language. Local Support None provided. Support Requirements The intermediate user should be able to access the basic features of the program. (Some problems with installation may inhibit initial use.) Even the advanced user will need to devote several hours, and possibly days, to the initial setup and learning more than the most modest features. copyright Robert M. Slade, 1993 PCHA5.RVW 930809 ============== Vancouver p1@arkham.wimsey.bc.ca | You realize, of Institute for Robert_Slade@sfu.ca | course, that these Research into rslade@cue.bc.ca | new facts do not User p1@CyberStore.ca | coincide with my Security Canada V7K 2G6 | preconceived ideas btw, my wife just reminded me that not only is today Friday the 13th (have *you* done your scan today?) but it is also "Left Handers" Day. She said that "they" must *still* think left handed people are pretty "sinister" to make it a Friday the 13th. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Aug 93 08:35:39 -0400 From: padgett@tccslr.dnet.mmc.com (A. Padgett Peterson) Subject: Hearing Impairment (was Another Side of Alex Bell) This bothers me to a certain extent. What we have is a gifted person trying to change a culture. Rightly or wrongly is not an issue, it is merely a fact that was. Certainly he was influenced heavily by his family and by living with the hearing impaired at a time when prothetics were of limited usefulness. *But he was trying.* As one who has required hearing aids for over twenty years, I have some experience in the matter. I am just fortunate enough that prothetic art has progressed dramatically in that time. For me the greatest challenge has always been when teaching and trying to understand student's questions. In this reguard, the latest generation of hearing aids (I have a new pair of Danavox DCEs) are a tremendous improvement. From this I also have certain opinions: First deafness can be divided into two categorys, those who can achieve acceptable hearing with prothetics and those who cannot. For the first group, "mainstreaming" is an economic question since good hearing aids are not cheap (though figures I saw a number of years ago indicate about a 700% markup at the retail level from what the VA pays - before I get any flames from the hearing aid vendors, I realize the effort required in testing, fitting, moldmaking, and followups). Second, there are certain advantages to "being able to turn the world off" (such as when my son had colic and my wife would hand him to me after removing my aids 8*) so it is not all bad. True, for those who are completely deaf, there is no question that special handling and education is needed but I suspect that these are comparatively rare in comparison to those who, like Mr. Bell's mother, merely need proper augmentation (from the depiction in the movie, I would estimate that she was 60-70 db "down"). Personally, I am opposed to a "separate sub-culture" since separation denies access to certain mainstream activities. Consider that fewer than 1% of the world's computers are connected to the Internet and how you would feel if it were not there. Most people are not even aware it exists. Further, consider that while some people refuse to wear hearing aids, few shun a microphone. I fail to see the difference. Finally, I would like to mention that "proper" hearing is a matter of perception and IMHO the "average" person is far deafer than I am ! For years my hearing aids have had inductive pick-ups designed for help with telephones (you should have known I would get around to something TELECOM related eventually). By flicking a switch I can turn off the microphone and turn on the pick-up. You might wonder why it is not on all the time - simply because I would be driven to destraction by all of the inaudible sounds! The fist time I noticed this was while designing large military gas turbine engine conrols for Pratt & Whitney in the 1970s (translation: working on the F-100 engine that powers the F-16 and F-15). The test stands were quite noisy and one time instead of just turning off my hearing aids (they function quite effectively as earplugs when off) I put then into "telephone" mode and a whole new world of sounds appeared. I could hear the clicks of the pump relays, the jingles of the igniters (which changed pitch when the engine caught), and all of the myriad electrical noises which an engine creates. Soon I could tell what was happening before it would register on the gauges and by listening to the sounds could tune an engine to increase thrust and reduce fuel consumption beyond all expectations. To my "deaf" colleages, this was magic. Today I tune my cars and my computers the same way much as an external modem will tell a receptive listener the progress of a call but to many it is still magic. "Hearing" the spark plugs firing can tell as much as watching the ignition on an oscilloscope. (IMHO more 8*) One time a number of people in the corner of a building where I worked in Texas complained of headaches. Untracable. My hearing aid found that when the headaches occurred I would hear a periodic BEEP from the RADAR unit across the runway - when occationally pointed at the building people got headaches for no medical reason. Another time a friend complained that she always became depressed when she sat on the end of a sofa. For some reason the house wiring gave off a sharp and localized 60 hz hum right at that spot. Moved the sofa 18 inches away and no more depression. Magic. I told her "the vibes are not right here." - and was literally true. Deafness is a matter of viewpoint. Warmly, Padgett ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Aug 93 11:19 EDT From: djcl@io.org (woody) Subject: New Directory Assistance Charges in Canada The Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) approved a wider scope of charges for directory assistance services on Tuesday this week. This applies to BC Tel, AGT (Alberta), and Bell Canada (Ontario and Quebec). The decision moves directory assistance charging closer in nature to the sort of charges incurred in the U.S. This was announced as CRTC Telecom Order 93-685. The use of a Telecom Order is noteworthy, considering that rulings on public proceedings like the directory assistance matter are usually rendered as a Telecom Decision rather than a Telecom Order. This means: Long distance directory assistance (LDDA) requests (555.1212 calls) will be chargeable. In Bell Canada's case, this will be 50 cents per call. Exemptions will apply from hospitals, specific mobile or toll station uses, for the disabled, for those at least 65 years of age, and possibly some types of public phones (like payphones) though that didn't seem clear in the decision. Calls to 1-800 assistance remain toll-free. Bell Canada wanted to charge for local directory assistance (LDA) calls for numbers that are "out-of-book": those numbers that are new since the last directory, or have been changed. The CRTC denied this request and ordered that such inquiries not be chargeable. That aspect of the Order was based on the local service nature of such requests, and the inability to obtain such numbers by other means. Charges for numbers "in-book" could be justified in that a directory is already provided to subscribers; calling an operator for a listed number is a redundant effort for which a charge can be justified. Maritime Tel & Tel in Nova Scotia is reported to have LDDA charges already, according to {The Toronto Star}. These are 95 cents per LDDA call, much higher than Bell, BC Tel and AGT would be charging (each 50 cents per LDDA call). The issue of providing telco data to allow for competing directory assistance services was left as a separate issue to be dealt with at another time. The last part of the decision text reads: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The proposed tariff revisions submitted by AGT under Tariff Notice 330, BC TEL under Tariff Notice 2705 and Bell under Tariff Notice 4505, as amended by Tariff Notice 4505A, are given final approval amended as described below: 1. Requests for out-of-book LDA shall continue to be provided at no charge. 2. BC TEL and Bell are directed to provide LDA/LDDA exemptions for calls from the disabled and those with special needs. 3. Bell is directed to extend its proposed LDA exemption for calls from subscribers over 65 years of age to include LDDA. 4. AGT is directed to exempt LDA calls from federal and provincial hospitals. 5. AGT is directed to indicate in its tariffs that LDDA calls to 1 + 800 + 555-1212 are exempt from an LDDA charge. 6. AGT and BC TEL are directed to charge for LDA and LDDA requests for company telephone numbers. 7. The companies are directed to file, within 14 days, tariff pages reflecting the appropriate effective date. David Leibold ------------------------------ From: s9d3002@drms.dla.mil (Andy Meijers) Subject: Any Use For Dead ATT 510 Console? Date: 13 Aug 93 14:12:46 GMT Organization: Defense Logistics Service Center, Battle Creek MI As part of a misc. lot at a state government auction, I ended up with a ATT 510 operator? console, as was standard issue with the old System 85s, etc. Combo phone, speakerphone, squishy touch screen terminal, pull out keyboard. Kinda cute, esp by 1985 standards. DOES include intro/training cartridge, KB stand, cords, etc. Seems to have a parallel port socket, of all things. Be even cuter if I knew what to do with it. It does light up with application of 110v. Unknown what the trouble is, could be minor, could be a doorstop. Lacking a System 85, or even a Merlin, I have no particular use for it even in running condition. (I gonna donate to my office for their sys85 :^) ) Suggestions, Buyer addresses, direct offers, etc, welcome. Donation to a worthy telecom student or non-profit org considered, if they think they can repair/use it. e-mail, plz, Pat doesn't need the traffic. Standard disclaimer- this has NOTHING to do with my agency. ameijers@drms.dla.mil Andy Meijers DRMS-ZS | PHONE:{FTS 552, DSN 932, COMM (616) 961} -7253 Defense Reutilization & | UUCP:{uunet!gould!}dsac!dlscg1!s9d3002 Marketing Service | INTERNET: s9d3002@drms.dla.mil Battle Creek,MI 49017-3092 | <<<< STANDARD DISCLAIMERS APPLY !!! >>>> ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1993 12:25:58 -0700 (MST) From: Walt Moody Subject: Positions Available at the University of Arizona The University of Arizona is accepting applications for the following two management positions in the Center for Computing and Information Technology - University Telecommunications: COMPUTING MANAGER, PRINCIPAL (CUSTOMER SERVICE) Manage Customer Service which obtains/translates telecommunications requirements into solutions. Provides information through the campus switchboard, newsletter articles, training classes. COMPUTING MANAGER, PRINCIPAL (FACILITIES) Manage Facilities which includes planning, design engineering, installation, maintenance, operational integrity of the telephone/data communications systems including 5ESS switch, Ethernet, 10 Base T, Network Control Center, cable plant. PREFERRED QUALIFICATIONS: Bachelors degree in related field plus eight years experience in telecommunications, including three years of management experience (Both positions) Customer Service: Extensive knowledge, experience in telephone switching systems, data network capability and functionality, voice processing technology, and telecommunications management information systems. Strong planning, team building and interpersonal skills. Training experience helpful. Facilities: Extensive training and experience in data and telephone communications system analysis, design, operation and maintenance, inventory management, voice processing systems and telecommunications management information systems. Proficient with personal computers and software. (Both Positions) MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Bachelor's degree in Computer Science or Management Information Systems AND eight years of computing related experience which includes four year directly related experience and three years of supervisory experience; OR, Ten years of computing related experience which includes four years directly related experience and three years of supervisory experience. Starting Salary Range: $35,102 - $54,548 annually (Both positions). A UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA APPLICATION IS REQUIRED and should be mailed to address below. In addition, a letter of interest, resume, and three refererences to: Paula Loendorf, Telecommunications, Building 73, Tucson, AZ 85721. Closing Date: Sept. 1, 1993. Employment Services 1717 E. Speedway Tucson, Arizona 85719 (602) 621-3660 T D D (602) 621-8298 The University of Arizona is an Equal Employment/Affirmative Action Employer ------------------------------ From: gnelson@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Gregory J. Nelson) Subject: Wiring/Schematics/Info on Merlin? Date: 13 Aug 93 14:00:09 GMT Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. I was wondering if anyone out there knows the wiring pattern (i.e. what each of the eight wires is for) on a Merlin phone system. AT&T seems loathe to part with this info. A copy of a schematic/ technical manual would be invaluable. I would be very grateful for any info or pointers to info. I am the Chief Engineer of a small radio station and we need to make some ... er ... modifications for broadcast use. Thanks for any/all help! Gregory J. Nelson gnelson@gandalf.rutgers.edu ------------------------------ Date: 13 Aug 1993 16:23:16 EDT From: Hinders, Thomas Subject: New Jersey Pulls the Plug on Computer-Dialed Calls TRENTON, N.J. (Aug. 13) UPI - New Jersey has pulled the plug on computer-dialed phone sales. Under a new law, those who use automatic-dialing equipment to deliver totally recorded sales messages face fines of $500 to $800. Tom Hinders/Soft-Switch +1 215 640 7487 (v/vm) +1 215 640 7511 (f) Internet: thinder@SSW.COM X.400: C=US A=Telemail P=Softswitch S=Hinders G=Thomas ------------------------------ Subject: Caller ID Box With Serial Port From AT&T From: cmptech!rkroll@csn.org (Russell Kroll) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 22:14:17 MDT Organization: Computech BBS at 719.260.6279 - Colorado Springs, CO I heard some time ago that AT&T had a device called the "ClassMate 10", which was a Caller-ID box with a serial port on it (no LCD). However, when I tried to find out about what one was at the local AT&T phone store, they had no idea what I was talking about. I called 800-555-1212 and asked for the consumer products (or similar) division os AT&T to see if they knew anything about it. Unfortunately, they couldn't give me a number that corresponded to a division of that nature. So, I'd like the beef on these things. Do they really exist, and if so, who should I call at ATT to get the ball rolling? US West should have CID delivery here by September 14th (provided they don't treat that like other things here at the house), so I'd like to get this box soon. In case anyone's interested, I'm going to hook this box up to one of my machines and read the incoming data for verification purposes on the BBS. rkroll%cmptech.uucp@csn.org (Russell Kroll) - or - cmptech!rkroll@csn.org This came from Computech BBS .... +1 719.260.6279 in Colorado Springs, CO. ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #572 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa10942; 14 Aug 93 18:40 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA14810 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Sat, 14 Aug 1993 16:30:36 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA03892 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Sat, 14 Aug 1993 16:29:59 -0500 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 16:29:59 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308142129.AA03892@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@delta.eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #573 TELECOM Digest Sat, 14 Aug 93 12:12:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 573 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Leftover Drops (Leonard Erickson) Re: Leftover Drops (Dave Carpentier) Re: Leftover Drops (Sean Slattery) Re: Leftover Drops (Gary Breuckman) Re: Cannot Share T1? (Curtis Sanford) Re: Cannot Share T1? (John Kennedy) Re: Cannot Share T1? (Barton Bruce) Re: Cannot Share T1? (Steven L. Spak) Re: Bell Atlantic Mobile Cell Features (Lee Sweet) Re: Pay-Phone Wanted -- Where to Get? (Michael G. Katzmann) Re: Victory For 900 Users: FTC Rules Announced (Robert L. Ullmann) Re: Free French Phone Information From Publiphone (Alan Phipps) Re: Inter-LATA Caller*ID Arrives in NJ (Terry Kennedy) Re: *69 as Caler-ID (Dave Niebuhr) Re: ANAC Codes by NPA (Dave Niebuhr) Re: Flooding in the Midwest (Robert Bonomi) Re: What Are the Cable Differences? (Steven L. Spak) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 01:53:29 PDT From: Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org (Leonard Erickson) Subject: Re: Leftover Drops In V13 # 562, Alan Boritz is rather positive that the demarc is inside the tenant's space. I seriously doubt that this is correct, unless it is some odd law in his state. For example, according to this, I have *three* demarcs in my apartment. That's how many jacks I have. The wiring runs all the way to the box in the complex's laundry room. My inquiries have resulted in the information that the demarc is that box in the laundry room, and that the landlord is responsible for the wiring unless *I* subscribe to the wire backup plan (and this is not just from people who want to sell me the plan. So I am curious as to what Mr. Boritz's *source* for his statements is? uucp: uunet!m2xenix!puddle!51!Leonard.Erickson Internet: Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org ------------------------------ From: dave.carpentier@oln.com Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 09:49:34 -0400 Subject: Re: Leftover Drops Moderator notes: > want to tell me to check my instruments? I told her if I had to go > outside to see the man on the pole myself I would break his fingers so > he would never be able to work on telephone wires again in his life! :) > I guess they told him, because a couple minutes later I picked up > my second line and heard him talking to somebody in the office about > trying to get a good pair 'somewhere'. A long time ago I had a line Geeze, Pat, remind me not to move to your town for tel work! Unfortunately, some people take instructions to the letter. That I&R man up your pole may have been told that "the line on binding post 5 is spare" and, believing this was true, pulled your dropwire off. There could be dozens of reasons why the information turned out false, but regardless, he should have checked for dial tone first. Odds are, your line wouldn't have been dead for too long anyway because the fellow on the CO frame would have noticed the jumper on your pair on the MDF, and he would have told the I&R guy. Happy 12th! ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 12:34 GMT From: Sean Slattery Subject: Re: Leftover Drops Comments on NET customer service: A while ago I called New England Telephone and asked them for a list of all of our phone numbers, there were about sixteen. I found only fifteen dialtones at the demarc. It seems that the installer had assumed that all of the pairs that went to the pole in our parking lot were carried on to the demarc. According to NET that line had been installed FIVE years ago (before I was telecom manager)! I called customer service, explained what happened and had a 1,000 dollar credit applied to my bill that month! I am currently experiencing low volume (as in db, not use) on all of our lines. It seems that Watertown, MA. used to be serviced by the Newton CO and that some of the pairs here may still terminate at both the Watertown and Newton switches. This is sort of the inverse of leftover drops, one pair connecting to more that one CO. I have been working with a transmission engineer and he has been keeping me informed at each step of the way, he calls ME periodically and gives me status updates. All and all the service I have received from New England Telephone has been nothing short of amazing! If there are any NET people out there, thanks !! Sean Slattery | Airflow Research | vonslatt@MCImail.com Network Admin | Opinions expressed ARE those of my employer | in this instance. ------------------------------ From: puma@netcom.com (Gary Breuckman) Subject: Re: Leftover Drops Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 13:33:53 GMT In article rgt@spitfire.lanl.gov (Richard Thomsen) writes: > In an article about "multiple plant" in urban areas, Pat says: >> None of those big old wooden cabinets have locks on them; you just >> lift the wooden front up and out of the way. Most people do not even >> realize that between themselves and the CO may be five or six places >> the pair can be jumped -- just look in the basement of the building >> down the street. I should start a school and teach the general public >> about their phone service. Bell would hate me for it. :) PAT] > Most of us poor fools are at the mercy of the telephone company. I > keep hearing stories of people getting fraudulent calls on their > bills, and TPC says "It must be your call, as it is your wire." Is > there any definitive evidence that someone can post or something to > help us fight fraudulent calls on telephone bills? Something to take > to the PUC or court or whatever, so that when TPC uses its "direct > wire" argument, it can be countered? > Of course, I suppose this "evidence" can be used to fraudulently get > out of paying for legitimate calls, so it could work both ways. I > have no answers, but do have sympathy for the innocent party on either > side. An organization that I belong to has a line with an answering machine that is used as a 'hotline' for announcements and information. There is only an answering machine, no instrument. For years we have been getting bills with '0 local calls,' and then one month there were two local calls on the bill. The person who has this equipment in his house and handles the bills raised a fuss with Wisconsin Bell over that whole 12 cents. Despite the past record and having no telephone on the line, WI Bell insisted on printing a call detail sheet on those two calls, mailing it to him with a return card, and having him look at the numbers dialed to see if he 'recognized' them before they would give him a credit. What a waste of time and money (on BOTH their parts). puma@netcom.com ------------------------------ From: sanford@ascend.com (Curtis Sanford) Subject: Re: Cannot Share T1? Date: 14 Aug 93 15:46:13 GMT Organization: Ascend Communications, Alameda CA In article ellesson@vnet.IBM.COM writes: > I have been told that SW Bell will not allow a T1 line to be shared > across both public switched access and private line services. That > is, I am told that they will not permit you to subscribe to one T1 > line with, say, 14 channels for dialup POTS service from the local CO > switch, and the other 10 dedicated to leased line service for data. > Does anyone know why a telco would not consider this to be a > reasonable service to offer? (Especially since these services are Most RBOC's are unable to offer this service because there is no tariff filed with their regulatory authority permitting it. The InterExchange Carrers (IEC's) typically do offer this. For example ATT calls this SINA3. ------------------------------ From: warlock@CSUChico.EDU (John Kennedy) Subject: Re: Cannot Share T1? Date: 14 Aug 1993 17:19:09 GMT Organization: California State University, Chico In article , wrote: > I have been told that SW Bell will not allow a T1 line to be shared > across both public switched access and private line services. ... > Does anyone know why a telco would not consider this to be a > reasonable service to offer? ... I'm not the T1 tech, it's been filtered through two people, and nobody seemed really knowledgeable, so don't look for specifics in this answer. (: We recently tried to use some spare channels off of a "voice" T1 for "data" (really ~half of a T1 for SprintLink). Everyone thought it would be fine until it eventually tripped someone up at the local switch. In this case, "voice" and "data" are what _we_ are using the line for (POTS or ISDN lines vs. eventual serial lines into a Cisco router). I've given up trying to use appropriate jargon with our Pac*Bell guy down here. (:{ Apparently, at least the way we're set up, ALL of our T1 is going through their switch, even though all the channels aren't in use, and they won't or are unwilling make an exception. The data channels apparently won't like going through the switch at all for unexplained reasons. Multiple T1's wouldn't be a problem because some could be run through the switch and others wouldn't be required to. ------------------------------ From: Barton.Bruce@camb.com Subject: Re: Cannot Share T1? Date: 14 Aug 93 03:45:35 -0400 Organization: DECUServe In article , ellesson@vnet.IBM.COM writes: > I have been told that SW Bell will not allow a T1 line to be shared > across both public switched access and private line services. That > is, I am told that they will not permit you to subscribe to one T1 > line with, say, 14 channels for dialup POTS service from the local CO > switch, and the other 10 dedicated to leased line service for data. Typically not every CO has a DACS. Here in the Eastern Mass LATA there are only a dozen or so DACSes peppered about so no CO is very far from one. Try to even get the mix of trunks you want on one T1. DID trunks are from the TRUNK side of the switch. POTS 1MB like lines are from the LINE side and you can't get both on the same T1. You CAN order NRS (Network Reconfig Service) where you get to diddle with YOUR DS0s going through THEIR DACS. Probably not everything you might want to switch through the DACS is tariffed for NRS support, but with special assembly you probably *could* get everything there. You would have a full T1 for DID trunks, a full one for POTS trunks, maybe just DS0s for DDS lines, and a full T1 going into YOU. You would have $PAID$ to get each one of these hauled to the DACS and connected MONTHLY. You could then populate the T1 to you as you please. The real world is forget it until co-located bypass carriers and alternate dialtone providers are well entrenched in your state. They will be 1) demanding telco be more reasonable and accomodating, and 2) will have their OWN DACSes and #5ESSes to help you get what you want. Only then will telco repent. Were bypass carriers getting T1 to you at as low a price as they *could*, you would not bother packing each full. And when telco wakes up to THAT problem maybe you won't be using any of their services, anyway. ------------------------------ From: sspak@seas.gwu.edu (Steven L. Spak) Subject: Re: Cannot Share T1? Organization: George Washington University Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 11:25:06 GMT Most telcos will allow you to place voice and data on a "digital" hicap (DS1). Yes, all DS1s are digital; however, these hicaps are slightly more expensive for the user since they have Stratum 1 traceable network timing. They also usually interface a DACS (no reference to AT&T intended :-) ) which allows for electronic grooming. Steven Spak sspak@seas.gwu.edu Transmission Engineer Tel: (202)392-1611 Fax:(202)392-1261 ------------------------------ From: decrsc!leesweet@uunet.UU.NET (Lee Sweet) Subject: Re: Bell Atlantic Mobile Cell Features Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 03:51:26 -0400 (EDT) One correction, I believe ... the latest bill has a flyer that implies that follow-me roaming is now *automatic* for BAM customers. It says you can disable this, but not permanently ... i.e., like the way follow-me used to be, you have to enable it (then) or disable it (now) daily. Anyone have more details/experience with this? Seems like it would have to be permanently-disable-able, like call-waiting and three-way calling. (These are an extra monthly charge [automatically applied to your bill!] if you didn't/don't call BAM and say "don't want it!".) Lee Sweet Internet *lists* - leesweet@datatel.com Chief Systems Consultant Internet *e-mail* - lee@datatel.com Datatel, Inc. Phone - 703-968-4661 4375 Fair Lakes Court FAX - 703-968-4625 Fairfax, VA 22033 (Opinions are my own, and only my own!) ------------------------------ From: slc1!vk2bea!michael@uunet.UU.NET (Michael G. Katzmann) Subject: Re: Pay-Phone Wanted -- Where to Get? Date: 14 Aug 93 12:23:37 GMT Reply-To: slc1!vk2bea!michael@uunet.UU.NET (Michael G. Katzmann) Organization: Broadcast Sports Technology, Crofton. Maryland. In article hudel@waterloo.hp.com (Christopher Hudel) writes: > I'd like to put one of those old (or not so old) pay-phones in my > apartment as a "novelty" item and wonder if anybody knows where I can > pick one up and approximately how much I should expect to pay. I picked up an unused COCOT (WECO housing / Elcotel electronics) at a hamfest for $100. (I think they normally go for around $1000) M H Z Electronics in Phoenix, which is a second hand electronics outlet had some GTE phone co (dumb) and WECO wall mount (like at the airport) phone co phones, when I was there last. Might be worth a call. Michael Katzmann Broadcast Sports Technology Inc. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Crofton, Maryland. U.S.A NV3Z / VK2BEA / G4NYV michael@vk2bea.UUCP ------------------------------ From: ariel@world.std.com (Robert L Ullmann) Subject: Re: Victory For 900 Users: FTC Rules Announced Organization: The World in Boston Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 02:04:27 GMT Re UUNET's 900 service at US$0.50/minute (as quoted by one person): you can subscribe to world for US$5/month + US$2/hour, or US$20/month for 20 hours + US$1/hour, and then you can access _any_ Internet archive (including UUNET's) at the LD rate for your area to the NYNEX-east-MA LATA. Call +1 617 739 9753 or telnet world.std.com. Much more better. Robert Ullmann Ariel@World.STD.COM +1 617 247 7959 ------------------------------ From: aphipps@missing.com (Alan Phipps) Subject: Re: Free French Phone Information From Publiphone Date: 14 Aug 93 16:36:51 GMT Organization: The Missing Link BBS, Santa Maria, CA 805-925-1129 Yes, I am also aware of Minitel, out here in Santa Maria, California, USA. While on a Paris BBS a while back, I downloaded an IBM emuation of Minitel, and enables you to log onto the service via your IBM. The Minitel Emulator is very well designed and iconified. I'm looking, right now, for a Minitel access number in France. Can you help me out? Thanks, Alan Phipps 1@1805014 VirtualNet aphipps@missing.com (Alan Phipps) The Missing Link BBS, Santa Maria, CA 805-925-1129 ------------------------------ From: Terry Kennedy Subject: Re: Inter-LATA Caller*ID Arrives in NJ Organization: St. Peter's College, US Date: 14 Aug 93 02:54:31 EDT Organization: St. Peter's College, US In article , pdg@access.digex.net (Paul Guthrie) writes: > This information, while normally available in the IXCs network because > of CCS, is not transfered to the terminating operating company simply > because the IXC has no incentive to, not because of any technical > restrictions. Actually, I think it's actually "... because they have an incentive not to.". IXC's pay the local phone company some per-minute fee (usually between four and five cents per minute) for the "service" of the local phone company carrying the call to the subscriber. The IXC's claim that the local operating company would sell the Caller ID data (as part of the Caller ID service, Return Call, etc.) and thus the IXC should be compensated for providing the data (presumably by a reduction in the termination fee). The disagreement is over exactly what this data is "worth" to both parties. > Bellcore is currently soliciting stakeholders from > interested parties to petition the FCC to force the IXCs to provide > this information to the terminating operating companies. I agree that this is probably the only way this is going to get worked out. Of course, subscribers with large numbers of terminating calls can already bypass the local operating company and get the calls delivered via T1. The IXC normally passes all or part of the savings on to the customer (as reduced rates for incoming 800 calls, etc.). It would be interesting to see if anyone has been able to get Caller ID delivery from an IXC via this method. Terry Kennedy Operations Manager, Academic Computing terry@spcvxa.bitnet St. Peter's College, Jersey City, NJ USA terry@spcvxa.spc.edu +1 201 915 9381 ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 06:18:30 EDT From: dwn@dwn.ccd.bnl.gov (Dave Niebuhr) Subject: Re: *69 as Caller-ID In TELECOM Digest, Vol. 13, Issue #563 From: hansen@inference.com (Rob Hansen) writes: > I do not have Call*Return. My question is this: If I call "John Doe" > who uses Call*Return on me, will the system read my number back to > him? Assuming it won't and isn't allowed to, what happens if I'm far > enough away from John that I the call costs him money? Will my number > show up on his phone bill? If it will, isn't this a violation of the > rules? In New York, yes it will if it was a call that would carry a charge. The number won't be read back to him but will show up on the phone bill. It isn't against the rules in New York for this scenario to take place. Also, if the person to whom you are doing a Call Return has blocking enabled either per-line or per-call, his number will still show up. That was a big hassle out here not too long ago. Dave Niebuhr Internet: niebuhr@bnl.gov / Bitnet: niebuhr@bnl Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, LI, NY 11973 (516)-282-3093 Senior Technical Specialist: Scientific Computer Facility ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 06:51:57 EDT From: dwn@dwn.ccd.bnl.gov (Dave Niebuhr) Subject: Re: ANAC Codes by NPA In TELECOM Digest V13 #569 LESREEVES@delphi.com writes: > Area Code / ANAC # to dial Area Code / ANAC # to dial > 201 / 958 205 / 908-222-2222 ^^^ Huh? If memory serves me 908 is an area code in New Jersey. I know that 205 is splitting to 334, but there must be some reason for having to dial the 908 number for ANAC. > 401 / 222-2222 403 / 908-222-2222 ^^^ West Virginia has to call New Jersey also? > 604 / 1116 604 / 116 How are these not being trapped as being international calls? > 604 / 1211 604 / 211 Ditto: > 812 / 410-555-1212 815 / 200-xxx-xxxx So in 812-land, a person calls information in Maryland to get the ANAC? > 914 / 1-990-1111 914 / 99 ^^ There must be some sort of a timeout on this. Dave Niebuhr Internet: niebuhr@bnl.gov / Bitnet: niebuhr@bnl Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, LI, NY 11973 (516)-282-3093 Senior Technical Specialist: Scientific Computer Facility [Moderator's Note: I am not necessarily vouching for the information given in his article, but I think there is some confusion in your mind regards area codes and local dialing codes which *look like* area codes. For example, dialing 908 or 410 is not going to produce the same results as dialing 1-908 or 1-410 plus something. The '1' on the front makes the difference. International calls being with 01 or 011, not 11x as cited in the above examples, therefore, no confusion would result in dialing. As a further example, what would appear to be area code '571' (if/when such a thing comes around) -- ie, dialed 1-571 -- is used for ringback here in Chicago, ie 1-571-your last four. Yet there are working numbers in the 571 exchange as well. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 06:02:57 -0500 From: Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: Flooding in the Midwest From converesations the end of last week. The Racoon River at Des Moines, is back in its banks, and the Des Moines River is 'almost' so. *Lots* of mess remaining to be cleaned up; practically all the -grass- in those areas that spent significant time underwater is gone (drowned, i guess) -- dust/erosion to worry about after it dries out, oh joy. I don't if tap water is safe to drink yet. Robert Bonomi bonomi@delta.eecs.nwu.edu [Moderator's Note: Someone else wrote to mention that a lot of the phone demarcs on the sides of people's houses, etc were absolutely corroded beyond repair or cleanup. Amazingly as the wires begin to dry out, the phones *are* working, but it is a lot like our scene here last year when the Chicago River filled up many basements downtown putting lots of the big terminal boxes in building basements under water: the cross-talk has to be heard to be believed. Static; a half- dozen voices faintly in the background as you try to make your call; all kinds of goodies. Here, most of the tags on jumpers which desc- ribed which wires went where were made illegible by the water, so notes that in some cases had been written 30 or 40 years earlier by telephone men long since departed ('this 50-pair goes to the answer- ing service at ') left cleanup/fix-up crews scratching their head and hoping for the best. Look at some of the 'multiple plant' in the older big buildings downtown here under good conditions and try to figure it out ... then do it when the writing on the little paper tags tied onto the wires with string has been faded away. Telco outside plant records here, to be charitable, leave something to be desired as do underground utility records in general. When they were trying to drain out the basements here, they decided to excavate in Randolph Street just west of the river, only to find there were all sorts of telco cables and other stuff there *they had not known about* prior which were likely to be damaged if they continued digging there! Good luck in Des Moines and other areas along the Mississippi getting utility service restored to a pre-flood level of operation. PAT] ------------------------------ From: sspak@seas.gwu.edu (Steven L. Spak) Subject: Re: What Are the Cable Differences? Organization: George Washington University Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 11:42:35 GMT POTS, ADSL, HDSL are all the same cable - 24 or 26 gauge copper. It may have load coils to balance out the natural capacitive effects. It may have bridge tap sections which are "hanging" off the main run where previous customers may have lived. T1 cable (true digital T1, not QAM, CAP, or DMT) is on NON-loaded cable with bridge tap removed. Any junk on the cable causes reflections and poor response. Steven Spak sspak@seas.gwu.edu Transmission Engineer Tel: (202) 392-1611 Fax: (202) 392-1261 ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #573 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa11098; 14 Aug 93 19:14 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA12351 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Sat, 14 Aug 1993 17:04:18 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA19344 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Sat, 14 Aug 1993 17:04:02 -0500 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 17:04:02 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308142204.AA19344@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@delta.eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #574 TELECOM Digest Sat, 14 Aug 93 14:52:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 574 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Analysis of Bell Atlantic Cellular (Steve Forrette) Re: Analysis of Bell Atlantic Cellular (Michael D. Sullivan) Re: Chicago Post Office, Mail Drops, etc. (Steve Forrette) Re: Chicago Post Office, Mail Drops, etc. (Jorn Barger) Re: Chicago Post Office, Mail Drops, etc. (Tim Schmitt) Re: Country Code Reverse List (Jim Rees) Re: Country Code Reverse List (Bob Goudreau) Re: Local Calls via LD Carrier? (Mike King) Re: Interesting 800 Number Response (Steve Forrette) Re: Central Office Tours? (Jim Rees) Re: Another Look at Alex Bell (Joshua Muskovitz) Re: Sprint Workers Fed Up, Start Unionizing (Brad Isley) Re: An Experience With the AT&T Language Line (Dinesh Rehani) Re: Is This Legal? (Randy Hayes) Re: Radar and Acronyms (Eric N. Florack) Re: Radar and Acronyms (Wilson Mohr) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: stevef@wrq.com (Steve Forrette) Subject: Re: Analysis of Bell Atlantic Cellular Date: 14 Aug 1993 11:03:28 GMT Organization: Walker Richer & Quinn, Inc. Reply-To: stevef@wrq.com (Steve Forrette) In cmoore@BRL.MIL (Carl Moore) writes: > Seven digits within the same area code; area code + seven digits if > calling a different area code; > Where is this being used from? What about time-outs or N0X/N1X > prefixes or the coming of NNX area codes? This works just fine for cellular phones, as there is never a need for a timeout, since the caller has to press SEND when they are done dialing. The cellular switch doesn't see the individual digits as they are dialed, but just the complete number when SEND is pressed. I remember a few years ago when cellular was new, one never needed to dial a 1 for a call, at least on the systems I used. It was just seven digits for intra-NPA, and ten digits for inter-NPA. Then, they started requiring a 1 so you could tell when a call had toll charges in addition to airtime charges. In fact, this is strictly interpreted by Cellular One of Seattle. You need seven digits for local, 1 + ten digits for toll (whether within area code 206 or not), but interestingly enough, 800 calls don't need a preceeding 1, since they are not "toll" long distance calls. Also, when roaming, you are always required to dial using the area code. For local calls while roaming, only ten digits are required. For toll calls while roaming, 1 + ten digits are required. Steve Forrette, stevef@wrq.com ------------------------------ From: avogadro@well.sf.ca.us (Michael D. Sullivan) Subject: Re: Analysis of Bell Atlantic Cellular Date: 14 Aug 93 08:28:21 GMT Organization: The Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link, Sausalito, CA In Carl Moore writes: > Where is this being used from? What about time-outs or N0X/N1X > prefixes or the coming of NNX area codes? We are talking about a cellular system. One inputs the entire number to one's phone, offline, then presses the "SEND" button. No time-outs. The switch knows whether you have sent 7, 8, 10, 11, or more digits, and there is no ambiguity, as there is with asynchronous transmission of digits to the central office with regular phones. Michael D. Sullivan <74160.1134@compuserve.com> ------------------------------ From: stevef@wrq.com (Steve Forrette) Subject: Re: Chicago Post Office, Mail Drops, etc. Date: 14 Aug 1993 21:38:32 GMT Organization: Walker Richer & Quinn, Inc. Reply-To: stevef@wrq.com (Steve Forrette) In telecom@eecs.nwu.edu (TELECOM Moderator) writes: [discussion of maildrop fraud deleted] > It doesn't matter to me, Jack. As you pointed out, if the fraud ceases > being petty, the heat gets put on the private agents by postal inspectors > and others. For further protection, credit card issuers and other credit > grantors attempt to verify applications sent to them and a criss-cross > directory will list a mail drop for what it is. Generally that throws > up a red flag for a credit grantor, at least in a big urban area like > Chicago. Looking in the criss-cross is not necessary. I use a private mail drop for all of my mail (and no, I'm not doing for fraudulent reasons :-)). The last time I looked at my TRW credit report, it of course had my current home address on it. I was surprised to note that it also said "not a residential address" right on the credit report. Apparently, the credit bureaus know based on the zoning at that address or some other method that the address given isn't really a residence. This could be because it's a mail drop, or perhaps just your work address. So, any entity that gets a copy of your credit report knows that your given address isn't "really" your address right away, without even have to do any special checking. It is interesting to me that I've never had any problems whatsoever with this being on my credit report -- not even a question about it from anyone. Steve Forrette, stevef@wrq.com [Moderator's Note: What happens is all things are taken in context to each other. If a person has a decent credit record, discrepancies in the address between the credit bureau and the credit application are overlooked. It is pretty well known that credit bureau files are not always perfect by any means; addresses will not always be up to date or previous addresses will be given as current addresses, etc. If a person has lousy credit, or no credit then shows up with a drop address it makes a difference, etc. Creditors have to make educated guesses based on prior experience both with the individual and with the address involved. If a credit report comes out looking 'too good' many creditors will spend a few extra minutes on it also just to insure it is not a fraud submitted by someone who got ahold of your bureau illegally. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 13:10 CDT From: jorn@genesis.mcs.com (Jorn Barger) Subject: Re: Chicago Post Office, Mail Drops, etc. Organization: MCSNet Subscriber, Chicago, IL I got a PO Box at 60681 (Amoco Bldg) in 1987. I've had two instances of people telling me they sent things, that never got to me. I've had my box closed and mail returned because they didn't give me the renewal notice. I've had packages returned in error. Last fall the entire workforce there was replaced for bad performance. (i ***hate*** monopolies!!! ;^) ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 08:44:36 -0700 From: tims@sierra.com (Tim Schmitt) Subject: Re: Chicago Post Office, Mail Drops, etc. Our Esteemed Moderator writes: > At least after I sued First National Bank in Small Claims Court several > years ago I got the pleasure of seeing them fire half their mail room > and remittance processing clerks -- 18 people -- in one day who were > caught stealing money after a two week investigation. Sounds like there's an interesting story behind this one. Can you share it? UUCP:uunet!sgihbtn!tims * "The time has come," the Walrus said, "to ARPA:sgihbtn!tims * speak of other things. Of shoes and @uunet.uu.net * ships and sealing wax, of cabbages and * Kings... and why the sea is boiling hot, * and whether pigs have wings. * -Lewis Carroll [Moderator's Note: I thought the way that went was 'The time has come the walrus said / to speak of many things / of shoes and ships and sealing wax / and if the Moderator has wings ... :). There is an interesting story; I started it the other day but never finished it so I will try to work on it this weekend sometime. PAT] ------------------------------ From: Jim.Rees@umich.edu Subject: Re: Country Code Reverse List Date: 14 Aug 1993 12:39:57 GMT Organization: University of Michigan CITI In article , Proctor & Associates <0003991080@mcimail.com> writes: > Sometimes I get a fax from overseas and there is no clue as to where > it is from. I decided I needed a reverse list of country codes in > numerical order... You left out the United States! Our country code is 1. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 11:58:40 -0400 From: goudreau@dg-rtp.dg.com (Bob Goudreau) Subject: Re: Country Code Reverse List Paul Cook writes: > Sometimes I get a fax from overseas and there is no clue as to where > it is from. I decided I needed a reverse list of country codes in > numerical order, after I wearied of paging through the AT&T > International Telecommunications Guide. > Here is one that I just sorted. If there isn't one already in the > Telecom Archives, maybe this could go there. Well, fortunately, the Archives do already contain a reverse list (including area code information within many countries). In any case, the mysterious faxed list has some interesting errors: > Country Country > Code > 7 Lithuania (C.I.S.) > 7 Moldova (C.I.S.) > 372 Estonia (C.I.S.) > 374 Latvia (C.I.S.) I could see them missing all four of the new 37x country codes, but how they managed to miss just half of them is beyond me. All four of those countries got 37x codes at the same time. Also, the three Baltic nations have never been members of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Bob Goudreau Data General Corporation goudreau@dg-rtp.dg.com 62 Alexander Drive +1 919 248 6231 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 12:32:03 EDT From: mking@fsd.com (Mike King) Subject: Re: Local Calls via LD Carrier? In TELECOM Digest, V13 #570, dold@unislc.slc.unisys.com (Clarence Dold) wrote: > Assuming you are properly registered with the carrier, which is > certainly true if you have selected them as your equal access LD > carrier, you can force intra-lata calls to be carried by them, rather > than your default regional carrier, by pressing the access code prior > to placing any (all) phone call. 503-555-1212 would be routed to your > selected LD carrier, 525-1212 would probably be handled by your local > carrier. 10288-525-1212 would force the call to be passed to AT&T for > handling, rahter than allowing your local carrier to decide whether to > handle or pass. While every phone company processes calls differently, where intra-LATA competition is allowed, I've always seen the phone company will take the intra-LATA call for themselves unless the 10xxx code is dialed; even if the number is preceeded by 1 or 1 + NPA, the phone company still takes the call. In those cases, "1+ carrier" still seems to mean "inter-LATA 1+ carrier." If by "registered" you mean "subscribed," not all carriers require you to be presubscribed to be able to send calls through their network. None of the big three require presubscription, and I have two letters from resellers with their own 10xxx codes who specifically invite me to place my intra-LATA calls over their networks WITHOUT subscribing for regular 1+ service. I haven't heard an update, but I understand part of the push to allow intra-LATA competition in California was the ability to choose a default 1+ carrier for intra-LATA calls in addition to the inter-LATA default carrier. Mike King * Software Sourcerer * Fairchild Space * +1 301.428.5384 mking@fsd.com or 73710.1430@compuserve.com * (usual disclaimers) [Moderator's Note: And of course some local telcos are under no ob- ligation to pass out intra-LATA stuff and they don't; they ignore 10xxx totally unless it is outside their LATA. PAT] ------------------------------ From: stevef@wrq.com (Steve Forrette) Subject: Re: Interesting 800 Number Response Date: 14 Aug 1993 21:51:38 GMT Organization: Walker Richer & Quinn, Inc. Reply-To: stevef@wrq.com (Steve Forrette) In cambler@cymbal.calpoly.edu (Chris Ambler) writes: > I just called an 800 number for an electronics supplier. After one > ring, I got, "Thank you for calling. Our office is now closed. Please > call back during normal business hours" ... and then after about 10 > seconds (I noticed that it did not disconnect me, so I hung on to see > what would happen) I got, "We're sorry, your call could not be > completed. 213-xxx" ... the first message, interestingly enough, was > the same female voice that seems to do all of the "Thank you for > calling Pacific Bell" recordings when you call the phone*company here. I would say that the place you called did indeed disconnect. If they are using a digital switch, digital connection to the IXC, then it is quite likely that you would not hear anything when they disconnected. When the called party disconnects, the local telco will hold the line silent for a few seconds, then return an intercept recording like the one you got. Note that it used to be common practice to return a local dialtone to the caller at this point, but this does not happen much anymore for fraud prevention reasons. Anybody who has some sort of toll restriction device on the line (such as a COCOT, PBX, or toll restrictor) is very thankful that the telco does this - otherwise it would be easy for a caller to get a "fresh" dialtone that the restrictor doesn't know about thus enabling the caller to call anywhere. Steve Forrette, stevef@wrq.com ------------------------------ From: Jim.Rees@umich.edu Subject: Re: Central Office Tours? Date: 14 Aug 1993 14:12:12 GMT Organization: University of Michigan CITI In article , co057@cleveland.Freenet. Edu (Steven H. Lichter) writes: > Yes the step equipment was a lot more interesting. We had mockups of > switch trains that would let the tours see how the calls went through, There is still a working step-by-step demo switch train in the telephone museum in Atlanta, Georgia. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 10:17:42 EDT From: Joshua E. Muskovitz Subject: Re: Another Look at Alex Bell The role of Alex Bell in the deaf/Deaf culture is extremely well documented in my wife's thesis/book, Education and Ideology -- A Study of Deaf Education in America. If you are interested, she has a few copies left. You can write to her directly ... she is Marli Mills, marli@mcimail.com. josh ------------------------------ From: brad@slammer.atl.ga.us (Brad Isley) Subject: Re: Sprint Workers Fed Up, Start Unionizing Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 15:00:36 GMT In article ndallen@io.org (Nigel Allen) writes: > Sprint requires its telemarketers, mostly women, to stay on the > phone for precisely 6.7 hours a day and talk with each customer for > exactly 150-210 seconds. A telemarketer has 10 seconds -- no more, no > less -- between calls and must make a sale every 3.5 minutes. Sounds like BellSouth. > If a worker arrives a few minutes late or leaves a few minutes > early six times in a year, she or he is fired. Flexibility for > emergencies or child care problems? Not at Sprint. Sounds like BellSouth. > Supervisors eavesdrop electronically on Sprint workers and impose > unrealistically high work standards and constant work speed-ups, > causing employee burnout and high turnover. Each year, 25% of Sprint > operators quit their jobs. Sounds like BellSouth. brad@slammer.atl.ga.us (Brad Isley) +1 404 925-9663(H) 493-2484(W) [Moderator's Note: Sounds like a lot of telcos. And without realizing it you may have answered the question 'is a union a good thing or not for telco workers'. BellSouth is heavily unionized as are all the BOCs, yet based on what you seem to be saying, the workers might as well have saved all their union dues and bought something else with the money instead. :( Labor unions in America are a long and complex issue not really suited for this Digest, but the fact that much of the industry operates the way it does today as a result of unions (or lack of them) in the workplace cannot be overlooked in discussions here of service tendered and the prices paid for it, etc. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 15:33:50 GMT From: rehani@utcdsv.SINet.SLB.COM (Dinesh Rehani) Subject: Re: An Experience With the AT&T Language Line >> Several weeks ago I phoned the AT&T Language Line and asked for some >> details about their service. The marketing rep told me about their >> 140 languages available 24 hours/day, and offered to mail me some > ^^^ > Does anybody have a list of those available? 140 languages sounds like > a lot to cover the globe ... I mean, we're talking about business > languages here, aren't we? > Europe ... that still leaves a lot for Africa and Asia. Hmm. > Do we have readers in those parts of the world, who could comment? I agree with you, 140 seems like too large a number. I seriously doubt anyone could come up with 140 languages that AT&T would want to spend money on translating ... however, if they were going for the 'non-business' end of the market, 140 is much too small, I can tell you that. In India, where I come from, 15 languages are officially recognised by the state for legal paperwork (all 15 appear on banknotes). There's a couple of hundred more that are spoken by the people, aithough only about 30-50 of these would have a well defined grammar, literature, and distinctive script etc. Most of the rest would be spoken languages only. I have lived in Africa for some time, and if I had to guess at the number of languages spoken by people in Africa, I would hazard 200 to 500 ... (whether they would be technically classified as dialects and not languages is beyond me). dinesh (rehani@utcdsv.sinet.slb.com) ------------------------------ From: HayesR@uihc-telecomm-po.htc.uiowa.edu Date: 14 Aug 93 13:19 CST Subject: Re: Is This Legal? With regard to the Operator Services Act of 1990, those businesses or institutions deemed "aggregators" were required to allow 10XXX-0 calling via different scenarios: 1) Those who can do so by simply reprogramming their systems had to be compliant by March 16, 1992, 2) Those who can reprogram their systems for $15 per line were to do so by March 15, 1993, and 3) Those who have older systems and would have great difficulty complying as such were to comply by April 17, 1997 or upon installation of new equipment that would allow such service. The question also pertained to being able to block 10XXX-1+ dialing which would bill calls to the aggregator as opposed to 10XXX-0+ calling, which requires calls to be calling card, collect, or third-number billed. Although the issue of blocking 10XXX-1 + appears to be very simple, one has to think beyond 1+ to 011+ (international direct dialing via 10XXX). I believe many who thought they had correctly placed security restrictions on their systems when activating 10XXX calling were surprised with some direct dialed international calls. Thus, programming had to be carried out to 10XXX-XXX+ dialing to restrict direct dialed international. From all of the institutions mentioned, there may be clear compliance, non-compliance, or some may fall into number threea as mentioned above. Once the status is known, it is very easy to see if there is compliance or not. randal-hayes@uiowa.edu (Randy Hayes) ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 12:05:06 PDT From: Eric_N._Florack.cru-mc@xerox.com Subject: Re: Radar and Acronyms In your acronyms, nobody has mentioned that there were several radio stations that used their callsigns for such. This is kinda fun, so ... Around our area, here in ROchester, there were several 'unofficial' translations, too. WHAM = We Have A$$#0!es Managing. (True at that time) WVOR = We Violently Oppose Rodents. (A local Gadfly who was on a supposed anti-rat campaign suggested the station join them, because of the callsign. They never joined him, he was a bit of an idiot, but the name stuck among the stations alums.) WBBF= Weirdos, Bimbos, Bozos and Foul-ups. WWWG= What went Wrong, Guys? (Owner of the day bought the number one rated top 40 in town, and turned it into utter garbage in less than two books.) WRLX= We Really Like Xylophones. (They were an easy-listener) WROC= We're Rotten Old Coots WNYR= We're Not Young ... Really. (They did have an older staff than most.) WHEC= We Have Excellent Coverage (Not really true since they had the second lowest power output in town, and reception was dependant on wind direction, and phases of the moon, and how fast the pet mouse could run in the generator wheel.) WBEN= We'll Be Embalmed, Now. (Another EZ listener) WWBK= We're Wild Brockport Kids. (Brockport is a small town about 30 miles west of Rochester, and the station, being small-market, always hired kids from nearby State U at B.) WJBT= We Just Broke the Transmitter (Brockport, in it's later lives. The CE was known as SHORT-OUT. Never stayed running at full power for longer than a week. WCBA= We Can't Buy Anything. (Nearby station noted for it's tight budgets). WENY= The Weenie. (Somehow I could never brag about that name, ya know?) Then, of course the nighttime came, and we got stations from all over. WWWE in Ohio= What went wrong? Everything. (Pat: You'll like this:) WLS= What Lousy Shows! WCFL= We Can't Find Lujack In another situation, we had an FM EZL in town, that used an automation system. The first was called FRED. (Beeping Ridiculous Electronic Device) His replacement was ALFRED (Another Lousy Beeping Ridiculous Electonic Device). Their competition was also running an auto, which they named HERM, or Human/electronic replacement Machine. Speaking of WCFL, I was given info that made me concerned ... I recall little of it, but you being a native, Pat, perhaps you could say. I caught word that a few years ago, there was an FM on the outskirts of C-land, that started using the old call... WCFL. They were running something of an excess of power for their class-A designation, as I gather it. They were fined not once, but as I recall twice for the same infraction. Can you tell me whatever became of that station? [Moderator's Note: Sorry, I do not know what became of them. WCFL operating at 1000 AM was originally owned by the hicago ederation of abor. WLS (890) was originally owned by Sears, Roebuck; at the time the orld's argest tore. WGN (720) has always been owned by the {Chicago Tribune} which we all know is the orld's reatest ewspaper. At the time WLS switched formats from 'Prairie Farmer' and eighteen hours of brokered religious programs one after the other every half hour on Sunday to the hard rock music format they started in 1961, they got the nickname World's Lousiest Sation for a few years. WBBM (780) was started by a man named Charles Atlass in rural Illinois about 1910 when he was a teenage ham radio operator. He moved to Chicago in 1921 and applied for a license from the Federal Radio Commission for the call letters WBBM since e roadcast from the roadoor Hotel Ballroom; and indeed he did; with jazz music every evening in the early days, and talk shows interwoven with the music, interviewing the cream of society's crop; elegant, rich, white people who came to dance, eat and be entertained at this fine resort on the northern edge of the city. Now seventy years later, the Broadmoor Apartments is still there; a horrible slum building in a horrible high-crime neighborhood about a mile east of me on the lakefront. The 'ballroom' has been abandoned for forty years, and caught fire a couple times in the recent past as part of a dispute between drug dealers over who got the territory and who had to stay out. In 1971 or '72, WBBM had their fiftieth anniversary and did a remote from the Broadmoor Apartments for old time's sake. Two of the people on location there for the show got mugged by the neighborhood welcoming committee. Our local Evanston station used to be WEAW, named for the owner of the staton, Edward A. Wheeler. The call was changed to WOJO, but employees said that still referred to boss Wheeler, the ld ag ff. :) PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 15:06:22 CDT From: mohr@orange.rtsg.mot.com (Wilson Mohr) Subject: Re: Radar and Acronyms In comp.dcom.telecom otto@vaxb.acs.unt.edu wrote: > Since military technicians often became civilian technicians and > engineers, this tradition has carried forward in RTFM and RTFM-P > ("Read The F...ing Manual" and "Read The F...ing Manual - Please !") We have always gone by the sayings "Read the Factory Manuals" and "Read the Factory Manuals - Please!" Wilson Mohr mohr@rtsg.mot.com "ME speak for Motorola? No, I don't think so ..." ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #574 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa11734; 14 Aug 93 21:30 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA24525 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Sat, 14 Aug 1993 19:27:40 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA13632 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Sat, 14 Aug 1993 19:27:01 -0500 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 19:27:01 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308150027.AA13632@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #575 TELECOM Digest Sat, 14 Aug 93 19:27:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 575 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: The Information "Free"way (Mark Brader) Re: An Experience With the AT&T Language Line (Christian Weisgerber) Re: Country Code Reverse List (Paul Robinson) Re: Caller ID Box With Serial Port From AT&T (Macy Hallock) Re: ATT Truevoice (Kai Schlichting) Re: CPSR and the NII (Art Walker) Are we Being Ripped Off in New Zealand? (Jonathan Mosen) 7-bit Zmodem (Cliff Sharp) Wanted: Cellular Phone FAQ? (Nadeem Haider) AT&T System 75 (Ian Eisenberg) Emergency TDD to Use 311 (Curtis E. Reid) Who Runs 800 DA? (Gabe M. Wiener) List of Some IVR Vendors Available (Nadeem Haider) RFD: comp.dcom.telecom.tech (Ron Dippold) Administrivia: Another Break-In; Weekend Reading (TELECOM Moderator) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: msb@sq.sq.com (Mark Brader) Subject: Re: The Information "Free"way Organization: SoftQuad Inc., Toronto, Canada Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 20:43:33 GMT Robert M. Slade (roberts@decus.arc.ab.ca), in a copyrighted article, writes: > (I should, for those few non-Canadians on the mailing list, give a > brief resume of the case. Karla and Paul Bernardo have been charged > with the murders, sex related, of school aged girls. They are being > tried separately. Their marriage has apparently broken up. Paul > Bernardo legally changed his name to Paul Teale; Karla is being > referred to as Teale as well. Paul has not yet stood trial. Karla > has, has been convicted, and the judge imposed a publication ban on > the trial.) This is substantially correct as I understand matters, but some details need to be clarified. My reference for this article is the {Toronto Star} of July 6 and 7. First, Karla's surname was Homolka and has indeed been changed legally to Teale. I'm not sure whether she used Bernardo as well. I'll use given names in this article to duck the issue. Second, Karla was convicted of *manslaughter*, not murder. Manslaughter is unlawful killing without malice aforethought. One may speculate that either (a) she was shown to have participated unwillingly in the crimes, or (b) Karla took a secondary role in the crimes and the prosecution plea-bargained a guilty plea to a lesser offense in return for information already volunteered and/or future testimony against Paul. (The judge did say for publication that "her plea obviated a trial", which was no surprise from the timing of the proceedings, and that she had freely offered information. He also said that "She did not personally inflict the deaths", but to have done so is not a requirement for a murder conviction.) Third and most important, the publication ban is not permanent, but is effective only until Paul's case has been concluded one way or another, probably in a couple of years. (Consequently, whether either of the conjectures above is valid will no doubt become clear later.) The ban was imposed on the grounds that it was the only way to ensure a fair trial for Paul. (I find this surprising -- I would have thought it sufficient that the two prosecutions be combined into one case, particularly since they relate to the same crimes. But it was the prosecution that pushed for the ban, and that was the reason given. The judge said, "I believe the consideration of a fair trial outweighs the freedom of the press in these exceptional circumstances." The ban is being appealed on constitutional grounds.) Under the ban, attendance at Karla's case was limited to certain people with a direct interest in the case (such as family members of the victims and accused, and certain police officers) *and* to Canadian reporters, who are free to publish their articles when the ban ends. Of course, court officials must also have been present. Foreign reporters were excluded because of the possibility that they would publish while outside of Canadian jurisdiction. > From an article in the Vancouver Sun of August 3, 1993 (originally by > John Duncan and Nick Pront in the Toronto Star): "Computer information > networks free to the general public have been carrying chatter about > Karla Teale's manslaughter trial, including details that fall under > the judge's publication ban". It is perfectly legal to *speculate* about what may have happened, as I did above. It would also be legal to circulate *mis*information about the case, as long as issues such as fraud or libel did not apply. What would not be legal would be for someone who *was* in the group privileged to attend the case to (a) reveal that information either on a computer network or otherwise, or (b) confirm that someone's speculation was correct. Accordingly, even if the above statement is correct, no proof can legally be offered to support it. Now, if it said, "details that *purportedly* fall under the ... ban", that would be a wholly different matter. > I won't go into detail on the Sun article. Some of the text is > reasonable; some is incorrect. The important thing is the fact that > information banned from publication in the press is available on > computer networks and conferencing systems. See above. If Mr. Slade was present at the trial, he is in violation of the court order. If not, he is engaging in speculation as to what is or is not a "fact". > There is one other absolutely fascinating aspect: according to an > expert media lawyer quoted in the article the posters are probably not > breaking the law. Apparently the publication ban covers only material > obtained from the court. Publication of the same information, if > obtained from other sources, is permissible. Right -- because in that case the "information" is only speculation. This is fascinating? Mark Brader, SoftQuad Inc., Toronto, utzoo!sq!msb, msb@sq.com ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 01:54:34 +0200 From: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org (Christian Weisgerber) Reply-To: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org Subject: Re: An Experience With the AT&T Language Line In was written: > I believe India alone has over 100 mutually incomprehensible > languages. [...] Yes, I'm aware that large numbers of languages are spoken in the mentioned regions. However, those are not major languages. What languages would be considered suitable to conduct business in? Especially in Third World countries people that can afford telephone service are probably not stuck in remote areas with some obscure language as their only one. > ... and even the US has several dozen. Seriously, would you consider conducting a phone call to the U.S. in any language other than English or Spanish? Would you include Cherokee in a language line of yours? That's why I'm curious *which* 140 languages AT&T offers. Christian 'naddy' Weisgerber, Germany naddy@ruessel.sub.org ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 13:47:02 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM Subject: Re: Country Code Reverse List From: Paul Robinson Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA Proctor & Associates <0003991080@mcimail.com>, writes: > 53 Guantanamo Bay 53 is Cuba; 539 is 'Gitmo' (Actually, Guantamo Bay numbers start with 5399). You also missed two important countries: 1 United States 1 Canada > AC 809 Anguilla This and the other 22 countries should have been listed at '1809' North America north of Mexico all begins with '1'. Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 10:44 EDT From: macy@fmsys.fmsystm.ncoast.org (Macy Hallock) Subject: Re: Caller ID Box With Serial Port From AT&T Reply-To: macy@telemax.com Organization: F M Systems/Telemax Medina, Ohio USA In article is written: > I heard some time ago that AT&T had a device called the "ClassMate > 10", which was a Caller-ID box with a serial port on it (no LCD). > However, when I tried to find out about what one was at the local AT&T > phone store, they had no idea what I was talking about. Vodavi, an established telecom manfacturer owned by a very large Korean electronics company, seems to be serious about the Caller-ID market. They have come out with two Caller-ID stand alone boxes, one of which has a serial port for about $80. Since we do not have Caller-ID in Ohio (and worse yet, I live in GTE territory), I have been unable to test the unit myself. Others who have used it tell be its neat, but in short supply right now, as most distributors have ordered limited quantities. If anyone has trouble finding these and wants to try one, I will put you in touch with a distributor as a courtesy (I'll refrain from publishing the number on the net as a bow to non-commercialism.) Macy Hallock N8OBG Voice= +1.216.723.3030 Fax= +1.216.723.3223 macy@telemax.com Telemax Inc. and F M Systems Inc. 152 Highland Drive Medina, Ohio 44256 USA ------------------------------ From: acorn@info2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (Kai Schlichting) Subject: Re: ATT Truevoice Date: 14 Aug 1993 05:25:01 GMT Organization: Newsserver, Comp.Center (RUS), U of Stuttgart, FRG david.g.lewis (deej@cbnewsf.cb.att.com) wrote: > In article ken thompson donald.wichitaks.NCR.COM> writes: >> Will not high speed modems have trouble with this distored channel, >> switch to slower speeds automaticaly and maybe unknown to the user, >> and spend more time connected to get their data through? > No, because (a) as we've established (which I note CommWeek picked up > on a few weeks ago), the tone to disable echo control will disable > TrueVoice, and (b) the same bandwidth is available anyway. I was always curious about this: which is the tone to turn echo cancelling off? and further: what is the tone to turn it ON again,other than resetting the trunk? I would send that tone down the line on some international calls, where I get a bad echo, sometimes; would this work if I am the originator? Bye, Kai ------------------------------ From: walker@unomaha.edu (Art Walker) Subject: Re: CPSR and the NII Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Nebraska at Omaha Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 05:54:55 GMT mc/G=Brad/S=Hicks/OU=0205925@mhs.attmail.com wrote: > I submit that whatever the benefits of granting Internet access to the > poor, they don't justify going further into debt at a time when the US > can't make more than token payments on its principal. Apparently it's the constitutional right of every American to have cheap 'n easy access to alt.binaries.pictures.erotica ... Art Walker (walker@guinness.unomaha.edu) (walker@beeble.omahug.org) ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 08:19:00 +12000 From: jonathan.mosen@OOSIGHT.NACJACK.GEN.NZ (Jonathan Mosen) Subject: Are we Being Ripped Off in New Zealand? Organization: OUT OF SIGHT BBS, Auckland, New Zealand, 64-9-298-3805 Here in New Zealand, we've recently hosted a telecommunications show. Many of the world's major individual and corporate movers and shakers were present. The limelight was stolen by an Australian telecommun- ications "expert", who was doing the talk show circuit claiming that the world's telecommunications companies were involved in a massive cartel designed to extort huge sums of money from the unsuspecting consumer. He claimed that it would be possible for a call to be made from New Zealand to Hawaii for 25 cents a day. That's about 40 US cents. The reply from a representative of Telecom here in New Zealand basically amounted to "but long distance calls are heavily subsidizing other areas such as line rental". I don't work in the telecommunications industry, but as someone who often has phone charges of over $600 a month due to the huge amount of LD calling I do, I'd like to hear some opinions from the experts in the Digest as to whether we're all being ripped off, or whether this Australian's analysis was too simplistic. Jonathan [Moderatator's Note: As international calling services such as Tele- passport have gotten underway, a number of folks have begun noticing how much less international calls *could* cost, with the proprietors still making a profit. The TP rates are typically 40-50 percent less than 'the cartel' charges. I don't know if I agree with his exact figures or not, but even considering cross-subsidies where they still occur, long distance in general costs too much. PAT] ------------------------------ Subject: 7-bit Zmodem Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 7:12:11 CDT From: Cliff Sharp From DSZ.DOC, 11/92 version: _______________________________________________________________________ | Feature | ProCm | RZSZ | DSZ | GSZ | ZCOMM | Pro-YAM | |________________________|_______|______|______|_____|_______|_________| | | | | | | | | |ZMODEM-90(TM) | no | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | Compression | no | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | MobyTurbo(TM) | no | YES* | YES | YES | YES | YES | | 7-bit Paths OK | no | YES* | YES* | YES | YES | YES | |________________________|_______|______|______|_____|_______|_________| ProCm = ProComm Plus * Not available on all flavors or platforms Cliff Sharp clifto@indep1.chi.il.us OR clifto@indep1.uucp WA9PDM Use whichever one works ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 12:45:42 -0400 From: nadeem@alpha.acast.nova.edu (Nadeem Haider) Subject: Wanted: Cellular Phone FAQ? Organization: Nova University, FL Can anyone direct me to a FAQ list on cellular phones, if such a thing exists? Just thought I'd give this a shot. nadeem ------------------------------ From: ian@cyberspace.com (Ian Eisenberg) Subject: AT&T System 75 Date: 14 Aug 1993 00:59:27 -0700 Organization: (CYBERSPACE) Public Internet 206.286.1600 Does anyone know if an AT&T System 75 has positive disconnect on disconnect? I mean when a caller hangs up will there be a CPC disconnect. I need a drop in current or a reversal. Also can anyone recommend a good voicemail system to integrate into it? Please reply to ian@cyberspace.com ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 11:13:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Curtis E. Reid Subject: Emergency TDD to Use 311 I saw an article in today's {Democrat and Chronicle} (Rochester, NY August 14, 1993): Begin Excerpt: Rochester Tel, other firms plan emergency TDD number for deaf By Stephen Lowe, Staff Writer Rochester Telephone Corp. and other New York telephone companies plan to introduce a statewide emergency number for people with speech and hearing impairments. The 311 number is intended as a backup for users of the telecommunications device for the deaf who are traveling and don't know what number to call for emergency help. Now, some areas can handle TDD calls through 911. Other areas have differing seven-digit numbers for police and other emergency services that may or may not take TDD calls. The 311 number also will serve as an emergency number for TDD users in areas where 911 service is unavailable. "The object of 311 is to provide a universal means for a TDD user to reach an emergency services provider," said Diana Melville, spokeswoman for Rochester Tel. New York Telephone initiated the system and will introduce the 311 number when the service becomes available around the Capital District of Albany tomorrow. In late October, New York Telephone, Rochester Tel and other companies will start up 311 across the state. A person using a TDD can call 311 and the call will be routed to a barracks of the state police. An attendant will take the call and dispatch emergency services if they are needed. TDD users can still call 911 in areas with systems that can handle TDD calls, such as Monroe, Genesee and Wyoming counties. And they still can call seven-digit numbers of emergency providers that have TDD ability, such as the Ontario County Sheriff's Department. Matthew Starr, program director for the Monroe County Association for Hearing Impaired People, said there is a need for such a system. "But I think they should make efforts to have all areas covered by 911 systems to avoid the confusion," he said. Even with 311, the service is useless if there is no TDD available, he said. Often, public phones along highways do not have built-in TDDs, Starr said. And even if a person has a portable TDD, many require power outlets, which are not available at public phones along roads, Starr said. --------------- Curtis E. Reid CER2520@ritvax.isc.rit.edu Rochester Institute of Technology/NTID REID@DECUS.org (DECUS) 52 Lomb Memorial Drive 716.475.6089 TDD/TT 475.6895 Voice Rochester, NY 14623-5604 U.S.A. 716.475.6500 Fax (Business Use Only) ------------------------------ From: gmw1@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu (Gabe M Wiener) Subject: Who Runs 800 DA? Date: 14 Aug 1993 15:27:23 GMT Organization: Columbia University I've often wondered about this. Who runs 800 DA? Does each long distance carrier have their own bureau for this? Or is there one central 800 DA administered by ...? Gabe Wiener -- gmw1@columbia.edu -- N2GPZ -- PGP on request [Moderator's Note: 800 DA is operated by Southwestern Bell out of an office near St. Louis. I think Bellcore has ultimate responsibility for it. The default for 800 numbers is a non-pub listing, but anyone with an 800 number can contract to be listed at some fee through the carrier which supplies their service. Administrative fees to run the service and supply listings on demand include the cost of the phone call to 800-555-1212 itself which is why the call is free to people calling it. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 12:53:22 -0400 From: nadeem@alpha.acast.nova.edu (Nadeem Haider) Subject: List of Some IVR Vendors Available Organization: Nova University, FL A few months ago I had posted a request for a list Integrated Voice Response systems' vendors and received quite a few email messages. If someone is interested in this I could post a list of all the vendors and telephone numbers that I was informed about. Let me know. nadeem ------------------------------ From: rdippold@qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold) Subject: RFD: comp.dcom.telecom.tech Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1993 22:04:46 GMT Request for Discussion Unmoderated group comp.dcom.telecom.tech This will also be submitted to the moderated groups comp.dcom.telecom and comp.std.wireless. Note followups to news.groups - all discussion should take place there. Proposed Charter This group would cover all general technology aspects of the telecommunications industry in an unmoderated format. This includes communications mediums (physical transport, wiring, antennas), control systems (switches, routing, ATM), wireless systems (AMPS, NAMPS, PCN, PCS, CDMA, TDMA, GSM), and more (such as the history of the above, and new advances). It is expected that discussions which begin to focus on implementation aspects of subjects which are covered by existing groups would be moved to those groups - for instance, discussion about Class 3 Fax design specifics would go to comp.dcom.modems. Background Currently, the Telecom Digest is gated to Usenet via comp.dcom.telecom. Readers of this group and alt.dcom.telecom have expressed a strong interest in a main hierarchy group for informal technical telecommun- ications discussion. It is believed that the existence of such a group will encourage discussions on the subject that are usefully different from what is currently available, and that there are enough interested Usenet readers (although we'll see what the RFD brings). ------------------------------ From: TELECOM Moderator Subject: Administrivia: Another Break-In; Weekend Reading Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 17:00:00 CDT I was unpleasantly surprised to find out this afternoon that our Digest has once again been victimized by a hacker. The damage was more severe this time, with the telecom maintainence account broken into, and a lot of the files erased. The mailing lists were stolen as well. Readers may recall that a few months ago one of the mailing lists (the one that happened to be sitting in place for sendmail to use it at the time) got ripped off by a Big-Man-on-Campus who was blowing off steam over on the alt side of things. Today's incident caused about a two hour delay this afternoon in getting messages out while the lists and a couple of my scripts used to put together issues, etc. were reconstructed from backups I have stashed away on other Internet accounts I own around the world. I *think* the lists are all correct; if you had asked for cancellation and suddenly see copies in your mailbox again, please let me know. Obviously the people who asked for addition to the list won't know why they did not get added until they write a second time. The mailing lists are growing by leaps and bounds as more independent BBS sites with internet connections are included (such as OnLine Now BBS, joining the Digest today ... welcome folks!) and readers migrate to the mailing list side from comp.dcom.telecom. Its too damn bad 'some people' have to destroy the work of others to get their own self-esteem to a manageable level. But then to a hacker, a great joke and fun-time for all frequently involves destroying the property of others and thinking nothing of it. I am reminded of the time California Cowboy called me on the phone at home late one night, giggling like a schoolgirl in love for the first time to demonstrate how some phriends (who did what is not clear to me) had just a few minutes earlier broken into the admin account of the voicemail system of a long distance carrier's office here in the Chicago area. They wanted me to listen to their handiwork; their newly recorded prompts and obscene greeting message, etc. I thought to myself later, "I need this?" ... So someone will eventually say who trashed me out today. Hackerphreaks *have* to brag and tell others; it is their nature. On a pleasanter closing note, two special mailings coming out to you for your weekend reading: the draft copy of a history of Arpanet, and a very detailed version of the FCC Equal Access regulations for you to print out and show the telecom people at your school. Watch for them in your email most likely sometime Sunday. Cheers. PAT ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #575 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa03971; 15 Aug 93 16:50 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA05938 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Sun, 15 Aug 1993 11:43:36 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA30721 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Sun, 15 Aug 1993 11:42:45 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 11:42:45 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308151642.AA30721@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@delta.eecs.nwu.edu Subject: FCC Equal Access Rules Here is the copy of the Equal Access Order which was promised. First read it and make sure *you* understand it, then show it to telecom administrators at your school if you feel they are not in compliance. Subject: FCC Equal Access Order Date: Fri, 13 Aug 93 09:44:31 -0400 From: James Olsen For inclusion in the archives, here follows the FCC's 1991 order on equal access and telephone consumer information. 56 FR 18519 NO. 78 04/23/91 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Parts 64 and 68 [CC Docket No. 90-313; FCC 91-116] Common Carriers; Operator Service Providers AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: These final regulations establish policies and standards for the provision of operator services and implement provisions of the Telephone Operator Consumer Services Improvement Act of 1990, Public Law No. 101-435, 104 Stat. 986 (1990) (to be codified at 47 U.S.C. 226). These regulations will provide consumers with the opportunity to make informed choices when using operator services and to freely reach their desired carriers. EFFECTIVE DATE: May 23, 1991. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally J. Novak, Enforcement Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 632-4887. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report and Order in CC Docket No. 90-313 (FCC 91-116), adopted April 9, 1991 and released April 15, 1991. The full text of the Report and Order is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Dockets Branch, room 230, 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, DC. The full text of this Report and Order may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Downtown Copy Center, 1114 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 452-1422. Summary of Report and Order I. Background 1. On April 9, 1991, the Commission adopted a Report and Order in CC Docket No. 90-313 (released April 15, 1991, FCC 91-116) in order to establish policies and standards for the provision of operator services and to adopt rules necessitated by the Telephone Operator Consumer Services Improvement Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-435, 104 Stat. 986 (1990) (to be codified at 47 U.S.C. 226) ("Operator Services Act" or "Act"). 2. On June 14, 1990, the Commission adopted the initial Notice of Proposed Rule Making in CC Docket No. 90-313, 55 FR 29639 (1990) (NPRM). In the NPRM, the Commission proposed specific rules aimed at solving problems in the operator services industry that have persisted despite previous Commission action. During the first week of October 1990, Congress passed the Operator Services Act, which the President signed into law shortly thereafter. Under the Act, the Commission must, inter alia, conduct a "general" rule making proceeding to prescribe regulations that will implement statutory provisions and establish certain standards and policies, and a monitoring/reporting proceeding that will ultimately result in three reports to Congress. On December 21, 1990, the Commission released a Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 56 FR 402 (1991) (FNPRM) in order to: (1) "Initiate" the general rule making and monitoring/reporting proceedings required by the Act; (2) propose the required rules; (3) invite any additional comments that were necessary beyond those submitted in response to the NPRM; (4) solicit the information that must be examined in the monitoring/reporting proceeding; and (5) declare that, under the Act, the access and payphone compensation issues must be considered in a separate proceeding. The rules proposed in the FNPRM supplanted those proposed in the initial NPRM. 3. The Report and Order delegates to the Chief of the Common Carrier Bureau authority to impose such reporting requirements as are necessary to fulfill the monitoring/reporting obligations mandated by section 226(h)(3)(B) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 226(h)(3)(B). The monitoring/reporting proceeding was initiated as Phase II of CC Docket No. 90-313. 4. In response to the NPRM and FNPRM over 450 parties filed comments and reply comments. The Commission is required by the Act to adopt the rules required in the general rulemaking by May 15, 1991. II. Discussion 5. The majority of commenters agreed with the rules as proposed by the Commission in the FNPRM. With the exception of rules for which clarification or modification was requested, the Commission is adopting those rules as proposed and without discussion./1/ NOTE /1/ The rules requiring OSPs to ensure aggregators' compliance by contract or tariff with certain requirements were unopposed. See Sec. 64.703(e) (posting requirements), Sec. 64.704(b)(1) (call blocking), and Sec. 64.705(a)(5) (charges for access code calls). Commenters did not request clarification with respect to the majority of definitions proposed in Sec. 64.708, specifically, subsections (a), (c), (d), (f), and (h). Section 64.704(a), which requires that "800" and "950" access be unblocked, was supported by the commenters. A. Definitions 6. Section 64.708 of the rules defines a number of fundamental terms. The Commission is adopting the definitions contained in Sec. 64.708 of the rules with some clarification and modification. 7. The Commission is adopting Sec. 64.708(b) of the rules, the definition of "aggregator," with some clarification. An "aggregator" has certain enumerated responsibilities under the Act and the Commission's rules, among them posting the required information on or near the telephone and ensuring that its telephones do not block "800" or "950" access. The Commission believes that the "aggregator" is the entity that is in the position to comply with these requirements through its access to and control of the telephone equipment, a determination that must be based on the facts of each situations. Congress has made clear that pay telephone owners, hotels, and other premises owners may be aggregators under the Act. Therefore, a blanket determination by the Commission regarding who the aggregator is with regard to all payphones will not help to meet the Commission's goals of ensuring the availability of consumer information and consumer choice. Instead, the Commission will interpret the definitions broadly enough to ensure compliance with the goals of the Commission's rules and the Act. Each entity that exercises control over telephone equipment, whether through ownership of the equipment, control of access to the equipment, or some other means, will be responsible as an "aggregator" under the Act and the Commission's rules. In some situations, the premises owner and the pay telephone owner will be jointly responsible as "aggregators" by virtue of their joint access to and control over the telephone equipment; in some situations the "provider of operator services" will also be an "aggregator" who must comply with the provisions of the Act and the Commission's rules. In order to remove any ambiguity and to avoid debate over who is responsible for ensuring compliance with the Act and the Commission's rules, joint aggregators will be equally responsible for complying with the Act and the rules. 8. The Commission concludes that the definition of "aggregator" does not apply to correctional institutions in situations in which they provide inmate-only phones. The Commission is persuaded that the provision of such phones to inmates presents an exceptional set of circumstances that warrants their exclusion from the regulation being considered herein. Accordingly, inmate-only phones at correctional institutions will not be subject to any requirements under the Act or the Commission's rules./2/ Phones provided for the use of the public, however, such as those in visitation areas, would be covered by the Operator Services Act and the rules. NOTE /2/ Additionally, the carrier providing service to inmate-only phones at correctional institutions would not fall under the definition of "provider of operator services" as such service is not provided at an "aggregator" location with respect to inmate-only phones. A carrier that provides service to phones at correctional institutions that are made available to the public or to transient users would have to comply with the requirements of the Commission's rules and the Operator Services Act. 9. The Commission also finds that hospitals and universities are clearly within the scope of the definition of "aggregator." In discussing the definition, the Senate Committee said that "[a]ggregators include hotels and motels, hospitals, universities, airports, gas stations, pay telephone owners, and others. S. Rep. No. 439, 101st Cong., 2d Sess. 10 (1990). 10. The Commission is not persuaded that federal executive agencies (FEA) should be excluded from the definition of "aggregator." The Commission has previously found that governmental entities are subject to its jurisdiction. Graphnet Systems, Inc., 73 FCC 2d 283 (1979) (finding that the United States Postal Service was not exempt from Commission jurisdiction due to its status as a governmental entity). First, the Communications Act has conferred upon the Commission broad and expansive regulatory authority over interstate communications by wire and radio. Second, while the term "person" in the Communications Act is defined to include certain entities, there is no indication that the list is all-inclusive and that entities not specifically mentioned are to be excluded. Finally, when Congress has sought to exclude governmental entities from the Commission's jurisdiction they have done so explicitly./3/ The Commission also notes that the legislative intent of Congress would be frustrated by excluding "governmental entities" from regulation under the Operator Services Act and the rules. Hence, to the extent such agencies make phones available to the public or to transient users for the placing of operator-assisted interstate telephone calls, they clearly provide the type of service contemplated by the Operator Services Act and therefore come within the statutory requirements of the Act and under the Commission's rules. NOTE /3/ For example, radio stations operated by the United States are excluded from regulation under title III of the Communications Act. The FEA, however, points to the explicit inclusion of "governmental entities" within a definition of person included in the Cable Franchise Policy and Communications Act of 1984, Public Law No. 98-549, 98 Stat. 2779 (Title VI of the Communications Act) as dispositive with regard to the issue of jurisdiction over "governmental entities." The FEA contends that when Congress wants to include governmental entities within the Commission's jurisdiction, they do so explicity. There is no merit to this argument as the definition of "person" in title VI of the Communications Act is for the purposes of title VI specifically and was not meant to limit generally the definition of "person" in title I. The fact that Congress has explicitly confirmed that a government entity is a "person" under title VI does not mean a governmental entity is not also a person under the title I definition. 11. Those sections of the rules defining "operator services" and "providers of operator services," sections 64.708 (g) and (i) respectively, will be adopted as proposed. The legislative history of the Operator Services Act states that "operator services" include Interstate telecommunications services that involve any assistance to a consumer to arrange for billing other than to the number from which the call was placed. This definition includes assistance provided either by a "live" person or by automation, such as voice recordings or "bong-in-a-box" services. Carriers may not escape this definition by employing a particular technology that does not involve a "live" operator. S. Rep. No. 439, 101st Cong., 2d Sess. 11 (1990). Clearly, Congress intended that automated technologies be included within the definition of "operator services" and that those who provide service through such automated technologies are "providers of operator services" under the Act and the Commission's rules. The Commission emphasizes that "store-and-forward" and "bong-in-the-box" as well as other automated technologies do not fall within the exemption to the definition of "operator services" found in Sec. 64.708(g)(1) of the rules. Further, the Commission is not persuaded that a distinction should be drawn between automated billing provided by a hotel vis-a-vis similar services provided by entities that offer such services as their primary business. Hotels providing automated billing fall within the definition of "provider of operator services" and must comply with the Act and the Commission's rules. 12. Consistent with the Act, the Commission is modifying Sec. 64.708(e), the definition of "equal access," to reflect the inclusion of only those orders amending the Modification of Final Judgment (MFJ) issued prior to October 17, 1990 rather than inclusion of those orders modifying the MFJ issued prior to the effective date of the rule. The Commission is adopting the remainder of the definitions in Sec. 64.708 as proposed. B. Consumer Information 1. Requirements for Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 13. The Commission is adopting without modification Sec. 64.703(a) of the rules that requires OSPs to brand calls, to allow consumers to terminate calls before connection without incurring a charge, and to disclose information about rates and charges without charge upon consumer request. These requirements apply to both "live" operators and automated technologies. With regard to the branding requirement in Sec. 64.703(a)(1), the first brand must occur "at the beginning of the call." See 47 U.S.C. 226(b)(1)(A). The Commission does not believe that a brand after a consumer has entered a billing number and that number has been validated is "at the beginning of the call." For automated systems, the Commission requires that the first brand occur prior to the bong tone, since the bong tone usually signals callers to begin entering a billing number. This requirement will help ensure that consumers hear all of the branding information and have the opportunity to make an informed choice to use a particular OSP. 14. The Commission will not prohibit parties involved in rate-setting from deciding which party will be named in the brand. The Commission will, however, prohibit parties from branding in the name of another party if rates are merely modeled on or copied from that party's rates and that party has not consented to the use of its name in the brand. 15. Finally, with regard to automated technologies only, the Commission believes the provision of rate and other information via the use of a separate toll-free number is a reasonable method of compliance with the Commission's rule. As technology is developed that eliminates the necessity for a separate number, however, the use of that number should also be eliminated. The Commission clarifies that any rates quoted by an OSP must be exact rather than approximate. The Operator Services Act is clear that quotes for rates or charges must be for "the call" (see 47 U.S.C. 226(b)(1)(C)(i)) not for some hypothetical call. Rates should be quoted based on the pricing of the specific call. 2. Aggregator Posting Requirements and State Requirements 16. The Commission is adopting as proposed Sec. 64.703(b) that requires aggregators to post certain information on or near telephones in plain view of consumers and Sec. 64.703(d) that provides that the posting requirement will not apply if state law or regulation requires an aggregator to take actions that are substantially the same as the requirements of Sec. 64.703(b). The Commission finds that all aggregator telephones, including those in non-equal access areas, are subject to the posting requirements. 17. The Commission clarifies that the required information must be posted on or near all aggregator telephones. For example, it is not sufficient that the required information is posted on or near only one telephone in a hotel suite or room with more than one telephone. Further, it is not sufficient that tent cards or stickers on or near a telephone merely refer the consumer to another source of information such as a pamphlet or hand-out that is not itself within plain view of the consumer. 18. The posting requirement adopted in these rules is a minimum standard. State requirements that include all the information required by the Commission's rule, though the wording may be different, will be "substantially the same," as comtemplated in Sec. 64.703(d) of the rules. Aggregators are responsible for complying with the Act and the Commission's rules. Aggregators are also responsible for reviewing and complying with any additional state requirements, where they exist. 3. Double Branding 19. The Act mandates that OSPs double brand for the three-year period commencing 90 days after its enactment. See 47 U.S.C. 226(b)(2). The rule as proposed required that OSPs double brand for three years from the effective date of the rules. The Commission is modifying Sec. 64.703(c) of the rules to provide that OSPs must double brand through January 14, 1994 in conformance with the Act. This rule applies to all OSPs regardless of size and to all calls including collect calls. C. Prohibition on Call Blocking 20. The Commission is adopting Sec. 64.704(a) and Sec. 64.704(b) as proposed. Section 64.704(a) of the rules requires that aggregators not block "800" and "950" access at phones presubscribed to an OSP. Section 64.704(b) requires that OSPs withhold compensation on a location-by-location basis from aggregators reasonably believed to be blocking such access. 21. The Commission will not provide notice of blocking to an OSP before the OSP is required to withhold compensation from an aggregator nor will the Commission compile for public dissemination listings of aggregators who purportedly block. The purpose of this rule is to provide additional incentive to OSPs to ensure that aggregators do not block "800" and "950" access. The Commission expects that OSPs will take steps necessary to ensure such compliance. 22. The Commission will make appropriate use of its forfeiture authority against offending OSPs and aggregators. Under section 503 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 503, the Commission can impose substantial forfeitures for willful or repeated violations of the Communications Act or its rules, regulations, or orders: For common carriers subject to the Communications Act, up to $100,000 for each violation or each day of a continuing violation, up to a total of $1,000,000 for a continuing violation; and for others, up to $10,000 for each violation or day of a continuing violation up to a total of $75,000 for continuous violation. This Commission will not hesitate to use its forfeiture authority against violators of its rules. D. Restrictions on Charges 23. The Commission is adopting Sec. 64.705 of the rules as proposed. Section 64.705 imposes restrictions on billing for unanswered calls, call splashing, and surcharges for using a carrier other than the presubscribed OSP. OSPs in equal access areas are prohibited from billing for unanswered calls. The rule clearly recognizes, however, that answer supervision is not available in non-equal access areas and requires that OSPs not 'knowingly' bill for unanswered calls in non-equal access areas. Providers of automated message delivery services (AMDS), may bill for the provision of AMDS, but a provider of AMDS may not bill for the initial call when it is unanswered as provided for in Sec. 64.705. 24. The prohibition on splashing unless the consumer is informed and consents strikes the appropriate balance in protecting consumers from being billed for calls that do not reflect their originating points and allowing consumers to make an informed decision to have calls splashed. Finally, by prohibiting aggregators from imposing surcharges on access code calls that are not charged for calls using the presubscribed OSPs, the Commission further ensures that consumers have the ability to choose their preferred carrier in a competitive marketplace. E. Emergency Calls 25. The Commission is adopting with modifications Sec. 64.706 of the rules that establishes minimum standards for the handling of emergency calls by OSPs. The Commission reiterates that the subject of emergency calls is an area that the Commission has traditionally left to the states and stresses that the Commission is adopting a minimum standard that is not intended to preempt state requirements. The Commission notes that this standard applies to "store-and-forward," "bong-in-a-box," and other automated technologies. 26. The Commission is modifying the rule to require that, in instances where the originating call location is different from the site of the emergency and the site of the emergency is known, the call be connected to the appropriate emergency service for the reported site of the emergency. The Commission requires OSPs (i) to immediately connect an emergency call (ii) to the emergency service provider that responds to the type of reported emergency (iii) at the site of the emergency, if known, or, if not known, to the originating location of the emergency call. 27. The Commission is also modifying the rule to exclude specific examples of dialing sequences that might initiate an emergency call. All emergency calls, no matter how initiated, are covered by the Commission's rules. F. Public Dissemination of Information 28. The Commission is adopting Section 64.707 of the rules as proposed. The Act requires that the Commission "establish a policy for requiring providers of operator services to make public information about recent changes in operator services and choices available to consumers in that market." 47 U.S.C. 226(d)(4)(B). In order that consumers are aware of changes in the marketplace, the Commission believes it is necessary for each OSP to provide information not only about itself, but also about the market within which it is providing service. Accordingly, OSPs will be required to disseminate information, upon request, that describes their own services, recent changes in those services, and services and trends in the industry as a whole. Detailed descriptions of rates, charges, and offerings of competitors were never contemplated by the Commission. Rather, the Commission expects OSPs to make available generic descriptions of any recent changes or innovations in operator services. The Commission believes such descriptions may be done in a fashion that complies with other applicable legal requirements./4/ NOTE /4/ With respect to the argument made by a commenter that the requirement would violate the information services restriction of the MFJ, the Commission notes that matters requiring interpretation of the MFJ are properly within the jurisdiction of the district court. See NYSMSA Limited Partnership, 58 RR 2d 525, 530 (1985). However, since no use of transmission capability would be required to comply with the Act, it is unclear how the MFJ is implicated. 29. The Commission is not adopting an exception for smaller OSPs. Consumers using even the smallest OSPs have the right to request and receive information regarding that OSP's own rates and services as well as general information regarding the operator services market. G. Equipment Capabilities 30. The Commission is adopting Sec. 68.318(d) of the rules as proposed. The Act mandates that aggregator software and equipment manufactured or imported on or after April 17, 1992, be technologically capable of providing access to OSPs via equal access codes. 47 U.S.C. 226(f). The Commission is limiting the equipment capabilities requirement to 10XXX capability for the 1992 deadline. The Commission expects aggregator equipment that is the subject of the rule to be technologically capable of providing access via the 10XXX access code. The Commission will address issues relating to fraud and unblocking of the 10XXX access code in a separate proceeding./5/ NOTE /5/ Policies and Rules Concerning Operator Service Access and Pay Telephone Compensation, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, CC Docket No. 91-35, FCC 91-53, 56 FR 11136 (1991). III. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analyis 31. Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, the Commission's final analysis is as follows: 32. Need and purpose of this action. This Report and Order adopts regulations to implement the Telephone Operator Consumer Services Improvement Act of 1990, Public Law No. 101-435, 104 Stat. 986 (1990). The adopted rules are intended to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive practices related to their use of operator services to place interstate telephone calls and to ensure that consumers have the opportunity to make informed choices in making such calls. 33. Summary of the issues raised by the public comments in response to the Initial and Further Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. There were no comments submitted in response to the Initial or Further Regulatory Flexibility Analyses that are relevant to the rules adopted herein. 34. Significant alternatives considered and rejected. The Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making (FNPRM) in this proceeding offered many proposals. The commenters supported the basic thrust of this proceeding, with many suggesting modifications to the Commission's proposals. The Commission considered all of the alternatives presented in the proceeding and considered all of the timely filed comments directed to the various issues in the NPRM and FNPRM. After carefully weighing all aspects of the issues and comments in this proceeding, the Commission has taken the most reasonable course of action under the mandate of the Operator Services Act. IV. Ordering Clauses 35. Accordingly, It is ordered, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201- 205, 226, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, 226, 303(r), that parts 64 and 68 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR parts 64 and 68, are amended as set forth in Rule Changes below. 36. It is Further ordered That this Report and Order will be effective thirty (30) days after publication in the Federal Register. List of Subjects 47 CFR Part 64 Communications common carriers, Computer technology, Radio, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Telegraph, Telephone. 47 CFR Part 68 Administrative practice and procedure, Communications common carriers, Communications equipment, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Telephone. Federal Communications Commission. Donna R. Searcy, Secretary. Rule Changes Parts 64 and 68 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations are amended as follows: PART 64--[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 64 is revised to read as follows: Authority: Sec. 4, 48 Stat. 1066, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154, unless otherwise noted. Interpret or apply secs. 201, 218, 226, 48 Stat. 1070, as amended, 1077, 47 U.S.C. 201, 218, 226, unless otherwise noted. 2. A new Sec. 64.703 is added to subpart G to read as follows: Sec. 64.703 Consumer information. (a) Each provider of operator services shall: (1) Identify itself, audibly and distinctly, to the consumer at the beginning of each telephone call and before the consumer incurs any charge for the call; (2) Permit the consumer to terminate the telephone call at no charge before the call is connected; and (3) Disclose immediately to the consumer, upon request and at no charge to the consumer-- (i) A quotation of its rates or charges for the call; (ii) The methods by which such rates or charges will be collected; and (iii) The methods by which complaints concerning such rates, charges, or collection practices will be resolved. (b) Each aggregator shall post on or near the telephone instrument, in plain view of consumers: (1) The name, address, and toll-free telephone number of the provider of operator services; (2) A written disclosure that the rates for all operator-assisted calls are available on request, and that consumers have a right to obtain access to the intestate common carrier of their choice and may contact their preferred interstate common carriers for information on accessing that carrier's service using that telephone; and (3) The name and address of the Enforcement Division of the Common Carrier Bureau of the Commission (FCC, Enforcement Division, CCB, room 6202, Washington, DC 20554), to which the consumer may direct complaints regarding operator services. (c) Additional requirements for first 3 years. In addition to meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, each presubscribed provider of operator services shall, until January 15, 1994, identify itself audibly and distinctly to the consumer, not only as required in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, but also for a second time before connecting the call and before the consumer incurs any charge. (d) Effect of state law or regulation. The requirements of paragraph (b) of this section shall not apply to an aggregator in any case in which State law or State regulation requires the aggregator to take actions that are substantially the same as those required in paragraph (b) of this section. (e) Each provider of operator services shall ensure, by contract or tariff, that each aggregator for which such provider is the presubscribed provider of operator services is in compliance with the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. 3. A new Sec. 64.704 is added to subpart G to read as follows: Sec. 64.704 Call blocking prohibited. (a) Each aggregator shall ensure that each of its telephones presubscribed to a provider of operator services allows the consumer to use "800" and "950" access code numbers to obtain access to the provider of operator services desired by the consumer. (b) Each provider of operator services shall: (1) Ensure, by contract or tariff, that each aggregator for which such provider is the presubscriber provider of operator services is in compliance with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section; and (2) Withhold payment (on a location-by-location basis) of any compensation, including commissions, to aggregators if such provider reasonably believes that the aggregator is blocking access to interstate common carriers in violation of paragraph (a) of this section. 4. A new Sec. 64.705 is added to subpart G to read as follows: Sec. 64.705 Restrictions on charges related to the provision of operator services. (a) A provider of operator services shall: (1) Not bill for unanswered telephone calls in areas where equal access is available; (2) Not knowingly bill for unanswered telephone calls where equal access is not available; (3) Not engage in call splashing, unless the consumer requests to be transferred to another provider of operator services, the consumer is informed prior to incurring any charges that the rates for the call may not reflect the rates from the actual originating location of the call, and the consumer then consents to be transferred; (4) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, not bill for a call that does not reflect the location of the origination of the call; and (5) Ensure, by contract or tariff, that each aggregator for which such provider is the presubscribed provider of operator services is in compliance with the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. (b) An aggregator shall ensure that no charge by the aggregator to the consumer for using an "800" or "950" access code number, or any other access code number, is greater than the amount the aggregator charges for calls placed using the presubscribed provider of operator services. 5. A new Sec. 64.706 is added to subpart G to read as follows: Sec. 64.706 Minimum standards for the routing and handling of emergency telephone calls. Upon receipt of any emergency telephone call, a provider of operator services shall immediately connect the call to the appropriate emergency service of the reported location of the emergency, if known, and, if not known, of the originating location of the call. 6. A new Sec. 64.707 is added to subpart G to read as follows: Sec. 64.707 Public dissemination of information by providers of operator services. Providers of operator services shall regularly publish and make available at no cost to inquiring consumers written materials that describe any recent changes in operator services and in the choices available to consumers in that market. 7. A new Sec. 64.708 is added to subpart G to read as follows: Sec. 64.708 Definitions. As used in Secs. 64.703 through 64.707 of this part and Sec. 68.318 of this chapter (47 CFR 64.703-64.707, 68.318): (a) Access code means a sequence of numbers that, when dialed, connect the caller to the provider of operator services associated with that sequence; (b) Aggregator means any person that, in the ordinary course of its operations, makes telephones available to the public or to transient users of its premises, for interstate telephone calls using a provider of operator services; (c) Call splashing means the transfer of a telephone call from one provider of operator services to another such provider in such a manner that the subsequent provider is unable or unwilling to determine the location of the origination of the call and, because of such inability or unwillingness, is prevented from billing the call on the basis of such location; (d) Consumer means a person initiating any interstate telephone call using operator services; (e) Equal access has the meaning given that term in Appendix B of the Modification of Final Judgment entered by the United States District Court on August 24, 1982, in United States v. Western Electric, Civil Action No. 82- 0192 (D.D.C. 1982), as amended by the Court in its orders issued prior to October 17, 1990; (f) Equal access code means an access code that allows the public to obtain an equal access connection to the carrier associated with that code; (g) Operator services means any interstate telecommunications service initiated from an aggregator location that includes, as a component, any automatic or live assistance to a consumer to arrange for billing or completion, or both, of an interstate telephone call through a method other than: (1) Automatic completion with billing to the telephone from which the call originated; or (2) Completion through an access code used by the consumer, with billing to an account previously established with the carrier by the consumer; (h) Presubscribed provider of operator services means the interstate provider of operator services to which the consumer is connected when the consumer places a call using a operator services without dialing an access code; (i) Provider of operator services means any common carrier that provides operator services or any other person determined by the Commission to be providing operator services. PART 68--[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 68 is revised to read as follows: Authority: Secs. 4, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 208, 215, 218, 226, 313, 314, 403, 404, 410, 602, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, 1070, 1071, 1072, 1073, 1076, 1077, 1087, 1094, 1098, 1102, 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 208, 215, 218, 226, 313, 314, 403, 404, 410, 602, unless otherwise noted. 