Date: Fri, 09 Dec 94 10:35:39 EST Errors-To: Comp-privacy Error Handler From: Computer Privacy Digest Moderator To: Comp-privacy@uwm.edu Subject: Computer Privacy Digest V5#071 Computer Privacy Digest Fri, 09 Dec 94 Volume 5 : Issue: 071 Today's Topics: Moderator: Leonard P. Levine DMV Records DMV Records (NYS) Re: DMV Records (NYS) Re: DC Metro Smart Cards WWW Profile Registry Re: 3 hits and you're out? (SSN use) Re: Dynamic Negotiation in the Privacy Wars Caller ID and Blocking Caller ID and Blocking Caller ID and Blocking Info on CPD, (unchanged since 11/28/94) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: vin@shore.net (Vin McLellan) Date: 06 Dec 1994 14:12:17 -0500 Subject: DMV Records There have been questions about agencies and services which offer access to computerized directories of DMV records. I recently stumbled across a posting from and subsequently contacted his firm, the American Information Network,Inc. At twenty bucks a search, a friend recently spent $60 with AIN to locate what she hopes is her long-lost father: a vagabond of sorts, a guy with a common first and last name, who apparently used a phony SS numbers -- in all, a difficult search. The success of the venture is, as yet, unconfirmed -- but the ANI staff seemed helpful and professional. The scope and depth of their compilation of public records, if as claimed, is quite impressive. Almost unbelievably so. (I remain doubtful of any claim to be able to access "criminal records" from all 50 states, but I didn't press the issue.) Talking briefly with AIN staff, however, I had the impression that many small commercial ventures may be jumping into this business of remarketing public records, with the rapidly decreasing cost of of obtaining the data and the storing it. (CDs?) Although AIN pitches "interactive service," it means direct access to their BBS, rather than Internet access. _Vin McLellan >From ANI's "info" file: ##### ### ### ### The American Information Network Inc. ###### ### #### ### ### ## ### ######## "We put the Public back in Public Records" ######## ### ### #### ### ### ### ### ### 216/456-7771 Modem or 216/499-1140 Voice We offer the following: o Criminal Records in ALL 50 States o Driving Records in ALL 50 States - Interactive Service - o Credit Records in ALL 50 States - Interactive Service - o License Plate searches in 49 States o Motor Vehicle Reports in ALL 50 States o Property Records in ALL 50 States o National Social Security Locators - Interactive Service - o National Address Locators o Name Scans by City or State or Nationwide - Interactive Service - o National Social Security Death Index o National Phone Number Identifier - Interactive Service - o National Workers Compensation Records o Nationwide Business Credit Reports o Statewide Corporate Records in ALL 50 States o Worldwide Business Background Reports o Business Background reports for ALL 50 States o Plus Many more reports available Online. As the above list suggests, we have a wide range of services to offer the professional and/or the casual user. Give our Online System a call for more information on the above listings. We also provide " Interactive Service ". This means that you can have your information in hand, within 3 minutes of your request. For instance, if you order a Social Locator Report, upto three minutes from when you entered the SS# into the computer you will have a list of current and previous addresses from around the country, including the holders name, that have been reported as belonging to that SS#. ------------------------------ From: dannyb@panix.com (danny burstein) Date: 06 Dec 1994 17:48:36 -0500 Subject: DMV Records (NYS) Organization: mostly unorganized since lots of people have trouble believing that DMV records really are (in almost all states) completely public, I've placed my own DMV file in my finger-plan. It shows you what a dial-up account to NYS's DMV service will get you if you look me up. This is a -public subscription- account, and anyone can purchase into it. (note: If you'd like me to check your NYS license - always a good idea every so oftne just like with any computer file, drop me a msg and I'll explain the procedure), drop me a note. to get the info: finger dannyb@panix.com -- Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key dannyb@panix.com (or dburstein@mcimail.com) ------------------------------ From: "Prof. L. P. Levine" Date: 