2. Section 68.318 is amended by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows: Sec. 68.318 Additional limitations. * * * * * (d) Requirement that registered equipment allow access to common carriers. Any equipment or software manufactured or imported on or after April 17, 1992, and installed by any aggregator shall be technologically capable of providing consumers with access to interstate providers of operator services through the use of equal access codes. The terms used in this paragraph shall have the meanings defined in Sec. 64.708 of this chapter (47 CFR 64.708). [FR Doc. 91-9349 Filed 4-22-91; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-M   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa04169; 15 Aug 93 17:46 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA02576 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Sun, 15 Aug 1993 15:31:08 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA02559 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Sun, 15 Aug 1993 15:30:32 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 15:30:32 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308152030.AA02559@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #576 TELECOM Digest Sun, 15 Aug 93 15:30:30 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 576 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson There Ain't no Such Thing as a Free Network (Alan T. Furman) Cellular Conversation Results in Arrest (Les Reeves) Cellular Phone Helps Catch James Jordan's Alleged Murderers (Paul R. Coen) My Idea to Stop Cellular Fraud (Bruce James Robert Linley) About 'Terminal Compression' (Paul Robinson) CONNECT Sept/Oct Issue Review (Patricia Snyder-Rayl) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: atfurman@cup.portal.com Subject: There Ain't no Such Thing as a Free Network Date: Sun, 15 Aug 93 03:34:21 PDT Here is an exchange I found posted in alt.amateur-comp. It deals with the evolution of the Internet from a service which government agencies, like DARPA and the National Science Foundation, provided to funded researchers for the taking, to an industry which includes commercial operators. Remarks shown quoted are by Ronda Hauben, publisher of Amateur Computerist, who believes that this change will impede scientific research by driving up data networking costs. The remainder of the post is the response by Vadim Antonov. ========= from alt.amateur-comp =========== In <24bcc5$bih@news.ysu.edu>, Ronda Hauben (ae547@yfn.ysu.edu) wrote: > Who will the govt support, and who will they pay to provide this service > that was created with taxpayer money in the first place. Taxpayers paid for *research*. Internet is no longer a research project, it became a commodity. No reason for the government to provide services available commercially. > And as soon as the NSF subsidy is off watch the prices skyrocket Not. I can't disclose commercial plans of my company but sure I know that better than you. > Commercial radio and tv and cable show what happens when the > commercial world runs the show - its a very different > world that exists - an advertising or commercial dominated > content. Those are *monopolies*. The market of Internet services is completely unregulated and the tough competition is already in there. > The history of network development in the U.S. has been > so successful with regard to the Arpanet and NSFNet > and Usenet because the commercial market forces were > controlled or not allowed. The history proves right opposite. Look at the development of networking in Russia -- before perestroyka only government has rights to develop networks. Briefly, it was a disaster. Then, as soon as it become lawful private companies stepped in, and now the largest network (RELCOM) has about 50 backbones all over the country and its DNS has more than 10000 institutional domains. It produces more USENET traffic than all Europe together. My team started all this three years ago with a single 486 PC, a Telebit modem and zero outside investments. Now, in the USSR it wasn't (and still isn't) like US -- you can't go and buy a circuit from a phone company. Even installation of a regular dial-up voice grade line takes months. The reason for success? The network had no any kind of AUP (because it wasn't funded by govt) and therefore enjoyed a strong demand from "commercial" customers -- i.e. banks, newspapers, manufacturers who paid real *money* which were immediately invested in further development. > Where they were given free reign as with commercial tv in the U.S. > or even with radio, the people have no access, except to listen to > what the party line is that will be passed onto us. Who bars you from starting your own radio station? Ah, yeah, the government regulations. > Since deregulation of AT&T in 1984, the wonders of this so called > "market driven" heaven has been a real fraud. Hm. US has the cheapest phone tarrifs among all the industrial countries *because* of that de-regulation. FYI. > Many of the pay phones around are a bunch of junk, often not > working. Because they belong to local providers which are *monopolies*. Your example proves exactly opposite to your "conclusions". > There's no one to complain to. Pick a phone book and call your congressman and tell him/her that you're interested in de-regulation of the local telephone service market. > The essence of a net is that all parts of it are important - > and that low quality at one part affects every other part. The essence of Internet is *diversity*. If you don't like your low-quality part go choose another provider. > Which is really the govt giveaway of the product of years of > research and experience to private companies to dissipate it > into a Shop on your computer or inventory with your computer > heaven. Nah. The product is available to everybody equally. It's just some people are willing to pick it and risk their money on making it a service while others whine about free lunch going away. > But there was an effort to privatize before the NSFNet was formed > and it was somehow defeated then. Huh? The word is not "privatization". Nobody's going to give NSFNET to a private company simply because the actual hardware was private property (of ANS) from the very beginning. > In Britain in the early days of the Industrial Revolution, the > Merchants like Mun claimed that their interests were the interests of > the Nation. That if the King did what they needed to make them richer, > the whole Nation would benefit. Irrelevant. > That wasn't true then. > A similar argument is being made now by business interests. > They have abolished any public interest. > To help them make more profit is being touted as the saving for all. Oh, no. Another commie. I thought i got my load of them in USSR. > Their making more profit does not benefit me nor lots of other > working people in the U.S. Oh, sure. Why should the things *I* do benefit *you*? Are you a cripple? Can't you make your own living? > The Arpanet could develop because it was free of commercial > pressures, not because it was dictated by them. Bull. ARPA stands for Advanced Research Projects Agency -- of the Department of Defense. It was a purely military stuff. Like Star Wars. > The same was true of the NSFNet and Unix and Usenet. NSFNET is operated by ANS which is a for-profit company. Unix was developed by AT&T which was (and is) for-profit company. USENET is not a physical network and essentially was developed by few people. > To subject network development to the bottom line is to doom it. Have you developed a network to judge people who did? > But the fact that 25 years of expereince to build the net can be > thrown out the window by the U.S. govt shows how weak any political or > democratic rights are for the people in the U.S. and how captured the > U.S. press is (again the wonder of the commercial world is > demonstrated in the total submissiveness to govt and party politics of > the U.S. press) It shows that there are still people who keep forgetting that there ain't no such thing as a free lunch. In a sense (if you like "social justice" and all other leftist crap) government spending tax money on networks available only to elite effectively robbed poor and enriched rich (aka professional elite). Have you heard of miners and janitors on the net recently? Their tax dollars were spent on it, too. >> Congratulations, Vadim! The first informed posting I've read here >> about the _future_ of the net. :-) > And so little informed posting about the past of the net as well - > the net was originally developed by the U.S. govt to save resources > (and money) by making it possible for different govt entities to > share computer resources. The network was designed to provide reliable way to communicate in case of partial destruction of the network by an enemy. It works fine -- allied forces were unable to destroy Saddam's command system which was (surprise) based on TCP/IP. Sharing resources etc wasn't the goal. > That did save money, and that whole experience and lesson is being > thrown out by the U.S. govt and those worthy citizens who are so > anxious to save the U.S. govt money by grabbing the net for their > profit making purposes. Take a life. Commercial companies spend their own money to build networks using the technology belonging to nobody. Can you own a natural law? There is *NO* transfer of physical or intellectual property from govt to private companies. If you still see evil capitalists going to steal everything you probably need a therapy. > The future reorganization being planned is such a departure from > the past and yet there is no discussion allowed challenging > the change before it is rushed into being. Discussion with *whom*? > Seems a little like a coup doesn't it. Seems like a reasonable move (and long overdue, I'd say). > I didn't know the laws had been passed providing for all this by > both the US House and Senate -- have they? Both US House and Senat use commercial Internet service providers. FYI. > What law provides for taking the net subsidy away? What law says government has to distribute free toys for white-collars? > Who has made these decisions? National Science Foundation. If you don't like the decision, the standard democratic procedure is open for you to dispute them. > On what basis? Because that's what they're for. > What a racket. Uh-huh. Can't you understand TANSTAFL? > It seems there's a real effort to pretend that there was no past and > that the present has popped out of nowhere - It seems that somebody got no clue about the past and tries to reinvent the history to fit it into a communist dogma. --vadim avg@sprintlink.com Disclaimer: I do not speak for or express the opinions of my present or previous employers. All opinions above are mine. ========== end of Usenet post ========== Forwarded to the Internet TELECOM Digest by Alan T. Furman atfurman@cup.portal.com [Moderator's Note: Thanks very much for passing that along, Alan. Actually we will be hearing more from Ronda this afternoon in this group. I have a lengthy discussion of the early days of Arpanet and some other comments by her which will go out as a special mailing following this issue most likely, or sometime today. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 10:46:41 -0400 (EDT) From: LESREEVES@delphi.com Subject: Cellular Conversation Results in Arrest Two teenagers have been arrested and charged with the murder of Michael Jordan's father. The news reports say that the content of conversations made from Mr. Jordan's cellular phone led to the arrest. Have similar cases not been thrown out when it was revealed that cellular phones were monitored? ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 11:25:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul R. Coen Subject: Cellular Phone Helps Catch James Jordan's Alleged Murderers? Organization: Drew University Academic Technology I heard a news story on WCBS (880 AM, New York) this morning saying that the two 18-year-olds arrested for murdering Michael Jordan's father were tripped up in part by a cellular phone. Apparently, he pulled off the highway to rest, they shot him, dumped him in South Carolina, and kept the car for a few days -- and used the cellular phone in the car. The story claimed that the calls were "traced," but I took that to mean that they looked at the numbers called by the two via the cellphone and narrowed it down from there. I'm not going to comment on the common sense of the pair -- if they had any, they wouldn't have been shooting anyone in the first place. If criminals were less careless, though, I don't know what the police would do. ------------------------------ From: linley@netcom.com (Bruce James Robert Linley) Subject: My Idea to Stop Cellular Fraud Organization: UCLA Alumni, B.S. Computer Science & Engineering Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 05:15:52 GMT I am not fully enlightened as to the intricacies of how the present cell phone system works today but would like to suggest how it might be improved to benefit the cell phone users and the cell phone companies. This is my little blurb. How about having the user pick some secret code when they first activate their cell phone. This code is used as a seed value for a psuedo-random number generating algorithm present in the cell phone and at the cell company. When the user makes a call, the algorithm generates a new psuedo-random number based on the previous psuedo-random number and the initially chosen seed. This number would be used as a 'validation' of the user's ESN. Since the user's phone and the cell company's system generate an identical sequence of psuedo-random numbers, each side knows precisely what validation code to expect from the user on the next call. But to a crook, who never knew the initial seed value, his ESN reader reads a seemingly unpredictable sequence of validation codes coming from every user. Even though the crook can get the algorithm (it is the same for all users), it is useless to him unless he knows both the users initial seed value and the number of calls he or she has made. Furthermore, if the crook gets lucky and duplicates the right validation code, the real user's next call will FAIL since his stream of validation codes is out of date. In this case, the user will at least have been alerted that his or her account has been compromised and can take corrective action by calling the cellular provider to suspend the account and have a new seed value programmed into both the user's phone and the user's account. Integration of this new system into existing cellular systems can be accomplished by dedicating a range of ESNs to the new system just like internet addresses are divided into groups as both, I believe, are 32-bit numbers. So, for ESNs in the 192.*.*.* to 255.*.*.* (to use the internet format) range, the system can expect a validation code to follow. Older (lower) ESNs would work as always with no validation code. Complexity is increased for the user's cell phone and the carrier's equipment as well, but fraud would virtually go away. And since both user and carrier share a unique and changeing validation code, future digital systems could use the code to digitally scramble the voice (like existing DES radios). So not only is fraud gone but reasonable privacy is restored to the "phone system." Is this a good idea? Well, it means higher cell phone equipment costs, at first anyway. It requires cell phone companies to spend money to modify their system and the FBI/NSA may not like the digital encryption part. Cell phones would need to have some kind of flash memory/eeprom/sram+battery to remember it's position in the stream of psuedo-random numbers. Well, how does this sound or am I just wishing for too much or asking the impossible? Or do cell phone companies think everything's "good enough" the way it is. Bruce James Robert Linley | My opinions, I make 'em up. B.S. Comp Sci & Engr, UCLA | linley@netcom.com | blinley@nyx.cs.du.edu [Moderator's Note: No, they certainly do not think 'everything is good enough the way it is'. Cell carriers are being eaten alive by fraud and they hope to stop it soon. It is a remarkable testament to how much money they have made in the past decade of their existence that they can lose a couple million dollars a month in a few cases and still be in business despite losses like that. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 02:33:36 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM Subject: About 'Terminal Compression' From: Paul Robinson Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA A company (Inter Pact) has run a number of advertisements on the Internet regarding the book 'Terminal Compression' which has been subsequently released in text form which can be downloaded via FTP, with the idea that if you read it you will send them a shareware donation. I probably would never have read the book if it hadn't been made available that way. The copyright slugs on the text indicate publication years of 1991-1993, seemingly indicating a recently issued book. (One of the items in the book is the mention of the new E-Mail address for the White House, which was only created this year.) The book has a number of holes in it which I could see through. I'll post these to other news groups so as not to go into non-telecom issues; I'll post larger articles to the Privacy and Risks lists. I will except this to mention one which is so obviously inaccurate as to be ridiculous: A government agency gets a court order telling the newspaper in the story, "The New York City Times" (note: not 'The New York Times' but the article makes clear that the paper on Sunday is '34 pounds') to not print any articles dealing with the ability to read CNG emissions (this is the leakage off a computer or monitor which can be read like a radio transmitter from a distance by electronic equipment.) A reporter writes an article from research, and an agency gets a prohibition not against that article -- which is a dubvious issue to get a prior restraint order against in the absence of use of government material, anyway - but that this court order is not to stop a particular article, but to completely prohibit any articles regarding that particular *subject*! I've never heard of a judge that would even consider issuing that type of order, (an appeals court would tear him to shreds) and this assumes the paper wouldn't (1) print the article anyway and risk a contempt citation (2) print a _blank_ article and a copy of the court order. Apparently this order was never publicized; any time a government agency tries to suppress publication of something in a newspaper it usually makes _national_ headlines; the press takes threats to the 1st Amendment *very* seriously. CNN's use of the Noriega Tapes comes to mind, and, of course, the Pentagon Papers and the A-Bomb schematics cases. Without intending to spoil the story, I wanted to point out that it mentions only AT&T as the national long distance carrier; a deafening silence exists about MCI and Sprint. Yet later in the book it mentions 'FTS-2000' the private network for governmwent telephone calls that MCI has unsuccessfully been fighting ever since 1/2 went to AT&T and 1/2 went to Sprint, from the time of its creation. At a point in the book, it mentions that the NSA uses its massive computer arrays to monitor -- in real time -- every telephone call connection made in the U.S., e.g. every dial call from and to any point and the call being forwarded, and to where. This seems to forget that despite there being some 160 LATAs in the U.S. where every call has to go through, not to mention the private cellular carriers, plus local call forwarding setups and call forwarding through PBXs. Plus private cellular companies, trunked mobile radiotelephone companies, ham radio patches ... Even in the book it mentions that one of the calls made by some of the criminal elements in the book went to 'a Canadian Cellular Exchange'. I find it hard to believe that a Canadian telephone company is going to let a U.S. government agency inquire into its phone system without a court order issued by a Canadian judge. Is Pacific Bell goint to allow someone from the Canadian Department of Revenue or Scotland Yard have the list of who owns what non-listed number without a U.S. Court Order? I think not. (I'll skip over the possibility of bribery for now.) I find it a bit far fetched to believe that it is possible to put a 'pen register' on every telephone call made in the United States. If I call into General Electric's PBX in New York, or Northrop's in Los Angeles, is a call transferred out of it (one of perhaps 100 that go out at any minute) mine or someone else's? Also, in the story it notes that voice, fax or data transmissions are detected and that encrypted ones are 'red flagged'. This is a crock. Bits are bits; there is no way to tell based on the bit stream going through a data call whether the Zmodem Binary transfer I make is a ZIP archive, an EXE file, a binary data file, a Word Perfect file, or a binary file which has been processed with PGP or RIPEM. Bits are Bits; there is no means to differentiate between a compressed, encrypted transmission (such as a file processed with PGP) and a binary data file. It could be possible due to echo cancellers to tell if someone is using a data transmission device; whether a fax or modem detection is possible is another thing. And it also assumes someone doesn't switch to a non-standard method of data transmission such as combined voice and data on a compressed transmission channel. Or local calls to non-telephone networks such as Compuserve. Or private long distance companies that don't use Feature Group service, but simply buy commercial inward lines in some cities and lease dedicated trunk space. The virus issues are a little ridiculous too. Now a couple of years ago a man named William Harrison, I think, wrote a book called 'virus'. With the same basic idea: a series of rogue computer programs can be used to allow someone to commit crimes. Harrison's book was much better: I've had more than 12 years of computer experience as well as extensive use of MSDOS and there wasn't *a single* technical mistake in Harrison's book. My sister is of the opinion that people don't notice technical errors in movies and TV shows. I do and I'm certain other people do, too. Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ------------------------------ From: pegasus@cyberspace.org (Patricia Snyder-Rayl) Subject: CONNECT Sept/Oct Issue Review Organization: GREX Public Access Unix +1 313 761 3000 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1993 21:48:36 GMT CONNECT Magazine -- Table of Contents Vol. 1, No. 3 September/October 1993 Available at Newsstands on August 17th FEATURES Riding the Wild Internet by Peter M. Plantec The author shares his experiences as a relative newcomer to the Internet, and gives you some excellent tips on places to go and things to do on the Net. The Electronic Frontier Foundation by Bill Rayl A look at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit organization devoted to making the online world a safer place for everyone. Conferencing 101 by Joseph Sewell What is conferencing and how can you get involved? This article tells you what conferencing is all about, and includes some tips to help the novice COer. GEnie's BBS RoundTable by David C. Cole The author introduces BBS users and sysops to GEnie's "gateway to online BBS resources." Qmodem Professional 1.5 by Bob Retelle A look at the latest release of the Qmodem Pro telecommunications software from Mustang Software, Inc., producers of WILDCAT! BBS. Your Business Needs a BBS by Susan Bloom A founding partner of The Business BBS shows how practically any business can benefit from running a company support bulletin board system. Online Investing by Susan Futterman Resources available online can help you make better investment decisions. This article focuses on using CompuServe for your online investment needs. COLUMNS The Inside Line Editorial Staff Columnist Michael A. Banks takes a candid look at "Online Low-Lifes and Other Electronic Creatures." Eye on America Online America Online is a great educational resource, and Columnist Julia Wilkinson takes you on a tour of AOL's impressive educational offerings. BIX Balliwicks Columnist Tom Smith introduces CONNECT readers to the BIX information service and its connection to the Internet. Connecting with CompuServe Columnist Jim Ness takes a look at company support areas on CompuServe, how forums get started, WinCIM for Windows, and travel-related areas on CIS. Telecomputing the DELPHI Way DTP and graphics support on DELPHI are the topics Columnist Dick Evans covers this issue. GEnie's Treasures Columnist Jim Mallory shows you how the gaming areas on GEnie can satisfy your needs. The Internet Gateway Columnist Paul Gilster shows you how to get the most from your Internet e-mail account, including how to FTP by mail. Staying Connected For About A Pound Wireless messaging using SkyTel's SkyStream is the focus of this issue's contribution from Columnist Marty Mankins. Clear To Send (CTS) PC Columnist Victor Volkman reviews PowerBBS for Windows, a full-featured Shareware package and the first Windows-based BBS. Dial M for Macintosh Columnist Ross Scott Rubin brings us the first of two columns focusing on AppleTalk Remote Access (ARA) and its potential uses and pitfalls for Macintosh modemers. CONNECT magazine is available at the following magazine outlets: B.Dalton Bookseller, Bookstop, Bookstar, Barnes & Noble, Doubleday, Scribner's, Crown Books, Tower Books, Little Professor, Lichtman's News and Books, Coles Book Stores, CompUSA, Computer City and Software Etc. chains, as well as other chains and independent newsstands, book stores and computer dealers in the U.S. and Canada. Call (313) 973-8825 to find the magazine dealer nearest you who carries CONNECT. CONNECT is a bi-monthly magazine covering the major commercial online services (such as America Online, BIX, CompuServe, DELPHI, GEnie and Prodigy), the Internet, and bulletin board system networks (such as Fidonet, WWIVnet, and GlobalNet). The magazine is platform-independent, with columns focusing on PC-specific (DOS and Windows), Macintosh- oriented, and Palmtop/PDA-related topics. Each issue also contains an editorial column by renowned telecomputing author Michael A. Banks. CONNECT currently has a bi-monthly circulation of 65,000. Patricia Snyder-Rayl | AOL: CONNECT |voice: (313) 973-8825 Man. Ed., CONNECT magazine | CIS: 70007,4640 | fax: (313) 973-0411 "The Modem User's Resource" | Delphi: UNICORNPUB | BBS: (313) 973-9137 ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #576 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa04394; 15 Aug 93 18:53 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA03698 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Sun, 15 Aug 1993 16:44:38 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA03682 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Sun, 15 Aug 1993 16:44:00 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 16:44:00 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308152144.AA03682@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #577 TELECOM Digest Sun, 15 Aug 93 16:44:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 577 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson LCI Intl Forms Alliance With STN Inc (Canada) For LD (Jason Sack) Need Info About a MITEL SX-20 (Jeff Moskow) Looking For X.PC Developers (Ajay Sanghi) 10xxx NOT Allowed on 1-800 (Paul Robinson) Call Signs (A. Padgett Peterson) Re: Leftover Drops (Gordon Torrie) Re: Leftover Drops (Christopher Zguris) Re: Caller ID Box With Serial Port From AT&T (Les Reeves) Re: 950 Calling Cards (Doug Rorem) Re: Area 205 to Split (Willard Dawson) Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal (Tony Zuccarino) Re: Interesting 800 Number Response (Jeff Wasilko) Re: Are we Being Ripped Off in New Zealand? (Tarl Neustaedter) Re: Continuing Saga (Bruce D. Nelson) Re: Sprint Workers Fed Up, Start Unionizing (Steven H. Lichter) Re: ANAC Codes by NPA (David Leibold) Re: Emergency TDD to Use 311 (Dave Niebuhr) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 12:02:05 -0400 From: tellab5!uunet!dcity!jsack@i88.isc.com (Jason Sack) Subject: LCI Intl Forms Alliance With STN Inc (Canada) For LD LCI to Form Alliance: {Globe and Mail}, Friday, August 13, 1993 Dublin, Ohio - LCI International Inc. plans to form a "strategic business alliance" with Canadian Long Distance telecommunications reseller STN Inc. (Smart Talk Network Inc.) LCI is to buy up to $16.75 million (U.S.) worth of convertible debentures in STN as well as a variety of support and information services to facilitate STN's continued rapid growth in the Canadian marketplace. The companies said that that they will form a seamless transborder network offering a full complement of business and residential services. LCI said it has certain rights to acquire a further ownership and establish a substantial position in STN. Details weren't disclosed. -------------- Jason Sack ------------------------------ From: jhm@ora.com (Jeff Moskow) Subject: Need Info About a MITEL SX-20 Organization: O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 19:27:13 GMT Hi, One of our customers gave us a MITEL-SX20 PBX with a ten button console. This system is about nine years old and is configured (we believe) for 24 lines/32 extensions. As far as we know this system is in working order, but alas we have no documentation on how to wire it up and MITEL wants many hundreds of dollars for the manuals. If anyone has any idea on how to set this up (or knows where I can find out), we'd appreciate and information. Please respond in email as I don't regularly get these newsgroups. Thanks very much, Jeff Moskow jeff@rtr.com ------------------------------ From: ajay@rahul.net (Ajay Sanghi) Subject: Looking For X.PC Developers Organization: a2i network Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 16:13:51 GMT Looking for X.PC Developers still pursuing with it's development. There used to be an X.PC developer's group. Is this group still there? Has X.PC been ported over to Windows and UNIX? Is it true that Lotus Notes uses scaled down version of X.PC? Please email me your replies. Thanks, Ajay Sanghi Tel: 408 984-7559, email: ajay@rahul.net ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 02:28:36 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM Subject: 10xxx NOT Allowed on 1-800 From: Paul Robinson Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA The other day at my office I needed to dial AT&T's switch on 1-800-321-0288, and by mistake I started to dial 10 as in a 10xxx code. Since 10xxx doesn't matter on 1-800, I figured I'd just keep dialing and it would be ignored. Part way through it 'supervised' or whatever you call the click that you get when the phone system has decided you've finished dialing. I tried the same thing on my home phone which is not a C&P Government Centrex and got the same result. I dialed: 10288 1 800 3210 and heard a 'click' indicating the switch had completed the connection. The recording I got said the call I made 'could not be reached with the carrier access code you dialed.' So I guess C&P is saying that AT&T gets its 1-800 service from MCI, perhaps? :) (They did, once.) :) In short, despite the fact that 10xxx codes are irrelevant for 1-800 numbers, you cannot dial a 10xxx code ahead of a 1-800 number in C&P Telephone area; the switch here will not allow it. Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM [Moderator's Note: Most exchanges in Chicago will not allow it either. If you do it, your call is bounced. You must dial without 10xxx. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 15 Aug 93 09:48:38 -0400 From: padgett@tccslr.dnet.mmc.com (A. Padgett Peterson) Subject: Call Signs Well, just ten miles from me is apropriately enough WGTO (540 AM Stereo -- sounds amazingly good if you have a stereo receiver, usual mush if not). The local station is not really well tuned in -- was asked by a DJ what the funny stripes on my Judge (who cares about the lawyers, I own a Judge 8*) were. For anyone who might share my interests, KGTO (1170 AM as I recall) is in Tulsa, OK where Tim Dye keeps them straight. Warmly, Padgett ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Leftover Drops From: gordon@torrie.org (Gordon Torrie) Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 00:49:19 -0400 Organization: Torrie Communications Services In volume 13, issue 559 the Moderator notes that pairs are multiplied between floors in old buildings in Chicago. Well, this also occurs in old buildings in Toronto too. I work in one five-story commercial building which has several tenants, all businesses. While there is no question about where customer premises wiring begins in this building, having pairs multiplied between floors causes no end to problems. The tenants aren't pleased to see a Bell Canada installer in the building because it almost guarantees that one of the tenants will lose one or more lines. The installers aren't particularly pleased either and especially not if they must be called back to correct a problem they created when installing additional service to one of the tenants. After my employer lost service on some of the trunks to the PBX for the second time, I typeset a sign reading "Please check for a ground-start trunk before you conclude the pair is unused" and posted it in each of the Bell phone "closets" I had access to. Installers who have worked here since then have said they think the reminder is a good idea, however it has not eliminated the problem. I believe that part of the problem is due to the age of the wiring. The worst example is one "closet" where I am afraid to open the door for fear that the various screw-terminal blocks and 66-blocks may fall out -- they aren't even attached to the wall! They are leaning against the door and hanging by their cables or are resting on top of the remains of a key system which is attached to the wall. Another part of the problem is that installers for POTS have nothing to do with digital services such as leased lines, Centrex Data (like AT&T's Switched 56) or ISDN and installers for digital services don't install POTS. Can one easily determine the difference between an unused pair and a pair used for Centrex Data or a leased line with only a buttset? Gord Torrie [Moderator's Note: We have bunches of those 'hanging by a thread' boxes here. Some of those old terminal cabinets are full of cockroaches and other bugs. One that sticks in my mind was a building on the north side which was an old hotel built in 1912. Next door to it (exactly up against it in fact) was another old hotel built in 1929. The feeder box from the street into the first building is a wooden box under a back stairway, with five or six long strips with screw terminals for the wires to each apartment. A little paper tag fastened with string on one of the strips said (kid you not!) "the pairs from binding post (some number, forget what) up to the end are multipled to the new building next door, but also pick these up at the Graymere across the street if the switchboard needs more service. Talk to the operator before you connect these." Written in an old-fashioned, very elegant handwriting and all. Signed by a 'J. Miller', dated May, 1929. The screw terminals were corroded so bad they could not be unfastened. Across the street in what had been the 'Graymere', the area in the lobby where the front desk and switch- board had been thirty years ago were mailboxes and behind the boxes in the room where the mailman goes to toss the mail another big wooden box -- the remains of the old switchboard system -- with a note saying certain pairs ran to the 'new building'. Someone had scratched that out and added a remark 'not anymore' dated October, 1963 which is apparently when the old switchboard was yanked. Fun, fun, fun! PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 15 Aug 93 01:59 GMT From: Christopher Zguris <0004854540@mcimail.com> Subject: Re: Leftover Drops I'm in New York City, and in a fairly modern apartment complex I used to live in the wiring was a 25 pair cable that ran up through apartments above each other (in other words, each verticle "row" of aparments had its own 25 pair), the cable bundle was located in the closet. When I wanted another line, I had to empty the closet (a VERY full closet mind you!) so they could have access because that is the demarc for them. They wired a network interface into an unused pair. The cable was slit in every apartment, so anyone with the time and inclination could probably tap in to all the active lines above and below their apartment. As far as scurity goes, it's obviously pretty thin. Later on, the building management installed an intercom system that worked through the phones in each apartmnent and when they did this they required the apartment phone numbers. How does this system work and since it's hooked up before the demarc who is responsible for it? Isn't it illegal to hook things up before the demarc (that's telco property/responsibilty right)? Christopher Zguris CZGURIS@MCIMail.com [Moderator's Note: Long story about front door intercom systems which work through phone lines. Some simply use a regular phone line to take dialed digits and translate them to the regular telephone number and dial it. Others take dialed digits and then jump on or camp on the associated house pair, splitting the CO line for a couple minutes while the front door caller is connected. I've got a file around here about it, and we've had this discussion before. Which system is better is a matter of preference and application. I've lived in buildings which had one of each kind (CO based and customer premises based.) PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 19:21:35 -0400 (EDT) From: LESREEVES@delphi.com Subject: Re: Caller ID Box with Serial Port from AT&T The ClassMate 10 was sold by Bell Atlantic and AT&T. It was manufactured by MHE Systems Corp. of Tustin, CA. They are no longer in business and the Class Mate is no longer manufactured. The Class Mate 10 was not a straight Bell type 202 device. It had firmware which formated the Caller ID packet into a bit more readable presentation. To the best of my knowledge, no Caller ID to RS-232 device available today uses the same format used by the Class Mate. Two sources for similar Caller ID to PC/RS-232 devices are: 1. ANI 232 Rochelle Communications Austin,TX 512.794.0088 or 800.542.8808 Minimum price for hardware+software: $ 250 2. Whozz Calling? Zeus Phonstuff Atlanta,GA 404.587.1541 Minimum price for hardware+software: $ 99 Also, the Rockwell Datapump chip for V.32bis modems includes Caller ID capability. To implement Caller ID the modem manufacturer must include some extra relays and other hardware. Not all modems built around the Rockwell Datapump include this feature. Some models of the Supra, Zycel and Practical Peripherals V.32 modems have Caller ID. ------------------------------ From: rorem@eecs.uic.edu (Doug Rorem) Subject: Re: 950 Calling Cards Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 13:38:06 GMT > Something you might want to investigate is utilizing a smaller > interexchange carrier for your 950 traffic. From my investigation of > feature group B service offerings in Nebraska, I discovered that the > large carriers typically seem uninterested in residential 950 access > (and typically don't have products for it). Metromedia (formerly ITT) also offers 950 service (their number is 950-0ITT [950-0488]). Their customer service # is 800-275-0200. I'm not associated with them in any way except being a satisfied customer. Doug Rorem University of Illinois at Chicago ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Area 205 to Split From: dawson@willard.atl.ga.us (Willard Dawson) Date: Sun, 15 Aug 93 11:37:51 EDT Organization: Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814 rsiatl!turner@rsiatl.UUCP writes: > Carl Moore writes: >> I don't have this in front of me: is there a 205-334 exchange >> anywhere? Are there any local calls across the future 205/334 >> boundary? > Sorry I took so long to respond. 334 acording to some SCB info I got > a while back is actually in Georgetown, GA, a small town just across > the river from Eufaula, AL. That is 912-334, a 5E in that actually is in Eufala, despite the fact that it serves a piece of Georgia. There is 615-334 in Decatur, TN. There is no 205-334 in SCB-AL territory, but there could be in some of the other local Alabama BOCs, I suppose (unfortunately, my copy of this data is incomplete ...). dawson@willard.atl.ga.us (Willard Dawson) gatech!kd4nc!vdbsan!willard!dawson emory!uumind!willard!dawson Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814 ------------------------------ From: Tony.Zuccarino@nb.rockwell.com (Tony Zuccarino) Subject: Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal Organization: Rockwell International Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 01:07:46 GMT In article , bill@attmail.com wrote: > [[Don't be fooled by where I work. I don't know nuthin bout buzzin no > busies!]] > I have a recollection of reading/hearing somewhere that a lot of > thought and research went into the sound they chose for the ringer on > a phone. The puzzle to solve was an optimization between using a > sound urgent enough to make you want to answer pronto and not using a > sound so annoying that you wouldn't want a phone. (My scrambled > recollection of this may be confusing the original bells with today's > popular electronic warblers.) > It wouldn't surprise me to hear that the busy signal was chosen in a > similar way. After all, since the billing model is that you don't pay > for busy calls in the US, the phone company wants you to give up as > soon as you know it's a busy. Where can one get ahold of the 'thought and research' that went into some of the characteristics of the POTS service? I would be interested in hearing the tradeoffs made as decisions were cast on the user interface to the switched network. Tony Zuccarino Marketing Rockwell International tony.zuccarino@nb.rockwell.com [Moderator's Note: Well, you know the only reason we hear a ringing signal from the other end is so that people will be assured their call is being processed rather than ignored. The ring we hear in our ear has nothing to do with the ring being given on the other end via the phone bell; but if telco did not provide a ringing signal back to the caller, many people would think that the phone was out of order. That is the truth, seriously. No reason at all to provide a 'ringing sig- nal to the caller which has no relationship to the signal given the called party other than to placate or humor the caller. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 15 Aug 93 00:23:15 PDT From: jeffw@triple-i.com (Jeff Wasilko) Subject: Re: Interesting 800 Number Response > what would happen) I got, "We're sorry, your call could not be > completed. 213-xxx" ... the first message, interestingly enough, was > the same female voice that seems to do all of the "Thank you for > calling Pacific Bell" recordings when you call the phone*company here. > Anyone know what this was? A Pacific*Bell service? No, more than likely an AT&T service. As I recall, AT&T offers a service where they will play a stock message on your 800 number during certain hours or days. It seems that AT&T and many of the BOCs use the same person/people to do the recordings. Jeff Wasilko, Information International +1 617 275 7070 Application Support Specialist [Moderator's Note: They all used that nice lady from down in Atlanta for many years. Maybe some still do. PAT] ------------------------------ From: tarl@persian.sw.stratus.com (Tarl Neustaedter) Subject: Re: Are we Being Ripped Off in New Zealand? Date: 15 Aug 1993 04:02:43 GMT Organization: Stratus Computer, Marlboro MA In article jonathan.mosen@OOSIGHT.N ACJACK.GEN.NZ (Jonathan Mosen) writes: > He claimed that it would be possible for a call to be made > from New Zealand to Hawaii for 25 cents a day. That's about 40 US > cents. > [...] I'd like to hear some opinions from the experts in > the Digest as to whether we're all being ripped off, or whether this > Australian's analysis was too simplistic. That figure has got to be WAAAAYY off. For $0.40/channel/day, your cable-laying costs have to be on the order of $170/km per fully-subscribed T3 link. If you can lay a lot of T3 links in the same cable (and find buyers for the bandwidth), you can let that cost balloon -- for example, at 20 T3 links in the cable, you can spend about $3400/km. But selling more than 10,000 NZ-Hawaii channels (continuous use, to make the $0.40/day) could be hard -- I'd be VERY surprised if that much long distance traffic existed on that line. 10,000 international calls/day, I can believe. But not 240,000 call-hours/day. If you're interested in my back-of-the-envelope calculations for the above; The cable cost has to be paid up front. Assume you sell 20-year bonds at 7% interest to pay for the cable. Then: $0.40 * 672 channels/T3 = $268.8/day/T3 = $8064/month/T3. $8064/month pays the interest on $1.3M at 7%/year. $1.3M/8000km = $173/km. And you still have to add in costs to maintain and power the cable, not to mention administrative overhead, which means the cable cost has to drop even further to match that $0.40/channel/day. I'd be surprised if $100/km/T3 is within an order of magnitude. Depending on how many T3 links you stuff in the cable, I'd be impressed at $10,000/km/T3. There is no question that current international long-distance is too expensive (witness that USA-to-anywhere is almost always cheaper than anywhere-to-USA), but $0.40/channel/day is a pipe dream. For comparison, I just priced what it will cost me in phone charges to get an internet feed. The closest commercial provider is in Hudson, MA (I live in Ashland MA, about 15 miles away). NYNEX standard rates are $0.31+$0.11/minute. Note, this is walking distance, not 8000km of liquid hostility. By paying an additional $20/month (already nearly double the $0.40/day), I can get my ashland-hudson rate reduced to about $0.052/minute. Oh, by the way, I think Massachusetts local rates are too high as well -- but I don't expect to live long enough to see them fall to $0.40/day. Tarl Neustaedter tarl@sw.stratus.com (until Aug 20) New address under construction ------------------------------ From: aa789@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bruce D. Nelson) Subject: Re: Continuing Saga Date: 15 Aug 1993 04:12:05 GMT Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA) Reply-To: aa789@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bruce D. Nelson) As you may recall, I have been locked in a continuing dialog with Rochester Telephone concerning my two lines, one which could carry v.32/42 calls, and one which couldn't, and despite switching all the copper from the house to the CO, and even swapping lines, nothing changed. I got as far as talking to the the supervisor who is in charge of the switch who did everything possible except swapping out line cards (which he would need a work order for). Still no resolution. I was suppose to call someone next week for that permission, etc. Well, just as suddenly as the problem appeared on June 23rd, the problem resolved itself without the help of the phone company this evening. I'm sure I'll have some interesting conversations with all the telco people who are working on the problem, when I tell them the problem just "went away". I'd like to thank all of you who posted suggestions and/or emailed help with my problem. The insight into the innards of a telco were quite helpful. Bruce Nelson (posting from an alternate account) [Moderator's Note: With telco, problems tend to 'just go away' since no one will admit to screwing up in the first place and no one will admit to fixing things. You are only a customer, after all, what would you know about anything? :) PAT] ------------------------------ From: co057@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steven H. Lichter) Subject: Re: Sprint Workers Fed Up, Start Unionizing Date: 15 Aug 1993 04:58:28 GMT Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA) I seem to remember where AT&T and their unions came to an agreement on monitorin. Centel which is part of Sprint also had some problems like that. I believe GTE monitors as do most and the customers are warned about it, but I don't know to what extent. Many years ago I was on limited duty and worked in the office where a lot of customer calls came in and I don't remember ever being monitored. Later on I saw equipment in the basement of an office and was told it was for monitoring. Steven H. Lichter GTECalif COEI ------------------------------ From: djcl@io.org (woody) Subject: Re: ANAC Codes by NPA Date: 15 Aug 1993 06:18:27 GMT Organization: Internex Online - Toronto, Canada (416) 363-3783 In article LESREEVES@delphi.com writes: > Area Code / ANAC # to dial Area Code / ANAC # to dial I should point out that a similar list was posted a few weeks ago... >401 / 222-2222 403 / 908-222-2222 ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Alberta tends to use 311 or 999 - the 908- number may have been for another area. David Leibold ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 15 Aug 93 07:14:19 EDT From: dwn@dwn.ccd.bnl.gov (Dave Niebuhr) Subject: Re: Emergency TDD to Use 311 In TELECOM Digest V13 #575 Curtis E. Reid writes: > I saw an article in today's {Democrat and Chronicle} (Rochester, NY > August 14, 1993): > Begin Excerpt: > Rochester Tel, other firms plan > emergency TDD number for deaf > Curtis E. Reid CER2520@ritvax.isc.rit.edu > Rochester Institute of Technology/NTID REID@DECUS.org (DECUS) > 52 Lomb Memorial Drive 716.475.6089 TDD/TT 475.6895 Voice > Rochester, NY 14623-5604 U.S.A. 716.475.6500 Fax (Business Use Only) I left the .sig in for a purpose. TDD for the deaf to use in emergencies is an *excellent* idea. Now that the deaf are mainstreaming into the hearing community in expanding numbers, some method must be done to insure that the deaf can reach the emergency services if they are required. The recent discussions about Alexander Graham Bell and his wife and now the referenced post will hopefully enlighten some to take advantage of the work that the deaf can do, if just given half of a chance. Since 1978, I have worked with at least four graduates of the NTID on a full-time basis and I don't remember how many summer students, and it has been a rewarding experience and one that I'm proud to have. I would like to ask Curtis to explain the mission of the NTID to the readership so that they can learn about this very valuable school. For those not familiar with the NTID, the name is National Technical Institute for the Deaf. Another school that can provide employers with excellent employees is Gallaudet University in Washington, D.C. Almost all of the students there are deaf. Sorry for all the plugs, but as I said, I have had a very rewarding experience working with the deaf over the years. Dave Niebuhr Internet: niebuhr@bnl.gov / Bitnet: niebuhr@bnl Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, LI, NY 11973 (516)-282-3093 Senior Technical Specialist: Scientific Computer Facility ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #577 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa04501; 15 Aug 93 19:25 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA04418 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Sun, 15 Aug 1993 17:18:33 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA04411 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Sun, 15 Aug 1993 17:17:55 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 17:17:55 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308152217.AA04411@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@delta.eecs.nwu.edu Subject: From Arpanet to Usenet In an issue of the Digest earlier today, portions of a dialogue between Ronda Hauben and someone else was printed, submitted by a reader who thought it was interesting, as I did also. It so happens I have a longer article by Ms. Hauben which arrived here a few days ago that I was planning on running over the weekend, so the two compliment each other quite well. Check out her article earlier today in the Digest in case you missed it. When part two of her history is prepared, I hope she will send it to us. PAT From: ronda@umcc.umcc.umich.edu (Ronda Hauben) Subject: Draft: From Arpanet to Usenet Date: 11 Aug 1993 06:48:09 GMT Organization: UMCC, Ann Arbor, MI (Draft for Comment) The Development of the International Computer Network: From Arpanet to Usenet News (On the Nourishment or Impediment of the NET_Commonwealth) by Ronda Hauben email: au329@cleveland.freenet.edu "The method I take...is not yet very usual; for instead of using only comparative and superlative words, and intellectual arguments, I have taken the course (as a Specimen of the Political Arithmethic I have long aimed at) to express myself in terms of Number, Weight, or Measure; to use only arguments of Sense, and to consider only such Causes, as have visible Foundations in Nature; leaving those that depend upon the mutable Minds, Opinions, Appetites, and Passions of particular Men, to the Conservation of others." --Sir William Petty "Political Arithmetic" "The Nutrition of a Commonwealth consisteth, in the Plenty, and the Distribution of Materials, Condusive to Life." --Thomas Hobbes, "The Leviathan" Preface In the 1600's Sir William Petty, who has been called the father of Scientific Political Economy, pioneered the development of what he called "Political Arithmethic."(1) Political Arithmethic was the application of the scientific method elaborated by Sir Francis Bacon and others of the 16th and 17th century to the problems of the economy of a nation. Political Arithmetic involved the gathering of data distinguished by Number, Weight, or Measure to determine the factors which contribute to the material well being of the people of a society and those which were the impediments to the production of social wealth. Petty only considered those causes which "have a visible Foundation in Nature" and discarded those that were dependent on "the mutable minds, opinions, appetites, and passions of particular men." The International Global network is one of the surprising developments of our time. What are the factors that supported and nourished the growth and development of this network and what are the impediments to continued development and expansion. Introduction Today there is an international computer network that spans the globe and connects universities, researchers and computer workers and users around the world.(2) Twenty five years ago these developments were nonexistent. This is "the largest machine that man has ever constructed, the international global network."(3) This significant world development has occurred in the past 25 years and though it has involved millions of people around the world, others who are not participants in this exciting new global computer community know practically nothing of its existence. This global network is accomplished by, and makes possible, a high degree of automation. Society can now provide for more of the needs of people with comparatively less labor than ever before. Probably one of the most important examples of the promise of this new technology is the creation and expansion of a users news network called Usenet News. Usenet reaches three to six million people worldwide with over 3,500 different newsgroup subjects and millions of bytes of articles. This news uses no paper, no glue, no postage. Yet, this technology makes it possible for the users themselves to determine and provide for the content and range of information that is conveyed via this new news medium.(4) It also makes possible the rapid response and discussion of articles posted and provides a forum where issues can be freely debated and information exchanged. This news provides for the information exchange and learning needed by the system administrators, programmers, engineers, scientists, and users. In turn, they contribute to the network's development. The continuing growth of Usenet News is a tribute to the millions of pioneers who have developed this new technology of computer automation. J.C.L. Licklider is one of the early network pioneers. His vision of an Intergalactic Computer Network helped to inspire these developments. He and Albert Vezza, describing an earlier network advance, wrote, "Shakespeare could have been foreseeing the present situation in information networking when he said, `...What's past is prologue; what's to come, in yours and my discharge"(5) The story of the network's growth and development contains important lessons for its continued expansion. The development of this international network linking millions of people around the world now stands at a turning point. Will it continue to go forward or will it be detoured? An understanding of the environment and policies that nourished the development of the network provides a scientific foundation on which to base its further development and to serve its continued contribution to the NET_Commonwealth. Part I - The Development of the Arpanet In 1962, the report "On Distributed Communications" by Paul Baran, was published by the Rand Corporation. Baran's research, done under a grant from the U.S. Air Force, discusses how the U.S. military could protect its communications systems from serious attack. He outlines the principle of "redundancy of connectivity" and explores various models of forming communications systems and evaluating their vulnerability.(6) The report proposes a communications system where there would be no obvious central command and control point, but all surviving points would be able to reestablish contact in the event of an attack on any one point. Thus damage to a part would not destory the whole and its effect on the whole would be minimized. One of his recommendations is for a national public utility to transport computer data, much in the way the telephone system transports voice data. "Is it time now to start thinking about a new and possibly non-existant public utility," Baran asks, "a common user digital data communication plant designed specifically for the transmission of digital data among a large set of subscribers?"(7) He cautions against limiting the choice of technology for such a data network to that which is currently in use. He proposes that a packet switching, store and forward technology be developed for a data network. However, because some of his research was then classified, it did not get very wide dissemination. Other researchers were interested in computers and communications, particularly in the computer as a communication device. J.C.R. Licklider was one of the most influential. He was particularly interested in the man-computer communication relationship. Lick, as he asked people to call him, wondered how the computer could help humans to think and to solve problems. In an article called "Man Computer Symbiosis", he explores how the computer could help humans to do intellectual work. Lick was also interested in the question of how the computer could help humans to communicate better.(8) "In a few years men will be able to communicate more effectively through a machine than face to face," Licklider and Robert Taylor wrote in an article they coauthored. "When minds interact," they observe, "new ideas emerge."(9) People like Paul Baran and J.C.R. Licklider were involved in proposing how to develop computer technology in ways that hadn't been developed before. While Baran's work had been classified, and thus was known only around military circles, Licklider, who had access to such military research and writing, was also involved in the computer research and education community. Larry Roberts, another of the pioneers involved in the early days of network research, explains how Lick's vision of an Intergalactic Computer Network changed his life and career. Lick's contribution, Roberts explains, represented the effort to "define the problems and benefits resulting from computer networking."(10) After informal conversations with Lick, F. Corbato and A. Perlis, at the Second Congress on Information System Sciences in Hot Springs, Virginia, in November 1964, Larry Roberts "concluded that the most important problem in the computer field before us at the time was computer networking; the ability to access one computer from another easily and economically to permit resource sharing." Roberts recalls, "That was a topic in which Licklider was very interested and his enthusiasm infected me."(11) During the early 1960's the U.S. military under its Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) established two new funding offices, the Information Processing Technology Office (IPTO) and another for behavioral science. From 1962-64, Licklider took a leave of absence from his position at a Massachusetts research firm, BBN, to give guidance to these two newly created offices. In reviewing this seminal period, Alan Perlis recalls how Lick's philosophy guided ARPA's funding of computer science research. Perlis explains, "I think that we all should be grateful to ARPA for not focusing on very specific projects such as workstations. There was no order issued that said, `We want a proposal on a workstation.' Goodness knows, they would have gotten many of them. Instead, I think that ARPA, through Lick, realized that if you get `n' good people together to do research on computing, you're going to illuminate some reasonable fraction of the ways of proceeding because the computer is such a general instrument." In retrospect Perlis explains, "We owe a great deal to ARPA for not circumscribing directions that people took in those days. I like to believe that the purpose of the military is to support ARPA, and the purpose of ARPA is to support research."(12) Licklider confirms that he was guided in his philosophy by the rationale that a broad investigation of a problem was necessary in order to solve that problem. He explains "There's a lot of reason for adopting a broad delimination rather than a narrow one because if you're trying to find out where ideas come from, you don't want to isolate yourself from the areas that they come from." (13) Licklider attracted others involved in computer research to his vision that computer networking the most important challenge. In 1966-67 Lincoln Labs in Lexington, Mass and SDR in Santa Monica, California, got a grant from the DOD to begin research on linking computers across the continent. Larry Roberts, describing this work, explains, "Convinced that it was a worthwhile goal, we set up a test network to see where the problems would be. Since computer time sharing experiments at MIT (CTSS) and Dartmouth (DTSS) had demonstrated that it was possible to link different computer users to a single computer, the cross country experiment built on this advance."(i.e. Once timesharing was possible, the linking remote computers was also possible.)(14) Roberts reports that there was no trouble linking dissimilar computers. The problems, he claims, were with the telephone lines across the continent, i.e. that the throughput was inadequate to accomplish their goals. Thus their experiment set the basis for justifying research in setting up a nationwide store and forward packet switching data network. During this period, ARPA was funding computer research at a number of U.S. Universities and research labs. A decision was made to include research contractors in the experimental network -- the Arpanet. A plan was created for a working network to link the 16 research groups together. A plan for the ARPANET was made available at the October 1967 ACM Symposium on Operating Principles in Gatlingberg, Tennessee. (15) Shortly thereafter, Larry Roberts was recruited to head the ITPO office at ARPA to guide the research. The military set out specifications for the project and asked for bids. They wanted a proposal for a four computer network and a design for a network that would include 17 sites. The award for the contract went to the Cambridge, Massachusetts firm Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. (BBN). The planned network would make use of mini computers to serve as switching nodes for the host computers at sites that were to be connected to the network. Honeywell mini computers (516's) were chosen for the network of Information Message Processors (IMP's) that would be linked to each other. And each of the IMP's would be linked to a host computer. These IMP's only had 12 kilobytes of memory though they were the most powerful mini computers available at the time. The opening stanzas of a poem by Vint Cerf, an Arpanet pioneer, describe these early days of networking(16): Like distant islands sundered by the sea, We had no sense of one community. We lived and worked apart and rarely knew that others searched with us for knowledge, too. Distant ARPA spurred us in our quest and for our part we worked and put to test new thoughts and theories of computing art; we deemed it science not, but made a start Each time a new machine was built and sold, we'd add it to our list of needs and told our source of funds "Alas! Our knowledge loom will halt 'til it's in our computer room. But, could these new resources not be shared? Let links be built; machines and men be paired! Let distance be no barrier! They set that goal: design and build the ARPANET! On Sept 1, 1969, the first IMP arrived at UCLA which was to be the first site of the new network. It was connected to the Sigma 7 computer at UCLA. Shortly thereafter IMP's were delivered to the other three sites in this initial testbed network. At SRI, the IMP was connected to an SDS-940 computer. At UCSB, the IMP was connected to an IBM 360/75. And at the University of Utah, the fourth site, the IMP was connected a DEC PDP-10. By the end of 1969, the first four IMP's had been connected to the computers at their individual sites and the network connections between the IMP's were operational. The researchers and scientists involved could begin to identify the problems they had to solve to develop a working network.(6) There were programming and technical problems to be solved so the different computers would be able to communicate with each other. Also, there was a need for an agreed upon set of signals that would open up communication channels, allow data to pass thru, and then would close the channels. These agreed upon standards were called protocols. The initial proposal for the research required those involved to work to establish protocols. In April 1969, the first meeting of the group to discuss establishing these protocols took place. They put together a set of documents that would be available to everyone involved for consideration and discussion. They called these Requests for Comment (RFC's) and the first RFC was April, 1969.