07 Dec 1994 08:58:43 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: DMV Records (NYS) Organization: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee [I did the finger suggested in the previous posting, it is 600+ lines long. A part of it looks like this:] Login name: dannyb In real life: danny burstein Directory: /net/u/7/d/dannyb Shell: /usr/local/bin/psh Last login Wed Dec 7 04:21 on ttypa from ts2.nyc.access.n Plan: "given the current knowledge of physics and other sciences, we're pretty sure that the sun will rise tomorrow in the East. However, it's not so obvious that it will be shining...." "the moon looks pretty bright tonight, doesn't it?" dannyb@panix.com dburstein@mcimail.com ----------- Numerous folk asked me what sort of info is obtanable from the NYS-DMV computer search system. Accordingly, please find below the records you get in a typical example, namely my own. I've x'd out some of the material, although obviously anyone who wants to take the time can get it themselves... A reminder that this is a PUBLIC database. I could, for example, look up Al D'Amato or Al Sharpton... If you need something looked up, feel free to drop me email. sidenote: In almost all states (Calif. is the major exception) this info is public. About two dozen have public computer lookup ability. Last I checked NJ and Ct. were still in the paper and stone age. :part 1 - entering the name in the licensed driver field [ A ][ ] BALANCE: 25.43 - ENTER SEARCH ARGUMENTS BELOW - ** LICENSED DRIVER FILE SEARCH ** MOTORIST IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: **** OR **** NAME: burstein,daniel DATE OF BIRTH: SEX: ***************************************************************** ** VEHICLE REGISTRATION AND PLATE FILE SEARCH ** PLATE NUMBER: TYPE: **** OR **** NAME: DATE OF BIRTH: SEX: ****************************************************************** ** VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FILE SEARCH ** VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: YEAR: MAKE: ****************************************************************** TO SIGN OFF OF YOUR ACCOUNT, PLEASE ENTER AN 'X' HERE: _ FOR PASSWORD MODIFICATION TRANSACTION PLEASE ENTER AN 'X' HERE: _ :and this iw what you get back: [ A ][ ] BALANCE: 21.43 *** MULTIPLE RECORDS FIT YOUR SEARCH ARGUMENT(S). *** YOUR SEARCH ARGUMENT WAS BURSTEIN,DANIEL RECORD 1 BURSTEIN,DANIEL DATE OF BIRTH xx/yy/zz xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx D SEX MALE SCOTTSVILLE NY 14546 RECORD 2 BURSTEIN,DAN DATE OF BIRTH xx/yy/zz xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SEX MALE NEW YORK NY 10002 RECORD 3 BURSTEIN,DANIEL DATE OF BIRTH xx/yy/zz xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN SEX MALE JACKSON HGTS NY 11372 RECORD 4 BURSTYN,DANIEL DATE OF BIRTH xx/yy/zz xxxxxxxxxxxx SEX MALE LONG BEACH NY 99999 RECORD 5 BURSTEIN,DANIEL DATE OF BIRTH xx/yy/zz xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SEX MALE NEW YORK NY 10010 *** MULTIPLE RECORDS FIT YOUR SEARCH ARGUMENT(S). *** YOUR SEARCH ARGUMENT WAS BURSTEIN,DANIEL RECORD 1 BURSTYN,DANIEL,M DATE OF BIRTH xx/yy/zz xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SEX MALE E AURORA NY 14052 RECORD 2 BURSTEIN,DANIEL,M DATE OF BIRTH xx/yy/zz xxxxxxxxxxxx SEX MALE DOUGLASTON NY 11362 *RECORD 3 BURSTEIN,DANIEL,N DATE OF BIRTH xx/yy/zz * 5xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SEX MALE * NEW YORK NY 10027 RECORD 4 BURSTON,DANIEL,R DATE OF BIRTH xx/yy/zz xxxxxxxxxxx SEX MALE TORONTO ON 99999 RECORD 5 BURSTYN,DANIEL,S DATE OF BIRTH xx/yy/zz xxxxxxxxxxxxxx SEX MALE LONG BCH NY 11561 ( * this is my entry) TODAY'S DATE: 10/29/1994 TIME: 21:54:09 *RECORD EXPANSION FOR: BURSTEIN,DANIEL,N MI #: Bxxxxx yyyyy 531174-56 CLIENT ID#: xxxxxxxx BURSTEIN,DANIEL,N DOB: xx/yy/19zz SEX: M xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx HEIGHT: x-y EYE COLOR: BROWN NEW YORK NY 10027 COUNTY: NEWY LICENSE CLASS: *E* STATUS: VALID EXPIRATION:xx/yy/zz >> In the next series I entered the license plate number *** ENTER NEXT FUNCTION CODE MENU *** [ A ][ ] BALANCE: 17.43 - ENTER SEARCH ARGUMENTS BELOW - ** LICENSED DRIVER FILE SEARCH ** MOTORIST IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: **** OR **** NAME: DATE OF BIRTH: SEX: ********************************************************** ** VEHICLE REGISTRATION AND PLATE FILE SEARCH ** PLATE NUMBER: ecnalbma TYPE: **** OR **** NAME: DATE OF BIRTH: SEX: ************************************************************ ** VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FILE SEARCH ** VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: YEAR: MAKE: *********************************************************** TO SIGN OFF OF YOUR ACCOUNT, PLEASE ENTER AN 'X' HERE: _ FOR PASSWORD MODIFICATION TRANSACTION PLEASE ENTER AN 'X' HERE: _ [ A ][ ] BALANCE: 13.43 *** REGISTRATION RECORD EXPANSION *** TODAY'S DATE IS 10/29/94 PLATE: ECNALBMA TYPE: SPEC PASS REGISTRANT INFORMATION: VIN#: 1P4GH4038JX227854 BURSTEIN,DANIEL DOB: xx/yy/zz 88 PLYMO RED SUBN WEIGHT:003249 SEX: M FUEL: GAS CYL: 06 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNTY: NEWY EXPIRES: 12/04/95 VALID: 12/23/93 NEW YORK NY ZIP: 10027 INS: 328 - STATE FARM MUT AUTO CO MI#: Bxxxxx yyyyyy zzzzzz ----- PREVIOUS VEHICLES/PLATES/INSURANCE INFO ASSOCIATED WITH THIS RECORD ---- INSURANCE TERMINATED EFFECTIVE 09/12/93 FILED BY STATE FARM MUT AUTO CO ON 10/04/93 FILING RESCINDED INSURANCE TERMINATED EFFECTIVE 12/12/92 FILED BY U.S. FIDELITY & GUAR CO ON 12/23/92 INSURANCE TERMINATED EFFECTIVE 07/27/92 FILED BY U.S. FIDELITY & GUAR CO ON 08/06/92 FILING RESCINDED *** ENTER NEXT FUNCTION CODE NEXT *** ( RECORD CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE ) [ A ][ ] ----- PREVIOUS VEHICLES/PLATES/INSURANCE INFO ASSOCIATED WITH THIS RECORD ---- INSURANCE TERMINATED EFFECTIVE 12/17/90 FILED BY U.S. FIDELITY & GUAR CO ON 01/03/91 FILING RESCINDED 88 PLYMO RED SUBN WEIGHT:003249 FUEL: GAS CYL 06 VIN# 1P4GH4038JX227854 EXPIRES: 12/04/95 VALID: 12/23/93 INS: 328 - STATE FARM MUT AUTO CO INS: 328 - STATE FARM MUT AUTO CO ON FILE AS OF 07/06/92 PREVIOUS PLATE: 8KH933 TYPE: PASSENGER PLATES REPLACED ON: 07/06/92 INS: 357 - U.S. FIDELITY & GUAR CO ON FILE AS OF 05/07/92 INS: 357 - U.S. FIDELITY & GUAR CO ON FILE AS OF 05/07/92 INS: 357 - U.S. FIDELITY & GUAR CO ON FILE AS OF 11/20/91 INS: 357 - U.S. FIDELITY & GUAR CO ON FILE AS OF 04/30/91 *** ENTER NEXT FUNCTION CODE NEXT *** ( RECORD CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE ) [ A ][ ] ----- PREVIOUS VEHICLES/PLATES/INSURANCE INFO ASSOCIATED WITH THIS RECORD ---- INS: 357 - U.S. FIDELITY & GUAR CO ON FILE AS OF 12/05/89 --------------------------- REGISTRATION ACTIVITIES -------------------------- REG SUSPENDED ON: 12/13/93 FOR 000 DAYS - REASON: INS. NOT IN EFFECT COMPLIANCE DATE: 12/04/93 RESCINDED ON: 12/13/93 [the document continues with a pager FAQ. Privacy readers might find interesting information in the above.] -- Leonard P. Levine e-mail levine@cs.uwm.edu Professor, Computer Science Office 1-414-229-5170 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Fax 1-414-229-6958 Box 784, Milwaukee, WI 53201 ------------------------------ From: cburian@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Christopher J Burian) Date: 07 Dec 1994 04:10:25 GMT Subject: Re: DC Metro Smart Cards Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana mduman@astro.ocis.temple.edu (Michael Duman) writes: Yes, but, as somone else said before, how would this be of any benifit? You would still need a turnstyle, or some method of stopping those without/with a forged/disabled card... Maybe they should just use armed guards. Maybe they need smartcards that can signal their location when they're inside the car, and the computer could match warm bodies to valid cards. Then a kind, matronly voice announces, "The third gentleman on the left has not paid for his ride. We can not proceed until he exits the train." Other passengers would provide adequate motivation to pay your fair share. :-) -- Chris Burian ------------------------------ From: Jesse Mundis jesse@oes.amdahl.com Date: 07 Dec 1994 07:42:23 -0600 (CST) Subject: WWW Profile Registry The following came from the "net-happenings" mailing list. Gleason Sackman recently spake thusly: From owner-net-happenings@is.internic.net Tue Dec 6 01:43:13 1994 Date: 05 Dec 1994 08:08:25 -0600 (CST) From: Gleason Sackman Subject: WWW> Profile Registry (fwd) To: net-happenings Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-net-happenings@is.internic.net Precedence: bulk content-length: 1157 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- SENDER: "Geo. A. Jacobs" Subject: WWW> Profile Registry Date: 02 Dec 1994 15:46:00 -0800 New on the Internet. A place to post your personal profile. http://snark.wizard.com/wwpr.html The one feature that is available on the on-line services, and missing on the Internet. Register your personal profile with: World-Wide Profile Registry (WWPR) tell the world: Where to find you (email address) About your personal interests and hobbies Where you live (City, State, Country) A personal quote or favorite saying Alias that you use on irc And which channels you hang out in Your birthdate Occupation / Where you attend school Search the WWPR database: Keyword search to find any of the above that the registrant chooses to include in the profile. _____________________________________________________________________ There is NEVER a charge to search the WWPR database. Profile registration will be FREE to the first 2000 persons entering their profiles. Register today, let the world know who you are, what you are. http://snark.wizard.com/wwpr.html ------------------------------ From: Paul Robinson Date: 08 Dec 1994 10:13:42 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: 3 hits and you're out? (SSN use) Organization: Tansin A. Darcos & Company, Silver Spring, MD USA Geoffrey S Knauth, writes: friend was writing software to make credit checks... told his wife we'd been using my social security number... she told him he'd better not do three checks on me, or I wouldn't get any more credit. I was surprised to hear that a credit check carries with it this sort of penalty. It's a throttling mechanism. A person who might not pay bills might apply for lots of credit all at once, or is considered a bad risk because of the number of credit checks, which might indicate they are going to apply for more credit than they can service based on their income. Also, if such a thing happens, check why the refusal took place. 12 credit checks by prospective employers is a totally different form of investigation than 12 different Visa Card issuer credit checks. If such a thing happens, it's only short-term. Three to six months later, this won't be a problem. Further, if you are denied credit because of this, you could put a notice on your report - the credit reporting companies are required by law to accept such a statement - explaining the issue. Some will put the statement on your record automatically, and others will fight over having to include it, but I'm sure if you insist they will comply rather than risk being sued. -- Paul Robinson - Paul@TDR.COM Reports on Security Problems: To Subscribe write PROBLEMS-REQUEST@TDR.COM Voted "Largest Polluter of the (IETF) list" by Randy Bush ------------------------------ From: wbe@psr.com (Winston Edmond) Date: 07 Dec 1994 05:05:59 GMT Subject: Re: Dynamic Negotiation in the Privacy Wars Organization: Panther Software and Research rem@world.std.com (Ross E Mitchell) wrote: But a call that is rejected because of its anonymity should entail no charge. This requires that the call be intercepted by the phone company's central office switchboard before it reaches the recipient's line. Doesn't one of the Baby Bells already offer an extra-cost service that allows one to automatically reject calls where the ID is blocked (i.e., "out of area" isn't blocked, but *67 calls would be rejected)? Here's how such a system would work with caller ID. ... The thwarted caller hears a short recorded message that to complete the call, the originating phone number must be furnished. This message then instructs the caller what code to dial to give out the number. Otherwise, the call is incomplete and the caller is not charged. For this to be practical, it must be possible for the caller to issue the command to permit ID delivery without having to hang up or redial the number. -- WBE ------------------------------ From: berczuk@glendower.mit.edu (Steve Berczuk) Date: 07 Dec 1994 15:31:30 GMT Subject: Caller ID and Blocking Organization: MIT Center for Space Research You are correct that your phone number is passed throughout the network, regardless of the privacy setting of your line. However, a "privacy bit" is also set which informs the carriers that you do not want the number displayed on the receiving end to subscribers who have purchased Caller ID service. The FCC requires that phone companies honor the setting of this bit. Unfortunately, the FCC has also ruled that, beginning in April '95, per line blocking may NOT be used to block display of the caller's number interstate calls; only *67 (1167 for rotary phones) is to be