(17) As the problems of setting up the four computer network were identified and solved, the network was expanded to several more sites. (18) By April 1971, there were 15 nodes and 23 hosts in the network. These earliest sites attached to the network were connected to Honeywell DDP-516 IMPs. These were: 1 UCLA 2 SRI 3 UCSB 4 U of UTAH 5 BBN 6 MIT 7 RAND Corp 8 SDC ? (Systems Development Corporation) 9 Harvard 10 Lincoln Lab 11 Stanford 12 U of Illinois (Urbana) 13 Case Western Reserve U. 14 CMU 15 NASA-AMES Then smaller minicomputers, the Honeywell 316, were introduced. They were compatible with the 516 IMP but at half the cost) were connected. Some were configured as TIPs (i.e. Terminal IMPs) beginning with: 16 NASA-AMES TIP 17 MITRE TIP (Listing of sites based on a post on Usenet, but the Completion Report also lists Burroughs as one of the first 15 sites.) By January 1973, there were 35 nodes of which 15 were TIPs. Early in 1973, a satellite link connected California with a TIP in Hawaii. With the rapid increase of network traffic, problems were discovered with the reliability of the subnet and corrections had to be worked on. In mid 1973, Norway and England in Europe were added to the net and the resulting problems had to be solved. By September 1973, there were 40 nodes and 45 hosts on the network. And the traffic had expanded from 1 million packets/day in 1972 to 2,900,000 packets/day by September, 1973. By 1977, there were 111 host computers connected via the Arpanet. By 1983 there were 4000.(20) As the network was put into operation, the researchers learned which of their original assumptions and models were inaccurate. For example, BBN describes how they had initially failed to understand that the IMP's would need to do error checking. They explain: "The first four IMPs were developed and installed on schedule by the end of 1969. No sooner were these IMPs in the field than it became clear that some provision was needed to connect hosts relatively distant from an IMP (i.e., up to 2000 feet instead of the expected 50 feet). Thus in early 1970 a `distant' IMP/host interface was developed. Augmented simply by heftier line drivers, these distant interfaces made clear for the first time the fallacy in the assumption that had been made that no error control was needed on the host/IMP interface because there would be no errors on such a local connection."(21) The network was needed to uncover the actual bugs. In describing the importance of a test network, rather than trying to do the research in a laboratory, Alex McKenzie and David Walden, in their article "Arpanet, the Defense Data Network, and Internet" write: "Errors in coding control were another problem. However carefully one designs, codes, and performs quality control, errors can still slip through. Fortunately, with a large number of IMPs in the network, most of these errors are found quickly because they occur so frequently. For instance, a bug in an IMP code that occurs once a day in one IMP, occurs every 15 minutes in a 100-IMP network. Unfortunately, some bugs still will remain. If a symptom of a bug is detected somewhere in a 100-IMP network once a week (often enough to be a problem), then it will happen only once every two years in a single IMP in a development lab for a programmer trying to find the source of the symptom. Thus, achieving a totally bug-free network is very difficult.(22) In October 1972, the First International Conference on Computer Communications was held in Washington, D.C. A public demonstration of the ARPANET was given setting up an actual node with 40 machines. Representatives from projects around the world including Canada, France, Japan, Norway, Sweden, Great Britain and the U.S. discussed the need to begin work on establishing agreed upon protocols. The InterNetwork Working Group (INWG) was created to begin discussions for such a common protocol and Vinton Cerf, who was involved with UCLA Arpanet was chosen as the first Chairman. The vision proposed for the architectural principles for an international interconnection of networks was "a mess of independent, autonomous networks interconnected by gateways, just as independent circuits of ARPANET are interconnected by IMPs."(23) The network continued to grow and expand. In 1975 the ARPANET was transferred to the control of the DCA (Defense Communications Agency). Evaluating the success of ARPANET research, Licklider recalled that he felt ARPA had been run by an enlightened set of military men while he was involved with it. "I don't want to brag about ARPA," he explains, " It is in my view, however, a very enlightened place. It was fun to work there. I think I never encountered brighter, more creative people, than the inhabitants of the third floor E-ring of the Pentagon. But that, I'll say, was a long time ago, and I simply don't know how bright and likeable they are now. But ARPA didn't constrain me much."(24) A post on Usenet by Eugene Miya, who was a student at one of the early Arpa sites, conveys the exciting environment of the early Arpanet. He writes: "It was an effort to connect different kinds of computers back when a school or company had only one (that's 1) computer. The first configuration of the ARPAnet had only 4 computers, I had luckily selected a school at one of those 4 sites: UCLA/Rand Corp, UCSB (us), SRI, and the U of Utah. Who? The US DOD: Defense Department's Advanced Research Projects Agency. ARPA was the sugar daddy of computer science. Some very bright people were given some money, freedom, and had a lot of vision. It not only started computer networks, but also computer graphics, computer flight simulation, head mounted displays, parallel processing, queuing models, VLSI, and a host of other ideas. Far from being evil warmongers, some neat work was done. Why? Lots of reasons: intellectual curiosity, the need to have different machines communicate, study fault tolerance of communications systems in the event of nuclear war, share and connect expensive resources, very soft ideas to very hard ideas ... I first saw the term "internetwork" in a paper by folk from Xerox PARC (another ARPANET host). The issue was one of interconnecting Ethernets (which had the 256 [slightly less] host limitation). Schoch's CACM worm program paper is a good one. I learned much of this with the help of the NIC (Network Information Center). This does not mean the Internet is like this today. I think the early ARPAnet was kind of a wondrous neat place, sort of a golden era. You could get into other people's machines with a minimum of hassle (someone else paid the bills). No more.... He continues: Where did I fit in? I was a frosh nuclear engineering major, spending odd hours (2am-4am, sometimes on Fridays and weekends) doing hackerish things rather than doing student things: studying or dating, etc. I put together an interactive SPSS and learned a lot playing chess on an MIT[- MC] DEC-10 from an IBM-360. Think of the problems: 32-bit versus 36-bit, different character set [remember I started with EBCDIC], FTP then is largely FTP now, has changed very little. We didn't have text editors available to students on the IBM (yes you could use the ARPAnet via punched card decks). Learned a lot. I wish I had hacked more.(25) One of the surprising developments to the researchers of the ARPANET was the great popularity of electronic mail. Analyzing the reasons for this unanticipated benefit from their network development, Licklider and Vezza write, "By the fall of 1973, the great effectiveness and convenience of such fast, informed messages services...had been discovered by almost everyone who had worked on the development of the ARPANET -- and especially by the then Director of ARPA, S.J. Lukasik, who soon had most of his office directors and program managers communicating with him and with their colleagues and their contractors via the network. Thereafter, both the number of (intercommunicating) electronic mail systems and the number of users of them on the ARPANET increased rapidly."(26) "One of the advantages of the message system over letter mail," they add, "was that, in an ARPANET message, one could write tersely and type imperfectly, even to an older person in a superior position and even to a person one did not know very well, and the recipient took no offense. The formality and perfection that most people expect in a typed letter did not become associated with network messages, probably because the network was so much faster, so much more like the telephone ... Among the advantages of the network message services over the telephone were the fact that one could proceed immediately to the point without having to engage in small talk first, that the message services produced a preservable record, and that the sender and receiver did not have to be available at the same time.(27) Describing email, the authors of the Completion Report write: The largest single surprise of the ARPANET program has been the incredible popularity and success of network mail. There is little doubt that the techniques of network mail developed in connection with the ARPANET program are going to sweep the country and drastically change the techniques used for intercommunication in the public and private sectors.(28) Not only was the network used to see what the actual problems would be, the communication it made possible gave the researchers the ability to collaborate to deal with these problems. Summarizing the important breakthrough represented by the Arpanet, they conclude: "This ARPA program has created no less than a revolution in computer technology and has been one of the most successful projects ever undertaken by ARPA. The program has initiated extensive changes in the Defense Department's use of computers as well as in the use of computers by the entire public and private sectors, both in the United States and around the world. Just as the telephone, the telegraph, and the printing press had far-reaching effects on human intercommunication, the widespread utilization of computer networks which has been catalyzed by the ARPANET project represents a similarly far-reaching change in the use of computers by mankind. The full impact of the technical changes set in motion by this project may not be understood for many years."(29) Notes for Part I: (1) "The Writings of Sir William Petty," ed Hull, London, 1899, reprint edition Kelley Publishers. (2) "Internet Society News," vol 1, no. 2, Spring, 1992, back inside cover. (3) Ithiel de Sola Pool, "Technologies Without Boundaries," Cambridge, 1990, p. 56. (4) See for example, Michael Hauben, "Social Forces Behind the Development of Usenet News," The Amateur Computerist, vol 5, no. 1-2. (5) "Applications of Information Network", Proceedings of the IEEE, vol 66, No. 11, November, 1978, p.57. (6) Ibid., September, 1962, pg. 2. (7) Ibid., p. 40. (8) "Man Computer Symbiosis", in "In Memoriam: J.C.R. Licklider 1915-1990." (9) See "The Computer as a Communication device" in "In Memoriam:J.C.R. Licklider 1915-1990", p. 21. (10) See "The Arpanet and Computer Networks" reprinted in "A History of Personal Workstations" ed by Adele Goldberg, N.Y. 1988, p. 143. (11) Ibid., p. 143-144. See also "The Arpanet and Computer Networks," Ibid. (12) "Workstations", Ibid., p. 129. (13) "Some Reflections on Early History," Ibid., p. 118) (14) See for example, "Toward a Cooperative Network of Time-Shared Computers," by Thomas Marill and Lawrence G. Roberts, Proceedings - FJCC, 1966, p. 426. (15) Roberts, p. 146. (16) From "Requiem for the Arpanet" by Vint Cerf reprinted in "ConneXions," vol 3, no. 10, Oct. 1989, p.27. (17) See "The Completion Report," by F. Heart, A. McKenzie, J. McQuillian, and D. Walden, BBN Report 4799, January 4, 1978. (18) Ibid. (19) Joel Levin on Oct. 17, 1990. (20) See "Completion Report" and "Arpanet, the Defense Data Network, and Internet" in the "Froehlich/Kent Encyclopedia of Telecommuni- cations," vol 1. (21) "The Completion Report," p. III-55. (22) See "Completion Report" and "Arpanet, the Defense Data Network, and Internet" in the "Froehlich/Kent Encyclopedia of Telecommunications," vol 1, p 361. (23) Ibid. p. 361-2. (24) "Workstations," p. 126. (25) From Eugene Miya in alt.folklore.computers, comp.misc, Re: Internet: The origins, Oct 16 1990. (26) "Applications", p. 44. (27) Ibid. (28) "Completion Report", III, p. 113-116. (29) Ibid., I, p. 2. Ronda Hauben write for email copy of Winter/Spring 1993 issue Amateur Computerist articles include Interview on Usenet and C News ronda@umcc.umich.edu Sir Francis Bacon and Shorter Hours Bill or ae547@yfn.ysu.edu Social Forces behind Usenet News   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa05172; 15 Aug 93 23:27 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA07798 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Sun, 15 Aug 1993 21:12:15 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA07818 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Sun, 15 Aug 1993 21:11:40 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 21:11:40 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308160211.AA07818@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #578 TELECOM Digest Sun, 15 Aug 93 21:11:30 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 578 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Some Thoughts About the Telecom Archives (TELECOM Moderator) Video Conference Standards (John Humm) Looking For PC Voicemail Card (Jeffrey J. Radice) Trans-Oceanic Cable Costs (was About New Zealand) (Danny Burstein) Online FCC Regulations? (Andrew Benson) Attleboro or South Attleboro (Carl Moore) Re: Dial N'CERF (Pushpendra Mohta) Re: Radar and Acronyms (Ehud Gavron) Re: Cellular Conversation Results in Arrest (Gary Breuckman) Re: CPSR and the NII (Glenn R. Stone) Re: What is Category 5? (Re: ISDN) (Fred R. Goldstein) FNB, the Post Office and Me (TELECOM Moderator) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 21:00:32 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Subject: Some Thoughts About the Telecom Archives People ask me about the archives, and how they can be accessed by users without Internet/FTP connections. Email servers are one way, but that can be long and very cumbersome, especially for a UUCP site. I have talked with folks who wanted to consider the possibility of putting it all on CD Rom ... nothing has developed from that either. What I am thinking about now is putting the whole thing on diskettes, the little 3 1/2 inch kind which hold 1.44 megs each. By my best estimate, there would be about 65 such diskettes. The contents would be arranged logically so that each diskette held certain files of the same type. For example, one diskette might contain all the issues from 1 to X, the next next diskette would have all the issues from X to Y, etc. Another diskette would contain the area code files, and so forth. A printed index could describe in detail what all the diskettes had on them, and people could order these for the cost of duplication and mailing, etc. Either you could order the whole set (and there would be updates as needed; additional diskettes as new back issues of the Digest were accumulated) or you could order individual diskettes with the desired files only, etc. I am thinking also that the only way I am going to get a reliable, dialup, easy to use service for the Archives is by putting it up myself, and for that purpose I could obtain an old computer I think with a 100 meg hard drive, a copy of Procomm, and a phone line. Trouble is, the only spare modem would be one at 2400 baud, and that would be a slow process. Now I am willing to work on either of these solutions -- and a solution is needed if my mail is any indication from people asking for help in getting files -- but I would like to know which way the readership feels is best. If someone has a method of mass-producing the diskettes they would let me use, this would be wonderful. Or, a modem adequate to move stuff *fast* over a phone line would also be good. I'd like to make the Archives a more useful resource for the general public -- meaning the many of you who cannot use FTP or Gopher -- but I'm not sure what to do. Can we have a discussion on it please? If the Archives were copied onto diskettes, how many of you would want them? Would larger five inch diskettes be better? I have more or less decided against CD Rom because the people who approached me were all in it strictly for the commercial aspects, and although I need money also, I really do not want to put a big price tag on this. I want everyone to be able to afford it who wants collections of back issues, etc. Let me know your feelings. Patrick Townson ------------------------------ From: humm@Count.secapl.com (John Humm) Subject: Video Conference Standards Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 16:14:41 GMT Organization: Security APL, Inc. We have received proposals from Picture Tel and Compression Labs. Both organization appear to be using a propritary video compression standard as the preferred transmission link. Question: What is the video communication standard? Do the products from both of these organization support this standard communication? What are the advantages of the propritary video comprssion as comparred to the standard? Our objective is to do video conferencing between two offices of our organization using two 56kb dialup circuts. Most of video conferencing will be by small groups staff members for training, project meeting, staff meetings, interviewing, and marketing presentations. Anybody care to comment on the suitability of this equipment for the above purposes. Picture Tel is the system 150 model 50. Compression labs is the Elispe system. You can e-mail me direct at humm@secapl.com. Thanks in advance. ------------------------------ From: jjr@wixer.bga.com (Jeffrey J. Radice) Subject: Looking For PC Voicemail Card Organization: Real/Time Communications Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 20:42:49 GMT I'm attempting to set up a friend's business for voicemail using his computer, so he doesn't have the overhead of paying a service for the same. I am not entirely familiar with the hardware, and software required to do such a feat through a PC. It will be running through probably a 386/25. I'd prefer something that is internal, and either DOS or Windoze is adequate as the OS. The system will need to be able to coordinate at least 20 voice-mail-boxes using a touch-tone phone and a single phone number. Security is of course a concern, but not necessarily the most major of them. Price is the biggest factor, as well as the ability to expand to more mail-boxes. Could someone direct me to sources for such items, a FAQ, or the equivalent. All, and any, help is appreciated. Thanks, jjr@wixer.bga.com ------------------------------ From: dannyb@panix.com (danny burstein) Subject: Trans-Oceanic Cable Costs (was About New Zealand) Date: 15 Aug 1993 18:37:14 -0400 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC Lots of earlier discussion about the economics of trans-oceanic cable laying costs, financing, etc., deleted. but then tarl@persion.sw.stratus.com (Tarl Neustaedter) said: > That figure has got to be WAAAAYY off. > For $0.40/channel/day, your cable-laying costs have to be on the order > of $170/km per fully-subscribed T3 link. If you can lay a lot of T3 > links in the same cable (and find buyers for the bandwidth), you can > let that cost balloon -- for example, at 20 T3 links in the cable, you > can spend about $3400/km. But selling more than 10,000 NZ-Hawaii > channels (continuous use, to make the $0.40/day) could be hard -- I'd > be VERY surprised if that much long distance traffic existed on that > line. 10,000 international calls/day, I can believe. But not 240,000 > call-hours/day. We all tend to forget that there is a LOT of additional traffic carried over these links which is not part of the general public trraffic. For example, in this case, let's keep in mind that there are various (US) governmental agencies located in Australia and New Zealand which do all sorts of things they don't discuss, but which require HUGE amounts of data traffic back to the US. Most of this stuff requires full time transmission channels. Based on a few public mentions of these folk (which, of course, may or may not be true), and some back of envelope stuff, I would guess that this traffic alone would take up 20% of the cable capacity. And, for good measure, keep in mind that they might be sending the same info (or spoofed material) over multiple links, including, for example, using the NZ -> Australia ->Europe ->US cables, not to mention quite a few others, and you rapdly find that LOTS of capacity gets grabbed for national security type considerations. And then, of course, there are the other countries that do similar things. (I'm shocked to hear that there's spying going on in this monitoring station!! ...) dannyb@panix.com ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 16:48:06 -0400 From: ANDREW BENSON From: drew@mtu.edu (Andrew Benson) Subject: Online FCC Regulations? Organization: Michigan Technological University Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 20:47:54 GMT Does anyone know if there's an online source for all FCC guidelines? Thanks, Andrew Benson (drew@mtu.edu) ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 15 Aug 93 16:54:47 EDT From: Carl Moore Subject: Attleboro or South Attleboro There was a message in the Digest stating that 508-761 Attleboro is local to some Rhode Island points. 761 and 399 (in area 508) are South Attleboro, not Attleboro, which is served by 222 and 226 in area 508. ------------------------------ From: pushp@nic.cerf.net (Pushpendra Mohta) Subject: Re: Dial N'CERF Date: 15 Aug 1993 15:30:55 GMT Organization: CERFnet In article uttsbbs!gary.edwards@ PacBell.COM (Gary Edwards) writes: > A friend living in Sacramento mentioned he was interested in Dial > N'CERF. Does anyone have any information regarding this that they can > share? Supposedly, my friend believes this Dial N'CERF to be "THE HOT > SETUP!" Give that man a cigar! :-) Well, DIAL N' CERF is a dialup IP service provided by CERFnet. This allows individuals and organizations to gain dialup access to the Internet mail, news, slip, ppp etc ). For more information and prices send a blank message to infoserv@cerf.net. Many organizations provide this service. For a list of such providers send a message to info@internic.net, requesting information on how to connect. Regards, Pushpendra Mohta pushp@cerf.net +1 619 455 3908 Director of Engineering pushp@sdsc.bitnet +1 800 876 2373 CERFNet ------------------------------ From: gavron@spades.aces.com (Ehud Gavron) Subject: Re: Radar and Acronyms Date: 15 Aug 1993 10:46 MST Organization: ACES Research Inc. Reply-To: gavron@ACES.COM In article , padgett@tccslr.dnet.mmc.com (A. Padgett Peterson) writes: > otto@vaxb.acs.unt.edu wrote: >>> FUBAR >> Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition. > Actually this is a "dual use" acronym probably invented by the > military containing a local meaning (among equals) and an "official"... But then ACRONYMS were invented by the military. All Complete Rules Or Names You Must Shorten. Ehud Gavron gavron@aces.com ------------------------------ From: puma@netcom.com (Gary Breuckman) Subject: Re: Cellular Conversation Results in Arrest Organization: organized?? me? Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 20:55:45 GMT In article LESREEVES@delphi.com writes: > Two teenagers have been arrested and charged with the murder of > Michael Jordan's father. The news reports say that the content of > conversations made from Mr. Jordan's cellular phone led to the arrest. > Have similar cases not been thrown out when it was revealed that > cellular phones were monitored? I haven't seen the report, or any detailed information, but the monitoring could have been done under court order, since they knew the phone was missing, or perhaps the arrest was simply based on call detail information. Knowing who was called can help the investigation, this technique being used with normal wired phone lines also. puma@netcom.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 00:21:15 GMT From: taliesin@netcom.com (Glenn R. Stone) Subject: Re: CPSR and the NII In Telecom 13.570.10, Brad Hicks writes: > Internet access already costs a fraction of what it did ten years ago. > Leave it alone for ten more years, and it =will= be affordable to > everyone. If you screw with it, you'll break it. Hey, Brad, leave it alone for even less than that ... it's already affordable to those of us in certain metro areas. I can sink $100 into a cheap terminal, $50 into a cheap 2400 baud modem, $20/month into a commercial account provider, and hey, presto! I'm on the net. Unlimited connect time and the whole nine yards. Granted, it's not universal, yet ... but I think yet is the operative word. And, my provider is not the only provider of this sort of service. Note that this costing is quite comparable to having a phone line installed paid for month-to-month. I have to second Brad's opinion that easy, cheap access to Internet machines is only a short time away ... I'm just shortening his time estimate by a good bit. It's already here in a LOT of areas (most of California, Dallas, Cleveland, New York, DC, and Seattle; Atlanta and Boston RSN), and is spreading like wildfire. Herr Clinton, leave it alone, it'll fix itself. Telecom readers: Tell your politicians about it. Oh, and if you want info on my Internet provider, send me email. Glenn R. Stone (taliesin@netcom.com) Just a satisfied customer of netcom ------------------------------ From: goldstein@carafe.tay2.dec.com (Fred R. Goldstein) Subject: Re: What is Category 5 (re: ISDN) Organization: Digital Equipment Corp., Littleton MA USA Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 01:31:07 GMT In article varney@ihlpe.att.com writes: > In article goldstein@carafe.tay2. > wrote: >> ... While ISDN lines are not supposed to have bridge taps (little >> stubs off the middle), the reality is that bridge taps happen. And a >> little bit of bridge tap creates whopping echo somewhere, which the >> chip tries to cancel. We actually verified (unwanted!) bridge taps on >> lines which were still sort of working, but not working well enough to >> be useful. [...] > Hmmm! Assuming your idea of an ISDN "line" is the same as mine > (2B1Q U interface outside customer prem.), then howcome there's > something like 16 test configurations that a "U" interface has to > handle, and most have multiple bridge taps and multiple cable > guages??? One has, if I recall correctly, a bridge tap off of a > bridge tap. Are you saying ISDN wasn't reliable over a 2B1Q two-wire > interface with a bridge tap? Or were you talking about the S/T > interface (four-wire)? Even the pre-ANSI AT&T U interface would > handle 12000 ft. with a bridge tap or two. Yes, our idea of an outside line is whatever was on the pole ahead of time, at the "U" interface. What we found out, all unofficially of course because the actual trial details are not subject to being publicized, lest the guilty be named :-), was that you can stretch a line just so far. The worst case of bridge-tap-itis occurred on an AMI line, using the non-standard (but still more common here) AT&T 5E4 line card. It is rated for 12.5kf (given the loop in question) but actually worked fine at 12.8, but NOT with a bridge tap! But we also had a 2B1Q line or two :-( fail with bridge taps on them. All were beyond 12kf long. The phone company folks say that ISDN is supposed to be installed on unloaded lines without bridge taps, and the chip folks say that ISDN is supposed to work over some degree of bridge taps, but a clumsy technician working without line records can do amazing damage. Remember these guys have no mobile radios or cellular with them; when they want to talk to the office, they just climb a pole and tap in to any old dial tone. And if there's no dial tone on the buttinski, the pair is free. And ISDN doesn't put dial tone on a buttinski. (Your average lineman doesn't carry an ISDN buttinski and wouldn't know what to do with one.) Fred R. Goldstein goldstein@carafe.tay2.dec.com Opinions are mine alone; sharing requires permission. ------------------------------ From: TELECOM Moderator Subject: FNB, The Post Office and Me Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 20:30:00 CDT I've written up an article on the experience I had with First National Bank of Chicago and the Small Claims case. But it turned out to be longer than what I want to devote space to here, so I am asking for the people who want a copy to write for it. Please write only to 'telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu' so your mail does not clutter up the incoming file of articles or possibly get set aside. I will it out to whatever email address you give me, to do with as you wish. Patrick Townson ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #578 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa01506; 16 Aug 93 18:37 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA03961 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Mon, 16 Aug 1993 15:50:16 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA03019 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Mon, 16 Aug 1993 15:49:36 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 15:49:36 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308162049.AA03019@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #579 TELECOM Digest Mon, 16 Aug 93 15:49:30 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 579 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson IEEE Editor Responds to J. Adams; Call For Papers (Nancy Griffeth) Re: Are We Being Ripped Off in New Zealand? (Paul Houle) Re: Central Office Tours? (Jody Kravitz) Re: Central Office Tours? (Harold Hallikainen) Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal (Curtis Bohl) Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal (Joel Upchurch) Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal (Paul Houle) Re: Emergency TDD to Use 311 (Kai Schlichting) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: nancyg@banshee.bellcore.com (Nancy Griffeth) Organization: Morristown Research and Engineering Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 18:51:51 GMT Subject: IEEE Editor Responds to J. Adams; Call For Papers In article , jadams@athens.cc.bellcore. com (adams ,john) writes: > Yesterday's snail mail brought (unshredded for a change) concurrent > issues from the IEEE highlighting research into a growing topic of > concern within the industry, Feature Interaction within the public > network. Appropriately, the IEEE Computer Magazine's cover chose a > "house of cards" illustration to bring attention to the seriousness of > the potential problem. > Having read the guest editor's introductions and the two tutorial > articles, I'm inclined to believe that there isn't much practical > information beyond these. It's a shame that the editor's couldn't > have included some of the practical initiatives underway within the > industry. The Internetwork Interoperability Test Program (IITP) is > making very strong contributions to insuring the integrity of the > underlying SS7 network in the US. As one of the co-editors of this issue, I agree that it's a shame that we couldn't have included more work on initiatives that are underway. We did send out an open call for papers, using all the usual avenues and some unusual ones -- internal mail at a number of telecommunica- tions companies, postings to a variety of netnews groups, including this one, snail-mail, and printed advertisements. We were quite disappointed at the small response from Bellcore. But I'm glad you found the introductions and the tutorials useful, and sorry you didn't find the excellent articles in Computer by Fekete (on specifications) and Velthuijsen (on the application of distributed artificial intelligence to telecommunications) more useful. These areas will be increasingly important to solving the problem in the future, when there may be many providers of services and no single organization can expect to handle resolution of all interactions. You may have been unhappy because of the speculative nature of these articles, but for immediate application, you certainly shouldn't ignore the work of Wakahara et. al. from KDD and Kuisch et. al. from PTT Research on determining the information required to resolve interactions. These papers appear in Communications. This is important work, based on practical experience, on a part of the problem that has been given far too little attention. I should mention that the motivation of the two issues was more to interest people in the problem than to present the solutions. In an open telecommunications network, feature interactions will be far more likely and also more dangerous than they are at present. We doubt that the efforts of any single organization will suffice to solve the problem, and since it's quite an interesting and important one, so we are hoping to attract attention from outside the industry and even from computer scientists who have no previous background in telecommunications. The papers that were published in Communications were originally presented at the First Workshop on Feature Interactions. Please consider submitting a paper on the Internetwork Interoperability Test Program (IITP) to the second Workshop on Feature Interactions, to be held in Amsterdam next May (or to the third, to be held in Australia in May, 1995). Speaking as one of the organizers of the first workshop, we were disappointed that there were only two presentations on testing, one by Roshan Chaddha of Bellcore as part of a panel and the other based on some work done at the University of Wisconsin by Reps and Horwitz. I'm sure that a discussion of your work on testing would be most welcome. You should also be aware of a mailing list that has been set up for the use of people interested in the feature interaction problem. You can subscribe to it by sending mail to fits-mgr@csi.uottawa.ca; postings go to fits-list@csi.uottawa.ca. I'm including a (repeat) announcement of the workshop for your information and that of other interested readers. Nancy Griffeth nancyg@bellcore.com CALL FOR PARTICIPATION Second International Workshop on Feature Interactions in Telecommunications Software Systems Amsterdam, The Netherlands May 9-10, 1994 DESCRIPTION This workshop is the second in a series, whose mission is to encourage researchers from a variety of computer science specialties (software engineering, protocol engineering, distributed artificial intel- ligence, formal techniques, software testing, and distributed systems, among others) to apply their techniques to the feature interaction problem that arises in building telecommunications software systems (see the back page for a description of the problem). We welcome papers on avoiding, detecting, and/or resolving feature interactions using either analytical or structural approaches. Submissions are encouraged in (but are not limited to) the following topic areas: - Classification of feature interactions. - Modeling, reasoning, and testing techniques for detecting feature interactions. - Software platforms and architecture designs to aid in avoiding, detecting, and resolving feature interactions. - Tools and methodologies for promoting software compatibility and extensibility. - Mechanisms for managing feature interactions throughout the service life-cyle. - Management of feature interactions in PCS, ISDN, and Broadband services, as well as IN services. - Management of feature interactions in various of the operations support functions such as Service Negotiation, Service Management, and Service Assurance. - Feature Interactions and their potential impact on system Security and Safety. - Environments and automated tools for related problems in other software systems. - Management of Feature Interactions in various proposed architectures such as TMN, INA, ROSA, CASSIOPEIA, SERENITE, or PLATINA. FORMAT We hope to promote a dialogue among researchers in various related areas, as well as the designers and builders of telecommunications software. To this end, the workshop will have sessions for paper presentations, including relatively long discussion periods. Panel discussions and tool demonstrations are also planned. ATTENDANCE Workshop attendance will be limited to 90 people. Attendance will be by invitation only. Prospective attendees are asked to submit either a paper (maximum 5000 words) or a single page description of their interests and how they relate to the workshop. About 16-20 of the attendees will be asked to present talks. We will strive for an equal mix of theoretical results and practical experiences. Papers will be published in a conference proceedings. SUBMISSIONS Please send five copies of your full original paper or interest description to: Wiet Bouma PTT Research, Dr. Neher Laboratories PO Box 421 or St. Paulusstraat 4 2260 AK Leidschendam 2264 XZ Leidschendam The Netherlands The Netherlands E-mail: L.G.Bouma@research.ptt.nl Tel: +31 70 332 5457 FAX: +31 70 332 6477 IMPORTANT DATES: November 15, 1993: Submission of contributions. January 15, 1993 : Notification of acceptance. February 15, 1993: Submission of camera-ready versions. WORKSHOP CO-CHAIRPERSONS Wiet Bouma & Hugo Velthuijsen (PTT, The Netherlands) PROGRAM COMMITTEE Chair: E. Jane Cameron (Bellcore, USA) Jan Bergstra (CWI and University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Ralph Blumenthal (Bellcore, USA) Kong Eng Cheng (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Australia) Bernie Cohen (City University of London, UK) Fulvio Faraci (CSELT, Italy) Robert France (Florida Atlantic University, USA) Steve German (GTE, USA) David Gill (MITRE, USA) Richard Kemmerer (UCSB, USA) Eric Kuisch (PTT Research, The Netherlands) Victor Lesser (University of Massachusetts, USA) Yow-Jian Lin (Bellcore, USA) Luigi Logrippo (University of Ottawa, Canada) Robert Milner (BNR, UK) Leo Motus (Tallinn Technical University, Estonia) Jacques Muller (CNET, France) Jan-Olof Nordenstam (ELLEMTEL, Sweden) Stott Parker (UCLA, USA) Ben Potter (BNR, UK) Henrikas Pranevitchius (Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania) Lynne Presley (Bellcore, USA) Jean-Bernard Stefani (CNET, France) Greg Utas (BNR, Canada) Juri Vain (Institute of Cybernetics, Estonia) Yasushi Wakahara (KDD R&D Laboratories, Japan) Ron Wojcik (BellSouth, USA) Pamela Zave (AT&T Bell Laboratories, USA) WORKSHOP STATEMENT The feature interaction problem has been a major obstacle to the rapid deployment of new telephone services. Telecommunications software is huge, real-time, and distributed; adding new features to a tele- communication system, like adding new functionalities to any large software system, can be very difficult. Each new feature may interact with many existing features, causing customer annoyance or total system breakdown. Traditionally, interactions were detected and re- solved on a feature by feature basis by experts who are knowledgeable on all existing features. As the number of features grows to satisfy diverse needs of customers, managing feature interactions in a single administrative domain is approaching incomprehensible complexity. In a future marketplace where features deployed in the network may be developed by different operating companies and their associated ven- dors, the traditional approach is no longer feasible. How to detect, resolve, or even prevent the occurrence of feature interactions in an open network becomes an important research issue. The feature interaction problem is not unique to telecommunications software; similar problems are encountered in any long-lived software system that requires frequent changes and additions to its func- tionality. Techniques in many related areas appear to be applicable to the management of feature interactions. Software methodologies for extensibility and compatibility, for example, could be useful for providing a structured design that can prevent many feature inter- actions from occurring. Formal specification, verification, and tes- ting techniques, being widely used in protocol engineering and software engineering, contribute a lot to the detection of inter- actions. Several causes of the problem, such as aliasing, timing, and the distribution of software components, are similar to issues in distributed systems. Cooperative problem solving, a promising approach for resolving interactions at run time, resembles distributed planning and resolution of conflicting subgoals among multiple agents in the area of distributed artificial intelligence. This workshop aims to provide an opportunity for participants to share ideas and experiences in their respective fields, and to apply their expertise to the feature interaction problem. ------------------------------ From: Paul.Houle@leotech.MV.COM (Paul Houle) Reply-To: houle@leotech.MV.COM Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 11:55:00 Subject: Re: Are we Being Ripped Off in New Zealand Sometimes it seems to me that the telephone companies think that the "information superhighway" is going to be a big gold rush for them. The impression that I get is that they seem to think that they are going to be able to charge rates that are proportional to bandwidth, starting with the rate of voice telephone service. So, if you get T1 bandwidth into your house, they'll be making 24 times as much money. This is the gloating behind the "YOU WILL" ads. They think that YOU WILL pay through the nose; I mean, let's face it, almost every commercial digital data service from switched 56 to X.25 to digital cellular is priced out of the market. And then the phone companies wonder why we're using modems on ordinary phone lines that are not "conditioned for data transmission". The fact is with state-of-the-art technology, the cost of putting video-grade bandwidth into a home and transmitting it cross country shouldn't be much more expensive in the long run [the ~big~ cost is the fiber local loops which will probably be used for at least 100 years] than voice grade service costs today. If the superhighway becomes reality, the phone company will have to reduce the price of voice-grade communications to almost nothing. And if the phone company doesn't do it, people will be able to set up very simple aggregation systems which ~do~ do it. YOU WILL. Origin: NETIS (603)432-2517/432-0922 (HST/V32) (1:132/189) ------------------------------ From: kravitz@foxtail.com (Jody Kravitz) Subject: Re: Central Office Tours? Organization: The Foxtail Group Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 05:51:25 GMT Jim.Rees@umich.edu writes: > In article , co057@cleveland.Freenet. > Edu (Steven H. Lichter) writes: >> Yes the step equipment was a lot more interesting. We had mockups of >> switch trains that would let the tours see how the calls went through, > There is still a working step-by-step demo switch train in the telephone > museum in Atlanta, Georgia. There is a telecom museum in the "oldtown" part of Edmonton, Alberta, which I visited this summer. They have a cordboard with about 10 phones which the kids are invited to try out. For the adults there are DMS, Crossbar, and Step PBXs, in operating condition to try out. There are a lot of very old things on display as well, such as phones with 11 hole dials. ------------------------------ From: hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) Subject: Re: Central Office Tours? Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 06:09:24 GMT In article co057@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steven H. Lichter) writes: > Yes the step equipment was a lot more interesting. We had mockups of > switch trains that would let the tours see how the calls went through, > and there were also contests for free long distance calls. I know it > was fun to work those tours. We got paid for it and had a lot of fun. > But then in those days the job was fun; today all I can think of many > days it getting out of there or vacation. Had I been offered a package > I'm sure I would have taken it. I do my job the way I was trained, but > the stress level at times is really something. I got tours of step offices in the SF east bay (Moraga is one I recall) when I was in high school. Also, in London (England) in 1986, I visited a museum of science and technology. They had some step equipment on display. Any museums like that around the US? Also in high school I recall going to a museum somewhere around San Jose, CA that had a bunch of old electronics, a lot of Edison's stuff. They also seemed to have a lot of German music boxes that used disks with punched holes. So, who's keeping the history for us? Harold Hallikainen ap621@Cleveland.Freenet.edu Hallikainen & Friends, Inc. hhallika@oboe.calpoly.edu 141 Suburban Road, Bldg E4 phone 805 541 0200 fax 544 6715 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-7590 telex 4932775 HFI UI ------------------------------ From: EXTMO4H@mizzou1.missouri.edu (Missouri 4-H Youth Development Programs) Subject: Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal Organization: University of Missouri Date: Sun, 15 Aug 93 20:55:26 CDT In article : > [Moderator's Note: Well, you know the only reason we hear a ringing > signal from the other end is so that people will be assured their call > is being processed rather than ignored. The ring we hear in our ear > has nothing to do with the ring being given on the other end via the > phone bell; but if telco did not provide a ringing signal back to the > caller, many people would think that the phone was out of order. That > is the truth, seriously. No reason at all to provide a 'ringing sig- > nal to the caller which has no relationship to the signal given the > called party other than to placate or humor the caller. PAT] I always assumed in the old electro-mechanical CO, I found that the ringing signal followed the ringing current transmission to the called telephone. In the Stromberg-Carlson exchange I toured years ago, there was a gear motor driving a row of cams that switched the various signals, including busy, ringing signal, and ringing current for the entire exchange. Can anyone confirm that in some of the old CO, the ringing signal was actually the 20 Hz ringing current? I was always interested in the different ringing signal sounds that have been used in different COs. On a related note, I remember when the whole exchange lost dial tone one afternoon when the dial tone tube burnt out (this occured in the early '80s). Now, all we have to worry about is cable washouts from the flood, etc. Some people at home haven't had phone service for a month due to the Missouri River flooding. Curtis Bohl Computer Programmer/Analyst extmo4h@mizzou1.missouri.edu 4-H Youth Development Alternate: bohlc@ext.missouri.edu Programs ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal From: upchrch!joel@peora.sdc.ccur.com (Joel Upchurch) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 03:41:35 EDT Organization: Upchurch Computer Consulting, Orlando FL > [Moderator's Note: Well, you know the only reason we hear a ringing > signal from the other end is so that people will be assured their call > is being processed rather than ignored. The ring we hear in our ear > has nothing to do with the ring being given on the other end via the > phone bell; That does tend to explain people who call and claim that I answered before the phone rang. And why my answering machine sometimes picks up on the third or fifth ring when I call home, when it is supposed to answer on the fourth. (If your mail bounces use the address below.) Joel Upchurch/Upchurch Computer Consulting/718 Galsworthy/Orlando, FL 32809 joel@peora.ccur.com {uiucuxc,hoptoad,petsd,ucf-cs}!peora!joel (407) 859-0982 [Moderator's Note: Sure, because you get a ring, then they get a ring in their ear. You grab the phone on the first ring or first half-ring and the caller may not hear anything at all except your answer. PAT] ------------------------------ From: Paul.Houle@leotech.MV.COM (Paul Houle) Reply-To: houle@leotech.MV.COM Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 11:13:00 Subject: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal > Where can one get ahold of the 'thought and research' that went > into some of the characteristics of the POTS service? I would be > interested in hearing the tradeoffs made as decisions were cast > on the user interface to the switched network. A good college library should have a set of back issues of the "Bell System Technical Journal". A victim of divestiture, it doesn't exist anymore. There still is some kind of "AT&T technical journal", but it's not the same. Anyway, anyone who is into technical things, and not just telecommunications, can spend hundreds of hours paging through back issues. For starters, there is Shannon's famous 1948 paper that created the field of information theory. [And, like most great papers, it's still a better introduction to the field than any textbook] There are articles discussing human factors research on everything from the shape of touch tone pads to TSPS positions to the abbreviation of commands in UNIX. Don't forget the detailed descriptions of every major and minor switching system that the Bell System ever used. And the articles about how they repaired the damage that the STARFISH nuclear test did to the Telstar satellite. It even has good articles for people with criminal minds; one article in the early 1960s gave phreaks the inspiration to build themselves little blue boxes. I also remember seeing one on "designing compatabile currency" for coin phones that listed the moments of inertia, magnetic properties and everything about US coinage, and gave formulas for designing compatible "coins" out of nearly arbitrary metals. In all, anything you want to know about the pre-divestiture phone system is in BSTJ, as well enough wonderful technical articles to keep your head spinning for days. Origin: NETIS (603)432-2517/432-0922 (HST/V32) (1:132/189) ------------------------------ From: acorn@info2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (Kai Schlichting) Subject: Re: Emergency TDD to Use 311 Date: 16 Aug 1993 06:01:42 GMT Organization: Newsserver, Comp.Center (RUS), U of Stuttgart, FRG Dave Niebuhr (dwn@dwn.ccd.bnl.gov) wrote: > I left the .sig in for a purpose. TDD for the deaf to use in > emergencies is an *excellent* idea. Now that the deaf are mainstreaming > into the hearing community in expanding numbers, some method must be Now this is news to me! In the early 80's there was a mainstreaming movement amoung the deaf, mainly because parents were fed up with bad quality of education in deaf institutions, and sent their deaf kids to normal schools. This has been changing a lot during the late 80's, and by now, I'd say, there are more deaf people in deaf schools than ever before. If you mean, however, 'mainstreaming' in the sense of 'integrating into the normal workplace', then you are right. To have at least one sentence of rebuttal to what other posters said in the thread about Alex Bell: building a deaf community and refusal to learn lipreading/oral speech doesn't separate deaf people from the real world, and I mean deaf, not hard-of-hearing. Even ten years of learning lipreading enables them to read 25% of what has been said, at most, all other is guess-work. There are countless stories of horror about 'oral school' amoung todays' deaf, and no, immigrants coming into the country who refuse to learn English cannot be compared with them. One group _cannot_ learn oral English, while the other _refuses_ to do so. A helluva difference. > done to insure that the deaf can reach the emergency services if they > are required. > The recent discussions about Alexander Graham Bell and his wife and > now the referenced post will hopefully enlighten some to take > advantage of the work that the deaf can do, if just given half of a > chance. > Since 1978, I have worked with at least four graduates of the NTID on > a full-time basis and I don't remember how many summer students, and > it has been a rewarding experience and one that I'm proud to have. That the best students don't always get the best jobs was sadly confirmed this summer for my wife: the hearing institute in Kresge/MI could not give her an intership (as the student who made the best impression in interviews,grades,interest) because she is a Canadian citizen, and a big part to fund the interships came from a US government agency, which ruled that no foreigners should be accepted, albeit she attends school here in the US and pays foreign-student tuitions (which now increase to insane levels, thanks to the checkbouncers from the hill, four miles apart). It ended with no internship at all,at a GPA of 3.9 in three years straight. America first? Quality is 30-day money-back-guaranty? We never felt so pissed and frustrated in a long time. Bye, Kai ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #579 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa24570; 17 Aug 93 12:51 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA13454 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 02:40:39 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA22956 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 02:40:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 02:40:01 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308170740.AA22956@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #582 TELECOM Digest Tue, 17 Aug 93 02:40:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 582 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Are We Being Ripped Off in New Zealand? (Laurence Chiu) Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal (Macy Hallock) TrueVoice (tm) - The True Story (Dave Grabowski) Re: AT&T Language Line Choices (Will Martin) Re: Radar and Acronyms (Radio Stations) (Ron Bean) Re: Last Laugh! Why Light a Candle; Curse the Darkness (M. Terribile) Re: Administrivia: Need Issues 36-37 (TELECOM Moderator) ---------------------- TELECOM Digest is an e-journal devoted mostly -- but not exclusively -- to discussions on voice telephony. The Digest is a not-for-profit public service published frequently by Patrick Townson Associates. PTA markets a no-surcharge telephone calling card and a no monthly fee 800 service. In addition, we are resellers of AT&T's Software Defined Network. For a detailed discussion of our services, write and ask for the file 'products'. The Digest is delivered at no charge by email to qualified subscribers on any electronic mail service connected to the Internet. To join the mail- ing list, write and tell us how you qualify: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu. All article submissions MUST be sent to our email address: telecom@eecs. nwu.edu -- NOT as replies to comp.dcom.telecom. Back issues and numerous other telephone-related files of interest are available from the Telecom Archives, using anonymous ftp lcs.mit.edu. Login anonymous, then 'cd telecom-archives'. At the present time, the Digest is also ported to Usenet at the request of many readers there, where it is known as 'comp.dcom.telecom'. Use of the Digest does not require the use of our products and services. The two are separate. All articles are the responsibility of the individual authors. Organi- zations listed, if any, are for identification purposes only. The Digest is compilation-copyrighted, 1993. **DO NOT** cross-post articles between the Digest and other Usenet or alt newsgroups. Do not compile mailing lists from the net-addresses appearing herein. Send tithes and love offerings to PO Box 1570, Chicago, IL 60690. :) Phone: 312-465-2700. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Are We Being Ripped Off in New Zealand? From: uttsbbs!laurence.chiu@PacBell.COM (Laurence Chiu) Date: 16 Aug 93 20:44:00 GMT Organization: The Transfer Station BBS, Danville, CA - 510-837-4610/837-5591 Reply-To: uttsbbs!laurence.chiu@PacBell.COM (Laurence Chiu) In a article, Jonathan Mosen said: > Here in New Zealand, we've recently hosted a telecommunications show. > Many of the world's major individual and corporate movers and shakers > were present. The limelight was stolen by an Australian telecommun- > ications "expert", who was doing the talk show circuit claiming that > the world's telecommunications companies were involved in a massive > cartel designed to extort huge sums of money from the unsuspecting > consumer. He claimed that it would be possible for a call to be made > from New Zealand to Hawaii for 25 cents a day. That's about 40 US > cents. > The reply from a representative of Telecom here in New Zealand > basically amounted to "but long distance calls are heavily subsidizing > other areas such as line rental". > [Moderatator's Note: As international calling services such as Tele- > passport have gotten underway, a number of folks have begun noticing > how much less international calls *could* cost, with the proprietors > still making a profit. The TP rates are typically 40-50 percent less > than 'the cartel' charges. I don't know if I agree with his exact > figures or not, but even considering cross-subsidies where they still > occur, long distance in general costs too much. PAT] As a NZ'er living currently domiciled in the US I have some sympathy with this poster. There might be some validity to the claim that you can call for cheaper since: 1. Clear (2nd LD company in NZ) offers lower rates than Telecom; 2. AT&T has a summer sale on at present where you can call NZ from the US for US$0.45 and I am sure they are making money on it; 3. MCI always has lower rates if you use their F&F scheme. Has anyone seen a situation where a phone company made a financial loss in a year? BTW Pat's Telepassport's scheme looks interesting. Having a flat rate (no higher first minute charge and time of day independent) is very attractive since many international LD calls are faxes which take 60 seconds usually for one page. Laurence Chiu The Transfer Station BBS (510) 837-4610 & 837-5591 (V.32bis both lines) Danville, California, USA. 1.5 GIG Files & FREE public Internet Access [Moderator's Note: Between the US and quite a few countries, Telepassport operates at a flat rate per minute *calling to the USA* but with a higher first minute on calls outbound from here. Other times not. I think it depends on the deal they had to cut with the telecom adminis- trations in exchange for allowing signalling. There are also a few places where Telepassport has to take on an 'access fee' merely to call their switch; typically 20-30 cents for the whole session regardless of how many calls are made in the session or how long they last. This is more money the PTTs extract for letting TP operate. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 23:33 EDT From: macy@fmsys.fmsystm.ncoast.org (Macy Hallock) Subject: Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal Reply-To: macy@telemax.com Organization: F M Systems/Telemax Medina, Ohio USA In article is written: > Can anyone confirm that in some of the old CO, the ringing signal was > actually the 20 Hz ringing current? I was always interested in the > different ringing signal sounds that have been used in different COs. Ringing, dial tone and other progress tones were derived in several way in SxS and Xbar CO's. Before solid state, transistorized tone generator became common, most SxS CO's had rotary, belt driven tone (and ringing) generators. These were driven by DC motors off the 48V plant. In smaller CO's a generator start lead was carried off the many bays of equipment to allow the units to shut down at low use periods (midnite to 6AM) These were three or four generator units, that looked somewhat like older auto generators or electric motors, with belts and pulleys, mounted on a free standing frame that looked a little like a gray steel frame end table. There would be two complete units, to allow for failures and maintance, located in the power room. Depending on the age and design of the CO, the interrupter camshaft might also be part of this assembly. In the AE CO's I worked in, the generators were more complex because five frequencies of harmonic ring generator were required for party line ringing. Later, the early solid state units from Lorain and others came along and began to replace these mechanical units. Although well designed for the application, the maintenance needs of the older rotary units made transistorized units economical. The early units only were used for audible tones (dial, busy, reorder and ringback), and incorporated solid state interrupters to eliminate camshafts. Later, ringing generator was added. There were tube based tone generation systems, but they seemed to be used less often than mechanical rotary or transistorized systems. On a few small CO's, and some PBX's ringback tone was actually "leaked" generator voltage. Leich PBX's come to mind (Ugh!). This made for a "low pitched, fluttery sound" on 20hz ringing systems, and sounded a little bit better with the cheaper 30hz power supplies. Also, the tones were not standardized like today, and different CO's would have different sounding dial tone and busy tone. The one thing that was standardized was the speed of the interruptions for busy (60 IPM) and reorder (120 IPM) tones. Ringing was supposed to be 1 sec on and 4 seconds off, but I saw other speeds. Depending on the type of CO, ringback might or might not coinside with the actual ring sent out on the line. Crossbar systems used both kinds of plants, but usually used relay chains for interruption instead of camshafts. Since crossbar came later than SxS in the US, transistorized tone genertors were more common. The all relay central offices made by North Electric and others tended to use relay based interruptors and rotary generators until the Lorain Sub-Cycle transistorized units caught in the early 60's. I saw one all relay small CO with a relay and tube based generator system that was truly odd when I first started in telephone in 1968. It was replaced with a Sub-Cycle shortly thereafter, due to reliability problems with the old unit. The last fully mechanical rotary tone/generator plant I saw in service was in a Northern Ohio Telephone Co CO in 1967. (NOTC was purchased by General Telephone in 1968). It was in an AE SxS CO. Rotary ring generators worked fine, but the rotary tone generators could not make precise dial tone, so many CO's had their tone plant updated when the telco offered touch-tone to rotary convertors. Directorized SxS CO's and tone-equipped crossbar CO's were also converted. Early touch=tone receivers had absolutely no tolerance for non-precise dial tone. (Lots of people didn't like the "new" dial tone and called repair to complain, too) Now, aren't you sorry you asked? [grin] Macy Hallock N8OBG Voice= +1.216.723.3030 Fax= +1.216.723.3223 macy@telemax.com Telemax Inc. and F M Systems Inc. 152 Highland Drive Medina, Ohio 44256 USA ------------------------------ From: dcg5662@hertz.njit.edu (Dave Grabowski) Subject: TrueVoice (tm) - The True Story Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 02:43:53 GMT After the hundreds of messages here (which cost the net hundreds, if not thousands of dollars, each) about the "TrueVoice Demo" number, I felt it appropriate to really find out what the heck this thing is. Someone (I forget who you are, but thanks!) E-Mailed me the patent number, and voila! TrueVoice revealed. [I'm not putting the whole thing here, because it's rather long and I don't wanna type that much. Include are some highlights. All typos are myne :) ] [Note: This patent is registered in nine countries. My source didn't have the US version available, but was able to obtain the European version. It is assumed that they are identical.] Patent Number: EP-48953-A2 [US-5195132-A] "The invention relates to a method of processing speech signals transmited by a telephgone station set, and more particularly relates to a method of enhancing the quality of such signals before they are supplied to the receiving telephone set." It is first noted that "telephone station sets" (i.e., your phone) are "designed so that [they] noticeably attenuate signals below 300Hz. In fact, the EIA standart (sic) RS-470 relating to the design of telephone instruments recommends such attenuation below 300Hz. What this means is that the quality of voice signals that are received at a telephone station set is noticeable dimished as a result of severely attenuating the level of such signals below 300Hz at the transmitting station set." "... as a result of the aforementioned signals attenuation that is introduced by a telephone station set, the quality of the voice signals that the station transmits will be greatly diminished and, therefore, will not represent the speaker's true voice signals." ^^^^^^^^^^ Cute, eh? ------------- Apparently, signals below 300Hz roll off sharply, at approximately 12dB per octave. We are shown a new frequency response curve, which raises signals from 100-300Hz by 10-15dB. An "illustrative embodiment of the invention" was put together with a Yamaha DEQ7 digital equalizer. This bass booster (my term, not theirs) is ideally placed in an echo canceller in the LD switch. Specific details of exactly *HOW* they do it aren't given, but we can assume that all they're doing is throwing in little boosters everywhere in their echo cancellors to beef up the 100-300Hz range. That's *IT*. You see these lousy commercials of the bald head with big lit-up ears every day, and this is all that they're doing. HMPF! And it seems that what all us netters THOUGHT that they were doing is *EXACTLY* what was being done. This patent seems so broad that I wonder if the other big two will be able to implement similar setups without infringing on the patent. Technically, it's rather easy to do (although, rather expensive to outfit a world-wide network), so it's not like AT&T has some sort of proprietary design. If there's enough demand, I might be able to get this scanned in and posted for ftp. Dave dcg5662@hertz.njit.edu 70721.2222@compuserve.