used! This explains why, a couple of years ago when the MASS PUC was debating caller id services (and either the service did not yet exist, or I had my line blocked, I don't recall..) I called Mac Warehouse and they greeted me with "hello mr..." which the deduced from the number I was calling from... (I am not at all sure what the state of federal regulation was at that time..) This is an example of the problems that arise when rules about caller id and related issues are regulated on a statewide basis. Mass rules did not apply to out of state calls. (I guess mail order houses stopped discovered that guessing who was calling freaked people out too much; the next time I called, they asked me for a customer Id before using my name !) -- Steve Berczuk -berczuk@mit.edu | MIT Center for Space Research NE80-6015 Phone: (617) 253-3840 | Fax: (617) 253-8084 ------------------------------ From: Bob Denning Date: 06 Dec 1994 23:18:48 -0800 Subject: Caller ID and Blocking Leonard P Levine requested information on the value of per call blocking of caller identification. I am not a telephone engineer so the following comments may not be exacting in terminology but I believe they are functionally correct. Caller ID (CID) is one of a number of features being offered under the banner of Customer Line Advanced Subscriber Services (CLASS) which are packaged with central office software. The key element to them is the delivery of a data stream on an out-of-voice-band signaling protocol that is sent through the network as part of the SS7 type call setup signaling. The data includes the phone number, (ten-digit) and subscriber name information, and it is delivered to the called line right after the first ring. The data stream also includes a blocking digit that when turned on tells the end office serving the phone number dialed to not send the CID onward to the person being called. The digit can be turned on either by permanent CID blocking, which turns it on for all calls placed from a subscriber line, or by dialing "*67". The result is the same. The value is best judged by the other phone number signal found in the network: Automatic Number Identification (ANI). ANI is sent when long distance or 911 services are accessed. It is sent in-band and cannot be blocked. It is the key to the billing system and as such has been built to be very secure both from tampering and from inadvertent disclosure. The problem currently being addressed is that long- distance carriers made a decision to send the ANI to their 800 and 900 customers either by passing it directly through their equipment, for those big customers who could receive it that way, or by generating a CID signal from the ANI they received from the network for the little guy. This meant that the security and privacy associated with ANI was being violated. The FCC's decision has been to require the sending of CID so that ANI will not be delivered to customers. In theory call blocking becomes valuable because it will keep your phone number from being delivered to phone company customers. Dialing "*67" should be very valuable if you like your privacy, however: with some central office manufacturer's software it appears that dialing "*67" only turns the switch to the opposite of what it is normally. So, if permanent caller ID blocking has been installed on a line, dialing "*67" will allow the caller ID to be displayed, sometimes. Having Caller ID blocked is better than having ANI delivered. But, since up to this point the decision on whether to allow blocking has been made at the state regulatory level, what is allowed in the form of blocking locally is what those customers get nationally. The phone companies would generally like no blocking because it opens the door to a bunch of slick CLASS services. ------------------------------ From: Lynne Gregg Date: 07 Dec 94 17:24:00 PST Subject: Caller ID and Blocking I clipped your recent query about how privacy indication is treated with Caller ID services. Your original assumption is correct. That is: Calling Party Number is *always* transmitted in the Initial Address Message of the SS7 data stream. The only exception is that if an interconnecting carrier is non-SS7, they obviously cannot pass anything (this accounts for OUT OF AREA conditions). When there's SS7 end-to-end, your telephone number WILL BE PASSED ALONG WITH "PI bits" (also referred to as CNIR or CNI Restrict) indicating whether the number should be blocked (displaying PRIVATE or ANONYMOUS) or displayed on the Caller ID box. State and Federal regulation requires carriers to observe and correctly process the PI bits - IN ALL CASES. 911 services rely on ANI which cannot be blocked. As it stands today, the FCC Ruling on Calling Number Services is likely to go into effect 4/95 as originally ordered in 3/94. Although the FCC Ruling does away with per line blocking (on interstate calls) it does require carriers to support the feature code *67 for per call blocking. Therefore, if your concern is that the FCC is removing your right to block on interstate calls, just use *67 as a prefix to those calls. My suspicion is that LEC's and RBOC's offering Caller ID services today will stop offering per line blocks to customers after April because they will need to observe the FCC Rule. Most local carriers aren't equipped to separately treat inter and intrastate calls. That's why I believe per line blocking will go away. In my personal view, *67 is a hassle to have to deal with if your desire is to block all calls. But I believe the FCC's Rule does a good job of trying to please everyone - including the consumer who buys Caller ID. There's understandably significant dissatisfaction with a service that works only half the time. The FCC is trying to discourage those PRIVATE and OUT OF AREA messages from appearing on consumer Caller ID boxes. -- Lynne Gregg ------------------------------ From: "Prof. L. P. Levine" Date: 28 Nov 1994 08:46:14 -0600 (CST) Subject: Info on CPD, (unchanged since 11/28/94) Organization: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee The Computer Privacy Digest is a forum for discussion on the effect of technology on privacy or vice versa. The digest is moderated and gatewayed into the USENET newsgroup comp.society.privacy (Moderated). Submissions should be sent to comp-privacy@uwm.edu and administrative requests to comp-privacy-request@uwm.edu. This digest is a forum with information contributed via Internet eMail. Those who understand the technology also understand the ease of forgery in this very free medium. Statements, therefore, should be taken with a grain of salt and it should be clear that the actual contributor might not be the person whose email address is posted at the top. Any user who openly wishes to post anonymously should inform the moderator at the beginning of the posting. He will comply. If you read this from the comp.society.privacy newsgroup and wish to contribute a message, you should simply post your contribution. As a moderated newsgroup, attempts to post to the group are normally turned into eMail to the submission address below. On the other hand, if you read the digest eMailed to you, you generally need only use the Reply feature of your mailer to contribute. If you do so, it is best to modify the "Subject:" line of your mailing. Contributions generally are acknowledged within 24 hours of submission. An article is printed if it is relevant to the charter of the digest and is not redundant or insulting. If selected, it is printed within two or three days. The moderator reserves the right to delete extraneous quoted material. He may change the subject line of an article in order to make it easier for the reader to follow a discussion. He will not, however, alter or edit or append to the text except for purely technical reasons. A library of back issues is available on ftp.cs.uwm.edu [129.89.9.18]. Login as "ftp" with password identifying yourid@yoursite. The archives are in the directory "pub/comp-privacy". People with gopher capability can most easily access the library at gopher.cs.uwm.edu. Mosaic users will find it at gopher://gopher.cs.uwm.edu. Older archives are also held at ftp.pica.army.mil [129.139.160.133]. ---------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Leonard P. Levine | Moderator of: Computer Privacy Digest Professor of Computer Science | and comp.society.privacy University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee | Post: comp-privacy@uwm.edu Box 784, Milwaukee WI 53201 | Information: comp-privacy-request@uwm.edu | Gopher: gopher.cs.uwm.edu levine@cs.uwm.edu | Mosaic: gopher://gopher.cs.uwm.edu ---------------------------------+----------------------------------------- ------------------------------ End of Computer Privacy Digest V5 #071 ****************************** .