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 19:47:35 CDT From: Will Martin Subject: AT&T Language Line Choices Heavy sigh ... I guess nobody else is dumb enough to type all this in ... I have before me a leaflet dated 1991 advertising the AT&T Language Line, with a page of tiny print listing all the languages offered at that time. Ever since this was first advertised, I suspected that getting these translators on-line would NOT be as simple and quick as the ads implied, and the recent post about how difficult it was to actually USE the service reinforced my longstanding belief. So I would really like AT&T to PROVE that they can provide access to *any* of their advertised listed languages in a short timeframe, suitable for emergency use. I'd especially like to see them show a "language identification" procedure so that someone getting a call from a panicked person speaking some totally-unrecognizable tongue could patch in a Language Line server and have the language identified and a suitable translator on-line before the person calling hangs up in frustration (or is mugged into unconsciousness or burned to death ...). I do not think that is possible; the reported frustration with an in-the-news-recently Eastern European language leads me to believe that rapid recognition and translation of the more obscure third-world languages on the list below is highly unlikely ... Here it is: Adaric Akan Aklanon Albanian Amharic Amoy Anharic/Tigrina Anwheiese Arabic Arixara Armenian Assyrian Azerbajani Bambara Bamileke Bengali Bhopuri Bicol Bikom Bulgarian Burmese Cambodian Cantonese Catalan Cebuano Chaldean Chamorro Chao-Chou Creole Cypriot Czech Dakota Danish Dari Dutch Estonian Fanti Farsi Fijian Finnish French Fukienese Gaddang Georgian German Greek Gujarati Haitian Creole Hakka Hangehouese Harari Haruba Hausa/Yoruba Hawaiian Hebei Hebrew Hindi Hmong Hokkien Hunanese Hungarian Ibanao Ibo Icelandic Ilocano Indones/Malayan Indonesian Italian Jakartanese Japanese Javanese Kankaney Kapampangan Kikuyu Kiowa Korean Kurdish Ladino Lakota Laotian Libyan Lithuanian Luganda Macedonian Magani Maghrebi Maithili Malagaby Malay Malayalam Man/Can Mandarin Mandinka Manxon Mien Min/urd Moroccan Nakota Nanjingnese Neapolitan Ninponese Norwegian Oriya Oromo Palestinian Pangasinan Pao-An Papiamentu Pashto Pidgin English Pidgin-Hawaii Polish Portuguese Pueblo Pular Punjabi Quechua Romanian Russian Samarinio Samoan Sardinian Senegalese Serbocroatian Shanghaiese Shantung Sicilian Sinhalese Sioux Slovak Slovenian Somalian Spanish Suchownese Sundanese Swahili Swedish Szechuan Sagalog Tagalog/Ilocano Taiwanese Tamil Tewa Thai Tigrinya Toishanese Tongan Toucouleur Toyshanese Turkish Turkmen Twi Ukranian Urdu Vietnamese Wolof Wuxinese Yiddish Yoruba ... Hmmmm ... methinks they artificially expand this list by including many dialects or slight variants on the basic, and I bet the same translator(s) handle them all -- note all the national variations of Arabic, for example. I hope you-all appreciate this; my eyes are now killing me ... :-) Trying to read this tiny print and my screen at the same time is next to impossible. I thought "Assyrian" and "Chaldean" were dead languages known only by a few scholars these days -- are there really people living around the Euphrates today speaking the same language that was spoken in Ur? Talk about an oral history ...! :-) Regards, Will ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Radar and Acronyms (Radio Stations) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 19:38:59 CDT From: Ron Bean Eric_N._Florack.cru-mc@xerox.com writes: > In your acronyms, nobody has mentioned that there were several radio > stations that used their callsigns for such. This is kinda fun, so ... WORT = World's Oldest Radio Transmitter This "listener-sponsored" station was started in the mid-70's with very little money (although they've been able to upgrade their equipment and studios since then). I think the original transmitter dated back to the 40's and could not be heard in some parts of the city because the dome of the state Capital building was in the way. At one point they also claimed to have the oldest wire-service printer still in use (sorry, I don't know what model). Our "Mainstream" (state funded) public radio station is WERN, which stands for Wisconsin Educational Radio Network. Their AM station is WHA, which claims to be the "Oldest Station in the Nation" (it was originally an experimental station called 9XM; their claim is disputed by another station out east). Other stations on the state network include: WHAD = WHA--Delafield (near Milwaukee) WHHI = WHA--Highland (southwest Wisconsin) WHLA = WHA--LaCrosse WHRM = WHA--Rib Mountain (near Wausau) WHSA = ? (Brule, near Superior) WHWC = ? (Colfax, near Eau Claire) WLBL = Land of Beautiful Lakes (Auburndale, central Wisconsin) WPNE = North East? (Green Bay) Most of these were originally weather transmitters. They had a "Weather Roundup" every morning at 7:16, when they would go down the list and the engineer on duty at each station would read the weather conditions. They used some kind of in-band signalling, so you'd hear " This is John Doe at WHSA--Brule, the temperature is 68 degrees, visibility 5 miles", or whatever. They stopped doing this sometime in the 70's. Other stations have been added to the network since then; the ones above are the ones I remember hearing each morning. Only WHA and WLBL are still AM, the rest are now FM. BTW, some people claim that Wisconsin and Minnesota have above-average public radio stations because we're close enough to the Canadian border to be able to pick up the CBC, which sets a good example for us. Another I forgot above was WHA = Wisconsin: Heartland of America. zaphod@madnix.UUCP (Ron Bean) uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!madnix!zaphod ------------------------------ From: mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us Subject: Re: Last Laugh! Why Light a Candle if You Can Curse the Darkness? Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 11:54:45 GMT In article , George Gilder <0004091174@ mcimail.com> writes: > [Virtual Moderator responds: This newsgroup gets almost as > hysterical as some of the things I used to read in dear old Malcomb's > magazine before he departed this vail of tears. PAT] Perhaps a virtual dictionary is in order? The phrase is `vale of tears,' as in `mourning and weeping in this valley of tears.' Ol' Capitalist Tool's editors would never have let that one get by! (This man's opinions are his own.) From mole-end Mark Terribile mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us, Somewhere in Matawan, NJ [Moderator's Note: I was just testing to see how many people would catch this error! :) PAT] ------------------------------ From: TELECOM Moderator Subject: Administrivia: Need Issues 36-37 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 02:00:00 A file of back issues from earlier this year in the archives got corrupted somehow. I spent some time reconstructing it, but came up short on two issues I have no other copies of: 36 and 37 from the beginning days of this year in volume 13. I am almost embarassed to ask but does anyone have copies of those two issues so I can put them in the archives? Speaking of the archives, many of you wrote me Monday with your thoughts on the Archives, i.e. CD ROM versus diskettes versus a dial up versus putting them on UUNET's 900 line, etc. I am sifting through it all ... and probably Tuesday evening will run excerpts of the messages you sent me. PAT ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #582 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa24722; 17 Aug 93 12:54 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA19207 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 01:40:18 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA14497 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 01:39:32 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 01:39:32 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308170639.AA14497@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #581 TELECOM Digest Tue, 17 Aug 93 01:39:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 581 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: CPSR and the NII (Alan T. Furman) Re: Looking For PC Voicemail Card (Gary Breuckman) Re: Free French Phone Information From Publiphone (Steven Schwartz) Re: Video Conference Standards (Bruce Taylor) Re: Status of Cellular Data (Jim Rees) Re: MCI PC Connect Plan (Eight Cents/Min Evening/Night/Weekend) (R. Eden) Re: Flooding in the Midwest (Bill Marshall) Re: Local Calls via LD Carrier? (Steve Cogorno) Re: Cellular Conversation Results in Arrest (Jim Rees) Re: IEEE Editor Responds to J. Adams; Call For Papers (Al Varney) Re: FCC Equal Access Order (Mike Ho) Re: ADSI-Protocol (Jack Pines) Last Laugh! Here We Go Again: What Are These? (Warren Victorian) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: atfurman@cup.portal.com Subject: Re: CPSR and the NII Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 03:54:17 PDT Brad Hicks writes: > The 64-kilobit question is this: WHO defines "reasonable cost"? The > provider or the customer? If "all citizens have affordable network > access" then they can't price NII any higher than phone service ... > which means one of two things, (a) running it at a loss (hah), or (b) > holding a gun to my head again and demanding that I fork over yet more > dough. "The whole idea of our government is this: If enough people get together and act in concert, they can take something and not pay for it." P.J. O'Rourke _A Parliament of Whores_ > Sigh. Wasn't it Tom Foley who just the other day said that the > Democrat tax increases send "a clear message" to the American people: > "Stand and deliver"? I would associate it with a somewhat different posture ... > The 30%+ of my gross income that I'm paying in one tax or another > isn't good enough, now you want me to pay more, to subsidize every > po'bucker and Welfare brat's access to the Internet? The newer the technology, the fewer the people who can afford it. This gets the Egalitarians started. (You know who the Egalitarians are -- they're the people who consider it a moral outrage that *nearly half the population makes less than the median wage*!!!) Their solution is to demand subsidies, either monetary or in-kind, using rhetoric full of conveniently vague terms like "having the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes" or "reasonable cost" ... or "social responsibility." Please observe the consequences of this process. The harder engineers and entrepreneurs work to bring out new technologies, the higher their tax rates and regulatory burdens. > You think I'm being mean-spirited? I think that you are being non-altruistic. The 64-megabit question is whether the only alternative is to be mean-spirited. I consider this a false dichotomy and therefore you are not. That was the short answer; the long answer is _Atlas Shrugged_ by Ayn Rand. [Moderator's Note: Ah yes, the Socially Responsible people. I haven't picked on them in awhile even though they've sent a few commentaries I've run here. Maybe it is time to start on them again! :) PAT] ------------------------------ From: puma@netcom.com (Gary Breuckman) Subject: Re: Looking For PC Voicemail Card Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 13:28:39 GMT In article jjr@wixer.bga.com (Jeffrey J. Radice) writes: > I'm attempting to set up a friend's business for voicemail using his > computer, so he doesn't have the overhead of paying a service for the > same. I am not entirely familiar with the hardware, and software > required to do such a feat through a PC. I've had experience with both the 'Complete PC' and it's variations, and the new 'National TY-IN' board. Complete PC makes several boards, the 'complete answering machine' which is voicemail only, the 'complete pc' which is voicemail, modem, and fax, and several other combinations of the above. The software is very nice, it allows many mailboxes (hundreds?), you can designate different passwords for each for retrieving messages, there are options to forward messages to another number once received. You can set up a specific mailbox for fax and modem each, so the user would dial that mailbox and be connected to the appropriate signal (internal on the board, not an external fax/modem). I understand the newer versions of the board may be able to detect fax (CNG tone) and modems (reverse modem tone) automatically. The board can also take a list of numbers and dial each with a message (illegal for advertising in some areas, but nice for a club hotline, etc), at the end of the message it can ask for a confirming touchtone or take a message back. The NATIONAL board has not-as-nice software, but it's new. It does automatic fax recognition, and the next software release may do automatic modem recognition. It does NOT forward messages or do outbound calling, but that's all in software and it might eventually. The sound quality on outgoing messages is better than COMPLETE -- it uses different compression on outgoing (where quality is important) and incoming (where it's not AS important). The National board is under $200, the complete board runs from about the same place to more, depending on options. puma@netcom.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 10:39:19 EDT From: schwartz@nynexst.com (Steven Schwartz) Subject: Re: Free French Phone Information From Publiphone In article is written: > Yes, I am also aware of Minitel, out here in Santa Maria, California, > USA. While on a Paris BBS a while back, I downloaded an IBM emuation > of Minitel, and enables you to log onto the service via your IBM. The > Minitel Emulator is very well designed and iconified. I'm looking, > right now, for a Minitel access number in France. Can you help me > out? There are Minitel access nodes in New York. If you really want a France phone number, they can probably get it for you. Call Minitel at 212-399-0080 (voice) for information. Steven H. Schwartz Expert Systems Laboratory schwartz@nynexst.com NYNEX Science and Technology Center PROFS: SCHWARTZ@UNIX 500 Westchester Avenue 914-644-2960 White Plains NY 10604 ------------------------------ From: Bruce Taylor Subject: Re: Video Conference Standards Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 12:02:42 -0400 Organization: Telecommunications, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA (SG3) is best suited for lower speed connections (ie: 2*56 kbps, 384kbps, appears to be no difference if run at 768 kbps). CLI, on the other hand, appears to have a protocol optimized for higher bandwidth connections; from 1.5Mbps down to 768 kbps, and perhaps 384 kbps as a lower limit. 112kbps connections are very poor, in my opinion. The two systems degrade in differing ways: PictureTel degrades image quality (fuzziness) when too many elements are changing for a given bandwidth, but the frame rate remains constant. CLI keeps the image sharp, but the fram rate slows, leading to 'strobing' effects, under similar circumstances. Given our choice of bandwidth here at CMU (2*56 or 112kbps via Northern Telecom's Datapath product), we seem to have settled on the PictureTel equipment. The audio system is simple and adequate, and the units are relatively portable. We have two model 400s, a classroom system with 46" monitor, and a model 100 (which is not nearly as useful as the 400, by the way). As for standards interoperability, there is the CCITT (yes, I know they changed the name, but darn it... :-) H.261 standard, also known as P*64 in the PictureTel world. This is a least common denominator standard, and the picture quality is not wonderful. But it works. Good for connections to Europe and the Pacific Rim. There is a second CCITT standard (H.360?) for the higher order functionality, such as remote camera controls, etc. I believe that this new standard is being introduced into recent releases of firmware from the manufacturers. Overall, 2*56 kbps is fine for small group interactions, but has difficulty in dealing with, say, a twelve member panel on each end. You may wish to consider the future addition of an inverse multiplexer, to allow ganging of several 56 kbps lines together to provide partial T-1 bandwidth on demand. Best wishes, Bruce Taylor (blt@cmu.edu) (412) 268-6249 New Projects Coordinator, Telecommunications, Carnegie Mellon University ------------------------------ From: Jim.Rees@umich.edu Subject: Re: Status of Cellular Data Date: 16 Aug 1993 18:57:32 GMT Organization: University of Michigan CITI In article , sorbrrse@sand.rtsg.mot.com (Russell E. Sorber) writes: > NAMPS does do modem traffic in the same way as traditional AMPs (modem > over analog voice). Have you actually tried it, or are you just repeating what you've heard? My guess is that the narrower deviation will result in greater phase distortion, which will result in poorer performance of standard modems. I would be surprised if you could get v.32 speeds out of a NAMPS system. I would be curious to hear from anyone who has tried a v.32 or v.32bis modem over NAMPS. > GSM digital systems are in commercial operation... Because > of the US frequency allocation differences and the large,imcompatible, > AMPS base in the US it will not be deployed here. I agree that we won't ever get GSM here, but your reasons don't make sense. GSM could be deployed in US frequency allocations easily enough. And any digital system will be incompatible with AMPS, so that's not a reason to favor (for example) TDMA over GSM. ------------------------------ From: Robert Eden Subject: Re: MCI PC Connect Plan (Eight Cents/Min Evening/Night/Weekend) Date: 16 Aug 93 10:44:50 CST Organization: Texas Utilities, Glen Rose TX In article , st1r8@elroy.uh.edu (B.J. Guillot) writes: > MCI PC Connect(sm) FEE/RATES: > ============================= > PC Connect Customer to NON-PC Connect Customer: > ----------------------------------------------- > $0.22 during Day (Mon-Fri: 8am - 5pm) > $0.10 during E/N/W (Mon-Fri: 5pm-8am: Sat/Sun: 24 hours) That's about what I pay for current MCI LD calls (plan+F&F). With two PC connect customers, it's a little cheaper (.02 a minute). Where's the beef? (or significant savings over normal LD) Robert Eden 817-897-0491 Glen Rose, TX Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station robert@cpvax.cpses.tu.com ------------------------------ From: marshall@cs.iastate.edu (Bill Marshall) Subject: Re: Flooding in the Midwest Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 19:47:50 GMT > [Moderator's Note: Regards the unfortunate people around Des Moines > and the upper part of the river which flooded first, has the water > gone down any at all? The water has dropped in Des Moines. People are continuing the cleanup process and the main water works is back up to full force. May areas are debating if they will stay in their current locations, but most are. The Iowa City area (East central Iowa) is still having water problems. Heavy rains last week caused the river to rise higher than ever before this summer. Maybe someone from the University of Iowa could give details. Here in Ames, the river is out of it's banks (again), but was not doing major damage, as of this morning. Iowa is still very wet and any new rains cause problems. Thanks for any support, Bill Marshall Computer Science Department Iowa State University marshall@cs.iastate.edu [Moderator's Note: The American Red Cross is still making appeals for assistance with the midwest flooding. They need cash. PAT] ------------------------------ From: cogorno@netcom.com (Steve Cogorno) Subject: Re: Local Calls via LD Carrier? Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 15:06:04 PDT > Assuming you are properly registered with the carrier, which is > certainly true if you have selected them as your equal access LD > carrier, you can force intra-lata calls to be carried by them, rather > than your default regional carrier, by pressing the access code prior > to placing any (all) phone call. 503-555-1212 would be routed to your > selected LD carrier, 525-1212 would probably be handled by your local > carrier. 10288#525-1212 would force the call to be passed to AT&T for > handling, rahter than allowing your local carrier to decide whether to > handle or pass. I don't beliece that this holds true in all cases; Pacific Bell for example, has switches that are smart enough to kick out 102881 before intra-LATA calls. If you want to use AT&T for a call that Pacific Bell would normally handle, you must dial (800) 321-0288 and follow the instructions. I have also been told that you can use 950 codes (Cable & Wireless is rather agressive about letting people know about this, but they are barred from specifically marketing it. I think you need to have a reason; ie: using their call accounting which Pac Bell can't provide.) Steve cogorno@netcom.com [Moderator's Note: Steve, your address above is bad. It appears to be an error in your .forward file and the script it feeds. Your mail has been bouncing today. Something to do with Procmail getting it. PAT] ------------------------------ From: Jim.Rees@umich.edu Subject: Re: Cellular Conversation Results in Arrest Date: 16 Aug 1993 22:45:37 GMT Organization: University of Michigan CITI In article , LESREEVES@delphi.com writes: > Two teenagers have been arrested and charged with the murder of > Michael Jordan's father. The news reports say that the content of > conversations made from Mr. Jordan's cellular phone led to the arrest. > Have similar cases not been thrown out when it was revealed that > cellular phones were monitored? That's not what the reports I saw said. The {Chicago Tribune} and the {Detroit Free Press} both said that it was the call detail (when and where the calls were made to) rather than the contents that led to the suspects. I don't think this amounts to illegal search, especially since the records being searched belonged to the victim. In fact, it seems unlikely that the calls were monitored, since no one even knew a crime had been committed at the time the calls were made. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 18:02:21 CDT From: varney@ihlpe.att.com Subject: Re: IEEE Editor Responds to J. Adams; Call For Papers Organization: AT&T In article nancyg@banshee.bellcore.com (Nancy Griffeth) writes: > In article , jadams@athens.cc.bellcore. >com (adams ,john) writes: ^^^^^^^^^^^ Also known as Jack Adams >> Yesterday's snail mail brought (unshredded for a change) concurrent >> issues from the IEEE highlighting research into a growing topic of >> concern within the industry, Feature Interaction within the public >> network. Appropriately, the IEEE Computer Magazine's cover chose a >> "house of cards" illustration to bring attention to the seriousness of >> the potential problem. Note that in many cases, the "seriousness" only means that some combination of Features does not act in a manner assumed by some customer of the TELCo. When most folks read the referenced papers, that's what they are thinking about. But Jack's comments changed my thinking to another form of "Feature Interaction" -- see below. >> Having read the guest editor's introductions and the two tutorial >> articles, I'm inclined to believe that there isn't much practical >> information beyond these. It's a shame that the editor's couldn't >> have included some of the practical initiatives underway within the >> industry. >> The Internetwork Interoperability Test Program (IITP) is >> making very strong contributions to insuring the integrity of the >> underlying SS7 network in the US. When I first read this, Jack, I disagreed -- and would have told you so at the last meeting. But I've had time to re-think protocol testing as a "feature interaction" problem, and believe this is something overlooked by many standards groups. While many protocol problems are the result of poor requirements or implementations, there are more and more of them showing up as interaction problems (failed calls or unanticipated handling of calls). > As one of the co-editors of this issue, I agree that it's a shame that > we couldn't have included more work on initiatives that are underway. > .... We were quite disappointed at the small response from Bellcore. Note that Bellcore is constrained in much of their industry research by legal agreements on the use/distribution of their cooperative efforts with various vendors. This area has a lot going on, but not much of an avenue for publishing results. As I understand it, Bellcore would be happy if the only results were better quality requirements to vendors (and I would be overjoyed at such an improvement!!!). Unfortunately, the current lack of real feedback to Bellcore in the requirements cycle will probably prevent a dramatic improvement in the near (five year) term. Only when Bellcore can address questions that come up during DEVELOPMENT can the problem be truely addressed. Anything else (such as the current process) is based on correct and complete requirements reaching developers at the beginning of development. (Software engineering, NOT!!) > In an open telecommunications network, feature interactions will be > far more likely and also more dangerous than they are at present. We > doubt that the efforts of any single organization will suffice to > solve the problem, and since it's quite an interesting and important > one, so we are hoping to attract attention from outside the industry > and even from computer scientists who have no previous background in > telecommunications. Assuming Bellcore allows Jack some time away from the current workload, I think Nancy's suggestion is a timely one. Note that IITP is primarily a test effort, and not an attempt to improve the SS7 protocol prior to implementation. But it would provide some insight into the interaction problems in even a relatively easy area. One thing I didn't see stated directly in the IEEE articles is the fact that even when interactions are obvious, it is NOT EASY to determine the "correct" manner of interaction. It is not unusual for two or more ways of resolving an interaction to each have support in the telephony industry. Al Varney - just my opinion ------------------------------ From: mho@ficus.CS.UCLA.EDU (Mike Ho) Subject: Re: FCC Equal Access Order Date: 16 Aug 93 23:43:22 GMT *IF* I am reading this correctly, this order appears to prohibit the practice of charging 75 cents to reach an "800" number from inside a hotel, at least to the extent that the "800" number is used to reach a telephone company. I have read the stuff around the relevant sections (which are quoted below), and I'm confident that I didn't quote out of context -- however, set me straight if I did. Does this effectively prohibit charges for 800/950 calls from inside a hotel/ university? If so, an FCC rep that I complained to a year ago gave me the wrong answer. * * * D. Restrictions on Charges (explaining Sec. 64.705) 24. The prohibition.... Finally, by prohibiting aggregators from imposing surcharges on access code calls that are not charged for calls using the presubscribed OSPs, the Commission further ensures that consumers have the ability to choose their preferred carrier in a competitive marketplace. Sec. 64.705 Restrictions on charges related to the provision of operator services. (b) An aggregator shall ensure that no charge by the aggregator to the consumer for using an "800" or "950" access code number, or any other access code number, is greater than the amount the aggregator charges for calls placed using the presubscribed provider of operator services. ------------------------------ From: pjp@netcom.com (jack pines) Subject: Re: ADSI-Protocol Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 00:10:59 GMT In article A.Leene@research.ptt.nl (Arnaud Leene) writes: > ... deleted stuff about what ADSI does ... > It is unclear to me what the status of ADSI is at the moment. I have > the following questions: > - Is ADSI alreay a (Bellcore) standard? Yes, if they publish it, it is a spec. This doesn't mean they won't change it. > - Will ADSI be implemented by the RBOC's? When? Not necessary, the beauty of ADSI is that an ADSI server can talk to an ADSI client over the existing physical plant. > - Are there any pilots in the U.S.? You could implement your own, the first out will probably be home banking. > - Who will deliver Customer Premises Equipment? There are several large phone makers rumored to have prototypes already, ie NT and Panasonic. The only one I know of that you can buy now is made by Philips for $700+ I think. Jack Pines pjp@netcom.com ------------------------------ From: warren@cyberspace.com (Warren Victorian) Subject: Last Laugh! Here We Go Again: What Are these? Date: 16 Aug 1993 20:57:03 -0700 Organization: (CYBERSPACE) Public Internet 206.286.1600 I found these wierd international phone sex lines in a magazine the otherday and I was just wondering how these people can offer a service like this for free. It makes no sense to me. Anyways it is pretty hardcore and anyone into that type of stuff should give it a shout. 011-censored by Moderator or 011-censored by Moderator [Moderator's Note: Gosh, not this one again. What's up Warren? Did Seth leave and get another job, or is this his day off? Since I assume you *know* how it is done (Lord knows everyone else on the net knows by now), I won't bother to explain it again. I deleted those numbers again also. If you are really serious, and asking a legitimate question, I refer you for answers to the California Department of Sex and Sleaze Phone Services, 900 Number Bureau. Ask for advice on how to operate a Cash Cow and get Lots of Money by ripping off callers for hot chat at $3.49 per minute. Ask how to do it so it can be kept secret as to who really owns it and if you need to pay taxes on all that money or not. PAT] ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #581 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa24818; 17 Aug 93 12:57 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA11170 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Mon, 16 Aug 1993 23:59:10 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA13104 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Mon, 16 Aug 1993 23:58:31 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 23:58:31 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308170458.AA13104@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #580 TELECOM Digest Mon, 16 Aug 93 23:58:30 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 580 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Line Noise and Repair Service (Carl Oppedahl) Phones Swamped When Elvis Died (Carl Moore) Need Information on Very Old Plug Switchboard (David Nichols) Integrators Wanted (Timothy Ritchey) Should I Get a Separate Line For Modem? (Rajappa Iyer) Motorola PC-550 "Flip-Phone" Test Mode (Pat Barron) Wanted - Handheld Cell Phone - No Programming Adapter (Tom Perrine) Cellular Phones: Nokia 210 vs Motorola DPC (Stephane Gauvin) Fidonet Specs Wanted (Rich Bauer) AT&T Buys McCaw (Cellular One) (Bryan D. Boyle) Re: Federal Register On Line? (Harold Hallikainen) Northern Telecom Sells Direct in U.S. (Nigel Allen) Wait! Let me Get a Pen! (Adam Shostack) Re: My Idea to Stop Cellular Fraud (Jim Rees) Re: My Idea to Stop Cellular Fraud (Joel Upchurch) Re: ANAC Codes by NPA (Scott D. Fybush) Re: ANAC Codes by NPA (Peter Simpsom) Re: Central Office Tours? (Brent Laminack) Re: 10xxx NOT Allowed on 1-800 (Al Varney) Re: Cellular Conversation Results in Arrest (Steven H. Lichter) Re: Attleboro or South Attleboro (Cliff Barney) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: oppedahl@panix.com (Carl Oppedahl) Subject: Line Noise and Repair Service Date: 16 Aug 1993 08:33:14 -0400 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC More annoying service from NY Tel. For weeks I had been noticing that from time to time, for no apparent reason, the SQ (signal quality) light on my ZyXEL would flicker. This was while calling from my office in the 212-777 exchange. I make brief calls to lots of modem places, but most of my lengthy modem calls are to panix, so I guess it should not be so surprising that I would notice the SQ flickering mostly while calling panix. Then EC (error correction) would blink, showing a retrain in progress, and often HS (high speed) would blink, showing a speed negotiation. Usually I would end up back at a high speed connection. On another of my lines, I was getting occasional clicks and faint crosstalk of voices that I did not recognize. Finally, last Friday, on the third of my lines, I would pick up the phone and hear a modem call in progress. Or fax, I suppose, but it sounded more like modem to me. And at that moment I was doing no modem work at all. So I called up friendly old NY Tel. The woman took the repair order, and promised it would be fixed by afternoon. I asked that she have a repair foreman call me back. No call came, of course. My telephones have lights that indicate whether the line is in use. They do this in a fairly simple way, merely noting if the line voltage has dropped below about 15 volts. The next thing out of the ordinary was to see the line-in-use lights flickering on and off for the second line mentioned above -- the one with the clicks and faint cross-talk. By the end of the day, there was still no callback from the repair foreman, even after second and third requests by me. Finally at 7PM in the evening, two repair techs showed up. One of them did nothing -- just sat around taking up floor space. The other one actually did work -- performing tests on the three telephone lines from the cross-connect in the basement of my apartment building. All three lines had substantial imbalances, one with a nearly-perfect short to ground. These tests were done with and without the apartment wiring connected, to confirm that the apartment wiring was not the cause of the problem. In each case the conclusion was that the problem was in the wiring between my basement and the central office. The fix for this, of course, is to use different pairs between the basement and the central office. But moving to different pairs requires warm bodies in two places -- my basement and the central office. It took until the following morning to get the three phone lines switched over to good pairs. The phone company's failure to send the repair tech out when promised, its failure to give a repair foreman callback even after three requests, and its inability to move three pairs during one repair session, all stand for poor service. But now I do seem to have three clear phone lines again. So all's well that ends well, eh? Carl Oppedahl AA2KW (patent lawyer) 1992 Commerce Street #309 Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-4412 voice 212-777-1330 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 9:21:12 EDT From: Carl Moore Subject: Phones Swamped When Elvis Died Among the special TV and radio items on yesterday (Aug. 15) about Elvis Presley was a 1977 broadcast from Memphis announcing his death; it included a public appeal not to make unnecessary phone calls, because of the Memphis area being swamped with calls as a result of Elvis' death (Aug. 16, 1977). I have not heard of any such thing happening when John Lennon was shot and killed very late Dec. 8, 1980 in New York. I did hear there was not much going as a result at the answering service which is still handling my incoming calls, but that is over 100 miles away from New York. I do know that fans gathered outside the Dakota, where Lennon lived, but it seems to me that he was more reclusive than Elvis. (As for that answering service, the big crush was caused March 30, 1981 by the wounding of President Reagan.) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 09:37:19 EDT From: daven@sunrock.East.Sun.COM (David Nichols {Prof Services} Sun Rochester) Subject: Need Information on Very Old Plug Switchboard I am about to acquire a very old plug switchboard (as soon as I can get it from North Dakota to New York) and need any info on plug switchboards I can get. I don't know much about it yet, other than it is a "Kellog" made in Chicago, IL. From the pictures, it doesn't look like it has any lights. My ultimate goal is to set it up in my house as a working antique. Any ideas about how realistic this might be? Other interesting things I noted in two pictures: The microphone dangles on a boom in front of the operator and the earpiece is separate like the kind on the old "candlestick" telephones. Also, there appears to be two cranks. Given this brief amount of information, anyone know what this might be worth (for insurance purposes)? Please respond directly to me as it is hard for me to keep up with the Digest. Thanks! David Nichols dave.nichols@east.sun.com ------------------------------ From: 00tdritchey@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu Subject: Integrators Wanted Date: 16 Aug 93 09:57:46 EST Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's I was wondering if anyone knew of a list of telecomunication integrators which might be on the 'net? If anyone could be helpful in this arena I would be greatful. Timothy Ritchey Archaeological Resources Management Service Ball State University Muncie, Indiana 47306 (317) 285-5328 INTERNET: 00tdritchey@bsuvc.bsu.edu ------------------------------ From: Rajappa Iyer Subject: Should I Get a Separate Line For Modem? Date: 16 Aug 93 15:23:40 GMT Organization: NCR Corp., Network Products - San Diego What are the pros and cons of using the same telephone number for both the modem and voice? I really don't want to miss calls while I am on the modem. Would call waiting help? Any input on this will be apprec- iated. Thanks, Rajappa Iyer (iyer@npg-sd.ScrippsRanchCA.NCR.COM - on assignment at NCR) [Moderator's Note: Call waiting would NOT be helpful. Everytime you got a call waiting it would knock the modem off the line. I think most people are in agreement that if you can afford two lines and have the wire facilities for it, do it that way, having one line for voice and one line for modem/fax and/or voice overflow. Voice line first, set to hunt to the second line when busy, or else voice line first, with call-waiting on it, but not the second line. PAT] ------------------------------ From: Pat_Barron@transarc.com Subject: Motorola PC-550 "Flip-Phone" Test Mode Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 14:24:38 -0400 Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA Can anyone tell me about the "manual test mode" on the PC-550 flip-phone? It seems to be a special programming mode that is accessed by shorting one of the pins on the battery connector to ground (or pushing a button on a special test battery). Some vague reference to it is made in an addendum to the users' manual where they talk about "C Scan", but they only give exactly enough information to get the C Scan feature set up, and don't tell you anything else about it. Does anyone have a list of what one can do in this test mode? Thanks, Pat ------------------------------ From: tep@SDSC.EDU (Tom Perrine) Subject: Wanted - Handheld Cell Phone - No Programming Adapter Date: 17 Aug 1993 00:48:18 GMT Organization: San Diego Supercomputer Center, San Diego CA I'm in the maket for a new phone. I have a bag phone, and want an additional, handheld phone. I like the Oki's but, $$$ ... I don't need more than two NAMS, don't care about alphanumeric (or other) directories, I just want a fairly light (smaller than the Motorola brick), basic phone. I also want one that doesn't require a programming adapter. Any recommendations? (Please cc: replies to tep@sdsc.edu) Thanks! Tom E. Perrine (tep@SDSC.EDU) Voice: +1 619 534-8328 San Diego Supercomputer Center FAX: +1 619 534-5152 P. O. Box 85608 San Diego CA 92186-9784 ------------------------------ From: GAUVINS@vm1.ulaval.ca (Stephane Gauvin) Subject: Cellular Phones: Nokia 210 vs Motorola DPC Organization: Universite Laval Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 00:37:24 GMT I am shopping for a *small* cellular phone. Two models seem to fit the bill better than others: Motorola DPC, and Nokia 121. I would appreciate any firsthand comment on these phones, pointers to magazine reviews or to ftp archives (I've looked into telecom.archives, but there is so much stuff in there I couldn't tell where/if there are reviews). I'll be a light user (less than an hour a month), only interested in placing calls, so autonomy is not a major issue. The phone will be used in well covered areas, so power is not a major issue either. I am looking for a small, reliable, trouble-free unit. Will, maybe, shell out more money to link a laptop. My first impression is that the design of the DPC is more ergonomic than the Nokia's, but the flip-phone may also be more vulnerable to bad treatments. Thanks, Stephane ------------------------------ From: root@cpp.PHA.PA.US (Rich Bauer) Subject: Fidonet Specs Wanted Organization: Critical Path Project Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 02:18:34 GMT Where can I obtain complete technical descriptions (and/or code) for writing applications which interface with the FIDONET network ? ------------------------------ From: bdboyle@erenj.com (Bryan D. Boyle) Subject: AT&T Buys McCaw (Cellular One) Organization: Exxon Research and Engineering Co., NJ Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 22:48:30 GMT So, AT&T, rather than fighting, bought McCaw Communications today for $12 billion. Now, this is interesting news. (Heck, Cellular One (the child most known by consumers) only recently got it right ... now the big mother takes it over and turns it into a grey, colorless, boring company. Oh well ... time to switch to the wireline company here (Bell Atlantic). Bryan D. Boyle Physical: ER&E, Annandale, NJ 08801 #include Logical: Cogito sum, ergo sum, cogito. 908 730 3338 Virtual: bdboyle@erenj.com ------------------------------ From: hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) Subject: Re: Federal Register On Line? Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 05:49:58 GMT In article Jim.Rees@umich.edu writes: > I found a gopher server that has a link to the Federal Register, but > the link doesn't point at anything. So someone probably has this > online but I don't know how to get at it. > The gopher is at gopher.netsys.com, port 2001, if anyone wants to > pursue it. Wow! Is the Federal Register on line somewhere? It would sure save me a lot of trips to the library and digging thru microfiche! Harold Hallikainen ap621@Cleveland.Freenet.edu Hallikainen & Friends, Inc. hhallika@oboe.calpoly.edu 141 Suburban Road, Bldg E4 phone 805 541 0200 fax 544 6715 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-7590 telex 4932775 HFI UI ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 03:23 EDT From: ae446@freenet.carleton.ca (Nigel Allen) Subject: Northern Telecom Sells Direct in U.S. Organization: Echo Beach Northern Telecom has set up a toll-free number (1-800-842-7439) so that residential and small business customers in the U.S. can order directly from the company. I don't expect Northern Telecom to offer a similar service for residential customers in Canada because its residential telephones have good distribution through telephone company retail outlets and department stores. ------------------------------ From: adam@bwh.harvard.edu (Adam Shostack) Subject: Wait! Let me Get a Pen! Reply-To: adam@das.harvard.edu Organization: Brigham & Womens Hospital, Boston Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 22:09:41 GMT I got the following message earlier today: "The number you have reached, 234-5678, has been changed. The new number is 234-5678. Please make a note of it." (The number has been changed to protect the innocent.) Adam Shostack adam@das.harvard.edu ------------------------------ From: Jim.Rees@umich.edu Subject: Re: My Idea to Stop Cellular Fraud Date: 16 Aug 1993 22:51:08 GMT Organization: University of Michigan CITI In article , linley@netcom.com (Bruce James Robert Linley) writes: > How about having the user pick some secret code when they first > activate their cell phone. This code is used as a seed value for a > psuedo-random number generating algorithm present in the cell phone > and at the cell company... This is old technology. There are several cellular phone systems already in common use, such as GSM, that use a challenge-response authentication system similar to the one you describe. I think GSM goes a step further, and puts the key onto a smart card. You can then insert this card into any phone, and make calls that get billed to your account. Authentication schemes were already well understood at the time that AMPS was designed. The fact that something like this isn't used in the US borders on criminal negligence, in my opinion. ------------------------------ Subject: Re: My Idea to Stop Cellular Fraud From: upchrch!joel@peora.sdc.ccur.com (Joel Upchurch) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 03:11:18 EDT Organization: Upchurch Computer Consulting, Orlando FL linley@netcom.com (Bruce James Robert Linley) writes: > How about having the user pick some secret code when they first > activate their cell phone. This code is used as a seed value for a > psuedo-random number generating algorithm present in the cell phone > and at the cell company. When the user makes a call, the algorithm > generates a new psuedo-random number based on the previous > psuedo-random number and the initially chosen seed. It sounds fine to me, in fact as I recall I used a system where they used a similar system to generate secure passwords. Of course I had to have a special calculator, which I called my Captain Midnight Decoder Ring, to login. The problem, as I see it, is that phony ESNs are usually used for roaming, which mean that the local cell would have to communicate back to the home area of the user to get the appropriate code. As I understand it, they don't do that now, so that would be a major redesign of the system. If they did, I suspect they wouldn't need the passwords. The computers would say the equivalent of, "He's roaming over there? He's making a phone call here right now!" and shut down the ESN. As I understand it, roaming charges sometimes take weeks to show up on the user's bill. If roaming charges were reported back to user's cellular company the same day they were incurred, I suspect this would cut out most of the fraud, if the cellular companies computers were programmed to search for and act on discrepancies in billing information. If a user is making a call in N.Y. and roaming in L.A. at the same time (adjusted for time zones), it wouldn't take much to figure out there is a problem. (If your mail bounces use the address below.) Joel Upchurch/Upchurch Computer Consulting/718 Galsworthy/Orlando, FL 32809 joel@peora.ccur.com {uiucuxc,hoptoad,petsd,ucf-cs}!peora!joel (407) 859-0982 ------------------------------ From: fybush@world.std.com (Scott D Fybush) Subject: Re: ANAC Codes by NPA Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 01:19:03 GMT Another note on the ANAC list. In Eastern Massachusetts (617/508), ANAC can be obtained in two ways: 220 or 200-222-2222. Some people dial 220-XXXX to avoid having to wait for a timeout. I prefer to dial 220#. The "220-2622" given in the list is a specific example of the 220-XXXX method. There is no 617-220 or 508-220 exchange. And in NPA 716, the use of 511 for ANAC is limited to Rochester Telephone areas. ------------------------------ From: peter@rental.usa.3com.com (Peter Simpsom) Subject: Re: ANAC Codes by NPA Date: 16 Aug 93 11:39:31 GMT Reply-To: peter@rental.usa.3com.com Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. In article LESREEVES@delphi.com writes: > Area Code / ANAC # to dial Area Code / ANAC # to dial 508 260-2622 (tht's 260-ANAC :-) Peter Simpson Peter_simpson@3com.com ------------------------------ From: brent@cc.gatech.edu (Brent Laminack) Subject: Re: Central Office Tours? Organization: Georgia Tech College of Computing Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 01:08:59 GMT > I got tours of step offices in the SF east bay (Moraga is one > I recall) when I was in high school. Also, in London (England) in > 1986, I visited a museum of science and technology. They had some > step equipment on display. Any museums like that around the US? In the parking/retail/auditorium building of the Southern Bell headquarters here in Atlanta is a small telephone museum that is free and open to the public during normal business hours. They have step equipment on display. It's basically just one big room with a bunch of displays, but well worth the time if you're in the neighborhood. Brent Laminack (brent@cc.gatech.edu) ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 15 Aug 93 23:29:51 CDT From: varney@ihlpe.att.com Subject: Re: 10xxx NOT Allowed on 1-800 Organization: AT&T In article 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM writes: > The other day at my office I needed to dial AT&T's switch on > 1-800-321-0288, and by mistake I started to dial 10 as in a 10xxx > code. Since 10xxx doesn't matter on 1-800, I figured I'd just keep > dialing and it would be ignored. Part way through it 'supervised' or > whatever you call the click that you get when the phone system has > decided you've finished dialing. > I tried the same thing on my home phone which is not a C&P Government > Centrex and got the same result. > [dialed] and heard a 'click' indicating the switch had completed the > connection. The recording I got said the call I made 'could not be > reached with the carrier access code you dialed.' > In short, despite the fact that 10xxx codes are irrelevant for 1-800 > numbers, you cannot dial a 10xxx code ahead of a 1-800 number in C&P > Telephone area; the switch here will not allow it. Bellcore believes that permitting the dialing of "10XXX" on calls where "10XXX" is irrelevant is misleading to the caller, and could lead one to the conclusion that the selected carrier is somehow involved in the call. That's why the LSSGR indicates a requirement to allow 10XXX to be blocked on 1-800 and other related types of calls. On the other hand, they say that even though 10XXX has no effect on a call to "911", such calls should be completed by ignoring the 10XXX -- in this case, the "emergency" overides the "confusion about carrier selection". If you believe Bellcore is incorrect in it's requirements, you can write to them and explain why the requirements should be changed. Or you could explain the same thing to C&P/Bell Atlantic. But it had better be a really GOOD reason -- not just your irritation at mis-dialing. Al Varney - just my opinion ------------------------------ From: co057@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steven H. Lichter) Subject: Re: Cellular Conversation Results in Arrest Date: 16 Aug 1993 05:16:40 GMT Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA) In the news reports the police got the cellular phone records and put pressure on the people that were called. I'm sure that is very legal. Steven H. Lichter GTECalif COEI ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 15 Aug 93 22:56:32 PDT From: Cliff Barney Subject: Re: Attleboro or South Attleboro Ah, the Attleboros ... as it happens, there are three of them, North Attleboro, Attleboro, and South Attleboro. They are in Massachusetts, on the Rhode Island line, and the Pawtucket, RI {Times}, right on the other side of that line, gives them routine coverage, or did when I worked there long ago. To separate the towns, the paper referred to North Attleboro and South Attleboro as "North" and "South," a practice that eventually led to the memorable headline, "Car hits North pole". Maybe you had to be there. [Moderator's Note: Newspaper headlines can be very funny at times, and occassionally it is quite by accident until after people see it in print. I am reminded of a headline in the {Chicago Daily News} in May, 1935: Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb were both in prison here for the sex-slaying eleven years earlier of fourteen year old Bobby Franks, the grandson of Julius Rosenwald, a vice-president of Sears, Roebuck and founder of the Museum of Science and Industry. A homosexual tryst with another inmate in the Joliet Peniteniary led to the stabbing death of Richard Loeb that day in 1935. Now as all grammarians know, and quite a few have reminded me, one must never end a sentence with a preposition, although Moderators can be excused occassionally if they do. How did the {Daily News} headline read when reporting Loeb's death? "Child Killer Loeb Ends Sentence With a Proposition". The editor later insisted it was unintended. :) PAT] ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #580 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa29444; 17 Aug 93 20:56 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA15020 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 18:04:54 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA11584 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 18:04:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 18:04:15 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308172304.AA11584@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #583 TELECOM Digest Tue, 17 Aug 93 18:04:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 583 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Bellcore to Yield NPA Duties (Wall St. Journal via Jonathan Rosenberg) Any Details on US West's Omaha Broadband Trial? (Will Dye) Questions About Regular Old 'Snail Mail' (Peter Rukavina) Caller-ID Box With a Serial Port (Russell Kroll) UUNet 900 Seems to be a Bad Idea (Bob Frankston) An Open Letter to Postmaster@cyberspace.com (Frank Vance) Junk Mail and the Net (Jerry Leichter) Re: Central Office Tours? (Steven L. Spak) Re: Central Office Tours? (Russell Sharpe) Re: Central Office Tours? (David Josephson) Re: Central Office Tours? (Tom Coradeschi) Re: Need Information on Very Old Plug Switchboard (Al Varney) Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal (Macy Hallock) Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal (Russell Sharpe) Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal (Mike King) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Jonathan Rosenberg Subject: Bellcore to Yield NPA Duties Organization: Bellcore Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 14:11:29 GMT Wall Street Journal:New York-NY 08/17/93 P B5 In a letter sent to James Quello, chairman of the FCC, Bellcore's President George Heilmeier said Bellcore no longer wants to administer the North American Numbering Plan, the master plan for handing out area codes and telephone carrier identification codes. Dr. Heilmeier cited changes in the industry and an increasing number of claims -- "without basis" -- that Bellcore might favor the Bell companies or local telephone companies. According to Dr. Heilmeier, the combination "has convinced Bellcore and its owners that it would be wise to establish a plan for transferring" administration of the numbering plan. The transition is expected to take a year to 18 months. ------------------------------ From: willdye@helios.unl.edu (Will Dye) Subject: Any Details on US West's Omaha Broadband Trial? Date: 17 Aug 1993 08:54:05 GMT Organization: University of Nebraska--Lincoln I'm job hunting, trying to find a position developing interactive television and other broadband services. I have a degree in Multimedia Computing, and some programming experience. I've sent a resume to U S West, and I'm trying to find out more about what they're doing to develop broadband. I've read about their broadband trial in Omaha, but I can find very few details on what services they will offer, what hardware platform they will use, or how the software will be developed. I've read {Telephony} and {The Wall Street Journal}, as well as a few other magazines. I'd like to learn as much as I can about them, in case I get an interview. Any suggestions out there on where I can find out more about them, especially their Omaha trial? Any comments on what kind of an employer they are? Thanks in advance. Will willdye@helios.unl.edu ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 11:49:58 -0300 From: caprukav@atlas.cs.upei.ca (Peter Rukavina) Subject: Questions About Regular Old 'Snail Mail' As the response to my 'is there something like comp.dcom.snail-mail' request resulted only in 'why not start one' and 'if you find anything let me know' replies, I though I might post my enquires about 'regular mail' here with hope that they might, in the heady atmosphere of lock-box/flooded river discussion, pass muster. I'm looking for answers to the following: (1) When I get mail from the U.S.A. here in Canada, the reverse side of an envelope usually has small -- 10 to 12 point -- letter codes rubber-stamped on it. What do these codes signify? Can I 'decode' them? (2) Some U.S. zip codes have five digits, others have five and then a hyphen followed by an additional four (this is called 'ZIP + 4' I believe); do all U.S. addresses have a '+ 4' code and only some choose to use it, or are the extra four digits reserved for special purposes? (3) When I send mail to a U.S. address that is incorrect (or the addressee has moved), I often get the letter returned with a large orange sticker across the front with an 'ADDRESS INCORRECT: No forwarding address' on it. Sometimes, though, the sticker says 'ADDRESS INCORRECT: Forwarding Order Expired' and then lists a different address below. My question: I assume that what has happened is that the addressee paid to have their mail forwarded for a time and that time has now lapsed but the referal information has stayed in the postal computers and the address they list is, in fact, the correct one; would it not be more efficient/nicer to all concerned to just forward the mail to the addressee in these cases? It seems silly that a letter to San Diego travels all the way to San Diego, gets the correct address stamped on it and then gets returned all the way to Canada. Am I missing something here? (4) Addresses in the United Kingdom don't seem to have street numbers associated with them as we tend to have here in Canada. An example: 'Hayle Mill, Maidstone, Kent, England.' What is the usual geographic size of the elements of a U.K. address? Is 'Hayle Mill' a single building, a village, a post office? Is Kent a province? Are there no street numbers because postal employees know where everyone is in a give area? (5) Further, the ISO country code for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland is 'UK.' Can I substitute 'UK' for 'England' in the address above, or should I use it in addition thereto? (6) Addresses in Germany seem to have a four digit number in front of the city name (for example: '8000 Munich' or '8070 Ingolstadt'); is this a 'postal code' in the Canadian/British/American sense or does it mean something else? Answers to any and all of these would be appreciated, either by email or to this group as the Moderator advises. Peter Rukavina (pete@crafts-council.pe.ca) [Moderator's Note: We have been a bit off-topic more than usual here in recent days, so personal replies to Peter are probably best. To answer one question though, *all* US places have a nine digit zip with the final four digits optional except in the case of large mailers who use the postal service at a discount. Typically the last four digits narrow down your location to a single building, or a few buildings on one block. PAT] ------------------------------ Subject: Caller-ID Box With a Serial Port From: cmptech!rkroll@csn.org (Russell Kroll) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 10:52:21 MDT Organization: Computech BBS at 719.260.6279 - Colorado Springs, CO Thanks to all who responded. I already have quite a few modems around here, and don't need to get another one just to handle CID. In case others are looking for a source for the Classmate device, here's something that may help: From: carl@lvsun.com (Carl Shapiro) I bought my `ClassMate Model 10 Caller Identifier Computer Interface' by phone from: Bell Atlantic Business Supplies 800 523-0552 -------------- I hope this will hope others with similar intentions. I'm going to give Bell Atlantic a ring on Monday and see how much they want for it. rkroll%cmptech.uucp@csn.org (Russell Kroll) - or - cmptech!rkroll@csn.org This came from Computech BBS .... +1 719.260.6279 in Colorado Springs, CO. ------------------------------ From: Bob_Frankston@frankston.com Subject: UUNet 900 Seems to be a Bad Idea Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 09:21 -0400 As part of my advocacy of 900 alternatives, the UUNet 900 service does present an interesting challenge for those wanting to use a credit card instead of a 900 number. Since the login is accomplished via a UUCP connection script, it seems feasible for UUnet to accept a credit card number as part of the connection sequence. Or even use the credit card information as the "login" line. UUNet could dial out and verify the credit card information before it allows the user to make a transaction. By using a non800 number, the only risk incurred would be the theft of service but UUNet would not be stuck with 800 or 900 number charges if the credit card proved bogus. One more case with 900 numbers seemingly like the obvious solution until you think about alternatives. Personally, as an IP provider the credit card solution seems preferable. Of course, some callers might not have credit cards, but then they shouldn't qualify for credit via 900 either. ------------------------------ From: fvance@wg.waii.com (Frank Vance) Subject: An Open Letter to Postmaster@cyberspace.com Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 08:27:29 -0500 (CDT) Dear Mr. or Ms. Postmaster, One of your users, named Warren Victorian (apparently a pseudonym), sent the following message to the info-convex mailing list and the Internet Engineering Task Force mailing list. Since this message has nothing to do with Convex computers or the IETF, the same message has been sent to countless other mailing lists and newsgroups, and it appears that said "Warren Victorian" has some tie to these numbers, I would ask that you take appropriate action against this individual. According to reports I have seen, this same message has originated from several other sites, and in each case, the site ultimately found it necessary to revoke this user's privledges. Warren Victorian writes: > From info-convex-request@pemrac.space.swri.edu Mon Aug 16 23:54:45 1993 > To: info-convex@pemrac.space.swrc.edu > Date: 16 Aug 1993 21:26:56 -0700 > From: warren@cyberspace.com (Warren Victorian) > Message-Id: <24pmmg$qv@cyberspace.com> > Organization: (CYBERSPACE) Public Internet 206.286.1600 > Sender: info-convex-request@pemrac.space.swri.edu > Subject: What are these? Thank you for your attention, Frank Vance +1.713.963.2426 Western Geophysical FrankVance@bambi.wg.waii.com 10001 Richmond Avenue Fax: +1.713.963.2758 Houston, TX 77042 USA [Moderator's Note: I do *not* recommend that people write to cyberspace administrators to complain, as I am sure they have seen many complaints already on this latest junk posting. People don't need to send me any more copies of the posting either asking 'have you seen this?' PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 07:22:07 EDT From: Jerry Leichter Subject: Junk Mail and the Net I haven't heard much about the infamous "Seth" for a couple of days now, but it seems he broke the ice. The following message was sent to a very-low- volume (20-30 messages/YEAR), purely technical mailing list maintained at Xerox: MAKE a LOVE connection NOW! Here's how YOU can be a part of INTRO-LINE, an amazing new way to meet 100's of people from your area (or from any area you want) for fun, hobbies, pen-pals, phone calls, romance, dating, and MORE! On your first call you'll be able to make contact with people who share similar interests, or who are looking for the same thing you are. You can exchange phone numbers, or you can leave private messages. You'll want to call back regularly to listen to the private messages others will be leaving for you. CALL 1-900-xxx-xxxx, ext yyy NOW! Don't miss your chance to participate in this amazing system! People from all over the US & Canada are waiting to hear from YOU! Special price, this week only $2, 18 and over please. 1-900-xxx-xxxx, ext yyy 18+ yrs Avalon Comm $2/min Ft Lauderdale The sender used the Finish "anonymous poster" server to send the message as an18462@anon.penet.fi. Great. Just what we need: Anonymous, untraceable junk mail. Jerry [Moderator's Note: The way you deal with anonymous junk mail in news is by putting anon.penet.fi and similar services in your kill file, or news admins look for it coming through in the stream and bash it there. I think we will see a number of changes in news as private ownership of the net gets underway. Among other things, a large number of unmoderated newsgroups will be dropped, and requirements for posting will be tightened up. Good idea? No, not really, but I feel it is almost surely bound to happen. I think you will see moderated groups almost exclusively as the century comes to an end. Again, a good idea? No, there is room for almost everyone on this internet; but I don't think the 'powers that be' in the next year or two or three are going to see it that way. :( PAT] ------------------------------ From: sspak@seas.gwu.edu (Steven L. Spak) Subject: Re: Central Office Tours? Organization: George Washington University Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 10:56:29 GMT The Smithsonian Institution here in Washington has an excellent Telephony History exhibit. It's a permanent display too. Steven Spak sspak@seas.gwu.edu Transmission Engineer Tel:(202)392-1611 Fax:(202)392-1261 ------------------------------ From: sharpe_r@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz (Russell Sharpe) Subject: Re: Central Office Tours? Date: 17 Aug 1993 12:47:03 GMT Organization: Wellington City Council, Public Access Reply-To: sharpe_r@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz New Zealand has a collection of equipment ranging from Western Electric Rotary to British Post Office 2000 type Step by Step; also a Grand Collection of manual boards, radio gear and test equipment. Sadly, Telecom New Zealand has stored them, somewhat inadequately out of the public eye, until it is a) sold, or b) given an incentive from the public/government that it is worth seeing. Russell [Moderator's Note: A few years ago Illinois Bell closed down the museum the Telephone Pioneers were operating here so the space could be used for their 'Work at Home Business Center'. PAT] ------------------------------ From: davidj@rahul.net (David Josephson) Subject: Re: Central Office Tours? Organization: a2i network Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 01:46:55 GMT In hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) writes: > In article co057@cleveland.Freenet.Edu > (Steven H. Lichter) writes: >> Yes the step equipment was a lot more interesting. We had mockups of >> switch trains that would let the tours see how the calls went through, >> and there were also contests for free long distance calls. I know it > I got tours of step offices in the SF east bay (Moraga is one > I recall) when I was in high school. Also, in London (England) in > 1986, I visited a museum of science and technology. They had some > step equipment on display. Any museums like that around the US? Also > in high school I recall going to a museum somewhere around San Jose, > CA that had a bunch of old electronics, a lot of Edison's stuff. They > also seemed to have a lot of German music boxes that used disks with > punched holes. So, who's keeping the history for us? Don't know who's keeping the history but: The Museum of American History in Washington (part of the Smithsonian) has a communications exhibit with a working SXS switch that you can dial and call the other phones there. It was dirty and worn-out looking (mostly the plastic covers on things, that were supposed to keep the steppers from getting dirty ;-)) but it worked. There are also demos of the sound of various carrier systems, cable, mux, etc. Not real long on technical info, but it was all there to see and hear. The Electronics Museum in San Jose was, last I heard, in storage and subject of a civic tug-of-war between various benefactors. Probably more people on here who live over on that side of the valley can pipe up about what's happening with it. David Josephson ------------------------------ From: Tom Coradeschi Subject: Re: Central Office Tours? Organization: US Army Armts RD&E Center, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 17:20:33 GMT hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) wrote: > I got tours of step offices in the SF east bay (Moraga is one > I recall) when I was in high school. Also, in London (England) in > 1986, I visited a museum of science and technology. They had some > step equipment on display. Still there as of December 1990. Neat thing about the setup was that you could have it operate at normal speed (ratatatattat-bang!) or at a much reduced (factor of 10?), so you could actually see what was happening:-} Definitely worth the trip! (well, if you're in London, anyhow:-}) tom coradeschi <+> tcora@pica.army.mil <+> DoD #413 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 02:27:20 CDT From: varney@ihlpe.att.com Subject: Re: Need Information on Very Old Plug Switchboard Organization: AT&T In article daven@sunrock.East.Sun.COM (David Nichols {Prof Services} Sun Rochester) writes: > I am about to acquire a very old plug switchboard (as soon as I can > get it from North Dakota to New York) and need any info on plug > switchboards I can get. I don't know much about it yet, other than it > is a "Kellog" made in Chicago, IL. > Given this brief amount of information, anyone know what this might be > worth (for insurance purposes)? > Please respond directly to me as it is hard for me to keep up with the > Digest. I did, but others may want to know as well. Contact: The Museum of Independent Telephony Abilene, KS I don't have their number, but they do have quite a collection of such boards, as well as many other non-AT&T items. :( They are located a short walk from the Eisenhower Museum. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 23:40:17 -0400 (EDT) From: macy@fmsys.fmsystm.ncoast.org (Macy Hallock) Subject: Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal Reply-To: macy@telemax.com Organization: F M Systems/Telemax Medina, Ohio USA In article is written: >> Where can one get ahold of the 'thought and research' that went >> into some of the characteristics of the POTS service? > A good college library should have a set of back issues of the > "Bell System Technical Journal". ... Automatic Electric and ITT published similar journals. These are also worthwhile reading. I spent hundreds of hours reading all of these and more back in college 20+ years ago. (and look where it got me ...) Macy Hallock N8OBG Voice= +1.216.723.3030 Fax= +1.216.723.3223 macy@telemax.com Telemax Inc. and F M Systems Inc. 152 Highland Drive Medina, Ohio 44256 USA ------------------------------ From: sharpe_r@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz (Russell Sharpe) Subject: Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal Date: 17 Aug 1993 12:26:37 GMT Organization: Wellington City Council, Public Access Reply-To: sharpe_r@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz > I always assumed in the old electro-mechanical CO, I found that the > ringing signal followed the ringing current transmission to the called > telephone. In the Stromberg-Carlson exchange I toured years ago, > there was a gear motor driving a row of cams that switched the various > signals, including busy, ringing signal, and ringing current for the > entire exchange. > Can anyone confirm that in some of the old CO, the ringing signal was > actually the 20 Hz ringing current? I was always interested in the > different ringing signal sounds that have been used in different COs. Here in New Zealand, there are still a handful of British Post office SxS switches working. The last one I worked on was in '87. (Since '84 We have been replacing all with NEC NEAX 61 Digital Switches) The ringers were rotary -50v sets (1 active 1 standby) ...tones generated are 400Hz for status tones (dial tone, busy etc.) and 25Hz for ringing current. Cams attached to the end of the motor spindles Generated the necessary Cadences (From memory, there were eight sets of cams). These ringers were mounted on a bench in the Power Room, or alternatively in one above the other in a three foot rack. Incidentally I put the Petone LX (Local Exchange) off the air during routine maintenance. I was woring on one (replacing Cams) when the other failed! (Took three minutes to get it together!) From about 1973 on the NZ Post Office started replacing these with NEC Xbar Which had Solid State Ring Generators, with Relay Chains providing Cadence. Murphy's Law 2020 states: When you have standby equipment out of service, there is a 60% chance that the active will fail. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 13:06:27 EDT From: mking@fsd.com (Mike King) Subject: Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal In TELECOM Digest, V13 #579, EXTMO4H@mizzou1.missouri.edu (Curtis Bohl) wrote: > Can anyone confirm that in some of the old CO, the ringing signal was > actually the 20 Hz ringing current? I was always interested in the > different ringing signal sounds that have been used in different COs. I've always been taught there's two sets of ring buses in a CO switch: one to provide ringing current to the number being signalled, and one to return ringback to the caller. These buses are not necessarily in sync. During 1983-84, I was living in a house served by an AT&T Xbar (I'm not sure which version). My roommate had one of those cheapie phones that chirps when it's supposed to ring. Callers to our number would hear a high-pitched chirping (at low volume) during the ringback. When the phone was disconnected, no chirping was heard during the ringback. On a related note, (crossing to the "Extra Drops" thread), a previous tenant had had three phone lines. After we took occupancy, our line was on one drop, someone else's line was active on our second drop, and the third drop had battery but no dial tone. We (kindly) had Bell disconnect the second drop from the house. The third drop would return no dial tone when a phone was connected, but a number could be pulsed down the line, and the dialed number (at least within our switch) would then ring. We couldn't hear ringback (or my roommate's cheapie phone), and when the other phone was answered, no talk path was cut through. At least in that house, we didn't need a ring-back number to test our phones. Mike King * Software Sourcerer * Fairchild Space * +1 301.428.5384 mking@fsd.com or 73710.1430@compuserve.com * (usual disclaimers) ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #583 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa29711; 17 Aug 93 21:33 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA15985 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 19:07:45 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA10617 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 19:07:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 19:07:03 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308180007.AA10617@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #584 TELECOM Digest Tue, 17 Aug 93 19:07:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 584 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Review of "The Matrix" by Quarterman (Rob Slade, DECrypt Editor) TAP/IXO Paging Software (Mark Rudholm) Facts About NTID (as Requested by D. Niebuhr) (Curtis E. Reid) Caller ID Deluxe Passes in Florida (ronnie@media.mit.edu) Alphanumeric Paging Terminal Protocols (Allan Griefer) Digital 900MHz Phones For Local Modem Use? (Rob Pfile) Telephony Museums (was Re: Central Office Tours?) (Kyle Rhorer) Studies on Liberalization of Telecom (Meg Arnold) Re: Cellular Conversation Results in Arrest (J. Philip Miller) Re: Cellular Conversation Results in Arrest (Joe Bergstein) Re: Radio Station Acronyms (Dave O'Heare) Re: Radar and Acronyms (Cole Keirsey) Re: Radar and Acronyms (Radio Stations) (Mark A. Terribile) Re: Radar and Acronyms (Radio Stations) (Joseph M. Carey) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 17 Aug 93 11:26 -0600 From: Rob Slade, DECrypt Editor Subject: Review of "The Matrix" by Quarterman Digital Press PO Box 3027 One Burlington Woods Drive Burlington, MA 01803-9593 800-DIGITAL (800-344-4825) "The Matrix: Computer Networks and Conferencing Systems Worldwide", Quarterman, 1990, 1-55558-033-5 matrix@tic.com If Ed Krol's book is the "user's guide" to the Internet, Quarterman's work is the technical reference manual. Taking as its title William Gibson's term from "Neuromancer", "The Matrix" covers all aspects, not just of the TCP/IP Internet proper, but all of the component parts, major and minor, connected or not, which make up electronic communication and cooperative computing systems. It may be going a bit far to say this is the "reference" to the developing cyberspace. "Index" might be the more accurate term. When confronted with a technical problem, you likely won't find the ultimate answer here, even with 700 pages of text. You will, however, find an initial discussion of pretty well any internetworking entity, and either bibliography or contact information to take it further. The book is divided into two main parts. The first, labelled "Background", is a conceptual discussion of networks and networking. Specific protocols and bodies are covered here, but the details of actual working networks are left to part two. Chapter one is an introduction to the basic principles and components of networks, and a description and outline for the rest of part one. Chapter two covers "User Services" and the actual functions of networks and "Computer Mediated Communications" (CMC is an important acronym in the book), while chapter three explores the uses to which these features and functions are put. Chapter four and five deal with the various protocols and standards used in network communication. The technical protocols which fit easily within the ISO/OSI model are discussed first. "Meta" protocols, which deal with management types of issues are covered separately. "Administration", chapter six, seems rather odd until one realizes that it is laying out the way of examining and describing actual "real world" networks that is used in part two. It is difficult to say how important this is. On the one hand, the entries in part two are laid out in a clear and logical fashion. On the other, discussions of purpose, administration and funding are too often neglected in discussions of networking issues, and Quarterman's work puts a lot of this back into perspective. Chapter seven, "History and Future", is not exactly a "time line" of computer communications. Rather, there are interesting historical tidbits from the stories of the development of component pieces of "the net". This chapter is fascinating reading, although by no means exhaustive. (Canada gets no mention at all in the development of the X.25 protocol, although Quarterman does later redeem himself by admitting that Datapac was the world's first public data net.) (No wonder there is so much to hate about Datapac.) Of the future, well, with the advantage of coming in halfway into Quarterman's projection, perhaps it's best to say nothing. Chapter eight deals with the various bodies involved in producing and formalizing standards and protocols. This section is a tremendous resource in terms of the different groups involved in communications development on an on- going basis. Part two, as mentioned, details the actual "real world" networks. Chapter nine gives an overview and outline of the scope of the section, as well as dealing with the thorny issue of addressing schemes. Chapter ten deals with various "worldwide" networks (including, in an interesting departure from network snobbery, Fidonet) while chapter eleven covers the Internet proper. Chapters twelve through twenty describe the plethora of national and regional networks by continental and sub-continental areas. (And I do not appreciate the comment that Canada is "too small to develop [networks] itself.") Chapter twenty-one briefly discusses proprietary commercial systems such as the WELL, Compuserve and MCI Mail. It is interesting to note that, in the few years since publication, most of these systems now at least exchange mail with the Internet. There are two major appendices. The first is strictly reference material: a listing of public data networks. The second is a discussion of Computer mediated communication and the law. Once again, this is mostly U.S. law that is referenced, although European Community regulatory bodies are mentioned briefly. The last page of the book contains a questionnaire about the desire for an "electronic" version of the book. Such an ongoing project would be highly interesting. Unfortunately, it has not come to pass. What has developed is "Matrix News", a monthly publication devoted to the topic. It is available in print, or in ASCII or Postscript format electronically. The number of maps and geographic "graphs" has spun off a sister publication, "Matrix Maps Quarterly", which is available in print or Postscript format. Those interested can contact: Matrix Information and Directory Services, Inc. (MIDS) mids@tic.com +1-512-451-7602 fax: +1-512-450-1436 1106 Clayton Lane, Suite 500W Austin, TX 78723 U.S.A. As stated previously, this book does not contain technical details. Although it discussed the RS-232 standard and TCP/IP protocol, it will not assist you to configure a UUCP machine or program UDP packets. The intelligent reader, even without familiarity with computer concepts, should be able to comprehend the material included in the book. Novice readers, however, may find the text to be larded with references to protocols, standards groups and other TLAs (Three Letter Acronyms). It would be a pity if they allowed themselves to be scared off: Quarterman is a source that would allow the newcomer to start to make sense of the alphabet soup. "The Matrix" is not a "how to" book for connecting to the Internet, although it certainly contains all the contacts necessary for doing so. Neither is it a treatise on the use of network communications and functions, although some of the discussions of network usage are considered and thoughtful. The contents, although clearly explained, are perhaps too formidable to be an "introduction" for the novice network user. I referred to it as an index at the beginning of this review. Perhaps it is primarily a signpost, pointing the way to the myriad paths of networking and internetworking. The scope of "The Matrix" extends too far to examine each topic in detail. At each point, however, bibliographic references or organizational contacts are available for further exploration. No matter where you want to go, you can "get there from here." For those who merely wish to connect to Usenet and get alt.feethy. peetchers, this book will not be necessary. For those wanting to explore the global possibilities of computer networking, this book is a must. copyright Robert M. Slade, 1993 BKMATRIX.RVW 930817 Vancouver ROBERTS@decus.ca Institute for Robert_Slade@sfu.ca Research into rslade@cue.bc.ca User p1@CyberStore.ca Security Canada V7K 2G6 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 15:24:10 PDT From: rudholm@aimla.com (Mark Rudholm) Subject: TAP/IXO Paging Software I am in need of software that will do TAP/IXO alphanumeric paging for any of the following platforms: MS-DOS, MS-Windows, Mac, or SunOS. I checked the telecom archives (lcs.mit.edu) and found only a hypercard stack from Brad Hicks which I dowloaded and decoded properly but couldn't get to work. Some time ago someone at "boy.com" (I think) posted an announcement that they would send a Windows application for TAP paging to anyone who asked. Unfortunately, I lost the address. Any pointers (or software) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Mark D. Rudholm rudholm@aimla.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 17:39:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Curtis E. Reid Subject: Facts About NTID (as Requested by D. Niebuhr) > I would like to ask Curtis to explain the mission of the NTID to the > readership so that they can learn about this very valuable school. > For those not familiar with the NTID, the name is National Technical > Institute for the Deaf. Thanks for the plug. It's not often we hear about this. As you requested, I am copying an excerpt from one of our NTID publications that we use to inform people about it. Any typos are mine. Enjoy! Curtis "The National Technical Institute for the Deaf (NTID), one of RIT's eight colleges, provides deaf students with technological training that leads to meaningful employment in business, industry, government, and education. Created in 1965 by Congress and funded primarily by the U.S. Department of Education, NTID represents the world's first effort to educate large numbers of deaf students within a college campus planned principally for hearing students. NTID's location benefits both deaf and hearing students' academic, personal, social, and communication development. "Nearly 1,100 deaf students from across the United States as well as from several U.S. territories and other countries study and reside at RIT. "NTID provides RIT's deaf students with technical and professional training in 35 programs offered through its three schools: School of Business Careers, School of Science and Engineering Careers, and School of Visual Communications. An NTID education prepares students for technical careers in areas such as accounting, applied art and computer graphics, applied computer technology, engineering technology, medical laboratory technology, medical record technology, and photo/media technologies. "Traditionally, 95 percent of NTID graduates find employment in their fields of study. "NTID also provides extensive support services for deaf students studying in RIT's other seven colleges. "For hearing students, NTID also provides an associate degree in educational interpreting." Curtis E. Reid CER2520@ritvax.isc.rit.edu Rochester Institute of Technology/NTID REID@DECUS.org (DECUS) 52 Lomb Memorial Drive 716.475.6089 TDD/TT 475.6895 Voice Rochester, NY 14623-5604 U.S.A. 716.475.6500 Fax (Business Use Only) ------------------------------ From: ronnie@media.mit.edu Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 16:01:02 -0400 Subject: Caller ID Deluxe Passes in Florida Just got off the phone with the public relations person at the Florida PSC, and she told me that the hearing just ended and it passed. She was a non-technical person and she didn't even know what Caller ID was, but I assume that she is right about its passing. Supposedly, we should be getting the name delivery with CLID sometime within the next week. Ron (ronnie@media.mit.edu) ------------------------------ From: Allan Griefer Subject: Alphanumeric Paging Terminal Protocols Date: 17 Aug 1993 02:40:23 GMT Organization: IBM Almaden Research Center I'm looking for a copy of the protocols used on serial lines between the user's computer and the paging company. I've heard of at least two protocols; PET from Motorola and TAP from Telocator. Does anyone have copies that they can post or send to me? Thanks, Opinions are strictly my own, Allan D. Griefer, IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA VNET/BITNET: GRIEFER at ALMADEN Fax: (408)927-4004 Internet: griefer@almaden.ibm.com ------------------------------ From: pfile@dingo.cs.wisc.edu (Rob Pfile) Subject: Digital 900MHz Phones For Local Modem Use? Organization: UW-Madison Computer Sciences Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 21:52:27 GMT I have been thinking about getting a cellular modem for my powerbook, but I fear this is probably just too expensive for what I would use it for. An idea i had the other day was to try using one of these newfangled 900MHz phones so I can roam around the house and in the immediate area with my 'book and still be able to dial out. Does the 'spread-spectrum'/digital nature of the latest breed of these portable phones preclude the use of a plain modem over the connection? I assume the first breed of analog 900MHz phones would work just fine, but i'd like the range and security of the digital flavor. Thanks for any help. rob pfile pfile@cs.wisc.edu ------------------------------ From: Rhorer@medics.jsc.nasa.gov (Kyle Rhorer) Subject: Telephony Museums (was Re: Central Office Tours?) Date: 17 Aug 1993 19:51:39 GMT Organization: KRUG Life Sciences Several people have mentioned museums with telephone equipment on display. I am interested in compiling a "directory" of sorts to such museums around the US. If anyone knowing the whereabouts/cost/hours/ etc of such places would e-mail the info to me, I will tabulate it and post the directory once compiled. If someone has already compiled a directory such as this, please let me know where I can find it (I'm a relative newbie to the Internet). Kyle Rhorer rhorer@medics.jsc.nasa.gov ------------------------------ From: meg_arnold@qm.sri.com (Meg Arnold) Subject: Studies on Liberalization of Telecom Date: 17 Aug 1993 17:40:43 GMT Organization: SRI International Hi. This is a request which I hope will inundate me with information. I am looking for the titles and publishers (as well as contact info and publication date if possible) of reports and studies of the effects of the liberalization of telecommunications. Yes, I know there are hundreds of these things. My primary area of focus is the U.S. and the aftermath of the AT&T divestiture, but I have a secondary interest in other regions of the world that have experience their own forms of liberalization, such as Autralia, New Zealand, UK, elsewhere in Europe. Both pro and con opinions are sought. All I need are titles and publishers; I'll do the rest of the gruntwork myself. Thanks for all your help! E-mail to me, and I'll summarize, rather than inundating PAT. Meg Arnold SRI International 333 Ravenswood Avenue Menlo Park, CA 94025 415-859-3764 meg_arnold@qm.sri.com ------------------------------ From: phil@wubios.wustl.edu (J. Philip Miller) Subject: Re: Cellular Conversation Results in Arrest Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 09:07:18 -0500 (CDT) > That's not what the reports I saw said. The {Chicago Tribune} and the > {Detroit Free Press} both said that it was the call detail (when and > where the calls were made to) rather than the contents that led to the > suspects. This what the first reports that I saw seemed to say. A TV report yesterday (NBC) seemed to say that they got caught because they made calls from the cellular phone to sex-phone lines. Unless they gave their names or their own credit card numbers I do not see how this was possible. If police talked to the phone sex ladies and got information about the conversation, then it does not seem to be unlawful search since the sex ladies can certainly tell anything that they heard on the phone. You hardly expect them to be confidential, do you? J. Philip Miller, Professor, Division of Biostatistics, Box 8067 Washington University Medical School, St. Louis MO 63110 phil@wubios.WUstl.edu - (314) 362-3617 [362-2693(FAX)] ------------------------------ From: Joe.Bergstein@p501.f544.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Joe Bergstein) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 21:26:29 -0500 Subject: Re: Cellular Conversation Results in Arrest Reply to message in "COMP.DCOM.TELECOM" > Two teenagers have been arrested and charged with the murder of > Michael Jordan's father. The news reports say that the content > of conversations made from Mr. Jordan's cellular phone led to the > arrest. > Have similar cases not been thrown out when it was revealed that > cellular phones were monitored? News reports I've seen and heard here in Washington D.C. indicate that it was _not_ call monitoring, but billing records which led to the arrests. I believe the police used the call records to track down the called parties, from whom they must have discovered the names of the "perps" (perpatrators). ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 11:05:16 -0400 From: doheare@jetform.com (Dave O'Heare) Subject: Radio Station Acronyms In Canada, there have been a few. CFRB stood for "Canada's First Radio -- Batteryless", to indicate the modern (!) technology being used. In Ottawa, CKPM (an easy-listening station) changed their image and playlist to a top-40 station, and changed their call sign to CFGO. That supposedly stood for "CF Greater Ottawa". Coincidentally, a gay-rights organization started to make nthe news about then, named Gays Ottawa -- GO for short. The radio station now refers to itself as "Energy 1200". All the radio stations that run contests and the like are on the same choke exchange -- 750 XXXX. Curiously, most winners of contests seems to be from just outside the greater Ottawa city limits. Dave O'Heare doheare@jetform.com ------------------------------ From: cole@advtech.uswest.com ( Cole Keirsey) Subject: Re: Radar and Acronyms Organization: U S WEST Advanced Technologies Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 18:52:42 GMT In article padgett@tccslr.dnet.mmc.com (A. Padgett Peterson) writes: > otto@vaxb.acs.unt.edu wrote: >>> FUBAR > Actually this is a "dual use" acronym probably invented by the > military containing a local meaning (among equals) and an "official" > meaning Then there are acronyms that have dual meanings quite by accident. Two of my favorites are: RCA -- "Radio Corporation of America" or "Rodeo Cowboys' Association" and ATM -- "Automatic Teller Machine" or "Asynchronous Transfer Mode" Any additions? C. C. Keirsey cole@maverick.uswest.com ------------------------------ From: mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us Subject: Re: Radar and Acronyms (Radio Stations) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 20:10:11 GMT In article , Ron Bean writes: > Eric_N._Florack.cru-mc@xerox.com writes: >> In your acronyms, nobody has mentioned that there were several radio >> stations that used their callsigns for such. This is kinda fun, so ... > Another I forgot above was WHA = Wisconsin: Heartland of America. WFAS, owned by Frank A. Sys and their FM sister, WWYD `Wiiiiide Stereo.' (This man's opinions are his own.) From mole-end Mark Terribile mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us, Somewhere in Matawan, NJ ------------------------------ From: careyj@spot.Colorado.EDU (CAREY JOSEPH M) Subject: Re: Radar and Acronyms (Radio Stations) Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 17:21:30 GMT Ron Bean writes: > Eric_N._Florack.cru-mc@xerox.com writes: >> In your acronyms, nobody has mentioned that there were several radio >> stations that used their callsigns for such. This is kinda fun, so ... > WORT = World's Oldest Radio Transmitter A couple of others in Chicago our moderator should know: WLS - "World's Largest Store." Used to be owned by Sears-Roebuck WGN - "World's Greatest Newspaper." Owned by the Chicago Tribune And in Detroit there is: WJBK - "Jesus Be Kind." Originally run by a religious organization. A friend of mine, who works at WPWR in Chicago said there were some minority organizations who _MISTAKENLY_ thought that stood for "White Power." He says it just stands for POWER (W is required). Joe Carey joe@lobos.colorado.edu [Moderator's Note: In the early days of radio, when callsigns were not in short supply (at least where workable combinations for abbreviations were concerned), nearly all the call letters meant *something*. As often as not it was the owner's name, and if his name started with W or K, so much the better for him. And don't forget the international shortwave giants: WINB in Red Lion, PA is the World International Broadcasters as one example. Religious station HCJB in Quito, Equador (H is assigned in Equador) is another: Heralding Christ Jesus' Blessings. And you have my blessings for this time around. See ya later! PAT] ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #584 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa00119; 17 Aug 93 22:15 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA17006 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 20:02:52 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA14414 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 20:02:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 20:02:21 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308180102.AA14414@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #585 TELECOM Digest Tue, 17 Aug 93 20:02:15 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 585 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Is This Legal? (Brian Warner) Re: Is This Legal? (Andy Sherman) Re: Hotel Rip-Off - Is This a Record? (Bob Frankston) Re: AT&T Language Line Choices (Peter M. Weiss) Re: AT&T Language Line Choices (William M. Eldridge) Re: AT&T Language Line Choices (Paul Colley) Re: Video Conference Standards (Sandy Kyrish) Re: Video Conference Standards (Curtis Sanford) Re: FCC Equal Access Order (R. Kevin Oberman) Readback of Phone Number in 212-319 (Phydeaux) Re: AT&T Buys McCaw (Cellular One) (Gary Morris) Re: 10xxx NOT Allowed on 1-800 (Bill Hofmann) Re: Fidonet Specs Wanted (David Dodell) Re: AT&T Spending $5(m) on Video Games (Reid R. Buyaky) Re: Flooding in the Midwest (Cliff Sharp) Re: Phones Swamped When Elvis Died (Tad Cook) Re: Wait! Let me Get a Pen! (Carl Moore) ---------------------- TELECOM Digest is an e-journal devoted mostly -- but not exclusively -- to discussions on voice telephony. The Digest is a not-for-profit public service published frequently by Patrick Townson Associates. PTA markets a no-surcharge telephone calling card and a no monthly fee 800 service. In addition, we are resellers of AT&T's Software Defined Network. For a detailed discussion of our services, write and ask for the file 'products'. The Digest is delivered at no charge by email to qualified subscribers on any electronic mail service connected to the Internet. To join the mail- ing list, write and tell us how you qualify: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu. All article submissions MUST be sent to our email address: telecom@eecs. nwu.edu -- NOT as replies to comp.dcom.telecom. Back issues and numerous other telephone-related files of interest are available from the Telecom Archives, using anonymous ftp lcs.mit.edu. Login anonymous, then 'cd telecom-archives'. At the present time, the Digest is also ported to Usenet at the request of many readers there, where it is known as 'comp.dcom.telecom'. Use of the Digest does not require the use of our products and services. The two are separate. All articles are the responsibility of the individual authors. Organi- zations listed, if any, are for identification purposes only. The Digest is compilation-copyrighted, 1993. **DO NOT** cross-post articles between the Digest and other Usenet or alt newsgroups. Do not compile mailing lists from the net-addresses appearing herein. Send tithes and love offerings to PO Box 1570, Chicago, IL 60690. :) Phone: 312-465-2700. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: warner@alantec.com (Brian Warner) Subject: Re: Is This Legal? Date: 17 Aug 93 17:34:25 GMT padwad@psd.gs.com (Danny Padwa) writes: > Is Centrex the only service that can provide this? ... > They also have an interesting system for billing calls ... any call > that is chargeable (not "local" based upon the phone's calling plan) > requires the input of your PIN. This allows making long-distance > calls from other people's rooms, and also (they say) helps avoid > roommate squabbles over phone charges, since everyone gets their own > bill. It also opens a huge avenue for fraud (figure ~6.5k students, 5 > digit PIN ... shouldn't take too many guesses), but now that the > University runs the phones, phone fraud is a University offense, and > grounds to be "required to withdraw". > I know that Columbia has a similar policy of billing a person, rather > than a phone, for LD calls. Is this common? We have a similar system at Stanford, which they installed about two years ago. All the student numbers are 415-497-xxxx, most offices are 723-xxxx or 725-xxxx, and on campus you can just use five digits to get to another phone on campus. It makes for some interesting misdials, because there are some local off-campus numbers (pizza joints, for one) that have exchanges which start with that 7-xx prefix. Our PINs are seven digits long, but we've had a problem with fraud too; same threat of disciplinary action as well. About six months after the system was put in place, there were a couple of law students saying they had plans to sue the university because they couldn't get access to other long-distance carriers. I'm not sure how this ended up. Brian Warner warner@leland.stanford.edu warner@alantec.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 14:35:30 EDT From: andys@internet.sbi.com (Andy Sherman) Subject: Re: Is This Legal? In article 5@eecs.nwu.edu, atri@eecs.umich.edu (Atri Indiresan) writes: > Do the FCC regulations say anything specific about 10XXX access, or, > is there legal opinion/agreement around that implies that 0+ access is > good enough? 0+ access is not equal to 10XXX, but is it equal enough > to satisfy the FCC? Since a University is considered an aggregator like a hotel, then 0+ access is probably all that is required. By the way, 10XXX access may be the method of choice for granting 0+ access. 10XXX+0+ is allowed. 10XXX+1+ is not. If you think about it, this makes perfect sense. Nobody expects a hotel to provide 10XXX + 1 + access, just 10XXX + 0 + access. The FCC's unblocking order probably just classifies a dormitory as a big hotel. Andy Sherman Salomon Inc - Unix Systems Support - Rutherford, NJ (201) 896-7018 - andys@sbi.com or asherman@sbi.com ------------------------------ From: Bob_Frankston@frankston.com Subject: Re: Hotel Rip-Off - Is This a Record? Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 09:37 -0400 It would be helpful to tell when various hotel rip-off's have occurred since the situation is changing. I rarely encounter 800 number surcharges these days and other surcharges seem to be going away. This is the case even when the phone itself is posted with a surcharge price. Apparently the outrage has had its affect. I also maintain an 800 number for both my house and my home server as a way of greatly simplifying my use of hotel phones and avoiding surcharges for operator-assisted calls (which typically does include dialed credit card calls). ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 09:56:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter M. Weiss Subject: Re: AT&T Language Line Choices Organization: Penn State University In article , Will Martin says: > would really like AT&T to PROVE that they can provide access to *any* > of their advertised listed languages in a short timeframe, suitable > for emergency use. (...) I would be careful of using a service for emergency use that was NOT designed for same. I wonder if AT&T is marketing it for that kind? (I doubt it.) Pete ------------------------------ From: bill@COGNET.UCLA.EDU (William M. Eldridge) Subject: Re: AT&T Language Line Choices Date: 17 Aug 1993 10:28:27 -0700 Organization: UCLA Cognitive Science Research Program > Toyshanese Turkish Turkmen Twi Ukranian Urdu Vietnamese Wolof > Wuxinese Yiddish Yoruba ... > Hmmmm ... methinks they artificially expand this list by including > many dialects or slight variants on the basic, and I bet the same > translator(s) handle them all -- note all the national variations of > Arabic, for example. I hope you-all appreciate this; my eyes are now > killing me ... :-) Trying to read this tiny print and my screen at the > same time is next to impossible. I thought "Assyrian" and "Chaldean" > were dead languages known only by a few scholars these days -- are > there really people living around the Euphrates today speaking the > same language that was spoken in Ur? Talk about an oral history ...! :-) I recall our military strategy three years ago as "bombing them back to the stone age", and like with everything, they were apparently only halfway successful -- but then four or five thousand years isn't too bad, especially when some believe Earth started 5732 years ago. On the other hand, differentiating Morroccan from Arabic is valid (though one person could do both), and Maghrebi is completely unrelated to Arabic from what I understand. Bill Eldridge bill@cognet.ucla.edu 310-206-3960 (3987 fax) ------------------------------ From: colley@qucis.queensu.ca (Paul Colley) Subject: Re: AT&T Language Line Choices Organization: Computing & Information Science, Queen's University at Kingston Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 17:29:16 GMT In article Will Martin writes: > I have before me a leaflet dated 1991 advertising the AT&T Language > Line, with a page of tiny print listing all the languages offered at > that time. What!? English isn't on the list? (but "Pidgin-English" is!) French is on the list, hmmmm. Good thing AT&T isn't a Canadian company, that sort of language-prejudice (implying French is a foreign language, but English isn't) would be a public-relations disaster here. Paul Colley University: colley@qucis.queensu.ca Home: pacolley@ember.uucp watmath!ember!pacolley +1 613 545 3807 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 17:25 GMT From: Sandy Kyrish <0003209613@mcimail.com> Subject: Re: Video Conference Standards There appears to be some confusion, partially propagated by vendors I fear, about the "inferiority" of the CCITT videoconference standard. The following is excerpted from a messge I sent directly to John Humm. A couple of things you should understand about the standards. (Known as H.261, for the video coding and encoding; H.320 is the "umbrella" standard governing video plus audio plus control.) H.261 is a very robust standard at its fullest implementation, which is something called CIF (Common Intermediate Format -- a mix between US and European stds), specifying a frame rate of 30 fps and a resolution of 288 x 352 pixels, and lots of sophisticated signal processing stuff to improve overall picture quality. Despite what vendors will tell you, no proprietary algorithm is substantially better than H.261 implemented in its fullest glory, and is certainly not worth giving up interconnect- ivity. That said, the second thing to know is that for a codec to be certified as "CCITT compatible", it only has to conform to the lowest rungs of the H.261 standard ... a format called QCIF, for quarter CIF. It is literally half the horizontal and half the vertical pixels (i.e. 144 x 176), or a quarter of the original resolution. It also allows a slower frame rate, which reduces the smoothness and increases the jerky feeling. It is true that at the QCIF implementation of H.261, a vendor's proprietary algorithm may well look better, because it is ramping up the resolution and frame rate, then comparing it to the QCIF and saying, "See? The standard looks terrible." Some companies, like GPT Video Systems in Atlanta, are concentrating on producing codecs that hew to the top end of the CCITT standard. In a "shoot-out" a while back at a systems integrator's place, the top end of the CCITT standard was deemed a better picture than any vendor's proprietary algorithm. Don't fall for vendor hype about the CCITT standard! Each is obviously banking in the short term on hanging on to a customer base. They are all good companies but are not doing the world a favor by pooh-poohing the H.261 standard. ------------------------------ From: sanford@ascend.com (Curtis Sanford) Subject: Re: Video Conference Standards Date: 17 Aug 93 18:01:51 GMT Organization: Ascend Communications, Alameda CA It has been observed that a considerable increase in audio quality, as well as picture quality, may be realized by going from 2*56kbps to 3*56kbps (168kbps) using Picturetel's SG3 algorithim. This does require a (low-end) inverse multiplexer. ------------------------------ From: oberman@ptavv.llnl.gov Subject: Re: FCC Equal Access Order Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 14:59:30 GMT Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory In Article mho@ficus.CS.UCLA.EDU (Mike Ho) writes: > *IF* I am reading this correctly, this order appears to prohibit the > practice of charging 75 cents to reach an "800" number from inside a > hotel, at least to the extent that the "800" number is used to reach a > telephone company. I don't see anything out of context, but I also don't see anything supporting your opinion that the $.75 is illegal. If the hotel/aggregator charges for long distance access through their default carrier, they can charge it for access to any carrier whether by 800 or 10XXX (or even 950). The only way to be sure if it's legal is to check on the charges for calls through the default carrier. If there is a flat fee on long distance calls, that same fee may be charged for access to another carrier. (This does not mean that there are not other charges tied to the use of the default carrier.) The FCC requires aggregators to make the fees charged for phone use available. (It hardly ever is, though.) If you can get it, it may be the only way to tell if there is a charge for calls through the default carrier as the call detail at checkout will merely show a three minute call for $5.30 or some such. How much of the $5.30 is the access charge? Who knows? R. Kevin Oberman Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Internet: koberman@llnl.gov (510) 422-6955 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 08:35:11 PDT From: reb@ingres.com (Phydeaux) Subject: Readback of Phone Number in 212-319 For those of you in NYtel land, pressing 958 will get you a readback of your own telephone number in the 212-319 exchange. I guess it may work for others as well. Happy dialing, reb ------------------------------ From: garym@alsys.com (Gary Morris @ignite) Subject: Re: AT&T Buys McCaw (Cellular One) Organization: Alsys Group, San Diego, CA, USA Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 16:51:08 GMT In bdboyle@erenj.com (Bryan D. Boyle) writes: > So, AT&T, rather than fighting, bought McCaw Communications today for > $12 billion. Now, this is interesting news. Also in the news yesterday was an interesting item about McCaw and PacTel getting approval to combine their cellular systems in a joint venture. PacTel Mobile Services will merge with the McCaw operation in the Bay Area, PacTel will buy McCaw's systems in the Wichita and Topeka, and also merge in their 34% ownership of a Dallas cellular system. This means it's really PacTel and AT&T that are in this joint venture. Gary Morris Internet: garym@alsys.com TeleUSE/Ada Development UUCP: uunet!alsys.com!garym Alsys Inc. (TeleSoft) Phone: +1 619-457-2700 x128 San Diego, CA, USA Fax: +1 619-452-1334 ------------------------------ From: wdh@netcom.com (Bill Hofmann) Subject: Re: 10xxx NOT Allowed on 1-800 Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 17:03:20 GMT Just a minor addendum: you can't do 10xxx on 900 numbers either. Bill Hofmann ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Fidonet Specs Wanted From: david@stat.com (David Dodell) Reply-To: david@stat.com (David Dodell) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 08:56:17 MST Organization: Stat Gateway Service, WB7TPY root@cpp.PHA.PA.US (Rich Bauer) writes: > Where can I obtain complete technical descriptions (and/or code) for > writing applications which interface with the FIDONET network ? The document you want is called FSC-001 ... this explains the basic interface of exchanging email via Fidonet. I am sure there are additional documents for echomail (Fidonet's equivalent for newsgroups). I don't know who is storing them these days, but you might try sending email to: Rick.Moore@f333.n115.z1.fidonet.org Or better yet, try ftp to ftp.ieee.org or kumr.lns.com ... they have alot of Fidonet docs online. David Internet: david@stat.com FAX: +1 (602) 451-6135 Bitnet: ATW1H@ASUACAD FidoNet=> 1:114/15 Amateur Packet ax25: wb7tpy@wb7tpy.az.usa.na ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 10:27:24 EDT From: mr!dev2!rbuyaky@uu3.psi.com (Reid R. Buyaky) Subject: Re: AT&T Spending $5(m) on Video Games oracle@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Schroeder) wrote: > Actually, Sierra Inc. has a gaming BBS with interactive-online > gaming. They've been running it for over two years, if I remember the > ads correctly, and apparently are doing well. The BBS, from what I > understand is about 80% gaming and 20% customer service -- selling > games over the bbs and technical support type things I apologize for the late response (I've been on vacation). Sierra Online runs two electronic services for their customers. One is a simple multiline BBS for customer service, hints, and sales activities. Access to this system is free (except for the telco charges) to anyone with a modem. Their commercial service is The Sierra Network. It is, in fact, the service into which AT&T has invested. When The Sierra Network was being developed, I was a beta tester for Sierra, and had the opportunity to use the earliest incarnation of the service. It was then called "Constant Companion" and was Ken Williams' idea for providing a way for "home bound" individuals to socialize with others at any time of the day or night. He envisioned elderly or physically challenged individuals congregating online for bridge, chess, checkers, and other games requiring multiple players. I've not used the service since the testing days, but know people who are addicted to some of the online adventure games. I seem to also recall that Prodigy is involved in the partnership with Sierra and AT&T. Reid R. Buyaky (Software Systems Engineer) Micro Resources, Inc. -- rbuyaky@mr.com Heartland Multiline BBS - 614-846-7669 MajorNet - Sysop@HRT ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Flooding in the Midwest Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 13:01:58 CDT From: Cliff Sharp > [Moderator's Note: The American Red Cross is still making appeals for > assistance with the midwest flooding. They need cash. PAT] Don't forget the Salvation Army is out there in the area too, helping to feed people and organize the distribution of badly-needed goods. They, too, can use cash, and if asked will earmark it for flood relief. Cliff Sharp clifto@indep1.chi.il.us OR clifto@indep1.uucp WA9PDM Use whichever one works ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Phones Swamped When Elvis Died Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 11:33:34 PDT From: tad@ssc.com (Tad Cook) Carl Moore writes: > Among the special TV and radio items on yesterdany (Aug. 15) about > Elvis Presley was a 1977 broadcast from Memphis announcing his death; > it included a public appeal not to make unnecessary phone calls, > because of the Memphis area being swamped with calls as a result of > Elvis' death (Aug. 16, 1977). > I have not heard of any such thing happening when John Lennon was shot > and killed very late Dec. 8, 1980 in New York. I was in the University District in Seattle when the news came out that Monday night. I noticed some dialtone delay on two lines I had from the Lakeview CO, which was a combination 1AESS and crossbar. I had one line from each part of the switch, and it seems like the delay was worse on the older crossbar switch. At the time I supposed that the younger population of the U District was more likely to tie up the network in response to the news than would other areas of town. I recall trying to call someone in the adjacent Campus CO to the south and getting All Trunks Busy. But the blockage is much worse and more widespread here when we get an ocasional big snow. I remember hearing an anecdote years ago from a Contel employee who had heard a story from someone who was in a step office when Bobby Kennedy was shot. Allegedly the whole office "seized up", as linefinders tried to deliver dialtone to too many lines all at once. > I do know that fans gathered outside the Dakota, where Lennon > lived, but it seems to me that he was more reclusive than Elvis. I don't think so. I think Elvis spent his last days holed up in Graceland. Friends in New York City told me that Lennon was quite accessable. In fact, Lennon signed an autograph and chatted with his killer just hours before he was shot. tad@ssc.com (if it bounces, use 3288544@mcimail.com) Tad Cook Packet Amateur Radio: Home Phone: Seattle, WA KT7H @ N7DUO.WA.USA.NA 206-527-4089 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 9:34:56 EDT From: Carl Moore Subject: Re: Wait! Let me Get a Pen! I take it something strange is going on if a number gets changed to the same one? Well, that could just be a matter of entering the wrong number in the intercept message for the old number. Several years ago, someone changed his number from a New Castle (Del.) exchange to a Newark number, with that Newark number being the same as mine except for two transposed digits. Then the phone company mistakenly entered my number in the intercept message for that old New Castle number. So I got some calls from people who dialed correctly but who had been given the wrong number by the intercept. [Moderator's Note: Sometime around 1974-75 when an office here was cut to ESS (Chicago-Beverly on the far southwest side) some fool got the exchanges 922 and 939 mixed up in whatever tables they use. I had the office number WEbster-9-4600 in those days; Sears, Roebuck Credit Card billing office had WABash-2-4600. I had two lines in rotary hunt; Sears had a big five position cord board which rocked around the clock with people crabbing about their credit card bills, etc. 922 and 939 are both in the same CO downtown -- Wabash -- and for two days running I was flooded with wrong numbers; like a call every five minutes or so and Sears probably never even missed them at all. Repair service got it all untangled after a couple days of calls from me. PAT] ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #585 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa15894; 18 Aug 93 13:49 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA19919 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 21:45:36 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA11086 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 21:44:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 21:44:57 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308180244.AA11086@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #586 TELECOM Digest Tue, 17 Aug 93 21:45:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 586 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Looking For PC Voicemail Card (Frank Keeney) Re: Another Look at Alex Bell (Martin McCormick) Re: Leftover Drops (Arthur Rubin) Re: New Jersey Pulls the Plug on Computer-Dialed Calls (Dave Levenson) Re: Inter-LATA Caller*ID Arrives in NJ (Dave Levenson) Re: UUNet 900 Seems to be a Bad Idea (Louis A. Mamakos) Re: Wiring/Schematics/Info on Merlin? (Dave Ptasnik) Re: Radar and Acronyms (Fritz Whittington) Re: AT&T Truvoice Demo (Mark Rudholm) Foreign Exchange Service (Jody Kravitz) First National Bank Story Available Using FTP (Alex Griffiths) Funny Newspaper Headlines (Bruce Sullivan) Ending Sentences With Propositions (John Shaver) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: frank@calcom.socal.com (Frank Keeney) Reply-To: frank@calcom.socal.com Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 14:29:16 -0800 Subject: Re: Looking For PC Voicemail Card On Aug 15 21:42, Jeffrey J. Radice wrote: > I'm attempting to set up a friend's business for voicemail using his > computer, so he doesn't have the overhead of paying a service for the > same. I am not entirely familiar with the hardware, and software > required to do such a feat through a PC. I have a Voicemail system on my home PC from Eden Technology. It seems to work quite well. It will support up to 999 mailboxes which includes Fax-Back built in. It also supports: Notifying pagers after receiving a message. Call transfers on a PBX. Message forwarding to any preselected number. Complete remote control of any voice mailbox. Will share a phone line with a fax machine. All the mailboxes are password protected and uses a "tree" configuration using Windows 3.1 (it does not run in DOS.) You can make the system very easy or complex depending on what you want. You can setup almost any type of configuration. I run the system on a 486DLC with 8 meg. ram. Eden Technology says it will work with a system as small as a 286 with 2 meg. ram. It also has a built in fax board and comes with Winfax. The software can import any Windows document for "laser quality" faxes on the fax-back option. > Could someone direct me to sources for such items, a FAQ, or > the equivalent. All, and any, help is appreciated. I'm not sure of the price. I have mine on a semi-permanent loan from the person who sells it. I set it up and administer it and he uses it for demos. If you would like to call it here it is: (818) 791-0578 Voice mail and Fax Back You need to press "1" after the system says: "Press 1 to enter the voice mail system". Then press the extension number or listen to the directory. Here are some voice mailboxes that you can call: 402 Frank Keeney (me) 200 JT&T Manufacturing (they sell the system.) 201 Sample fax-back (use your fax machine to try it.) No flames please. I do not make any money from the sales of this product. This is for your information only. Frank Keeney E-mail frank@calcom.socal.com 115 W. California Blvd., #411 Fidonet 1:102/645 Pasadena, CA 91105-1509 USA UUCP hatch!calcom!frank FAX +1 818 791-0578 Voice Mail +1 818-791-0578 x402 ------------------------------ From: martin@datacomm.ucc.okstate.edu (Martin McCormick) Subject: Re: Another Look at Alex Bell Organization: Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 21:36:54 GMT The arguments about deaf culture sure sound familiar. They are much like arguments that go on in the blind communities about such things as learning or not learning Braille, whether or not to use a white cane or dog guide, etc. They sound familiar because they usually spring from a tiny fragment of valid philosophy and are fanned in to full flame by lots of sociopolitical ranting which produces much more heat than light. All other things being equal, it would seem that the ultimate goal of any group of people with a common disability would be to do what ever was necessary to become a part of the rest of society. In the case of blind people, this involves things like learning typing in order to write messages that can be read by the rest of the public, white cane or dog-guide mobility so that one can safely get around on his or her own, and socialization skills which can only be gotten by interacting with the rest of the world. I have a very passing acquaintance with deaf people because I worked in a business that also employed several deaf men. They used sign language, written communication, and TDD's. Sometimes, when there was a complex interaction between a mixture of hearing and deaf people, there would be problems involving bits of the game plan being confused or jumbled simply due to communication lapses and nothing more. It would seem that a deaf person would want to learn both oral skills and sign language as well as written communication in order to have as many channels open as possible. If you wonder about communication between blind and deaf people, it can get rather interesting if the blind person does not know the manual alphabet which I don't. One day, I walked over to a part of the plant to do something that I normally did not do. One of the deaf workers thought I had just made a wrong turn and nicely, but forcefully guided me back to where I had started. I mouthed the name of the machine I was going to and started back there again. Again, I felt the same hand on my shoulder pulling me back to the starting position. Finally, one of the supervisors came over to see what the heck was going on and I explained. I also asked him to thank the other worker for helping. The whole thing was rather funny, but I really understood the other man's communication problem because, right then, it was a shared problem. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK O.S.U. Computer Center Data Communications Group ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Leftover Drops From: a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (Arthur Rubin) Date: 17 Aug 93 18:17:35 GMT Reply-To: a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (Arthur Rubin) In oppedahl@panix.com (Carl Oppedahl) writes: > Some states, among them Alabama, California, Delaware, Florida, > Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Maryland, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, > Ohio, Tennessee, and Virginia, have the policy that the demarc in > a multi-tenant building is at the point of entry for the building. True. > This means that if you are a tenant in a building in one of those states, > you are at the mercy of the landlord for the wire that goes from the > point of entry to your space. A jerk landlord will say that the only > way an extra line can be run from the POE to your space is for telco > to do it (at telco hourly rates, of course, since from telco's point > of view that is customer wire (inside wire). And the jerk landlord > will refuse to maintain that wire, leaving you to have to pay for > inside wire maintenance as your only way of being sure that wire will > be maintained without unexpected expense to you. That last is now false, and may have been false for a while. For quite a while, landlords have been responsible for maintaining, at the landlords' expense, wires inside a tenant's apartment. (It should be noted that this does give a landlord a reasonable excuse not to allow a tenant to install an additional (or any) phone lines.) A recent PUC requires building owners to maintain wiring between the demarc and the "apartment demarc", to use an intentionally incorrect phrase. Arthur L. Rubin: a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (work) Beckman Instruments/Brea 216-5888@mcimail.com 70707.453@compuserve.com arthur@pnet01.cts.com (personal) My opinions are my own, and do not represent those of my employer. ------------------------------ From: dave@westmark.com (Dave Levenson) Subject: Re: New Jersey Pulls the Plug on Computer-Dialed Calls Organization: Westmark, Inc. Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 22:26:32 GMT In article , gmerin@panix.com (Gary Merinstein) writes: > Thank God! I was sooo tired of getting those endless calls to sell me > a mausoleum plot ... You'll still get those calls. The law only applies to calls originated from telephones in New Jersey. The Garden State is not in any position to legislate calls placed to New Jersey telephones from out of state. But I agree -- it's a step in the right direction. Dave Levenson Internet: dave@westmark.com Westmark, Inc. UUCP: {uunet | rutgers | att}!westmark!dave Stirling, NJ, USA Voice: 908 647 0900 Fax: 908 647 6857 ------------------------------ From: dave@westmark.com (Dave Levenson) Subject: Re: Inter-LATA Caller*ID Arrives in NJ Organization: Westmark, Inc. Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 22:05:55 GMT In article , TERRY@spcvxa.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy) writes: > Of course, subscribers with large numbers of terminating calls can > already bypass the local operating company and get the calls delivered > via T1. The IXC normally passes all or part of the savings on to the > customer (as reduced rates for incoming 800 calls, etc.). It would be > interesting to see if anyone has been able to get Caller ID delivery > from an IXC via this method. Caller*ID (or as it is usually called in such cases, ANI) is now and long been available to subscribers who pay for it with bypass services. This includes AT&T's Megacom and MCI and Sprint's competitive offerings. Dave Levenson Internet: dave@westmark.com Westmark, Inc. UUCP: {uunet | rutgers | att}!westmark!dave Stirling, NJ, USA Voice: 908 647 0900 Fax: 908 647 6857 ------------------------------ From: louie@sayshell.umd.edu (Louis A. Mamakos) Subject: Re: UUNet 900 Seems to be a Bad Idea Date: 18 Aug 1993 00:24:08 GMT Organization: University of Maryland, College Park In article Bob_Frankston@frankston.com writes: > As part of my advocacy of 900 alternatives, the UUNet 900 service does > present an interesting challenge for those wanting to use a credit > card instead of a 900 number. Since the login is accomplished via a > UUCP connection script, it seems feasible for UUnet to accept a credit > card number as part of the connection sequence. Or even use the credit > card information as the "login" line. UUNet could dial out and verify > the credit card information before it allows the user to make a > transaction. By using a non800 number, the only risk incurred would be > the theft of service but UUNet would not be stuck with 800 or 900 > number charges if the credit card proved bogus. Sure all this is possible, but is it worth the effort? First, if the service isn't easy to use, then potential customers are not as likely to want to go to all the trouble to set their system up. Second, I'd certainly think twice before passing my credit card number to anyone. Third, actually accepting credit cards and doing the validation is probably a big effort too. Is there really sufficient return on this much investment in effort to make it worthwhile? Especially since the 900 service provider is doing all of the hard part for you. Louis Mamakos ------------------------------ From: davep@carson.u.washington.edu (Dave Ptasnik) Subject: Re: Wiring/Schematics/Info on Merlin? Date: 17 Aug 1993 22:09:21 GMT Organization: University of Washington Geez, its been a while, but I think that the innermost pair is tip and ring, the next pair out is signalling to the set, the next pair out is power to the set, and the outermost pair is a second tip and ring for simultaneous voice and data, or voice announce over busy. Seems to me that if you use local power, you can run a Merlin on two pair wire, instead the the excessive four pair that spec requires. All of the above is nothing more than the personal opinion of - Dave Ptasnik davep@u.washington.edu ------------------------------ From: fritz@mirage.hc.ti.com (Fritz Whittington) Subject: Re: Radar and Acronyms Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 18:34:38 CDT In comp.dcom.telecom padgett@tccslr.dnet.mmc.com (A. Padgett Peterson) writes: > The first multiple definition acronym that I am aware of was SNAFU > duning WWII or "Situation Normal, All F...ed Up" from this was > derived, FUBB (F...ed Up Beyond Belief), FUBAR (above), and, in the > Air Force the B-52 became BUFF (Big Ugly Fat F....er) in this case the > "public" translation was "Fellow". The most creative one I know of is > IHTFP which, often posted in public ares was "officially" translated > as "I Have Truely Found Paradise" and in private as "I Hate This > F...ing Place". > Since military technicians often became civilian technicians and > engineers, this tradition has carried forward in RTFM and RTFM-P > ("Read The F...ing Manual" and "Read The F...ing Manual - Please !") > though pronunciation is not easy. Of course in E-Mail, pronunciation > is unnecessary 8*). One military acronym (germane to wireless com if not telecom) I heard from my father, who was a CW operator with the Signal Corps in WWII. Lots of operators sat wearing headphones in front of typewriters, copying five-letter code groups from incoming messages. As a complication to the enemy code-breakers, when there was no legitimate traffic, the transmitting end often sent gibberish. To ensure this was really random gibberish, it was sent by machine. Experienced operators learned to recognize this mechanical "fist" and knew that it was 'busy traffic'. So rather than bother to copy it verbatim they would just repeatedly type BTSOM BTSOM BTSOM ... until they started getting "real" traffic again. (This mechanical fist was soon recognized as a potential aid to the enemy code-breakers, as they could also recognize the spoof traffic and therefore concentrate on breaking the real traffic. Since individual human 'fists' also could help in traffic analysis, the Army solved the problem by having all traffic sent by mechanical means. The receiving end, of course, wasn't so easy to mechanize ...) Oh, what does BTSOM stand for? Dunno, Beats The Sh*t Outta Me! Fritz Whittington Texas Instruments, P.O. Box 655474, MS 446 Dallas, TX 75265 Shipping address: 13510 North Central Expressway, MS 446 Dallas, TX 75243 fritz@ti.com Office: +1 214 995 0397 FAX: +1 214 995 6194 Since I am not an official TI spokesperson, these opinions contain no spokes. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 18:30:57 PDT From: rudholm@aimla.com (Mark Rudholm) Subject: Re: AT&T Truvoice Demo But wait a second, isn't demonstrating Truvoice over an obstensively non-truvoice line (they haven't installed it yet) like demonstrating HDTV via a regular NTSC broadcast? Makes you wonder if anyone in marketing anywhere understands simple logic. Mark D. Rudholm Philips Interactive Media rudholm@aimla.com 11050 Santa Monica Boulevard +1 213 930 1449 Los Angeles, CA 90025 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 18:02:06 PDT From: kravitz@foxtail.com (Jody Kravitz) Subject: Foreign Exchange Service I've been trying to find ways of reducing the phone costs for my wife's business and have been getting the runaround from Pacific Bell. My wife is a veterinarian and runs a mobile clinic from a specially converted motor home. Most of her clients are from an a nearby mountain community. That community has a #5ESS which is slaved off the #5ESS switch in our home town. Despite the proximity of the mountain town, incoming and outgoing calls are expensive. The cost of a daytime call to (or from) the town is $0.10 * (minutes+1). We had about $80.00 in calls to there last month and the volume is increasing. Oddly, calls to (or from) another (smaller) town in the same general direction, but further away, are free. Since she has no "office", we terminated her business phone line in our residence. That has worked well, but in order to appear more "permanent" to her customers in the neighboring town, we recently installed a "vanity" number (xxx-0500) in that town with remote call forwarding to our regular business number. This saves the caller the cost of calling our "old" business number, but in addition to the cost of the service, each forwarded call costs us $0.10 * (minutes+1). I recently discovered that one of my neighbors has "foreign exchange service" in their residence. This seemed like it might be a good idea, so I placed several calls to Pacific Bell's residence and business service offices. My first conversation was with a residence service rep who seemed informed and helpful. My second call was to a business rep who seemed to want to keep me uninformed. She left me so angry I felt I was talking to Ernestine the operator in a Lily Tomlim skit. I have several unanswered questions: Neither rep could explain to me how "engineering" computed the mileage numbers for the "foreign exchange service" rates I was quoted. One of the numbers was called "suburban mileage" and the other was something like "distance between rate centers". The COs are 15+ air miles apart, and my home is 19 air miles from the foreign CO. I was quoted three "quarter-mile units of suburban mileage and 37 "quarter-mile units between rate centers". Can anyone define the true meanings of these terms for me ? The business service rep said the location of the rate centers was "proprietary". Can this be true ? The residence rep said that unmeasured (untimed) FX service was no longer available. The per-call charges are the same as local measured service. The #5ESS switches and the time-sensitivity leads me to wonder about the implementation. Do they actually allocate a circuit (or subchannel on a T1) permanently, or do they allocate on the fly? Gee, could I get a fast busy from the local CO instead of remote dial-tone on a bad day? I assume that the real cost of providing service to residences and businesses are the same. I further believe that business usage IS rate sensitive. Is this assumption way off? If not, why are residences given more incentives (through lower rates, additional "plans", etc) to make more calls, yet businesses are not? The residence rep suggested that the coming Intra-Lata competition would precipitate a variety of new, more competitive rates and "packages". He also said that some "very short haul" Intra-Lata calls would be "protected" from competition. He was pretty sure that calls from our home town to the neighboring mountain town would be "protected". Why would/should any toll calls be protected from competition? ------------------------------ Subject: First National Bank Story Available Using FTP Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 17:17:20 -0700 From: Alex Griffiths Thanks for sending it along. If you want you can inform people that the file is available via anonymous ftp from ftp.ossi.com in /pub/first-national-bank-story. Any questions about the ftp service can be sent to me, dag@ossi.com. Cheers, alex [Moderator's Note: I mailed out several hundred copies of 'FNB, The Post Office and Me' over the past couple days. If it is easier for anyone to get it via FTP, the message above tells how. To those who requested it, I hope you enjoyed it! :) PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 19:14 GMT From: Bruce Sullivan Subject: Funny Newspaper Headlines > [Moderator's Note: Newspaper headlines can be very funny at times, and > occassionally it is quite by accident until after people see it in > print. Pat, Back in the late '70s, two local politicians were running against one another for (as I recall) a State House seat. One, Norm Dicks, has gone on to Washington DC as an esteemed CongressPerson. The other Gentleman, who has passed into obscurity (and whose first name I subsequently) can't recall) had the last name of Beaver. As you can imagine, the juxtapostition of those two names in print let to some entertaining headlines. One that I recall -- I still have a copy somewhere -- appeared in the {Seattle Post-Intelligencer}: "Chips Fly as Beaver and Dicks Meet." ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 10:39:45 MST From: John Shaver Subject: Ending Sentences With Propositions Pat, A friend of mine credits the line with a newspaperman named Carl Sandburg. It was intentional. [Moderator's Note: Sorry, I don't think that is correct. The very famed American poet Carl Sandburg *was* a music and theatre critic for the {Chicago Daily News} under the tenure of its first publisher Victor Lawson (for whom the Lawson YMCA here is named for any Chicago readers who care). But we are talking 1900-1915, when Sandburg was a resident here, and wrote his poems with Chicago as his subject. He moved to Michigan with his family sometime around 1915 or so, and only made an occassional appearance in the {Daily News} after that. He would have not been employed by the newspaper as late as 1935, that much I can tell you. Any journalism specialists among our readers who can recall the exact author of 'ending sentence with proposition'? PAT] ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #586 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa15966; 18 Aug 93 13:51 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA16578 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 20:41:53 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA17751 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Tue, 17 Aug 1993 20:41:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 20:41:13 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308180141.AA17751@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@delta.eecs.nwu.edu Subject: Call For Clipper Comments Too large for a regular issue of the Digest, and passed along FYI to the group. PAT Organization: CPSR Washington Office From: Dave Banisar Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 14:23:16 EST Subject: Call for Clipper Comments Call for Clipper Comments The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has issued a request for public comments on its proposal to establish the "Skipjack" key-escrow system as a Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS). The deadline for the submission of comments is September 28, 1993. The full text of the NIST notice follows. CPSR is urging all interested individuals and organizations to express their views on the proposal and to submit comments directly to NIST. Comments need not be lengthy or very detailed; all thoughtful statements addressing a particular concern will likely contribute to NIST's evaluation of the key-escrow proposal. The following points could be raised about the NIST proposal (additional materials on Clipper and the key escrow proposal may be found at the CPSR ftp site, cpsr.org): * The potential risks of the proposal have not been assessed and many questions about the implementation remain unanswered. The NIST notice states that the current proposal "does not include identification of key escrow agents who will hold the keys for the key escrow microcircuits or the procedures for access to the keys." The key escrow configuration may also create a dangerous vulnerability in a communications network. The risks of misuse of this feature should be weighed against any perceived benefit. * The classification of the Skipjack algorithm as a "national security" matter is inappropriate for technology that will be used primarily in civilian and commercial applications. Classification of technical information also limits the computing community's ability to evaluate fully the proposal and the general public's right to know about the activities of government. * The proposal was not developed in response to a public concern or a business request. It was put forward by the National Security Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation so that these two agencies could continue surveillance of electronic communications. It has not been established that is necessary for crime prevention. The number of arrests resulting from wiretaps has remained essentially unchanged since the federal wiretap law was enacted in 1968. * The NIST proposal states that the escrow agents will provide the key components to a government agency that "properly demonstrates legal authorization to conduct electronic surveillance of communications which are encrypted." The crucial term "legal authorization" has not been defined. The vagueness of the term "legal authorization" leaves open the possibility that court- issued warrants may not be required in some circumstances. This issue must be squarely addressed and clarified. * Adoption of the proposed key escrow standard may have an adverse impact upon the ability of U.S. manufacturers to market cryptographic products abroad. It is unlikely that non-U.S. users would purchase communication security products to which the U.S. government holds keys. Comments on the NIST proposal should be sent to: Director, Computer Systems Laboratory ATTN: Proposed FIPS for Escrowed Encryption Standard Technology Building, Room B-154 National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Submissions must be received by September 28, 1993. CPSR has asked NIST that provisions be made to allow for electronic submission of comments. Please also send copies of your comments on the key escrow proposal to CPSR for inclusion in the CPSR Internet Library, our ftp site. Copies should be sent to . ================================================================= FEDERAL REGISTER VOL. 58, No. 145 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (DOC) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Docket No. 930659-3159 RIN 0693-AB19 A Proposed Federal Information Processing Standard for an Escrowed Encryption Standard (EES) 58 FR 40791 Friday, July 30, 1993 Notice; request for comments. SUMMARY: A Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) for an Escrowed Encryption Standard (EES) is being proposed. This proposed standard specifies use of a symmetric-key encryption/decryption algorithm and a key escrowing method which are to be implemented in electronic devices and used for protecting certain unclassified government communications when such protection is required. The algorithm and the key escrowing method are classified and are referenced, but not specified, in the standard. This proposed standard adopts encryption technology developed by the Federal government to provide strong protection for unclassified information and to enable the keys used in the encryption and decryption processes to be escrowed. This latter feature will assist law enforcement and other government agencies, under the proper legal authority, in the collection and decryption of electronically transmitted information. This proposed standard does not include identification of key escrow agents who will hold the keys for the key escrow microcircuits or the procedures for access to the keys. These issues will be addressed by the Department of Justice. The purpose of this notice is to solicit views from the public, manufacturers, and Federal, state, and local government users so that their needs can be considered prior to submission of this proposed standard to the Secretary of Commerce for review and approval. The proposed standard contains two sections: (1) An announcement section, which provides information concerning the applicability, implementation, and maintenance of the standard; and (2) a specifications section which deals with the technical aspects of the standard. Both sections are provided in this notice. DATES: Comments on this proposed standard must be received on or before September 28, 1993. ADDRESSES: Written comments concerning the proposed standard should be sent to: Director, Computer Systems Laboratory, ATTN: Proposed FIPS for Escrowed Encryption Standard, Technology Building, room B-154, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Written comments received in response to this notice will be made part of the public record and will be made available for inspection and copying in the Central Reference and Records Inspection Facility, room 6020, Herbert C. Hoover Building, 14th Street between Pennsylvania and Constitution Avenues, NW., Washington, DC 20230. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Dennis Branstad, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, telephone (301) 975-2913. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed FIPS implements the initiative announced by the White House Office of the Press Secretary on April 16, 1993. The President of the U.S. approved a Public Encryption Management directive, which among other actions, called for standards to facilitate the procurement and use of encryption devices fitted with key-escrow microcircuits in Federal communication systems that process sensitive, but unclassified information. Dated: July 26, 1993. Arati Prabhakar, Director.(NIST) ---------------------------------------------------- Federal Information Processing Standards Publication XX 1993 XX Announcing the Escrowed Encryption Standard (EES) Federal Information Processing Standards Publications (FIPS PUBS) are issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) after approval by the Secretary of Commerce pursuant to section 111(d) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 as amended by the Computer Security Act of 1987, Public Law 100-235. Name of Standard: Escrowed Encryption Standard (EES). Category of Standard: Telecommunications Security. Explanation: This Standard specifies use of a symmetric-key encryption (and decryption) algorithm and a Law Enforcement Access Field (LEAF) creation method (one part of a key escrow system) which provide for decryption of encrypted telecommunications when interception of the telecommunications is lawfully authorized. Both the algorithm and the LEAF creation method are to be implemented in electronic devices (e.g., very large scale integration chips). The devices may be incorporated in security equipment used to encrypt (and decrypt) sensitive unclassified telecommunications data. Decryption of lawfully intercepted telecommunications may be achieved through the acquisition and use of the LEAF, the decryption algorithm and escrowed key components. To escrow something (e.g., a document, an encryption key) means that it is "delivered to a third person to be given to the grantee only upon the fulfillment of a condition" (Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary). A key escrow system is one that entrusts components of a key used to encrypt telecommunications to third persons, called key component escrow agents. In accordance with the common definition of "escrow", the key component escrow agents provide the key components to a "grantee" (i.e., a government agency) only upon fulfillment of the condition that the grantee properly demonstrates legal authorization to conduct electronic surveillance of communications which are encrypted using the specific device whose key component is requested. The key components obtained through this process are then used by the grantee to reconstruct the device unique key and obtain the session key (contained in the LEAF) which is used to decrypt the telecommunications that are encrypted with that device. The term, "escrow", for purposes of this standard, is restricted to the dictionary definition. The encryption/decryption algorithm has been approved for government applications requiring encryption of sensitive unclassified telecommunications of data as defined herein. The specific operations of the algorithm and the LEAF creation method are classified and hence are referenced, but not specified, in this standard. Data, for purposes of this standard, includes voice, facsimile and computer information communicated in a telephone system. Telephone system, for purposes of this standard, is limited to systems circuit-switched up to no more than 14.4 kbs or which use basic-rate ISDN, or to a similar grade wireless service. Data that is considered sensitive by a responsible authority should be encrypted if it is vulnerable to unauthorized disclosure during telecommunications. A risk analysis should be performed under the direction of a responsible authority to determine potential threats and risks. The costs of providing encryption using this standard as well as alternative methods and their respective costs should be projected. A responsible authority should then make a decision, based on the risk and cost analyses, whether or not to use encryption and then whether or not to use this standard. Approving Authority: Secretary of Commerce. Maintenance Agency: Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Applicability: This standard is applicable to all Federal departments and agencies and their contractors under the conditions specified below. This standard may be used in designing and implementing security products and systems which Federal departments and agencies use or operate or which are operated for them under contract. These products may be used when replacing Type II and Type III (DES) encryption devices and products owned by the government and government contractors. This standard may be used when the following conditions apply: 1. An authorized official or manager responsible for data security or the security of a computer system decides that encryption is required and cost justified as per OMB Circular A- 130; and 2. The data is not classified according to the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, or the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. However, Federal departments or agencies which use encryption devices for protecting data that is classified according to either of these acts may use those devices also for protecting unclassified data in lieu of this standard. In addition, this standard may be adopted and used by non- Federal Government organizations. Such use is encouraged when it provides the desired security. Applications: Devices conforming to this standard may be used for protecting unclassified communications. Implementations: The encryption/decryption algorithm and the LEAF creation method shall be implemented in electronic devices (e.g., electronic chip packages) that can be physically protected against unauthorized entry, modification and reverse engineering. Implementations which are tested and validated by NIST will be considered as complying with this standard. An electronic device shall be incorporated into a cyptographic module in accordance with FIPS 140-1. NIST will test for conformance with FIPS 140-1. Cryptographic modules can then be integrated into security equipment for sale and use in an application. Information about devices that have been validated, procedures for testing equipment for conformance with NIST standards, and information about obtaining approval of security equipment are available from the Computer Systems Laboratory, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Export Control: Implementations of this standard are subject to Federal Government export controls as specified in title 22, Code of Federal Regulations, parts 120 through 131 (International Traffic of Arms Regulations -ITAR). Exporters of encryption devices, equipment and technical data are advised to contact the U.S. Department of State, Office of Defense Trade Controls for more information. Patents: Implementations of this standard may be covered by U.S. and foreign patents. Implementation Schedule: This standard becomes effective thirty days following publication of this FIPS PUB. Specifications: Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS XXX)(affixed). Cross Index: a. FIPS PUB 46-2, Data Encryption Standard. b. FIPS PUB 81, Modes of Operation of the DES c. FIPS PUB 140-1, Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules. Glossary: The following terms are used as defined below for purposes of this standard: Data-Voice, facsimile and computer information communicated in a telephone system. Decryption-Conversion of ciphertext to plaintext through the use of a cryptographic algorithm. Device (cryptographic)-An electronic implementation of the encryption/decryption algorithm and the LEAF creation method as specified in this standard. Digital data-Data that have been converted to a binary representation. Encryption-Conversion of plaintext to ciphertext through the use of a cryptographic algorithm. Key components-The values from which a key can be derived (e.g., KU sub 1 + KU sub 2). Key escrow -A process involving transferring one or more components of a cryptographic key to one or more trusted key component escrow agents for storage and later use by government agencies to decrypt ciphertext if access to the plaintext is lawfully authorized. LEAF Creation Method 1-A part of a key escrow system that is implemented in a cryptographic device and creates a Law Enforcement Access Field. Type I cryptography-A cryptographic algorithm or device approved by the National Security Agency for protecting classified information. Type II cryptography-A cryptographic algorithm or device approved by the National Security Agency for protecting sensitive unclassified information in systems as specified in section 2315 of Title 10 United State Code, or section 3502(2) of Title 44, United States Code. Type III cryptography-A cryptographic algorithm or device approved as a Federal Information Processing Standard. Type III(E) cryptography-A Type III algorithm or device that is approved for export from the United States. Qualifications. The protection provided by a security product or system is dependent on several factors. The protection provided by this standard against key search attacks is greater than that provided by the DES (e.g., the cryptographic key is longer). However, provisions of this standard are intended to ensure that information encrypted through use of devices implementing this standard can be decrypted by a legally authorized entity. Where to Obtain Copies of the Standard: Copies of this publication are for sale by the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161. When ordering, refer to Federal Information Processing Standards Publication XX (FIPS PUB XX), and identify the title. When microfiche is desired, this should be specified. Prices are published by NTIS in current catalogs and other issuances. Payment may be made by check, money order, deposit account or charged to a credit card accepted by NTIS. Specifications for the Escrowed Encryption Standard 1. Introduction This publication specifies Escrowed Encryption Standard (EES) functions and parameters. 2. General This standard specifies use of the SKIPJACK cryptographic algorithm and the LEAF Creation Method 1 (LCM-1) to be implemented in an approved electronic device (e.g., a very large scale integration electronic chip). The device is contained in a logical cryptographic module which is then integrated in a security product for encrypting and decrypting telecommunications. Approved implementations may be procured by authorized organizations for integration into security equipment. Devices must be tested and validated by NIST for conformance to this standard. Cryptographic modules must be tested and validated by NIST for conformance to FIPS 140-1. 3. Algorithm Specifications The specifications of the encryption/decryption algorithm (SKIPJACK) and the LEAF Creation Method 1 (LCM-1) are classified. The National Security Agency maintains these classified specifications and approves the manufacture of devices which implement the specifications. NIST tests for conformance of the devices implementing this standard in cryptographic modules to FIPS 140-1 and FIPS 81. 4. Functions and Parameters 4.1 Functions The following functions, at a minimum, shall be implemented: 1. Data Encryption: A session key (80 bits) shall be used to encrypt plaintext information in one or more of the following modes of operation as specified in FIPS 81: ECB, CBC, OFB (64) CFB (1, 8, 16, 32, 64). 2. Data Decryption: The session key (80 bits) used to encrypt the data shall be used to decrypt resulting ciphertext to obtain the data. 3. Key Escrow: The Family Key (KF) shall be used to create the Law Enforcement Access Field (LEAF) in accordance with the LEAF Creation Method 1 (LCM-1). The Session Key shall be encrypted with the Device Unique Key and transmitted as part of the LEAF. The security equipment shall ensure that the LEAF is transmitted in such a manner that the LEAF and ciphertext may be decrypted with legal authorization. No additional encryption or modification of the LEAF is permitted. 4.2 Parameters The following parameters shall be used in performing the prescribed functions: 1. Device Identifier (DID): The identifier unique to a particular device and used by the Key Escrow System. 2. Device Unique Key (KU): The cryptographic key unique to a particular device and used by the Key Escrow System. 3. Cryptographic Protocol Field (CPF): The field identifying the registered cryptographic protocol used by a particular application and used by the Key Escrow System (reserved for future specification and use). 4. Escrow Authenticator (EA): A binary pattern that is inserted in the LEAF to ensure that the LEAF is transmitted and received properly and has not been modified, deleted or replaced in an unauthorized manner. 5. Initialization Vector (IV): A mode and application dependent vector of bytes used to initialize, synchronize and verify the encryption, decryption and key escrow functions. 6. Family Key (KF): The cryptographic key stored in all devices designated as a family that is used to create the LEAF. 7. Session Key (KS): The cryptographic key used by a device to encrypt and decrypt data during a session. 8. Law Enforcement Access Field (LEAF): The field containing the encrypted session key and the device identifier and the escrow authenticator. 5. Implementation The Cryptographic Algorithm and the LEAF Creation Method shall be implemented in an electronic device (e.g., VLSI chip) which is highly resistant to reverse engineering (destructive or non- destructive) to obtain or modify the cryptographic algorithms, the DID, the KF, the KU, the EA, the CPF, the operational KS, or any other security or Key Escrow System relevant information. The device shall be able to be programmed/personalized (i.e., made unique) after mass production in such a manner that the DID, KU (or its components), KF (or its components) and EA fixed pattern can be entered once (and only once) and maintained without external electrical power. The LEAF and the IV shall be transmitted with the ciphertext. The specifics of the protocols used to create and transmit the LEAF, IV, and encrypted data shall be registered and a CPF assigned. The CPF shall then be transmitted in accordance with the registered specifications. The specific electric, physical and logical interface will vary with the implementation. Each approved, registered implementation shall have an unclassified electrical, physical and logical interface specification sufficient for an equipment manufacturer to understand the general requirements for using the device. Some of the requirements may be classified and therefore would not be specified in the unclassified interface specification. -------------------------- [Moderator's Note: I've a feeling this may have truncated prematurely, but this is where it stopped on the copy I got here. If there is anything of essence missing, Dave Banisar can let us know. PAT]   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa19027; 18 Aug 93 17:35 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA10494 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Wed, 18 Aug 1993 14:51:50 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA12905 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Wed, 18 Aug 1993 14:51:06 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 14:51:06 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308181951.AA12905@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #587 TELECOM Digest Wed, 18 Aug 93 14:51:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 587 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Telephony in 1926, Part 1 of ??? (Jim Haynes) Bionomics Conference to Explore the Telecosm (Alan T. Furman) Hey Warren! What are These? (harveyb@tecnet1.jcte.jcs.mil) Re: Last Laugh! Here We Go Again: What Are These? (Barry Mishkind) Warren the Mass Poster (Doug Sewell) Warren Victorian (Cliff Sharp) Our "Friend" Warren Victorian (Stephen Diercouff) Warren Did it Again (Bill Zimmer) He's Gone (John R. Grout) FTP Address Does Not Work (Eric A. Yruegas) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: haynes@cats.ucsc.edu (Jim Haynes) Subject: Telephony in 1926, Part 1 of ??? Date: 18 Aug 1993 06:19:46 GMT Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz I was recently given a copy of the Southwestern Bell employee magazine "Southwestern Telephone News", issue of October 1926, which was Volume 13, No. 10 and hence must have started publication about 1913. This article will be a summary of the contents; perhaps I'll type in or review particular articles later. The front cover shows a cable splicer hanging from a strand as he splices an underground cable to an aerial cable in Dallas. Repeated several times througout the issue is, "New Long Distance rates and practices went into effect on October 1st. Pamphlets giving full information on these changes are available for all employees. Study the rates carefully so that you can answer the questions of subscribers." I remember this attitude, that all employees should be prepared to represent the company to the public, was later embodied in a slogan, "To the public _you_ are the telephone company," that was constantly presented to employees. On page 2 is a photograph of sheep with their heads in the grass, and an amusing caption: "Sheep (Eating). In July, our explanation that the folks in the frontspiece were stacking wheat brought a protest from Kansas that they were not stacking but were shocking wheat. This time we take no chances. Grazing, as we remember, is the right term, but we are not sheepherders. (Texas panhandle, please note.)" The first article is a bio of Charles P. Cooper, former president of Ohio Bell who was just elected vice-president of AT&T. Next there are five pages with pictures reporting on a Telephone Pioneers meeting in New York City. Among other activities they visited AT&T headquarters, Bell Labs, and New York Telephone headquarters and were greeted by executives of those companies. The highlight was an address by Thomas A. Watson, who told of his experiences as a colleague of Alexander Graham Bell. This was followed by a demonstration of talking movies, including one depicting the invention of the telephone and narrated by Watson. Then there is an article "Efficient and Courteous" by an anonymous "counterman". He tells of receiving a letter of commendation from a customer. Even though he had had to turn down the customer's request for service he had fully explained why there was a shortage of facilities in the customer's area, and the problems of the company in extending its lines. Then the medical director of AT&T writes to those who have just returned from vacations, urging them to use their spare time during the week as a "vacation all year." He suggests they get out of doors, do the essential chores, of course, but do something recreational. "... forget as far as possible that you ever worked for the Telephone Company." The telephone exhibit at the Philadelphia Sesquicentennial Exposition is described, with a reminder that the telephone was first exhibited at the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia 50 years earlier. The 1926 exhibit includes a showing of motion pictures, two of which are talking. One of these features Thomas A. Watson [and is presumably the same film that was shown to the Pioneers]; and the other "contrasts the noisy operating room and crude apparatus of the eighties, when boys were operators, with the central office of the present." I guess in those days AT&T stock was marketed through telephone offices, as there is an article about how an AT&T rights offering was handled. There are accounts of company employees persuading the public to buy stock, and also of people who threw away the rights documents, not realizing they had monetary value. There's a sort item about telephone operators assisting when there was an explosion at a high school, and another showing the first installation of a P.A. system in a school, with switching so that music or voice can be had in any combination of rooms. Then there is the second part of an article reprinted from {Telephony} by an operator, Manta J. Elder, about her experiences. There were annual floods when the Marais-des-Cygnes overran its banks near Ottawa, Kansas. Many operators lived across the river from the telephone office and had to cross the river in canoes and stay at the office so they would be available. Also severe winters when the streets were impassable to vehicles and the company sent horses to the residence of each operator to bring them to work. Sleet storms in February took lines down, so things were very quiet at the switchboard until service was restored; and then everybody wanted to use the telephone. She tells of working the last day at an old switchboard before cutover to a new one in a new office. "The next day I went by the old office, and my feet naturally led me up the old stairway. If I had known that I should see the salvaging force at their work, I would never had have the courage to enter the old room. The board was already sadly wrecked. It seemed to me that I was looking upon something almost human, which was being made to suffer after years of patient and loving service to a public which now gives it no thought. "As I walked on toward my home, I fell to thinking of the many and varied messages that had been carried through that old public servant. The first news of special interest to all people handled through its channels was the news of Admiral Dewey's victory at Manila Bay, which occurred about three weeks after the installation of the board. "Service began on this old switchboard June 13, 1898, and except for one hour during President McKinley's funeral, until December, 1915, it was a living part of the community it so faithfully served." She goes on to tell of the World War, and of the influenza epidemic. Says that in earlier times the telephone operators often complained that they were not appreciated by the public, but at the time of writing most people are truly appreciative of their services. A little of the history of the company, which was originally the Kansas City Telephone company, called the "Home" Company; at the time of abandonment of the old switchboard the "Home" and "Bell" companies were consolidated under the name of "The Kansas Telephone Company", in the spring of 1915. On January 1, 1926, the company was transferred to Southwestern Bell. Then there are three pages of managerial personnel changes, with some portraits. Then an article about formation of the Charles S. Gleed chapter of Telephone Pioneers in Kansas City, and an article about the switchboard in St. Louis being extremely busy in the aftermath of the St. Louis Cardinals winning the National League pennant. A page of short items: Clemenceau quoted on the need for technical experts to be aware of matters outside the scope of their expertise; a comment on the article by "a counterman"; an article about the recent AT&T stock issue; and a repeat of the item about new long distance rates and practices. Four pages with pictures about Bell Telephone Laboratores, and some unrelated pictures of employees enjoying their summer vacations. Two pages about Texas beginning a new billing method: instead of billing all customers on the same day of the month they will spread the billing dates throughout the month to smooth out the workload. Two pages about handling mail in the headquarters mail room, the need for good addresses, and the problem of customers sending cash in the mail when paying their bills; an average of $15 a day is found in the mail room when the supervisor has to open inadequately addressed mail. Then a rather technical article, with schematic diagram, of a circuit to simplify cutting phantom transpositions. (When a phantom circuit is added to two existing circuits it is necessary to alter the way the wires are transposed on the poles. This must be done without interrupting service on the exiting circuits any longer than necessary.) Two pages of service records, including portraits of seven men who have worked a total of 185 years. One page about the "first annual" Watermelon Festival in Hope, AR. An article about keeping score on collection work; teams get points for minimizing the need to communicate with subscribers to get them to pay their bills. Photographs of the new Norman, OK office, and an open house for visitors. Suggestions for Halloween costumes (illustrations) and two pages of illustrations of ladies' fashion suggestions. A page of cartoons by "Stack", with a Halloween theme. Three pages telling where every construction crew is working and what jobs they are working on. Some photos, including a cable splicer and his helper with what appears to be a push cart containing their tools and supplies. A page with a map of the company's territory, showing the locations of all lost-time accidents for the year. Four pages of social news: parties, retirements, contests won, other activities. "Anyone at St. Louis Toll who wants a thrill, should let Miss Hogan take them riding in her Ford. She misses other cars by a fender." A page "What I Did Today" containing stories by operators of how they assisted the public. A page of poetry written by telephone people. Inside back cover, a list of the principal management officers of the company and their titles. Back cover, an AT&T advertisement. This one shows operators being delivered to their office in a truck in a howling blizzard; and the text tells how people take the telephone for granted, how different life would be without it, and how 300,000 telephone people work to maintain dependable service. haynes@cats.ucsc.edu haynes@cats.bitnet [Moderator's Note: Wow!! Thanks *very much*. I hope all the readers got as much of a charge from your article as I did. Keep sending in those old items when you find them. Would you be willing to make copies of that magazine and send them at cost to me or other readers who ask for a copy? I am putting your article especially in the archives for further reference. PAT] ------------------------------ From: atfurman@cup.portal.com Subject: Bionomics Conference to Explore the Telecosm Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 23:04:29 PDT Passed along FYI. From: "Michael L. Rothschild" Subject: Bionomics Conference Announcement CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT The Next Economy: An Evolving Information Ecosystem The Sheraton at Fisherman's Wharf San Francisco, California Friday & Saturday October 8 & 9, 1993 New technology is not just modifying the economy, it is transforming the fundamental nature of economic life. You are invited to attend the first conference of the Bionomics Institute, an event which will bring together leading-edge thinkers from a remarkable variety of disciplines-for the purpose of exploring the technological, economic, and political implications of this epochal shift. We all recognize that the revolution in information technology is changing our lives; but, how can we best comprehend what is happening and what will happen next? How must we reshape our basic thinking about the world to make the most of the coming changes in our personal lives, our business strategies, and our public policy? Join us for two days of fresh, stimulating insights and discussion. And bring an interested/ing friend. Space is limited. Register early George Gilder, keynote speaker A leading thinker and writer on information technology, and its impact on the economy, George Gilder will be our featured speaker. Widely admired for his penetrating analyses, he is the author of many books including: Wealth and Poverty, The Spirit of Enterprise, Microcosm and the forthcoming Telecosm. His work stresses the role of markets and entrepreneurial creativity in the emergence of the new technologies that are reshaping the world. Friday, October 8, 1993 Of Nodes & Networks--Twin Revolutions in Technology Federico Faggin, CEO of Synaptics, maker of neural network chips, led the team that developed the original Intel microprocessor Gilbert Amelio, CEO of National Semiconductor, inventor of the CCD (Charged Coupled Device) Carver Mead, Professor at CalTech, pioneer of VLSI silicon compilation technology and the silicon foundry business model of the new wave semiconductor industry Dan Lynch, Chairman and Founder of Interop, presentor of the leading computer networking trade show and conference Into the Telecosm George Gilder, keynote address Bionomic Thinking for a New Economy Bernd Heinrich, author of Bumblebee Economics, Professor of Zoology, University of Vermont Jack Birner, Professor of Economics, University of Maastricht Michael Riordan, M.D., CEO of Gilead Sciences, a biotech firm which employs "directed evolution" to discover new drugs Mark S. Miller, Chief Technical Officer, Agoric Enterprises Don Lavoie, Assistant Professor of Economics, George Mason University, Chairman, Program on Social & Organizational Learning Michael Rothschild, President, The Bionomics Institute, author of Bionomics, columnist for Upside and Forbes ASAP Saturday, October 9, 1993 Simulating Evolution: Demonstration & Workshop Tom Ray, Professor of Ecology, University of Delaware will demonstrate Tierra, a remarkable computer model which simulates spontaneous self-organization and evolution. Featured in Newsweek and other major publications, Tom Ray's work represents a critical breakthrough in our understanding of evolution. The Emerging Global Superorganism Gregory Stock, Senior Fellow, Woodrow Wilson School, author of the forthcoming Metaman: The Merging of Humans and Machines into a Global Superorganism Accelerating Evolution Through New Public Policy John Baden, Chairman, Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment, and noted expert on market-based environmentalism Cynthia Beltz, Policy Analyst, American Enterprise Institute, and expert on high-tech industrial policy Marguerite Callaway, Principal, KPMG Peat Marwick's National Health Care Strategy Practice John L. Petersen, President of the Arlington Institute, and noted expert on information technology and national security Robert Poole, Jr., President, The Reason Foundation, and noted expert on privatization of the public infrastructure Michael Rothschild, President, The Bionomics Institute Registration Fee The registration fee includes the program, light breakfast and lunch on Friday and Saturday, and related reading materials. Orders should be sent to: The Bionomics Institute 2173 East Fransisco Blvd, Suite C San Rafael, CA 94901 (415) 454 1000 Credit card registrations may be faxed to (415) 454-7460. Postmarked: by Sept. 10 after Sept. 10 Regular $150 $175 Student $75 $100 One day (specify day) $100 $125 Total amount: $_____________________________ Name: ______________________________________ Title: _____________________________________ Organization: ______________________________ Address: ___________________________________ City: _______________ State: ___ Zip: ______ Phone: ________________ Fax: _______________ EMail: _____________________________________ Card #: ___________________ Exp Date: ______ Signature: _________________________________ Payment may be made by VISA, Mastercard, check or international money order valid in the U.S. Make checks payable to "The Bionomics Institute;" checks and bank drafts must be in U.S. dollars drawn on a U.S. bank. Refunds of registration fees can only be made on receipt of a written request which must be postmarked no later than September 15, and are subject to a $25 administrative fee. Site & Accomodations Conference sessions will be held at the Sheraton at Fisherman's Wharf. Accomodation arrangements should be made directly with the hotel. Reservations should be made by September 10. When making reservations, mention that you are attending the Bionomics Institute Conference to obtain the lower conference room rate. Deposits in the amount of the first night's stay plus tax are required to guarantee reservations, these are refundable until 6pm on the date of arrival. Sheraton at Fisherman's Wharf 2500 Mason Street San Fransisco, CA 94133 (415) 362 5500 fax: (415) 956 5275 Room rate: $120 Single or double occupancy plus 12% tax. Trasportation: Information on ground transportation and maps will be mailed to registrants. About The Bionomics Institute Exploring the New Economics of the Information Age Two decades after the microprocessor's invention, the world economy is in the throes of an epochal transformation--from the Machine Age to the Information Age. Unfortunately, traditional schools of economic thought offer insufficient insight into the fundamental nature of the emerging Information Age economy. We are entering uncharted territory. To meet this challenge, bionomics suggests a new economic paradigm. Where mainstream economics is based on concepts borrowed from classical Newtonian physics, bionomics is derived from the teachings of modern evolutionary biology. Where orthodox thinking describes the economy as a static, predictable engine, bionomics sees the economy as a self-organizing, "chaotic" information ecosystem. Where the traditional view sees organizations as production machines, bionomics sees organizations as intelligent social organisms. Where conventional business strategy focuses on physical capital, bionomics holds that organizational learning is the ultimate source of all profit and growth. If the radical restructuring of business and governmental institutions now underway were informed by bionomics, the transformation would be far more effective and far less costly. Consequently, The Bionomics Institute seeks to educate corporate leaders, policy makers, and the general public about bionomics. The Bionomics Institute pursues these objectives through public conferences, executive seminars, consulting relationships, and publications. ----------------------- Forwarded to the Internet TELECOM Digest by Alan T. Furman atfurman@cup.portal.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 13:34:02 EDT From: harveyb@tecnet1.jcte.jcs.mil Subject: Hey Warren! What are These? Pat - thought you might enjoy this - interesting concept! (grin). Regards, Harvey Forward message follows. To: tecnet@tecnet1.jcte.jcs.mil From: Russ Kepler Posted: Aug 17 08:26 Subject: Re: What are these? > I found these wierd international phone sex lines in a magazine the > otherday and I was just wondering how these people can offer a service > like this for free. It makes no sence to me. Anyways it is pretty hardcore > and anyone into that type of stuff should give it a shout. I decided that someone as clever as Mr. "Victorian" needed something else to occupy his time, so I sent him a chunk of /unix (uuencoded, natch) and a full copy of /etc/termcap. I think that'll help him occupy his time rather than attempting scams on the readers of the firearms mailing list. I'm not suggesting mail bombing him, just noting what I felt was an appropriate response to the rest of the list. Remember, his mailing address was: warren@cyberspace.com. Russ [Moderator's Note: Actually, people *have* flooded the sysadmin there with complaint mail. Please stop writing him. Thanks. PAT] ------------------------------ From: barry@coyote.datalog.com (barry mishkind) Subject: Re: Last Laugh! Here We Go Again: What Are these? Organization: Datalog Consulting, Tucson, AZ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 17:20:39 GMT In article warren@cyberspace.com (Warren Victorian) writes: > I found these wierd international phone sex lines in a magazine the > other day and I was just wondering how these people can offer a service > like this for free. It makes no sense to me. Anyways it is pretty > hardcore and anyone into that type of stuff should give it a shout. > [Moderator's Note: Gosh, not this one again. What's up Warren? Did > Seth leave and get another job, or is this his day off? Since I assume Apparently the "boys" have reached the "rec.arts.*" groups, as a whole bunch of them got hit this morning. May they end up with really bent fingers! Barry Mishkind barry@coyote.datalog.com Tucson, Arizona ------------------------------ From: doug@cc.ysu.edu (Doug Sewell) Subject: Warren the Mass Poster Date: 17 Aug 1993 22:14:23 GMT Organization: Youngstown State University From Warren's system administrator (re: "what are these numbers" posts). (Incidentally, Warren's system, according to the header I saw before I them all away, as well as the NIC "whois" database, is in the Seattle W. Washington area (AC 206), just like Seth's accounts were.) [ Article crossposted from news.admin.policy ] [ Author was Brian Cartmell (brc@cyberspace.com) ] [ Posted on 17 Aug 1993 10:45:22 -0700 ] Ok, I have received about 1200+ messages on this user and expect about another 1000+. I'm still in the process of checking all the facts out and shall post the findings later today. The user 'warren' account has been expired and I don't think this kind of thing is going to happen again. I don't really want to screen all outgoing postings but I shall if I feel its going to stop activities like this. Brian sysadmin at cyberspace.com ------------- Doug Sewell, Tech Support, Computer Center, Youngstown State University doug@cc.ysu.edu doug@ysub.bitnet !cc.ysu.edu!doug ------------------------------ Subject: Warren Victorian Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 0:38:55 CDT From: Cliff Sharp I did a little research on the 011-239-xxx-xxxx numbers. Country code 239 is for an island called Sao Tome, near the equator and just off the coast of Guinea and/or Gabon in Africa. (I suppose this qualifies the provider as having "the hottest sex line in the world". :-) Calls to this number from area code 708 are $3.44 for the first minute and $2.96 for every minute following. The AT&T operator who provided me with the name of the "country" also suggested that phone numbers on that island are probably five-digit numbers, so the seven digits provided (differing only in the last two digits) are probably for the same telephone line and intended to make the average person think a seven-digit number implies a intranational call. Cliff Sharp clifto@indep1.chi.il.us OR clifto@indep1.uucp WA9PDM Use whichever one works [Moderator's Note: We understand and sympathize, Cliff. You only called those numbers for the sake of research. It must have been a difficult and uncomfortable assignment for you. Ah, the sacrifices we must make at times, but someone had to do it! :) PAT] ------------------------------ From: sgd@tfm.com (Stephen Diercouff) Subject: Our "Friend" Warren Victorian Organization: tfm Associates, Ltd. Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 04:27:03 GMT I thought you might be interested in how far Seth/Warren has progressed in his perusal of the newsgroup hierarchy. This is from rec.antiques. > In article <1993Aug17.104311.52663@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> mouse@kuhub. cc.ukans.edu writes: >> In article <24q11e$ku4@cyberspace.com>, warren@cyberspace.com >> (Warren Victorian) writes: >>> I found these wierd international phone sex lines in a magazine the >> Dear Warren... >> Antiques ALWAYS cost a lot of money, and antique sex lines are >> especially popular at the moment. The numbers you have listed are >> actually serial numbers which demonstrate the lines were pro- >> duced between 1893 and 1911... not quite antique, I agree, but >> certainly of interest to a specialist collector in that genre. > Oh. So that's the deal. I thought you'd call these lines and get > really old people telling you to keep your knickers buttoned and > threatening to wash your mouth out with soap if you said nasty words. Regards, Stephen Diercouff, tfm Associates, Ltd., Bellingham WA voice: +1 206 733 5721 Internet: sgd@tfm.com fax: +1 206 738 0630 UUCP: uunet!nwnexus!tfm!sgd Snail: P.O. Box 5084/Bellingham WA 98227-5084 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 11:28:33 EDT From: zim@IBX.COM (Bill Zimmer) Subject: Warren Did it Again Pat, Warren evidently sent his message again to every newsgroup in existance yesterday. The following is from news.admin.policy: From: brc@cyberspace.com (Brian Cartmell) Newsgroups: news.admin.policy Subject: Re: WARREN THE MASS POSTER Date: 17 Aug 1993 21:50:41 -0700 Organization: (CYBERSPACE) Public Internet 206.286.1600 Brian Cartmell (brc@cyberspace.com) wrote: > Ok, I have received about 1200+ messages on this user and expect about > another 1000+. I'm still in the process of checking all the facts out > and shall post the findings later today, the user 'warren' account has > been expired and I dont think this kind of thing is going to happen > again, I dont really want to screen all outgoing postings but I shall > if I feel its going to stop activities like this. > -Brian sysadmin at cyberspace.com Its me again, well now I have received over 3000 messages from some really great people, and if that wasn't enough I now have fake email messages coming in from fake addresses complaining about this guy. I'll post more later. Brian ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 17:09:22 CDT From: grout@csrd.uiuc.edu (John R. Grout) Subject: He's Gone Reply-To: j-grout@uiuc.edu [stuff deleted] > [Moderator's Note: Gosh, not this one again. What's up Warren? Did > Seth leave and get another job, or is this his day off? Since I assume > you *know* how it is done (Lord knows everyone else on the net knows > by now), I won't bother to explain it again. I deleted those numbers > again also. At my request, cyberspace pulled Warren's plug. John R. Grout INTERNET: j-grout@uiuc.edu [Moderator's Note: At *your* request? Isn't that something! :) PAT] ------------------------------ From: cp01081@dcsc.dla.mil (Eric A Yruegas) Subject: FTP Address Given Does Not Work Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 12:06:48 EDT Do you still have a copy of 'FNB and The Post Office & Me you could send my way? I tried to mail dag@ossi.com but got bounced mail ... FTP yields no connection ... :( :( Thanks in advance Pat! Eric Yruegas (A most avid TELECOM Digest reader!) cp01081@dcsc.dla.mil [Moderator's Note: Your copy was mailed to you, along with 489 other requests in the past couple days. I do not know why dag@ossi.com said his address and FTP connection would work if it does not. Maybe he will see this and repair it. My fingers are getting almost as sore as Warren Victorian's must be. PAT] ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #587 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa19883; 18 Aug 93 19:04 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA11668 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Wed, 18 Aug 1993 16:22:44 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA14538 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Wed, 18 Aug 1993 16:22:00 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 16:22:00 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308182122.AA14538@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #588 TELECOM Digest Wed, 18 Aug 93 16:21:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 588 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson 100% Moderation of News Groups - NOT (Paul Robinson) Re: 100% Moderation of News Groups - NOT (Erik E. Fair) Interconnect Schematics (Shelf, Cabinet Documentation, etc.) (M. Feil) World Record in Password Checking (Mark Boolootian) Orange Card Woes (Dave Rand) AT&T #206A2 Telephone Line Test Handsets (Christopher Zguris) What is RASCOM and S.I.T? (Keith Laaks) Telex <-> Internet Email? (Larry Walker) Touch-Tone Phones in Hong Kong (Hon Wah Chin) Category of Tones Used in CO (Yee-Lee Shyong) Wanted: Caller-Id With Serial Interface to PC (R. Vasan) Kids Having Phun With Phones (Doreen Hansen) Re: New Jersey Pulls the Plug on Computer-Dialed Calls (Gary Merinstein) Re: UUNet 900 Seems to be a Bad Idea (Robert J Woodhead) Re: UUNet 900 Seems to be a Bad Idea (Roy M. Silvernail) Re: FCC Equal Access Order (Charles Frankston) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 13:52:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul Robinson Reply-To: Paul Robinson Subject: 100% Moderation of News Groups. NOT. Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA Patrick Townson , Moderator of TELECOM Digest (comp.dcom.telecom newsgroup) wrote in an issue of the Digest: > I think we will see a number of changes in news as private ownership > of the net gets underway. More than half of the Internet was already privately operated long before the changes being proposed were announced. > Among other things, a large number of unmoderated newsgroups > will be dropped, and requirements for posting will be > tightened up. Good idea? No, not really, but I feel it is almost > surely bound to happen. As long as sites take a group, exactly 'who' is going to drop them? Unless the sites that are taking news decide to stop carrying the feeds, and the intermediate sites stop carrying traffic, the groups will continue to operate. Or are you claiming AT&T is going to tell sites they can't carry news groups until they moderate them? And who is going to order this 'tightening up' of posting? And what exactly do they intend to do to those who don't comply? Internet is essentially an anarchy with a very small amount of control over the content; short of a major "earthquake" class change, I find the type of changes forseen as extreme. What is the method? Metering of traffic and very high traffic charges? Refusal to allow access to the NNTP port using TCP/IP? And don't forget that UUNET started the Alternet (ALT.*) groups to get out of USENET rules on setting up groups; beyond that, any two or more sites that want a particular subject can start a hierarchy and create one or more news groups. It is only to the extent that traffic charges are very expensive that this scenario could happen. This assumes that there is no alternative available. As most areas have at least two or three competing regional connection services, this does not seem likely either. Scarcity and limiting only occur where there are resource shortages. That is (to the best of my knowledge) not present in Internet. > I think you will see moderated groups almost exclusively as > the century comes to an end. Again, a good idea? No, there > is room for almost everyone on this internet; but I don't > think the 'powers that be' in the next year or two or three > are going to see it that way. :( PAT] All that will happen is the same thing as BITNET (which is also being gatewayed as the 'bit.listserv' news hierarchy); if 'they' whoever that is, tries to reduce the number of 'news groups' then people will move their discussions to mailing lists, and thus INCREASE the amount of traffic over Internet, because now the messages will go twice; once to the hub site(s) and then back out to the list subscribers. If the regular channels are denied, alternate ones will spring up; the mail will go through. And mailing lists can be set up to mail out using the sender's address or the mailing list address; it may not be possible to tell which is mail and which is a mailing list, assuming a local site cares. Who are these 'powers that be'? The administrators of my news site -- Digital Express -- take all 3,000+ news groups except for the K12 groups due to legal questions about content exposed to minors; other than that, they take everything, as does UUNET and many other places. They could care less about the content; they deliver the messages to whoever wants to read them. And this is a commercial site intent on making money. Other commercial sites do the same thing; they take everything passed to them and let the customers decide what they want to read. And who is going to do all of this 'moderation'. The comp.os.vms group generates perhaps 50 messages a day and is mirrored by five different mail servers as INFO-VAX. Who exactly, unless they can make money from it, is going to moderate a high-volume news group? Can we expect to find hundreds of volunteer moderators willing to check every message? That's a little too much work for most people. I will make this promise: the day that I hear any announcement of a major change to Usenet such as large moderation, is the day I will spend money out of my own pocket to open a reflector echo and carry all 3,000+ news groups as mailing lists and carry everything anyone wants to take. And all messages will be sent to the newsgroups, plus being mailed out regardless of so-called moderation. Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM [Moderator's Note: Maybe what I should have said was as Internet becomes totally operated by large telecom companies we are going to see more and more restrictions on what the backbone sites will be willing to handle and pricing for connectivity will reach such high levels that a lot of sites -- maybe most or all -- will find it totally unaffordable to continue carrying all or even a large subset of the groups. I doubt anyone will come along and say 'this newsgroup is no longer in existence', but where there is no one willing to foot the cost of transporting the group, the group might as well not exist. I think you will find all sorts of rules and pronouncements coming down about newsgroups having to 'pay their own way', etc. I doubt that MCI is going to give a free ride to the talk and misc groups, to name one example. Of course anyone is free to make a phone call and pass a full newsfeed UUCP-style to anyone they want; but that is going to become old real fast when the phone bills start arriving, to say nothing of the delay in processing news. You can't move it very fast on a phone line at 9600 baud or even 14.4 for that matter. Sure there will be brave souls who volunteer to take 'all seventeen thousand news groups' (or whatever number it is up to at that point) and parcel out full feeds to whoever wants it, but the phone bills are going to be astronomical and MCI/ATT/Sprint's attitude will be fine, you'd rather pay us that way, go ahead ... but no more free rides or close to it. I think -- and this is just my opinion -- that as the transition to one hundred percent private ownership comes about the 'owners' are going to have dollar signs in their eyes where the moderated groups are concerned, because these they can control if they get control of the moderators -- not a hard task -- and to hell with the rest of the anarchists. Nothing will happen overnight, or even in a month's time. But watch and see if as the general public catches on to Usenet the unmoderated groups don't become noisier than ever, the traffic level reaches record highs -- you think it is high now? -- and the cost for connections to the Internet sky-rocket. More admins will pull the plug on more groups (unless the group finds its own way in via UUCP or similar) and the moderated groups will eventually be what is left. You really think MCI is going to be as generous with alt.whoever and misc.whatever as Uncle Sugar has been all these years? It is hard to pin down or quantify, but I have a gut-reaction that the moderators and their moderated groups are going to be among the few survivors of a shakedown and 'reform' the net will experience in the next few years. And *no one* is going to say 'you cannot have group X' or whatever ... it will just happen as people grow weary and tired of paying the bills. The private owners will cut deals with the moder- ators and their groups, etc. Watch and see, that's all I'm saying. PAT] ------------------------------ From: Erik E. Fair (Your Friendly Postmaster) Subject: Re: 100% Moderation of News Groups. NOT. Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 12:40:17 -0700 UUNET did not start the alt.* newsgroups. John Gilmore, with some help from his friends, did so. AlterNet is the IP network services arm of UUNET. I wuz dere. Erik E. Fair apple!fair fair@apple.com ------------------------------ From: Max (M.K.) Feil Subject: Interconnect Schematics (Shelf, Cabinet Documentation, etc.) Organization: Bell-Northern Research Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 15:00:00 EDT This is a query to those people creating schematics at the interconnect level, i.e. shelf, frame, system, etc. I am trying to find out what methods and tools are being used out there. My company designs large hardware systems for telecommunications. Some of these (especially switching equipment) may fill a whole room. The interconnect hierarchy is usually: printed circuit board -> shelf -> frame -> system. There are variations to this, especially in some of our products that use OEM equipment, but this hierarchy is a good example. To design hardware at levels above the printed circuit board level, we have found that graphical schematic capture just does not work. This is due to the large amount of connectivity (connector pins and cables). A typical shelf backpanel can easily have 10,000 pins. We have adopted a tabular approach which results in formatted tables to document the connectivity. This data can be used directly by the installer. It can also be passed automatically to downstream CAD tools to perform backpanel layout (using CBDS, our circuit board design system), or to downstream wiring/cabling and mechanical CAD programs. We do allow graphical diagrams in the interconnect schematic, but since they are not linked with the tabular connectivity they serve as comments only (block diagrams, clarification diagrams, etc). Assembly drawings and more detailed manufacturing (& mechanical) information are not meant to be part of the interconnect schematic, since after all it is just a schematic. We have been using a proprietary CAD tool for most of our interconnect schematics, however lately there has been a push to improve this tool and some designers have been using other methods, namely: 1) Speadsheets (which are well suited to tabular information). 2) Word processors & desktop publishing (which are totally free form and allow both tabular and graphical information, but are lacking when it comes to enforcing standards and automated data integration). 3) Graphical schematic capture (only possible sometimes). We were wondering what tools are being used in other companies that design large, hierarchical hardware systems. Are there commercially marketed tools out there designed specifically for interconnect schematics? We could not find any. Please reply to mkfeil@bnr.ca. You can also post, if you wish. Thanks for any info, Max Feil mkfeil@bnr.ca Bell-Northern Research CAD Software Development Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. ------------------------------ From: booloo@framsparc.ocf.llnl.gov (Mark Boolootian) Subject: World Record in Password Checking Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 12:18:01 -0700 (PDT) I thought readers might find this interesting: A NEW WORLD RECORD IN PASSWORD CHECKING HAS BEEN SET: Roch Bourbonnais, a Thinking Machines Corporation engineer, has ported and optimized the CM/2 port of the UFC-crypt to a CM/5 system. The UFC-crypt (Ultra Fast Crypt) implementation on the CM/2 Connection Machine (parallel computer) is a UNIX password checking routine (crypt()) ported by Michael Glad at UNI-C. The port, that is written in CM-fortran, utilizes the CM/5 vector units and is partly programmed in cdpeac (vector unit assembly language). The package achieves 1560 encryptions/second/vector unit. This scales to: 6,4 million encryptions per second on a large 1024 node machine. 800,000 - - - - - small 128 - - With this impressive performance, all combinations of six letters can be tried in less than an hour and all combinations of six lower-case letters can be tried in less than one minute. Congratulations, Jorgen Bo Madsen, Security Consultant UNI-C Lyngby, Danish Computing Centre for Research and Education DTH, Building 305, DK - 2800 Lyngby, Phone : +45-45-938355 Telefax: +45-45-930220 E-Mail : Jorgen.Bo.Madsen@uni-c.dk [Moderator's Note: Isn't this great! Now let's all install fifteen or sixteen character passwords including numbers, punctuation symbols and control characters in them and see how long it takes to crack into our accounts. :( The technology is impressive, but somehow I don't feel good about it. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 11:42 PDT From: dlr@daver.bungi.com (Dave Rand) Subject: Orange Card Woes While the Orange card has been a useful addition to my arsenel of calling cards, users need to be aware of certain restritions of the card. To make a long, detailed story short: *KNOW* that the area code you are using is a US area code, not a Canadian area code. Calls to Canada are "not supported", according to the (very hard to reach) customer service people. This is not true. Calls to Canada are supported, at slightly less than double the AT&T daytime calling card rate. There is no indication that the call made is not at the $0.25 rate of the Orange Card calls to US destinations. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 15:16 GMT From: Christopher Zguris <0004854540@mcimail.com> Subject: AT&T #206A2 Telephone Line Test Handsets I just got the latest ALL ELECTRONICS (800-826-5432) catalog and on page 62 they have AT&T telephone line test sets. The ad says they were designed to work with "craft access" computer system, but they also work as standard test sets. Price is $60, part# PTS-206. The ad has lots of info, so call them. I have nothing to do with ALL ELECTRONICS, but I am a satisfied customer. Christopher Zguris CZGURIS@MCIMail.com ------------------------------ From: itbkl@puknet.puk.ac.za (Keith Laaks) Subject: What is RASCOM and S.I.T.? Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 09:19:49 GMT Organization: ITB Department, University of Potchefstroom Does anybody know what the abbreviations RASCOM and S.I.T. mean? It may have something to do with new telco services, or vehicle tracking, but I am not sure. Thanks, KEITH Potch Univ. Email : Tel: Potchefstroom itbkl@puknet.puk.ac.za Voice (0148) 992126 West Transvaal South Africa ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 09:27:31 CDT From: walkerl@med.ge.com (Larry Walker) Subject: Telex <-> Internet Email? I'm trying to learn if anyone offers a (two-way) gateway between Telex and Internet Email. I have an application where it would be very useful for someone in a less Developed Country to send a telex, have it land in my email inbox, and have my reply return to the sender as a telex ... Anybody know of a way to set this up? Thanks in advance, Larry Walker System Architect email: walkerl@med.ge.com GE Medical Systems phone: 414.785.8262 P.O. Box 414 / NB-902 fax: 414.785.4331 Milwaukee, WI 53201 dialcomm: 8*322-8262 [Moderator's Note: Both MCI Mail and ATT Mail have telex gateways and both have Internet gateways. Trouble is, you can't send from Internet to Telex via either one: they want someone to pay, and collection is hard to deal with on our net. You could take a couple of accounts on one of those services, setting one account to forward incoming mail to !telex!number and setting the other to forward mail to !internet!name. You would write to one address from internet, the mail would forward to telex at your expense, and the recipient would telex to the other account and it would in turn forward to your net account. PAT] ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 09:35:12 PDT From: hwc@kalpana.com (Hon Wah Chin) Subject: Touch-Tone phones in Hong Kong Reply-To: hwc@kalpana.com Having been caught at Heathrow with a payphone whose keypad stopped working after making the connection, I'm planning ahead. Are phones with working tone pads readily available in Hong Kong or should I carry a tone generator? Hon Wah Chin ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 15:00:08 From: apollo@n2sun1.ccl.itri.org.tw (Yee-Lee Shyong) Subject: Category of Tones Used in CO Can anyone tell me what's the differences between Dial-tone, Busy-tone, Ringback-tone, and Reorder-tone ? Thanks! ------------------------------ From: R.Vasan@lambada.oit.unc.edu (R Vasan) Subject: Wanted: Caller-Id With Serial Interface to PC Date: 18 Aug 1993 18:16:14 GMT Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service Net.newbee posting here for a friend: He is looking for any device which could send Caller-Id info to RS232 or Centronics port. Could be a black-box or modem or tel.attachment. He did find a modem (14.4 V.dot everything) for $300 which did transfer to the RS232 port but he doesn't need that kind of speed or want to spend as much! Replies to: vasan@max.ee.lsu.edu R.Vasan@bbs.oit.unc.edu eric@lsuvm.sncc.lsu.edu Thanks in advance, R.M.S. Vasan [Moderator's Note: Having discussed this as much as we have in recent weeks perhaps respondents will email Mr. Vasan directly with their comments and suggestions, leaving me out of the loop. PAT] ------------------------------ From: dhansen@ua.d.umn.edu (Doreen Hansen) Subject: Kids Having Phun With Phones Date: 17 Aug 1993 23:57:22 -0500 Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth Someone just wrote about dialing "958" in NY (forgot which exchange) to get a readback of your number. I remember the days in area code (218) DUluth, MN when we as children would monkey with the phone and somehow discovered that dialing 41939211111 (I think this is right; I do recall lots of ones at the end) -- would produce a an extremely LOUD female voice almost YELLING your own number back at you. Was rather hilarious to us. We also discovered that dialing 410-3911 made the phone ring. After dialing that, the line sounded quiet. You had to hang up in about two to four seconds ... wait too long, and it would not ring back. Dialing 410-3912 made it ring with long and short bursts, and 410-3955 made it ring with a bunch of tiny bursts, etc. (There was a bunch of possibilites!!!) What fun! We had a two-party line, I wonder if this is why all these existed. Any insight, you phone-authorities? Boy did we have fun with that 410-3955 number! We would make it ring, watch mother run to the phone and holler "hello hello? hello? " into the dead line, and listen to her b*tch about how crappy the phone company is, and how they should fix the line. I never YET told her it was me. heh heh ... Oh! There was yet another goofy thing to do. 419 _ _ _ _ (forgot) would create a dead-sounding line, then if you hung up, people calling in would hear a ring, but our phone would not ring. This would last for DAYS if we never picked ours up to call out. When picking it up, the line would be dead, and it took lots of clicking up & down the swwitchhook to get a dialtone. (Which BTW, was an awful, raspy BUZZZZZZZZ in Duluth 15-20 yrs ago.) I can still remember it! Again, my mom and dad thought our phone was shot, when indeed it was me and my antics. I'm just curious! Oh well ... doreen Duluth,MN ------------------------------ From: gmerin@panix.com (Gary Merinstein) Subject: Re: New Jersey Pulls the Plug on Computer-Dialed Calls Date: 18 Aug 1993 00:08:00 -0400 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC In dave@westmark.com (Dave Levenson) writes: > In article , gmerin@panix.com (Gary > Merinstein) writes: >> Thank God! I was sooo tired of getting those endless calls to sell me >> a mausoleum plot ... > You'll still get those calls. The law only applies to calls > originated from telephones in New Jersey. The Garden State is not in > any position to legislate calls placed to New Jersey telephones from > out of state. I spent the last 20 years in NJ and often I would come home from work to find my answering machine filled with a computer sales message (that couldn't tell it wasn't talking to a human) pitching me a mausoleum plot. The vendor was a sales agency in a town 25 miles away. > But I agree -- it's a step in the right direction. Its a small victory -- now its up to the feds to continue the trend for interstate calls. gmerin@panix.com mci: 489-6979 ci$ 74035,1232 ------------------------------ From: trebor@foretune.co.jp (Robert J Woodhead) Subject: Re: UUNet 900 Seems to be a Bad Idea Organization: Foretune Co., Ltd. Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 04:51:09 GMT Bob_Frankston@frankston.com writes: > As part of my advocacy of 900 alternatives, the UUNet 900 service does > present an interesting challenge for those wanting to use a credit > card instead of a 900 number. Since the login is accomplished via a > UUCP connection script, it seems feasible for UUnet to accept a credit > card number as part of the connection sequence. I think this would be ill-advised. You'd have people using stolen credit card numbers dialing in from AT&T Payphone 2000's around the country. Registering a credit card number as billing for an account is fine, but electronically soliciting one on a call by call basis is asking for trouble. For all it's drawbacks, 900 avoids this problem. A better solution is a callback system whereby a registered machine calls in on an 800 number and basically says "call me," then UUNET would call back over WATS. Cheapest overall. Robert J. Woodhead, Biar Games / AnimEigo, Incs. trebor@forEtune.co.jp AnimEigo US Office Email (for general questions): 72447.37@compuserve.com ------------------------------ Subject: Re: UUNet 900 Seems to be a Bad Idea From: roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 00:07:31 CST Organization: The Villa CyberSpace, executive headquarters In comp.dcom.telecom, Bob_Frankston@frankston.com writes: > Of course, some callers might not have credit cards, but then they > shouldn't qualify for credit via 900 either. Excuse me?!?!? I don't hold any credit cards, primarily because I remember my parents' problems with plastic money. However, USWest has never had to send me a second notice about a bill. If i chose to call a 900 number, rest assured that I would pay the toll charge on time. Has the world descended so far that those few of us who still choose to pay cash for our obligations have become third-class citizens? Yes, I'm insulted! Roy M. Silvernail |+| roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org ------------------------------ From: Charles_Frankston@frankston.com Subject: Re: FCC Equal Access Order Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 00:53 -0400 > ... Finally, by prohibiting aggregators from imposing surcharges on > access code calls that are not charged for calls using the presub- > scribed OSPs, In simpler terms, this means that if you charge $.75 to access the pre-subscribed long distance carrier, you can't charge $1.00 to access another carrier. R. Kevin Oberman pointed out that you can't always tell from your hotel bill what the access charge was, as opposed to the long distance charge. That may be true from an individual customer's point of view, but nonetheless there obviously is one programmed into the equipment, and it presumably wouldn't be difficult to verify compliance to the FCC regulation in the course of an audit. I've actually found that many hotels state something like "long distance calls will be charged at AT&T's operator-assisted rate" (i.e. direct dial long distance calls). I'm not sure what this usually is, but I'll bet its $.75 or more. ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #588 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa23228; 19 Aug 93 1:29 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA24851 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Wed, 18 Aug 1993 22:48:56 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA15632 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Wed, 18 Aug 1993 22:48:15 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 22:48:15 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308190348.AA15632@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #589 TELECOM Digest Wed, 18 Aug 93 22:48:00 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 589 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal (Harold Hallikainen) Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal (David Breneman) Re: AT&T Language Line Choices (Don McKillican) Re: AT&T Language Line Choices (Will Martin) Re: Questions About Regular Old 'Snail Mail' (Alan T. Furman) Re: Questions About Regular Old 'Snail Mail' (Carl Moore) Re: 10xxx NOT Allowed on 1-800 (John Slater) Re: 10xxx NOT Allowed on 1-800 (Paul Robinson) 10XXX Restrictions - Legality (Atri Indiresan) Re: TrueVoice (tm) - The True Story (Michael K. Minakami) Re: AT&T Truvoice Demo (David G. Lewis) Re: Leftover Drops (Carl Oppedahl) Re: Leftover Drops (Alan Boritz) Re: Radio Station Acronyms (Stewart Clamen) Re: Radio Station Acronyms (Jim Cobban) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: hhallika@tuba.calpoly.edu (Harold Hallikainen) Subject: Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 19:24:23 GMT > [Moderator's Note: Well, you know the only reason we hear a ringing > signal from the other end is so that people will be assured their call > is being processed rather than ignored. The ring we hear in our ear > has nothing to do with the ring being given on the other end via the > phone bell; but if telco did not provide a ringing signal back to the > caller, many people would think that the phone was out of order. That > is the truth, seriously. No reason at all to provide a 'ringing sig- > nal to the caller which has no relationship to the signal given the > called party other than to placate or humor the caller. PAT] Although, in step exchanges, wasn't the ringing signal actually some of the called party ringing sent back to the calling party? Seemed like it was 20 Hz with some higher frequency mixed in. I recall hearing a difference in ringing signal based on the ringing load on the line. If the number we were calling had a neon lamp instead of a ringer (such as a radio station in studio line), we'd hear a bit of raspiness due to the sudden conduction as the ringing voltage hit the ionization voltage for the lamp. Do I remember all this correctly? Is the current ringing signal just mimicking the old step ringing signal? I do think the ringing signal does offer a valuable means of "call progress" signalling. A small number of calls I place get "lost". Having the ringing tone is an indication that my call did not get lost. I HOPE that the ringing signal does at least indicate that ring voltage is being sent to the distant subscriber! Harold Hallikainen ap621@Cleveland.Freenet.edu Hallikainen & Friends, Inc. hhallika@oboe.calpoly.edu 141 Suburban Road, Bldg E4 phone 805 541 0200 fax 544 6715 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-7590 telex 4932775 HFI UI ------------------------------ From: daveb%jaws@dsinet.dgtl.com (David Breneman) Subject: Re: Psychological Effect of "Busy" Signal Date: 18 Aug 93 19:33:23 GMT Organization: Digital Systems International, Redmond WA Missouri 4-H Youth Development Programs (EXTMO4H@mizzou1.missouri.edu) wrote: > Can anyone confirm that in some of the old CO, the ringing signal was > actually the 20 Hz ringing current? I was always interested in the > different ringing signal sounds that have been used in different COs. I can't confirm it, but that was my impression, too. I remember the "ringing signal" sounded like a low-frequency electrical current. Dial tones were more, I don't know, "mechanical" sounding, too. David Breneman Email: daveb@jaws.engineering.dgtl.com System Administrator, Software Engineering Services Digital Systems International, Inc. Voice: 206 881-7544 Fax: 206 556-8033 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 09:38:02 EDT From: dmckilli@cmoc1b.qc.bell.ca (Don McKillican) Subject: Re: AT&T Language Line Choices I notice that the Great List of Languages also includes Dakota, Lakota, Nakota and Sioux. I thought that the first three were exactly the three main branches of the Sioux language. Sounds to me like offering German, PLUS Hochdeutsch, Plattdeutsch, Oestereichisch and Schweizerdeutsch (High German, Low German, Austrian and Swiss German, respectively). Indeed it wouldn't surprise me to find that the Sioux dialects are a lot closer than Low German is to Swiss ... Regards, Don McKillican Internet: dmckilli@QC.Bell.CA Consultant -- Software Solutions Envoy: [id=DMCKILLI]Bell Bell Sygma, Montreal Tel: (514) 870-7611 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 9:03:39 CDT From: Will Martin Subject: Re: AT&T Language Line Choices Peter M. Weiss wrote: > Will Martin says: >> would really like AT&T to PROVE that they can provide access to *any* >> of their advertised listed languages in a short timeframe, suitable >> for emergency use. (...) > I would be careful of using a service for emergency use that was NOT > designed for same. I wonder if AT&T is marketing it for that kind? > (I doubt it.) Sorry, but that is EXACTLY what AT&T is doing. That's where I first saw info about it, and that's how I got the brochure -- they advertise Language Line in law-enforcement/police publications specifically as a service that can be tied into 911 and permit dispatchers to converse with non-English-speaking callers, in emergency situations. And I still maintain it isn't up to the task. I'd like to see some AT&T people jump in on this, perhaps with the results of studies or tests that disprove my contention. If it really DOES work, I'd be happy to be refuted. But so far all I've ever seen has been advertising making unsupported claims as to its effectiveness. (A suggestion -- check to see if your local Police Academy or department has a library; if it does, it should be public-access, since your tax dollars pay for it. [The St. Louis Police Academy downtown on Tucker has one, which is where I see these kinds of periodicals.] You can see for yourself the ads for Language Line, CD-ROM-based on-line criss-cross directories [usually marketed by Nynex], cell-phone-call intercept devices, etc., among the firearms, uniforms, and nightstick ads ...) Will ------------------------------ From: atfurman@cup.portal.com Subject: Re: Questions About Regular Old 'Snail Mail' Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 02:40:56 PDT Peter Rukavina writes: > (4) Addresses in the United Kingdom don't seem to have street numbers > associated with them as we tend to have here in Canada. An example: > 'Hayle Mill, Maidstone, Kent, England.' I once saw a British address (it was a lab or factory belonging to to EMI Ltd.) that lingers in my mind to this day: "Wookie Hole" Alan T. Furman atfurman@cup.portal.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 11:27:00 EDT From: Carl Moore Subject: Re: Questions About Regular Old 'Snail Mail' I did write long ago about use of telephone prefixes to help out in lessons regarding geography. In ascending order of precision, I listed the following items for the U.S. (don't know the comparable listings for other countries): telephone area code; first three digits of zip code; telephone prefix (the next three digits after the area code); five-digit zip code; nine-digit zip code (five-digit zip code plus four-digit extension). (But near Wilmington, Delaware, I think the area served by 302-475 is a subset of zipcode 19810.) To answer some of your questions: For the UK: It wouldn't hurt to use UK in addition to England. Sometimes, a little redundancy in an address is useful (not just for the UK), so if one part gets messed up for any reason, the address might still be made out from the rest of it. I do think that the UK has an overall postal-code system, so you should be able to get away with using UK in place of England. For Germany: The former East and West Germany each had four-digit postal codes (like 8000 Munich, which you sent, in the former West Germany). After unification, they continued to be used for a while, with the German for "east" or "west" prefixed in front. Now, I understand there is a new five-digit scheme for unified Germany. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 93 11:04:37 BST From: John.Slater@UK.Sun.COM (John Slater) Subject: Re: 10xxx NOT Allowed on 1-800 > [Moderator's Note: Most exchanges in Chicago will not allow it > either. If you do it, your call is bounced. You must dial without > 10xxx. PAT] It makes sense when you think about it. The caller isn't paying for the call, so he/she doesn't get a choice. The called party is paying: they get to choose the 800 service provide, and hence the LD carrier. John Slater ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 13:05:58 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM Subject: Re: 10xxx NOT Allowed on 1-800 From: Paul Robinson Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA Al Varney , writes: > In article 0005066432@MCIMAIL.COM > writes: >> In short, despite the fact that 10xxx codes are irrelevant for 1-800 >> numbers, you cannot dial a 10xxx code ahead of a 1-800 number > Bellcore believes that permitting the dialing of "10XXX" on calls > where "10XXX" is irrelevant is misleading to the caller, ... > [however, calls to "911"] should.. ignore the 10XXX -- the > "emergency" overides the "confusion about carrier selection". > If you believe Bellcore is incorrect in it's requirements, you can > write to them or ... C&P/Bell Atlantic. But it had better be a > really GOOD reason -- not just your irritation at mis-dialing. I wasn't "complaining" per se; I was pointing out a fact that (1) had to the best of my knowledge never been reported on TELECOM Digest; (2) that since I had never tried it, did not know about it; (3) since I had heard about the fact that 1-800 numbers are routed according to the IXC that the subscriber uses, 10xxx codes are irrelevant; and (4) [which I was aware of] calls to 10xxx 911 *will* go through. I wasn't complaining about being unable to dial a 1-800 number with a 10xxx code; I was simply stating that I was suprised to discover that I could not do so. Note that some of our California correspondents have pointed out that Pacific Bell will, if I'm not mistaken, routinely ignore 10xxx codes on calls which are Intra-LATA, and put the call through at the much higher rates that PacHell is able to "burn" you for. :) Paul Robinson - TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM ------------------------------ From: atri@eecs.umich.edu (Atri Indiresan) Subject: 10XXX Restrictions - Legality Date: 18 Aug 93 18:24:26 Organization: University of Michigan This is an update on my debate with the U. of Michigan Telecom regarding the legality of 10XXX blocking. First of all, I'd like to thank all those who provided me with information regarding FCC regulations. The TELECOM Digest is a wonderful resource! The news is less than encouraging, and it looks like aggregators have the right to place such restrictions. The FCC ruling on aggregators (CC Docket No. 91-35 "Policies and Rules Covering Operator Service Access and Pay Telephone Compensation") does define "equal access" as 10XXX access. However, it goes on to say: --- The term "operator services" refers to "any interstate telecommunications services initiated from an aggregator location that includes, as a component, any automatic or live assistance to a customer to arrange for billing or completion, or both, of an interstate telephone call through a method other than (A) automatic completion with billing to the telephone from which the call originated; or (B) completion through an access code used by the consumer, with billing to an account previously established with the carrier by the consumer" --- UMTEL provides 10XXX 0 access, which allows us to reach an operator of our choice. It does not allow 10XXX 1 access, which would allow direct billing to my home phone number and setting up an account as in the case of a calling plan. The clauses (A) and (B) seem to let aggregators off the hook for such services. Of course, 10XXX 0 calls are billed at operator assisted rates, as opposed to 10XXX 1 which gives us residential direct dial rates. UMTEL told me, "There are enormous difficulties involved with 10XXX 1 calls with regard to billing that precluded any involvement at this time." My understanding is that this would involve a software upgrade that would have to send source number information to the long distance carrier so that billing would proceed automatically. My questions: 1. Is this really so hard/expensive? Considering that the switch supports 10XXX 0 calls, would it be that hard to support 10XXX 1 calls? Is this a technical problem, or just a business decision? 2. Since UMTEL provides telephone service to private residences (in addition to offices and dorms -- university family housing has separate units with private phones), would they be regulated by any other FCC regulations besides those regulating aggregators? With the current information I have, it seems to me that I have no legal standing to complain, and the most I can do is make a loud noise and hope public pressure make UMTEL see the light. Until then, at a personal level, I will do my best to avoid using UMTEL. I will use Telepassport (I don't think it was realy meant for residential use, but it is much cheaper than what UMTEL offers, but still more expensive than calling plans from major carriers). Atri [Moderator's Note: Telepassport is mainly for businesses and other people who make international calls to the extent of at least $25 per month which is the point where savings start to kick in. Rates from other countries to the USA are typically 30-40 percent less than the local PTT charges. The trade off is waiting for a callback with USA dial tone. PAT] ------------------------------ From: minakami@xenon.stanford.edu (Michael K. Minakami) Subject: Re: TrueVoice (tm) - The True Story Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University. Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 06:58:51 GMT In article dcg5662@hertz.njit.edu (Dave Grabowski) writes: > Apparently, signals below 300Hz roll off sharply, at approximately > 12dB per octave. > We are shown a new frequency response curve, which raises signals > from 100-300Hz by 10-15dB. An "illustrative embodiment of the > invention" was put together with a Yamaha DEQ7 digital equalizer. Doesn't the GSM 6.3 RPE/LTP specification call for a pre-compensation filter in this range? At least one implementation I saw "pre-compensated" for the bass attentuation by boosting those frequencies. Michael Minakami Computer Science/Psychology Stanford University ------------------------------ From: deej@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (david.g.lewis) Subject: Re: AT&T Truvoice Demo Organization: AT&T Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 14:26:56 GMT In article rudholm@aimla.com (Mark Rudholm) writes: > But wait a second, isn't demonstrating Truvoice over an ostensibly > non-truvoice line (they haven't installed it yet) like demonstrating > HDTV via a regular NTSC broadcast? No. There is no such thing as a "TrueVoice line" or a "Non-TrueVoice line". The enhancement is applied to the voice signal in the network. This enhanced signal then propagates to the listener, wherever he or she may be, whatever types of trunks or lines the signal is carried over. > Makes you wonder if anyone in marketing anywhere understands simple > logic. Makes you wonder if anyone on the net anywhere understands the technology they post derogatory messages about. David G Lewis AT&T Bell Laboratories david.g.lewis@att.com or !att!goofy!deej Switching & ISDN Implementation ------------------------------ From: oppedahl@panix.com (Carl Oppedahl) Subject: Re: Leftover Drops Date: 18 Aug 1993 02:12:57 -0400 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC In a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (Arthur Rubin) writes: > In oppedahl@panix.com (Carl Oppedahl) > writes: >> This means that if you are a tenant in a building in one of those states, >> you are at the mercy of the landlord for the wire that goes from the >> point of entry to your space. A jerk landlord will say that the only >> way an extra line can be run from the POE to your space is for telco >> to do it (at telco hourly rates, of course, since from telco's point >> of view that is customer wire (inside wire). And the jerk landlord >> will refuse to maintain that wire, leaving you to have to pay for >> inside wire maintenance as your only way of being sure that wire will >> be maintained without unexpected expense to you. > That last is now false, and may have been false for a while. For > quite a while, landlords have been responsible for maintaining, at the > landlords' expense, wires inside a tenant's apartment. (It should be > noted that this does give a landlord a reasonable excuse not to allow > a tenant to install an additional (or any) phone lines.) A recent PUC > requires building owners to maintain wiring between the demarc and the > "apartment demarc", to use an intentionally incorrect phrase. Er, I think your statement is specific to some particular state, is it not? I don't think this is true across all states. BTW, which state are you telling us about? I guess what you are telling us is that the PUC in some particular state has put the maintenance burden on the landlord. This is not as odd as it sounds. Most landlords, no matter how jerky, would probably feel they had to maintain the water pipes and sewer pipes between your apartment and the basement ... so why should phone lines be any different? Nonetheless, I believe that some "renter-beware" states have failed thus far to put a duty on the landlord to maintain wires from basement to apartment. Carl Oppedahl AA2KW (patent lawyer) 1992 Commerce Street #309 Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-4412 voice 212-777-1330 ------------------------------ Date: 18 Aug 93 07:59:29 EDT From: Alan Boritz <72446.461@CompuServe.COM> Subject: Re: Leftover Drops Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org (Leonard Erickson) writes: > In V13 # 562, Alan Boritz is rather positive that the demarc is inside > the tenant's space. I seriously doubt that this is correct, unless it > is some odd law in his state. Absolutely positive, and I helped make the policy on that issue for the world's second largest building. > For example, according to this, I have *three* demarcs in my apartment. > That's how many jacks I have. That's not how a demarc works. A demarc is a point of demarcation for the purpose of determining where the service-provider's responsibil- ities end and yours begin. If the jacks are stringed together from one feed, the FIRST one is your demarc (for telco purposes). If they are all in parallel, running from the underground or MDF, you may actually have three, however telco may concede that the closest one to telco's backbone facilities is the real demarc and may abandon the other drops in the event they no longer work. > My inquiries have resulted in the information that the demarc is that > box in the laundry room, and that the landlord is responsible for the > wiring unless *I* subscribe to the wire backup plan (and this is not > just from people who want to sell me the plan. If the landlord allowed you to install a demarc in a common area of the building, then all you have is access to the demarc. Anything added by a tenant, for a tenant's convenience, is the TENANT's responsibility. However, if a landlord allows himself to be bullied into perform free services he probably deserves all the aggravation he can get. ;) > So I am curious as to what Mr. Boritz's *source* for his statements is? Informal discussions with FCC Common Carrier Bureau staff, a good reading of FCC dockets on detariff'ing of inside wire, reading, and reviewing, thousands of leases (quite a few dealing with complex telecom issues spanning at least 60 years), fairly good knowledge of the law of contracts, and quite a lot of common sense. However, since you also seem to be sure that your landlord has somehow been saddled with providing your wire maintenance service, can you quote specific provisions in your lease that would be enforceable in a court of law? Can you be as certain that your landlord would not (after providing you that service) impose a wire maintenance fee IN ADDITION to your regular rent? Alan Boritz 72446.461@compuserve.com ------------------------------ From: clamen+@CS.CMU.EDU (Stewart Clamen) Subject: Re: Radio Station Acronyms Reply-To: clamen+@CS.CMU.EDU Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 08:21:23 GMT In article doheare@jetform.com (Dave O'Heare) writes: > In Canada, there have been a few. CFRB stood for "Canada's First Radio > -- Batteryless", to indicate the modern (!) technology being used. The old CFCF AM-600 in Montreal (now CIQC, with the formerly-affiliated television station retaining the call letters) apparently stood for "Canada's First, Canada's First". CFCF-600 was Canada's first commer- cial radio station. Stewart M. Clamen Internet: clamen@cs.cmu.edu School of Computer Science UUCP: uunet!"clamen@cs.cmu.edu" Carnegie Mellon University Phone: +1 412 268 2145 5000 Forbes Avenue Fax: +1 412 681 5739 Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3891, USA ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 10:06:00 +0000 From: Jim Cobban Subject: Re: Radio Station Acronyms In Article 36257 Dave O'Heare writes: > In Canada, there have been a few. CFRB stood for "Canada's First Radio > -- Batteryless", to indicate the modern (!) technology being used. CFRB stands for Free Rogers' Batteryless. The C is just the prefix code for Canada. Rogers refers to Ted Rogers Sr. an early radio pioneer who invented the first AC powered radio receiver. He named the radio station which he established to promote the radio receivers. Rogers also was the first engineer to build a radio which was small enough to put in a car. His son is the founder of Rogers Cablevision which is one of the largest, if not the largest, operator of CATV systems in North America. Rogers Cablevision is half owner of Unitel, the largest independent long distance carrier in Canada. [Moderator's Note: And in their corporate holdings several years ago was also the Rogers Telephone Answering Service here in Chicago. I think they have an entity here now also called Rogers Radio Paging. PAT] ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V13 #589 ******************************   Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa23378; 19 Aug 93 1:34 EDT Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA09212 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist-outbound); Wed, 18 Aug 1993 23:10:20 -0500 Received: by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id AA23201 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for telecomlist); Wed, 18 Aug 1993 23:09:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 23:09:40 -0500 From: TELECOM Moderator Message-Id: <199308190409.AA23201@delta.eecs.nwu.edu> To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Subject: TELECOM Digest V13 #590 TELECOM Digest Wed, 18 Aug 93 23:09:30 CDT Volume 13 : Issue 590 Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson Re: Foreign Exchange Service (Jack Decker) Re: Foreign Exchange Service (William J. Earl) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: ao944@yfn.ysu.edu (Jack Decker) Subject: Re: Foreign Exchange Service Date: 18 Aug 1993 18:32:20 GMT Organization: Youngstown State/Youngstown Free-Net Warning: This message is LONG. I apologize in advance, but hope it contains enough useful suggestions to make up for the length. On Tue Aug 17 21:02:06 1993, kravitz@foxtail.com (Jody Kravitz) wrote: > I've been trying to find ways of reducing the phone costs for my > wife's business and have been getting the runaround from Pacific Bell. > My wife is a veterinarian and runs a mobile clinic from a specially > converted motor home. Most of her clients are from an a nearby > mountain community. That community has a #5ESS which is slaved off > the #5ESS switch in our home town. > Despite the proximity of the mountain town, incoming and outgoing > calls are expensive. The cost of a daytime call to (or from) the town > is $0.10 * (minutes+1). We had about $80.00 in calls to there last > month and the volume is increasing. Oddly, calls to (or from) another > (smaller) town in the same general direction, but further away, are > free. First, a general comment ... you have run into a problem that cries out for resolution in many areas of the country. Without going into a long diatribe, local calling areas in many part of the country are laid out in somewhat arbitrary and discriminatory patterns ... patterns that may have made perfect sense 40 or 50 years ago, but no longer do. I could write paragraphs about this but for now I will just say that one common example is that folks living in major metropolitan areas can often call anywhere within a 25-50 mile radius (it varies by area), while folks living in rural areas of the same state may be lucky if they can call into the nearest town without incurring a toll charge. My opinion has always been that it would be much fairer to give everyone local calls within a certain radius (say 20-30 miles, like the folks in the big cities get [Chicago excepted, of course]), no matter where they live within a state. One of the strengths that competitive local dialtone providers will have is that they won't have to follow the exchange boundaries of existing telcos. But, I digress ... > Since she has no "office", we terminated her business phone line in > our residence. That has worked well, but in order to appear more > "permanent" to her customers in the neighboring town, we recently > installed a "vanity" number (xxx-0500) in that town with remote call > forwarding to our regular business number. This saves the caller the > cost of calling our "old" business number, but in addition to the cost > of the service, each forwarded call costs us $0.10 * (minutes+1). Yup. Now let me first ask this. Have you checked the local calling areas to see if there is another exchange that is a "free" call from both the exchange in which the RCF number is installed, and your residence? If so, you could set up the Remote Call Forwarding in THAT exchange, your customers in the neighboring town could still call you for free, and you'd lose the per-minute charge. I'm assuming you've checked out this possibility already, but on the other hand, I'm amazed at how many people don't ... they just don't think about going through a third exchange (the shortest distance between two points may be a straight line, but in telephony that's NOT necessarily the least expensive route!). > I recently discovered that one of my neighbors has "foreign exchange > service" in their residence. This seemed like it might be a good > idea, so I placed several calls to Pacific Bell's residence and > business service offices. My first conversation was with a residence > service rep who seemed informed and helpful. My second call was to a > business rep who seemed to want to keep me uninformed. She left me so > angry I felt I was talking to Ernestine the operator in a Lily Tomlim > skit. I hate to sound like a broken record, but people should never, ever deal with "business office" personnel if you have a need that's the least bit unusual. The minute you realize that the person you're talking to either doesn't have a clue, or is being evasive, you need to ask to talk to a supervisor (and the supervisor's supervisor if necessary). The goal of the lowest level folks is often to answer your question (note I did NOT say "CORRECTLY answer your question) and get you off the line as quickly as possible. If you're REALLY getting the runaround, you might try saying to the supervisor that if you can't get a straight answer from the telco, you'll try forwarding your question via the Public Utilities Commission and see if THEY can get a straight answer, and request the supervisor's name so that you can put it in your letter in order to show that you did try to get the information through regular channels first. If you say something like that, the supervisor will generally kick you up to someone who can help you post haste ... but if not, a written request sent via the PUC will often get you ACCURATE information like nothing else will! Now, the sad fact is that in many areas untimed Foreign Exchange (FX) service is available only on a "grandfathered" basis ... that is, it's available only to existing customers, and then only as long as they remain at their current location. If they move, they lose it, or have to get the newer FX offering that charges a per-minute rate on both incoming and outgoing calls. There ARE ways around this, but you have to be pretty telecom-savvy and do a lot of digging. The first thing I'd check for is any intra-LATA toll calling plans that the telephone company doesn't want you to know about. The PUC may be able to help you find these, if they exist. For example, in Michigan, there is the Adjacent Exchange Toll Calling Plan (AETCP) that (for residential users only) provides UNLIMITED calling to all adjacent toll exchanges (those in your LATA only) for $15.00 per month. Since Michigan allows the unlimited option for residential lines only, it wouldn't help you much, but then you aren't in Michigan anyway. :-) My point, though, is that it's like pulling teeth to get many Michigan telcos to even tell you that the AETCP exists, and even if they do, they'll try to sell you on "Circle Calling" or some other MEASURED option instead. So you want to look for intra-LATA optional calling plans that are tariffed, but not widely advertised or promoted by the telcos. Failing that, let's go back to that FX line. Think about what it really is. It has (at least) two components: Provision of local dial tone (essentially a regular POTS line that could be terminated in the same exchange, if you had an office there, but isn't) and the line that extends your POTS line to another exchange (including any repeaters, amplifiers, etc.). If you let telco handle both components of this in a "bundled" offering (which is essentially what FX is), then they can hook up their meter (so to speak) and charge on a per-call basis. But now suppose that you order each component separately and YOU tie them together (preferably without telling telco, although as long as you're ordering tariffed services and not using them illegally, they really can't say much even if they find out). To give you an example: Suppose your wife works out a deal with one of her customers in the neighboring town ... preferably one that owns contiguous property that crosses the exchange boundary, if such exists. She gives the guy free annual immunizations for his horses or something like that, and he allows her to put some phone equipment in his basement (or even a dry part of his barn), and maybe erect a SMALL structure (a storage shed would probably do) on the other side of the property. If the property straddles an exchange boundary, you order a POTS line on each side of the boundary, (one terminating at the house and the other in the storage shed which would of course be on the other side of the boundary), and then you run a hunk of underground cable between the two, and use a WATS-extender type device (or even a simple two-line call forwarding device, if all you care about is incoming calls) to forward calls from one line to the other. If you can't get access to property straddling the exchange boundary (or if tariffs absolutely forbid having service from two different telcos on the same property, even if the property does straddle the boundary and even if the service would be in separate buildings), then your goal would be to get an UNmeasured line between your remote location (where your POTS line terminates in the adjacent town) and your office. There are several offerings that might be available: 1) A "dry" metallic pair, sometimes referred to as an "intercom" or "audio" circuit. You do NOT need a "conditioned" pair such as used for broadcast applications, but depending on the tariffs, that may be the only type of metallic circuit available. This would work only if the combined distance of your "dry" pair PLUS the loop serving your POTS line isn't too long to allow reliable operation (if is is, as I think it might be in your particular case, you might still be able to do it if you insert a "long loop extender" device into the loop). In this case, you'd simply cross-connect your POTS line to your metallic pair, stick a phone at the office, and keep your mouth shut about what you did! 2) An "Off-Premises Extension" (OPX) line. Strangely enough, in some areas you can get what is essentially an unmeasured FX line IF you also have a "real" phone in the serving exchange. In this case, the "real" phone is considered the primary line, and the line coming into your office would be considered an "Off-Premises Extension" of the first line. So, assuming you had a POTS line put into your customer's home in the neighboring exchange as suggested above, you would tell telco that you have opened an "office" in your customer's basement, and need an "Off-Premises Extension" of the phone line there that terminates in your real office (your home in this case). This is actually similar to what you'd be doing in number 1) above, except that telco would be more responsible for maintaining the quality of the line (also, the mileage charges MAY be different because in one case they'd be calculated from your customer's home to your office, while in the other case they'd probably be calculated from the telephone exchange building to your office). 3). A PBX Off-Premises Extension. Some telcos have gotten wise to the fact that a regular OPX line can be used as an FX line, so they have filed tariffs that say that even if there IS a phone in the serving exchange, if the OPX is in a distant exchange the ALL calls on the line (no matter which extension they originate from/are answered by) must be billed on a per-minute basis, similar to FX lines. This is a hard sell to the PUC's (since the phone located in the serving exchange might indeed be the primary business location), so tariffs differ from state to state. But there is another type of Off-Premises Extension, and that is an extension hanging off of a PBX. In this case telco gives you what is essentially the equivalent of a bare pair of wires and you are expected to connect one end to a PBX (which supplies dialtone) and the other end to a telephone instrument. Of course, if the PBX allows you to dial "9" and access an outside trunk at the remote location, and if the PBX just happens to be set to "night answer" and all incoming calls ring directly through to your extension ... well, you can see the problem telco would have determining if there were really a PBX hanging out there. Some folks do this and actually put a small PBX (one of the small Panasonic units or some such) out there ... there is no law that says you have to have more than one POTS business line coming into your PBX! But I've also heard of folks putting something like a dialer unit there (programming it to "eat" a leading "9" digit, so if a telco tech ever checks the line, sure enough, he'll have to dial a "9" to get an outside line) or just connecting the end that's supposed to be connected to the PBX right to a POTS line. The latter is probably a violation of telco tariffs, though. But a small PBX is c